Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
[Experiment 4]
Group No: 4
Name: 1. ELFERRA FARREL TIMPAS 22028
2. AIMAN BIN NOORUDIN 22221
3. AMIRUL ASHRAF BIN ABDUL RAZAK 23157
4. NESHA PRIYA A/P ARASU 22106
5. NURULSYAZANA BINTI ONN 21293
GA Name: HARIZ BIN ROSLAN 16000703
Examiner Mark
1
CDB 3082 Chemical Engineering Lab 4 September 2017
Table of Content
1.0 Introduction ...............................................................................................................3
2.0 Methodology. ..............................................................................................................4
3.0 Results and Discussion ..............................................................................................5
4.0 Conclusion ................................................................................................................13
5.0 Reference ..........................................................................................................................13
6.0 Appendix ...........................................................................................................................14
2
CDB 3082 Chemical Engineering Lab 4 September 2017
1.0 Introduction
In this experiment, the flash is experimented in the close system called close-up,
even though the flash point can determine by two ways which are in open-cup and close-
up.
3
CDB 3082 Chemical Engineering Lab 4 September 2017
2.0 Methodology.
2.1 Experiment 1: To determine the flash point of pure liquid components
(CRM, Diesel and Kerosene).
i) Procedure load sample
1. The eraflash flash point tester and chiller is switched on.
2. The cup with the stirrer bar is cleaned up before the sample is filled in.
3. The chamber door is opened and placed with the cup.
4. The chamber door is closed for the process is started.
4
CDB 3082 Chemical Engineering Lab 4 September 2017
Margin
Sample Flash point measured (c) Flash point expected (c)
Error (%)
Table 3.1: Flash points measured for CRM, kerosene and diesel.
Sample
Kerosene Diesel Flash point Flash point Margin
(%) (%) measured (c) expected (c) Error (%)
Table 3.2: Flash points measured for different composition mixture of kerosene and diesel.
5
CDB 3082 Chemical Engineering Lab 4 September 2017
80
70
Flashpoint (c)
60 53.3
50
40
30
20
10
0
Sample
Kerosene Diesel
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0 20 40 60 80 100
Kerosene composition (%)
6
CDB 3082 Chemical Engineering Lab 4 September 2017
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Diesel Composition (%)
DISCUSSIONS
The flash point tester instrument was calibrated by using the CRM sample. According
to our result, the margin error of the flash point measured and expected for CRM is low
which is only 2.9%, hence, it can be said that the instrument is working properly and its
measurement system performance is validated to give us accurate result.
7
CDB 3082 Chemical Engineering Lab 4 September 2017
Before we measure the flash point of our sample using the flash point tester
instrument, we set the expected flash point by referring to its theoretical flash point. For fuel
oil sample, its theoretical flash point varies between 60 to 174 (U.S. Oil & Refining Co.,
2008). Kerosene has flash point with range of 38 to 54 while diesel has range of 82 to
93 (NIIR Board of Consultants & Engineers, 2015). We picked any value that is within
each of the fuels flash point range. Based on our findings as shown in Table 3.1, the flash
points measured for all the samples are within the range. It can be said our experiment results
are accurate. The margin errors for our results are lower than 5% which are very small.
80
70
Flashpoint (c)
60 53.3
50
40
30
20
10
0
Sample
Kerosene Diesel
Figure 4.1: Petroleum distillation tower and petroleum fractions (Kennepohl, 2015).
8
CDB 3082 Chemical Engineering Lab 4 September 2017
According to Graph 3.1, the flash point of diesel is higher than kerosene. This can be
explained from the production of these oils during petroleum refining as illustrated in Figure
4.1, diesel has higher number of carbons and boiling point compared to kerosene. Diesel has
16-60 number of carbons with boiling point of 260-350 whereas kerosene has 10-16
number of carbons with boiling point of 180-260. The most volatile and lowest boiling
point components condensate at the top of the column whereas the least volatile and highest
boiling points condensate at the bottom of the column. Therefore, the higher the boiling
point, the higher the flash point will be.
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0 20 40 60 80 100
Kerosene composition (%)
9
CDB 3082 Chemical Engineering Lab 4 September 2017
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Diesel Composition (%)
Based on Graph 3.2, as the composition of kerosene in the mixture increases, the flash point
of the mixture decreases whereas in Graph 3.3, when the composition of diesel in the mixture
increase, the flash point of the mixture increases. This is due to the fact that, as shown in
Table 3.1, pure kerosene has lower flash point than diesel which is 53.3 while pure diesel
has flash point of 86.3. Hence, when the composition of kerosene is higher than diesel in
the mixture, the mixture is dominant of kerosene therefore reducing the flash point of the
mixture and vice versa for increasing composition of diesel in the mixture.
The importance of flash point and fire point in the transportation and storage of
dangerous materials.
Flash point and fire point are very important in the handling, transportation and
storage of dangerous materials. Initial boiling point and flash point are the basis for
classification of flammable liquids as it is related with the liquids volatility (Geyer & Wisuri,
2017). However, in this experiment we focus more on flash point. The vapor formation of the
liquid is the main factor in determining fire and explosion hazard as the vapor of the liquid
over the liquid (when it is at its flash point) that can form a flammable mixture when exposed
to air not the liquid itself that burns.
The lower the flash point of a substance, the more flammable the substance is. It can
be a fire hazard, prone to flashing and possible continuous ignition as well as explosion
(ASTM International, 2010). Generally, liquids with flash point below ambient storage
10
CDB 3082 Chemical Engineering Lab 4 September 2017
temperature show a rapid rate of spreading of flame over the surface of the liquid. Hence,
more vapor will be generated causing the substance more vulnerable to fire if not stored
properly.
