Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 4

UPSC / IAS PREP: PHILOSOPHY OPTIONAL DINESH

BISHNOI (212 MARKS OPTIONAL)


xaam.in /2016/08/upsc-ias-prep-philosophy-optional.html

This post on Philosophy optional preparation has been written by Dinesh Bishnoi (212 marks in Philosophy in
cse 2013). I am merely hosting this post. He may be reached
onhttps://www.facebook.com/dinesh.bishnoi.1420354

In this post, not only does he tell us about the subject and topicwise books and strategy, but also dwells a great
length on answer writing and even writes few sample answers. Many thanks to him!

************************************************************************************
Words of Dinesh Bishnoi

NOTE- My marks 212 ,first attempt did coaching from Patanjali. The below written article is based on my
experience and the aim is to provide guidance to new students so that they can get accurate study material.

INTRODUCTION

Philosophy as a optional is one of the most popular optional. One can take philosophy if he has logical aptitude.
The benefit of philosophy is concise syllabus and logical nature and it can be done in 4 months and very helpful
in essay and ethics. But cons is that paper 2 of philosophy has been awarded poorly by UPSC since last 2
years. Anyway this does not matter and I can say it is one of safe bet because it provides enough time to prepare
GS Papers simultaneously.

The syllabus of philosophy is divided into 4 sections-


1. Western philosophy
2. Indian philosophy
3. Social-political philosophy
4. Religious philosophy

Books Needed

1.Patanjali class notes(gives you good basic understanding)


2.Dutta and Chatterjee (INDIAN PHILOSOPHY)
3. C.D Sharma (INDIAN PHILOSOPHY)

1/4
4.Y.Masih (WESTERN PHILOSOPHY)
5.D.Palmer(WESTERN PHILOSOPHY)
6.Hick ( RELIGIOUS PHILOSOPHY)
7. O.P GAUBA ( selectively)
8.STANFORD WEBSITE

PAPER 1

It is purely conceptual and logical. If you have firm grip on concepts you could score good marks in paper 1 itself.
But it requires good understanding and writing practise.

First of all try to study basic points before starting the syllabus. These are
1. What is Substance
2. Epistemeology
3. Meaning of metaphysics
4. Induction and Deduction methods
5. Sources of knowledge
6.Deism,theism,pantheism

Indian Philosophy

If you are self study student start with Indian Philosophy(because its syllabus can be easily covered within 20
days and it is very easy also).Best way is to get Patanjali class notes and understand basic points from the
notes. Once you are thorough with all chapters of Indian philosophy from Patanjali class notes you should buy 2
books:
1. Dutta and Chatterjee
2. CD Sharma.

One must study Dutta and Chatterjee very well and should add additional points to the classs notes of
Patanjali.C.D Sharma is best for Nyaya Vaishesika and one must read this chapter well from C.D Sharma.

This is sufficient for Indian Philosophy .

Western Philosophy

Here also Patanjali class notes are the best. Study from Patanjali class notes very well chapter to chapter. After
studying all chapters well from Patanjali class notes go to Y.Masih.For good and indepth understanding study
Donald palmer selectively.

For contemporary western philosophy go to Patanjali printed notes along with class notes.For value addition use
Stanford philosophy Website which is best and provide you very basic concepts and in depth material.

This will suffice for western philosophy.

Further compulsory solve last 20 years paper +give tests at home by solving last 2 years paper.This will help in
time management ,practise needed to handle exam situation.

PAPER 2

Social Political Philosophy

Here INTERNET ,HINDU AND TIMES OF INDIA are the most important sources. For basic reference do
PATANJALI class notes then internet is needed for various topics,example for women Empowerment go to
United Nations Website.For land and property rights various articles from United Nations are important.
Hindu basically covers current affairs portion.ex- capital punishment like topics are covered through newspapers.
The one question on Minority Rights under democracy are safe or not was taken from Uttar Pradesh incident. So
do current affairs very well.

2/4
Solve problems from philosophical view point. Ex- if asked democracy vs monarchy write from philosophical
point of view that democracy is better, here you can quote Leibnitz Monadolgy.

