Ordinary Agenda 15 November 2017

AGENDA
Ordinary Meeting of Council
6.00pm Wednesday 15 November 2017
*** Broadcast live on Phoenix FM 106.7 ***
VENUE:
Reception Room,
Bendigo Town Hall,
Hargreaves Street, Bendigo
NEXT MEETING:
Wednesday13 December 2017
Bendigo Town Hall
Copies of the City of Greater Bendigo Councils Agendas & Minutes

can be obtained online at www.bendigo.vic.gov.au
PAGE 1
This Council Meeting is conducted in accordance with Local Law No. 8. It is an offence for any
person to engage in improper or disorderly conduct at the meeting.
Council Vision
Greater Bendigo - creating the wold's most liveable community.
Council Values
Six values inform everything we as Council do in working together to be the best we can
for all of our community.
Seeking to achieve the best value for our use of the communitys public funds and
resources, by:
We Lead;
We Learn;
We Contribute;
We Care;
We Respond;
We Respect.
Goals
Presentation and Managing Growth

Wellbeing and Fairness
Strengthening the Economy
Environmental Sustainability
Embracing our Culture and Heritage
Lead and Govern for All
PAGE 2
ORDINARY MEETING
WEDNESDAY 15 NOVEMBER 2017
ORDER OF BUSINESS:
ITEM PRECIS PAGE
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF COUNTRY 5
PRAYER 5
PRESENT 5
APOLOGIES 5
SUSPENSION OF STANDING ORDERS 5
PUBLIC QUESTION TIME 5
RESUMPTION OF STANDING ORDERS 6
CR EMOND'S REPORT 6
DECLARATIONS OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST 7
CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES 8
1. PETITIONS AND JOINT LETTERS 9
1.1 Response to Petition Parking Girton College and Sacred 9

Heart Cathedral Precincts
2. PRESENTATION AND MANAGING GROWTH 13
2.1 Planning Scheme Amendment C220 & Development Plan 13

DP/80/2016 - Lansell Crest, Consider Panel and Advisory
Committee Report, Adoption of Amendment C220, and
Approval of Development Plan DP/80/2016.
2.2 Planning Scheme Amendment C223 - White Hills and East 29

Bendigo Heritage Study, Stage 2 Consider Panel Report
and Adoption of Amendment
2.3 Planning Scheme Amendment C221 - Bendigo Urban 41

Flood Study - Consider Panel Report and Adoption of
Amendment
2.4 46-50 & 54-56 High Street, 65 Short Street and 80 Wattle 56
Street, Bendigo - Aspire Precinct
2.5 Bendigo Freight Study 80
3. WELLBEING AND FAIRNESS 95
PAGE 3
3.1 Bendigo Club Gaming Application 95
4. STRENGTHENING THE ECONOMY 100
5. ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY 100
6. EMBRACING OUR CULTURE AND HERITAGE 101
6.1 2018 Dudley House Community Hire Subsidy and 101

Performance Subsidy - Round 1 of 2
6.2 Funding and Management Agreement for Bendigo 105

Heritage Attractions
7. LEAD AND GOVERN FOR ALL 108
7.1 Council Meeting Dates 2017/2018 Mayoral Term 108
7.2 Council and Community Committees for 2017/2018 110
7.3 Appointment of Independent Member of the Audit 113

Committee
7.4 Record of Assemblies 115
7.5 Contracts Awarded Under Delegation 122
8. URGENT BUSINESS 124
9. NOTICES OF MOTION 124
10. COUNCILLORS' REPORTS 124
11. MAYOR'S REPORT 124
12. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S REPORT 124
13. CONFIDENTIAL (SECTION 89) REPORTS 124
13.1 Confidential Report in accordance with Section 89(2)(d) of 124

the Local Government Act relating to a contractual matter
____________________________
CRAIG NIEMANN
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PAGE 4
Ordinary Meeting - 15 November 2017
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF COUNTRY
PRAYER
PRESENT
APOLOGIES
SUSPENSION OF STANDING ORDERS
That Standing Orders be suspended to allow the conduct of Public Question Time.
PUBLIC QUESTION TIME
Public Question Time Purpose

Council has provided the opportunity for members of the public to ask questions of broad
interest to Council and the community. Matters relating to routine Council works should
be taken up with Councils Customer Service Officers through its Customer Request
System.
By the time planning matters have reached the council agenda, they have been through
an extensive process as required by the Planning and Environment Act. In addition, in
most instances mediation has been held between the parties involved. Throughout the
process there are many opportunities for the people to ask questions. Therefore, no
questions relating to planning matters on the Agenda will be accepted.
Public Question Time Where, When And Who

The public question time is held at every Ordinary Meeting of Greater Bendigo City
Council. Meetings of Council commence at 6.00pm in the Reception Room, Bendigo
Town Hall, Hargreaves Street, Bendigo.
The public question time is held at the start of the meeting as close as practical to
6:00pm. A maximum of 30 minutes has been provided for registered and unregistered
questions.
Residents are encouraged to lodge questions in advance so that a more complete

response can be provided.
Questions will be put to the Council by the individual posing the question; the question
will be answered by the Mayor or CEO, or where appropriate, Councillors or Council
Officers.
PAGE 5
Acceptance of Questions
Each person asking a question of Council is required to stand, state their name, and
address the Mayor. Public Question Time is not an opportunity for making of statements
or other comments. Councils Meeting Procedure Local Law does not allow for other
questions or comments during the remainder of the meeting.
1. An individual may only ask one question per meeting, a follow-up question may be
permitted at the discretion of the Mayor.
2. In the event that the same or similar question is raised by more than one person,
an answer may be given as a combined response.
3. In the event that time does not permit all questions registered to be answered,
questions will be answered in writing or referred to the next meeting if appropriate.
4. The Mayor and or CEO have the right to decline registration on basis of:
Legal proceedings;
More appropriately addressed by other means;
Vague or lacking in substance, irrelevant, frivolous, insulting offensive,
improper, defamatory or demeaning;
Answer likely to compromise his / her position;
Confidential, commercial-in-confidence.
5. Each individual whose registration form has been accepted or declined will be
advised by the Friday of the week prior to the scheduled meeting.
6. In the event of a registration form being declined the registration form will be
circulated to the Mayor or Councillors for information.
RESUMPTION OF STANDING ORDERS
That Standing Orders be resumed.
CR EMOND'S REPORT
PAGE 6
DECLARATIONS OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Pursuant to Sections 77, 78 and 79 of the Local Government Act 1989 (as
amended) direct and indirect conflict of interest must be declared prior to debate
on specific items within the agenda; or in writing to the Chief Executive Officer
before the meeting. Declaration of indirect interests must also include the
classification of the interest (in circumstances where a Councillor has made a
Declaration in writing, the classification of the interest must still be declared at the
meeting), i.e.
(a) direct financial interest

(b) indirect interest by close association
(c) indirect interest that is an indirect financial interest
(d) indirect interest because of conflicting duties
(e) indirect interest because of receipt of an applicable gift
(f) indirect interest as a consequence of becoming an interested party
(g) indirect interest as a result of impact on residential amenity
(h) conflicting personal interest
A Councillor who has declared a conflict of interest, must leave the meeting and
remain outside the room while the matter is being considered, or any vote is taken.
Councillors are also encouraged to declare circumstances where there may be a

perceived conflict of interest.
PAGE 7
CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES
Minutes of the Ordinary Meeting of Wednesday 18 October 2017.
The following items were considered at the Ordinary Council meeting held on
Wednesday 18 October 2017 at 6:00pm.
City of Greater Bendigo Annual Report 2016/2017

Response to Petition: Provision of More Off Street Parking at White Hills Shops
Response to Petition: Goynes Road, Epsom
9 Pratts Park Road, Strathdale - 15 Lot Subdivision, Construction of a Dwelling on
Each Lot and Removal of Native Vegetation
Plan Greater Bendigo
Draft Public Toilet Strategy
Naming of New Pool at Kangaroo Flat
Community Grants Round 1 2017/2018
Municipal Public Health and Wellbeing Plan
Audit Committee Chairperson's Report 2016/2017
Bendigo Stadium Limited Annual Report 2016/2017
Record of Assemblies
Contracts Awarded Under Delegation
Section 89 Confidential Reports (Contractual Matters)
The unconfirmed minutes have also been posted on the City of Greater Bendigo website
pending confirmation at this meeting.
RECOMMENDATION
That the Minutes of the Ordinary Meeting of Council held on Wednesday 18 October,
2017, as circulated, be taken as read and confirmed.
PAGE 8
Petitions and Joint Letters Ordinary Meeting - 15 November 2017
1. PETITIONS AND JOINT LETTERS
1.1 RESPONSE TO PETITION PARKING GIRTON COLLEGE AND

SACRED HEART CATHEDRAL PRECINCTS
Document Information
Author Caroline Grylls, Manager Safe & Healthy Environments
Responsible Vicky Mason, Director Health and Wellbeing

Director
Purpose
This report responds to the petition presented to Council on 20 September 2017 from
residents requesting Council urgently address access to on street parking for residents,
occupants or visitors. The petition focuses on street parking within the Girton College
and Sacred Heart Cathedral precincts.
Summary
A petition was received from residents within the precinct bound by Vine, Barnard, Short
and High Streets.
The petition draws to the attention of Council the deplorable situation regarding access
to on street parking for residents, occupants or visitors to addresses at numerous
locations within the City. This petition focuses on street parking within the 'Girton
College and Sacred Heart Cathedral precincts'.
The petitioners therefore request Council urgently address the availability of parking for
owners, occupants and visitors to properties within the described areas. Accordingly
petitioners respectfully requests Council as a matter of urgency take action to remedy the
situation and introduce as a minimum, 'Resident Permit Parking' as used by many
municipalities in Victoria. Council should also consider timed parking to further address
the issue".
The Citys current Residential Parking Policy allows residents to apply for a Residential
Parking Permit. The permits are available to occupiers of residential properties without
off street parking whose property is adjacent to a street that has time restrictions. The
permit will exempt a vehicle from a time restriction in a shared zone where fixed parking
periods apply but will not provide exclusive use of any particular parking space.
PAGE 9
The Safe and Healthy Environments department is currently undertaking a service

review of the Parking Services unit. As part of this process, the Residential Parking
Policy will be reviewed to ensure the policy meets the needs of the community, including
residents and businesses. The review will include consultation with key stakeholders and
bench marking with other Councils. The policy review will be undertaken within the 2017-
2018 year.
RECOMMENDATION
That Council:
1. Acknowledge that a review of the Residential Parking Policy will be undertaken

within the 2017-2018 year.
2. Notify the petitioners of the action taken and that further opportunity will be
provided for residents to provide comment during the Residential Parking Policy
review.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Policy Context
Community Plan Reference:
City of Greater Bendigo Community Plan 2017-2021
Goal 1: Lead and Govern for all
Objective 1.1 Engage with all communities
Goal 3: Strengthening the economy
Objective 3.1 Support our local businesses and industry to be strong, vibrant and to grow
and develop
Objective 3.3 Ensure Greater Bendigo is a welcoming place for new businesses and
industries and supports creativity and innovation and visitor attraction
Residential Parking Policy

Bendigo CBD Parking Strategy October 2008
PAGE 10
Background Information
The current Residential Parking Policy was adopted by Council in June 2009. The policy
allows residents to apply for a Residential Parking Permit. The permits are available to
occupiers of residential properties without off street parking and no reasonable
opportunity to modify the property to provide parking and their property is adjacent to a
street that has time restrictions. The permit will exempt a vehicle from a time restriction in
a shared zone where fixed parking periods have been created but will not provide
exclusive use of any particular parking space.
The provision of Resident Exclusive Parking Zones was considered by Council prior to
the new hospital construction in October 2013 and not supported.
Previous Council Decision(s) Date(s):
At the Ordinary Meeting of 23 October 2013 Council resolved to:
Not introduce Resident Exclusive Parking
At the Ordinary Meeting of 20 September 2017 Council resolved:
That the petition be received and a response be prepared within two (2) meetings
Report
A thorough and robust review of the current Residential Parking Policy will identify
Councils priorities and objectives to manage on street parking across the municipality.
The review will consider the needs of all stakeholders which include:
Businesses
Residents.
Residential visitors
Business customers
Business staff
Options/Alternatives:
Risk Analysis:
The petition requests Council as a matter of urgency take action to remedy the situation
and introduce as a minimum, 'Resident Permit Parking' as used by many municipalities
in Victoria. Council should also consider timed parking to further address the issue".
A total municipality review is required to ensure a balanced approach to on street

parking, allowing for a fair and equitable use of public land.
PAGE 11
Consultation/Communication
The community will be advised of the opportunity to provide comments and feedback
during the review process. Opportunities will be advertised through various mediums.
Resource Implications
Budget Allocation in the Current Financial Year:
Nil
Attachments
N/A
PAGE 12
Presentation and Managing Growth - Reports Ordinary Meeting - 15 November 2017
2. PRESENTATION AND MANAGING GROWTH
2.1 PLANNING SCHEME AMENDMENT C220 & DEVELOPMENT PLAN

DP/80/2016 - LANSELL CREST, CONSIDER PANEL AND ADVISORY
COMMITTEE REPORT, ADOPTION OF AMENDMENT C220, AND
APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT PLAN DP/80/2016.
Author Alison Kiefel, Planner
Responsible Bernie OSullivan, Director Strategy and Growth

Director
Summary/Purpose
Amendment details: The Amendment proposes to modify Schedule 16 to the

Development Plan Overlay which applies to 39-51 Lansell
Street, East Bendigo.
A summary of the changes includes:
Removal of cap on dwelling numbers;
Acknowledge issues of Certificate of Environmental
Audit;
Acknowledge work undertaken to record the heritage of
the site; and
Reformatting and separation of key issues.
Development Plan: The Development Plan proposes:
95 lots (104 dwellings) ranging in size from 85sqm to
350sqm;
2, 3, 4 & 5 bedroom dwellings that are double and triple
storey;
Two open space areas totalling 1,300sqm (5% of site);
Landscaped open spaces and nature strips;
All dwellings to have at least one car space, most will
have two;
One main link road accessible by Lansell or Lloyd Street.
Proponent: Blue Bondi Pty Ltd
No. of submissions: 103 (comprising 96 opposing, 7 supporting/neutral)
Key issues: The Amendment facilitates the development of the site in
line with the Citys strategic direction of urban
consolidation and development of key sites.
Density
Streetscape and neighbourhood character
PAGE 13
Traffic
Infrastructure services
The Panel and Advisory Committee (PAC) recommend that Council Adopt Amendment
C220 with minor changes, and approves the Development Plan DP/80/2016.
RECOMMENDATION
That the Greater Bendigo City Council resolves to:

1. Adopt Greater Bendigo Planning Scheme Amendment C220 with changes.
2. Forward the adopted Amendment to the Minister for Planning for Approval.
3. Approve the Development Plan DP/80/2016 following the Minister for Planning's
approval and Gazettal of Amendment C220.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Policy Context
City of Greater Bendigo Community Plan 2017 2021

Goal 2: Wellbeing and fairness
Create a much healthier Greater Bendigo
Create safe and resilient communities
Goal 4: Presentation and managing growth

Plan to meet future housing needs
Continue to implement strategies that increase the capacity of transport networks to
better move people and goods and encourages walking, cycling and the use of public
transport.
Keep Greater Bendigo attractive with good quality public facilities and places.
Goal 5: Environmental sustainability

Drawing on the One Planet Living* framework work to connect the health of the
natural environment to the health and prosperity of our community.
Goal 6: Embracing our culture and heritage

Recognise and celebrate our unique history and diverse cultures.
The key steps in the Amendment process are summarised below:
PAGE 14
The Amendment has arisen from a privately sponsored request by Blue Bondi P/L. The
site has a Development Plan Overlay which unusually restricts development of the site to
65 lots. This was suggested by the proponent when the site was originally rezoned in
Amendment C34 and suited the market environment in 2004.
Since then, the land has been included as a key development site in the Planning
Scheme as part of the Greater Bendigo Residential Strategy 2014, and Clause 21.05
Compact Greater Bendigo. This Amendment requests to alter the Development Plan
Overlay to complement this new strategic direction.
A request for approval of a Development Plan has also been received for the site. This
process is occurring concurrently with the Amendment. A Development Plan is prepared
for a site when required by a Development Plan Overlay. This Plan can be prepared at
any time, and has a separate statutory process to a Planning Scheme Amendment. A
Development Plan must be approved by the Responsible Authority (City of Greater
Bendigo) before a permit for subdivision or other development can be considered.
A planning permit will also be required for this development for subdivision and for
dwellings on lots less than 300sqm. The permit application will be assessed against an
approved Development Plan, referred to relevant authorities for conditions, but will be
exempt from any further public notice.
PAGE 15
Previous Council Decisions
8 June 2006 Amendment C34 gazetted which rezoned the land to Residential and
applied the Development Plan Overlay.
22 October 2014 Council adopted the Greater Bendigo Residential Strategy 2014.
2 March 2016 Council adopted Amendment C215, which changed the Municipal
Strategic Statement, including identification of this site as a key residential development
site.
29 June 2016 Council resolved to seek authorisation from the Minister for Planning for
Amendment C220.
17 May 2017 Council resolved to refer the Amendment (and Development Plan) to the
Minister for Planning to appoint an independent panel and advisory committee (PAC).
Report
The Explanatory Report details the purpose and effect of the Amendment and provides
the strategic justification for the Amendment.
Key issues identified in the Explanatory Report are discussed below.
Land affected by the Amendment
The subject site is located at 39-51 Lansell Street, East Bendigo, and known as Lot 2,
PS4348105.
The site is an irregular shaped allotment, approximately 2.6 hectares in size. The site
was formerly used as an abattoir, and later by the Country Roads Board. All buildings on
the site have been demolished and environmental decontamination works completed,
with a Statement of Audit issued.
The site is predominately cleared of vegetation, with undulating topography and four
trees remaining on the site. Access is via Lloyd Street which forms the northern
boundary or Lansell Street along the southern boundary. Lansell Street terminates at the
VicRoads office (Murphy Street end), and has a local only access road for residents.
Adjacent to the site to the east is the Bendigo VicRoads office and to the west is Bendigo
Kangan TAFE, East Bendigo public pool, and East Bendigo bowling green. Opposite the
site in Lloyd and Lansell Streets are established residential properties.
PAGE 16
What the Amendment does
The Amendment seeks to provide the ability for the land to be developed as a key
development site as part of the implementation of the Greater Bendigo Residential
Strategy 2014.
The Amendment proposes to amend Schedule 16 of Clause 43.04 Development Plan

Overlay to:
Delete the cap on dwelling numbers;
Update the schedule to acknowledge the previously issued Certificate of
Environmental Audits;
Update the Schedule to acknowledge work undertaken to record the heritage of the
site; and,
Update the format and requirements to be addressed in the Development Plan
Overlay.
What the Development Plan proposes
A Development Plan (including written report, layout plan, access plan, landscape plan,
staging plan, building envelope and details plan), has been prepared in accordance with
the proposed Development Plan Overlay Schedule 16.
In summary the Development Plan proposes:

95 lots (104 dwellings) ranging in size from 85sqm to 350sqm;
2, 3, 4 & 5 bedroom dwellings that are double and triple storey;
Two open space areas totalling 1,300sqm (5% of site);
Landscaped open spaces and nature strips;
PAGE 17
All dwellings to have at least one car space, most will have two;
One main link road accessible by Lansell or Lloyd Street.
Exhibition Procedures
The Amendment C220 and Development Plan DP/80/2016 were exhibited for one month
from 17 November 2016 to 19 December 2016.
Note The Planning Scheme does not require advertising of Development Plans,
however our municipality informally advertises Development Plans as part of its
transparent decision making processes.
Submissions
102 submissions were received, 87 during the exhibition period and 15 late submissions.
Of these, 7 were in support/neutral of the proposal, including all 6 referral authorities that
responded, and 95 submissions requested a change to the Amendment. Note that one of
the submissions from DELWP was inadvertently missed in the tally of submissions report
to Council at its May 2017 meeting. The submission was, however included as an
attachment to the Council report.
An additional submission was received following the Council meeting and was referred
on to the PAC, making 103 submissions in total and 96 referred to the PAC.
Of the 96 submissions requesting a change, over half (69) were the same wording
(preformatted), one was a petition of 101 signatures, and the remainder were from
individual residents and neighbouring property owners. It is noted that only 2 residents in
Lloyd Street raised issues, and one of these is located on the eastern side of Murphy
Street. Few of the objecting submissions were residents of Lansell Street.
The key issues raised by the submitters included:

Removal of cap for number of lots;
Key development site and density intensification;
Neighbourhood character;
Amenity and social impacts;
Traffic and road network;
Parking;
Public open space, size of backyards;
Infrastructure.
All submitters will be notified of Councils decision resulting from this report.
The PAC Hearing
The Minister for Planning appointed an Independent Panel to consider the Amendment
and a joint Advisory Committee (PAC) to consider the Development Plan.
PAGE 18
A preliminary hearing was held on 3 July 2017 in Bendigo, in which the PAC issued a
number of directions for the City and the Proponent to assist with their assessment of the
proposals.
The Panel Hearing was held on 5, 6 and 7 September 2017 in Bendigo. The PAC
considered all written and oral submissions and material presented to it in connection
with the Amendment:
The City was represented by City staff;

