0 0 21110125712161ExTN, PDF

Feasibility Report (Draft), Volume I Main Report Chapter 00- Executive Summary
Preparation of Feasibility Report For Two Laning of State Tonk-Nainwa-Keshoraipatan Road

Highways Package No. 14/SH/PPP/2014-15 Highway -IV
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
0.1 BACKGROUND
Public Works Department Government of Rajasthan, engaged in the up-gradation & widening of State
Highways/ MDRs & Mining roads across the state, intends to come across the services of technically
expert consultancy firms to prepare detailed feasibility report, detailed financial analysis & detailed
traffic survey for two laning of roads including project design, planning and project preparation, surveys,
devise suitable financing model and contract award structure for making the project viable under Private
Sector Participation, bid management and preparation of tender documents, to perform detail
engineering for the project including detailed cost estimates and land acquisition plans etc. Public Works
Department, Government of Rajasthan intends to develop the roads. So, the above department invites
offers from reputed firms to provided services for the above assignments for preparation of Detailed
Feasibility Report including detailed financial analysis and detailed traffic survey of the following roads
PACKAGE No. - 14
Length
Sr. (as per
Road No. Name of Road District
No. TOR)
km
1 Highway-I Uniara Indergarh Road (SH-29) Tonk/Bundi 25
Bundi/
2 Highway-II Lakheri Bijoliya Road (SH-29) 115
Bhilwara
Sawai Madhopur to Palighat up to State Sawai
3 Highway-III 34
Border Road (SH-34) Madhopur
Tonk - Nainwa - Keshoraipatan Road
4 Highway-IV Tonk/Bundi 113
(SH-34)
5 Mines Roads of Mandalgarh 51
a.) Berisal to Sukhpura Road (Mining Road)
Karangarh to Amadala Road
b.)
(Mining Road)
Highway-V Khakharmala to Aasuna Road Bhilwara
c.)
(Mining Road)
Marewada to Bhanas Via Pandroo Road
d.)
(Mining Road)
e.) Tilaswan to Salwatiya Road (Mining Road)
NH-12 - Laxmipura - Dora - Dabi - Ranaji
6 Highway-VI Bundi 50
Ka Guda Road
Bundi - Silor - Gararda - Bhopatpura Road
7 Highway-VII Bundi 48
(SH-29)
Sawai
8 Highway-VII Malarna Dungar to Chak Biloli Road 15
Madhopur
Total 451
Additional Sawai Madhopur Bypass Sawai
9 15
Bypass (Kota Road to Lalsot Road) Madhopur
In order to access the financial and technical feasibility, M/s L.N. Malviya Infra Project Pvt. Ltd. has been
entrusted by Public Works Department, Government of Rajasthan for the task of carrying out the
Detailed Feasibility Report for above said project sections.
L. N. Malviya Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd. 1

0.2 CONSULTANCY SERVICES
The consultancy services are to be provided in stages as brought out below:
KD
Inception Report
1
KD
Supplementary Inception Report
2
KD Report on Alignment (including proposed geometric improvements) and
3 first traffic survey
KD
Report on Land Plan Schedules and Utility Relocation
4
KD Report on Indicative GAD of structures (bridges, grade separators,
5 ROB/RUBs)
KD
Report on Environment and Social Impact Assessment
6
KD
Draft Feasibility Report and Schedules to the Concession Agreement
7
KD Final Feasibility Report
8
The Feasibility Report for each of the Highways comprising the Project shall include the following:
Sets of Drawings
Investigation Reports
Preliminary designs
Preliminary costing
Implementation schedule
1.2.1 Objectives
The objective of this consultancy is to undertake feasibility studies and prepare separate Feasibility
Reports for all Highways comprising the Project for the purpose of firming up the Authority's
requirements in respect of development and construction of the Project and Project Facilities and
enabling the prospective bidders to assess the Authority's requirements in a clear and predictable
manner with a view to ensuring:
enhanced safety and level of service for the road users;
superior operation and maintenance enabling enhanced operational efficiency of the Project;
minimal adverse impact on the local population and road users due to road construction;
minimal adverse impact on environment;
minimal additional acquisition of land; and
phased development of the Project for improving its financial viability consistent with the need to
minimize frequent inconvenience to traffic that may be caused if additional works are undertaken
within a period of seven years from the commencement of construction of the Project.
1.2.2 Scope of Services
The scope of services for each of the Highways of the Project shall comprise:
Traffic surveys and demand assessment
Engineering surveys and investigations

