Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
1271
1
SYNOPSIS.
In this pnper the following subjeots ~re 8tpt~ .: - the solution of Coulomb's tbeory for
earth press1.U'1), where the oohesion of oorth being oonsidered : genom! thoory on t he se1smJo
en.rlh pressure j nnd the seismio stnbil:it.y of ~ :retAining wall nnd,. dron. rloUd nlso-whnt kind of
nttention should be pnid for the d9l<ign of a retnming WI'U in fnture ? _wlmt was the fllRl
enuse of t he dRtnnge to the quny wnll of YOkObnlD11o on September Ist. 1m?
Prefac e.
Remarkable progress on the theory of earth pressure and on the stability
of a. retaining wall and a dam, h A.YC been made t:uder the statical condition up
to date. In the country. where the destructive earthquake may occur, the
stability of a retaining wall and a. dam is required to be studied Dot only on
statics but on dynamics. The writer, in this paper, will touch to this problem,.
There a.re two tbea:ries for eartl} pressure, known. as Coulomb's theory and
Rankin's theory, J.n the former, the direction of earth pressure is assumed to
make a certain angle , (equivaJent to the angle of repose between the wall and
en,rth) to the wall; wl~e in the latter, the d.i rection of earth pressure is always
parallel to its surf8.C(>. If a wall tends to begin relative movement against
cartll, the l ine of pressure should be affected by the friction between them.
Hence tho Coulomb's theory is preferred to study the ultimate stability of a
wa.ll.
For the design of a. sma.ller wall, the cohesion of earth must not be ignored,
for which the writer has given th~ theoretical solutiot'o In the seismic field,
where the direction of the gravity being inclined due to the seismic force, the
genera.l F.Olutiou for earth pressure llas beeu deduced also by the writel',
h
,
~278 Grulsrnl Theory 011 EArth Pressure A!ld Sesimio Stability o~ RetAinjug Wflll "nd DAm 2
CONTENTS.
section I .
Section TI.
Sectiou III. ,
Stability of reta.ining wall and gravity dam, where seismio force being
considered.
Arh. I. The direction a.nd the :ma.gnitude of the resultant force of gl'avity
and ea.rthquake.
Art. 2. Applica.tion of general s<?lution of earth pressure to a retaining
wall, where seismic force being considered.
Art. 3. Water pressure ou a. qua.y 'wall or on a dam, when seismic action
is considered.
Art. 4. Resultant force acting on a retaining wall.
Ad. G. Resultant force acting on a. Mm.
Arh. 6. Stability of a retaining waH and a dam.
Section IV.
,
Sugg ~sti on for the iaeal design of the retaining wall, and the e:crunples ou
the design of the quay wall.
Art. 1. Suggestion for ~e id~a1 design of the retaining 'Wall.
Art. 2. Examples on the new design of the quay wall.
Appendix.
Study on the cause of the damage to the quay wall of Yokohama Harbour
due to the earthquake on ~ptember 1st, 1923.
Section I.
Solution of Coulomb'. theory on earth pressurs, when
the cohesion of earth being taken into account.
Notations used;
Q P=reSll.ltant earth pressure on the wall.
E=resultallt 6&11h pJ;eesure On the plane-
of rupture.
13
W =weight .of earth . in wedged section a.
ABC.
Q= resultant of uniform surcharge on BO.
w=weight of earth per unit yolume ..
q =S1lrCbatge per unit area.
h=height of the wall.
A.
Fig. 1. a = a.ngle betwfoen the backwa.rd pll,lne of
the waH and the horizon.
'P=8.ngle of repose of earth.
.tpo = angle of repose between the waU a.nd
earth.
K = resultallt force of cohesion along the
plane of rupture.
k=intensity of cohesion per., unit area.
B=angle of inclination of the surface of
earth to the horizon.
8 =augle of inclination of the plane of
rupture to the horizon.
p=intensity of earth pressure at a.ny
Fig. 2. depth n.
1~80 081181'111 Thoory on Earth Pres~ur8 Rnd Se:smio Stability of Retniuing W"ll nnd Drun j
W= wli'sin(a-O)sin(a-B)
2 sin2o: sin (o -e)
i. e.
"I ..
iI . sin ~~-O) +q lsin (8 - '1') sin (~-8) - kI. sin (0<-0) cos 'I'
P = _,-,2=-_.--= sm=~';:--:-':;::':C::-"7-:-:::-:-=--=:-;;--;;;-_ _ _ _ __
sin '" sin (~ B+ 'I' + '1',) sin (8 0) .
. . . . . . . .. . . ... . . .. . . . . . . . . . .~
By Coulomb's theorem, the ea.rth pressure must be equal to the m.a..nmnID
'Value of P concerning to~. 'llherefore ~ will bs detennined by the following
eqna.tion.
dP .
--=0
d8
while
dP
do
=..../!.-[J
8m ,,1 2
.."sin(<<-O)8W C(;
+qlJoos(8 - 'I')Sin(~ - 8)
l
- sin (8-'1') cos (<< -8)1 sin (,, -8+'1'+'1',) sin (8 -0)
_[11 wliSin(<<-O)
28lUQ:
+q)sin(8-'I') sin (a-8)
- - -_ __ .. .. - ......
