1 vues

Transféré par raveneyesdead

Quenching preheating by light fields

- ORIGINS_magazine-Higher_Dimensions_In_Science.pdf
- Chapter 4 - Dynamic Analysiss
- Oded Hod, Roi Baer and Eran Rabani- Magnetoresistance of nanoscale molecular devices based on Aharonov–Bohm interferometry
- The Ever-Changing Big Bang Story
- Chapter 4 - Dynamic analysis.ppt
- qftbookmath
- Fluid Flow Analysis
- G-I-3
- 2. TIFR - 2017
- A Matlab Toolbox for Robotic Manipulators
- 10.1.1.30.3000
- PhD.ii .S08 1qv6vpt
- Mc Paper
- Case Study: pelican robot
- Astronet_ScienceVision
- Set of Problems in Quantum Mechanics
- Phys 214 Spr 2013 Midterm Solutions
- Lecture 11: The Big Bang
- Particle Velocimetry in High Speed Flows
- Axions as Dark Matter Particles

Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 9

1

Institute of Theoretical Physics, Faculty of Physics,

University of Warsaw ul. Pasteura 5, 02-093 Warsaw, Poland

2

University of Florida, Department of Physics, P.O. Box 118440, Gainesville, FL 32611-8440

(Dated: June 22, 2017)

In this paper we investigate the role of additional light fields not directly coupled to the background

during preheating. We extend our previous study that proved that the production of particles

associated with such fields can be abundant due to quantum corrections, even for the massless states.

We also obtain the expression for the occupation number operator in terms of interacting fields which

includes the non-linear effects important for non-perturbative particle production. We show that

adding too many light degrees of freedom without direct interactions with the background might

attenuate or even quench preheating as the result of back-reaction effects and quantum corrections.

arXiv:1701.00015v3 [hep-ph] 20 Jun 2017

paper and conclude.

Post-inflationary particle production is a very complex

stage in the evolution of the universe that mixes pertur-

bative and non-perturbative processes [15]. Usually it II. PARTICLE PRODUCTION IN TERMS OF

is divided into two main stages: INTERACTING FIELDS

perturbatively produced states typically corre- Usually the occupation number operator of produced

spond to the fields directly interacting with the particles is defined in terms of the creation and annihi-

inflaton, they do affect the mass term of the lation operators as Nk ak ak . This definition assumes

inflaton through back-reaction effects that produced states can be treated as free fields which

means that their equations of motion are linear. How-

b) reheating (thermalization) - when the inflaton de- ever, in general fields associated with the produced par-

cays perturbatively and produced particles end up ticles interact with other fields which spoils linearity and

in thermal equilibrium with a well-defined temper- results in the non-perturbative production. In that case

ature. it is not clear how to define the number operator properly.

In this section we address this issue and describe parti-

Interesting is the question about the impact of the

cle number using the theory of interacting fields which

additional fields, especially light ones, on preheating.

takes into account the non-linear effects. To compare

Their presence in the theory during [68] and after in-

these results with a simpler theory of a free field with

flation is important for multi-field inflation models and

time-dependent mass term see Appendix A.

for curvaton scenarios [911]. For recent reviews of post-

inflationary particle production see [12] or [13]. For simplicity let us consider a real scalar field with

In our previous study [14] we showed that light fields the Lagrangian of the form:

which are not coupled directly to the background can be

1 1

produced due to quantum corrections and their abun- L= ()2 m20 2 V [, (other fields)], (1)

dance can be sizeable, even for the massless case. In 2 2

this paper we want to develop these results addressing where m0 is a bare mass of and V is a general potential.

the problem of additional light degrees of freedom and Then equation of motion reads:

avoiding at the same time the infinite growth resulting

from the approximation used previously. The crucial dif- V

ference between present considerations at that of [14] lies 0 = ( 2 + m20 ) + = ( 2 + M 2 ) + J, (2)

in the fact that presently the inflaton is massive.

The outline of the paper is as follows. In Section II 1

where M is a physical mass that can depend on time

we develop the formalism necessary to describe the cre-

ation of particles in the presence of interactions, with and

without time-varying vacuum expectation value (vev) of

the considered field. In Section III we apply our formal- 1 In general physical mass can depend not only on time but also

ism to a number of well-motivated cosmological scenarios, on space coordinates. For simplicity we consider only the time-

including a sector of very light fields. In Section IV we dependent case as it is more common in cosmological considera-

compare our results with the earlier ones [14], discuss the tions.