Religious philosophy

Basically it requires deep knowledge of paper1. If you have done paper -1 wellthen religious philosophy is all
about practice. Here also class notes of Patanjali is sufficient +do hick selectively.

Paper-2 is all about answer writing. How could easily you can make your answer objective ,marks depend on it.

Answer Writing
In last two years marks in Paper 2 have been difficult to score. There are many reasons for this-

Unexpectedly long papers

Tough evaluation in paper 2

Students not able to write what is expected by UPSC

Solution

First philosophy as a subject in answer writing requires good introduction and conclusion. Another aspect is
comparative analysis of one thinker with another.

Sample Answers

1. Discuss how by refuting different concepts of substance Aristotle establishes his own theory of substance?

Substance is one of imp matter of discussion in philosophy.Through this concept various Philosopherstried to
explain the diversity and unity of this universe.Now you should write Platos theory n then refutation of it by
Aristotle.
After it one should tell Aristotles concept of Substance,but problem lies here most of people end it here only,
here in 20 words we must write 2 criticism of Aristotle theory of substance that will make your answer complete,
just after criticism write one importance of Aristotles theory.

2. Explain Locke theory of substance.

Here introduction is same but here they had asked Locke theory only but here one must do comparative analysis
with other two empiricist philosophers. This analysis is called as comparative analysis. Always in critical
examination show both merits and demerits and write a balanced conclusion.

3. Can mystical experiences be regarded as valid source of knowledge?

Mystical experience is related to religious person. Mystical Experience is trans-empirical phenomena where unity
is established between worshipper n worshipped. Spinoza, Bradley, Tagore has supported mystical experience.
But for being a valid source of knowledge from logical point of view it requires objective verification. But mystical
experience cannot be objectively verified.
Mimansikaschool of philosophy has given various criteria for valid source of knowledge-
1. It must not arise from defective causes
2. It must be free from contradiction
3. It must be self- consistent
4. It must truly represent the object
On the above criterias mystical experience cannot be accepted as valid source of knowledge.
Again in western philosophy Logical Positivism does not accept it as a valid source of knowledge. They says
only that thing can be accepted as valid source of knowledge which is analytically or empiricially verified.
But if we look from kierkegaard view he clearly says believe in order to understand.so here we may say for
religious person mystical experience can be accepted as valid source of knowledge because for a religious truth
objective proofs doesnt matter.
3/4
Basically various philosophers has accepted experience, reason and verbal testimony as valid sources of
knowledge .on the basis of experience it is difficult to explain mystical experience as valid source of knowledge
because subject matter of mystical experience is transcendental. On the basis of reason and logical arguments
we cannot accept it as a valid source of knowledgebecause logical arguments demands proof and it is very
difficult to prove mystical experience.
But on the other hand Rudolf Otto has accepted it as a valid source of knowledge.This view has been supported
by Wittgenstein who says skeptismabout religious matter is senseless.Here various philosophers has accepted
mystic experience as a direct knowledge which one gets through intuition.Meditation,Prayer,Samadhi are also
means of mystic experience.

4. Discuss Nozick theory of justice and its relevance?

Nozick defines justice as entitlement.as a individual we may claim over three things-
1.Our own body,soul,mind
2.Nature
3.Those natural things which have been modified by an individual using his talent.
Further Nozicks says that entitlement is just or valid if these three conditions are met-
1. Initial acquisition
2. Voluntary acquisition
3. Rectification
Current relevance-
Nozick defined justice in the terms of entitlement and its practical significance is relevant in todays society also
because it provides entitlement to traditional owners of land and his theory can be used to provide security to
traditional forest dwellers whose rights are continuously snatched by govt and multinational companies for their
own pecuniary gains.

Coachings

There are 2 famous Coachings: Mitra and Patanjali. Though I do not know much about Mitra but since I had
done coaching from Patanjali I can give its pros and cons

PROs-
1. DHARMENDRA sir is very cooperative and ready to help you.
2. Teaches Indian philosophy and western philosophy very well

CONS-
1. But problem in religious philosophy sir teaches very less and finishes it within a week.
2. Poor test series and evaluation of copies is very poor.
Source : Gaurav Aggrawals Blog

4/4