Location and layout of toll plazas

Location and layout of truck lay byes
Location and layout of bus bays and bus shelters
Wayside amenities
Safety
Social impact assessment
Environment impact assessment
Preliminary Designs of road, bridges, structures, etc.
Preparation of Land Plan Schedules and Utility Relocation Plans
Preparation of indicative BOQ and rough Cost Estimates
Preparation of Schedules A, B, C, D and H of the Concession Agreement.
0.3 PROJECT ALIGNMENT DESCRIPTION
The Project Road Tonk-Nainwa-Keshoraipatan starts from cross(X)-Junction with NH-12 (Jaipur-Deoli
Section) near Tonk & terminates at Cross-Junction junction with SH-33 (Kota-Lalsot Mega Highway) in
Keshoraipatan.
In Nainwa, project road is overlapping with NH-116 from Ch 44+200, which is retained. After Nainwa,
road separates from NH-116 to the left. Length of overlap is 3.470 km
At Ch 83+800, there is junction with SH-29. From this junction, road has overlap of 2.860 km with Sh-29
which is retained. Road Separates from SH-29 in Khatkad.
The Project Road as described in the terms of References is 113 Km. Actual design length is 119.005 Km.
There are a number of junctions very important. Cross(X)-Junction at km 0+000 with NH-12 (Jaipur-Deoli
Section) near Tonk, T-Junction at km 44+200 with NH-116, Y-junction with NH-116 after Nainwa, T-
junction with SH-29 at Ch 83+800, T-Junction with SH-29 in Khatkad, Cross-Junction at km 109+005 with
SH-33 (Kota-Lalsot Mega Highway) in Keshoraipatan.
The index map depicting the project road is presented in Fig. 0.1-
Figure 0.1 Index Map showing Project Road
The consultancy services for the same is to include design of best possible alignment and pavement
composition, design of bridges, culverts and other structures in addition to analysis of costs, determining
project feasibility, preparation of Land Acquisition Plan, if any, and obtaining of all requisite clearances.
Figure 0.2:- Project Alignment of Tonk-Nainwa-Keshoraipatan Road
0.4 CHAINAGE REFERENCES (EXISTING V/s DESIGN)
Table 0.1:- Chainage References (Tonk-Nainwa-Keshoraipatan Road )
Existing Chainage
Sr. Design Chainage (km)
(km) Remarks
No
From To From To

1 0+000 1+600 0+000 1+600

2 1+600 2+000 1+600 2+000 Kacholiya
3 2+000 2+600 2+000 2+600 Kacholiya
4 2+600 3+000 2+600 3+000
5 3+000 3+800 3+000 3+800
6 3+800 4+900 3+800 4+900 Sonwa
7 4+900 5+300 4+900 5+300 Sonwa
8 5+300 9+300 5+300 9+300
9 9+300 10+200 9+300 10+200 Arniya Mal
10 10+200 14+500 10+200 14+500
11 14+500 15+400 14+500 15+400 Om Binjari
12 15+400 20+000 15+400 20+000
13 20+000 27+200 20+000 27+200
14 27+200 27+800 27+200 27+800 Nagar Fort
15 27+800 29+200 27+800 29+200 Nagar Fort
16 29+200 30+000 29+200 30+000 Nagar Fort
17 30+000 31+000 30+000 31+000
18 31+000 38+000 31+000 38+000
19 38+000 38+900 38+000 38+900
20 38+900 39+400 38+900 39+400 Suwania
21 39+400 43+000 39+400 43+000
22 43+000 43+500 43+000 43+500
23 43+500 44+000 43+500 44+000 Nainwa
24 44+000 44+200 44+000 44+200 Nainwa
25 3.470 km long overlap with NH-116, Retained
26 44+200 48+300 44+200 48+300
27 48+300 48+400 48+300 48+400 Fulata
28 48+400 48+650 48+400 48+650 Fulata
29 48+650 55+900 48+650 55+900
30 55+900 56+700 55+900 56+700 Dai
31 56+700 56+950 56+700 56+950 Dai
32 56+950 57+400 56+950 57+400 Dai
33 57+400 58+000 57+400 58+000 Dai
34 58+000 64+000 58+000 64+000
35 64+000 64+900 64+000 64+900 Jaitpur
36 64+900 67+000 64+900 67+000
37 67+000 67+600 67+000 67+600 Pipliya
38 67+600 68+000 67+600 68+000 Pipliya
39 68+000 73+100 68+000 73+100
40 73+100 73+500 73+100 73+500 Motipur
41 73+500 75+300 73+500 75+300
42 75+300 75+550 75+300 75+550 Luharpur
43 75+550 75+750 75+550 75+750 Luharpur
44 75+750 83+800 75+750 83+800
45 2.860 km long overlap with SH-29, Retained
46 83+800 84+000 83+800 84+000
47 84+000 84+300 84+000 84+300 Rampuria
48 84+300 85+560 84+300 85+560
49 85+560 87+700 85+560 87+700 Ajeta