2

and should be a c-number, and These relations are equivalent to the Bogoliubov trans-

formation for the wave function

V

J (m20 M 2 ) + (3) (t)

k = k as as

k k k , (12)

is a source term that can be an operator. where as

k denotes the asymptotic value of the mode k ,

Formal solution of (2) can be presented in a form of as in out

k = k , k .

the Yang-Feldman equation

Lagrangian (1) corresponds to the Hamiltonian

Z x0

(x) = (t) (x) d4 y i[(t) (x), (t) (y)]J(y),

Z

(4) 1 2 1 1

t

H= d3 x + ()2 + m20 2 + V . (13)

2 2 2

where the first term describes an asymptotic field defined

at x0 = t which satisfies the free field equation of motion Substituting (8) into the above results in a quite compli-

cated expression for the Hamiltonian which can be sim-

0 = ( 2 + M 2 )(t) . (5) plified by choosing the Bogoliubov coefficients of the form

In case that does not have a vev, the (t) can be de- in 1 in 1

|k |2 = k

+ , |k |2 = k , Arg(k k ) = Arg in

k

composed into modes 2k 2 2k 2

(14)

d3 k ikx (t) (t) 3

Z

where

(t) (t) (t)

(x) = e k ak + k ak (6)

(2)3

in in 2 2 in 2

k |k | + k |k | , in in 2 2 in 2

k (k ) + k (k ) . (15)

fulfilling harmonic oscillator equation

(t) (t)

Then the Hamiltonian with diagonalized kinetic terms

0 = k + k2 k (7) reads

R d3 k

with k |k|, k k 2 + M 2 and obeys the inner prod- H = (2) 3 k

(t) (t)

ak ak + 12 (2)3 3 (k = 0) + (16)

(t) (t)

uct 2 relation: k , k = 1.

+ d3 x 12 (m20 M 2 )2 + V ,

R

From (4) also the relation between two asymptotic

fields defined at different times x0 = t and x0 = tin can which indicates that the operator

be derived

(t) (t)

(t) in

Z t Nk (t) ak ak (17)

(x) = (x) d4 y i[in (x), in (y)]J(y), (8)

tin

really plays the role of the occupation number. This is

in

where we denoted (x) (tin )

(x). Evaluating the in- because in the system which has a potential energy par-

(t)

(t) (t)

ticle number N would be described classically as

ner product of the above equation with k : , k ,

we can obtain the Bogoliubov transformation for annihi- H Veff V0

lation operators [14] N= , (18)

E

t

where H is the total Hamiltonian, Veff an effective po-

Z

(t) in in

ak = k ain

k +k ak d4 y i[k ain

k +k ak , (y)]J(y), tential, V0 a zero-point energy and E is an one-particle

tin

(9) energy. Therefore particle number is just the kinetic en-

where ergy of the system divided by the one-particle energy.

Substituting (9) into (17) and using (14), (15), we can

(t) (t)

k = k (t, tin ) (k , ink = k (t, tin ) (k , in

k ), k ) finally obtain the expression for the occupation operator

(10) in terms of the interacting fields as

and the normalization condition reads

1 +

Nk (t) + Nk (t)

|k |2 |k |2 = 1. (11) Nk (t) = (19)

2

3 in in

k and k are constrained by the relation:

2 We use the following definition of the inner product:

(A, B) i(A B A B). |in 2 in 2 2

k | |k | = k .

3

scribe the time evolution of distributions nk = hNk i/V

Nk+ (t) = 1

kk k + k2 k k (2)3 3 (k = 0),(23) for each type of produced states we need to determine

the time evolution of bilinear products of field operators

Nk (t) = i k k k k + (2)3 3 (k = 0), (24)

hk k i, hk k i and hk k i. Equations of motion for

these operators can be derived by calculating their time

where we defined the Fourier transformation as derivatives and using (2)as

Z

k (t) d3 xeikx (t, x).

(25) hk k i = hk k i + hk k i (27)

(t) (t) (t) (t)

hk k i = hk k i + hk k i

Since Nk (t) = ak ak ak ak , Nk+ denotes a total

and Nk a net number of particles with momentum be- = hk k i k2 hk k i hk Jk i (28)

tween k and -k. In the case of a complex scalar this

(t) (t) (t) (t)

hk k i = hk k i + hk k i

expression changes to Nk (t) = ak ak bk bk , where

(t) = k2 (hk k i + hk k i) hk Jk i hJk k i

bk is an annihilation operator for anti-state, but (23) and

R d3 k (29)

(24) still hold. In such a case (2) 3 Nk corresponds to

In the

case where has a non-vanishing vev hi Z

Jk d3 xekx J(t, x).

in

0 0in , we just have to replace hi in (25) to (30)

obtain the proper expression for the occupation number.

