Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Before the Court is the matter of the hearing on petitioners motion for temporary restraining
order seeking to alter the status quo of the minors custodial status presently in the custody of the Office
of Refugee Resettlement. Since having set the hearing for Tuesday, November 7, 2017, the government
Case 5:17-cv-01105-FB-HJB Document 16 Filed 11/02/17 Page 2 of 3
has indicated it would file a written response by Friday, November 3, 2017. Petitioners shall have until
Because temporary restraining order requests are usually addressed on the pleadings, the Court
has decided to postpone any hearing until such time as the Court determines if it is even necessary.
From the pleadings presently before the Court filed by petitioners, it appears to be admitted that
R.M.H., a minor, and her mother, Felipa De La Cruz, are in the United States illegally. The well settled
standard for obtaining extraordinary injunctive relief, whether temporary, preliminary or permanent,
is to show, among other things, a substantial likelihood of success on the merits and, at the permanent
injunction stage, that the minor child and her mother would prevail on the merits, i.e., to remain in the
United States. See Lewis v. S.S. Baune, 534 F.2d 1115, 1121 (5th Cir. 1976).
The Court assumes for purposes of this discussion that petitioners have shown a substantial
threat of irreparable injury. However, the Court is not satisfied at this time that the public interest
would not be impaired if the immigration laws are not enforced or enforced only selectively. See
Enrique Bernat F., S.A. v. Guadalajara, Inc., 201 F.3d 439, 442 (5th Cir. 2000).
Significantly important to the Court is whether R.M.H. and her mother, Felipa De La Cruz, will
have success on the merits in being allowed to stay in the United States notwithstanding their illegal
status. While the Court has great empathy for R.M.H. and her mother, the law does not allow the Court
Petitioners are requested to address the Courts inquiry of how R.M.H. and her mother will be
successful on the overarching issue of the law and their illegal status. It would also be helpful if the
government would advise the Court as to why Felipa De La Cruz has not been apprehended and subject
-2-
Case 5:17-cv-01105-FB-HJB Document 16 Filed 11/02/17 Page 3 of 3
to the same deportation procedures as apparently are underway for R.M.H. Mother and daughter then
petitioners latest filing, the Opposed Motion to Advance Hearing on Motion for Temporary Restraining
Order (docket no. 14), specifically to address the actual physical location of R.M.H. and what
specialized medical care is being provided to her given her recent surgery and cerebral palsy.
It is so ORDERED.
_________________________________________________
FRED BIERY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
-3-