50 87+700 93+400 87+700 93+400

51 93+400 94+000 93+400 94+000 Jakhana
52 94+000 104+600 94+000 104+600
53 104+600 106+000 104+600 106+000 Mayja
54 106+000 108+400 106+000 108+400
55 108+400 109+005 108+400 109+005 Keshoraipatan
0.5 RIGHT OF WAY [ROW]

The Details of existing right of way is not available with concerned department, however, it is also not
marked on revenue maps collected from concerned department.
The revenue maps have been collected of this package except forest locations.
Proposed ROW for widening of existing road is taken 20-25 m in open areas and 15m in built-up areas
as per provision in IRC 73-1980, Table 3.
0.6 ABUTTING LAND USE PATTERN
The existing alignment is a link between Kacholiya, Sonwa, Arniya Mal, Om Binjari, Nagar Fort,
Suwaniya, Nainwa, Fulata, Dai, Jaitpur, Pipliya, Motipur, Luharpur, Rampuriya, Ajeta, Jakhana, Mayja,
Keshoraipatan. The pattern on both side of road is agricultural and built-up. The details of land use
pattern along the project road are-
Built-up - 17%
Agriculture - 76%
Open Area - 7%
Forest - 0%
The Details of Land use Pattern for Project road is as under-
Table 0.2:- Existing Land Use Pattern (Tonk-Nainwa-Keshoraipatan Road)
Existing Chainage Side Villages/ Town

S. No. Length
From To Left Right
1 0+000 1+600 1+600 Ag Ag

2 1+600 2+000 0+400 Built up Built up Kacholiya

3 2+000 2+600 0+600 Built up Built up Kacholiya
4 2+600 3+000 0+400 Ag Ag
5 3+000 3+800 0+800 Ag Ag
6 3+800 4+900 1+100 Built up Built up Sonwa
7 4+900 5+300 0+400 Built up Built up Sonwa
8 5+300 9+300 4+000 Ag Ag
9 9+300 10+200 0+900 Built up Built up Arniya Mal
10 10+200 14+500 4+300 Ag Ag
11 14+500 15+400 0+900 Built up Built up Om Binjari
12 15+400 20+000 4+600 Ag Ag
13 20+000 27+200 7+200 Ag Ag
14 27+200 27+800 0+600 Built up Built up Nagar Fort
17 30+000 31+000 1+000 Ag Ag
18 31+000 38+000 7+000 Ag Ag
19 38+000 38+900 0+900 Ag Ag
20 38+900 39+400 0+500 Built up Built up Suwania
21 39+400 43+000 3+600 Ag Ag
22 43+000 43+500 0+500 Ag Ag
23 43+500 44+000 0+500 Built up Built up Nainwa
24 44+000 44+200 0+200 Built up Built up Nainwa
25 3.470 km long overlap with NH-116, Retained
26 44+200 48+300 4+100 Ag Ag
27 48+300 48+400 0+100 Built up Built up Fulata
28 48+400 48+650 0+250 Built up Built up Fulata
29 48+650 55+900 7+250 Ag Ag
30 55+900 56+700 0+800 Built up Built up Dai
34 58+000 64+000 6+000 Ag Ag
35 64+000 64+900 0+900 Built up Built up Jaitpur
36 64+900 67+000 2+100 Ag Ag
37 67+000 67+600 0+600 Built up Built up Pipliya
38 67+600 68+000 0+400 Built up Built up Pipliya
39 68+000 73+100 5+100 Ag Ag
40 73+100 73+500 0+400 Built up Built up Motipur
41 73+500 75+300 1+800 Ag Ag
42 75+300 75+550 0+250 Built up Built up Luharpur
43 75+550 75+750 0+200 Built up Built up Luharpur
44 75+750 83+800 8+050 Barren Barren
45 2.860 km long overlap with SH-29, Retained
46 83+800 84+000 0+200 Ag Ag
47 84+000 84+300 0+300 Built up Built up Rampuria
48 84+300 85+560 1+260 Ag Ag
49 85+560 87+700 2+140 Built up Built up Ajeta
50 87+700 93+400 5+700 Ag Ag

