Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Essay 2 Topic 3
Discuss the representation(s) of gender relations in two or three of the works we have
studied.
Judith Butler asserts that whether gender or sex is fixed or free is a function of a
discourse (9) an idea that is explored in the womens literature novels My Brilliant Career
by Miles Franklin (1901) and Sexing the Cherry by Jeanette Winterson (1989). Both novels
present gender (and thus identity) as fluid concepts which challenge the hegemonic discourse
themselves (intrapersonal) and their relationships with others (interpersonal). Within these
contexts characters perform both traditional masculinity and femininity and construct their
identity accordingly. In order to exemplify this notion of performative gender and fluidity,
this essay will complete character studies on the protagonists of each text: Sybylla (My
Brilliant Career), Dog-Woman (Sexing the Cherry), and Jordan (Sexing the Cherry). The
characters understanding of themselves, and the world around them will be explored and
The context in which My Brilliant Career was first published (1901) is of great
(Garton 347). Sybylla can be appreciated as an agent of this revolution based on her
performance of gender and identity. Butler describes gender as a part of an identity which is
created over time through the repetition of acts also known as a performance (140).
Sybyllas performance troubled earlier readers (and may continue to do so) as she refuses to
endorse any stable and unified model of identity, most crucially, with regard to her gender
(Henderson n.p). The novel is thus situated in a discourse of ambivalence, where Sybyllas
gender, her feelings about other characters (namely Harold Beecham), her desires and even
appearance are all questionable (Garton 346). This makes for Sybylla a difficult narrator to
trust at times. Sybylla notices that this ambivalence sets her apart in her society and that she
1
Zoie Magann (3161297) ENGL3013
is different to her female peers, saying they were not only in their world, they were of it; I
was not (Franklin 27). The world being described here can be assumed to be the world of
femininity and all it encompasses. This quote thus shows that Sybylla is aware that she exists
similar shade. Sybylla notes how Helen was left by her husband for another woman and as
such he turned her adrift, neither a wife, widow, nor maid (Franklin 35). The terms used
here (wife, widow, maid) are the three roles reserved for women of this time and are
designated based on the females relation to men. This means that like Sybylla, Helen exists
beyond the boundaries of heteronormativity as she occupies none of these roles. Interestingly,
contrary to Sybyllas self-ascribed unattractiveness (Franklin 26) she remains the subject of
male attention. Garton argues that the sustained interest of male characters in Sybylla
provides a basis for her rejection of them as suiters as she feels they cannot be worthy if they
find her appealing as a wife. These self-perceived short-comings as a woman allow Sybylla
to escape the expectation of marriage and thus free her from a discourse of heteronormativity
(339).
The ambivalence surrounding gender in the novel further manifests itself in the
fluidity of the genre of Sybyllas narrative and whether it is female romance, or male
realism. As Sybylla performs different gender constructs, the narrative weaves between the
two genres, constantly being interrupted by the other (Henderson n.p). The romance genre
prevails when Sybylla is happy and financially secure, and the realism genre is dominant
when she feels unhappy and constrained. Location is a key factor of this, and epitomizes the
significance of place in the novel. Sybylla feels immense happiness at Caddagat, Joy! Joy!"
(Franklin 90), a place which is described using romantic language (Franklin 29), and
conversely struggles at Possum Gully, Weariness! Weariness! (Franklin 18). This dual
2
Zoie Magann (3161297) ENGL3013
perspective reflects back to the binary structure that heteronormativity and gender occupies
(Butler 7), and further symbolises Sybyllas drifting between two states.
and role of women in society and the complexity of choosing between marriage and a career
was a common theme (Garton 337). This is apparent when it comes to Sybylla, who believes
marriage is an unfavourable option for women. Sybylla equates marriage to enslavement due
to the restrictive and unfair circumstances she believes it entraps women within and thus
decides such a construct is not for her and favours the pursuit of employment (Franklin 25,
50). This condemnation of marriage as the leading social role for colonial women is
indicative of the feminist thread that runs through the novel (Garton 338). For Sybylla, the
best relationship between a man and woman is one founded on companionship (Franklin 48;
Garton 341; Magarey 392), however she makes the observation that a man does not want his
wife to be a companion (Franklin 81). This is a point which relates back to issues of
equality. Sybyllas desire to be both in control and controlled in a relationship is one of the
most apparent examples of the aforementioned ambivalence in the novel and is cited as a
possible reason for her rejection of Harold Beecham (Magarey 397). However men are also
given somewhat caricature qualities to aid Sybyllas desire for a career over marriage (Garton
338). Magarey notes that Sybylla would not have been the only young woman of Franklins
era to rebel against heteronormativity as both marriage and birth rates in Australia plummeted
Sexing the Cherry is a perfect embodiment of the complexity of gender and the notion
that totality is impossible (Butler 16). Totality here meaning an individuals sole occupation
of one prescribed gender. This is particularly relevant when considering the tales of Dog-
Woman and Jordan, who move between and among gender and sexual identifications
(Jordan), or simply exceed them (Dog-Woman) (Lisa Moore in Lazar 176). Using these
3
Zoie Magann (3161297) ENGL3013
characters and others in the text, Winterson explores alternative genders and the manner in
which normative genders can be grafted (Kintzele 2) a notion which is symbolised through
the title of the novel. Further symbolism takes place in the fruit icons which head Dog-
Woman, Jordan and their modern counterparts text sections: a banana for Dog-Woman and a
pineapple for Jordan (Genca 23). The phallic nature of the banana and flowering, round
appearance of the pineapple provide sex associations to each passage of the text and their
narrators. This essay will now look to Dog-Woman and Jordan individually to examine how
Dog-Woman performs femininity through acts such as wearing a ribbon in her hair
(Winterson 19) and eating fruit in a ladylike fashion (Winterson 17). However she also
engages in violent acts which are typically considered masculine, such as the killing of her
Puritan enemies (Winterson 23, 96-97). In addition to this, Dog-Woman uses language and a
style of story-telling which would more commonly be associated with masculinity (Lazar
174), such as a fascination with morbid and gruesome details (Winterson 72, 92). In doing
this she dismantles a patriarchal discourse by vividly describing her dismembering of a male
character during an intimate encounter (Winterson 40). Dog-Womans physical size and
strengths disrupts gender discourses of females being perceived as weak (Genca 25; Lazar
175). It also prohibits heterosexual intimacy as males quite literally cannot measure up to her.