Physical mass of is determined by the relation:

MULTI-SCALAR SYSTEMS D E

+ d3 xeikx k dVd(x)

R

To obtain numerical results for some specific models to remove the infinite part of the mass correction.

we follow the procedure described in Section II. We are

especially interested in time-evolution of particle number

density for each considered species: A. Two scalar system

d3 k hNk i

Z

n(t) = , (26) At first we apply our formalism to the simple theory

(2)3 V

consisting of two scalar fields

where V is the volume of the system, and in time- 1 1 1 1 1

dependence of the background (inflaton). We consider L= ()2 + ()2 m2 2 m2 2 g 2 2 2 .

2 2 2 2 4

a time range and starting from the initial state we solve (32)

equations of motion for all the species and calculate their We assume that it is the field

that has time-varying vev

number density. Then we move to a slightly later time

and plays the role of inflaton, 0in 0in = h(t)i, while

and repeat the procedure taking into account the back- is another scalar field with vanishing vev that can be,

reaction of previously produced states on the evolution of for instance. a mediator field between the inflaton and

the background (given by the induced potential coming the Standard Model. We also assume m m . The

from non-zero energy density) and all the species. details of the calculation in this system can be found in

Before we present numerical results for specific mod- Appendix B.

els, let us focus on a subtlety in calculation of the particle Asymptotically, when quantum effects can be ne-

glected, we can choose a vacuum solution for (32) of the

form

4 The zero point term can be regarded as the volume of the system hi = 0 cos(m (t t0 )), (33)

because

Z Z where 0 denotes the initial amplitude of the oscillations,

(2)3 3 (k = 0) = d3 xeikx |k=0 = d3 x = V. (20) hi(t = t0 ) = 0 . When this trajectory crosses the non-

p

Therefore, we can also find distribution operators:

adiabatic area for : |hi| < m |0 |/g, the mass of

+

becomes very small and kinetic energy of the background

Nk 1

n+

k = V = k

1

+ k2 V1 k k 1,

V k k

(21) field is transferred to the field . This results in the

creation of particles with the distribution [5]

Nk 1 1

n

k = V = i V k k V k k + 1. (22)

2

gmk |

nk = e 0| , (34)

4

where k is a momentum of a particle. Once particles scalar field domination phase this means that gv > 3H,

are produced and trajectory of hi goes away from the

for matter domination: gv > 32 H, while for radiation

non-adiabatic region, the energy density of particles

domination: gv > 2H.

can be represented as Following [15] and the analytical method of estimating

the number density of producing particles in the expand-

d3 k

Z

g|hi| nk , (35) ing universe presented there for which

(2)3

3/2

which corresponds to the linear potential acting on hi 5 1

n(j) (1)

n 3

j1

, (38)

describing the backreaction effects. Then trajectory of 2 j 5/2

hi goes back towards the origin and particles can be

produced again both due to the oscillatory behaviour of where j denotes the number of oscillations, we can see

hi and backreaction. the agreement with our results. If we take j 10 as in

(10)

In the Figure 1 we show an example of the numerical the Figure 1 and n 1 106 , we can see that the

(j)

results for the Lagrangian (32). According to [5] the first oscillation phase indeed finishes when 12 m2 hj i2

production of particles results in the number density (j)

ghj in .

(gm h(0)i)3/2

n(1)

4 109 , (36)

(2)3 Im t

other hand, it is difficult to obtain the analytic results

for indirect production products, like hi. But

one can see in the Figure 1 that for the considered La- pgv 1

2

w H0

3(1+ )

the production of particles associated with the inflaton is

in t0

t

small for generic choices of parameters. Therefore in this non-adiabati

system it is a good approximation to neglect the quantum

part of and the production of its fluctuation.

10-5

10-9

n(t)

in comparison with the Hubble time.

10-17

10-21

0. 2.104 4.104 6.104 The distribution of the produced states is not thermal

but, assuming that the whole energy is transferred to the

t

light states which interact with each other and with other

n (t) n (t) particles not present in the simplified Lagrangian, we can

naively estimate the maximal reheating temperature as

FIG. 1: Time evolution of number density of produced states 30 1/4

for g = 0.1, m = 0.001M , (t = 0) = M , (t = 0) = 0 in TRmax

R

, (39)

two scalar system. Scale M 0.04MP L , where MP L denotes g 2

the Planck mass MP L 1.22 1019 GeV, is chosen to be close

to the unification scale and allows us to stay in agreement where R is energy density of the relativistic particles (in

with the observational data. our case or and ) and g describes the number of rel-

ativistic degrees of freedom (g O(102 )). In our system

the coupling is big enough to describe energy density as

In our considerations we neglect the expansion of the = mn and without contradicting our assumptions we

universe which is valid assuming that the mean time the can choose the masses as in Table I. Final estimation of

trajectory spends in the non-adiabatic region is smaller TRmax is also presented in Table I.

