Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
DESIGN OF AQUEDUCT
2 Stream Particulars:
Now proposed as
2 vent 7.00 x 4.50 m clear span for stream flow.
with SLRB for continuty of inspectionpath.
Trough level = 71.790 m
Roof level = 71.450 m ( C.B.L-trough thickness - sealing coat)
Floor level = 67.050 m Existing
III - 1
Size of Haunch = 0.075 x 0.225 m
Trough level = 71.790 m
Bottom level of Trough = 71.450 m
III - 2
5. Transitions ( canal flow )
Normal bed width of canal = 3.750 m
Width of the trough = = 3.750 m
13.360
67.05
22.0 22.0
Stream flow
3 4 5 6' 6
1 2 Canal Flow
13 13 7 8
10.250
2/3
There fore H = 113.316
23.1
H = 2.887 m
+ 69.937
2.887 1.5:1
+ 67.050
22 m
Maximum Flood discharge = 113.316 cumecs
Maximum Flood Level at the end of transition = 69.937 m
Floor level = 67.050 m
Depth of flow available = 2.887 m
Area of flow = (22.00 + 1.5 x 2.887 ) x 2.887
= 76.016 sq.m.
Velocity = 113.316 / 76.016
= 1.491 m/sec
III - 2
V2/2g = 1.491 2 / ( 2x 9.81 )
= 0.1133 m
MFL at 8 - 8 = 69.937
TEL at 8 - 8 = 69.937 + 0.1133
= 70.050 m
III - 3
Section 7 - 7: (Just inside the transition at the exit end)
+ 69.911
2.861
+ 67.050
22
71.450 71.150
69.697
2.647 15
+ 67.050
13.36 m
III - 4
Loss of head due to gradual expansion =
= 0.3 x ( 0.4843 - 0.1652 )
= 0.0957
frictional losses S = V2 n 2/ R 4/3
x L V= Average velocity = 2.441
R average = 2.115
n Value = 0.018
Length = 13
S= 0.0019 x 13.00 = 0.0092
2.7150
The barrel roof level is 71.450 which is more than M.F.L at section 6-6 i.e + 69.697
Hence Barrel Runs partially
Section6' - 6' : (Just inside the barrel at the exit end)
71.450
71.15
+ 69.697
15
2.647
+ 67.050
13.36 m
Section 5 - 5: (Just inside the barrel at the location of pier under trough.)
71.45
71.15
+ 69.646
15
III - 5
2.596
+ 67.050
12.36 m
69.646
2.596
67.050
12.36 m
Assume a depth of flow of 2.596 m
Area A = 12.36 +13.398 x 2.596
2
= 33.434 sq.m.
Velocity V = 113.316 33.434
= 3.389 m/sec
Wetted perimeter = 12.360 + ( 2.00 x 1.0198 x 2.596 )
= 17.655 m
V2/2g = 3.389 2 / ( 2x 9.8 )
= 0.5855 m
Head loss due to change in velocity = 0.3 ( 0.5855 - 0.585 )
= 0.0000
Friction Losses:
Average Area A = (33.43 + 33.434 )/ 2
= 33.434 sq.m
Avg.Wetted perimeter p = 18 m
R = A/P
III - 6
= 33.434 17.655
= 1.894 m V= Average velocity = 3.389
frictional losses S = V n /R
2 2 4/3
x L R average = 1.894
n Value = 0.018
Length = 13.000
= 0.021
=1/ x x @
TEL x 4-4 =x 70.231 + 0.021
= 70.252
69.880
2.830
67.050
13.36
III - 7
= 2.875 m/sec
V /2g
2
= 2.875 2 / ( ( 2x 9.8 )
= 0.4214 m
70.225
3.175
67.050
22 m
67.250 2.975
III - 8
67.050
66.975
III - 9
= 1.705 h3/2 + 10.5 h1/2
ENERGY LINES
(Line diagram)
4 1
3 2
U/S
D/S Canal Waterway
AT FSL 3.75
7.50 71.790 71.790 7.50
17.000
5.000 m 3 5.000 m
4
2 1
III - 10
= 73.054 m
III - 11
Section : 3 - 3 (Just Inside the exit of waterway)
III - 12
Mannings Roughness coefficient (n) = 0.018
S = 0.7954 x 0.018 2
0.7448 2/3
S = 0.00030
III - 13
Length of waterway = 17.000 m
Loss of head in the waterway portion from section 2 - 2 to 3- 3
= 0.0003 x 17.00
= 0.0052 m
Velocity = 3.685
7.092
= 0.520 m/s
Velocity Head @ section 1-1 = V2
2g
= 0.520 2
1.5 :1 1.258 2 x 9.81
= 0.014 m
3.750
III - 14
