Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Approved
Accepted
August, 1985
I f ?^^ ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
11
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ii
I. INTRODUCTION 1
II. THE "MISE EN SCENE" 4
The Influence of Antonin Artaud .... 4
A Working Definition of the
"Mise en Scene" 6
III. DIRECTING AND ACTING ELEMENTS OF THE
"MISE EN SCENE" USED IN THE WEST
SIDE WALTZ 10
Directorial Choices in the
Production 10
Acting Choices in the Production . . . . 15
IV. PHYSICAL ELEMENTS OF THE "MISE EN SCENE"
IN THE WEST SIDE WALTZ 36
The Music in the Production 36
Scenery and Lighting Choices
in the Production 46
V. CONCLUSION 53
BIBLIOGRAPHY . 58
111
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
1
^Tr*w^!P^^^*'^^^\^-
Notes
11
were not discussed with the cast or technicians. Many of
these choices evolved out of the particular situation with
which the director was confronted.
A theatrical group which does not have its own space
in which to perform produced the play. Therefore, the
location dictated, to a certain extent, the director's
vision of the production. Because of the small size of the
production group, the director was in view of the audience
while he operated the lights and changed the set. This
caused no problem because, as stated earlier, one element
or aspect of the "mise" is that of involving the audience
in every portion of a production. To watch the director
run the lights and change the set, or to see the actors
preparing for an entrance, was certainly viewing the inner
workings of the production. The musicians, an integral
part of the "mise en scene," were in full view of the
audience at all times. The audience was placed on risers,
and the only access to the seating was across the stage
area. This put the audience in direct contact with the
world of the play and "exploded" the myth that a stage and
audience must be separated by an invisible barrier which
makes the audience feel safe and secure.
The West Side Waltz is not a play which demands that
an audience "run from the theater and protest against an
injustice." It is also not, on the other hand, a play
which can easily be brushed aside. It moves an audience to
Hip ^- ^ - ^ ^ m ^
12
some emotion. The director of the play, in staging various
situations, hoped to involve the audience in the charac-
ters' lives and situations while leaving an image or
picture in their minds. This picture was one which may
have been drawn directly from the play, or it might have
been an abstract image which an audience member perceived
while viewing the play.
15
filled the entire stage and moved very close to the audi-
ence. The spectators were drawn into the mood and atmo-
sphere of the moment. The final scene of the play began
with Margaret Mary's empty wheelchair placed close to the
rat room door. (The rat room had frequently been mentioned
as a place where no one wanted to enter because of the
possibility of encountering rodents.) When the audience
saw the wheelchair before the doorway, an immediate thought
moved through them concerning Margaret Mary's whereabouts
and welfare. The empty wheelchair created an image by
itself.
The director's choices of staging and movement, the
first aspect of the "mise en scene," showed the audience
the isolation, loneliness, and uncertainty of the charac-
ters of The West Side Waltz. Perhaps the audience saw
themselves as they observed the loneliness of Margaret Mary
or the isolation of Cara. Without a single word spoken,
the viewers could, by looking at such images as the violin
on the piano, the woman isolated from the other actors on
stage, or the empty wheelchair, discover the language of
the theater. This language was obviously directed to the
senses and found its basis in the "mise en scene."
22
herself into her neighbor's life. She was constantly
concerned with her cat, Ralphie, her building association
group, and, most important, her relationship with Margaret
Mary.
28
her pitch to modulate greatly throughout her dialogue.
When she first entered the scene, she seemed to be very
excited and nervous. Her pitch and intonation were
generally high and her rate was fast. At one point,
Margaret Mary remarked that she found it difficult to
understand what Robin was saying. She reminded Robin that,
if she intended to be an actress, she must enunciate.
Robin remarked, rather irritably, "This is something I m
cog-ni-zant of." 19
As Robin became more accustomed to Margaret Mary, and
vice versa, her speech patterns became less irritating.
Her vocal characteristics in later scenes with Cara and
Margaret Mary revealed to the audience a young woman who
had become more sure of herself. Whenever she became angry
and defensive, however, her volume and pitch rose, a normal
vocal change when anyone is angry. Robin's voice almost
became incoherent. Her accent seemed to take control when
she lost her temper.