than the Hubble time, see Figure 2. This means that:

1 2

< , (37) B. System with the additional light sector

gv 3H(w + 1)

where H is a Hubble parameter and w = p is a barotropic Usually when describing preheating light fields not

parameter describing the content of the universe. For the coupled directly to the inflaton are neglected. But it

5

ing temperature for two choices of mass. Mass of 10-8

is set to m = 5 1014 GeV. Number densities for each

state correspond to the results from Figure 1, meaning that 10-13

n(t)

n 3.96 102 GeV3 and n 8.2 109 GeV3 .

m [GeV] [GeV4 ] TRmax [GeV] 10-18

700 5.7 106 2 102 0. 2.104 4.104 6.104

t

n (t) n (t) n (t)

produced through an interaction with some other state FIG. 3: Time evolution of number density of produced states

in the system with additional light sector for g = 0.1, y = 1,

coupled directly to the background that is produced res-

n = 1, m = 0.001M , (t = 0) = M , (t = 0) = 0.

onantly. Furthermore, if there are many additional light

degrees of freedom, one can expect that energy transfer

from the background to the light sector during preheat-

ing might be sizeable. In this section we focus on such 1.0

tion through the indirect interaction with the background

0.6

||

field.

We can describe such a situation by extending (32) 0.4

with n light or massless fields n (m m , m ) that

0.2

are not coupled to the background at the tree-level

0.0

0. 1.104 2.104 3.104 4.104 5.104

L = 21 ()2 + 12 ()2 12 m2 2 12 m2 2 14 g 2 2 2

t

+ n 12 (n )2 n 12 m2 n2 n 14 y 2 2 n2 . (40)

P P P

n=1 n=2 n=5 n=7 n=10

fields do not have a vev: hi = hn i = 0. Then particles FIG. 4: Envelope of the time evolution of the background hi

are produced resonantly and as we mentioned before we for g = 0.1, y = 1, m = 0.001M , (t = 0) = M , (t = 0) = 0

for different numbers of additional light fields: 1, 2, 5, 7.

can expect production of n through the interactions with

.

The physical mass of n is given by

R d3 p 1 The reason why the energy transfer can be stopped

M2 = m2 + 12 y 2 (2) 3 V h p p i 1

2p in this case can be understood as follows. The physical

+O(y 4 , y 2 g 2 , g 4 ), (41) mass of in the system is given by

R d3 p 1

M2 = m2 + 12 g 2 hi2 + 12 g 2 (2) 1

q

where p p2 + M2 and V denotes the volume of 3 V hp p i 2p

+ 12 y 2 h np np i 1 4 2 2 4

2p + O(y , y g , g ). (42)

evolution via hp p i operator in their mass term. V

n

We show the results for only one additional field in

Figure 3. One can see that all the states are produced and

Considering an approximation Xp iXp Xp for

their number density is abundant. If the final number X = , n , one can find that

density of is comparable to the one for (n n ) D E

its presence may even quench the preheating process by 1 1 1 1 (+)

V hXp Xp i 2X 2X V N Xp . (43)

terminating the energy transfer. The reason that can p p

be produced so efficiently is the strong coupling between Thus, once or n are produced at the same time they

and that enhances the back-reaction effects. also generate s effective mass 5 which results in par-

We would expect that most of the energy would be ticle production area becoming narrower. This leads to

transferred to n fields as they are very light and the

process is energetically favourable. But we can prove

that the more light species we include, the larger the

final value of |hi| becomes and, in other words, the less 5 These mass correction terms describe a square of plasma fre-

energy from the background goes to the light fields, see quency discovered by I.Langmuir and L.Tonks in the 1920s which

Figure 4. is a critical value for which the wave of can enter Xs plasma

6

10-3

TABLE II: Energy densities and upper limits on reheating

temperature (both in GeV) for two choices of and mass.

10-4

Mass of is set to m = 5 1014 GeV. Number densities for

each state correspond to the results from Figure 3, meaning

n (t)

that n 1.82 109 GeV3 and n 9.91 106 GeV3 . 10-5

10-6

5 3 3 1

125 100 1.21 10 1.24 10 1.21 10 0.93 10

700 125 1.21 105 6.94 103 1.51 103 1.26 101 10-7

0. 2. 104 4. 104 6. 104

t

10-7

the production of other species. Too many n particles

n (t)

produced through indirect coupling to the background 10-9

prevent the production of particles directly coupled to

the background, . 10-10

It is interesting to investigate the impact of both cou-

plings - g that couples to and the background hi 10-11

and y that couples additional fields n to , on the fea- 0. 2. 104 4. 104 6. 104

tures of preheating. Varying the coupling y for fixed g t

leads to the conclusion that the initial stage of preheat-

10-5

ing does not depend on y coupling for and states.