The proponent was represented by Mr Cicero from Best Hooper Lawyers and called
three (3) expert witnesses in the fields of Planning, Traffic and Infrastructure; and
Five (5) submitters chose to make verbal presentations to the PAC.
The Panel and Advisory Committee Report and Recommendations
The PAC Report was received on 4 October 2017. Under Section 26 of the Planning &
Environment Act 1987, the Panel Report was automatically released to the public on 1
November 2017, 28 days following its receipt.
In summary, the PAC supported the Amendment as exhibited with minor changes to the
wording and layout of the Development Plan Overlay Schedule 16, and no changes to
the submitted Development Plan DP/80/2016.
The PACs recommendation stated:

"Based on the reasons set out in this Report, the Panel and Advisory Committee
recommends that Greater Bendigo Planning Scheme Amendment C220 be adopted
subject to the following:
Include the Development Plan Overlay Schedule 16 included at Appendix D of the
Panel and Advisory Committees report.
Review whether the reference to the Heritage Assessment, Former City of
Bendigo Abattoir, Anthemion Consultancies, revised August 2014 needs to be
retained.
Based on the reasons set out in this Report, the Panel and Advisory Committee
recommends that Development Plan DP/80/2016 be approved as exhibited."
The changes recommended to the DPO16 by the PAC are:
Move the four reports undertaken for the site, being the two Environmental Audits;
Site Environmental Management Plan and Heritage Assessment report from Clause
1.0 Requirements before a permit is granted to Clause 2.0 Conditions and
requirements for permits.
PAGE 19
Insert in Clause 3.0 Requirements for development plan Urban Design two dot
points:
The general layout of the proposed development showing how it can provide a
variety of lot sizes, dwelling types and orientations and social inclusion.
How the plan has been designed to enable the requirements of Clause 55 to be
satisfied, and how lots within the plan have been designed to reasonably enable
future dwellings to satisfy the requirements of Clauses 54 and 56 of the planning
scheme.
Delete in Clause 3.0 Requirements for development plan Urban Design one dot
point:
How the development provides for housing diversity and social inclusion.
There were no other recommendations or changes suggested by the PAC. This is

unusual and a solid outcome, which demonstrates the City had properly and
comprehensively considered the issues in line with current planning policy.
It is recommended that the PAC recommendations be adopted in full as per the

Development Plan Overlay Schedule 16 supplied by the Panel and attached to this
report.
Below are conclusions of the PAC in response to key issues raised by submitters.
State and Local policy compliance

The Amendment and Development Plan will facilitate higher density residential
development consistent with the designation of the site in the GBPS [Greater Bendigo
Planning Scheme] and the GBRS [Greater Bendigo Residential Strategy] as a key
development site and in accordance with their 10 minute neighbourhood principles. The
proposed development will also help to address the mismatch between household
structure and the types of dwelling being built in Bendigo.
The PAC is satisfied that the Amendment and Development Plan are generally
supported by and are consistent with the State and local policies and strategies relating
to residential development and development of this site.
Removal of cap on dwellings

"The PAC concludes that prescribing a limit on the number of dwellings in the DPO 16
would be inconsistent with the residential policy framework that applies to the site and is
unnecessary in light of the extensive planning scheme provisions that are adequate to
manage development of the site."
Site contamination
"The PAC concludes that updating the reference to site contamination and remediation
approvals in the DPO16 is appropriate."
This conclusion is referenced in the recommendation.
PAGE 20
Heritage
"The PAC concludes that Council should review whether the reference to the revised
Heritage Assessment serves any purpose and should be retained in the DPO16."
Notification
"The PAC concludes that the notification arrangements under the DPO16 are
appropriate."
Neighbourhood character, urban design and amenity; Built form

"The PAC concludes:
The proposed development will make a positive contribution to the character of the
surrounding urban environment and facilitate a well-designed, contemporary
residential development,
The overall design and key elements of the Development Plan are consistent with the
relevant State and local policies and are an appropriate response to the
characteristics and features of the site and general area.
Detailed design issues will be further refined and addressed as part of the planning
permit processes."
The General Residential Zone (garden area)

"The PAC concludes:
The Development Plan is generally consistent with the garden area provisions of the
GRZ.
Council and the Proponent should liaise with DELWP to determine how and at what
stage the GRZ garden area provisions might apply to future planning permit
applications for the site."
Access and movement; Traffic generation and assessment methodology; Impact on

surrounding road network; Development Plan road network assessment; Parking
"The PAC concludes:
The methodology underpinning the traffic engineering assessment is sound.
The existing road network can safely and efficiently accommodate the traffic that will
be generated by the development.
The traffic and parking arrangements are generally satisfactory.
Visibility and sight distance issues within the site should be reviewed as part of the
detailed road design."
Infrastructure and servicing

"The PAC concludes:
The proposed development is capable of being serviced, including drainage, water
and sewerage infrastructure.
There are no infrastructure capacity or service issues that limit or preclude
development of the site consistent with the Development Plan."
PAGE 21
Open space and landscaping

"The PAC concludes:
The size, structure and location of the two parks are appropriate.
Further detailed planning and design of the two parks should be carried out in a
creative and collaborative process.
The landscape plan provides a satisfactory response to the requirements of the
revised DPO16."
All of the conclusions above are supported with minor changes to the Amendment as
proposed by the PAC and no changes to the Development Plan.
Assessment of Development Plan against the Planning Scheme requirements
A Development Plan has been prepared and advertised concurrently in accordance with
the proposed amended Development Plan Overlay Schedule 16, (and is attached to this
report) consisting of:
A written report
Development Plan
Accessibility Plan
Activation Plan
Indicative Building Heights Plan
Indicative Landscape Plan
Staging Plan
The below table discusses the requirements of the Development Plan Overlay (as
amended by Panel recommendation) in relation to the submitted Development Plan.
The development plan must comply with Statement of Environment Audit issued on 8
December 2005; Certificate of Environmental Audit issued on 20 Jan 2016, Site
Environmental Management Plan, Residential Development, former VicRoads Depot,
29 Jan 2016; and The Heritage Assessment, revised August 2014.
The Development Plan is considered to comply with these documents.
Urban Design
The general layout of the proposed development showing how it can provide a
variety of lot sizes, dwelling types and orientations and social inclusion.
The development will achieve a density of 38 lots per hectare, or 95 lots and 104
dwellings. Lot sizes will vary between 85sqm 350sqm, with one lot over
700sqm. This will allow for medium density residential development and compact
housing.
The following lot sizes are proposed:
12 lots, 13% of lots (85-100sqm)
17 lots, 18% of lots (101-150sqm)
25 lots, 26% of lots (151-200sqm)
40 lots, 42% of lots (201-350sqm)
1 lot, 1% of lots (700sqm +)
Two (2) of the lots are proposed to be multi dwelling sites.
PAGE 22
The dwelling sizes are proposed as:

25 (24%) - 2 bedroom dwellings
44 (42%) - 3 bedroom terrace houses
28 (27%) - 4 bedroom town houses
7 (7%) - 5 bedroom town houses
The development proposes a compact style of housing that is significantly
underrepresented in the Bendigo property supply. The range of housing types
and sizes will create more diversity in housing stock, for a variety of
demographics.
The site is in close proximity to infrastructure services for efficient supply, and is
easily accessible via foot, bicycle or public transport to nearby community
facilities.
How the plan has been designed to enable the requirements of Clause 55 to be
satisfied, and how lots within the plan have been designed to reasonably enable
future dwellings to satisfy the requirements of Clauses 54 and 56 of the Planning
Scheme.
In summary, the development meets the majority of the standards and all the
objectives in Clause 56 of the Planning Scheme. (Refer to the attachments for
the full Clause 56 assessment).
There are no matters which would prevent compliance with Clause 54 or 55
which is assessed in detail as part of a later planning permit.
The site will provide a liveable and sustainable community as it is within walking
distance to two bus stops and a supermarket; provides good walking connections
through the development, and is close to the Bendigo CBD.
The site is not covered by a specific neighbourhood character policy but has
addressed neighbourhood character through the design of dwellings on the edges
and landscaping.
It will provide a mix of housing types and is of an acceptable lot density for the
Zone.
Half of the lots have good solar orientation and almost all proposed dwellings
have been designed to have living areas facing in a northerly direction.
The design of the street network is appropriate and meets the Infrastructure
Design Manual in most cases. It is recommended that one of the access places
and the access lane parallel to Lloyd Street be common property.
All services can be provided to the development.
The provision of dwellings on lots that abut the existing road reservations of Lloyd
and Lansell Streets designed and configured with active frontages and individual
pedestrian access.
Included in the Development Plan is a detailed plan indicating the proposed
layout, lot sizes with building envelopes and driveways. This layout has utilised
the existing slope of the land, with a central crest to minimise earthworks. The
proposal includes 95 lots, with a central access street providing access from both
Lansell and Lloyd Streets. Lots orientated to the existing street network have rear
vehicle access to maintain an active frontage and landscaping.
The dwellings have been orientated to allow significant views over the proposed
park land, and to the city skyline.
Measures taken to minimise any possible conflict with abutting non-residential uses.
PAGE 23
The proposed Development Plan shows lots backing onto the adjacent VicRoads
and TAFE sites with a fence between the sites. The rear yards of the lots will
include setbacks to the buildings of approximately 6m, which is considered
sufficient to provide further landscaping and screening to improve the interface.
Built Form
Indicative height and scale of any proposed development.
An indicative building heights plan shows the lots and proposed scale and heights
with all perimeter lots having buildings of 2 storeys, and two blocks of 3 storeys
located adjacent to the two internal Parks. These heights are within the scope of
the General Residential Zone, and make use of the existing topography to
provide views across the City skyline. The amenity impact to neighbouring
properties is also minimised by the maximum 2 storey development around the
perimeter of the site.
Access and movement
A comprehensive transport analysis, which identifies expected traffic volumes
associated with the proposed use, including trip generations.
Included in support of the Development Plan is a Traffic Engineering Assessment
report prepared by Traffix (October 2016) which concluded:
Traffic generation from the proposed development will be similar to that predicted
for the current Overlay of a 65 lot density, of approximately 640 to 650 trips per
day.
The Traffix report concluded that the existing road network around the
development is capable of accommodating the extra traffic. Lloyd and Lansell
Streets will remain well within the capacity specified in the Planning Scheme, as
will the intersections of Murphy and Lloyd Streets, and Lansell and Charleston
Streets, based on SIDRA data provided.
Expert evidence from Ratio (August 2017) was presented to the PAC that essentially
supported the Traffix conclusions regarding traffic generation and capability of the
existing road network. Particularly that:
The traffic generation will be below 8vpd per dwelling.
Lansell and Lloyd Streets (and beyond streets) are capable of the additional
traffic based on the evidence provided without any upgrade required.
That no intersection alterations or improvements are necessary as a direct result
of this development, however a splitter island at Patrick Street to assist with
pedestrian movements has been identified as a desirable addition in response to
a submission.
That no additional traffic survey is necessary for when the neighbouring Pool and
Bowls Club are in use.
That additional surveys were undertaken, and
That the surveys included a wider road network that reflects the more likely
distribution of traffic.
The proposed movement network which:
Provides convenient internal and external access/linkages;
Allows for the safe and efficient operation of emergency vehicles; and
Provides attractive, convenient, safe and legible pedestrian and bicycle networks
within the site.
PAGE 24
The Development Plan includes an Accessibility Plan, which shows the

anticipated road network required for the development. This includes an:
Access Street (14.6m reserve width), the main street through development.
Access Place (7m reserve width), one way street around Hilltop Park.
Access Places (10.8m reserve width), providing rear access to lots fronting
Lansell Street with a turning area.
Access Laneway (7m reserve width), a street north of Arbor Park and
providing access to lots fronting Lloyd Street and to the west. This includes
part undercover laneway.
New footpath along the frontage of site in Lansell and Lloyd Streets with
additional landscaping.
All allotments and dwellings will have good access to the road and pedestrian
pathway networks.
An accessibility plan shows the road, cycle and pedestrian routes with specific
waste bin pad areas within the proposed development and existing
neighbourhood. The landscape plan shows the proposed streetscape treatments.
That service and emergency vehicle access is sufficiently provided for via the
main Access Street. (This has been supported by the CFA.)
The Planning department has considered the Traffix report and expert evidence
by Ratio, and notes the following:
That some of the access places/lanes do not meet the requirements of the
Planning Scheme or the Citys IDM and therefore will need to be common
property. This includes the Access Lane in the north west and rear access
to lots fronting Lloyd Street as proposed by Ratio; and the dead end
Access Place providing rear access to lots fronting Lansell Street. The
Access Lane is because this street contains overhanging balconies, and
does not meet the IDM requirements. The Access Place, as noted in the
Traffix report, does not meet the turning circle requirements for emergency
vehicles. This will not affect accessibility by emergency or service vehicles,
as a bin pad is provided on the proposed main Access Street and the
street is not more than 60m long. This was noted in the Traffix and Ratio
reports.
That another bin pad will be required in the north west of the development
near Arbour Park as the road will be common property.
The Development Plan should be amended to show the proposed Patrick
Street splitter island.
In summary, the proposed street network and street infrastructure proposal is
generally supported, subject to a satisfactory, detailed engineering design as part
of a future planning permit application.
The location of car and bicycle parking within the public realm.
The Accessibility Plan submitted with the Development Plan shows 46 on-street
car parking spaces, located along the proposed main Access Street (27 spaces),
and along the frontage of the site in existing streets - Lansell Street (9) and Lloyd
Street (10).
The proposed car parking provision meets the requirements of Clause 52.06;
sufficient parking is being provided in the development (27 provided, 21 required
by the Planning Scheme).
PAGE 25
The proposed and existing road network is proposed to cater for cyclists on-
street, with a further detailed landscape plan to show the bicycle parking.
Open space and landscaping
Public open space should be designed and located to best meet the needs of
residents within the new development and those in adjoining and existing houses.
The Development Plan includes a landscape plan and activation plan, which
illustrate the park locations and public space landscape treatments.
The amount of public open space in the Development Plan meets the Greater
Bendigo Planning Scheme requirement for 5% of the total site. A landscape plan
has been submitted which shows two open space parks, and streetscape
treatments.
The site is also in proximity to other public open spaces including: the small
playspace in front of the East Bendigo Swimming Pool (150m from site); a bush
reserve and informal walking tracks (150m); and Lake Weeroona, which is a
regional playspace, and parkland (1km).
Dwellings adjoining the open space should be designed to front onto and have active
frontages overlooking the open space so as to enhance surveillance of the area.
All allotments have been carefully designed to have easy access to, or overlook
one of the two green spaces within the development.
All lots that abut the existing Lloyd and Lansell Streets have rear vehicle access
from the new street network and pedestrian access via footpaths along the
existing frontages.
Appropriate landscape theme(s) for nature strips and public open space areas, using
native, indigenous and exotic plants.
A landscape plan showing themes and plantings consistent with the Citys tree
planting guidelines has been submitted. Reuse of heritage timber beams from
former buildings on site and interpretive signage is included. The Citys
Landscape and Public Open Space Unit is satisfied with the proposal.
Any vegetation which is to be retained and protected
N/A The development plan application does not include the retention of the four
(4) trees on site.
Servicing
Provision of water, drainage, electricity, sewerage, data cable conduit, gas and the
common trenching of compatible services.
The Development Plan includes a servicing report prepared by Terraco, which
states all available services can be connected to the site.
Coliban Water and NCCMA have no objection to the proposed Development Plan
and agree the site can be adequately serviced.
Staging
The staging and density of the development.
A proposed staging plan has been submitted, indicating 15 stages of
PAGE 26
development, with the first stages fronting Lansell Street and working across the
site in a northerly direction to Lloyd Street.
The PAC stated the following in response to the Terms of Reference for the Advisory
Committee:
"The PAC is satisfied that the Development Plan will provide an acceptable development
outcome and should be approved. The proposed density of development is consistent
with the residential development policies for Bendigo and the site, and will make
appropriate use of a designated Key Development Site in proximity to the Bendigo City
Centre. The proposed development will make a positive contribution to the character of
the surrounding urban environment by facilitating a well-designed, contemporary
development on a vacant site.
The PAC is satisfied that the traffic engineering assessment and methodology that
underpin the Development Plan are sound. The existing road network can support the
proposed development, although a splitter island should be provided at the Patrick Street
and Lansell Street intersection to enhance safety. The mix of on-site and off-site parking
is adequate to service the development. The internal road network will provide adequate
emergency and garbage vehicle access.
The PAC is satisfied that drainage, water, sewerage and other necessary infrastructure
are available and have sufficient capacity to service the proposed development."
Conclusion
It is recommended that Council adopt Amendment C220 in its revised form as

recommended by the PAC, and forward the adopted Amendment to the Minister for
Planning to approve. This will complete the Amendment process and the new
Development Plan Overlay Schedule 16 (DPO16) will be changed once gazetted.
It is also recommended that Council approve the Development Plan DP/80/2016 with
minor additions for another bin pad area in the north west of the development and a
splitter-island at Patrick Street. The PAC did not recommend any changes. Approval can
only be granted once (if) the new DPO16 has been gazetted. Conditions are not able to
be imposed on this approval.
These two processes will acknowledge the Councils in-principle agreement to the
proposed development and complete the Amendment and Development Plan process.
A planning permit application is required to be submitted, assessed and issued before

development could begin. The approval of the Development Plan does not automatically
mean approval of the development, as the application will need to demonstrate
compliance with the relevant Zone and other planning provisions. The permit application
will, however not be subject to public notice as per Development Plan Overlay
requirements.
Options
In regard to the Amendment C220; Council has the option of
PAGE 27
Adopting the Amendment without making the recommended changes by the PAC
(supported by a planning reason) and sending to the Minister for Planning for
Approval.
Adopting the Amendment in accordance with the PACs recommendations and
sending to the Minister for Planning for Approval. (This is the preferred option).
Abandoning the Amendment under the Planning and Environment Act 1987. There is
no right of review of a council's decision not to support an Amendment.
In regard to the Development Plan DP/80/2017; Council has the option of

Approving the Development Plan without changes.
Approving the Development Plan following requested changes. (This is the preferred
option)
Requesting other changes or further information.
Officer time will be required to prepare the Amendment documentation for adoption and
liaise with the Minister for Planning. There is no change in resources for future planning
permits as a planning permit was also required under the existing overlay provisions.
The proponent has agreed to pay for the statutory fees and extra costs incurred by the
City for holding the PAC, as per the policy for private Planning Scheme Amendments
adopted by Council.
Attachments
Explanatory report.
PAC report.
Expert evidence reports (3 reports)
Additional Submission
Development Plan including written report and 6 plans
Clause 56 assessment table.
PAGE 28
2.2 PLANNING SCHEME AMENDMENT C223 - WHITE HILLS AND EAST

BENDIGO HERITAGE STUDY, STAGE 2 CONSIDER PANEL REPORT
AND ADOPTION OF AMENDMENT
Author Morgan James, Planner Amendments

Director
Summary/Purpose
Amendment details: The Amendment proposes to implement the White Hills and
East Bendigo Heritage Study Stage 2, 2016 by:
Applying the Heritage Overlay to:
o Five new heritage precincts;
o Two existing heritage precinct extensions;
o Sixteen places of individual heritage significance;
o Three miners cottages.
Including the Study as a reference document.
Applying the amended Greater Bendigo Heritage
Incorporated Plan - Planning permit exemptions to the
affected properties to remove permit requirements for
minor works. The Planning Panel supported the
Amendment with minor changes.
No. of submissions: 17 (6 unresolved)
Key issues: Implementing the Citys strategic heritage vision and
work program;
Determining heritage significance;
Defining a heritage precinct;
Integrity of heritage places;
Accuracy of heritage citations;
Impact on development potential.
RECOMMENDATION

1. Accept the Panels recommendations;
2. Adopt Greater Bendigo Planning Scheme Amendment C223 with changes; and
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
PAGE 29
Policy Context

6.1 Celebrate our unique heritage
PAGE 30
The Greater Bendigo Thematic Environmental History, 2013 identified East Bendigo
and the White Hills corridor as the highest priority areas requiring a heritage study. The
City subsequently commenced the White Hills and East Bendigo Heritage Study in
2013-14.
Due to an expansion of the study area to include the Hospital precinct and a greater
than expected number of individual places being initially identified, the study was split
into two stages. Stage 1 contained heritage places identified in the Hospital precinct
area and 5 large industrial type sites and was approved by the Minister for Planning in
May 2016.
Stage 2 (current stage) of the White Hills and East Bendigo Heritage Study was
undertaken by heritage consultants Context Pty Ltd during 2015-2016 and considered
places of potential cultural heritage significance using historical research, community
consultation and site surveys.
20 August 2014 Council resolved to adopt the White Hills and East Bendigo
Heritage Study Stage 1, 2014 and request the Minister for Planning to authorise
Amendment C201 to the Greater Bendigo Planning Scheme, and when authorised,
exhibit the Amendment.
4 March 2015 Council resolved to adopt the recommendations for each submission
and request the Minister for Planning appoint an Independent Panel to consider all
outstanding submissions.
26 August 2015 Council resolved to adopt Amendment C201 to the Greater Bendigo
Planning Scheme and request approval from the Minister for Planning.
20 July 2016 Council resolved to adopt the White Hills and East Bendigo Heritage
Study - Stage 2, 2016 and request the Minister for Planning to authorise Amendment
C223 to the Greater Bendigo Planning Scheme, and when authorised, exhibit the
Amendment.
17 May 2017 Council resolved to accept the late submission, adopt the
recommendations for each submission and to request the Minister for Planning to
appoint an Independent Panel to consider submissions.
Report
The Explanatory Report details the purpose and effect of the Amendment and its
strategic justification. Key issues identified in the Explanatory Report are discussed
below.
The Amendment affects approximately 467 properties in the suburbs of White Hills,
Bendigo, Ascot and Epsom (the Explanatory Report has the full address list).
PAGE 31
Almost 300 of these properties are considered to be non-contributory places within a

heritage precinct and will be subject to additional planning permit exemptions, as distinct
to those places identified as contributory or of individual heritage significance.
The Amendment proposes to implement the White Hills and East Bendigo Heritage
Study Stage 2, 2016 by:
Applying the Heritage Overlay to:
o Five new heritage precincts (Bridge Street North, Buller Street, Gleeson Street,
Norfolk Street, White Hills and Hamlet precincts)
o Extension of two existing heritage precincts, Baxter Street and Tomlins Street
precincts
o Sixteen places of individual heritage significance
o Three miners cottages that will be added to the existing miners cottages serial
heritage listing in the planning scheme
Including the Study as a reference document at Clause 21.10
Applying the amended Greater Bendigo Heritage Incorporated Plan - Planning permit
exemptions to the affected properties to remove permit requirements for minor works
*See Figure 1 for more detail
PAGE 32
Figure 1: White Hills and East Bendigo Stage 2 areas
PAGE 33
Exhibition
The Amendment was publically exhibited for one month from 17 November 2016 to 19
December 2016.
Submissions
17 submissions were received to the Amendment with 5 supporting or seeking minor

changes and 12 opposing.
Following the close of exhibition, Officers discussed submissions with all submitters and
attempted to address any outstanding concerns. At the Council meeting of 17 May 2017
Council resolved to refer 11 unresolved submissions to the Panel.
The key issues raised by the submitters included:

The effect of inclusion in the Heritage Overlay on property values;
The Citys methodology in applying the Heritage Overlay;
Permit exemptions;
Site specific issues.
The Panel Hearing
The Minister for Planning appointed an Independent Panel to consider the Amendment.
The Hearing was held on 21 and 22 August 2017. The Panel considered all written and
oral submissions and material presented to it in connection with the Amendment.
The Panel Report and Recommendations
The Panel Report was received on 19 September and contained 9 recommendations.