6 Gelle~l Theory on FAuth Preasute Aond: ~ismio Stftbility of Beta.inlDg Wall .~d .D~ 128"
- sin (8 - '7') oos (.. - 8)} sin (.. - 8+'7'+<}'.) ain (8-8)
_[I1. wlis~
2
(",-8) +q} sin (8-
SlD IX
'7') sin (,,":'8)
-[I whsin.(
2;
.. -8)
SJ.n ct
+q)Sin(8 - '7')sin(OI - 8)
sin ('P. +8) =008 I'[ COS ("-'7') sin ('7'.+8)- 2k sin. ("-8) cos '7'
wh 8m (,,-8) + }
. q
\ 2 sma:
I + 2ksin(,,-8)cos'P
J wit Sin, (a-8)
1. 2 sma
+ql C08('P.+ 8)] . . . . . . . . . . . (3)
l
1282 .GenorN ,Theory on FArth Pressure Ilond Seismic Stability . of BoWning Wfloll fUld Dam "
...,:2:::k:;s",in~
(<I.:,;:,,,,0)",0,,0:::S.z"'7 sin (op, + 0)
12 wll. s~ .(<I. -O) .
sm~
+ql
Substituting these values in eq. (3). we hs.,o
2bc <J! _at
tant,.t_ u tanp- + , , -:;-= 0
u a" lJ-a'
Then substituting the known yalue of B in eq. (2). we have the maximum
'value of P, which indicates the theoretica.l earth pressure.
wh' . sin (",-0) + gil) sin (o-op) sin (,,- o)-k II sin (<1. -0) c~s op
p= 1 2 Sill " . (6)
sin '" sin (" 0 +g>+op,) sin (0 0)
Let P be the intensity of eart4 pressure at any depth '7. t.he following relation
will be held.
dP .
.. p= dTf 8m .
Therefore. we ba,ye
(':teuer"l Theory on EEuth Pres~ure nnd Seismio Stability of Retn.iCl ~ W!lll nnd Dnm 1283
The point of a pplication of the resultant ea.rth pressure will be easily found
from the ceater of figure of tlie pressure iuten.:;ity trapezoid, because tl1e pres-
sure is ap. .uuifonnly varying traction.
f sin rx
\ -3 k sin(a-e)cosg,
..
sin (o< -B +'1' +'1',) sin (B-e)
-2 k sin (rx- e) COSqJ ]
. sin (,,-B+'P+<p,) sin (B - e)
J
+L. S ill (ct-o) L
S~. wh sin (ct -8) s iu (0: -0)
2
=h_l__o~~__~~2~Sin
~'o<~____~__~2~~Si~D~"~s~in~(~8_-~OL)_r_
j wh~.
2
sin(o: -O)Sill (et -O) + . sin (a-b)
si1l2a;
I
q sin ct sin (0 _ 6) f
I sin \O -fp)
sin (O:-6 +<P+({Jo) -2
. I k sin (a-B) cos <p
sin (a-o+IP+qJo) Sill (8-6)
sin (8-'1') l..~ sin (a -8) C03 <p
l
1284 Gene.:rIIo1 Theory on E 'Irtb Pressuro ~nd Seismio Stabilit.y of Retnining WAll nud Dnm 8
( ~w+ ~ ):Sin(O-<p)-2..Kcos<p
l _
l~= I ~;l~U772~~.-~-,~2~____ . . . . . (8)
( W+Q ) sin(o '1') Kcos<p
a=sio (<p.+0)
b=cos ("'+<p+<p.-O) - C03 ("'- <p) cos (<p. +0)
. . (9)
c=coS ("'-'1' ) sin (<p.+ 0)
. (ct- 0) +qslD<X
p = I 'W7]Slll . I....c"sm"'
-_ , ,,(0:', --...,<P"F1:..:=",,.,(",,,,--,,O:L
'. ) .,. : ' . (11)
Slll <X S10 (<X- 0+'1' +<p,,)
w +..5L
3 2
. . . . . . . . . . (12)
W+Q
In the case when k = O, eq. 264) in Prof. Shibata's Applied Mechanics AIt.
157 is identical to eq. (3) in tIlls section, hence by giying some redactions, eq.
(9) and (10) are proved to be identical to the following formulae, which are
written in Art. 157 itS eq. 265) and 266).
tan 0= sin q>vs~ (~-8) sin (91+9',,) + sin ext/sin (<p-O )sin (0'; +q>,,)
cos <pI vsin (0< 0) sin (<p + <P.)+= "vsin (<p 0) sin ("'+ <P.)
Section XL
General solution of earth pressure; where
seismic force being cOnsidered,
Notations used;
All nota.tions mmd in Section I will be used.
c
~,
9 Generl\l Theory on Enrtb Pre<'..8ure nud Seismio Stu-bilitT of Retuining W'lll nud Dam 1285
{ w,lisin(",-B) + q,)sin (, +8- '1') sin (,, -8) -k sin(", - B)cos '1'
p = _ l_, _ . 2 8m ct (14)
sino: s~n(o:.-cS+<p+'Po)sin(o 8) ..
and
dP _
dr;
,k
S ID"
[I1 w,lisin(c<-B)
2 sm 0:
+q,)Jcos(,+8-'1') Siu(,,-8)
-sin (, + 8-'1') cos (,,- 811 sin (8 -B) sin (", -8 + q'+ '1'.1
-[1( ,",sin (", -R ) +
2 sm 0:.
q,) sin (,+8-'1') sin (,,-8)
- k sin (,,-B) cos '1'] Icos (8 -B) sin (",-8 + '1'+'1'.)
- sin (8- B) cos (", - 8 +'1' +'1'.) I] + [sin (8 - B) sin (,,- 8+ 'I' +'1'.)]'
-[1 wil.2,siu
sin (O! -
0:
0)
+q, lsin (,+ 8-'1') sin (,, - 8)
1286 Oeuern.l Theory 011 E n"th Pret\SllrA OliO Seis.ntio Stnbility of Ret.'l.iniDR Wall ni:l<l Thlm 10
That"is
,.c2=k;:,S::;ill~(7ex':c--8:,;)~Cc0:=
8 '7'-, sin (,,- 20 + '7' + '7', + 8) = o.
11),,71 sin (0: 0) + )
( . q.
