University of the Philippines College of Law

Law 109 Criminal Law| Prof. Hornilla

Submitted by: David | Diaz | Javier | Reyes | Solitario
_____________________________________________________________________________

Topic Elements of criminal liability: Causation

Doctrine Proximate cause is that cause, which, in natural and continuous sequence,
unbroken by any efficient intervening cause, produces the injury, and
without which the result would not have occurred.

Case No. G.R. No. L-10126 October 22, 1957

Case SALUD VILLANUEVA VDA. DE BATACLAN and the minors NORMA,

Name LUZVIMINDA, ELENITA, OSCAR and ALFREDO BATACLAN, represented by
their Natural guardian, SALUD VILLANUEVA VDA. DE BATACLAN, plaintiffs-
appellants,
vs.
MARIANO MEDINA, defendant-appellant.

Ponente MONTEMAYOR, J.

FACTS

At around 2:00 AM, on September 13, 1952, Bus no. 30 operated by Mariano Medina
was running within the jurisdiction of Imus, Cavite when one of the front tires burst
and the vehicle began to zig-zag until it fell into a canal or ditch on the right side of the
road and turned turtle.

The three passengers seated beside the driver, named Bataclan, Lara, the Visayan and
the one woman behind them named Natalia Villanueva, could not get out of the
overturned bus.

Calls or shouts for help were made to the houses in the neighborhood. After half an
hour, came about ten men, one of them carrying a lighted torch made of bamboo with a
wick on one end, evidently fueled with petroleum. As these men approached the
overturned bus, a fierce fire started, burning the bus including the four passengers
trapped inside it.

It would appear that as the bus overturned, gasoline began to leak and escape from the
gasoline tank on the side of the chassis, spreading over and permeating the body of the
bus and the ground under and around it, and that the lighted torch brought by one of
the men who answered the call for help set it on fire.
 University of the Philippines College of Law
Law 109 Criminal Law| Prof. Hornilla
Submitted by: David | Diaz | Javier | Reyes | Solitario
_____________________________________________________________________________

ISSUES

Whether or not the proximate cause of the death of Bataclan was the fire which burned
the bus and its passengers.

DECISION

ISSUE RATIO DECIDENDI

Whether or not the NO
proximate cause of
the death of Bataclan The court disagreed. It held that the proximate cause of death was
was the fire which the overturning of the bus. A satisfactory definition of proximate
burned the bus and cause is found in Volume 38, pages 695-696 of American
its passengers. jurisprudence, cited by plaintiffs-appellants in their brief. It is as
follows:

. . . 'That cause, which, in natural and continuous sequence,

unbroken by any efficient intervening cause, produces the injury,
and without which the result would not have occurred.' And more
comprehensively, 'the proximate legal cause is that acting first and
producing the injury, either immediately or by setting other events
in motion, all constituting a natural and continuous chain of events,
each having a close causal connection with its immediate
predecessor, the final event in the chain immediately effecting the
injury as a natural and probable result of the cause which first
acted, under such circumstances that the person responsible for
the first event should, as an ordinary prudent and intelligent
person, have reasonable ground to expect at the moment of his act
or default that an injury to some person might probably result
therefrom.

The overturning of the bus set the other events in motion. The
leaking of the gasoline was not unnatural or unexpected. The
coming of the men with lighted torch, considering the fact that they
are living in a rural area where lanterns and flashlights were not
available, was a natural sequence of the overturning of the bus, the
trapping of some of its passengers and the call for outside help.

The burning of the bus can also in part be attributed to the

negligence of the carrier, through is driver and its conductor. They
should and must have known that in the position in which the
overturned bus was, gasoline could have leaked from the gasoline
 University of the Philippines College of Law
Law 109 Criminal Law| Prof. Hornilla
Submitted by: David | Diaz | Javier | Reyes | Solitario
_____________________________________________________________________________
tank yet neither the driver nor the conductor have cautioned or
taken steps to warn the rescuers not to bring the lighted torch too
near the bus. Said negligence on the part of the agents of the carrier
come under the codal provisions above-reproduced, particularly,
Articles 1733, 1759 and 1763.

RULING

The defendant carrier is liable for breach of contract of transportation for hire. The court
also agreed with the trial court that there was negligence on the part of the defendant,
through his agent, the driver Saylon.

The damages awarded by the trial court were increased from ONE THOUSAND (P1,000)
PESOS TO SIX THOUSAND (P6,000) PESOS, and from SIX HUNDRED PESOS TO EIGHT
HUNDRED (P800) PESOS, for the death of Bataclan and for the attorney's fees, respectively,
the decision appealed is from hereby affirmed, with costs.

CONCURRING / DISSENTING OPINION

Paras, C. J., Bengzon, Padilla, Reyes, A., Bautista Angelo, Labrador, Concepcion, Reyes, J. B. L.,
Endencia, and Felix, JJ., concur.

BRIEF DISCUSSION:

There are exemptions to the determination of whether an act is the approximate cause. A
felony committed is not the approximate cause when 1) there is an active force that
intervened between the felony and the resulting injury, and the active force is a distinct act
or fact absolutely foreign from the felonious act of the accused or 2) the resulting injury is
due to the intentional act of the victim. While we can definitely rule out the second
exception, the foregoing circumstances mentioned in the case adds complexity to the
analysis of the first exception. Is the burning of the bus an active force that is distinct or
absolutely foreign from the felonious act of the accused? The court thinks not, and the
group agrees with it. As established in the case, there is a rational connection between the
overturning of the bus and burning of the said vehicle. The overturning caused the gas
leakage, it prompted the passengers to call for help, it spurred the men to approach the
vehicle, bringing with them available sources of light so they may see in the darkness. The
overturning of the bus triggered a series of events, though unfortunate they may be, they
are connected nonetheless; thereby proving the first event to be the proximate cause.