The Panel Report was released to the public on 17 October 2017 under Section 26 of the
Planning & Environment Act 1987, as 28 days had elapsed since the report was
received.
In summary, the Panel supported the Amendment as exhibited and concluded:

Council has undertaken a thorough process to assess the heritage significance and
apply the heritage overlay to places identified in the Study.
The Study, subject to post-exhibition changes, be included as a Reference
Document.
The Amendment is strategically justified.
The Panel concluded that:

The Amendment is supported by, and implements, the relevant sections of the State
and Local Planning Policy Framework, and is consistent with the relevant Ministerial
Directions and Practice Notes. The Amendment is well founded and strategically
justified, and the Amendment should proceed... p.11
In regards to the methodology, the Panel concluded that:
PAGE 34
Heritage Studies are complex pieces of work and require a thorough methodology and a
great deal of time and dedication to succeed. The Panel concludes the Amendment is
founded on long-standing methodology and has been applied judiciously and with
rigour. p.14
The following table lists the Panels recommendations and provides a brief comment in
response.
Table 1 : Panel recommendations
Rec. Officer Response and

Panel Recommendation
No. Recommendation
Amend the Greater Bendigo Heritage This was at the request of the
1.
Incorporated Plan Permit Exemptions to City to accommodate changes
include the list of individual places made to address submissions.
identified within the White Hills and East
Accept the Panels
Bendigo Heritage Study 2016 as listed in
recommendation.
Document 11 (Appendix 8 of Councils
Part B submission).
Delete the term and hamlet from the This was at the request of the
2.
White Hills Heritage Precinct and all City to remove an unnecessary
citations and references contained within addition to a precinct name.
the Heritage Study, Schedule to the Accept the Panels
Heritage Overlay and Greater Bendigo recommendation.
Heritage Incorporated Plan-Permit
Exemptions.
Amend the White Hills and East Bendigo This was at the request of the
3.
Heritage Study, Stage 2 (2016) as listed in City to accommodate changes
Document 11 (Appendix 8 of Councils made to address submissions.
Part B submission) and include as a Accept the Panels
Reference Document. recommendation.
Adopt the post-exhibition changes listed in This was at the request of the
4.
Table 2 of the Panel report. City to accommodate changes
made to address submissions.
Accept the Panels
recommendation.
Amend Map 19 to include 91 Lucan Street, This was at the request of the
5.
North Bendigo (HO902). City to accommodate a
correction to mapping.
Accept the Panels
recommendation.
PAGE 35
Rec. Officer Response and

Panel Recommendation
No. Recommendation
Revise the Heritage Overlay by extending This is discussed further below.

6.
the curtilage of 14 Heinz Street, White Hills Accept the Panels
(HO908) in line with the north- eastern recommendation.
boundary of Lot 11 and remove the horse
stalls from the mapping.
Amend the citation for 14 Heinz Street, This was at the request of the
7.
White Hills (HO908) to make it clear that City to accommodate changes
the house and stables are elements of made to address submissions.
primary significance and the stalls and Accept the Panels
utility building are not of significance. recommendation.
Revise the Norfolk Street Heritage Precinct This was at the request of the
8.
Plan by deleting 20 Norfolk Street, North City to accommodate changes
Bendigo and the self-seeded tree from 21 made to address submissions.
Norfolk Street. Accept the Panels
recommendation.
Amend the Bridge Street North Precinct by This is discussed further below.
9.
listing 62 Bridge Street, Bendigo as non- Accept the Panels
contributory. recommendation.
Council should investigate the application This is discussed further below.
of a Heritage Precinct north of Nolan Accept the Panels
Street, Bendigo as part of any future recommendation.
Heritage Amendment.
14 Heinz Street, East Bendigo
The Panel recommended that the area of the heritage overlay at 14 Heinz Street be
amended as per the below images (area in yellow) and the horse stalls be removed from
the Heritage Overlay.
PAGE 36
Figure 2: 14 Heinz Street approved subdivision plan and proposed heritage overlay
extent
Following receipt of the submission for 14 Heinz Street, officers had extensive
discussions with the submitter, particularly in regards to defining what the significant
elements were and the appropriate areas to be included in the Heritage Overlay.
In an attempt to resolve the submission prior to the Panel hearing, officers put forward to
the submitter a revised Heritage Overlay which recommended the removal of the horse
stalls, which were in poor condition, whilst allowing greater curtilage for the important
stables building. This proposal is outlined in the images above.
This proposal was not accepted by the submitter and the matter was subsequently heard
at the Panel Hearing where officers outlined the history of the site, negotiations and the
offer put forward to the submitter.
Officers submitted to the hearing that the horse stalls are contributory and sought the
Panels direction on this and on the appropriateness of curtilage given to the three
significant buildings on site.
The Panel noted that Councils willingness to concede the stalls reinforced the view of
the Panel that the horse stalls could be removed. The Panel was satisfied that with the
removal of the stalls, the site still meets its Statement of Significance.
PAGE 37
The Panel further concluded that heritage precincts need to have integrity and be clearly
legible by the community. The Panel found that the approved 14 lot subdivision greatly
reduces the significance of one of the heritage elements, that being the horse stalls. With
this significant amount of infill proposed, it finds that the stalls could be removed, on the
condition that greater curtilage be given to the larger stables structure. This was
consistent with Councils initial approach to the submitter.
Officers accept the Panels conclusions and although the loss of the rear stalls is
unfortunate, we agree the greater curtilage given to the stables is a positive outcome,
which will ensure that the significant elements of the site can be appropriately retained
and understood.
Officers will now work with the submitter to explain the recommended changes to the
extent of the Heritage Overlay and work through the implications for the subdivision of
the site, which could be accommodated via an amendment to the planning permit, as the
affected area has not been subdivided yet.
62 Bridge Street, North Bendigo
Following receipt of the submission for this site, officers put forward an offer to the
submitter in an attempt to resolve their concerns. This offer was that the Heritage
Overlay should remain as proposed but that 62 Bridge Street could be changed to be of
non-contributory heritage significance. This would in effect allow demolition of the
building and further open the development potential for the properties on the corner
whilst ensuring it could be done in a way that appropriately manages the heritage values
of the area.
This approach was pursued in an attempt to achieve a balanced outcome for both
Council and the submitter and be of net community benefit.
This offer was also proposed in an attempt to resolve the submission and avoid the
Planning Panel hearing cost of upwards of $10,000 a day, plus fee for our expert witness
to contest the submission at a Panel Hearing.
It was also made clear to the submitter at the time that we considered the property at 62
Bridge Street to be contributory and that if the offer was not accepted and a Panel would
have to be held, the offer would be void and we would go to the Panel defending that the
property was contributory.
Following the hearing the Panel stated that Councils own willingness to concede the
status of the property reinforces the view of the Panel that, combined with other factors,
the property could be removed as contributory.
The Panel found that the property has a commercial use, which diminishes its
contribution, and it is quite isolated from similar stock in its location. The Panel found
that this intersection introduces a commercial area, not a residential one.
The Panel concluded that the Bridge Street North Precinct should be amended by listing
62 Bridge Street, Bendigo as non-contributory.
PAGE 38
Whilst it is unfortunate that the dwelling at 62 Bridge Street has not been considered to
be contributory, officers consider this to be an acceptable outcome as the Heritage
Overlay will still apply to the property and allow the impact of any future development on
the heritage precinct to be considered.
Recommendation for further work north of Nolan Street
At the Panel hearing, the heritage expert representing the Bridge Street submitters
stated that in his opinion the section of Bridge Street north of Nolan Street to Lucan
Street should have also been included in the Bridge Street North Precinct due to the
number of potentially contributory buildings on the west side of the street.
Officers responded that the area had not been recommended for inclusion in the
Heritage Overlay as part of this heritage study, but we would be open to the Panels
recommendation for further work.
On inspection, the Panel agreed with the heritage expert and recommended that Council
should look to the precinct north of Nolan Street in any further heritage study.
This recommendation is accepted and the City will seek to examine the area in detail in a
future heritage study.
Conclusion
It is recommended that Council adopt the Amendment with the changes recommended
by the Panel and forward the adopted Amendment to the Minister for Planning to
approve. This will complete the Amendment process and the Heritage Overlays can
apply. All affected property owners will then be notified of the Minister's decision.
Options
Council has the option of:

Adopting the Amendment in accordance with the above Panel and Officer
Recommendations and sending to the Minister for Planning for Approval, OR
Adopting the Amendment in part, OR
Abandoning the Amendment under the Planning and Environment Act 1987 - There is
no right of review of a council's decision not to support the Amendment.
The Amendment will increase the number of properties included within the Heritage
Overlay and this will result in an increase in the number of planning permit applications.
However, the Amendment also proposes to introduce the Permit Exemptions
Incorporated Plan to these places, which will limit the number of planning permit
applications under the Overlay.
Officer time will be required to prepare the Amendment documentation for approval and
to liaise with the Minister for Planning.
PAGE 39
The City is responsible for payment of statutory fees and costs incurred in the
processing of the Amendment, which includes:
An estimated fee of $10,000 for the Planning Panel hearing
An estimated fee of $11,000 for our Expert Witness (authors of the heritage study) at
the Panel hearing
A fee of $453 for the Minister for Planning to consider the request to approve the
amendment.
This cost has been included in the 2017/2018 budget.
Attachments
Explanatory Report.
Panel Report.
PAGE 40
2.3 PLANNING SCHEME AMENDMENT C221 - BENDIGO URBAN

FLOOD STUDY - CONSIDER PANEL REPORT AND ADOPTION OF
AMENDMENT
Author Emma Bryant, Coordinator Amendments and Heritage

Director
Summary/Purpose
Amendment details: The amendment proposes to implement the outcomes of the

Bendigo Urban Flood Study 2013, which was commissioned
by the North Central Catchment Management Authority and
the City. The Study is one of the largest and most
comprehensive urban flood studies ever undertaken in
Victoria and its implementation will provide a consistent set
of flooding planning controls across the Bendigo urban area
for the first time.
The amendment will apply flooding controls to a number of

properties to ensure that flooding is considered in
development proposals. It also removes the Environmental
Significance Overlay from some urban creeks, reduces
planning permit requirements when certain conditions are
met and introduces guidelines for development within flood
prone areas to assist permit applicants.
Proponent: City of Greater Bendigo and North Central Catchment
Management Authority
No. of submissions: 53 (49 requesting a change, 4 in full support, 5 late but still
considered)
Key issues: Providing more accurate and comprehensive flood
information in the Planning Scheme.
Planning to minimise risk to the community from flooding.
Accuracy of flood mapping.
Removal of the Environmental Significance Overlay.
Effect on insurance and valuations.
PAGE 41
RECOMMENDATION

1. Accept the Panels recommendations.
2. Adopt Greater Bendigo Planning Scheme Amendment C221 with changes.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Policy Context
City of Greater Bendigo Community Plan 2017 2021.

4.1 Plan for a growing population.
PAGE 42
For many years the Land Subject to Overland Flooding overlays in Bendigos Planning
Scheme have been recognised as being out of date and inaccurate. In 2009, after
extensive lobbying by the City and North Central Catchment Management Authority
(NCCMA), the State Government and the Federal Government (via the then Natural
Disaster Mitigation Program) committed funds to undertake a new flood study, for the
purpose of updating these overlays in the Planning Scheme. This Study, the Bendigo
Urban Flood Study (BUFS) was completed in 2013.
Bendigo is made up of a complex series of catchments that feed water into Bendigo
Creek, Myers Creek and Axe Creek and ultimately north towards the Murray River. To
fully understand this complexity, the consultant, Water Technology, integrated two
models to map overall flooding. The Rainfall and Runoff Model, otherwise known as the
Spine model, was used to model the main creeks, and the Rainfall on Grid model was
used to model the many individual small catchments across the city using real ground
surface levels and approximately 20,000 underground stormwater pipes.
The resulting raw data was very detailed ranging from a small puddle in a back yard to a
fast flowing creek; with approximately 50,000 properties affected. The consultants
believe that the study is the largest of its type ever undertaken in Victoria and possibly
Australia (1 computer ran the models for more than 12 months). The NCCMA and the
City then applied filters to this information, eg removing all flooding less than 50mm,
removing puddles less than 800m2, to come up with the ultimate mainstream flooding
along the creeks and waterways and stormwater flooding.
The Spine model was calibrated using data from existing stream gauges, observations
and photos obtained from the community and technical knowledge from the NCCMA and
the City. The mapping from this model formed the basis of a revised Land Subject to
Inundation Overlay (LSIO) in the Scheme. There are two proposed schedules for this
Overlay; LSIO1 (flooding depth less than or equal to 350mm), and LSIO2 (flooding depth
greater than 350mm). A LSIO3 schedule has also been used in the amendment to
replace the existing LSIO outside the new study area; the data there is unchanged so
this modification is administrative only.
The mapping from the Rainfall on Grid model was used as the basis for the newly
introduced Special Building Overlay (SBO). There are also two proposed schedules for
this Overlay; SBO1 (identifies areas where flooding from the storm water system comes
from a catchment greater than 60ha and cannot be readily rectified) and SBO2 (identifies
land currently protected by the Epsom Huntly levee bank which has not been properly
constructed according to State requirements, and where the land is very flat and has
local drainage problems).
The NCCMA and the Citys Presentation and Assets Directorate undertook extensive
consultation with the community in 2013 to refine the mapping. Nearly 10,000 properties
that may be impacted were directly contacted to seek feedback.
Communications included:
Media briefing, media releases and public notices
Individual letters to properties owners affected by the proposed Planning Scheme
Overlays (9,216).
PAGE 43
Twelve public workshops to allow individual residents, businesses, and landowners to

discuss the flood study at prearranged times.
More than 600 individual meetings
Radio and television
Website (more than 2,500 hits)
Social media
The result of this consultation was finalisation of the Bendigo Urban Flood Study 2013
(BUFS).
The proposed amendment also proposes changes to the Environmental Significance

Overlay Schedule 1 (Waterway Protection) that is currently used as a type of de facto
flooding overlay in some parts of Bendigo. The amendment proposes to remove this
overlay from minor waterways in urban Bendigo that do not have environmental values;
ie constructed channels and minor waterways not designated under the Water Act 1989.
In preparing this planning scheme amendment, the City and the NCCMA put significant
effort into researching other planning schemes, streamlining the planning scheme tools
and reducing permit requirements. This has resulted in changes to the LSIO schedule
and preparation of a Local Floodplain Development Plan, which will provide specific
guidance to planning permit applicants and assessors.
23 October 2013 Council endorsed the community consultation phase for the study.
18 December 2015 Council adopted the Flood Study and requested the Minister for
Planning to authorise Council to prepare and exhibit the amendment for six weeks.
10 August 2016 Council decided to accept all late submissions, adopt the report
recommendations for each submission and request the Minister for Planning to appoint
an independent panel with members who have experience in flood management and to
hold the panel in Bendigo.
Report
The attached Explanatory Report details the purpose and effect of the Amendment and
provides the strategic justification for the Amendment. Key issues identified in the
Explanatory Report are discussed below.
The Amendment will affect approximately 5,500 properties in total across the urban
Bendigo by either adding or removing an overlay. Some properties will be affected by
more than one map change. The map below shows the land to be affected by a new
flooding control.
PAGE 44
Map 1: Proposed Planning Scheme Overlays
The Amendment proposes to:
PAGE 45
Rezone land at 16 Rosemundy Road, Epsom, from Urban Floodway Zone to Farming
Zone.
Delete the Environmental Significance Overlay (Schedule 1) from approximately
1,200 properties that are located within 100 metres of waterways that are constructed
channels or non-designated waterways.
Delete the Land Subject to Inundation Overlay from all land in the study area,
approximately 2,000 properties.
Apply the Land Subject to Inundation Overlay Schedule 1 to approximately 4,031
properties that are potentially subject to flooding up to 350mm depth in the 1 per cent
Annual Exceedance Probability (AEP) or 1 in 100 flood event.
Apply the Land Subject to Inundation Overlay Schedule 2 to approximately 1,583
properties that are potentially subject to flooding greater than 350mm depth in the 1
per cent AEP flood event.
Replace the Land Subject to Inundation Overlay with Land Subject to Inundation
Overlay Schedule 3 in the rural areas outside urban Bendigo.
Apply the Special Building Overlay Schedule 1 to approximately 392 properties
throughout the Bendigo urban area.
Apply the Special Building Overlay Schedule 2 to approximately 327 properties
protected by the Bendigo Creek earthen levee.
Amend Clauses 21.02, and 21.08 of the Municipal Strategic Statement to refer to the
importance of flood management and planning.
Amend Clause 21.10 of the Municipal Strategic Statement to include the Bendigo
Urban Flood Study 2013 as a reference document in the Planning Scheme.
Amend the Schedule to Clause 44.04 (Land Subject to Inundation Overlay) and insert
new Schedules 1, 2 and 3 to identify different types of flooding and permit
exemptions.
Insert Clause 44.05 (Special Building Overlay) to identify land that is liable to
inundation from overlay flows from the urban drainage system and insert Schedules 1
and 2 to the Special Building Overlay to identify particular types of overland flow and
include a local floodplain development plan in Schedule 2.
Amend the Schedule to Clause 61.03 to update the list of maps in the Planning
Scheme.
Amend the Schedule to Clause 81.01 to include the Bendigo Local Floodplain
Development Plan (March 2016) as an incorporated document in the Planning
Scheme.
Exhibition Procedures
The Amendment was exhibited for six weeks from 19 May 2016 to 30 June 2016.
Notice was provided in the following manner:

Individual notices to owners and occupiers of land affected by the Amendment.
Notices to prescribed Ministers under Section 19(1)(c) of the Planning and
Environment Act.
PAGE 46
Notices to all authorities materially affected under Section 19(1)(a) of the Act.
Public notice of the Amendment in the Bendigo Advertiser on 18 May 2016 and 21
May 2016.
Publication of the notice of the Amendment in the Government Gazette on 19 May
2016.
Access online at City of Greater Bendigo web page, Bendigo Urban Flood Study.
Three public information sessions, advertised in all of the above notices and on-line
and attended by approximately 200 people.
Community information bulletin.
Submissions
Fifty-three submissions were received to the amendment including five as late

submissions received after the exhibition period. One of these was received after the
previous Council meeting that considered the submissions and was sent directly to the
Panel for consideration.
Of the submissions, six were from public authorities and the remaining submissions from
landholders or companies representing landholders. Fortynine of these submissions
requested a change. Six of these were fully resolved prior to the Panel hearing and a
further 8 during the hearing. (Refer to attached summary table of submissions and
responses). All submitters were contacted individually by the City prior to the Panel
hearing explaining whether their submission could be accommodated or not.
The key issues raised by the submitters overall included:
Overlay mapping accuracy. This was the most common issue raised. A few
submissions were supported by documented technical evidence but most were not.
The NCCMA and the City reviewed all these submissions, including site visits, and
supported changes where they could be technically justified.
Approved development. A number of submissions were received from developers

requesting that the overlay not be applied to land where planning permits for
development have been granted or pre-application planning support given. These
submissions were supported where development such as filling has occurred or is
about to occur, but not where permits had not been granted or where they had
expired.
Removal of the Environmental Significance Overlay Schedule 1. Some submissions

requested removal of the ESO1 on the grounds that their land had no environmental
values. None of these submissions were supported by NCCMA and the City as they
didnt meet the criteria for removal. It is acknowledged, however, that a review of the
whole ESO1 in the future would be valuable.
Insurance and valuations. A few submissions were concerned that the flood mapping
would affect insurance and valuations. The mapping and amendment is to identify
land that is liable to flooding so that development can be appropriately planned into
the future to reduce risks. Often insurance premiums fall once flood studies are
completed because risk of the unknown has been reduced. High premiums are often
because the insurer is uncertain of what the flooding risk will be and whether the land
can be safely developed.
PAGE 47
All submitters will be notified of Councils decision resulting from this report.
The Panel Hearing
The Minister for Planning appointed an Independent Panel to consider the Amendment
and submissions received. The Hearing was held on 18-20 October 2016. The Panel
has considered all written and oral submissions and material presented to it in
connection with the Amendment.
The Panel Report and Recommendations
The Panel Report was received on 21 November 2016 and contained 9

recommendations. Under Section 26 of the Planning & Environment Act 1987, the Panel
Report was automatically released on Monday, 19 December to the public, 28 days
following its receipt.
In summary, the Panel supported the Amendment as exhibited with minor changes and
concluded:
Amendment C221 is strategically justified and supports State policy for floodplain
management by identifying areas liable to flood risk hazard based on a 1 in 100 year
probability.
The flood modelling undertaken to support Amendment C221 was based on accurate
ground levels and data, calibration and modelling and is appropriate to inform the
application of the Land Subject to Inundation Overlay and Special Building Overlay.
The form and content of the proposed changes to local policy, overlay schedules and
the incorporated document Bendigo Local Floodplain Development Plan are generally
consistent with relevant Ministerial Guidelines and Planning Practice Notes, and are
appropriate for managing development that warrants assessment with respect to
effects on and from flood processes and environmental values and hazards
associated with flood processes.
The structure of the overlay schedules and the Bendigo Local Floodplain
Development Plan are appropriate and offer a useful guide to the controls for
practitioners and decision makers.
The post exhibition changes to the mapping of the overlays in response to
submissions are supported.
The following table lists the Panel's recommendations and provides a brief comment on
how the recommendation should be applied.
The Panel recommends that Greater Bendigo Planning Scheme Amendment C221 be
adopted as exhibited subject to the following:
PAGE 48
Rec.
Panel Recommendation Officer Recommendation
No.
1 Amend Schedules 1, 2 and 3 of the Accept the Panels
Land Subject to Inundation Overlay recommendation.
and Schedule 2 of the Special Building
Overlay to include the following This recommendation ensures that
additional permit requirement: where new subdivisions have been
built up to above the floodplain, that
Buildings and works on land subject to individual houses in the estate wont
an existing planning permit, restriction require a planning permit under the
or agreement: LSIO.
if land has been developed in
accordance with a planning permit,
restriction or Section 173
agreement requiring its ground
surface level to be finished at least
300mm above the 100 year ARI
(average recurrence interval) flood
level; and
survey plans confirm that the
ground surface level has been
constructed in accordance with the
requirements of a planning permit,
restriction or subdivision; and
any buildings and works do not
lower the ground surface level or
result in a finished floor level for a
dwelling that is below 300mm
above the 100 year ARI flood level.
2 Amend Schedule 1 of the Special Accept the Panels
Building Overlay Clause 1.0 Permit recommendation.
requirements to replace the words No
exemptions specified with the This recommendation ensures that
following: where new subdivisions have been
built up to above the floodplain, that
A permit is not required to construct a individual houses in the estate wont
building or construct or carry out works require a planning permit under the
as follows: SBO1.
Buildings and works on land subject to

an existing planning permit, restriction
or agreement
if land has been developed in
accordance with a planning permit,
restriction or Section 173
agreement requiring its ground
surface level to be finished at least
300mm above the 100 year ARI
PAGE 49
Rec.
No.
flood level; and
survey plans confirm that the
ground surface level has been
constructed in accordance with the
requirements of a planning permit,
restriction or subdivision; and
any buildings and works do not
lower the ground surface level or
result in a finished floor level for a
dwelling that is below 300mm
above the 100 year ARI flood level.
3 Review the flood mapping and Accept the Panels
application of the Land Subject to recommendation.
Inundation Overlay and/or the Special
Building Overlay for land at 105 This submission was late and sent
Trotting Terrace, Junortoun to include directly to the Panel for
only those areas affected by flooding consideration. The City and the
from the unnamed tributary of Splitters NCCMA have since considered the
Creek. mapping, amended it as per the
recommendation, and consulted
with the landowner.
4 Review the base modelling of the BMT Accept the Panels
WBM model against the Water recommendation.
Technology model to identify if there
are any discrepancies, which warrant a Modelling reviewed and no revision
revision of the flooding overlays in the of overlays recommended at this
Epsom/Huntly area. time. See discussion below.
5 Adopt the changes shown in the maps Accept the Panels

in Appendix D to the coverage of the recommendation.
Land Subject to Inundation Overlay
and the Special Building Overlay. These changes were proposed by
the NCCMA and the City in
response to submissions received.
6 Amend Schedule 1 of the Land Subject Accept the Panels
to Inundation Overlay and Schedule 2 recommendation.
of the Special Building Overlay under
New or replacement buildings to This recommendation was
include the following additional permit presented to the Panel following
requirement: negotiations by the City with the
A relocatable building associated owner of the Gold Nugget Tourist
with a caravan park where floor Park who made a submission.
levels are at least 300mm above
the 1% AEP Flood level.
PAGE 50
Rec.
No.
7 Replace the fifth dot point under Other Accept the Panels
buildings and works in Schedules 1 recommendation.
and 2 of the Land Subject to
Inundation Overlay to read:
A curtain style fence for a tennis
court if constructed in accordance
with the requirements of the
Bendigo Local Floodplain
Development Plan 2016.
8 Amend Section 5.1 of the Bendigo Accept the Panels
Local Floodplain Development Plan recommendation.
2016 by introducing the following dot
point under Subdivisions in the Low
Density Residential Zone or Rural
Living Zone:
All new lots and new road reserves
are set back a minimum of 30
metres from any waterway.
9 Update the Section 8 Flood Risk Guide Accept the Panels
map of the Bendigo Local Floodplain recommendation.
Development Plan 2016 in accordance
with the changes agreed to by Council
and shown in Appendix D to the Land
Subject to Inundation Overlay and
Special Building Overlay mapping.
Further work undertaken since receipt of Panel report
Two additional reports have been received by the City since receipt of the Panel Report:
1. Rae Moran Report Historical Floods vs Bendigo Urban Flood Study Modelling (Has
Bendigo seen a 1 in 100 year Flood)
This report reviews the February 1973 and January 2011 rainfall events, and compares
the events and subsequent catchment wetness to major flood events. The report
recommended that the February 1973 and January 2011 storm events be modelled as
part of the BUFS to build community confidence.
In response, the City believes that modelling the February 1973 event would be very
difficult and there would be a significant margin of error, as many alterations have
occurred to the flood paths since, and only daily rainfall figures are available rather than
the 30min interval data used now. Use of daily rainfall data rather than 30 minute rainfall
figures in modelling would reduce or flatten the peak flows as consistent rainfall is
assumed over the day. Further modelling has occurred using the January 2011 data, as
discussed below.
PAGE 51
2. Rae Moran Report The Bendigo Urban Flood Study & Climate Change
This report discusses climate change and its potential impacts on the BUFS and
recommends that these potential impacts be explored.
When the modelling for the BUFS was undertaken in 2011/12, there were no
Government guidelines or advice on how to consider climate change and its potential
effects on rainfall intensity and flooding. The Victorian Government still does not have a
definitive position on the impact of climate change on flooding with the State policy
benchmark for flood planning being the 1 in 100 year flood event. Consequently, the
proposed planning scheme flooding maps do not include a consideration of climate
change effects.
Predicted effects from climate change include more intense and possibly more frequent
storm events and flash flooding. Any future flood mitigation studies should consider the
impacts of climate change.
The Panel in response to submissions on climate change stated that it was satisfied that
the Amendment was soundly based given the current State planning policy directions.
Despite the Amendment being supported by the Panel, there have still been some
concerns in the community about the accuracy of the BUFS prepared by Water
Technology, particularly in relation to the input data used and the template modelling
being undertaken by BMT WBM for the Epsom Ascot Huntly Floodplain Management
Study.
In response to these concerns, the City has undertaken some further work to test the
BUFS.
1. Ground survey comparison with LIDAR (Light Imaging, Detection, and Ranging
survey)
The City undertook a GPS ground survey to enable a comparison with LIDAR survey
data used in the Flood Model. Surveys were undertaken at various locations along the
Bendigo Creek corridor from Kangaroo Flat to Huntly. Results found that the LIDAR
survey data was within an acceptable tolerance.
2. Independent review of the BUFS against the BMT WBM Template model
At the request of the City and the NCCMA, the DELWP Flood Management unit, which
funded both studies, commissioned an independent review of the BUFS against the
findings of the BMT WBM study. This review, by the University of New South Wales,
found that:
All flood models are approximations of flood behaviour, especially in complex
floodplains such as Bendigo.
Both Water Technology and BMT WBM have generally followed best practice
modelling principles in developing the BUFS model and the Template model.
The BUFS report itself could have been improved by better documentation of
information, analysis and outcomes.
PAGE 52
Many of the criticisms of the BUFS model by BMT WBM are minor in nature and do
not substantially change the BUFS outputs; less than 5% of the area of extent
different and depth differences predominantly within 0.25 metres. These minor
differences would be accommodated in the LSIO anyway which has a freeboard of
300mm on top of the 1 in 100 year level for planning purposes.
Adequate ground truthing of the BUFS occurred through the extensive Study
consultation programme and the following amendment.
In summary, the outcome of this independent review was that the BUFS is appropriate to
be used as a basis for the planning scheme amendment and subsequent overlays.
3. Modelling of the January 2011 to determine whether it was a 1 in 100 year event.
In response to a community request and further information provided in the Rae Moran
report, Water Technology was engaged to model the January 2011 rainfall event. Water
Technology achieved a reasonable calibration between the model and stream gauges,
photos and observed flood levels. The model determined that the flow results for the
January 2011 event were:
Bendigo Creek in Bendigo, flow was less than 5 year storm event.
Bendigo Creek at Huntly, flow was just below a 10 year storm event.
Back Creek at Ascot, flow was just below a 20 year storm event.
The modelling also confirmed the results of the Flood Study.
Since the Panel hearing, the NCCMA has also reviewed the BMT WBM template model
against the BUFS in accordance with recommendation 4 of the Panel.
The flood modelling undertaken by BMT WBM in the Epsom Huntly area has further
refined the flood modelling undertaken by Water Technology, which was done on a
regional basis to inform the planning scheme amendment.
The BMT WBM base modelling outputs were compared with the exhibited overlay maps
and only minor differences between the two were found.
There are some areas in the BMT WBM report that have been identified as having
greater flooding risk, but most of these areas are already in the proposed SBO2
(unconstructed levee) area so would require planning approval for development
anyway. Other increased risk areas in this report were determined to be no longer due
to recently approved development and filling, and one was protected by a levee bank
that had not been included in the BMT WBM model.
There are some minor areas where flooding is less in the BMT WBM model than in the
BUFS but these areas are also within the SBO2 area and would still require a planning
permit for development. Once a permit application is applied for, the most recent and
accurate data would be used to design the development.
PAGE 53
Due to the minor differences in mapping between the two studies, the City and the
NCCMA believe that the proposed amendment is appropriate at this stage, and
subsequently, when the Epsom Ascot Huntly Floodplain Management Study (mitigation
project) is completed and implemented, that the flood overlays be comprehensively
reviewed and a planning scheme amendment undertaken at that time.
Conclusion
This amendment is the culmination of many years of work by the City and the NCCMA.
Its adoption will provide vastly improved Planning Scheme information for managing
flood risk.
It is recommended that Council adopt the Amendment with changes as recommended by

the Panel and forward the adopted Amendment to the Minister for Planning to approve.
This will complete the Amendment process.
Options
Council has the option of:

Adopting the Amendment in accordance with the Panels recommendations and
sending to the Minister for Planning for Approval.
Adopting the Amendment in part.
Abandoning the Amendment under the Planning and Environment Act 1987. There is
no right of review of a council's decision not to support the Amendment.
Adopting the Amendment as exhibited.
The Amendment is not expected to have any adverse effects on the resources and
administrative costs of the City of Greater Bendigo. The Amendment will result in more
planning applications for flood management but this is necessary to protect the
community from flooding, and fees will cover these costs. Also the Local Flood Plain
Development Plan and permit exemptions reduce the permit burden.
Since the Panel hearing, the City has spent a $6,500 on further modelling.
The City is responsible for payment of statutory fees and costs incurred in the processing
of the Amendment, which includes:
A fee of $22,000 for the Planning Panel hearing
A fee of $10,000 for our Expert Witness (Water Technology) at the Panel hearing
A fee of $462 for the Minister for Planning to consider the request to approve the
amendment.
These costs were included in the 2016/17 and 2017/18 budgets.
PAGE 54
Attachments
Explanatory report.
Summary table of submissions
PAGE 55
2.4 46-50 & 54-56 HIGH STREET, 65 SHORT STREET AND 80 WATTLE
STREET, BENDIGO - ASPIRE PRECINCT
Author Shannon Rosewarne, Senior Planner

Director
Summary/Purpose
Application details: Use and development of land for a Place of Assembly

(theatre, library learning centre, exhibition space, meeting
space and hall) and food and drink premises, partial
demolition of existing building and brick retaining wall,
demolition of fences, waiver of parking, liquor licence, signage
and alteration of access to a road in a Road Zone 1.
Application No: DU/250/2017
Applicant: Catholic Diocese Sandhurst
Land: 46-50 & 54-56 High Street & 65 Short Street Bendigo
Zoning: Commercial 1 Zone
Special Use Zone 1
Road Zone 1
Overlays: Heritage Overlay 12 & 288
Parking Overlay 1
Design and Development Overlay 20
No. of objections: 7
Consultation 1 August 2017
meeting:
Key considerations: Car parking
Heritage significance
Liquor licence
Amenity impacts
Conclusion: The application is recommended for approval on the basis
that it represents an acceptable outcome with regards to the
requirements of the Greater Bendigo Planning Scheme.
The report considers the permit application and recommends

that the Council issues a Notice of Decision to Grant a
Planning Permit with appropriate conditions.
PAGE 56
RECOMMENDATION
Pursuant to section 61 of the Planning and Environment Act (1987), Greater Bendigo
City Council resolve to issue a Notice of Decision to Grant a Permit for Use and
development of land for a Place of Assembly (theatre, library learning centre, exhibition
space, meeting space and hall) and food and drink premises, partial demolition of
existing building and brick retaining wall, demolition of fences, waiver of parking, liquor
licence, signage and alteration of access to a road in a Road Zone 1 at 46-50 and 54-56
High Street, 65 Short Street and 80 Wattle Street Bendigo subject to the conditions at the
end of this report.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Policy Context

Planning, developments and infrastructure that increase our liveability and pride in
where we live.
Recognise and celebrate our unique history and diverse cultures.
Report
Subject Site and Surrounds
The subject site comprises a number of parcels which form four properties known as 65
Short Street, 46-50 and 54-56 High Street and 80 Wattle Street, Bendigo, which together
form the Aspire Precinct site.
No. 65 Short Street is occupied by a small parish hall featuring a slate roof, timber
trusses and decorative cream brickwork. The parish hall is currently used for meetings
and church functions and can cater for up to 80 patrons.
46-50 High Street, located on the corner of Short and High Streets, is developed with the
former Haymes Paint shop, a single storey construction.
54-56 High Street was previously used as a car park in association with the paint shop.
The above three properties are zoned Commercial 1 Zone and are affected by Heritage
Overlay 12, Design and Development Overlay 20 and Parking Overlay 1.
80 Wattle Street contains the Sacred Heart Cathedral, which is zoned Special Use Zone
1 (Private Educational or Religious Institutions), and is affected by Heritage Overlay 288
and the Victorian Heritage Register (VHR) 1340, and Parking Overlay 1.
PAGE 57
There is a significant level difference of approximately 8 metres over the site, with the
gradient gradually increasing from High Street towards the Sacred Heart Cathedral.
High Street is an arterial road zoned Road Zone Category 1 and is managed by
VicRoads. It has a speed limit of 60km/hour with two lanes of traffic in each direction,
with kerbside parking. High Street also contains a tram line. The High and Short Streets
intersection is signalised.
Short Street, Wattle Street and Mackenzie Street are local streets which cater for one
lane of traffic in each direction and angled and/or parallel parking.
Figure 1: Location map showing subject site. Objectors' properties are marked with a star.
Proposal
The proposal involves the use and development of the site for the purpose of a place of
assembly (theatre, library learning centre, exhibition space, meeting space and hall) and
food and drink premises.
The former paint shop building will be converted into a place of assembly which will
comprise an immersive theatre, library learning centre, exhibition space and meeting
space with associated office, retail space, storage and reception areas. It will feature a
large geodesic dome structure on the roof.
The existing parish hall will be modified and extended, with a new caf, meeting room,
foyer area, toilet facilities, lift and associated lobby, plant and waste storage area added.
Proposed materials include bluestone tile cladding, composite sheet metal cladding to
the geodesic dome and the corner of the building in colours to match the tones of the
Cathedrals stone palette, rendered finish in a neutral colour, glazing, metal screens.
The proposal also involves extensive landscaping works which include the construction
of a bluestone paved forecourt and new bluestone stairway to connect the site to the
Sacred Heart Cathedral. (A small portion of the new staircase will be located on the
Cathedral site, however no other works are proposed within this part of the site, known
as 80 Wattle Street.) A timber pergola and shade sails will be constructed along part of
the eastern side of the forecourt area.
PAGE 58
The works will involve the partial demolition of the existing parish hall by removing part of
the northern and eastern walls, demolition of a timber deck and verandah and a toilet
block to allow for the new extensions. The proposal also involves removal of sections of
wall on the northern and western elevations of the former paint shop to create new
openings and connections to the redeveloped parish hall. Partial demolition of a brick
wall on the sites Short Street boundary, and the demolition of another brick retaining wall
and wire fence internal to the site are also proposed.
There is a 5 metre level difference between the two buildings and some excavation will
be required to install a lift and create a service area. Underpinning of the parish hall
building will be required.
The proposal also seeks approval for a waiver of parking, a liquor licence, signage and
alteration of access to a road in a Road Zone 1. Signage comprises signs on the
interpretive centres High and Short Street faades and a sign on the boundary wall on
Short Street adjacent to the parish hall.
Figure 2: Proposed demolition plan lower level
PAGE 59
Figure 3: Proposed demolition plan upper level
Figure 4: Proposed site layout plan and red line licensed area
PAGE 60
Figure 5: Proposed lower level floor plan
Figure 6: Proposed upper level floor plan
PAGE 61
Figure 7: Short Street elevation
Figure 8: Forecourt elevation
Figure 9: North elevation
Figure 10: High Street elevation
PAGE 62
Figure 11: Perspective image (High St)
Planning Controls - Greater Bendigo Planning Scheme
The following clauses are relevant in the consideration of this proposal:
State Planning Policy Framework

Clause 11 Settlement
Clause 11.07 Regional Victoria
Clause 11.14 Loddon Mallee South
Clause 13.04-1 Noise abatement
Clause 13.03-1 Use of contaminated and potentially contaminated land
Clause 15.01-1 Urban design
Clause 15.01-2 Urban design principles
Clause 15.03 Heritage conservation
Clause 17 Economic development
Clause 17.01 Business
Clause 18.02-5 Car parking
Municipal Strategic Statement

Clause 21.02 Key issues and influences
Clause 21.07 Economic development
Clause 21.08 Environment
Clause 21.09 Integrated transport and infrastructure
Local Planning Policies