Maximum scour level = 70.447 - 4.862 = 65.586 m
D/S
1 / 3
Mean scour depth = q 2
1 . 34
f
q= 113.316 = 5.151 cumecs
22.00
III - 15
R= 3.241 m
For Canal
U/S 1 / 3
q 2
Mean scour depth = 1 . 34
f
A cutt off wall of 1.50 m is provided at the u/s of Canal i.e 70.290 m
D/S
1 / 3
Mean scour depth = q 2
1 . 34
f
q= 3.685 = 0.655 cumecs
5.63
R= 0.820 m
A cutt off wall of 1.50 m is provided at the D/s of Canal i.e 70.290 m
III - 16
13.36
68.450
III - 17
m/sec
m
-0.484
III - 18
0.000
III - 19
m/sec
m
III - 20
0.000
mm wearing coat
III - 21
III - 22
AT FSL
III - 23
III - 24
III - 25
Average of coarse and fine sand
III - 26
Avg length= ( bed width +width at fsl)/2
m
III - 27
8. DESIGN OF TROUGH SLAB:
0.250
0.60
2.190 1.25
0.04
0.340 0.225
0.075 3.750
III - 12
10.1 DESIGN OF SIDE WALL OF TROUGH: x + -
0.250
0.6
Mix adopted
3.750 Stress in steel
1.25 Q
2.190 J
n
0.04
0.225
0.075
0.225
Total height of side wall = 0.60 + 1.25 + 0.04
= 2.190 m (or) 219 cm
The side wall is designed as a simply supported beam in between the abutment & piers with
clear span of 7.00 m to support the vertical load due to own we
the load coming from the trough slab and the water in the trough. The side wall is also checked fo
Assuming the width of beam = 25 cm
Clear span = 7.000 m
Top width of abutment = 0.900 m
Width of pier = 1.000 m
Width of bearing = 0.494 m
Clear cover to beam = 0.050
assume the dia of Main reinforcement = 20 mm
Effective depth of beam = 2190 - 50.0 - 10
Where
'd' is the effective depth of the beam and
'b' the breadth of the compression face
The clear distance between lateral supports = clear span = 7.00
= 700
i) 60b = 60 x 25
ii) 250 b2 / d = 250 x 2.93
Mininum of above i and ii = 733.57 cm greater than
HENCE SAFE
Check for vertical deflection:
As per para 23.2.1 of IS 456 : 2000 the vertical deflection limits may generally be assum
the span to depth ratio is less than 20 for Simply supported spans up
20x 10/span for Simply supported spans gre
Span = 700.00
III - 13
Eff. depth 213.00
= 3.29 < 20
HENCE SAFE
LOADS (per m run) :
i) Dead load of side wall = 2.190 x 0.25 x
ii) Weight of trough slab = 0.225 x 3.75 /2 x
ii) Wt. of sealing coat = 0.04 x 3.75 /2 x
v) weight of haunches = 0.075 x 0.225 /2 x
v) weight of fillets = 0.075 x 0.225 /2 x
i) weight of water = 1.85 x 3.75 /2 x
x x / x/ x x x /+/ x / x x
III - 14
Away from water face
3.75 m width
+ free board
= 1.850 m
= 562.5 kg/m
= 100 kg/m
III - 15
= 662.5 kg/m
- /
III - 16
- /
= M20
= 1900 Kg/cm2
= 10.263 C = 70 Kg/cm2
= 0.890 m = 13.333
= 0.329
+ 0.225 + 0.075
= 2130.0 mm
= 213.0 cm
= 7.494 m
m
cm
= 1500 cm
= 733.6 cm
greater than 700 cm
III - 17
HENCE SAFE
2500 = 1368.75 Kg
2500 = 1054.69 Kg
2500 = 187.50 Kg
2500 = 21.09 Kg
2500 = 21.09 Kg
1000 = 3468.75 Kg
Total weight: 6121.88 Kg
2
x 100 / 8
x 25
129.42 cm
x x /
III - 18
9. Design of Canal aquaduct Abutment
TBL 73.640
W8
1.85
w1 w1' +71.790
71.72 W7 0.340
+71.150 +71.450
0.494
W6 w2
5.740 P1 W9 1
W3
5.100
5
0.250
P2 W5 W4
A 0.820 67.05 SBL
3.420 w4'
w5' 1.000 2.190
0.3 1.600 1.000 1.820 +66.050 0.04
B W10 0.500
+65.550
C 4.420
5.020
0.250
Density of concrete RCC = 2.500 t/m 3
Total Load
III - 13
Load (t)
Load Description L.A
Hor. Ver.