2 SID ex
Put ct-2o+qJ=,u, thcn we have
r: WeliSin(o: B) +
.
2
q.
I
SID "
. (16)
c=sin 'cos (,,+ 1"+'7',-/1)+ cos ("-'7'+ ,) sin ('7', +8)
20=0:
" + cp- t 8on- ,1~+aVb'
'" b"" a'+ "'
C" . . . . . . (16)'
a'
Substituting the known 0 ill eq. (14), we have the exact formula for earth p!es.
sUl"a, where seismic force beiug consid emd.
11 Gen~l Theon on Er.rtb Pressure And Seismfo StAbility of RelAill~ Wall R.Dd Dam 1287
f
wJhin ("-U) + qJ'f sin (, + O-'P) sin (,,-o) -kilsin (,,-8) cos 'P
. p= \ 2sina (17)
sin" siu (0 -8) siu (,, - 0+'P+ 'P.)
dP Sln"
p= __ .
d'i
i. e.
p = !w. ~ sin (" - 8)+ q. sin " l-,,_:::sin=(:;-o,-J-'P;-+~')c:s:=in",(>;:,,:.,-o::)'o-;;:-
sina-sin (a S+<p+<po) sin (S - 8)
By the same reduction as shown in Section 1, we have the height of the point
of applica.tion of the earth pressure.
hc =
( ! w.+ ~ ~
Q. ) . in (O- 97+')-
11"':"-"----;= -:=7.-:--'-...",---,,-= -"----:--
Kcos'P
. . . . . . (19)
( W.+Q.)sin(o 97+ , )-Kcos'P'
In the case when <= 0, formul.. (16), (17), (18) snd (19) will be identical
to (4), (5), (6), (7) snd (8).
c=sin 'cos (0< +'P+'1',-8) + cos (,, - 97+<) sin (97, +8)
1 288 Geuerl\l Theory on E,rtb P.res!lQ~e sud SsL<imio SlftbilUy of Rolftining WAll sud Dsm 111
. (21)
( .lw.+.lQ.)
, = /1, --:..:::...3
14, - ,-;;;--,-;.2",,- . . . . . . (24)
(W.+Q.)
In the ease when k=O, a= ~ and 8=0, we have
)
b=- icosesiu(<p+<p,) +sin(<p-,)cos'P, 1 f' . . . . . (25)
1
2o=..!!...-+tp- tan- 1 bc+aVlJ a +? . . . . . (26)
2 bl at
. . . . . . . . (27)
Section IlL
Stabilit y of ret aining w all and gravity dam, where
seismic force being eonsidered.
RetAiniug wall and gravity dam in this section are assumed to be rigid
bodies.
Art. L The direction and the magnitude of the resultant force of gravity
and earthquake.
Notations used;
g;:::accelemtion due 00 gmvity.
ct~ = roa.ximun accelera.tion du e to earthquake.
g~ =resulta.nt of g and a~ .
y, = _BStD
, 2__
" ' t ' , , , , .' , , (28)
2 T
If 8. body displaces S against the earth, which is forced to vibrate in the
motion indicated by Y.=! sin 2; t, the motion of the body will be ex-
pressed by
Y= (B - S) .
SlD - -
2", t , , , (29)
2 T
Since, we ha;ve
2"
008 - -t
T
_ 2,r(B-S) , . . , . , . . . , (31)
~.- T2
,,-,,(B
::,:,;;;-;S
"."l
"',-_ ::.2,r T'
. , , (31)'
_ 2,rCB.-S.)
""- '1'"
In the case when there is no relative displacement; we IJ&ve
1290 Geueml Theory on EArth PrOSSllrCl ml(l Seismio Stnbility of Rebt.iniI)g,WIlU nnd Dc.m 14
0:.= 2,,'B
T'
. . . (32)
A-. -IO(v
I . gf=V(g+a..f+~X
""'-- m 2.1_ .m
"'' - 0,' +0<,
.. . . . . (33)
E
... 0;. ] ~t Ao = Jh...,
g
we ha...e
l+'+'.' ~,
Fig, 6" ,
Thell we haye the 'resultant force of
graivity and earthquake,
W, = A,W and
Q.=A,Q . (35)
Art. 2. , Applica.tion .of genera.l solution of earth pressure to a. retaining
wall, where seismis foroe being considered,
If a. "Wall be rigid and fixed to the foundation so firmly that there is no
relative displacement, the earth contained in ABO will be forced to vibrate
similar to the wall aDd the foundation.
c
c'
Q c
8. "'-s' c'
,--,1--,.""r I
, . I
I
A. Fig. S.
Fig. 7.
2"'(B, - S.)
8 0011 0: ,\=
T' l 0 0 0
o (36)'
Ct .. =
2"'(B.- S.)
T' f
If the amplitude, horizontal and vertioal, of an earthquake and the displace--
ment of the wall during every half period... of the fOlIDer be known, we can
easily find out the amount of horizontal and vertical accelerations which will
be acting to Wand Qo
The period of the ea.rthquake should be measured.
Let a .. and 0:., be the vertical and horizontal accelerations acting on W and
Q. 'We have "
o W.=I.. W
Q. =I..Q
in whioh,
"20= }/(g+o:.. )"+ o:,\"-
g
Substitnting these relations in eqso (16), (17) 0 0 0 and (24), we hs.ve the,
maximum earth pressure and its height from the base.
I.) wh'sin (,,-8) +qh) sin (, +8-<1') sin (,,-o)-kh sin (,, -8) COS <I'
1 2 sin 0:
p. = -.:...---::= -=----,,.......;...,.....,,,..--:;:-7....,......--.-:----:--- , . - - - - - , (38)
sin" sin (0 -8) sin ("-0+<1'+<1'.)