Clause 22.06 Heritage policy
Clause 22.08 Highway entrances and boulevards policy
Clause 22.27 Licensed premises policy
Clause 22.29 Advertising and signage policy
PAGE 63
Other Provisions
Clause 52.05 Advertising signs
Clause 52.06 Car parking
Clause 52.07 Loading and Unloading
Clause 52.27 Licensed premises
Clause 52.29 Land adjacent to a Road Zone Category 1, or a Public Acquisition
Overlay for a Category 1 Road
A planning permit is required to use land for a place of assembly in the Commercial 1
Zone under Clause 34.04-1 of the Planning Scheme. Food and drink premises do not
require a planning permit under this zone.
Buildings and works require a permit under the Commercial Zone (Clause 34.04-4),
Special Use Zone 1 (Clause 37.01-4), Design and Development Overlay (Clause 43.02-
2) and Heritage Overlay (Clause 43.01-1). Demolition and advertising signs also require
a planning permit under the Heritage Overlay, with signage also requiring a permit under
the Advertising Sign Provisions at Clause 52.05.
A waiver of car parking requires a permit under Clause 52.06-3 of the Car Parking
provisions.
A liquor licence requires a planning permit under Clause 52.27 (Licensed Premises).
Alterations to an access on a road in a Road Zone 1 requires a permit under Clause
52.29 of the Planning Scheme.
Referrals
The following authorities and internal departments have been consulted on the proposal:
Referral Comment
VicRoads No objection, subject to conditions.
Country Fire Authority No objection, no conditions requested.
Heritage Victoria No objection, no conditions requested.
Public Transport Victoria No objection, subject to conditions.
Department of No objection, subject to conditions.
Environment, Land, Water
and Planning
Environment Protection No objection, subject to conditions
Authority
Traffic & Design No objection, subject to conditions.
Drainage No objection, no conditions requested.
PAGE 64
Referral Comment
Heritage Advisor No objection. Recommended some modifications to the
proposal in relation to the proposed changes to
boundary walls which will be required as a condition of
permit.
Public Notification
The application was advertised by way of notice on the site and letters to adjoining and
nearby owners and occupiers.
As a result of advertising, 7 objections were received, with the grounds of objection

being:
Concerns regarding the proposed waiver of 40 car spaces.
Parking in the area is already difficult due to on street parking being taken by CBD
workers, employees, parents and students of the nearby school, visitors to the
Cathedral and tourists.
Tourist buses and cars are already double parking outside the Cathedral because no
parking is available.
There is insufficient on street parking available in the area. No on-site parking for the
proposal will be detrimental to the amenity of the area and adversely impact on
residential and commercial property owners.
The proposal will lead to a loss of amenity for the residents in the surrounding area,
who already have problems with people parking over driveways and no available on
street spaces for residents, visitors, deliveries or tradespeople or the like to park on a
daily basis.
Resident permit parking should be provided to address parking problems faced by
residents in this area.
If the proposed development of the site is to be staged then provision should be
made for parking on site in the overall plan.
Concerns regarding the traffic report, including the extent of the area surveyed and
the period of time recorded, the likelihood of visitors to the site using alternative
modes of transport, and the claim that the proposed caf is unlikely to become a
destination in its own right.
Concerns that the proposal will result in a significant increase in visitors to the site
who will be more likely to travel by private car than other transport modes, and will
therefore require car parking.
Request for independent parking survey to be carried out.
Concerns regarding the potential for increased traffic congestion and safety, and loss
of any existing on street parking.
Crown land adjoining the site should be considered for off street parking.
PAGE 65
Concerns regarding potential amenity impacts associated with the use and liquor
licence, in particular hours of operation and increased activity near residential
properties at night.
Clarification is sought on whether the parish hall is of heritage significance.
A consultation meeting was held with the applicant and objectors; however the objections
were not resolved. The objections are discussed below.
Planning Assessment
Planning policy
The following clauses of the State and Local Planning Policy Framework and Municipal
Strategic Statement are the most relevant in the consideration of this application.
Clause 11 (Settlement) states that planning is to anticipate and respond to the needs of
existing and future communities through provision of zoned and serviced land for
housing, employment, recreation and open space, commercial and community facilities
and infrastructure. Planning is to recognise the need for, and as far as practicable
contribute towards, amongst other considerations, economic viability, a high standard of
urban design and amenity, energy efficiency and land use and transport integration.
Planning is also to prevent environmental problems created by siting incompatible land
uses close together. The proposal meets these objectives.
Clause 11.07 (Regional Victoria) aims to develop regions and settlements which have a
strong identity, are prosperous and are environmentally sustainable. Further to this,
Clause 11.14 (Loddon Mallee South) identifies Bendigo as a regional city and strategies
include supporting Bendigo as the major population and growth hub for the region, and
facilitating increased commercial and residential densities, mixed use development and
revitalisation projects for underutilised sites and land in Bendigo. This clause also seeks
to strengthen and diversify the economy, with one of the strategies to achieve this being
supporting and developing emerging and potential growth sectors, including tourism. The
proposal will support the objectives of these policies by reusing existing buildings and
making better use of underutilised land in urban Bendigo and supporting the tourism
sector.
Clause 13.03-1 (Use of contaminated and potentially contaminated land) has the
objective of ensuring that potentially contaminated land is suitable for its intended future
use and development, and that contaminated land is used safely. Investigations
undertaken by the applicant included a preliminary site assessment and soil testing,
which determined that the site is suitable for the proposal, subject to appropriate
remediation measures. Appropriate conditions will be placed on the permit to ensure
these are implemented.
PAGE 66
Clause 13.04-1 (Noise abatement) seeks to assist the control of noise effects on
sensitive land uses. Strategies to achieve this objective include ensuring that
development is not prejudiced and community amenity is not reduced by noise
emissions, using a range of building design, urban design and land use separation
techniques as appropriate to the land use functions and character of the area. The
design of the development has taken into account measures to minimise noise
emissions, through the careful location of plant and equipment. The main entrance to the
site is via High Street and the boundary walls along Short Street will assist in minimising
noise emissions from the expanded parish hall. Appropriate conditions will also be
placed on the permit about requirements to comply with EPA requirements regarding
noise.
Clause 15.01-1 (Urban design) seeks to create urban environments that are safe,
functional and provide good quality environments with a sense of place and cultural
identity.
Clause 15.01-2 (Urban design principles) aims to achieve architectural and urban design
outcomes that contribute positively to local urban character and enhance the public
realm while minimising detrimental impact on neighbouring properties. The application
provides an appropriate design response which has considered relevant urban design
principles including context, the public realm, safety, landmarks, views and vistas,
pedestrian spaces, heritage, energy and resource efficiency, architectural quality and
landscape architecture.
Clause 15.01-3 (Heritage conservation) seeks to ensure the conservation of places of

heritage significance. Strategies to achieve this objective include encouraging
appropriate development that respects places with identified heritage values and creates
a worthy legacy for future generations, retaining those elements that contribute to the
importance of the heritage place, encouraging the conservation and restoration of
contributory elements and supporting adaptive reuse of heritage buildings whose use
has become redundant.
Clause 17.01-1 (Business) aims to encourage development which meet the communitys
needs for retail, entertainment, office and other commercial services and provides net
community benefit in relation to accessibility, efficient infrastructure use and the
aggregation and sustainability of commercial facilities. The site is appropriately zoned for
a place of assembly of this nature.
Clause 18.02-5 (Car parking) has an objective of ensuring an adequate supply of car
parking that is appropriately designed and located. A waiver of car parking is sought as
part of the application. A partial reduction is appropriate in this instance, in addition to a
financial contribution in lieu of 14 spaces, to address the likely demand during business
hours, when on street parking less likely to be available. In time, this contribution will
provide for additional public parking within the CBD area, as discussed further below.
Clause 21.07 (Economic development) notes that Greater Bendigo is a key regional city
and major population and economic growth hub for the Loddon Mallee South region. The
proposal will make a positive contribution to the local economy and provide employment
opportunities in the tourism, education and hospitality industries.
PAGE 67
Clause 21.09 (Integrated transport and infrastructure) refers to the principles of ITLUS
(Connecting Greater Bendigo Integrated Transport and Land Use Strategy, 2015). One
of the objectives of this clause is to increase the number of residents and visitors who
walk or cycle, with a strategy to achieve this objective being to prioritise active transport
over private vehicle use. The proposal encourages the use of alternative modes of
transport through the provision of bicycle racks and shower facilities.
Clause 22.06 (Heritage Policy) seeks to maintain and enhance the significance of
heritage places while accommodating the needs of residents to adapt and develop such
places. Objectives of the policy include retaining heritage assets for the enjoyment,
education and experience of residents, visitors and future generations of the municipality,
ensuring that new development is sympathetic with the appearance and character and
maintains the significance of heritage places, including surrounding precincts, and
encouraging the sympathetic re-use and adaptation of heritage places so that such
places are maintained and enhanced. The proposal is consistent with these objectives.
An assessment of the proposal against the policy is provided below.
Clause 22.08 (Highway entrances and boulevards policy) recognises highways and other
main roads located in Greater Bendigo as significant assets which provide for important
transport opportunities and create an impression of the municipality. The proposal is
consistent with the objectives and requirements of this policy in that the development is
of an appropriate scale and design and will make a positive contribution to the High
Street streetscape. The design recognises the heritage qualities of the precinct and
adjoining Sacred Heart Cathedral. No new access points are proposed onto High Street,
existing street trees will be maintained, and the site is suitably zoned for commercial use
Clause 22.27 (Licensed Premises Policy) aims to manage licensed premises within the
City of Greater Bendigo, including location, patron capacity and hours of operation to
protect the amenity of surrounding areas and to reduce the incidence of anti-social
behaviour and the subsequent impact on the amenity of the area.
The proposal includes a liquor licence in association with the proposed caf and parish
hall. The parish hall will cater for functions of up to 120 patrons and it is anticipated that
the caf will have an area of 60 square metres. Outdoor areas used in conjunction with
these parts of the site are also proposed to be included within the licensed area.
The application generally meets the requirements of this policy. While the policy
discourages licensed premises within 100 metres of a residential area, this site is located
on the edge of the Bendigo CBD and is zoned Commercial 1 Zone. The proposed hours
of operation are considered reasonable in this context.
The site is located outside the identified Entertainment Precinct within the Bendigo CBD.
The caf will operate between 7.00am and 6.00pm. Hours of operation for the parish hall
have not been specified, however the proposed licensed hours are 10.00am 12.00am
seven days a week, with the exception of Good Friday and ANZAC Day where the hours
will be 12.00 noon to 12.00 am the following morning. The applicant has advised they
intend to become a signatory to the Bendigo Liquor Accord.
PAGE 68
The policy states that licensed premises are to provide car parking as required in
accordance with the Clause 52.06 (Car Parking). No car parking is proposed in this case.
It can be argued that there are many other examples of licensed premises which dont
provide for on-site car parking within the municipality. While on street parking in the
surrounding streets is typically heavily utilised during business hours, sufficient on street
parking is likely to be available outside business hours and on weekends to cater for the
anticipated peak periods for the premises, when functions are likely to be held.
Clause 22.29 contains the Citys Advertising and Signage Policy which seeks to protect
the public amenity of the municipality from distracting and dominating signage and
advertising, particularly in areas of high sensitivity including areas of heritage
significance, neighbourhood character, and along City and township entrances. The
proposed signage is consistent with the objectives and requirements of this policy.
Use
The proposal involves the use of the land for a place of assembly, which is defined as
land where people congregate for religious or cultural activities, entertainment, or
meetings.
The proposal is generally compatible with the surrounding area, which comprises a mix
of residential and commercial uses.
The interpretive centre will operate 7 days a week, generally from 9.00am to 6.00pm.
Evening sessions for special events or screenings may be held occasionally outside
these times. As noted above, the parish hall will operate up to 12.00am at night and will
be used for meetings, private functions and church events.
The application has been assessed against the decision guidelines of the zone and is
considered satisfactory. The zoning of the land allows for a range of commercial uses,
including retail, office, business, entertainment and community uses. The site is well
located close to the centre of Bendigo and can take advantage of existing infrastructure.
No adverse traffic impacts have been raised by the Citys Engineers or VicRoads.
Buildings and works/urban design
The proposed buildings and works have been considered against the requirements of the
Commercial 1 Zone and Design and Development Overlay 20 (DDO20).
The scale, design and appearance of the development are appropriate to the site and
surrounds. DDO12 relates to the High Street Boulevard (between Shamrock Street and
Short Street). This overlay seeks to promote High Street as a key boulevard entrance
and encourages higher scale, well designed development that promotes diversity in land
uses fronting High Street, and lower scale development where commercial sites interface
with residential properties, heritage buildings or provide protected views to the Central
Deborah Poppet Head and Sacred Heart Cathedral. The overlay encourages active
frontages along High Street and Short Street and car parking that has minimal impact on
the streetscape, and protection of street trees.
PAGE 69
The site is located within an area where the preferred height for new development is 14
metres (medium scale) under the DDO20. The height of the proposed extensions to the
parish hall will be in line with the existing eave height of the building, and the works to the
former paint shop will essentially involve recladding the exterior, creating some new
openings and installing the dome feature on the roof to a height of 13.1 metres. The
proposal is slightly lower than the preferred height of 14 metres, however the proposed
additions are relatively minor and will not dominate the streetscape or detract from views
to the Cathedral.
The proposed landscaping works, including the construction of the forecourt and
staircase, will complement the development, improve the appearance of the site and
make a positive contribution to the streetscape and provide pedestrian connections
through the site. Bicycle parking is proposed adjacent to the outdoor dining area within
the forecourt area, which will encourage visitors to the site to use alternative modes of
transport.
Provision has been made for service areas for storage, waste, plant and equipment.
Deliveries can be accommodated within the existing driveway area adjacent to the
Cathedral.
The design of the development has taken environmentally sustainable development

principles into account, including ventilation, double glazing, energy efficient lighting as
well as the adaptive reuse of existing buildings. The proposal has maintained an active
frontage to High Street as well as improved pedestrian connections from High Street to
the Sacred Heart Cathedral.
A detailed assessment of car parking demand and availability is provided below. Traffic
impacts have been considered by the Citys Traffic Engineer and VicRoads who had no
objection to the proposal subject to conditions, including that all existing unused access
points on High Street be removed with naturestrips, and kerb and channel reinstated,
that all deliveries and waste collection are to the site via Short Street, and that any
changes to on street parking on High Street will be subject to further plans and approval
by VicRoads.
It is recommended that a detailed landscaping plan, lighting plan, schedule of colours,

materials and finishes and a Construction Management Plan be required to be submitted
for approval as conditions of permit.
A preliminary environmental investigation was undertaken for the site which found that
there is some contamination present. The report recommended that the contaminated
material be removed and disposed of. The EPA had no objection to the application,
subject to conditions of permit requiring the preparation of a soil management plan, and
disposal of any contaminated material in accordance with EPA guidelines.
Car parking
The main concern objectors have raised about the proposal is the waiver of parking and
amenity impacts associated with increased on street parking, particularly in the
surrounding residential streets. No on-site parking is proposed to be provided as part of
the development.
PAGE 70
The objectors state that on-street parking within the streets adjoining the site is already
at capacity and residents and their visitors have difficulty accessing on street spaces due
to them usually being fully occupied by CBD workers during business hours. Some of the
objections have called for resident parking permits to address this issue. Objectors also
cited existing parking problems resulting from buses double parking within the vicinity of
the Cathedral.
Some of the objections also challenged assumptions made in the traffic report submitted
with the application.
Under the Planning Scheme, the proposal requires 40 spaces to be provided. The
existing premises currently provides for 8 spaces within an informal car park. These
spaces will be lost to facilitate the development on the site. A waiver of the total
requirement for 40 spaces has been sought.
The site is also affected by Schedule 1 to the Parking Overlay which seeks:
To provide car parking in the Bendigo City Centre that promotes a vibrant and
efficient use of urban space, encourages sustainable transport options and reflects
the conditions, opportunities and needs of the area.
To provide future parking through a combination of on-site and off-site parking, with
preference for the provision of off-site public parking facilities in strategic locations.
To provide for the collection of financial contributions to contribute to the construction
of public car parking facilities. To implement sustainable transport initiatives which
reduce demand for parking within the precinct.
The application has been assessed against the decision guidelines at Clause 52.06-7
(Car Parking provisions) and Clause 45.09-5 (Parking Overlay) of the Planning Scheme.
A Traffic and Transport Impact Assessment was submitted as part of the application. It
included a survey of car parking availability in the vicinity of the site and a car parking
demand assessment for the proposal. The survey was undertaken on 9 and 10
December 2016 between 9.00am and 5.00pm. The survey recorded on and off street car
parking availability within 400 metres walking distance of the site.
A total of 1,420 on street car spaces and off street car spaces within public car parks
were recorded within this area, with 723 spaces within the survey area being unrestricted
on and off street spaces. The survey found that there was a vacancy of 241 spaces
overall during the peak period, with 77 of these spaces being unrestricted spaces. As
such, there is a relatively low vacancy rate of approximately 10% during peak periods,
meaning that there is high demand for long term spaces within this locality, however by
5pm a minimum of 343 unrestricted spaces were available within the study area.
The report stated that the use is expected to generate a demand for 14 spaces
throughout the day, incorporating 6 staff (long term) and 8 visitor (short term) spaces. It
further stated that when the parish hall is booked at capacity, this demand could be
increased by a further 12 spaces. The assessment makes some assumptions that actual
demand for spaces could be reduced based on patrons (visitors to the city) making a
multi-purpose trip to the CBD area, and the likelihood of groups, e.g. tours or schools,
and other visitors travelling to the site by bus or tram.
PAGE 71
As noted previously, line-marked on-street parking is available along High Street, Short
Street, Mackenzie Street and Wattle Street. Some of these spaces are time restricted for
short term parking. The Citys Parking Unit advised parking restrictions on Short Street
immediately adjacent to the site could be reviewed once the use starts operating, with
potential to change a number of currently unrestricted spaces to time restricted parking.
The applicant has indicated they would be prepared to pay any necessary costs for new
signage to achieve this, however this type of parking review sits outside the planning
permit assessment process as it relates to Councils parking policies, and should not be
imposed as a condition of permit.
Public transport is available to the site, with bus routes No.5 and No.64 operating along
High Street, with stops near Short Street. As such, there is potential for patrons and staff
to use public transport to access the site. The application also notes the tram line runs
along High Street, with stops at Myrtle Street and View Street.
In response to objectors' requests for resident parking permits, under the Citys current
Resident Parking Permit Policy, permits are only issued where properties do not have
off-street parking (ie. no driveway), have no reasonable opportunity to modify the
property to provide parking and where directly adjacent on-street parking is time
restricted. There would be very few residential properties in the vicinity of the site that
would likely meet these criteria. It is noted that the Community Plan for 2017-2021
includes an action to review the Bendigo CBD Parking Strategy in 2018, which will
include the Resident Parking Policy.
There is no record of any previous contributions for the site made towards the provision
of car parking facilities. Limited opportunity exists for parking within the site, without
compromising the design of the proposal, and considering the topography of the land.
The overall benefits of the proposal will outweigh the need to provide the full number of
on-site spaces, and the current proposal will make more efficient use of the land.
A number of bicycle racks are proposed to be provided on site, and the proposed new
amenities will include shower facilities which could serve an end of trip need, if staff were
to cycle to work.
It is likely that there is sufficient on street capacity to cater for the peak demand
generated by the use within a reasonable walking distance of the site. It is likely that the
peak periods for the parish hall will be outside normal business hours, when there will be
less take up of the on street parking by CBD workers and staff and parents associated
with the nearby school.
It is recognised that demand for unrestricted parking close to the CBD area is high and
there is limited vacancy in the existing on street spaces. However, taking into account
local policy which seeks to minimise reliance on private vehicles and promote alternative
forms of transport, the location of the site on the edge of the CBD, the likely demand for
car spaces, the availability and proximity of public transport the site, and the parking
survey finding that there is a limited vacancy available within surrounding on street and
public parking areas, it is considered that a partial reduction in the total number of
spaces is appropriate in this case.
PAGE 72
As demand for on street spaces is high in this location, it is recommended that 14 car
spaces should be offset by a payment-in-lieu. This is based on the lower end of the
estimated demand generated by the use. A condition of permit will require payment of
the full amount prior to the occupation of the development, or alternatively, payment via
instalments, as per a Section 173 Agreement over a period of 5 years, commencing one
year after the date the development is occupied. Over time, this contribution will be used
towards providing additional public parking or parking solutions within the CBD area.
Heritage
The site forms part of Heritage Overlay 12 which relates to the Short Street Precinct
identified within the Eaglehawk and Bendigo Heritage Study (1993). The Study notes that
this precinct contains some of Bendigos most prestigious private residences, typically
grouped close to the citys ecclesiastical buildings. It contains some of the first residential
allotments sold in the township and some of the earliest church buildings and reserves.
Some of the objections received sought clarification on whether the parish hall building is
of heritage significance.
The buildings on the site have not been identified as being of individual significance. The
former paint shop dates from the late 20th century and is not contributory to the precinct.
The parish hall has a cream brick faade circa 1950s-60s but it has a slate roof, which
suggests the building was constructed at an earlier date. The timber verandah and the
toilet block which are proposed to be demolished appear to be later additions.
The application has been assessed against the Citys Heritage Policy at Clause 22.06 of
the Planning Scheme and the decision guidelines of the Heritage Overlay, and the
proposed buildings and works are considered an appropriate outcome.
The proposal was generally supported by the Citys Heritage Advisor, however it was
recommended that some minor modifications to the proposal be made with regard to
changes to the existing brick boundary wall. As noted previously, part of the existing
cream brick boundary wall is proposed to be removed to create a pedestrian link to the
site from Short Street, and a new section of wall is to be constructed.
The scheme to revitalise this important site is supported. The buildings themselves
make little contribution to the precinct and all changes are supported except for rendering
over the brickwork (for the boundary wall). The extensive cream brickwork is now over
half a century old and has a patina and texture which complements and contributes to
the precinct. The Statement of Significance specifically mentions roadside detail in the
form of planting and garden wall using brick and stone, and matching protrusions of
natural stone often occurring at the street edge.
PAGE 73
A render is unlikely to age well or create the finely textured natural finish of a good brick
wall. The section of wall to be demolished has interesting brick detailing to match the
building, and a nicely aged coping. The change to the line of wall is not opposed,
however the reuse of the existing materials is preferred to an entirely new short section
of rendered wall. It would be preferable to retain a consistent wall material along Short
Street and rebuild the new section of wall by reusing the cream bricks if possible and
reinstating the coping and the decorative narrow brick pattern which provides a visual tie
between the wall and the building.
The proposal meets the intent of the policy and Heritage Overlay. Much of the parish hall
building will be retained and the proposed extensions will be clearly delineated as new
additions to the site. The scale of the additions will maintain the prominence of the
existing parish hall. The proposed signage is appropriate to the scale of the building, is
appropriately located and will not be dominant within the streetscape.
Overall, the proposal will not adversely affect the significance of the heritage place. The
location, bulk, form and appearance of the proposed additions and the proposed
materials are acceptable within the streetscape. The changes recommended for the
boundary wall will be required as a condition of permit.
Liquor licence
Some concerns were raised by objectors about increased activity at night, uncertainty
about the proposed hours of operation, concern about potential amenity impacts on
residents in Short Street.
The proposed licensed area will include the parish hall and extension, an outdoor paved
area adjoining this, the proposed caf and an outdoor area forming part of the proposed
paved forecourt. The caf will generally operate between 7.00am and 6.00pm.
While the proposed changes to expand the parish hall to cater for up to 120 patrons are
likely to result in some additional pedestrian and vehicle movements on Short Street,
particularly during the evenings and on weekends, the proposed hours of operation are
not excessive, do not exceed those recommended in the Citys policy and are considered
reasonable given the context of the site and nature of the use. The parish hall is already
used for meetings and church functions for both day time and evening events throughout
the week and currently caters for up to 80 patrons. Alcohol consumption is likely to occur
along with the serving of meals.
Appropriate conditions are proposed on the permit to limit the hours in which alcohol can
be served on the site and number of patrons able to be accommodated within the parish
hall premises, and require music and noise levels to be in accordance with EPA
requirements to ensure amenity impacts can be effectively managed.
PAGE 74
Conclusion
Overall, the proposal will have positive economic and social impacts for the city and is a
good planning outcome. The proposal presents an appropriate urban design for the site
and will enable the effective reuse of existing buildings within central Bendigo, without
adversely impacting on the Sacred Heart Cathedral, which is of State level heritage
significance, or the wider heritage precinct.
The use will support the local hospitality, tourism and education sectors and provide
employment opportunities. A partial reduction in the number of car spaces required for
the use is considered appropriate, in addition to a financial contribution in lieu of 14 cars
spaces for the reasons outlined above.
Appropriate conditions on the permit will ensure amenity impacts can be effectively
managed.
It is therefore recommended that Council support the proposal and issue a Notice of
Decision to Grant a Permit, subject to conditions.
Options
Council, acting as the responsible authority for administering the Planning Scheme, may
resolve to: grant a permit, grant a permit with conditions, or refuse to grant a permit.
Attachments
Objections
Proposed Notice of Decision Conditions
1. MODIFIED PLAN REQUIRED