L/H Ag, L/H Ag,

51 93+400 94+000 0+600 Jakhana
R/H Built up R/H Built up
52 94+000 104+600 10+600 Ag Ag
53 104+600 106+000 1+400 Built up Built up Mayja
54 106+000 108+400 2+400 Ag Ag
55 108+400 109+005 0+605 Built up Built up Keshoraipatan
0.7 TERRAIN
The terrain is plane/rolling along the project road. At some stretches, it is hilly.
0.8 IMPORTANT SETTLEMENTS
There are few settlements required on Project Road.
0.9 TRAFFIC
In this chapter, the report is concerned about Tonk-Nainwa-Keshoraipatan Road. Traffic Survey
Locations and Schedules were, as given below:-
Table 0.3 Different Traffic surveys and their dates of commencement
Date of Survey
Location Duration
From To
Classified Traffic Volume Count
0+500 22.11.2014 28.11.2014 7 Days/24 Hours
41+000 22.11.2014 28.11.2014 7 Days/24 Hours
49+050 22.11.2014 28.11.2014 7 Days/24 Hours
93+200 22.11.2014 28.11.2014 7 Days/24 Hours
Axle load Survey
49+050 27.11.2014 28.11.2014 24 Hours
118+650 27.11.2014 28.11.2014 24 Hours
The following ADT and PCU were observed on project road -
Table 0.4 ADT and PCU observed
Ch. 0+500 Ch. 41+000

Vehicle Category
ADT PCU ADT PCU
Two Wheeler 1786 893 1754 877
Three Wheeler 100 50 33 16
Car/Jeep 302 302 247 247
Mini Bus 2 3 1 2
Bus 24 73 30 90
Mini LCV 101 152 74 111
LCV 73 218 38 115
2 Axle 132 397 65 195
3 Axle 85 384 42 189
M Axle 37 165 28 125
Tractors 49 73 45 67
Tractor with Tralior 103 464 94 422
Cycle 83 42 56 28
Cycle Rickshaw 0 0 1 3

Animal Drawn 0 0 0 3
Horse Drawn 0 0 0 1
Hand Cart 0 0 1 2
PCU Total 2877 3215 2509 2491
Ch. 49+050 Ch. 93+200

Vehicle Category
ADT PCU ADT PCU
Two Wheeler 2221 1110 1769 885
Three Wheeler 36 18 75 38
Car/Jeep 346 346 359 359
Mini Bus 16 23 5 7
Bus 81 243 29 88
Mini LCV 107 160 85 128
LCV 48 144 25 75
2 Axle 68 203 35 105
3 Axle 73 329 15 68
M Axle 29 129 14 64
Tractors 49 73 96 144
Tractor with Tralior 178 800 150 673
Cycle 75 38 88 44
Cycle Rickshaw 3 5 0 1
Animal Drawn 0 3 4 27
Horse Drawn 2 12 1 4
Hand Cart 5 15 0 0
PCU Total 3336 3653 2751 2708
The traffic growth rate for the projected traffic is taken as 5%.
As per the projected traffic, the values of PCU are very less due to discontinuity of Project road and
poor pavement, after development of road, the traffic intensity will increase because of diverted
traffic from adjacent roads. So the project road is proposed to be upgraded.
0.10 PAVEMENT COMPOSITIONS
The existing crust of project alignment is WBM and BT layer (100-120mm thick). The
crust has been dismantled in most of the stretches.
The method of design followed is a modification of the CBR method incorporating mechanistic approach.
The empirical pavement design presented in IRC-37-2012, "GUIDELINES FOR THE DESIGN OF FLEXIBLE
PAVEMENTS" (Second Revision) has been extended to cater design traffic up to 200 MSA using analytical
design method and has been followed for this project.
The traffic used in design is in terms of the cumulative number of standard axles to be carried during the
design life of the road.
Use of the CBR method for pavement design, the sub grade strength of the new two lanes and widening

were assessed in terms of the CBR value as per the procedure prescribed in the standards.
Pavement design catalogues giving standard pavement compositions as given in IRC-37-2012 for various
CBR values ranging from 2% to 10% six levels of design traffic 10,20,30,50,100 and ISO MSA are used
with necessary extrapolations to obtain pavement thicknesses for 200 MSA.
It was observed that the adequate quantity of sub grade for design CBR of 7% is available.
Using 7% CBR for sub grade and from the curves as mentioned in IRC: 37- 2012 pavement thickness
were computed for the relevant millions of standard axles and furnished in Table 0.5.
Pavement thickness required for the above designed MSA and as per IRC guidelines is shown in following
table-
Table 0.5
Sr. Adopted MSA CBR Pavement Composition (mm)