It only influences the final abundance of produced and 10-7

states - the bigger y is, the smaller number density of n (t)

these states we observe, see Figure 5. For the impact of 10-9

y is quite opposite - both initial and final stages of pro-

duction are strongly influenced by the value of y. This 10-11

time the bigger y is, the larger number density of we

observe which also results in more effective energy trans- 10-13

0. 2.104 4.104 6.104

fer to the background as y coupling drops, see Figure 6.

t

Also, for choices of parameters resulting in n n we

y=0.1 y=0.2 y=0.5

can observe quenching of the energy transfer from the

background. y=0.7 y=1

Our study may seem similar to the process of instant

preheating [16, 17], where the system of three fields - FIG. 5: Time evolution of number density of produced states

background , interacting with the background and , and for g = 0.1, n = 1, m = 0.001M , (t = 0) = M ,

some other field not coupled to , is considered. In- (t = 0) = 0 and different values of y coupling. Values y = 0.7

stant preheating relies on the fact that particles pro- and y = 1 correspond to quenching of parametric resonance.

duced within one-time oscillation of decay immediately

to before the next oscillation of . So states can be

or not, because

(+) also produced even though there is no direct interaction

d3 p hNk i

Z

between and . In our work the mechanism of pro-

(2)3 2Xp V duction is different - due to the quantum corrections, not

nX

is proportional to M if X particles are massive enough (nX the decay, and quenching of the preheating comes from

X

is Xs number density). Moreover, if one considers the massless a plasma gas effect here rather than the rapid decay.

thermal equilibrium distribution with the temperature T :

1 1

(+)

hNXp i = 2 p/T Table II presents TRmax and energy densities for each

V e 1

state for the considered model under assumption that

(factor 2 corresponds to the degrees of freedom for momentum = H or = H, H being the Higgs field playing the

k and k particles), it corresponds to the thermal mass of the role of the mediator or the light field. We can see that

form:

Z

d3 p 1 1

!

T2 additional light sector that quenches preheating rises TR

3

hXp pX i . lowering the number density of particles at the same

(2) V 2Xp 6

time.

7

1.0 10-3

10-5

0.8

10-7

n(t)

0.6

||

10-9

0.4 10-11

10-13

0.2

0. 1.104 2.104 3.104

0.0 t

0. 1.104 2.104 3.104 4.104 5.104

n (new) n (old)

t

n (new) n (old)

y=0.1 y=0.2 y=0.5

1.0

y=0.7 y=1

0.8

FIG. 6: Envelope of the time evolution the background hi for 0.6

||

g = 0.1, n = 1, m = 0.001M , (t = 0) = M , (t = 0) = 0

and different values of y coupling. For y = 0.7 and y = 1 we 0.4

can observe the quenching of the preheating.

0.2

0.0

0. 1.104 2.104 3.104

IV. DISCUSSION AND SUMMARY t

new old

In our previous work [14] we presented a formalism

for describing particle production in a time-dependent

FIG. 7: Comparison between time evolution of number den-

background. It turned out it possesses one drawback -

sity of produced states (upper ) and the background hi

there exists a secularity in the number density of mass- (lower ) obtained with a new and old methods for g = 1,

less states that can be a product of approximating the m = 0.001M , (t = 0) = M , (t = 0) = 0. New denotes

fields by their asymptotic values. In this paper we have the interacting theory described here and old - asymptotic

developed more accurate description by expressing the approximation presented in [14].

number operator in terms of interacting fields. Figure 7

compares the two methods for the Lagrangian (32). The

new method avoids artificial secularity caused by time in-

tegral of the interaction effects with the Green functions

not work well and this indicates that preheating might

seen before. The old method seems to overestimate the

be quenched if there are many degrees of freedom of light

production at the late stage because it includes inverse

fields which are connected to the background indirectly.

decay processes, whereas the new one takes into account

mass correction terms. However, the results with secu-

larity are still applicable at the early stages of particle This work has been supported by the Polish NCN grant

production process. DEC-2012/04/A/ST2/00099, OC was also supported by

As the application of the new method in this paper the doctoral scholarship number 2016/20/T/ST2/00175.

we investigated the role of additional light fields coupled SE is partially supported by the Heising-Simons Funda-

indirectly to the background during resonant particle tion grant No 2015-109. OC thanks Bonn Bethe Centre

production processes such as preheating. In particular, Theory Group for hospitality during the completion of

we considered models with a scalar field interacting this paper.