III - 14
= 1.85 x 1.00 + 0.525 x 2.400 +4.215 =
1.100 1.100
Lever arm = M V
= 131.103 49.053
= 2.673 m
Load (t)
Load Description L.A
Hor. Ver.
III - 15
1.100 1.100
Lever arm = M V
= 175.711 60.407
= 2.909 m
III - 16
Ecentricity = Lever arm - base width /2
= 0.699 m
Allowable ecentricity = b/6
= 0.737 m
> 0.699 m
Hence Ok
Load (t)
Load Description L.A
Hor. Ver.
Lever arm = M V
= 226.955 68.211 t
= 3.327 m
III - 17
= 0.817 m
Allowable ecentricity = b/6
= 0.837 m
> 0.817 m
Hence Ok
III - 18
Design of Bed Blocks under trough:
1. Weight of trough including Side walls, wearing coat, honches and Fillets
Which is Permissible.
Adopting the bed blocks in VRCC M 20
1.00
10 No.s 16 mm Bars
Providing 1% of G.S.A. = 1 x 30 x 50.60
100
= 15 Sq. cm
III - 19
0.494
0.60
1.250
0.225 0.340
3.750
= 21.867 t
= 16.850 t
= 2.876 t
= 0.647 t
= 0.863 t
= 55.417 t
= 98.519 t
= 0.3643 t/m
III - 20
Moment (t-m)
25.259
1.401
20.664
11.592
9.554
3.777
1.613
4.056
14.655
20.783
17.749
131.103 t - m
III - 21
7.042
Moment (t-m)
25.259
1.401
20.664
11.592
4.504
9.472
14.036
0.467
1.613
4.056
20.651
30.477
31.520
175.711 t - m
7.374
III - 22
Moment (t-m)
28.479
1.629
23.616
12.802
4.864
10.758
16.498
3.096
2.218
5.218
0.284
0.083
15.120
25.777
36.017
40.495
226.955 t - m
7.899
III - 23
= 43.102 t
= 55.42 t
Total Load = 98.52 t
size
0.3 x 2.5
+ 0.266
t
0.494
0.506
0.30
1.00
No.s
Section X-X
III - 24
0.02
W7 TBL 73.640
73.565 W1
w3 72.975
0.49 72.675
W2
00
7.590 W6
W5
71.15 5.925 stresses at Base max
W8 31.134
W4
w4'
A 1.70 1.0 0.82 67.050 stresses on soil max
w5' 1.820 w4'' 1.000 22.438
0.300 0.3 66.050
0.5 B 4.520 w9
C 65.550
5.120
III - 17
min
3.648
min
9.510
III - 18
11.DESIGN OF PIER
+ 71.790
0.040
0.225 + 71.450
0.075 71.150
1.000
SMFL + 69.646
4.900
SBL + 67.050
0.5 0.3 1.000 0.3 + 66.550
0.5 0.3 1.600 0.3 + 66.050
0.5 + 65.550
2.200
1.000 5.550
4.550
6.150 6.750
stresses at
stresses on
1.600
2.200
III - 18
DESIGN OF PIER
+ 71.450
III - 19
12 DESIGN OF PIER FOR SLRB
Moment of inertia I = 22 x D4
7 64 4
= 22 x 1.3
7 64
= 0.1403 m 4
III - 19
4
= 18.098 m 2
3
Zxx = 3.142 x 4.8
32
= 10.859 m3
Zyy = 10.859 m3
III - 20
RCL + 73.640
0.075 Deck slab
0.590
72.175 1.000
2.529
1.3
6.025 SMFL + 69.646
2.596
SBL + 67.050
1.300 0.90
+ 66.150
1.500 0.30
+65.850
4.800 0.30
+65.550
0.3 +65.250
5.400
III - 21
Reaction calculations
Taking moments about C
Ra x 7.49 = 11.4 x 6.80 + 2.700 x 3.60 +2.70 x
Ra = 12.549 t
Rb = 14.469 t
Ra +Rb = 27.017 t and Ra - Rb = 1.920 t
Maximum reaction
Dead loads = 73.561 t
Dead load +Live load = 100.578 t
III - 22
1.3 1.8
0.15 0.5 0.825 0.5
e
2.125
0.51
1 0.245 m
1.3
Maximum live load Ra-Rb = 1.920 + 1.544 = 3.464 t
Eccentricity = 0.51 0 = 0.255 m
2
Moment = 3.464 x 0.255 = 0.883 t-m
III - 23
= 0.7535 t
Case A+B total moment due to wind force on super structure and on Live load