Section
No. (%)
10 Year 15 Year BC DBM WMM GSB
Tonk-Nainwa-
1 10 15 7% 40 60 250 230
Keshoraipatan
0.11 PROPOSED BYPASSES/REALIGNMENT
There is not any proposal of bypass for this road.
0.12 ROAD JUNCTIONS/INTERSECTIONS
There are a number of junctions very important. Cross(X)-Junction at km 0+000 with NH-12 (Jaipur-Deoli
Section) near Tonk, T-Junction at km 44+200 with NH-116, Y-Junction with NH-116 after Nainwa, T-
junction with SH-29 at Ch 83+800, T-Junction with SH-29 in Khatkad, Cross-Junction junction at km
109+005 with SH-33 (Kota-Lalsot Mega Highway) in Keshoraipatan.
0.13 SUBMERGENCE
There is not any submerged major or minor bridge in the entire road.
0.14 CROSS DRAINAGE WORKS
Bridges
There is a major bridge in the project road which has been retained.
There are 15 minor bridges in the project road. 1 is retained & 14 are proposed for reconstruction.
Culverts
There are Total 78 culverts in the project road. All are proposed for reconstruction.

Table 0.6 Details of culverts and bridges
Details of Existing Structure/Culvert Details of Proposed Structure

Sr. Widt Leng Widt
Locatio Proposal
No Type of Span h of th of h of Widt Remarks
n (widening / Type of Span
. structur Arrangeme Culv culve para h
(Chaina Reconstruction/ structure arrangement
e nt ert rt pet (m)
ge) Retain)
(m) (m) (m)
1 X 1200 10
1 0+050 HPC 1 X 1200 Reconstruction HPC
mm m
11
2 1+010 Slab 1X4 Reconstruction Slab 1X6m
m
1 X 1200 12
3 2+570 Syphon 1 X 900 Reconstruction HPC
mm m
12
4 4+300 HPC 4 X 600 Reconstruction Slab 1X6m
m
12
5 4+900 HPC 3 X 900 Reconstruction Slab 1X6m
m
10.0 1 X 1200 12
6 5+300 FCW 5.50 Reconstruction HPC
0 mm m
10.0 1 X 1200 12
7 5+535 FCW 5.50 Reconstruction HPC
0 mm m
12
8 6+340 VCW 7 X 900 Reconstruction Slab 2X6m
m
1 X 1200 12 Canal
mm m crossing
1 X 1200 12
mm m
1 X 1200 12
mm m
2 X 1200 12
mm m
1 X 1200 12
13 12+060 Slab 1X3 Reconstruction HPC
mm m
12
m
2 X 1200 12
mm m
2 X 1200 12
mm m
2 X 1200 12
mm m
2 X 1200 12
mm m
12 Buried in
19 21+460 Culvert Reconstruction Slab 1X6m
m ground
2 X 1200 12
mm m
12
m
1 X 1200 12
mm m
2 X 1200 12
mm m
24 27690 MNB 2x5 Reconstruction Slab 2X6m
2 X 1200 12
25 29+680 VCW 3 X 1000 Reconstruction HPC
mm m
2 X 1200 12
26 30+070 VCW 4 X 900 Reconstruction HPC
mm m
1 X 1200 12
mm m
28 35+140 MNB 3x5 Reconstruction Slab 3X6m
2 X 1200 12
mm m
12
m
12
m