with the background hi through its mass term and

with n light fields n . In order to describe particle

production in the system, at first we defined number

operator in terms of interacting fields and then we Appendix A: Particle production in free fields

theory with time-varying mass terms

solved numerically their equations of motion. In case of

a few additional light fields, their production can be also

resonant through the quantum correction to their mass Let us consider a real free scalar field with the time-

term and their final amount can be sizeable. However, dependent mass term:

many degrees of freedom of these extra light fields can

prevent s and also n s resonant particle production. 1 1

As a result, energy transfer from the background does L= ()2 m2 (t)2 . (44)

2 2

8

The solution of the equation of motion can be decom- with the coefficients satisfying

posed into

in 1 in 1

Z

d3 k ikx |k |2 = k

+ , |k |2 = k , Arg(k k ) = Arg in

k .

(x) = e k ak +

a (45) 2k 2 2k 2

k k

(2)3 (59)

Then the occupation number can be expressed as

where k = k (x0 ) is a time-dependent wave function

which satisfies k 1

Nk (t) = h0|Nk |0i = |k |2 = . (60)

p 2k 2

0 = k + k2 k (k k 2 + m2 ), (46) Appendix B: Two scalar system

- details of the calculation

and ak , ak are annihilation and creation operators. The

vacuum state |0i is defined by the relation ak |0i = 0 and In the system described by the Lagrangian 1, we have a

the commutation relations background field hi and two quantum fields: hi,

. The set of differential equations for distributions reads

[(t, x), (t, x0 )] = i(x x0 ), (47)

0

[(t, x), (t, x )] = [(t, x), (t, x )] = 0, 0

(48) 0 = hi + M2 hi (61)

[ak , ak0 ] 3

= (2) (k k ), 0

(49)

hk k i = hk k i + hk k i (62)

[ak , ak0 ] = [ak , ak0 ] =0 (50)

hk k i = hk k i k 2

hk k i (63)

give an inner product relation of the form: (k , k ) = 1.

hk k i = k 2

(hk k i + hk k i) (64)

Using (45) we can represent the Hamiltonian as

Z hk k i = h k k i + hk k i (65)

1 2 1 1

H = d3 x + ()2 + m2 2 (51) h k i = h k i 2 h k i

k k k k (66)

2 2 2

h k k i = 2

k (h k k i + hk k i) (67)

d3 k 1 h

Z

= 3

k (t) ak ak + ak ak

(2) 2 where the source terms are absent because of our choice

i

+k (t)ak ak + k (t)ak ak , (52) of physical masses

d3 p

Z

1 1 1

where M2 = m2 + g 2 h p i ,(68)

2 (2)3 V p 2p

k (t) |k (t)|2 + k2 (t)|k (t)|2 , (53) 1

M2 = m2 + g 2 hi2

k (t) 2k (t) + k2 (t)2k (t). (54) 2

d3 p

Z

1 2 1 1

In order to diagonalize the Hamiltonian + g h p i . (69)

2 (2)3 V p 2p

d3 k 1

Z

H = k (t) a

a + a a

k k (55) In order to obtain the above formulae, we applied an

k k

(2)3 2 approximation

d3 k

Z

1 3 3

= k (t) ak ka + (2) (k = 0) (56) hp1 p2 p3 p4 i = hp1 p2 ihp3 p4 i + O(g 2 ) (70)

(2)3 2

1

[ak , ak0 ] = (2)3 (k k0 ), [ak , ak0 ] = [ak , ak0 ] = 0, (57) hXp Xp0 i = (2)3 3 (p p0 ) hXp Xp i (71)

V

Then the number operator Nk ak ak is well-defined all

for the quantum fields X = , . Momentum conserva-

the time. Following [18], we can obtain the new operators

tion indicates that hXp Xp0 i = Cp (2)3 3 (p p0 ), where

by the Bogoliubov transformation

Cp is a proportionality factor. For p0 = p: hXp Xp i =

ak = k ak + k ak (58) V Cp , hence Cp = V1 hXp Xp i.

[1] L. Kofman, A. Linde, A. Starobinsky, Phys. Rev. Lett. [2] L. Kofman, A. Linde, A. Starobinsky, Phys. Rev. D 56

73 (1994) [hep-th/9405187]. (1997) [hep-ph/9704452].

9

[3] J. H. Traschen and R. H. Brandenberger, Phys. Rev. D A. Mazumdar, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 60 (2010) 27

42 (1990) 2491. [hep-th/1001.2600].