Moment at the base of the column = 6.8420 + 21.52 = 28.364 t-m
Moment at the top of the soil = 7.384 + 22.96 = 30.343 t-m
Case 2 As per 212.6 of IRC -6 :2000 the wind force shall not be less than
450 kg/m acting @ kerb level i.e + 73.865
Height up to column base 73.865 - + 66.150 = 7.715
Height above footing 73.865 - +65.550 = 8.315
Wind force = 7.98 x 450 / 1000
= 3.591 t
Moment at the base of the column = 3.591 x 7.715 = 27.70 t-m
Moment at the top of the soil = 3.591 x 8.315 = 29.86 t-m
Case 3 As per 212.7 of IRC -6 :2000 the wind force shall not be less than 240 kg/m2 is considered
4.1
+ 67.050 0
1.5
12.6.1 Water force across the direction of streamflow case 1 transverse +65.550
Pressure @ MFL @ + ( + 69.646 )= 52 k v sin 20
2 0
12.6.2 force due to water currents along the direction of stream flow as per para 213.2.0 of IRC (Case 2 )
Pressure @ MFL @ P = 52 k v 2 cos200
= 52 x 0.66 x 22.966 x
= 740.672 kg/m
III - 25
Moment at the base of the column = 1249.812 x (1.731 + 0.90 ) =
1000
The moment obtained in case (1) should not be less than the moments due to net hydrostatic pressure with a difference of
250 mm in water levels on opposite faces of column ( As per 213.6 of IRC bridge code ) as below
250 mm
MFL + 69.646
2.596 1.3 69.396
2.346
SBL + 67.050
1.300 0.900
+ 66.150
0.600
+ 65.550
Depth of flow in stream = 2.596 m
M1 = 10.361 t-m
2
M2 = 1/2 x ( 2.346 ) ( 2.346 /3 +
0
= 8.164 t-m
M1 - M2 = 2.198 t-m
Govering moments @ 66.150 = 1.716 t-m
Govering moments @ 65.550 = 2.198 t-m
Sno Vertical loads and moments Loads with out with 15 % buoyancy Lontudinal moment
1 From super strucure
2 Bearing pedestals 132.30 131.10
3 Bed blocks
4 Live loads
5 Live load eccentricity 23.563
6 Effect of transverse eccentricity
7 Braking force (Momnt)
8 Water currents 3.288
9 wind force 28.36
Resultant with out wind effect = 132.303 131.10 26.851
Resultant with wind effect = 132.303 131.10 55.215
Resultent B .M with out wind effect 2 2
Bending moment with buoyancy = 26.851 + 31.128 = 41.108 t-m
2 2
Bending moment with out buoyancy = 23.563 + 29.412 = 37.686 t-m
0.000
Resultan BM with wind effect 0.000
Bending moment with buoyancy = 2 2
55.215 + 31.128 = 63.385 t-m
0.000
Bending moment with out buoancy = 2 2
51.927 + 29.412 = 59.678 t-m
0.000
Sno Vertical loads and moments with out with 15 % buoyancy Longitudinal moment
1 From super structure
Bearing pedestal
Bed block 158.137 146.604
Live load
2 Effect of transverse eccentricity 23.563
3 Braking force
III - 27
4 Water currents 4.038
5 Effect of wind force 30.34
Resultant with out wind effect = 158.137 146.604 27.601
Resultant with wind effect = 158.137 146.604 57.943
2 2
Bending moment with out buoyancy = 23.563 + 31.920 = 39.675 t-m
0.000
Resultan BM with wind effect 0.000
