Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 2

PROJECT 3: My Rhetorical Issue Analysis

ASSESSMENT RUBRIC

Claims
15% of Project 3 Grade
4 This rhetorical issue analysis makes clear, precise, and elegant claims of definition, conjecture,
quality, and policy about the authors research topic.
3 This rhetorical issue analysis makes clear and precise claims of definition, conjecture,
quality, and policy about the authors research topic.
2 This rhetorical issue analysis makes vague or imprecise claims of definition, conjecture,
quality, and policy about the authors research topic.
1 This rhetorical issue analysis makes claims about the authors research topic but does not address
all four stasis-theory questions: definition, conjecture, quality, and policy.
0 This rhetorical issue analysis does not make claims about the authors research topic.

Evidence
40% of Project 3 Grade
4 This rhetorical issue analysis includes precise, informative, and elegant presentations of evidence
for every claim of definition, conjecture, quality, and policy. All 10 magazine/newspaper articles
reviewed by the author in Project 2 are cited.
3 This rhetorical issue analysis includes precise and informative presentations of evidence for every
claim of definition, conjecture, quality, and policy. All 10 magazine/newspaper articles reviewed by the
author in Project 2 are cited.
2 This rhetorical issue analysis includes vague or poorly developed presentations of evidence
for every claim of definition, conjecture, quality, and policy. All 10 magazine/newspaper articles
reviewed by the author in Project 2 are cited.
1 This rhetorical issue analysis does not provide evidence for every claim of definition, conjecture,
quality, and policy. OR All 10 magazine/newspaper articles reviewed by the author in Project 2 are
not cited.
0 This rhetorical issue analysis does not present any evidence for the claims of definition, conjecture,
quality, and policy.

Rebuttals
30% of Project 3 Grade
4 This rhetorical issue analysis provides clear, well-supported, and elegant rebuttals of plausible
objections to all of the authors claims of definition, conjecture, quality, and policy.
3 This rhetorical issue analysis provides clear and well-supported rebuttals of plausible objections to
all of the authors claims of definition, conjecture, quality, and policy.
2 This rhetorical issue analysis provides vague or poorly supported rebuttals of plausible objections to
all of the authors claims of definition, conjecture, quality, and policy.
1 This rhetorical issue analysis does not provide rebuttals of plausible objections to all of the authors
claims of definition, conjecture, quality, and policy.
0 This rhetorical issue analysis rebuts objections to all of the authors claims of definition, conjecture,
quality, and policy; however, these objections are implausible or irrelevant to the authors research
topic.

Word Choice
5% of Project 3 Grade
4 This rhetorical issue analysiss use of word choice is consistently precise and vividly descriptive.
3 This rhetorical issue analysiss use of word choice is consistently precise and descriptive.
2 This rhetorical issue analysiss use of word choice is occasionally vague or inappropriate.
1 This rhetorical issue analysiss use of word choice is consistently vague or inappropriate.
0 There is no rhetorical issue analysis.

2017 Ann M. Lawrence, Ph.D. ENC 1101


annlawrence@sar.usf.edu Page 1/2
Sentence Structure
5% of Project 3 Grade
4 This rhetorical issue analysiss use of sentence structure is consistently varied and engaging.
3 This rhetorical issue analysiss use of sentence structure is occasionally varied and engaging.
2 This rhetorical issue analysiss use of sentence structure is consistently repetitive yet effective.
1 This rhetorical issue analysiss use of sentence structure is consistently ineffective.
0 There is no rhetorical issue analysis.

Formatting
3% of Project 3 Grade
4 This rhetorical issue analysis meets all of the formatting requirements: at least 2 double-spaced
pages (not including the APA cover page and references), Times New Roman, 12-point font, 1-inch
margins, APA style, file format: .doc, .docx, .pdf.
3 This rhetorical issue analysis meets all of the formatting requirements, except for a few APA errors.
2 This rhetorical issue analysis meets all of the formatting requirements, except for many APA errors.
1 This rhetorical issue analysis does not include 10 magazine/newspaper article annotations.
0 There is no rhetorical issue analysis.

Sentence-Level Language Conventions


2% of Project 3 Grade
4 This rhetorical issue analysiss use of sentence-level language conventions (e.g., grammar, spelling,
punctuation) does not detract from the reading experience and enhances it.
3 This rhetorical issue analysiss use of sentence-level language conventions (e.g., grammar, spelling,
punctuation) somewhat detracts from the reading experience.
2 This rhetorical issue analysiss use of sentence-level language conventions (e.g., grammar, spelling,
punctuation) frequently detracts from the reading experience.
1 This rhetorical issue analysiss use of sentence-level language conventions (e.g., grammar, spelling,
punctuation) makes it nearly impossible to read.
0 There is no rhetorical issue analysis.

2017 Ann M. Lawrence, Ph.D. ENC 1101


annlawrence@sar.usf.edu Page 2/2