Before the use and/or development start(s), amended plans to the satisfaction of
the responsible authority must be submitted to and approved by the responsible
authority. When approved, the plans will be endorsed and will then form part of
the permit. The plans must be drawn to scale with dimensions and two copies
must be provided. The plans must be generally in accordance with the plans
submitted with the application but modified to show:
(a) The reuse of the existing materials and reinstatement of coping and
decorative narrow brick pattern in the reconstructed section of boundary wall
and deletion of reference to rendered finish.
(b) The deletion of bollards on High Street, the removal of existing crossovers
and the reinstatement of kerb and channel.
(c) Dimensions and areas of advertising signs
(d) A lighting plan for any external lighting to be installed on the site.
2. PLANS NOT TO BE ALTERED

The use permitted by this permit as described in the endorsed documents and
shown in the endorsed plans must not be altered or modified (for any reason)
except with the prior written consent of the responsible authority.
PAGE 75
3. SERVICE OF ALCOHOL
Except with the prior written consent of the responsible authority, the serving of
liquor permitted by this permit may only occur between the following times:
Monday Sunday between 10 am and 12am
Good Friday and Anzac Day between 12 noon and 12 am.
4. LIQUOR LICENCE DOCUMENT

The applicant must provide (for Council records) an original copy of any new
liquor licence within 1 month of issue by Liquor Licensing Victoria.
5. MAXIMUM PATRON NUMBERS

No more than 120 patrons may be present on the Parish Hall premises at any
one time without the written consent of the responsible authority.
6. CONTROL OF MUSIC NOISE

Noise levels emanating from the premises must comply with the recommended
levels as set out in the guidelines for the Control of Music Noise from Public
Premises State Environment Protection Policy No. N-2 to the satisfaction of the
responsible authority.
7. COMPLY WITH STATE NOISE POLICY N-1

Noise emissions must comply with State Environment Protection Policy (Control
of Noise from Commerce, Industry and Trade) No. N-1.
8. AMENITY OF LOCALITY
The use permitted by this permit must not, in the opinion of the responsible
authority, adversely affect the amenity of the locality by means of noise
emissions, and / or patron behaviour.
9. LOADING AND UNLOADING

The loading and unloading of vehicles and the delivery of goods must at all times
be undertaken within the boundaries of the subject land.
10. SCHEDULE OF MATERIALS

Prior to the commencement of development a schedule of the proposed
materials and colours to be used for the building, including samples, shall be
submitted to and approved in writing by the responsible authority.
11. GENERAL EXTERIOR TREATMENT

The exterior treatment of the building(s) permitted by this permit including all
exterior decoration, materials, finishes and colours must be to the satisfaction of
the responsible authority. The exterior treatment of the building(s) must be
maintained to the satisfaction of the responsible authority.
12. REFRIGERATION AND AIR CONDITIONING EQUIPMENT

Any equipment required for refrigeration, air-conditioning, heating and the like
must be suitably insulated to EPA standards for the purpose of reducing noise
emissions and must be located so as to not be highly visible from the street to
the satisfaction of the responsible authority.
PAGE 76
13. PLANT, EQUIPMENT OR FEATURES ON ROOF

No plant, equipment, services or architectural features other than those shown
on the endorsed plans are permitted above the roof level of the building(s)
without the written consent of the responsible authority.
14. LANDSCAPE PLAN

Before the development starts, a landscape plan to the satisfaction of the
responsible authority must be submitted to and approved by the responsible
authority. When approved, the plan will be endorsed and will then form part of
the permit. The plan must be drawn to scale with dimensions and two copies
must be provided.
The plan must show:

(a) Details of surface finishes of paved areas and retaining walls
(b) Planting schedule of all proposed trees including botanical names, common
names, pot sizes, sizes at maturity, and quantities of each plant
All species selected must be to the satisfaction of the responsible authority.
15. LANDSCAPING WORKS

Before the use/occupation of the development starts or by such later date as is
approved by the responsible authority in writing, the landscaping works shown on
the endorsed plans must be carried out and completed to the satisfaction of the
responsible authority.
16. LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE

The landscaping shown on the endorsed plans must be maintained to the
satisfaction of the responsible authority, including that any dead, diseased or
damaged plants are to be replaced.
17. GENERAL DRAINAGE

The proposed building(s) and works must be drained to the satisfaction of the
City of Greater Bendigo as the responsible drainage authority.
18. FINANCIAL CONTRIBUTION IN LIEU OF CAR SPACES

Prior to the occupation of the development the applicant or owner must either:
(a) Pay the City of Greater Bendigo the amount of $150,674.58 being payment-
in-lieu of providing 14 car spaces on site; or
(b) Enter into a section 173 agreement to pay the amount of $150,674.58 being
payment-in-lieu of providing 14 car spaces by annual instalment, with the first
payment to commence on the first anniversary of the completion of the
development, and subsequent payments to be made over a period of 5 years.
19. VEHICLE CROSSING REMOVAL

All disused or redundant vehicle crossings must be removed and the area
reinstated to kerb and channel to the satisfaction of the responsible authority.
20. CONSENT FOR WORK ON ROAD RESERVES

A Works within Road Reserves permit must be obtained from the City of Greater
Bendigo Engineering Unit prior to any work commencing in the road reserve.
PAGE 77
The applicant must comply with:

(a) The Road Management Act 2004,
(b) Road Management (Works and Infrastructure) Regulations 2005, and
(c) Road Management (General) Regulations 2005
with respect to any requirements to notify the Coordinating Authority and/or seek
consent from the Coordinating Authority to undertake works (as defined in the
Act) in, over or under the road reserve. The responsible authority in the inclusion
of this condition on this planning permit is not deemed to have been notified of,
or to have given consent, to undertake any works within the road reserve as
proposed in this permit.
21. CONSTRUCTION PHASE

All activities associated with the construction of the development permitted by
this permit must be carried out to the satisfaction of the responsible authority and
all care must be taken to minimise the effect of such activities on the amenity of
the locality.
22. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN

Prior to commencement of the development, a detailed construction and
demolition management plan must be submitted to and be approved by the
Responsible Authority. The construction management plan must include at a
minimum the following items:
(a) Proposed operating hours, noise and vibration controls
(b) Dust management
(c) Traffic management including loading and unloading provision for
construction materials
(d) Proposed parking provision and how this will be managed
(e) Details of notification process for noisier related activities such as demolition
and excavation to affected neighbours. This should include giving as much
notice as possible.
(f) Details of the extent of periods of noise activities and how they will be
undertaken to minimise impact on nearby neighbours.
(g) Appointment of principal contact person on-site for community enquiries.
23. VICROADS
The loading and unloading of goods associated with this development must be
undertaken from Short Street. That is, the loading and unloading of goods is not
permitted onto High Street.
24. VICROADS
The collection of waste must be undertaken on the local road and not onto High
Street.
25. VICROADS
Prior to the commencement of any development within the subject land, a plan
must be submitted and approved by the Roads Corporation showing the:
(a) Removal of the three existing driveway laybacks on High Street
(b) The reinstatement of the naturestrip area on High Street; and
(c) Any amended on-street parking and parking signs.
26. VICROADS
PAGE 78
Prior to the development hereby approved comes into use, all vehicular
crossover removal and on-street parking works must be completed to the
satisfaction of and at no cost to the Roads Corporation.
27. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, LAND, WATER AND PLANNING

(a) No access is permitted to the subject land via the Crown land.
(b) Adjoining Crown land must not be used for truck turning areas, entry points,
parking areas or temporary stack sites during the construction of buildings or
works.
(c) No polluted and/or sediment laden runoff is to be discharged directly or
indirectly onto Crown land. Overland flows must be maintained at the same
rate post-development as on the undeveloped land.
28. PUBLIC TRANSPORT VICTORIA

The permit holder must take all reasonable steps to ensure that disruption to bus
operation along High Street is kept to a minimum during the construction of the
development. Foreseen disruptions to bus operations and mitigation measures
must be communicated to Public Transport Victoria fourteen (14) days prior.
29. ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION AUTHORITY

(a) A Soil Management Plan, taking into account the recommendations of the
Geotechnical and Preliminary Environmental Investigation prepared by GTS
Geotechnical Testing Services dated September 2015, must be prepared and
implemented.
(b) All soil is to be handled in accordance with EPA Publication IWRG621 Soil
Hazard Categorisation and Management 2009 or as amended.
(c) All industrial waste generated during construction must be managed in
accordance with EPAs Industrial Waste Resource Guidelines 2009.
30. EXPIRY DATE

This permit will expire if the development permitted by this permit is not
completed and the use permitted by this permit is not commenced within 2 years
from the date hereof or if the use is discontinued for a period of 2 years. The
time within which the development must be completed and the use must
commence may, on written request made before or within 6 months after the
expiry of this permit where the development has not yet started or 12 months
where the development has commenced, be extended by the responsible
authority.
PAGE 79
2.5 BENDIGO FREIGHT STUDY
Author Katherine Wrzesinski
Responsible Bernie O'Sullivan, Director Strategy and Growth

Director
Purpose
To outline the results of the Bendigo Freight Study and to seek Councils support to
commence implementation of the Study recommendations.
Summary
The Bendigo Freight Study provides detailed information about who moves what, where
how and why in Greater Bendigo.
The Study was developed in consultation with academics, industry experts and local
businesses. It was designed to gather primary qualitative and quantitative data by
directly engaging with the key players - that is businesses that generate freight (freight
generators) and businesses that provide freight services (freight operators). This
involved over 80, 1-on-1 interviews with company owners, senior executives and freight/
logistics staff and 252 on-line surveys.
The Study recommendations are based on this empirical evidence and sets out steps to
help make the freight network more efficient, safer, robust and responsive to innovation
and change. The recommendations also provide guidance on how to improve the
sustainability of the freight sector now and into the future and make the city safer,
cleaner and more productive.
The Study has been on public display for a period of four weeks and seven submissions
have been received.
RECOMMENDATION

1. Endorse the Study findings and recommendations.
2. Endorse the preparation of an action plan to prioritise the recommendations and
facilitate implementation.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
PAGE 80
Policy Context
Council Plan Reference:
The Bendigo Freight Study was undertaken in line with Council Plan 2013-2017 Action
2.3.8 which required the city to: Complete the Greater Bendigo Freight Study in
collaboration with the State Government.
The Study recommendations align with the following Objectives of the Community Plan
2017-2021:
Objective 1.5 Take a leadership role in regional planning, advocacy and work in
partnership with regional councils
Objective 2.2 Promote positive wellbeing across the Greater Bendigo community
Objective 4.3 Continue to implement strategies that increase the capacity of transport
networks to better move people and goods and encourages walking, cycling and the use
of public transport
Strategy Reference:
Connecting Greater Bendigo: Integrated Transport & Land Use Strategy (ITLUS)
recommended that the Bendigo Freight Study be undertaken as a short-term priority
action.
The ITLUS also includes numerous actions that align with the Freight Study
recommendations, including but not limited to the following:
Improve designated freight route signage to ensure its legibility for heavy vehicle
operators.
Test the effectiveness of existing arrangements and the need for the introduction into
the Greater Bendigo Planning Scheme of any new land use and development planning
tools to protect designated freight routes from encroaching development, particularly in
areas designated for residential growth.
Upgrade the Howard Street and Midland Highway intersection to improve safety and
manoeuvrability.
Investigate options for improved north-western freight connections between Epsom and
Marong including potential enhancements along over - dimensional Route 18.
Explore the establishment of freight hubs on the periphery of urban Bendigo, as part of
the Bendigo Freight Study, to support the freight industry and to minimise the impact of
freight operations on the citys liveability with initial consideration being given to sites at
Big Hill and Marong Business Park.
PAGE 81
Regional Strategic Plan Reference:
The Study recommendations align with the Loddon Campaspe Integrated Transport
Strategy (2015) Goal S1.1. Develop and maintain an efficient freight network that is fit
for purpose and meets regional business needs through removing barriers; addressing
last mile needs and protecting networks.
Action S1.1.3 is identified as a top 10 priority and reads as follows: Undertake a regional
wide freight hub study to identify and protect possible potential future road and rail freight
hubs and access networks
Previous Council Decision Dates:
On 26 August 2015 Council adopted Connecting Greater Bendigo: Integrated Transport

& Land Use Strategy (ITLUS) which sets out undertaking the Bendigo Freight Study as a
short term priority action.
The international context
Every day, the food we eat, the clothes we wear, the materials we use to build our
homes and make products that are consumed locally and elsewhere, are transported to,
within and from Greater Bendigo.
The 'freight issue' cannot be separated from the Citys liveability, the local economy and
environmental sustainability. In simple terms, it comes down to people of Greater
Bendigo wanting to buy and produce goods; goods which need to be transported on the
Citys roads and, potentially, the railway network and by air. Everyone, in some way,
contributes towards the fast growing freight task, which in Australia, has quadrupled in
the last four decades.
The freight task is diverse, including raw materials, manufactured items, processed
goods, large loads and small parcels. It is expected that goods are delivered on demand
and without delay. The size of the freight task is not only determined by our growing
population: it is the result of people buying substantially more now than they did a
generation ago.
The current trend is well and truly in line with the projected forecasts of the freight task
doubling in size between 2010 and 2030. That means more trucks and vans on our
roads impacting on the Citys amenity, neighbourhood safety and the natural
environment.
For the business sector it means impacts on productivity caused by congestion and the
transport, communication and other infrastructure failing to keep pace with the growing
demand.
This challenge is not exclusive to Greater Bendigo. In Toronto, Canada, the freight
challenge has been described as follows (Moving the Economy 2004):
PAGE 82
"The overarching challenge is sheer diversity and complexity, eluding silver bullet
solutions and requiring thoughtful, whole systems thinking and some major collaborative
effort across just about every sector. While having been traditionally left to market forces
and the private sector alone to make it work there is an emerging realization of a very
important public sector role for supporting coordinated, efficient, sustainable urban goods
movement in Canadian cities.
Although extremely complex, the freight issue needs to be addressed because of:
The impacts associated with the current culture of hyper-consumerism;
The need to support local businesses that are struggling to remain competitive in a
globalised economy; and
The need to mitigate the effects of climate change, which not only have
environmental implications, but which can hinder or halt the movement of freight by
compromising critical infrastructure.
The regional context
The movement of freight extends well beyond municipal boundaries. Regional, interstate
and international factors are at play. However, a 2016 AusRoads report found that there
is a chronic lack of data and fundamental knowledge about how the [freight] system
works in Australia and New Zealand; and that The lack of research means that there is
no accepted body of knowledge to help policy makers decide how best to tackle freight
issues.
The Bendigo Freight Study was designed to gather primary quantitative and qualitative
data to provide evidence that can assist policy, new investment and infrastructure
maintenance decisions. The Study provides a fine grain analysis of the freight system at
a municipal level, with the capacity to inform regional policy responses. It positions
Bendigo at the forefront of informed network planning and strategic investment.
The local context
The key issue that generated negative press and heated public debate during the
development of the Connecting Greater Bendigo: Integrated Transport & Land Use
Strategy (ITLUS) was the issue of freight; i.e. trucks having an impact on residential
amenity. ITLUS tackled this debate by engaging with both the residential and business
community. The scope of the project however, did not allow for a thorough empirical
analysis of the issues and opportunities at hand. As such the ITLUS recommended a
detailed study to be pursued as a short-term priority.
There are emerging resident and business community objectives that are likely to have
an impact on the way freight moves within Greater Bendigo and the region which include:
Desire to improve the safety and amenity of walking, cycling and public transport
within Bendigo CBD and to minimise the impact of freight movement on the
residential areas.
Desire to improve the freight and logistic sectors productivity and to maximise
investment opportunities.
Desire to strengthen the economy and to create jobs.
Increasing use of technology to assist in moving freight more efficiently and
sustainably.
PAGE 83
Councils strategic and operational response to the Study findings is therefore highly
anticipated by the relevant stakeholders, namely:
The local community who voiced their concerns in response to the Draft Bendigo
Transport Strategy and during the ITLUS consultation process, about the impact of
the expanding freight task on residential amenity.
Leading businesses in the freight and logistics sector that were involved in the ITLUS
process and advocated for the Freight Study to be undertaken.
Transport and land use government departments and agencies responsible for timely
and evidence based planning and infrastructure investment.
Report
The Bendigo Freight Study Final Draft Report (https://arcg.is/nuHWm) is a culmination of

work undertaken to address gaps in our understanding of the Greater Bendigo freight
task and associated productivity and amenity issues. The Draft Report details the
process and result of quantitative and qualitative research designed to assist Council
make evidence based policy, new investment and infrastructure maintenance decisions.
Completion of the Bendigo Freight Study places the City in a unique position to plan for
and undertake actions that deliver positive benefits for the economy, the environment
and the community as the Study is believed to be the first of its kind in Australia. It sets a
benchmark for an evidence based response to the freight issue.
Study methodology
The current fiscal environment demands empirically sound evidence to guide

government investment and policy decisions. To that effect, the Bendigo Freight Study
methodology was developed in collaboration with prominent academics, independent
experts and local businesses. It centres on engagement with the key players that is
businesses that generate freight (freight generators) and businesses that provide freight
services (freight operators).
The Study findings arise from the following research activities:

Desktop analysis to identify best practice and trends in the transport and logistics
sector.
Site visits to four freight related facilities to explore 'fit for purpose' solutions for
Greater Bendigo that address industry needs and the needs of the City's growing
population over time.
Heavy vehicle driver interviews to learn about freight that is moved through Marong
and the driver experience of moving freight in Greater Bendigo more generally.
Heavy vehicle counts at three locations with access to regional and interstate routes,
namely: Marong, Heathcote and Huntly (near the Bendigo Livestock Exchange).
Truck tours of the Greater Bendigo routes involving senior City and VicRoads staff
responsible for strategic planning and infrastructure decisions.
Geo-mapping, on-line surveys designed to engage with the respondents in an
innovative way; and to collect and analyse large volumes of data.
1-on1 interviews with all of the freight operators that took part in the Study and freight
generators known to have complex operations and which generate significant freight
movements.
PAGE 84
An industry Roundtable Session which helped verify the Study findings with
representatives of the local freight operators and freight generators, senior City and
VicRoads staff and CoGB Councillors.
Latest information technology was used to gather, analyse and share/communicate the
Study findings. This includes:
A geo-mapping electronic survey instrument which produces base data ready to be
cross-tabulated against other data sets and across a variety of platforms thus offering
unprecedented depth and breadth of analysis opportunities.
Go-Pro dash-board video camera was used to capture real life images of what heavy
vehicle drivers encounter on Greater Bendigos road network.
The Final Draft Report is presented in an innovative on-line format which allows for
complex data and large volumes of information to be viewed in a graphic format; is
fully interactive, allowing the reader to choose the level of detail they wish to explore.
Ultimately, the Study aims to harness the power of new technology for on-the-
ground efficiency and amenity improvements, such as using sensors and mobile
based devices to improve loading bay access and management in the CBD.
The research work outlined above establishes a sound basis for ongoing collaboration
with the business sector and puts Greater Bendigo at the forefront of informed network
planning and strategic investment.
Key Study findings and associated recommendations
The Studys Final Draft Report outlines what is carried into and out of Greater Bendigo;
how and when it is carried; and along which routes it is carried. The Draft Report offers a
'real life' insight into which routes are being used to carry what types of vehicles and why
these routes are chosen by the Freight Operators.
The 252 businesses that took part in the Study alone account for 172,468 freight vehicle
movements per month across Greater Bendigo. Of the businesses involved 44 were
freight operators, representing 32 percent of companies with business sites in Greater
Bendigo (a total of 138). This large industry sample represents a wide spectrum of
'business types', that is the types of freight they specialise in carrying - from 'sensitive
freight' through to livestock, agricultural product, general freight and waste; as well as the
scale of their operations - sole operators, to companies that employ upwards of 100 staff.
The 208 freight generator responses provide a unique insight into the freight task of
Greater Bendigo companies across all sectors, including: processing and manufacturing,
hospitality, agricultural sector, education, professional services, health, mining,
warehousing, wholesale and retail.
The ITLUS referred to anecdotal evidence of Bendigo being an active hub of freight
activity. The freight operator responses confirmed that freight is being aggregated and
disaggregated in Bendigo. The survey results also indicate that there is a volume of
freight that is on-forwarded via Bendigo (54% of surveyed freight operators on-forward
freight). This means that freight is moved through Bendigo which originates and is
destined for locations outside of the municipality.
Interestingly, there are two groupings or clusters of freight operators within urban
Bendigo that undertake both of these activities (in Golden Gully and East Bendigo).
PAGE 85
Some of the East Bendigo operators stated that their business location does not meet
their current operational needs - "site is too small" was noted as the most common
reason for their dissatisfaction with their current business location. 86% of these
businesses would be looking to relocate to a site within Bendigo. Reference was made
by a number of freight operators to the proposed Marong Business Park as a site of
interest for future activities.
The Study identifies a number of last kilometre, site specific and city wide issues and
opportunities; and explores various improvements that would make freight operations
more productive and/or efficient for the Study respondents. These inform the Study
recommendations which are grouped under four themes: Evidence, Integrated
Planning, Collaboration, Innovation and are outlined in the table below.
THEME 1 - EVIDENCE
Key finding Recommendation
Poor intersection design and insufficient 1.1 Secure an 'infrastructure
road width were found to be the most improvement pipeline: seek funding to
common efficiency inhibitors and safety tackle identified site specific issues in a
issues, particularly in urban Bendigo. timely manner.
They require a network wide solution. Sailors Gully/Bendigo-Pyramid Road
intersection,
Eaglehawk North;
Howard Street/Midland Hwy
intersection, Epsom;
Hattam/Allingham Street intersection,
Golden Square
to be treated as highest priority.
LISTED AS HIGH PRIORITY

The designated road network connecting 1.2 Improve north-west
Midland Hwy, north of Epsom, with connections: Investigate options for a
Marong, particularly through Epsom and protected freight corridor between
Eaglehawk is a major efficiency inhibitor Marong and Epsom, including alternative
and poses serious safety issues. Poor connections to the Bendigo Livestock
flow of movement along the route Exchange, to improve freight efficiency
impacts on fuel consumption, wear and and enhance the safety and amenity of
tear, noise and air pollution. residential areas.
LISTED AS HIGH PRIORITY

Poor freight route signage, particularly 1.3 Improve freight route signage: work
for B-doubles contributes to drivers with VicRoads to review the signage
getting lost, accessing restricted areas design and placement policy.
and results in longer journey times. Signs
are poorly positioned and key
connections are not sufficiently signed.
Due to lack of designated facilities, 1.4 Provide secure heavy vehicle parking
informal trailer exchanges and heavy and trailer exchange/storage
PAGE 86
THEME 1 - EVIDENCE
vehicle parking/storage occurs across facilities: identify best locations, including
urban Bendigo including in residential urban Bendigo, and undertake a
areas and along main roads. Often, there progressive roll-out of these facilities.
is insufficient space to safely
accommodate large vehicles; there is no LISTED AS HIGH PRIORITY
'load security'; and this activity impacts
on amenity and safety.
The Study identified connectivity 1.5 Address gaps in the B-double
limitations in the designated B-double accessible network: Examine options for
route network. Freight Operators access improving network continuity for B-
B-double restricted areas in order to doubles. Consider inclusion of Strickland
reach their destinations in a timely Road (between Nolan St and Murphy St)
manner and choose road connections as a priority.
that are easiest to manoeuvre.
THEME 2 INTEGRATED PLANNING

ITLUS integrates the City's policy and 2.1 Implement ITLUS: continue
activities relating to land use and progressive implementation of
transport, including the movement of recommendations relating to the freight
freight, in one overarching, strategic task.
document. The Bendigo Freight Study
has confirmed ITLUS recommendations
as empirically sound
Australian Standing Council on Transport 2.2 Protect freight routes from
and Infrastructure has identified long encroaching development: Develop a city
term precinct and corridor protection as wide freight corridor and precinct plan to
one of the most significant issues take Greater Bendigo and its growing
requiring government's urgent attention. freight task into the future.
This need has been confirmed by the
Study participants who saw protection of LISTED AS HIGH PRIORITY
freight routes from encroaching
development as a key improvement that
would make their operations more
productive and/or efficient.
The Study results suggest that there is 2.3 Consider a freight terminal, 'freight
demand for facilities that address: driver hub' or freight cluster/consolidation
fatigue/lack of rest stops in urban centre solution: Investigate the costs,
Bendigo; secure vehicle parking/trailer benefits and potential locations of 'fit for
exchange; and grouping of like and purpose' solutions for Greater Bendigo
ancillary businesses and facilities in that address industry needs and the
strategically positioned location. 'Freight needs of the City's growing population
terminals', 'freight hubs' and 'freight over time.
clusters/consolidation centres' can serve
PAGE 87
THEME 2 INTEGRATED PLANNING

all or some of this demand.
THEME 3- COLLABORATION
The Study engagement process was met 3.1. Build on expressed interest in joining
with great enthusiasm from the business a collaborative group: Discuss details of
community. A number of them expressed such group's purpose and make up in
an interest in being involved in a consultation with the business sector and
collaborative group if one was to be set other relevant stakeholders.
up in the future.
Such a group could provide informed
advice as a 'strategic think tank' or a
'reference group' on specific freight
related projects; it could help pilot
innovative solutions and test new
technology; or it could identify
opportunities to attract and retain skilled
workforce that meets the needs of the
changing freight and logistics sector.
There appears to be a disconnect 3.2 Lift industry profile: work with the
between the community's growing industry to shift public perception of the
demand for consumables and freight sector towards one which is seen
understanding of the freight task that is as serving the local community, making a
required to meet this demand. The significant contribution to the economy
freight sector suffers from poor industry and which seeks to minimise negative
profile as a result of this, as well as the impacts.
result of past history of poor practice.
That has direct impact on growing driver
shortage and public's opposition to
freight vehicles accessing urban areas.
Road safety is the standout issue 3.3 Address road safety issues through
identified by the Study. Freight Operators education: Explore collaborative
were the most vocal advocates of giving solutions for an education campaign with
this issue urgent attention. They stressed freight industry, the government and
the need to tackle road safety associated responsible authorities.
with the movement of freight through
education as well as through LISTED AS HIGH PRIORITY
infrastructure improvements
Higher Mass Limit (HML) vehicles offer 3.4 Plan for growing demand for HML
efficiency improvements sought by vehicles: Work with industry when
Freight Generators which Freight considering HML vehicle access in a
Operators seek to accommodate. HML timely and balanced manner.
vehicles do however raise safety and
infrastructure investment issues. A
PAGE 88
THEME 3- COLLABORATION
balanced solution is needed to ensure
local business remains competitive and
the city's liveability is not seriously
compromised.
THEME 4 - INNOVATION
Recent years have seen unprecedented 4.1Trial the use of new technology to
technological advances, which will have provide flexibility and improved usage of
an impact on the movement of freight. loading zones: Pilot the use of, for
Several issues identified in the Study can example, 'smart sensors' and mobile
potentially be addressed with the use of based devices to ensure more efficient
new technology. and safe delivery of goods to the citys
The issue of loading zone availability and CBD.
accessibility, raised by both Freight
Operators and Freight Generators alike,
lends itself to applying new, innovative
solutions.
Standard mobile phone GPS takes 4.2 Explore opportunities to develop a
drivers on the most direct route, not 'travel options app' for Freight Operators:
necessarily a designated route. There this refers to a mobile phone application,
are a number of websites and mobile that combines available 'real time', road
phone applications designed to alert conditions and emergency information,
Freight Operators about the changing with location and availability of facilities,
conditions, but there is not one, easy to such as toilets and heavy vehicle
use source of 'real time' route and parking.
facilities information. The Study
participants identified a mobile phone
application as an efficiency and
productivity improvement. It would also
improve the quality of their working life.
Study participants identified 'waste' as a 4.3 Take action on commercial and
major issue, as well as an untapped industrial waste: explore innovative
economic opportunity. Freight solutions to reduce the amount of
Generators employ various solutions to organic and recyclable waste going to
deal with waste, for example, having landfill, reduce vehicle volumes and
contracts with local farmers to reduce the emissions associated with waste
amount of organic waste going to landfill. removal.
Due to enormity of the problem however,
they look to government to help address LISTED AS HIGH PRIORITY
it.
PAGE 89
Priority/Importance:
A safe, clean and efficient freight system is central to the future prosperity and liveability
of Greater Bendigo and the region. Stepping up activities relating to the following
recommendations should be afforded priority consideration:
1.1 Secure an 'infrastructure improvement pipeline

1.2 Improve north-west connections
1.4 Provide secure heavy vehicle parking and trailer exchange/storage facilities
2.2 Protect freight routes from encroaching development
2.3 Consider a freight terminal, 'freight hub' or freight cluster/consolidation centre
solution
3.3 Address road safety issues through education
3.4 Plan for growing demand for HML vehicles
4.1 Trial the use of new technology to provide flexibility and improved usage of
loading zones
4.3 Take action on commercial and industrial waste
Options/Alternatives:
Preliminary discussions are being held with a range of internal and external stakeholders
to explore various approaches and funding opportunities to address some of the
recommendations, including:
Responding to Recommendation 1.1 Secure an 'infrastructure improvement pipeline
by holding discussions and providing the results of the Study to VicRoads as
evidence needed to make a case for funding.
Responding to Recommendation 1.2 Improve north-west connections by liaising
with VicRoads and other relevant authorities on pending recommendations of the
Marong Township Structure Plan.
Responding to Recommendation 1.4 Provide secure heavy vehicle parking and
trailer exchange/storage facilities by planning to commence initial work to identify
potential locations.
Responding to Recommendation 2.2. Protect freight routes from encroaching
development by looking to capture the strategic objective of this recommendation in
the Municipal Strategic Statement as part of the upcoming CoGB Planning Scheme
Review.
Responding to Recommendation 2.3 Consider a freight terminal, 'freight hub' or
freight cluster/consolidation centre solution by securing State Government
Transport Investing in Regions funding to undertake a regional Study.
Responding to Recommendation 3.2 Lift industry profile by collaborating with the
National Heavy Vehicle Regulator (NHVR) to hold an industry forum in Greater
Bendigo.
Responding to Recommendation 3.3 Address road safety issues through education
by seeking funding under the Heavy Vehicle Safety Initiative 2017-2018 program.
Responding to Recommendation 3.4 Plan for growing demand for HML vehicles by
liaising with the NHVR to streamline some of the repeatedly renewed vehicle access
permits by considering some strategic routes for gazettal.
PAGE 90
Responding to Recommendation 4.1 Trial the use of new technology to provide

flexibility and improved usage of loading zones (a Smart City initiative), by piloting
the use of 'smart sensors' and mobile based devices that are currently being tested
on a number of CoGB parking facilities.
4.3 Take action on commercial and industrial waste by progressing the Citys Waste
Resource Management Strategy 2014-2019 through collaboration with the Loddon
Mallee Resource Recovery Group on their proposed Regional Organic Strategy and
Alternative Waste Technology Strategy.
Risk Analysis:
Council response to numerous freight related issues and opportunities outlined in the
Studys Final Draft Report has been anticipated since the heated public debate that
ensued upon the release of the now superseded (by ITLUS) Draft Bendigo Road
Transport Strategy (2011). Failure to commit resources in the immediate future to take
active steps to address them could be met with public dissatisfaction. Loss of
momentum, stakeholder networks, specialist knowledge and skills built during the Study
development by internal staff could also have an adverse impact on implementation,
including missed opportunities for external funding.
The development of the Study methodology and the process of data gathering involved a
highly collaborative process and relied on intense stakeholder engagement. This
approach was also applied to seeking feedback on the Studys Final Draft Report.
It should be noted that the undertaking of the Freight Study has been met with a great
response and enthusiasm from the local Freight Operators and many larger Freight
Generators who saw it as their first opportunity to constructively advise Council on
matters relating to freight and associated issues and opportunities.
Internal Consultation:
Input from internal staff from the following Council departments was sought at various
stages of the Study development:
Parking
Engineering
Waste Services
Communications
Statutory Planning
Much of the work captured in the Study recommendations will need to be delivered by
these departments in collaboration with external bodies.
PAGE 91
External Consultation:
The Bendigo Freight Study findings are based on information gathered through
engagement with heavy vehicle drivers; 252 local businesses, including approximately
80 1-on-1 interviews; discussions with various government and business representatives
undertaken during site visits to four freight related facilities; and the input of technical and
industry experts.
In July 2017, an industry Roundtable Session was held to verify the emerging Study
findings with representatives of the local Freight Operators and Freight Generators,
senior Council and VicRoads staff and CoGB Councillors.
The Final Draft Report and associated Community Bulletin (Attachment 1) were
distributed to approximately 1,000 stakeholders including:
Businesses registered on Councils database.
Study participants.
ITLUS Final Draft submitters who voiced concerns about heavy vehicles impacting on
residential amenity.
Relevant government departments and agencies and industry associations.
Release of the Final Draft Report was advertised in the local print media and was
promoted on social media.
Overall, the Final Draft Report was well received.
A number of local businesses choose to provide verbal feedback via the phone.
A total of 7 written submissions were received. Their content and proposed response are
outlined in Summary of Submissions and Responses (Attachment 2).
Representatives of VicRoads, Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport

and Resources, and Regional Victoria were also consulted at various stages of the Study
development.
Advice was sought from leading researchers at La Trobe University, Melbourne

University, the National Transport Commission and the Australian Bureau of Statistics.
Organisations such as the National Heavy Vehicle Regulator, the Livestock & Rural
Transporters Association of Victoria Inc., and Bureau of Infrastructure, Transport and
Regional Economics have expressed a keen interest in the Study and also provided
valuable input.
PAGE 92
The Study provides long awaited empirical evidence. The recommendations largely
confirm issues and opportunities voiced by both the citys residents and the business
community for many years. As such, some resource streams and implementation
mechanisms are already in place and some work is currently underway that responds to
the Study recommendations outlined in the Final Draft Report. The Study findings can
now be used to prioritise specific projects under the citys Capital Works Program and
Operational Budget.
A number of Study recommendations require new resourcing. Given the current

constrained fiscal environment these will need to be sought from external sources. The
Study now provides the evidence required by many State and Federal government
departments and agencies to support such funding bids. It is recommended that these
external funding opportunities be actively pursued to step up implementation of Study
recommendations while the data is current and valid. In the absence of a dedicated
Funding Grants Officer this work would largely need to be undertaken by the Regional
Sustainable Development (RSD) staff in collaboration with other relevant Council
departments.
A number of Study recommendations relate to activities and projects that are the
responsibility of other levels of government and agencies. It is recommended that
Council, with the RSD Unit taking the lead responsibility, advocate for these
recommendations to be pursued as improvements that have both local and regional
benefits.
$60,000
Previous Council Support:
Initial Study costs were funded by re-allocated monies in the 2016/17 Operational Budget
of the former Economic Development Unit.
External Funding Sources:
$25,000 has been provided by State Government under the Transport Investing in
Regions fund to undertake work that aligns with Recommendation 2.3. Consider a
freight terminal, 'freight hub' or freight cluster/consolidation centre solution: Investigate
the costs, benefits and potential locations of 'fit for purpose' solutions for Greater
Bendigo that address industry needs and the needs of the City's growing population over
time. Council agreed to match this contribution in kind, dollar for dollar. This work is due
to be completed by 30 June 2018.
The Bendigo Freight Study provides empirical evidence that can be used to make a
strong case in applying for a number of external funding sources, including Local Roads
to Market, Agriculture Victoria; and Heavy Vehicle Safety Initiative 2017-2018, National
Heavy Vehicle Regulator.
PAGE 93
Any known or anticipated variance to budget:
Noting that the implementation of Study recommendations requires a resource

commitment, an amount of $30,000 is required to deliver outcomes over and above the
existing budget.
Projected costs for future financial years:
Council will be provided with advice on projected costs over forward years, when
available.
Any ongoing recurrent expenditure required:
The Study involved piloting a new format, online analysis and reporting tool called
ArcGIS Online and ArcGIS Desktop (an ESRI product). It was chosen because VicRoads
and other government agencies and departments utilise ESRI based data storage and
analysis systems. This allows for easy big data transfer and cross tabulation. It was also
chosen because it enabled internal staff, rather than consultants, to undertake Study
data analysis and production of full report.
This tool requires an on-going annual license to the value of $2,277 (incl GST).
Attachments
1. Bendigo Freight Study Community Bulletin
2. Summary of Submissions and Responses
PAGE 94
Wellbeing and Fairness - Reports Ordinary Meeting - 15 November 2017
3. WELLBEING AND FAIRNESS
3.1 BENDIGO CLUB GAMING APPLICATION
Author Vicky Mason, Director Health and Wellbeing
Responsible Vicky Mason, Director Health and Wellbeing