[4] A. D. Dolgov and D. P. Kirilova, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 51 [13] M. A. Amin, M. P. Hertzberg, D. I. Kaiser and

(1990) 172 [Yad. Fiz. 51 (1990) 273]. J. Karouby, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 24 (2014) 1530003 [hep-

[5] L. Kofman et al., JHEP 05 (2004) hep-th/0403001. ph/1410.3808].

[6] T. Kobayashi, S. Mukohyama, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) [14] S. Enomoto, O. Fuksinska, Z. Lalak, JHEP 03 (2015)

[astro-ph.CO/1003.0076]. [hep-ph/1412.7442].

[7] T. Matsuda, JCAP 1204 (2012) [hep-ph/1204.0303]. [15] K. Enqvist, D. G. Figueroa and R. N. Lerner, JCAP

[8] K. Kohri, T. Matsuda, JCAP 1502 (2015) 1301, 040 (2013) [astro-ph.CO/1211.5028 ].

[astro-ph.CO/1405.6769]. [16] G. Felder, L. Kofman, and A. Linde, Phys Rev D 59

[9] K. Enqvist, M. Sloth, Nucl. Phys. B 626 (2002) (1999) 123523 [hep-ph/9812289].

[hep-ph/0109214]. [17] S. Tsujikawa, B. Bassett, and F. Viniegra JHEP 19

[10] D. Lyth, D. Wands, Phys. Lett. B 524 (2002) (2000) [hep-ph/0006354].

[hep-ph/0110002]. [18] B. Garbrecht, T. Prokopec and M. G. Schmidt, Eur.

[11] T. Moroi, T. Takahashi, Phys. Lett. B 522 (2001) Phys. J. C 38, 135 (2004) [hep-th/0211219].

[hep-ph/0110096].

[12] R. Allahverdi, R. Brandenberger, F. Y. Cyr-Racine and

- ORIGINS_magazine-Higher_Dimensions_In_Science.pdfTransféré parRandall G. Leighton
- Chapter 4 - Dynamic AnalysissTransféré parazr32
- Oded Hod, Roi Baer and Eran Rabani- Magnetoresistance of nanoscale molecular devices based on Aharonov–Bohm interferometryTransféré parPrem_Swift
- The Ever-Changing Big Bang StoryTransféré pareustoque2668
- Chapter 4 - Dynamic analysis.pptTransféré parDimple Sharma
- qftbookmathTransféré parJagannathan Sathyamoorthy
- Fluid Flow AnalysisTransféré parKrishna Sodari
- G-I-3Transféré parRavi Kiran Goteti
- 2. TIFR - 2017Transféré parsampannkumar
- A Matlab Toolbox for Robotic ManipulatorsTransféré parEmin Ersoy
- 10.1.1.30.3000Transféré parErnesto Delfino Aguirre
- PhD.ii .S08 1qv6vptTransféré parrizal123
- Mc PaperTransféré parPaneendraBhat
- Case Study: pelican robotTransféré parMøhãmêdŸøušêf
- Astronet_ScienceVisionTransféré parNicolas Epchtein
- Set of Problems in Quantum MechanicsTransféré parAishwarya Maurya
- Phys 214 Spr 2013 Midterm SolutionsTransféré parBrianKo
- Lecture 11: The Big BangTransféré parapi-25958671
- Particle Velocimetry in High Speed FlowsTransféré parhyperliz
- Axions as Dark Matter ParticlesTransféré parHoang Bao Tran Tan
- m1_10Transféré parHamdi Sever
- Rpp2009 Rev Electromag RelationsTransféré parAnonymous UrVkcd
- Exterior Differential Systems and Euler-Lagrange PDEs (Math.dg_0207039)(Draft, 2002)(219s)Transféré parBartolome Antonio Pereira
- OPJ_2012123109084364Transféré partimmkou
- Raul Guantes and Stavros C. Farantos- High order finite difference algorithms for solving the Schro¨ dinger equation in molecular dynamicsTransféré parImasmz
- Keyboard ShortcutsTransféré parNurul Mukhlisah AbDal
- AIIMS 2001Transféré parpravinkhartad
- ArticleTransféré parAnonymous wJhO5dS9Xz
- Art-quat Lag and HamTransféré parSud Predanta
- HW1_2014Transféré parProtik Das