I. J
11.=" '\ 3
-+- W+.lQ)
2
sin (O-<I'H)-.lK cos <I'
2, , 0 , ' (39)
i..( W +QJ sin (o -<I' +,)- K cos <I'
in which,
. . ...
1292 Gonernl Theory on Enrth Pre88llr6 and"Seismio Stn.:t>ility of &taiui.Jlg WAll And])n.m 16
c=siu .t COS (a. +<P+ tpo- 8) + sin (91,,+ 8) cos (IX-tp +:;)
j
2k s in (C'- 8)coslP
! u:hsin (cc 8) +
o 2 sin a:. q
I sin (tpo+8}
Si.uce in the case of seyere earthquake, it will be sale side if the ea.rth
p ressure be calculated by putf..ing k=O: Thus we have the maximum earth
pressure a.nd its point of action f Ol' lI. destructive earthquake.
. . (41)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (42)
in which,
2S = et+9J-tan-' bc+ at/~f+c~ . . . (43)
l} a!
a =sin(op,+ 8+ ,) }
b=cos 'cos ('" +op+ op, -8) -cos (op, + 8) cos ("'-op+ ,) . . . (43)'
Let P o be the earth pressure in ordinary condition, where 1> =0 and k=O,
by eq. (10) "We have
:'7 Gtlneml Theory on Earth PreR!OUffl "nil. 5flillmin Stability of &t.ll.ining W..U And DAm 1293
B ,. . 27r
Y=-2- S1U
T t
'I'hen we ha.ve
dy 7r 27r 2.,,' B sm
. _2,,/ . 2,,~
- - = - B" cos - - t, _ = -0:,.510 - -,
dt T T T' T T
Sioce we have the lDJU:imum velocity cba.nge,
" .
v=2-B.
T
By the theory of hydra.ulics, we have
v2 2 x2.,rB !
H'= - - =
2g 2g T'
Thus, the water pressure will increase according to the elevation of water
level by this additiooa.l head H '.
In practical case, H' will be so small that the horizontal. vibration of an
ea.rthquake can . be neglected to determine the 'Water pressure.
b) . Vertical "\ibration is concerned.
1!
I
I
.1294 Gnel'al TheOl'Y 011 Ea'fth Prt'8sure 1I.1ld Sei'llnie Stn.bility.of Retaining WftU find Dam
I'
I,
w~ , :=1.0111"
'.J \Vh'r) V(g+Q:r?+(Xh~_ g+a.~
1 e '''--''--''=':;-'-'-'--''-
9 9
Since, w'~=wr( 1+ ~ )
A The pressure intensity at any depth" will be
Fig. 9
'
p~ =
. J'"
0
p
siu~
dT] F/!w/
2sw IX
H!w' (1+~)
2sln~ 9
. (47)
P o= H'!w' . . . . . . . . . . . . . (47)'
2 sin ct
Let P be the water pressure at any instant t during an e&l-thquake, we haY8
H!w'
2SlUct
(1 + ".9 sin 2"T t). . . (48)
HZ +1LH+H,'
3
11<;= -'-;===,--.,_
(H+2H,) .
Art. 4. Resuitant force aotmg on a retaining wa.ll.
a). Rigid foundation, where resultant force acting on the base.
If the foundation is rigid and the relation bo< 0' D
is held, the motiou of the wall will be the saroe as
the vibration of the earth~
consequently the seismic
force mll be uniformly distributed on every parts of
the wall. Since the seismio force acting on a wall
is the product of the seismic aCcelera.tion and its
JI mass.
'l'a.king moment about 0' we have
Fig. 11 M-PhJlsint+tpo)+ ~loC'ASin 2; t
In which,
P=Po+(Pc-Po) sin 2; t
Therefore, we have
(J7)=Poos(a - op,)+m(ga,Sin~ I)
_ M _
b,- - - -
P rftpsin (ce+'Po) + I (Pa - P o) h" sin (a: + 'Po) + mhoa.,,) sin -Yt
.. (51)
(V)
P, cos (a-op,)+ {(P. - P,) cos ("'-op,) + mo;.! sin ~ I+mg
.,
1298 GeD6lnl Theory on Bluth Pressw:e MId Seismio Stability of ReWnlng Wall nnd DRm
. . . . . '. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (51),
T , since we ha;...-e
Above eqs. become marimum when t = _
4
_d'0_ =...L-sm8
a.
dt' L'
-
. ." "
21 Of\n8r11.1 Theory on F.t:..rlh Pressnre and Ssi<emio StAbility of RetAining Wall and Dnm 129'1
When
IT [' ="'-JlIT)'
t= J dO
'1"J Jy v coS'Y-cos6'
- d8
. 4{J "I I sin!..!!..--
. "'-J 2
sin! .:J....
2
"" .. (04)
IIT [' dO
"'-J - g- J, VIf'-,"!,
'I'hen we have
d'O + __
- __ SlU 0 " ",
<X).'" SlD l.~+ g7"- SlUv
- "" = -.P:...c.},,,,,,si,u;o(;;:
, "-,+-,'P:C<'):L
df LI2 LIS mL 12
L
.'
1298 Gellernl Theory on Enorth Pressure fl.nd Seifornio Stability of &b.iniDB Wn.U I\ud Dnm ~
Put
8 -- Of.ft-
Ie + 0'~e _.,fE,
WheI'6,
_-.Iii ~
De (V' B sin I.t + i. cos i.t)
+ 2V'.8(I.'+B)
0/=0,+1
0={1 0="1
1) t=to 2) r t= T"
4
dIJ
-=0
at
By substituting these conditions in eqs. (58) aDd (58)',
l ~=O
at
we have
By solving these symulta.neous equations, we can find the 'v alues of ah~a!,
t., and To
The resultant force acting at the heel .A will he maximum a.t the instaut,
when the wall begins rocking, since by substituting to for t we have the maxi-
mum h orizontfil and "ertica.l c9mponeuts of the resultant force.
