HSL 862 - FALL 2017 (Midterm)

Strongly Disagree Strongly

Agree (4) Neutral (3) SCORE NA
Course Evaluation Questions Agree (5) (2) Disagree (1)

1 This course provided important information. 4 5 0 0 0 89% 0

2 This course included appropriate textbook (or other print material) readings. 2 4 2 1 0 76% 0
3 This course involved engaging lectures (or other experiential assignments). 3 5 1 0 0 84% 0
4 This course challenged me with appropriate tests (or other evaluation procedures). 4 4 0 0 1 82% 1
5 This course contributed meaningfully to my skills / knowledge /education in my field. 3 5 0 0 0 88% 0
6 Course strengths included. (See comments below)
7 Course weaknesses included. (See comments below)

Course strengths included:

1. Interesting material.
2. Extremely comprehensive review of neuioscience.
3. Very important.
4. Important and interesting information.

Course weaknesses included:

1. toomuch theory and conflicting definitions and ideas.
2. Time
3. It's just a long semester, long week, long everything, sorry
4. I really do not like reading quizzes before getting the chance to hear a lecture about the material. Make the reading quizzes about previous weeks material pretty please?

Instructor Evaluation Questions

8 This insturctor was well organized. 2 7 0 0 0 84% 0
9 This instructor created an engaging learning environment. 3 3 3 0 0 80% 0
10 This instructor motivated me to do my best. 5 4 0 0 0 91% 0
11 This instructor was fair in testing and grading. 5 3 0 1 1 80% 0
12 This instructor contributed meaningfully to my skills / knowledge / education in my field. 6 3 0 0 0 93% 0
13 Instuctor strengths included. (See comments below)
14 Instructor weaknesses included. (See comments below)
Instructor strengths included:
1. Very knowledgeable and cares about us and our thoughts.
2. Very knowledgeable. Very approachable, accommodating.
3. Knowledgeable and passionate.
4. Always wants to help us learn; very passionate.
5. Takes suggestions and tries to address them Thank You! Very passionate about the topic and very knowledgeable. It is interesting to learn your take and how you look more in dept at the whole
child this is so important!
6. Cares about students. Knows a lot re: these topics.
7. Very passionate or caring for us as student. Always willingto hear our points of view.

Instructor weaknesses included:

1. Structure of PPTs are hard to follow.
2. Too many slides, tests worth too much.
3. Lectures an be too dense / in-depth and information.
4. sometimes way to busy to full attend to student and class room needs.

Student Evaluation Questions

15 As a "learner", I came prepared to this class. 2 7 0 0 0 84% 0
16 As a "learner", I engaged attentively to the lectures. 1 8 0 0 0 82% 0
17 As a "learner", I gave my best to this course. 1 7 1 0 0 80% 0
18 As a "learner", I contributed meaningfully to my own knowledge / skills / education in my field. 1 8 0 0 0 82% 0
19 As a "learner", I expect to earn a(n) _____ in this course. (See grade letters below)
20 My strengths included. (See comments below)
21 My weaknesses included. (See comments below)

Grade Letters:
1. A
2. A
3. A
4. A
5. A to B
6. A
7. A
My strengths included:
1. Preparing for quizzes.
2. Motivated to learn.

My weaknesses included:
1. Not alotting time to review presentations.
2. sometimes have difficulty conceptualizing abstract process in CASP.