Dog-Woman and her nameless future counterpart are both threats to the patriarchy
established by dominant discourses the former due to her strength and size and the latter
due to her intellect and ambition (Genca 27). Female identity is made fluid through the
absence of naming female characters, almost stripping them of an identity other than what
they perform (Genca 25). This is contrasted against the male characters of the novel who are
all named, even minor characters such as Dog-Womans neighbours. While Dog-Woman
4
Zoie Magann (3161297) ENGL3013
exists beyond the boundaries of traditional femininity, she is still conservative in nature,
shown by her repulsion of Jordans sexed cherry and its ambiguous gender origin (Winterson
84-85).
Jordan is a postmodern agent in Sexing the Cherry who breaks down barriers between
the sexes, time, reality and lie (Lazar 177). This is made most obvious through his
presentation of a list of lies which address the uncertainty of the world (Winterson 89-90).
Such a postmodern perspective echoes Butlers assertion that genders can be neither true not
false, neither real nor apparent, neither original nor derived (141) a theme which seems to
take hold in Sexing the Cherry. Jordan and his future counterpart Nicholas both struggle with
the expectations society assigns males with and the masculinity that is demanded of them
(Genca 29-30). At one stage in the book, Jordan enters the world of women through
performance and dress. He lives amongst them and adapts to their ways of life. In doing so he
becomes aware of a feminine approach towards men and while shocked at first, finds it both
deserved and amusing (Lazar 175). Furthermore, Jordan is provided with a Womens rule
book which he is saddened to realise represents truth (Winterson 29-30). Despite Jordans
interaction with femininity he still pursues the seemingly innate colonial male dream of
conquering other spaces (Lazar 178). This desire is born when he first see a banana - which
fluidity of Jordans character enables Sexing the Cherry to challenge the hegemonic discourse
of heteronormativity. Another aspect of the novel which disrupts heteronormativity is the tale
of The Twelve Dancing Princesses (an adaption of the Brothers Grimm tale The Dancing
Shoes), which Jordan shares after meeting with the sisters directly. Kintzele argues that this
inclusion of the adapted classic fairy tale is Wintersons most effective exploration of gender
roles as the sisters challenge gender roles and what constitutes happily ever after (8-9;
Genca 31). Upon being forced into a marriage, each of the sisters escapes their husband
5
Zoie Magann (3161297) ENGL3013
through a variety of means, some including death. By promoting Jordans proximity to these
tales, Winterson asserts his position as a progressive agent of gender and identity and
denouncer of heteronormativity.
To conclude, the protagonists of My Brilliant Career and Sexing the Cherry challenge
roles. Sybylla, Dog-Woman and Jordan all show that gender is constructed and is thus able to
be deconstructed and reconstructed as required. Both Sybylla and Jordan are presented as
fluid agents of gender with an identity which is somewhat ambiguous, whereas Dog-Woman
remains quite conservative while still breaking through the boundaries of her sex and
prescribed gender. Despite the approach, all characters transcend and demolish traditional
gender roles an outcome which is arguably important when it comes to womens literature.
1833 words
6
Zoie Magann (3161297) ENGL3013
Works Cited
Butler, Judith. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Great Britain:
Franklin, Miles. My Brilliant Career. Australia: William Blackwood & Sons, 1901. EBook
Genca, Papatya Alkan. Fluid gender identities in Jeanette Wintersons Sexing the Cherry.
Henderson, Ian. Gender, genre, and Sybylla's performative identity in Miles Franklin's My
Brilliant Career. Australian Literary Studies 18.2 (Oct 1997): 165-173. Web.
Kintzele, Paul. Gender in Winterson's Sexing the Cherry. Comparative Literature and
Wintersons Sexing the Cherry. Studies of Science and Culture 10.3 (Sept 2014):
173-180. Web.
Magarey, Susan. My Brilliant Career and Feminism. Australian Literary Studies 20.4
Winterson, Jeanette. Sexing the Cherry. Great Britain: Bloomsbury Publishing Ltd, 1989.
EBook.