Sr. Widt Leng Widt
Locatio Proposal
e nt ert rt pet (m)
ge) Retain)
(m) (m) (m)
1 X 1200 12
mm m
1 X 1200 12
mm m
1 X 1200 12
mm m
2 X 1200 12
mm m
1 X 1200 12
mm m
1 X 1200 12
mm m
12
40 48+990 Slab 1X 4 Reconstruction Slab 1X6m
m
41 49+660 MNB 1x7,1x5 Reconstruction Slab 3X6m
1 X 1200 12
mm m
1 X 1200 12
44 52+075 Arch 1 X 1.5 Reconstruction HPC
mm m
2 X 1200 12
mm m
47 61+530 MNB 7x6 Retained
1 X 1200 12
48 65+030 Arch 1 X 1.5 Reconstruction HPC
mm m
12
m
12
50 66+390 Arch 2X2 Reconstruction Slab 1X6m
m
2 X 1200 12 Stone
mm m Masonry
1 X 1200 12
mm m
1 X 1200 12
mm m
1 X 1200 12
mm m
1 X 1200 Stone
mm Masonry
2 X 1200
56 70+140 Arch 1X3 Reconstruction HPC
mm
1 X 1200
mm
59 75+240 Arch 2X2 Reconstruction Slab 1X6m
2 X 1200
mm
2 X 1200
mm
2 X 1200
mm
2 X 1200
mm
2 X 1200
mm
2 X 1200
mm
2 X 1200
mm
2 X 1200
mm
68 78+250 Arch 1X2 Reconstruction HPC 2 X 1200


Sr. Widt Leng Widt
Locatio Proposal
e nt ert rt pet (m)
ge) Retain)
(m) (m) (m)
mm
2 X 1200
mm
2 X 1200
mm
2 X 1200
mm
1 X 1200
mm
2 X 1200
mm
1 X 1200
mm
Major 150.
77 87+775 5x30 Retained
Bridge 00
2 X 1200
mm
1 X 1200
mm
Box 2 X 1200
81 94+700 1X1 Reconstruction HPC
culvert mm
1 X 1200
mm
2 X 1200
mm
1 X 1200 Canal
mm Crossing
105+21
86 MNB 2x6 Reconstruction Slab 2X6m
5
105+40
87 MNB 1x10 Reconstruction Slab 2X6m
0
105+45 1 X 1200
88 HPC 1 X 900 Reconstruction HPC
5 mm
105+78 1 X 1200
0 mm
105+89
90 HPC 6 X 1000 Reconstruction Slab 2X6m
0
107+74 1 X 1200
5 mm
108+25 1 X 1200 Canal
0 mm Crossing
108+64
93 Slab 2 X 2.5 Reconstruction Slab 2X6m
0
108+73
94 Slab 1X4 Reconstruction Slab 1X6m
5
0.15 RAILWAY TRACKS / CROSSINGS
There is a rail road level crossing exists at Ch 108+910 on the project corridor.
0.16 TOLL PLAZA
There is proposal of 2 toll plazas on the Project road.
0.17 INVESTIGATIONS AND SURVEYS
In order to design various components of project road; following investigations and surveys have been
carried out:-

Traffic surveys
7 days traffic Survey
Axle load Survey
O-D Survey
Topographic surveys including GPS
Material Surveys & Investigations
Borrow area Identification
Road Inventory Survey
Pavement Condition Survey
Culvert and Bridge Inventory Survey
0.18 DESIGN PARAMETERS
Following design standards have been adopted as per Indian Roads Congress (IRC) Guidelines,
contained in IRC: 73, IRC: 86, IRC: 38 and IRC: SP: 23 and is given in Table below:
Table- 0.7 Design Parameters
Sl.
Item Plain/Rolling Terrain
No.
1 Design speed (kmph) 65 Kmph - 80 Kmph.
2 Land width (m) Open / Built-up area In Open areas 20 m & in Built-up areas 10-
15 m.
3 Width of carriageway (m) 7.00 m
4 Paved shoulders -
5 Unpaved shoulders 2 x 2.50 m
6 Camber/cross fall
(i) Carriageway & paved shoulders 2.5%
(ii) Earthen shoulders 3.0%
7 Maximum super elevation 7%
8 Minimum Radii of horizontal curves (m) 230m ruling /155m min.
9 Minimum length of curves (m) 150 m for every deflection angle of 50
11 Drains As per Design
12 Sight Distance As per IRC 73 & IRC 86
13 Gradient
(i) Ruling Gradient 3.33%
(ii) Limiting Gradient 5%
(iii Exceptional Gradient 6.7%
)
14. Vertical Clearance for power/ telecommunication
lines
Low Voltage up to 110 V 5.5m
Power Line up to 650V 6.0m
Electric Power line more than 650 V 6.5m
0.19 TYPICAL CROSS SECTION AND WIDENING SCHEME