According to Rekus (1994), fire point is defined as the temperature where liquid
produces vapors at a rate enough to sustain steady combustion. Fire point is slightly higher
than flash point. Fire point is different than flash point because at flash point, when the vapor
is ignited, it will produce momentarily flame and will cease away once the source of the
ignition is off. However, at fire point, the vapor will continue to burn even after the source of
ignition is off.
So, by knowing the flash point and fire point, we can store and transport any
flammable and combustible materials accordingly to prevent fire and explosion accident from
happening. For example, flammable liquids should be stored separately from other substances
and located in a contained area where when there is a fire happen, it will not likely rapidly
involved in the accident. Apart from that, flammable liquids should be stored in its specific
containers and any vehicles transporting the flammable liquid should be engineered to
prevent the surrounding temperature affecting the temperature of the liquid.
The importance of flash point experiment when there is no data available in the
literature for mixture having different compositions.
The fundamental reason for flash point measurement is to assess the safety hazard of a
liquid mixture or semi-solid regarding to their flammability. Although this is an empirical
measurement that will vary with method and its parameters (Liaw & Chiu, 2006), it is an
important property which is a critical factor for determining agent stability during
dissemination, safe storage and handling. Since most substances are produced, packaged and
delivered in their pure form, flashpoint measurement is necessary with the aim of classifying
the liquid mixtures into their respective groups. The adulteration of a pure substance can
increase the risk of danger. For example, the mixing of kerosene with highly volatile gasoline
can cause numerous fires and explosions.
The flash point of mixture obviously differs from the flash points of their individual
components. Estimating or computing the flash points of mixtures alone are not enough
because chemical compounds are very likely to exhibit different characteristics once they are
mixed with other compounds. Viscous liquids can only be heated slowly and liquid mixtures
11
CDB 3082 Chemical Engineering Lab 4 September 2017
always change their compositions are they evaporate. Hence, experiments must be conducted
under various conditions to deduce the flash point of flammable chemical compounds. This is
very crucial as flammable liquids (usually mixtures) have different safety precautions
according to their hazard levels. It can be concluded that this experiment is vital for oil and
gas industries as there are many hazards that have be looked into. Precautions can be taken to
prevent fire hazards as well as to sustain the quality and grade of the goods. Chemical
compounds and mixtures that have flash point of 37.78oC (100F) and below, special
precautions are necessary for safe handling while for compounds with flash points that
exceed 65.56oC (150F), they may pose safety hazards under non-standard conditions. It is
important to take note that mixtures containing an inert inhibitor can exhibit no flash point
when a standard test are carried out, but they are still potentially flammable. Hence it is
crucial to carry out more stringent tests when testing hydrocarbon-air mixture with inhibitors.
(Raju, 2014)
There are few factors that affects the difference in measured and expected flash point
of a flammable liquid which are oxidation, impurities, and composition. When oxidation
happens, insufficiency of oxygen is bound to happen, when oxygen is lacking, as stated by
Rajput (n.d.), the air is insufficient for complete combustion causing the fuel to burn partially
hence, flash point temperature will have an increase in value.
Impurities can also increase the flash point of a flammable liquid. When an impurity
exist, such as water vapour which is when water is present in the sample, the flammable
material dominates and the lower limit concentration will be reached at just a little over the
temperature of the flash point of the pure flammable liquid (Astbury, 2004).
As for composition, when two or more component liquids are being tested, the more
volatile component will be richer in the vapour. Based on Astbury (2004), the loss of more
volatile component due to the mixture with lesser volatile components will result in the flash
point being far higher than the true flash point.
12
CDB 3082 Chemical Engineering Lab 4 September 2017
4.0 Conclusion
Based on the results that we get, it was understood that kerosene has the lowest flash
point and diesel has the highest. When mixing these two fuels, it was shown that as the
percentage of the kerosene decreases, the flash point temperature of the sample had an
increase in value. This proves the fact that diesel has a higher flash point temperature than
that of kerosene. Fire point and flash point are important in classification of flammable
liquids to prevent fire or explosion accident. Thus, testing of flash point experiment is
important when there is no data available in the literature for mixture having different
compositions.
5.0 Reference
ASTM International (2010). Significance of Tests for Petroleum Products (ASTM Manuals &
Monograms - Manual 1) (8th ed.). Rand., S. J., (Ed.). Bridgeport, NJ: ASTM
International.
Geyer, W. & Wisuri, J. (2017). Handbook of Storage Tank Systems: Codes: Regulations, and
Designs. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc, pp.275-276.
13
CDB 3082 Chemical Engineering Lab 4 September 2017
Liaw, H. J., & Chiu, Y. Y. (2006). A general model for predicting the flash point of
miscible mixtures. Journal of hazardous materials, 137(1), 38-46.
NIIR Board of Consultants & Engineers (2015). Modern Technology Of Petroleum, Greases,
Lubricants & Petro Chemicals. 2nd ed. Delhi, India: Publication Division, National
Institute of Industrial Research, p.470.
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) (n.d.). Occupational Safety and
Health Standards - Hazardous Materials - Flammable Liquids. USA: OSHA.
Rajput, R. (2010). Thermal Engineering. 8th ed. Boston, USA: Laxmi Publications (P) Ltd,
pp.495-496.
Raju, K. (2014). Chemical Process Industry Safety. New Delhi: McGraw Hill.
Rekus, J. (1994). Complete confined spaces handbook. Boca Raton: Lewis Publishers, p.37.
6.0 Appendix
Sample calculations:
1
+
100% 100%
14