Bending moment with buoancy = 2 2
57.943 + 34.117 = 67.242 t-m
0.000
Bending moment with out buoancy = 2 2
53.906 + 31.920 = 62.647 t-m
= 92.98 + 155.6
Max = 248.56 t/m 2
8.738 + 3.654
Max = 12.392
Min = 5.084
B)When canal is running full and traffic allowed on the road
Stresss in the column base
= 131.103 + 41.108
1.423 0.242
= 92.14 + 169.7
Max = 261.84 t/m2
Min = -77.56 t/m2
Stress on soil
146.604 + 43.884
18.098 10.859
8.101 + 4.041
Max = 12.142
III - 28
Min = 4.059
8.738 + 5.769
Max = 14.507
Min = 2.969
= 92.14 + 261.7
Max = 353.80 t/m 2
8.101 + 6.192
Max = 14.293 t/m 2
III - 29
= 92.982 + 169.699
500 667
0.186 + 0.2544
13273.23 - Asc
assuming 0.8 % of bd Area of steel = 106.186 cm2
Ac = 13167.04 cm2
P = 860105.237 Kg
= 860.11 t > 132.303 Hence ok
Lateral ties
according to the IS 456:2000 the diametre of the lateral ties shall not be less than
1) 1/4 th the diameterof the longitudinal bar
2) 6 mm
There fore provide 8 mm as the diameter of tie bar
pitch of lateral reinforcement should be least of the following
1) Least lateral dimension of compression member
2) sixteen times the smallest diameter of then longitudinal bar
3) 300 mm
Pitch of transverse ties
Least of the following
1) 130 cm
2) 40 cm
3) 30 cm
Pitch of ties = 30 cm
Distribution steel 8 mm @ 300 mm c/c
h= 5.0
0.25
b 0.70 a
III - 30
1.85 1.3
h
1.30
R
14.507
2.969
1.75 4.8
= 11.539 = x
4.8 3.05
x = 7.332
stress at the face of column = 10.300 t/m2 R = Radius of footing =
r= Radius of column =
Check for depth of footing
2 2
0.6 R 2
+r 2
+Rr = 0.6 2.4 +0.65 +2.4x 0.65
R+r 2.4 +0.65
III - 32
= 1.523 m 2 2
Area shaded = R - r 2 2
= 2.4 - 0.65 = 4.192 m2
4 4
Load on shaded area = 10.300 x 4.192 = 43.180 t
Maximum bending moment = 43.180 x 1.523 = 65.768 t-m
Breadth of shaded part at column face = x 1.3 = 1021 mm
4
Adopting C = 7 N/mm2 t = 190 N/mm2
and equating the moment of resistence to the maximum B.M =
10.11 bd2 = 10.11 x 1021.0 d2 = 65.77 x 1000x100
d= 25.241 cm < 60.00 cm
provide 20 mm dia bars with a clear cover of 60 mm
Effective cover to the centre of the upper layer = 60 +20 +10.00 =
Effective depth = 510 mm
Punching shear consideration =
Punching load = soil reaction on column area
2
= 10.300 x x ( 4.80 -
= 182.97 t 4
Safe punching shear stress = 12 kg/cm2
Equating the punching resistance to the punching load
x 130 x D x 12.00 = 182973.45
D = 37.335 cm
Steel required for the footing = 65.768 x 1000 x 100 = 76.090 cm2
1900 x 0.892 x51.00
There fore provide 24.00 bars of 20 mm dia in both ways
The reinforcement to the above extent should be provided in two principle direction and in a width equal to the sides of sq
inscribed in the plan of the footing. Length of the side of the inscribed in the plan of the footing. Length of the si
of the inscribed square