0.20 RESETTLEMENT AND REHABILITATION (R & R) POLICY

The Ministry of Rural Development (Department of Land resources) has prepared the National Policy on
Resettlement and Rehabilitation for the people who will be affected by the project. The policy describes
the principle and approach to minimize and mitigate the negative social and economic impacts caused by
the project. The R & R policy broadly addresses all issues such as compensation, assistance, replacement
value, vulnerable group, etc. The policy ensures that people affected by project must be able to restore
their livelihood to the pre project level. The Project alignment is proposed in such a way with minimum
Resettlement and Rehabilitation.
0.21 COST ESTIMATE
The total project cost is calculated based on the quantity of individual item multiplied by the rate for this
item and summing up the cost of all the items.
The Project road has been considered as one homogenous section and the bill wise total project cost is
tabulated in Table below for all the packages of the project.
Table 0.8 Abstract of Cost Estimate
Bil ORIGINAL CONTRACT

l Description Amount in Figure Amount in Words
No. (INR) (INR)
A Civil Works
1 Carriage of Materials -
72,62,521.3
2 Site Clearance
7
38,24,48,005.5
3 Earthwork, Erosion Control and Drainage
0
34,63,04,669.9
4 Sub-bases, Bases ( non- bituminous) and Shoulders
6
43,81,92,581.7
5 Bases and Surface Courses (Bituminous)
9
23,98,67,242.5
6 Cement Concrete Pavements
8
7 Geo-synthetics and Reinforced Earth -
7,42,50,195.4
8 Traffic Signs, Markings & Other Road Appurtenances
5
91,02,480.0
9 Pipe Culverts
0
10 Maintenance of Roads -
11 Horticulture -
2,51,28,405.5
12 Foundations
9
5,19,65,136.7
13 Sub-structure
0
6,66,54,361.3
14 Super-structure
6
20,96,943.0
15 River Training and Protection Works
2
16 Repair and Rehabilitation -
10,00,00,000.0
17 Toll plaza - 1 nos.
0
A Total Cost of Civil Works 1,74,32,72,543.32
B Provision for Physical contingencies @ 15% of A 26,14,90,881.50
C Provision for Escalation at 6.15% on A 10,72,11,261.41
D Provision for Financing Cost @ 25% of A 43,58,18,135.83

E Grand Total (A+B+C+D) 2,54,77,92,822.07

Cost per km 2,33,73,173.91
SALIENT FEATURES
Description Existing Proposed

Terrain : Plain/Rolling
Length : Existing Length = 109.005 km Proposed Length = 109.005 km
The existing Alignment is almost Poor except The existing alignment with
Alignment :
at few locations. geometric improvements.
Design Speed : Avg. 30-40Kmph. 65 Kmph to 80Kmph.
Cross-Section : C/W Width- Varying b/w 3.0-7.0m Flexible Pavement
2-Lane with Hard shoulder in
Shoulder- 1m to 2 m
Open / Rural Area
Hence formation width varies from 5m to 2.50m Hard Shoulder + 7.00 m
11m C/W + 2.50m Hard Shoulder =
12.0m
Rigid (CC) Pavement -2 Lane in

Built-Up Area- C/W = 7.00m
CBR Considered : 5% 5%
Traffic (June 2014) : At Km 0+500 At Km 41+000 On basis of projected traffic,* From
PCU PCU Km 00.000 to Km 109.005 : 2-Lane
3215(In 2014) 2491(In 2014) with hard shoulder is considered
7369(In 2031) 5709(In 2031)
ADT-2877 ADT-2509
CVPD-351 CVPD-203
MSA- MSA-
8.32(10yr) / 4.50(10yr) /
13.52(15yr) 7.31(15yr)
At Km 49+050 At Km 93+200
PCU PCU
3653(In 2014) 2708(In 2014)
8373(In 2031) 6207(In 2031)
ADT-3356 ADT-2751
CVPD-299 CVPD-119
MSA- MSA-
5.93(10yr) / 2.10(10yr) /
9.64(15yr) 13.41(15yr)
Pavement Design
: Nil 10 / 15 Years
Life
Design MSA : 8.32/13.52 * MSA = 10
Pavement Crust : Thickness. Avg. 100mm to 120mm Flexible- Rigid-
Thickness for BC - 40 PQC - 300
widening & new DBM - 60 DLC - 150
construction WMM - 250 GSB - 150
GSB - 230

Bridges : Major Bridge 1 Major Bridge 1 retained

Minor Bridge - 15 Minor Bridge 1 retained,
14 reconstruction
Culverts : Total Culvert = 78 Nos. All are proposed for
HPC = 36 Nos. reconstruction.
Slab Culvert =14 Nos.
Box Culvert = 1 Nos.
VCW = 3 Nos.
FCW = 2 Nos.
Syphon = 5 Nos
Arch = 17 Nos.
Description Existing Proposed
Bus - Bay : Nil 36
Truck Lay Bye : Nil 4
Design has been done on the basis
ROW : 25-30m
of existing ROW.
Additional land will be required at