(J1)=P, cos (a- 9',)+ (P,- P,) cos ("--9',) sin At, +m(g+ ". sin XI,) .. (59)
(H)=Po sin (O: -~o) + (P.-Po) sin (ct. -~o) sin Ato+ rna", sin Ato .. . .. (59)1
Nota.tions used,
m=mass of a 't"all
.
, ..
U-\OO Generf'i Tbeory on Enrlh Pre9'JUl'O aud Seismic stability of . Betatnillg Wa1l"~ria Dam' ..
E=force per unit area. required to :aep~
au elastio base for unit depth; .
I = horizontal sectional moment of inertia. of a
wa.ll at its base.
l'
O=center of the base, and a.lso center of
percussion.
r=ra.dius of gyration around G in the oross
-;;
sootion of a. waJl.
.
FiS 14.
ro Pi).
- m~ + m g1l.--'3... = E I- '"
at' L L
Solving, we have
:25 Genel1\l Theory on Earth Prelmlre nnd Sei9mio Stability of ReWning Wtill .tld Dnm 1301
11'",_
_
~
I (P, - p.l",sin ("'+'P.l +mli ,-mX,.
mL
l ."SlUI\.{t
sin At cos wt dt
. CtJ t d(cos"tl
Sln - cos Ct>t d (sin"t)
cit cit
= O + Dr 2!t) sin At C03 wt dt
2
J 2w -AM cos At
:Since we llaNe the general solution.
.. , .
.i' .
1302 GeDaml Theory on EArth PJ'eQ8tlr6 fl,ud Soismio St.,\bility of Re~ining . WPoU and Dam 2~
j
x= C1- Dl ~'l
2., sin 1.t sin .,t two
~ - ..d'Xt COS At
COS '
(i)~
Also, "
If
I 2w sin At cos rut
2M -.L!At cos At
d'
.~
and
.
I 2w sin At sin fIll~,
200 -.AM oos At
UN
I ulated ' lC
becae ao
~:
d Vi
(1) ),,,=0
(t=O
Thus the general solution will be detennined, but the calculation is too
difficult j since the ~ollowing method, which will be deli-veloed from the special:
case, is preferred to find the approximate solution.
In the special case when A :- O (i. e. Ct'. = 0). the genernl solution will be
found a.t once.
sin(A~VB)t
A ~ V1f
;'
21 Ganeml Tbe~ry on Etn-lh heseure nJl(\ Seismic Btnbility of ReWning WfIlI nnd DAm 1303
"=O ::: =0
By tho boundary conditions we have
{ e=o
I {
e=o
D'Ie .
0 1 = 0 and 0,= ----,~7-_=_
V B('Ie' - B )
Since we have
dx
--- ('Ie'~~ {cos VBt-cosAlI ..... .. , ., ... , . . . (65)'
dt
Where,
L
AlI?
B(X'-B)
(A SiD vEt.-VBsiD At.J-. (68
or,
(H)= p . sin (<><- 'P.)+ {(P,-P.) sin (<><- 'P.) + =.1 siD At. ... (69)
(V) =p. cos (<><-'P.)+ (P,-p.) cos (<><- 'P.) sin At. +"", ' ... : .. (69),
M
P,l',sin(",+'P.)-"",,+ LV~~~-B) [.\-sin VBt.-vEsin ),t.]
b.=--=
(V) Po cos (ct-g;o) + ( P~-P(J) cos (IX - CPo) sin :xt.,+mg .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (69)"
EID --
M P ,l"sin (<><+'P.) - mge+ v1!i ().sinvBt. -vBsiuAt.]
. L (A'-B)
+m(g + .SinAt,,)[
L
v B(A--B)
- D. IASinVBt. -VBSinAt. I- ,l
.
"
"
::
'
.
29 Ganem) Theory on Euth Pressure ADd seismio StA.bilit,. of Retaining Wall and Dam 1305
+ mLD"Io.
)...J-B [VBsin VB t - 0
"10. sin M 1 "" " " " " " " " , "70)
0 \.'
(H)=P, sin ("'- 'P,) + I(P.':-P,) sin ("'-'P,)+ - . Isin ).t, """" (71)
(V) = P, COS ('" -'P,) + I (P.- P,) COS ("-'P,) +""'-I sin ).t,+mg ' . .. (71)'
where
a). Rigid foundation where resul tant force acting on the base.
All relations held in Arl. 4 will be applied in the case of a dam, because
a dam will be forced by the pariodica.~ water pressure instead of the earth
pressure.
By the similar reductions, we haye
H;w'
2 sin 0:
=p) 1 +
1
ct"
g
sin 27T
'1'
t}
M=Poh" sin ct{l+ ~" sin ~ t}
'+mh
. . ~
or.t" sm T
1306 General ,T heory on Earth Bre8!m1'6 Rnd Seismio StRbirity of RetniniDg W"U'<im.d Dni:o. 30 ..;
M ___
' . ct +-"
P tI'jlSlU 11
-c< 8].0
--'_....l!.
2,..
-'--" 'I ' .-2.... .
+ mllvQ:A, 8m ~
y_-:-.:::T--'--'--;:---:-_T~ .
e+ b,=--=
(V) (P,C06<x+mg)11+ ~ sin i tl
We ~v.e maximum values 'When
T
t=--
4
M P).,8ina(1+ ;. )+ml.,o<.
~R)= P{l ; . ) sin ct+mo:/I. ....... (73)
PJlJlsiOO:(l-i- )+mlvx,.