R 2= 2.40 2 = 3.3941 m
or 3394.0 mm
Check for one way shear
The critical section for one way shear is taken at a distance equal to the effective epth from the column face
The depth of footing at the edge = 0.30 m
300.00 = x x= 87.429
1750 510 1.3
= 1160.0 mm
Nominal shear stress at the critical sec tion 2 2
= 10.3004 ( 2.4 - 0.65 )
2 x 116.00 x 42.3
III - 33
= 0.0056 kg/cm2
III - 34
GN OF PIER FOR SLRB
III - 35
+ 72.975
5.00
1.3 0.45
(5x0.25+((5-1.30)/2)x0.45+1.3x0.45)x1.3x 2.5
III - 36
2.5
0.19
7.28 t
7.49
1.08 t
7.49
III - 37
Considered at the point of action of live load i.e centre of bearing
1000 x 1.490
III - 38
1000 x 1.490
kg/m run
kg/m2 is considered
1000
III - 39
m/sec
m/sec
V2 = 2 v 2 = 22.966
sin 200
454.894 kgs
1.197 t-m
1.470 t-m
(Case 2 )
cos 200
1249.8 kgs
III - 40
3.288 t-m
4.038 t-m
0.900 x 1.30
1.30
1.50 )x 1.30
1.50 )x 1.30
With 15 % Buoyancy
III - 41
Transverse
0.883
28.5285
1.716
31.128
25.834
15.501
158.137
146.604
Transverse
0.883
31.0365
III - 42
2.198
34.117
III - 43
B-4- 4.1 the direct and bending stresses calculated shall satisfy the
following conditions
III - 44
0.7267 m
III - 45
-1.00
1863.86 mm2
III - 46
As per clause 26.5.1.3
of IS 456 - 2000 Side face reinforcement is required
r
1.75
4.8
2.4 m
0.65 m
III - 47
4.8 m
90.00 mm
2
0.65 )
1750
510
0.30
0.30
4.8
III - 48
1160
1.30
III - 49
14. DESIGN OF SLOPED STREAM WING WALLS
W4 W5
W2 + 71.15
stressmax min
16.782 9.470
1 W1
stressmax min
5 16.805 10.788
W3
A + 67.050 SB
0.82 3.05 W4'
W3' 1.000
0.30 1.820 0.50 1.730 B 0.30 + 66.050
4.050
0.5
W6 C
4.65 + 65.550
III - 31
15.DESIGN OF WINGS & RETURN WALLS
W6 W1
w4' 4.820 stressesmax min
20.514 0.654
W2 0.764 67.05 SBL
A stressesmax min
w5 1.000 16.434 5.058
0.300 0.936 0.500 0.30 + 66.050
B 2.200
0.50
C W 7
2.800 + 65.550
III - 32
16.DESIGN OF CANAL WING AT STARTING & RETURN WALLS
W3
+ 73.04 FSL
W5 W1
stresses at Base
max min
W2 41.209 -5.100
1.850 stresses on soil
PV Pva max min
A 1.000 0.500 w5'' + 71.790 CBL 36.629 1.236
w4
w6' + 73.04 FSL
W1 stresses at Base
max min
69.829 -3.328
w6 W2 stresses on soil
PV max min
w4'' Pva 63.323 0.937
A 0.600 0.500 1.756 CBL + 71.790
w4'''
Ph W3 W4' 5.740 Pha
B
III - 33
0.30 2.856 1.0 0.3 66.050
3.86
0.5
C W5
4.456 + 65.550
III - 34
18.DESIGN OF CANAL WING AT STARTING & RETURN WALLS
W3
+ 73.04 FSL
W5 W1 stresses at Base
max min
45.721 -7.910
W2 stresses on soil
1.850 max min
pva 38.136 0.894
A 1.000 0.500 w5'' + 71.790 CBL
pv w5'''
ph W4 w5' +
5.740
pha
0.30 B 1.0 0.30 66.050
2.500
0.5
C W6
3.100 + 65.550
19.DESIGN OF CANAL WING AT END
stresses at Base
w4 w6' + 73.04 FSL max min
W1 38.524 -4.150
stresses on soil
max min
w6 W2 35.196 2.116
pva
A 0.600 0.500 1.756 CBL + 71.790
w4''
III - 34
W3 W4' w4''' 5.740
B pha
0.30 2.856 0.3 0.3 66.050
3.16
0.5
C W5
3.756 + 65.550
III - 35