Land to be acquired : -
few stretches.
Forest Proposal : Nil Nil
Major Intersection : 6 6
Minor Intersection : 25 25
Flyover : Nil Nil
Grade Separator : Nil Nil
Underpasses(VUP
: Nil Nil
Cattle/Pedestrians)
ROBS : Nil Nil

RUBS : Nil Nil
Service Road : Ni, Nil
Slip Road Nil Nil
:
Protection & Others : Nil Nil
Work
Total Civil Cost
: Rs. 254.78 Cr (Rs 2.34 Cr/Km)
(Rs.)

0 0 21110125712161ExTN, PDF

Transféré par

Informations du document

Titre original

Copyright

Formats disponibles

Partager ce document

Partager ou intégrer le document

Options de partage

Avez-vous trouvé ce document utile ?

Ce contenu est-il inapproprié ?

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

0 0 21110125712161ExTN, PDF

Transféré par

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

Feasibility Report (Draft), Volume I Main Report Chapter 00- Executive Summary

Preparation of Feasibility Report For Two Laning of State Tonk-Nainwa-Keshoraipatan Road

L. N. Malviya Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd. 1

0.2 CONSULTANCY SERVICES

The consultancy services are to be provided in stages as brought out below:

1.2.2 Scope of Services

L. N. Malviya Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd. 2

Location and layout of toll plazas

0.3 PROJECT ALIGNMENT DESCRIPTION

Figure 0.1 Index Map showing Project Road

Figure 0.2:- Project Alignment of Tonk-Nainwa-Keshoraipatan Road

0.4 CHAINAGE REFERENCES (EXISTING V/s DESIGN)

Table 0.1:- Chainage References (Tonk-Nainwa-Keshoraipatan Road )

L. N. Malviya Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd. 3

1 0+000 1+600 0+000 1+600

L. N. Malviya Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd. 4

50 87+700 93+400 87+700 93+400

0.5 RIGHT OF WAY [ROW]

0.6 ABUTTING LAND USE PATTERN

The Details of Land use Pattern for Project road is as under-

Table 0.2:- Existing Land Use Pattern (Tonk-Nainwa-Keshoraipatan Road)

Existing Chainage Side Villages/ Town

L. N. Malviya Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd. 5

2 1+600 2+000 0+400 Built up Built up Kacholiya

L. N. Malviya Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd. 6

L/H Ag, L/H Ag,

0.8 IMPORTANT SETTLEMENTS

There are few settlements required on Project Road.

Table 0.3 Different Traffic surveys and their dates of commencement

The following ADT and PCU were observed on project road -

Table 0.4 ADT and PCU observed

Ch. 0+500 Ch. 41+000

L. N. Malviya Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd. 7

Ch. 49+050 Ch. 93+200

0.10 PAVEMENT COMPOSITIONS

L. N. Malviya Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd. 8

Sr. Adopted MSA CBR Pavement Composition (mm)

0.11 PROPOSED BYPASSES/REALIGNMENT

There is not any proposal of bypass for this road.

0.12 ROAD JUNCTIONS/INTERSECTIONS

0.14 CROSS DRAINAGE WORKS

L. N. Malviya Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd. 9

Table 0.6 Details of culverts and bridges

Details of Existing Structure/Culvert Details of Proposed Structure

L. N. Malviya Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd. 10

Details of Existing Structure/Culvert Details of Proposed Structure

L. N. Malviya Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd. 11

Details of Existing Structure/Culvert Details of Proposed Structure

0.15 RAILWAY TRACKS / CROSSINGS

0.16 TOLL PLAZA

There is proposal of 2 toll plazas on the Project road.

0.17 INVESTIGATIONS AND SURVEYS

L. N. Malviya Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd. 12

0.18 DESIGN PARAMETERS

Table- 0.7 Design Parameters

0.19 TYPICAL CROSS SECTION AND WIDENING SCHEME

L. N. Malviya Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd. 13

L. N. Malviya Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd. 14

L. N. Malviya Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd. 15

L. N. Malviya Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd. 16

L. N. Malviya Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd. 17

0.20 RESETTLEMENT AND REHABILITATION (R & R) POLICY

0.21 COST ESTIMATE