(1+ ;. )(P, coo <x +mg) 1. . . . .:. . ; (73)1
(coS,,+ p ,mg)(l ~
tan'i>=--;---,----'-_L...:.-
Po(l+ ;" ) BinO'.+~A
)
j . ,
b). Rigid founda.tion where resultant force passes out. of the base.
c). Elastic foundation, where resultant force acting ot;l the base.
-
.
.
P _ . wlR.
2 sinoc
i. e.
A= 1Ioa.,
- L'
B
J. . . . . . (75)
Then we have
x= J 0 1 _ Dr 2w sin)..t sin rut dt} cos oot+ f C + D r 2w sin Xt cos rot dt t sin wt
1
1 . J 2w-AAt cos "At . \ J "2ro-AAt cos At f
.... -- ...... -- -- . --. -- . - -- -- .... -- .. -- . - -- -- .......... (75)"
x=_,.,;:D
~~~I Asin VEt-VB sinAtl "' ..... (76)
V'B(A'-B)
I. .
, '.
I
1308 Gooeral Theory on Euth I'resaIue IUld Se.ismio stabi1i9' of Retaining Wall fUld Drtm sa
Since we b.&ve the ma.ximum mOJ:ll,ent a.nd ,resultant force as the following.
or ;:P,lip sin ct+ct,.mllo sin )"to+mu[ l7JjD Ii\. sinflto - vBsi~ At"I":'e1
L (;I.' - B) , 'J
onLD;I. [. / n " /B . .
+ (;I.' B)
VBBlDV
,
t.-;l..mAt.I ... (77)
(H)=Po sin ct+m.cx,. sin A4,
If 0;; be :relatively smaJl, eq. (76) will nearly express the forced oscilla.tion
, ,
of a. dam lor which the verticaJ vibration is acting. Then"'We bave the maximllIQ
resisting moment about 0 and the resultant force as follows. .
L
AID
B(;I.'-B)
[;I. sin V'1i t, -vB sin ;l.t.1 (78)
(H)=(Po~ ; .. sin;u")SiD~+11UXASinxt,,
". (,
33 Ge.neml Theo:ry.on EaJ:th 'Pressure IW.d Seismio Stability of Re~ining WAolr Aolld Dnm 1309
d:). Numerical example of a da.m. where the upward water pressure on the =
base being neglected .
Hejght of drun = 18 m eters.
BMe ".. ." 13 meteJ:'S
T vp ".. == 4.3 meters
=95 degrees.
Cross seotiODAol tIor'OO= 155.6 sq. m.
Moment of inertin=3,8SO m 4
m. h p = 5.{S m.
r~
ht, =7.5 e = I .1 m.
r'
L =ho +-,;:;-=10.8 m.
1 X181.
Po= 2'x sin9So _162.6 Kg. tons.
W=358 tODS.
w
m . - = 36.5
(4) Ie II) d)
9
fl.) /Q)'cd
Case 1. Rigid foundation .
.- . ' - (Ii) 'aA=a,,=O'
}';g. 17.
.,
M=P.! hpsin 95 _ eW
=1,858 m. t.
1,678 _ 3.82 m.
372.2 x 1 .1837 .
..t
"1.310 Genel"l'\l Theory on EArth Preqlll'f1 And Seismio Stability of BetaininR W"U Rnd oal!!- 3{
l,t9U
bc.= 372,:! xO.8188 ",{.915 m
,
.... Case 2 . Elaat ic foundation.
"
EI",915,OOO t. mt.
. 2.... 2r
T=1.S 800. A= '1.8= 3.4.9 to= 8.{9+14.65 =0.3{63 BOO.
....,
.d.=----v-=0.1157
. ,
P ohJl9J.n 95~+mJlf#lI.---71Iears
D_ - - - -.l':mL
-,..-----_lJ.025
:1:=0.01733 m..
0.01733
.M=883-394.+915,OOOx 10.8 =1,957 m. l
_
bo= _ -,1~.'~57",",:-:_ - 4..4.3 m.
( 1.,)
372.2 1+ 9.8
W.=m ",fl' rf" sin 4-rr t. dt= m ( T", )' . .. . : ..... (80)
. T' t T 8\.".
Also we have
. W=2....Vl,'+r-(l -Cosfl)mg=mg~[.
2 2 V
11+(_1_)'_1] .... (80)'
/, ..
Since if We< lV, the wall will not overturn.
1. e.
'Wa.ter pressure and earth pressure should be ta.ken into account to ~ study. the
stability against overturning.
A dam, however, ma.y be overturned by the Same instantaneoUs ' force,
,beoa.use the da.m in consequence of its rocking monon is forced by ' an upward
FNssure of water rushed in cracks.
If the resultant forco, though instantaneous, passes near the corner of the
,base, a.n enormous pressure caused on the heel will become a motive power o
its overtnming.
A retaining wall, by these reasons, should be so designed a.s _1_ t:;.bo ; and
. 2
1
.a dam Illiould ha.ve its base so large as -=nbo in which n=from 3 to 1.5.
2
b). Stability against sliding.
Taking any horizontal section of a. wall or a dam, the horizontal component
.of all forces . on the upper po~on must be smaller than the friotion Ol" the 1'8-
.sisting shear of the said section. If a wall be construoted in one mass, wea.kest
section will be a.t the base, ill this case the frictiona.l resistance a.t the base
,should not be exoeeded by the horizontal component, which is known as (H)
in Section Ill.
In the ease of severe ~qua.ke, the horizontal force will sometimes
exceeds the frictional resistance a.t the base, eapcciaJly when the execution of the
'wall is carried in wa.ter as ordinary quay wall.
Consequently the designer must pay attention to the following articles.
A wall or a dam should be built in one mass for a certain length.