- Timing Aware Dummy Metal Fill MethodologyTransféré parraveneyesdead
- Automatic Differentiation for Tensor AlgebrasTransféré parraveneyesdead
- Galileo ionosphere profile coincident with repeat plume detection location at EuropaTransféré parraveneyesdead
- Isomorphism problems for Hopf-Galois structures on separable field extensionsTransféré parraveneyesdead
- Continuity of Hausdorff Dimension Across Generic Dynamical Lagrange and Markov Spectra IITransféré parraveneyesdead
- Dark matter self-interactions from the internal dynamics of dwarf spheroidalsTransféré parraveneyesdead
- A Critique on "Asynchronous Logic Implementation Based on Factorized DIMS"Transféré parraveneyesdead
- Pseudoalgebras and non-canonical isomorphismsTransféré parraveneyesdead
- Thermal transitions, pseudogap behavior and BCS-BEC crossover in Fermi-Fermi mixturesTransféré parraveneyesdead
- Evaluation of different WRF microphysics schemes: severe rainfall over Egypt case studyTransféré parraveneyesdead
- Majorana Stripe Order on the Surface of a Three-Dimensional Topological InsulatorTransféré parraveneyesdead
- Pulsar Science with the SKATransféré parraveneyesdead
- Truncated quantum Drinfeld Hecke algebras and Hochschild cohomologyTransféré parraveneyesdead
- A control analysis perspective on Katz centralityTransféré parraveneyesdead
- New nonperturbative scales and glueballs in confining supersymmetric gauge theoriesTransféré parraveneyesdead
- journal.pone.0010605.pdfTransféré parraveneyesdead
- Recurrence Analysis as a tool to study chaotic dynamics of extreme mass ratio inspiral in signal with noiseTransféré parraveneyesdead
- A reflection principle for minimal surfaces in smooth three manifoldsTransféré parraveneyesdead
- Signatures of Nitrogen Chemistry in Hot Jupiter AtmospheresTransféré parraveneyesdead
- Perturbative Renormalization of Wilson line operatorsTransféré parraveneyesdead
- From condensed matter to QCD: a journey through gauge theories on board of a variational toolTransféré parraveneyesdead
- Legendre Analysis of Differential Distributions in Hadronic ReactionsTransféré parraveneyesdead
- A Unified Game-Theoretic Approach to Multiagent Reinforcement LearningTransféré parraveneyesdead
- Self-resonance after inflation: oscillons, transients and radiation dominationTransféré parraveneyesdead
- High Energy Resummation of Jet ObservablesTransféré parraveneyesdead
- Computing by nowhere increasing complexityTransféré parraveneyesdead
- Adaptive coordination of working-memory and reinforcement learning in non-human primates performing a trial-and-error problem solving taskTransféré parraveneyesdead
- 1701.00010Transféré parmez00
- Rational Inference: The Lowest BoundsTransféré parraveneyesdead

- Advanced Capital BudgetingTransféré parAnders Bender
- Maravilla vs. Rios.docxTransféré parJohn Aguirre
- Reproduction and Heredity NotesTransféré parmceldownea
- Good Shepherd ANCC Weekly BulletinTransféré parRichard Ciullo
- dct.psTransféré parRajeev Srivastava
- Bohum Workshop 20130606 Religion Outside Text DraftTransféré parБенеамин Симеонов
- SodiumBenzoate.pdfTransféré paryotta024
- PNF Techniques in the Upper ExtremityTransféré parsanalcrazy
- Normal Chaos of Family Law Dewar MLR 1998Transféré parCrystalWu
- An Economy for the 99%: It’s time to build a human economy that benefits everyone, not just the privileged fewTransféré parOxfam
- Synergi Plant Release NoteTransféré parfaraj405
- danapinellibrowncv2015Transféré parapi-282527778
- Opp to MTLSTransféré parbryllaw
- Arabia Before MuhammadTransféré parwebwalas
- Southerlies Introductory Letters Friends&FamTransféré parJaimee Ruth Ligan
- DiodeTransféré pardadadabababa
- Modes of Investment of IBBLTransféré parMussa Ratul
- Two Alternative Approaches for Selecting Performance Measures in DEATransféré parDavid Adeabah Osafo
- Midterm2mgt 201Transféré parIrfan Shahid
- A Study on ‘Factor Analysis’is One of the Suitable Tools of ‘Multivariate Analysis’for Consumer Behaviour in Marketing ResearchTransféré pararcherselevators
- msds co2Transféré parDery Rachmandani
- 31026182 Technical ManualTransféré parBắp Huuthong
- quadratic equationsTransféré parapi-400216304
- Notas Sobre AlthusserTransféré parLucas Schiappacasse Rodriguez
- d-levelsTransféré parNei Lima
- BananaTransféré parlemonsquare120530
- Informed Design of Educational Technologies in Higher Education Enhanced Learning and TeachingTransféré parluke
- Conceito de Chi Igbo.pdfTransféré parFábio Costa
- Necessary Optimality Conditions for Approximate Minima in Unconstrained Finite Minmax ProblemTransféré parInternational Journal of Latest Research in Engineering and Technology
- Varady NoraTransféré parDejan Jovanov