In Robin's final scene, she used a variety of vocal
choices to create several images for the audience. Her
defense of Glen again showed the quality which her voice
assumed when angered. She screamed to Cara, "What's it to
20
ya? Mind your own beeswax, for Christ's sakel" In her
scene with Margaret Mary, her accent was almost completely
gone, her pitch and volume were controlled, and she showed
a calmness and maturity not previously seen in the
< }y...t^^r^j:i'Sis^^:iSS:i^=^-iSm
29
character. Her vocal choices caused a clear image to form
in the audience's mindthat of a young woman who had
undergone a process of maturation and change. The charac-
ter of Robin Bird, with her direct identification to many
members of the audience, provided one of Artaud's "valid
spectacles."
Although the characters of Serge and Glen were not as
prominent in the play as the three women, the actors had
choices available in portraying their characters. They had
to use the elements contained in the "mise en scene."
Serge Barrescu was a man who, through most of the play,
tended to be a congenial, gentle, and kind person. He felt
a closeness to Margaret Mary and Cara. Serge was not
overly-intelligent and a characteristic shrug suggested
this. This shrug also communicated another aspect of
Serge's character: that Serge pretended ignorance to keep
from working. Whether he confessed his failure as a
building maintenance man, watched Cara and Margaret Mary
play their instruments, or admired Robin's beauty. Serge
smiled. He walked with an unsure, small step which sup-
ported the possibility that Serge was in no hurry to get
anywhere, especially work. It was also quite possible
that, once he arrived at his destination, he was not sure
what to do.
The fact that Serge was unsure of the English language
caused him to drop his volume and to make his articulation
30
very precise. Very seldom was his vocal volume ever
raised. His obvious admiration of the women became clear
to the audience in his pitch and volume drop. Only one
time in the play did Serge change his usual vocal pattern.
This occurred when he became angry over being fired as
superintendent of the building. In anger and frustration.
Serge yelled at the women and then immediately dropped the
volume and pitch to his more typical, quiet manner.
Glen Dabrinsky also had a quiet manner but for another
reason. When Glen entered the scene, the audience already
had an image of him from the previous scenes. It had been
established that he and Robin had met on a bus, that he was
a lawyer, and that Robin was fond of him. He was nervous
on first entering the stage and tried to make a show of
meeting and greeting everyone. After Robin went to the
bathroom. Glen's nervousness became obvious. He stood
alone on the stage and shifted from foot to foot. When he
finally sat down, he joked with Cara and Serge and laughed
nervously. He seemed apologetic for the fact that Robin
had stranded him in the room with these strangers. When he
discussed his work as a lawyer, he seemed even to apologize
because he had not become more successful. He shrugged
when he talked about this and tried to escape by frequently
looking down the hallway for Robin.
During this time, Glen praised and flattered Margaret
Mary. He moved to her and asked her to play. He told her
V
31
that Robin had mentioned what a great pianist she was. As
he looked at the piano, he said, "Oh, wow, I don't believe
this piano . . . Robin tells me you're a real cracker jack
21
piano player." He continued this flattery to the point
of almost alienating the audience, and his constant use of
the word "charming" became very annoying. This word, in
fact, almost became an image itself to represent Glen
Dabrinsky. Although Glen himself was not charming, he
tried desperately to be just that.
and his pitch and volume both rose. He yelled, "Hey, Cara.
22
Give us a break, kid."
32
Later, as he finally defended himself against Cara's
constant belittling of Robin and himself, he shouted, "Heyl
Give me a break! I've gotta tell you: I don't like it
23
here!" At the height of his anger. Glen physically
defended and verbally protected Robin. This was an oppo-
site image from the one previously seen when Robin defended
Glen. He proved to the audience and those on stage that he
loved Robin by shielding her from possible attack. His
re-entry in Happy Harry's suit showed Glen as a man who had
become at ease with his current situation. He said, "I
look like I sell televisions, don't I?" Earlier in the
same scene. Glen was belittling himself but for a totally
different reason and with a totally different image sent to
the audience.
All five characters in The West Side Waltz made
choices in their portrayal of their various roles. In
Artaud's concept of the "mise en scene," an actor must
employ the vocal aspects of intonation and articulation and
the physical qualities of gesture, facial expression, and
movement. These elements are all used in various ways by
the actors to create a concrete image for the audience.
The rhythm that each actor achieved was reached through a
truth that each found within his or her individual perfor-
mance. Through this rhythm and truth, and the elements of
the "mise en scene," which each actor employed, the
33
audience received a direct communication from the stage in
the form of concrete images.
^
34
Notes
36
37
Music, one of the elements of the "mise en scene," is
important in any production, but in The West Side Waltz, it
is crucial. Of course, on the basic level, three charac-
ters play instruments. The play script comes complete with
the music which was used in the Broadway production. The
music ranges from fairly simple modern pieces to difficult
passages. The director had to make an early decision as to
which pieces to exclude and which to keep.