A wa.ll or a. dam must plonde suita.ble front apron or a foothold exca.vated
in the foundation in order to incr~ the stability aga.inst sliding.
c). Bearing power of the foundation.
The width of the bass of a wall or a. da.m must be so designed that the
'maximum pressure on its toe does not exceed the ultimate bearing powex of tIle
founda.tion.
If a wall be fixed in the foundation as shown in fig. 19, the max.imum
:.pressure on the toe will be determined 88 the following.
rpl = &:ugle of repose between wall and 3.pron.
rp = inclination of the resultant to vertical.
rp2= inc. of the resultant on the base to vertical.
r
,,
17 Genoral Thoo1'J' on FArlli Pres~ and Beismio StRbility of Retaining wan An~. ~m . 1313
From eq. (82) and (82)' we eon reduce the following equationS.
12 (H)-~dl'
p, = --;-;;:--Sp-';; r C'-'-
. ....-
I 6a,,( V) +p,ci' I t&n'</>,
1. . . . . . . (84)
'.
~314 .GenersT Theory on ERrth Pr&.Iau:re fWd Seismio Stability of RetniniDg' WAll 'ftnd Dam. 38
a). The upward pressure on the heel of the base, caused by its back :fill-
ing material; is dangerouS' aga.inst overturni.il.g j since we must pay' attentio~ to
eliminate the cause.
.'.':;.: ....
As sho"WD in fig. 20, the upward earth . pressure due to the wet earthen
back filL will be checked by sheet piles driven Wlder the heel (instead of toe).
As shown in fig. 21, the upward earth preSsUre on the base of a. qua.y wall
which is built in water, will be elimiuated by, Qoncrete .deposited near the heel
I .,' .
-89 Genenil ' ~eory on &rth PresstU'e stld Seismja Stability of ReWJli.Dg WAll IWd Dnm 131.5
'o r ' by an impervious course la.id between the stone ' riprap and reclaimed quick
"""d.
.Gens'ralJy spea.king, a retaining wall is but a kind of a dam, .and we must
pay the same attention to their design.
b). The wall should be pedec.tly fixed to the foundation. The execution
is very . simple for dry works, but pretty difficult for \vet 'Works.
.~~ " ',:'. :,- .. .
wellor
h"1!,,mkss
C'.,~tJ N
.!...._- _.. .
',' ...
. '~... l--,!--';; . ".
. .. ,
'Fig 22. Fig. 23.
. .
..,."r'.. ..~.
.~ ..:: .. ..( , .
.' ,. .;
I,...
c
i,
1316 Gen6ml Theory on EArth PreSsure and Soismio Stability of Retainwg 'WAll ft.Dd DNn ro.
Back filling materials should have smaller specific gravity, lEu'ger angle of
repose and la.rger cohesion in wet and dry. In the case of severe earthquake.
the collesion of back filling materials. except tlle compact clay. 'Will be disturved
by the shock.
Engineers must pay attention in the design of a retaining wall 'or a quay
"all that the total sum of the cost of the wall aud the back filling materiaJs
should be minimum.
Art. 2. ' Examples 011 the Dew design of the -quay 'wall and ba:rge .wharf.
.0
it Gen6mJ. Theory OD. Eurtb heesure nnd 8eismio Stability of ReWnillg W",U nnd Dsm 1317
steel bars or old mils, in consequenoe - we ha....e the quay wall of one mass.
The wall is fixed to the ground by concrete placed in the front and On the back
in order to. guaranty the stability ~
This design is adapted to the site, where the exeoutio"n is 6~ed in : dry
condition. This type, if tho coffer darn be ohe&p~' 'will be most ~onomical and
will be sufficiently strong against an earthquake ..
This type will be . adopted for rapid works, and . is very cheap if a Qrane
barge,. haTing larger capacity. be pnnided.
This buttress wall weighing 50 tons each will be moulded on :Shc;>re . by
reinforced concrete, then it will be pl&ced by a crane l?arge in site. Each wall
will be fi."tod by cement mortar, which is filled in a ?ambas bag .placed ..in the
j
vertical groove.
This type, if properly designed, can be guarantied against ordinary des-
tructive earthquake.
Appendix,
Study on the cause of the da.mage to the quay wa.ll of Yokahame Harbour
due to . the earthquake on September 1st. 1923.
The quay wall of the Yokohama. Custom House bad the length of 1,110
ken (6,620 ft.) allowing 13 vessels to moor a.t the sametime. The height of
the wAll was .ranging hom 32.5 ft. to 45 ft., and tho width of the base from
.iJ
" GOnerru. TheorY on Ett.rih p~ IWd Seismio StAbility of RetAining WAll fWd Datn ~~19
15 ft. to 18 ft.
The greater. part was built on the hMd olay strata., .&Dd ~e other was cou-
strueted on the rabble mound. The hard clay strata. was ..
exO&yated and
massive concrete was ~eposited by means or" a pneumatic caisson to build the
strong foundation, on which many concre~ blocks (4.5 ft. X 5 ft. x 7 ft. and
4 ft. x 6 ft. X 9 ft.) were la.id in se,emllayerso The .wall was constructed .in several
sections each h&ving 36 ft. in length. The . ,'ertical boud of each block was
reinforced by the cemeut mortar filled ill the vertical grooves, and nothing was
attempted to stiffen the horizontal bond, since the bonding power be~een
horizontal 18.ye1'8 " 'as so poor that it ",,'as easily ov~:come by the s~i~ic foroe.