38
Flight of the Bumblebee" or "Die Schule der Gelaufigkeit,"
the actress on stage and the pianist in view of the audi-
ence both showed through their facial expression, gestures,
and movement at the piano their pleasure in their playing.
Both were obvious in their exasperation at Cara's errors in
playing. As Margaret Mary's playing deteriorated, the
pianist made mistakes and showed the audience, through
facial expressions in particular, the pain that the charac-
ter felt.
The violinist who played for Cara had a more difficult
task. Not hidden at all from the audience as the pianist
was, the violinist was in full view at all times. The play
began with violin music playing various selections. Some
were very difficult, which were not played well, and
others, simpler pieces, were played expertly. At one
point, during a particularly difficult movement, the
violinist dropped her bow, muttered to herself, and rushed
to finish the piece. Many in the audience thought that it
was an overture to the play, but when Cara entered, it
became quite evident that the violinist playing beside the
piano and the actress on stage were one and the same. As
Cara made frequent errors, both the actress and musician
facially expressed their chagrin; when the playing was
easy, that was also evident. Cara expressed frequent mood
changes directly dictated by the music, and those moods
were reflected by both performers.
39
The West Side Waltz is subtitled "A Play in 3/4 Time."
Ernest Thompson chose this because music is an integral
part in the play, as well as an integral part of the "mise
en scene." Each act began with several selections. Act I
was started with violin music alone, and Act II began with
piano, guitar, and violin in several numbers and concluded
with piano alone. The music obviously set the image in the
mind of the audience that this would be a major part of the
play. Many plays have some music beginning each act, and
some have music during scene changes. However, music in
this large amount signified something more important. The
title of the play was the first indication of the impor-
tance of music. The piano and violin both on stage and at
the side of the stage strengthened the image. After the
beginning of the first act, the audience quickly became
aware of the importance of music to the actors and the
entire production concept.
The first song that Margaret Mary and Cara played was
Strauss' "Du und Du." This translated to mean "The Two of
<. .y.-.-i*-^"^"-^'^
40
Us," and it was interesting that Margaret Mary played this
very well while Cara made frequent mistakes. This was only
one of many waltzes played throughout the production.
Waltzes set a natural rhythm3/4 time--for the production.
The rhythm was a flowing one which set an image in the
audience's mind. The scene ended with the two playing "Du
und Du" and continued into the beginning of the following
scene.
41
their minds. These two particular pieces, "The Flight of
the Bumblebee" and "Die Schule der Gelaufigkeit," as others
did throughout the play, upset the natural rhythm. Artaud
states that the theater should have "an idea of chaos, an
idea of the marvelous . . . and one or two concerning the
3
importance of speech." "The Flight of the Bumblebee" and
other numbers presented chaos to the audience. That
particular number definitely presented chaos to Cara. This
music supported the idea that speech or dialogue was
unnecessary. All that was needed was to see the faces and
gestures of the performers on stage to understand every-
thing that they were thinking and feeling at any given
moment. Music helped bring this knowledge to the audience.
Prior to the end of the third and final scene of Act
II, Robin, Cara, and Margaret Mary played a trio. It was
established earlier in the scene that Robin played the
guitar slightly. This scene followed the first argument
that Margaret Mary and Robin had. Robin threatened to
leave the apartment, but instead, she was coaxed into
playing a trio with Margaret Mary and Cara. The song that
they played was entitled "Playing Together is Fun," which
was actually "Twinkle, Twinkle, Little Star." The title,
"Playing Together is Fun," conjured up certain images in
the mind of the audience concerning the importance of music
in the lives of these people and the fact that music had,
once again, calmed the troubled waters between them. The
iksa^aaammx .v.. .-r.^
42
audience was left with the visual image of these three
women playing their instruments together in perfect
harmony. Margaret Mary played expertly, Cara picked up on
it quickly, and Robin tried the best that she could
representing their relationship on many levels. It was the
music as part of the "mise" that caused this image to form
for the audience.
return to happiness.
As the lights faded on this scene, the music ended.
This was the first scene change which had taken place in
silence. The audience was aware of the change, and this
change signified more of what Artaud would term "chaos."
Cara entered, and became frantic when she could not find
Margaret Mary. Once she was found, the audience could see
Margaret Mary's great physical deterioration. The scene
was one of resolving problems. Serge announced that he had
lost his job, and Cara had decided to run for vice-
president of her organization. Cara had purchased a
\^i9m^J'- \V'' "y^fcTJ^
^^'^
45
wedding present for Robin and Glen's approaching marriage.