No wall overturned .from its root, but &11 qu&.y w&lls except the foundation
of. statiouary wharf cranes, was forced to slide out to the front step by step
according to the vibration of the earthquake. Lower two or three courses, co-
yering 800 ken in length, were r~mained ~cause they were fixed to the hard
clay strate. by concrete, while upper layers above tllero were forced. to silde out
so far as they were thrown down in the water. '.rhe other part, covering 240 ken
in len:Jth, was forced to slide out from the root, ,vhich was merely lying on the
rubble mound or au the hard cla.y stra.ta.; a.nd moreover rel&tive disp~acement
between horh:ontal layerS had taken plaoe, and the upper p~ w reina.ining on
the lower layer,;! by o\Oerhauging about 5 feet.
PI-. 8 and PI. 9 show the typical section of the failure of the quay, which
was built on hard clay stra.ta.
Pl. 10 and Pl. 11 show the damage to the quay wa.lls whioh were built on .
the rubble mound.
Pl. 13 shows the section of the foundation of 20 ton stationary wbarf
crane, which was perfectly safe during the ea.rtb.qua.ke.
b). Calculations on the stability of the quay wall.
PI. 12 denotes the force dia.gr&m for the typica.l section of the quay, same
as shown in PI. 8.
PI. 13 indicates the force diagram for the founda.tion of the stationary wharf
orane, whioh w"" perfectly sa.fe.
Several experiments were carried to determine the bonding force (friction)
between horizontal courses of blocks, end the angle of repose of the back fil-
ling materia.l. And no great error will occur if the following results are used.
tp=4f'IJ 9'o=2":JOSO' (frictional angle bet\vgen h orizontal. courses) -=36Q
i. e. tan 4>0' 0.7
PI. 12.
"
h=29.a5 fl toJ.""l15 IOO./eu. ft.. Weight of bAok fIJI nb:)V8 water.
cx=96"24,' to l = '75 . . . . .. eubmerged. I .'
,:,,0.6512
. . ' .. 'J : ;-
b=oos 18"8' ODS 168"64.' -oJoS 22"SO' 0;)8 74."ir.I' "" -LiSSa
c -= sin 18"8' 0;)5 155<'64.' +siD. 22"30'0:18 71."32', =-0.1886
3::4.6"2' "':'
",,0.7096
b= OJIS 22"4.2'008 158"54.' -00622"SO' oos 79"8';= :-L026
c '" siD. 22"4.2'0.)8 lSSOS4.' +eiu 22"30' CJ8 79"6' =-0.!.lS76
3= S1"52'
P ... :o O.952x ',554.xO.578 .. 2,480 Ibs.
Pz = .. x36,36l)x " = 19,801) 100.
=4.5,850 Ibs.
BtIok wnter "" 885 Ibs.
Resultant P = 22,!.l8O lb-_ }
Wall =30,850 llx_ "
"" R4 makes the incWut.tion of 4SO to the vertic"lnnd Dl.ftkea ,0" to the norm,,1 line of the bnse.
Cue IV. ocJa==o=U Ordinary condttion with no earthquake.
For k=O. we hNve
0.",,0.3827 b= -1.U5 c=0.!il117
1=8,4:8'
P,l.=',6-HlCO.2'5 c: 1,1151bs.
Pz=S6,380xO.~5 =8.ooo lb!.
=
WaU {8,250. Ibs.
BuoyanOY = 15,800 lb!!.
.Resolbmt P = 10,016 lb!.
.'
Watl=32.4SO Ibs.
we hnve
tM si.u. (5 -9 0011 1
Ie"" =0.1165 tdI 1~== 8 ft. when t.he e:lcaynted plane is .erlicll!. Hence,
:a cos 9> ~.
k=O.7 1D
Pl. 13. ., :.
~"" fO'
9'~ = 22"'30'
h=19.5 ft
1=18.75 it.
I' =18 ft.
a",= 4.,000 mm 800 1 ..
For "0=0.913 tc:2Cf3f'. we have
a=0.7658
b= -LOO75
..
-
c= -0.3125
3=33'>29'
PJ. =0.913 x ',554 x 0.593
P 1 =O.913 x 15,060 x 0.593 . -'
Weight of ",I\U=0.913xSO,lSO
BlloymlCY== 0.913 x 12,290
Weight of oJ:l\lle rmd its bed = O.9~3x8,700
c). Conolusion.
It is sure that aU qua.y walls at .some weakest horizontal joint were forofl'd
t<> slide out more or less b~
the ea.rth~uake, whose :accelemtion is 0:,\=3,600
s
mm/sec'! aud Ct .. = 1,200 mm/sec , when Ct" acted downwar~s, because the resultant
force makes larger inolina.tion tItan 35 degree3 to the normal line of the base.
(tan 35 is assumed to be the frictiona.l coefficient between concrete' bl,ooks).
The foundation of tho wha.rf crane proved t6 be perfectly
. safe
. . against the
earthquake whose acceleration is Cth.=4,OOO ~Jsec'l
and a,,= -l,BOO mrnJseCZ,
because the resultant in this case makes 34 degrees to the norm,al of the base.
Since it is supposed that the maximum acceleration of the earthquake On
Sep. 1st., at the site was nearly ct,\= 4,OOO mm/;;,ec! an(l cx..=l,BOO mm/sec!.
Generally speaking, the foundation of the quay wall was suffioiently hard,
and the execution wa.s carried in good condition, but no att01.1tion was paid for
the bOlldingt; between horizontal laJe~ . If the horizontal bondings had been
stiffened by some means (concrete .blocks providing groO\'-es and tenons etc.)
the quay wa.ll would haye been not so radica.lly damaged.
By some Stlpmiol' design for which kinematic consideration is paid, a solid
.'
'7 (';renerM Thool'Y On Thrlb fussure I\lld Sei'l.tnio Stability of :&brining WAll And Dnm 1 323
quay wall as well as 8. gra.vity dam call be constructed by moderate cost and
also can be guarantied a.gainst such a.n ea.rthqua.ke as tha.t ou September 1st.
1923.
- (The End)-
,
L