All of the characters had made changes. Margaret Mary lay
on the couch and listened attentively to everything that
was going on around her. She watched, but did not become
physically involved. During this scene, there had been no
music played, and the audience was aware of this change
from the ordinary.
As the scene and play ended, Margaret Mary asked Cara
to play something for her. Cara, of course, suggested
something simple like "Gypsy Love Song." Margaret Mary
insisted upon Strauss or Chopin. Cara decided upon "One
More Waltz" because, as she stated, at least it was a
waltz. The title, which was heard by the audience, was a
return to a more normal situation. Margaret Mary's current
condition was not normal, but it was the situation that she
had to accept. She made another decision and invited Cara
to spend the night for the first time. The lyrics of "One
More Waltz" were also significant to the situation of these
two women. "One more waltz, here in my arms, close to my
5
heartOne more dream, for me to dream." The idea, of
course, was that there was always one more waltz to return
them to normalcy, and everyone had a dream left to dream.
An image was left in the mind of the audience as Margaret
Mary lay on the couch and listened, and as Cara, with her
violin in her hand, played, sang, and waltzed. It was not
necessary for any words to be spoken here in the final
' f '- .t-'...^
46
moment. This concrete image, strengthened by the "mise en
scene" element of music, was the final vision the spectator
would have.
Music played a large part throughout The West Side
Waltz. All of the characters commented on the importance
of music in their lives. It had brought the three women
together, changed the lives of two of them, and caused joy
or irritability between all five characters. Cara said
that she and Margaret Mary had their music to keep their
friendship together. Later, Margaret Mary told Glen that
music was "a great tonic. ..6 At the end of the play, when
things seemed to be at the darkest point, Margaret Mary
7
said to Cara, "At least we still have our music." The
audience was constantly aware of the music by seeing the
musicians play and react to the actors. Music was a major
factor in this play, and, as an element of the "mise en
scene," it became a vital force which brought about a more
powerful reaction in the spectator than words.
of the audience.
The set changes were also an important image in the
mind of the audience. All set changes were performed in
full view of the audience with the lights only slightly
dimmed. "Performed" was an appropriate word because they
i-^_ //.:^--.v:tvf*.x.T.-.j;ya!K;>.;sgaga
49
were a part of the production. Each scene change created
certain images for the viewer. In the early scenes of the
play, the scene changes were minor. They consisted of such
things as replacing music on the piano or removing glasses
and cups. Later, during the act break, the arm chair was
removed, and some of the green plants were taken away. The
season was winter when the second act began.
Another change occurred when Margaret Mary progressed
to the wheelchair. To allow her greater room to move, one
of the chairs was taken out. This was done for practical
reasons, but it also sent a message of change to the
audience. The major scene change occurred prior to the
final scene. Sitting in complete silence, the audience
watched Margaret Mary's home going through a transforma-
tion. The coffee table and rocker were removed. All green
plants were taken away. The couch was placed at a strange
angle which left a large empty space in the center of the
stage. As a final step, Margaret Mary's wheelchair was
placed in front of the open rat room door. This was done
because Margaret Mary had to move around the room in her
wheelchair. More important, however, these were made
because of the major changes in the lives of the charac-
ters. The season was winter, but, at this particular point
in the play, the audience was aware of a great change
simply because of this quiet, sombre method of changing the
scenery.
50
During this particular change, whispers were heard
from the audience. They realized that after the hostility
of the party scene, changes were inevitable. An image in
the audience's mind, as the lights brightened on this final
scene, was one of chaos and uncertainty. Artaud felt that
a production must contain both of these elements. The
scenery and set changes produced certain images for the
audience at this particular point as they had throughout
the production.
51
was still dim, and with the furniture changes, it looked
cold and unusual. As Cara entered, her first reaction was
to relight the lamps. This caused a little more warmth to
enter the scene. At the end of the play, the lights
remained bright and signified a hopeful change in the lives
of the characters.
Music, scenery, and lighting are all elements con-
tained within the "mise en scene." They comprise much of
what Artaud terms "the plastic part of a production." All
directors, when preparing and analyzing a production, must
consider the usage of these elements. If the director will
choose ways to use music, scenery, and lighting, other than
simply as decorative items, these elements and all other
elements of the "mise en scene" will produce concrete
images in the audience's mind.
52
Notes
Wr
CHAPTER V
CONCLUSION
53
54
elements.
58
nni
k^kk^kk^kk^kk^k. 1