Director
Summary / Purpose
The purpose of this report is to seek Council endorsement of a submission forwarded to

the Victorian Commission for Gambling and Liquor Regulation (VCGLR) on Friday 27
October 2017 opposing an application from the Bendigo Club to increase the number of
Electronic Gaming Machines (EGMs) at its venue from 44 to 60.
The report provides a review of the social and economic impact of the application and
finds that overall the impact on the local community and Greater Bendigo overall will be
negative.
RECOMMENDATION
That the Greater Bendigo City Council endorse the economic and social impact
submission lodged with the VCGLR on the 27 October 2017, advising the VCGLR that
the overall social and economic impact of the proposed application by the Bendigo Club
for an increase in the number of EGMS at the premises from 44 to 60 is detrimental and
therefore is not supported.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Policy Context
Local Government Act
The primary objective of a Council is to endeavour to achieve the best outcomes for the
local community having regard to the long term and cumulative effects of decisions.
Public Health and Wellbeing Act
Local government has a responsibility to protect, improve and promote public health and
wellbeing within their municipality.
PAGE 95
Community Plan 2017-2021 Reference:
Strategic Objectives:
Goal 2: Wellbeing and fairness
2.1 Create a much healthier Greater Bendigo
2.1.2 Update Councils Gaming Policy.
Greater Bendigo Health and Wellbeing Plan 2017- 2021
The goals within the Plan are focused on ensuring the Greater Bendigo community is:
Healthy and well
Safe and secure
Able to participate
Connected to culture and community
Liveable
This is achieved through actions to change policy, improve neighbourhoods and
environments, support community action and influence cultural and individual behaviour
change.
City of Greater Bendigo Gaming Policy
Adopted by Council on 5 December 2007, the Gaming Policy Framework Accessible

but Not Convenient (the Policy) was based on evidence that the best way to manage
EGMs is for them to be located in venues which are Accessible but not Convenient.
The Policy utilises the approach of destination gaming (where a conscious decision to
attend a gaming venue must be made) to reduce the negative impacts of gaming.
Given that gaming is recognised in legislation as a legitimate form of recreation, the

Policy aims to minimise the negative effects of gaming by acknowledging that some
Greater Bendigo communities are particularly vulnerable to the potential negative
impacts of gaming. It does not attempt to discourage gaming machines in areas that
genuinely have the capacity to accommodate them.
In summary, the Policy recommends that Council considers gaming venues as part of
the overall entertainment and recreation offer in Greater Bendigo, and inter alia takes
into account five decision guidelines for considering applications for new gaming
machines or new premises for gaming:
1. Whether there is a net community benefit to be derived from the application
2. Whether the proposal is likely to increase the social disadvantage of an area.
3. Whether the location of the gaming machines or gaming premises will facilitate or
discourage convenience gambling.
4. Whether the venue is accessible for a variety of transport modes.
5. Whether residents will have a choice of gaming and non-gaming recreation venues in
the local area.
PAGE 96
This Policy is also incorporated into the Greater Bendigo Planning Scheme through a
Local Planning Policy, which is applied to assessment of Planning Applications for
Electronic Gaming Machine venues and expansions.
An action identified in the Community Plan 2017 2021 is to update the current policy
position of Council with regard to gaming.
On 17 August 2017 Council was notified that the Bendigo Club submitted an application
to the VCGLR to increase the number of EGMs at their venue from 44 to 60.
The Bendigo Club is owned by the Kilmore Racing Club who took over the organisation
on 27 May 2016 following the club going into Administration.
Under the Gambling Regulation Act 2003 responsible authorities can make submissions
in respect of applications to the VCGLR for new premises applications or applications to
amendments to venue operators' licences i.e. to vary the number of gaming machines for
an approved venue.
Councils must advise the VCGLR of their intention to lodge an economic and social
impact submission within 37 days of being notified of an application to the VCGLR. It
must then lodge this submission within 60 days of being notified of this application to the
VCGLR. Consequently Council Officer sought advice from Councillors with regard to
preparing a submission. This was supported to be prepared internally. A final submission
was lodged with the VCGLR on the 27 October 2017.
Report
Council Officers have prepared a social and economic impact assessment of the
proposed increase in EGMs at the Bendigo Club that finds that the overall impact on the
wellbeing of the community of the City of Greater Bendigo and the local community
within which the proposal is located will likely to be negative.
The preparation of the social and economic impact assessment involved the following
tasks:
a. Review of relevant documentation accompanying the application:
City of Greater Bendigo Gaming Policy Framework Accessible but not
Convenient, October 2007, Coomes Consulting Group
Application to modify a gaming area in a machine approved venue.
Application to increase the number of EGMs at a venue
Social and Economic Assessment Urbis
Progressive Venue Services (PVS) Expenditure Report Michael Clyne
BT Murphy witness Statement
AE McMahon witness statement.
b. Review of relevant clauses of Greater Bendigo Planning Scheme
c. Review of relevant data sourced from the VCGLR, i.d consulting, Department of
Health and Human Services, and ABS Census of Population and Housing, 2011
PAGE 97
The findings of the assessment are summarised below with a full explanation in
Attachment 1:
Economic Benefits
The additional income stated is not clear with consultants suggesting from $0 -
$835,744.
The application suggests an increased contribution to the community of $8,000 if the

16 EGMs are granted.
The Bendigo Club proposes infrastructure investment of $477,750; however

$143,890 of the works is either currently under construction or being purchased. This
investment is considered to have a greater benefit for the applicant than the
community.
Economics Disbenefits
Additional expenditure created by the new EGMs will lead to increased harm from
gambling across the City
Diversion of trade from other gaming venues The PVS report suggests that
$835,000 additional funds will be lost in the venue with an 80% transfer rate. There is
little evidence that such a high transfer rate occurs in reality. Research indicates that
there are a number of examples where top-up applications appear to result in overall
increases in expenditure with no discernible transfer at all.
The submission states that the additional EGMs will reduce the level of tax to be paid
to the Government and suggests that this will not have an impact on the Greater
Bendigo community however significant funds for Greater Bendigo development
come from the State and Federal Governments.
Social Benefits
Improvements at the venue - Some of the improvements are already underway and
are clearly not dependent on the additional EGMs. There is also no evidence that the
other improvements are reliant on the additional EGMs being approved.
Increased gaming machines - There appears to be little demand for additional EGMs
given the low usage rates of the existing machines. It appears the main motivation is
the desire to avoid tax. Tax avoidance is never a community benefit.
Increase community contributions - The Bendigo Club is already increasing their

community contributions and there is no evidence that this would not occur anyway
Social Disbenefits
Increased incidence and impact of harm from gambling on the community - If as
reported in the application the new losses will be insignificant, concern must be raised
that problem gamblers could see the venue as a more attractive option as research
indicates that machine choice matters more to more frequent gamblers who are most
like to be experiencing harm.
PAGE 98
Community attitude Bendigo has above average EGM density and losses. Past
community surveys have clearly shown a negative community attitude to gaming in
the Municipality
Increased exposure of children to gambling activities the Bendigo Club promotes a

Kids Club. The City of Greater Bendigo is concerned about the exposure of children
to EGMs. The venue design allows children to see into the gaming room with the
glass wall not providing a sufficient barrier and a door that is unlikely to be
permanently closed.
This assessment was prepared with support from officers at the VLGA.
This assessment was prepared by Council Officers so no additional resources were

required.
Conclusion
On weighing up the benefits and disbenefits, as the responsible authority the City of
Greater Bendigo finds that the anticipated economic and social impact of the proposal on
the well-being of the community of the municipal district is likely to be detrimental.
Attachments
Bendigo Club Social and Economic Impact submission.
PAGE 99
Strengthening the Economy / Environmental Sustainability - Reports Ordinary Meeting - 15 November 2017
4. STRENGTHENING THE ECONOMY
Nil.
5. ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY
Nil.
PAGE 100
Embracing Our Culture and Heritage - Reports Ordinary Meeting - 15 November 2017
6. EMBRACING OUR CULTURE AND HERITAGE
6.1 2018 DUDLEY HOUSE COMMUNITY HIRE SUBSIDY AND

PERFORMANCE SUBSIDY - ROUND 1 OF 2
Author Rohan Phillips, Arts Officer

Director
Purpose
This report recommends that Council consider the first round of the 2018 Dudley House
Community Hire Subsidy and Performance Subsidy schedule for adoption.
Summary
The Dudley House Community Hire Subsidy and Performance Subsidy Program seek to
enable and support local artists and performers to present new work in venues managed
by Capital Venues and Events. A total of twelve subsidies are provided on an annual
basis, offered in two rounds. This report details the applications received in round one for
presentation of works commencing from January 2018. Round two will open for
application in June 2018.
RECOMMENDATION
That Greater Bendigo City Council resolves to adopt the assessment panels
recommendation to support three exhibitions as part of the Dudley House Community
Hire Subsidy, and three performances as part of the Performance Subsidy.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Policy Context
City of Greater Bendigo Community Plan 2017-2021:

Goal 6 Embracing our culture and heritage
Objective 6.3 Offer and support a diverse range of events that attract and
connect people.
PAGE 101
The Dudley House Community Hire Subsidy Grants Program was adopted by Council in
2002. The Performance Subsidy was established in 2010. Community proposals adhere
to the following guidelines:
Submissions are invited from artists, performers, community groups or individuals
residing, studying and/or working in the City of Greater Bendigo;
Community proposals that promote new and emerging work from a variety of art
forms are encouraged;
Assessment criteria focuses on the delivery of a diverse and integrated program,
together with the quality of the work.
Data and information gathered from the 2017 Subsidy Programs indicate that the
program supported 36 artists and 15 performers, and attracted over 2,000 audience
attendances.
Report
Applications opened on 7 September and closed on 2 October 2017. The program was
promoted in the GB News Update, on Facebook and in the Arts e-bulletin. By the closing
date, 4 applications had been received for the Dudley House Community Hire Subsidy
and 1 for the Performance Subsidy. The deadline for the Performance Subsidy was
extended until 16 October 2017, and an additional two applications were received.
The number of applications is lower than in previous years, which may be due to a
number of artists and community groups currently exploring funding opportunities
through the Regional Centre of Culture Program 2018.
The panel has recommended that Council adopts the following three exhibitions for
presentation under the 2018 Dudley House Community Hire Subsidy, Round 1:
Artist(s) Exhibition Title Overview
A contemporary investigation
around the impact on the Bendigo
Sarah Wallace-
landscape by human
Smith, Judith
construction. Drawing reference
Warnest, Elise Abutt
from the chafing lines between land
Lidgett & Lisa
use of the First Nations people,
Honeychurch
immigrants, pastoralists, the mining
industry and urban sprawl.
PAGE 102
Artist(s) Exhibition Title Overview
Portraits, landscapes, intense

colours, still life, movement,
Jeanette Carr, Eileen
abstract. This group of Bendigo
Tubb, Anne
based women have closely worked
Lucchesi, Jane Presence
together for two years and
Upton, Cindy Parker
have revealed their individuality
& Julie Coyle
through the expression of their
passion.
Julie Andrews, This body of work is inspired by a
Tacit knowledge:
Leonie Kelsall & need to explore the deeper intuitive
Shadows and
Noela Stratford currents that underpin an artists life
Reflections
Foreman and their need to make work.
As per the grant guidelines, the assessment panel's decision was based on the quality of
the applications and the success of the applicants in articulating the artistic rationale of
their proposed exhibition.
The unsuccessful applicant will be encouraged to meet with the Arts Officer to discuss
their application and will be encouraged to re-submit for the July-December round.
The panel recommended that the following three performances be supported by the
2018 Performance Subsidy, Round 1:
Performer(s) Performance Title Overview
Sarah-Jane Fawcett Max Pry, Private Set in Chicago during the prohibition
Eye era, the story follows Max Pry, a
detective who dreams of becoming
a famous Private Eye.
Orpheus Piano Trio Orpheus Piano Trio A program of piano trio music
in Concert featuring Ravel's piano trio.
Marist Brass Band Pathways' in Music Marist Brass will showcase all three
Inc. of their groups, demonstrating how
anyone, any age or ability can join a
community band.
Priority/Importance:
The subsidy programs provide and enable the community's art sector to present their
work in high quality and professionally managed venues. In addition, Capital Venues and
Events staff are able to support, encourage and assist artists and performers to present
their work in a nurturing and creative environment that showcases creativity and talent
that exists in Greater Bendigo.
PAGE 103
Timelines:
Exhibitions and performances supported in round one will commence after 1 January
and end by 30 June 2018.
All successful applicants are required to complete an acquittal within 28 days of the end
of their exhibition or performance.
Risk Analysis:
All exhibitions and performances presented in Capital Venues & Events venues are
subject to standard operational and OHS procedures.
Internal Consultation:
Performance Subsidy Applications are assessed by the Capital Venues and Events
Programming Group consisting of the Manager Capital Venues and Events, Venue and
Technical Operations Managers, Marketing Coordinator, Arts and Culture Coordinator
and the Arts Officer.
Dudley House Community Hire Subsidy Applications are assessed by Senior Curator of
the Bendigo Art Gallery, the Coordinator Arts and Culture and the Arts Officer.
External Consultation:
The program was promoted in the GB News Update, on Facebook and in the Arts e-
bulletin.
This program is funded from the current 2017/2018 budget. The value of the venue hire
at the community rate is $5,027.50. The program also provides technical, front of house
and marketing support to the value of $1,924.00 The total cost of this program in round
one is $6,951.50

$13,902
Previous Council Support:

Annual program adopted by Council in 2002
Any ongoing recurrent expenditure required:

Annual program
PAGE 104
6.2 FUNDING AND MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT FOR BENDIGO

HERITAGE ATTRACTIONS
Author Ben Devanny, Manager Business Services

Director
Purpose
To finalise a new four year Funding and Management Agreement for Bendigo Heritage
Attractions.
Summary
The funding and management agreement between the Council and Bendigo Heritage
Attractions expired on 30 June 2017. The four year term is sought to provide financial
stability for Bendigo Heritage Attractions while they continue to improve the tourism and
workshop elements of the business.
The new agreement will provide Bendigo Heritage Attractions with $600,000 in funding to
assist with operations in 2017/2018 and this amount will be indexed annually with CPI.
$450,000 will also be provided annually to assist with capital works and maintenance of
buildings.
A number of reporting requirements have been incorporated into the agreement to

ensure a close working relationship between both parties.
RECOMMENDATION
That Greater Bendigo City Council resolve to authorise the Chief Executive Officer to
sign a new four year funding agreement with Bendigo Heritage Attractions (1 July 2017
30 June 2021).
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Policy Context

Goal 6.1.2 Stimulate re-purposing of heritage buildings for contemporary use and
increased sustainability.
PAGE 105
Bendigo Heritage Attractions, in close consultation with the City of Greater Bendigo,
manages local tourism attractions including the Central Deborah Gold Mine, the Bendigo
Tramways and the Bendigo Chinese Joss House Temple. All of these sites are owned by
the City of Greater Bendigo, and Bendigo Heritage Attractions owns the local fleet of
trams.
The organisation was established as The Bendigo Trust in 1970 to operate the Central
Deborah Gold Mine, when the State Electricity Commission of Victoria closed the
Bendigo Tramlines in April 1972 and a section of track was retained to be used as a
tourist attraction which commenced in December 1972.
Since 1972 they have operated these sites as valuable tourist attractions and activated
and maintained valuable heritage buildings throughout Bendigo.
Report
The new agreement will provide Bendigo Heritage Attractions with $600,000 in funding to
assist with operations in 2017/2018, with the amount indexed annually by the determined
rate cap percentage for the following three years of the term. $450,000 will also be
provided annually to assist with capital works and maintenance of buildings.
A number of reporting requirements have also been incorporated into the agreement to
enable ongoing monitoring of the agreement and to ensure a close working arrangement
between both parties including:
Greater collaboration between both parties on the prioritisation of capital works;

Timeline for a plan to be developed to clean up materials on Gasworks site;
Regular meetings between Bendigo Heritage Attractions and key staff at CoGB;
Half yearly briefings to Council; and
Development of Asset management plans for
o Tram Infrastructure
o Tram Fleet
o All buildings.
The details in the new agreement have been negotiated by officers in both organisations
over a number of months.
Council has provided Bendigo Heritage Attractions (formally Bendigo Trust) with funding
to assist with operations and also maintenance of assets for a number of years. The
financial contribution is incorporated in the approved budget for 2017/2018.
The financial contribution for 2015/2016 was $610,000 for operations and $550,000 for
capital works.
PAGE 106
The financial contribution for 2016/2017 was $510,000 for operations and $500,000 for
capital works.
Attachments
1. Funding and Management Agreement
PAGE 107
Lead and Govern For All - Reports Ordinary Meeting - 15 November 2017
7. LEAD AND GOVERN FOR ALL
7.1 COUNCIL MEETING DATES 2017/2018 MAYORAL TERM
Author Jessica Clarke-Hong, Manager Governance
Responsible Kerryn Ellis, Director Corporate Performance

Director
Purpose
The purpose of this report is to put forward proposed Council Meeting dates for the
2017/18 Mayoral term.
Summary
It is proposed that the following Ordinary Council Meeting dates for December 2017 and
for 2018 (to 21 November 2018) be adopted.
RECOMMENDATION
That the Ordinary Meeting of Council dates for December 2016 and for 2017 (to 21
November 2018) as detailed in this report be confirmed and advertised.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Policy Context
Effective community engagement will guide well informed, responsive decision-making

and financially responsible resource allocations, which are transparent and accountable.
Report
It is proposed that the following Ordinary Council Meeting dates for December 2017 and
for 2018 (to 21 November 2018) be adopted. The dates are based on Council Meetings
being held on the third Wednesday of every month at 6.00pm at the Bendigo Town Hall
(except for the first meeting for 2018, which will be held on the fourth Wednesday of the
month - 24 January 2018) and the final meeting in December 2017 to be the second
Wednesday of the month to allow decisions to be implemented prior to Christmas.
The consistent monthly meeting day and time is considered by the 2016/2020 Council to
have a number of advantages:
PAGE 108
More certainty for the community and all other interested parties;
The opportunity to circulate meeting agendas to the community earlier;
Increased opportunities to meet with the community between formal Council
meetings.
2017
13 December
2018
24 January
21 February
21 March
18 April
16 May
20 June
18 July
15 August
19 September
17 October
21 November
Nil
Attachments
Nil
PAGE 109
7.2 COUNCIL AND COMMUNITY COMMITTEES FOR 2017/2018

Officer
Purpose
The purpose of this report is to appoint Councillors to various Council and community
committees for the 2017/2018 Mayoral Term.
RECOMMENDATION
That Council make appointments to committees as outlined in this report.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Policy Context
Involvement with committees provides Councillors with an opportunity for community

engagement. Advisory committees to Council also have the opportunity to provide input
into the strategic direction of the Council and guidance to staff working on Council
initiatives.
PAGE 110
Report
Council Representatives 2017/2018
Committee Councillor
Arts and Creative Industries Strategy Working Group Cr Fyffe

Cr Emond
Audit Committee Cr ORourke

Cr Flack
Bendigo Agricultural Show Society Cr Fyffe
Bendigo Airport Advisory Committee Cr ORourke

Cr Williams
Bendigo Art Gallery Board Cr Emond
Bendigo Chinese Association Museum Inc Cr Emond
Bendigo Easter Festival Reference Group Cr Fyffe

Cr Hoskin
Bendigo Inventor Awards Cr Wrigglesworth
Bendigo Livestock Exchange Cr Williams
Bendigo Maubisse Friendship Committee Cr Alden
Bendigo Manufacturing Group Cr Emond
Bendigo Regional Archive Centre Cr Fyffe
Bendigo Stadium Board Limited Cr Williams
Bendigo Tourism Board Incorporated Cr Wrigglesworth
Bendigo Trust (Bendigo Heritage Attractions) Cr Hoskin
Calder Highway Improvement Committee Cr Williams
Central Victorian Greenhouse Alliance Cr Alden
Disability Inclusion Reference Group Cr ORourke

Cr Flack
Farming Advisory Committee Cr ORourke

Cr Emond
Cr Metcalf
Finance Committee All
PAGE 111
Greater Bendigo Cultural Diversity and Inclusion Plan Cr ORourke

Community Reference Group
Cr Alden
Cr Fyffe
Goldfields Library Corporation Board Cr Fyffe
Heritage Advisory Committee Cr Emond
ITLUS Community Reference Group Cr ORourke (Chair)

Cr Wrigglesworth
Cr Fyffe
Cr Metcalf
La Trobe University Bendigo Athletics Complex Committee Cr Flack
Lake Eppalock Land and On Water Management Plan Cr Wrigglesworth

Implementation Working Group
Loddon Mallee Waste and Resource Recovery Forum Cr Metcalf
Municipal Association of Victoria MAV Cr Fyffe

Cr Emond (Deputy)
Municipal Emergency Management Planning Committee Cr Flack
Municipal Fire Management Committee Cr Flack
Napier Street Upgrade Community Consultation Group Cr Williams
Plan Greater Bendigo Steering Committee Cr ORourke
Positive Ageing Advisory Committee Cr Hoskin

Cr Flack
Epsom Ascot Huntly Structural Flood Mitigation Advisory Cr ORourke

Group
Cr Williams
Cr Metcalf
Rosalind Park Recreation Reserve Precinct Advisory Cr Emond (Chair)

Committee
Cr Metcalf
Sustainability and Environment Advisory Committee Cr ORourke

Cr Alden
Cr Metcalf
Workspace Australia Board Cr Emond
PAGE 112
7.3 APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT MEMBER OF THE AUDIT

COMMITTEE
Author Jenny Watt, Executive Assistant
Responsible Craig Niemann, Chief Executive Officer

Officer
Purpose
To recommend the appointment of an Independent Member of the Audit Committee.
Summary
The Audit Committee Charter states that the Audit Committee will consist of five
members comprised of three suitably qualified independent representatives and two
Councillors. The appointment of independent representatives shall be made by Council
and be for a term of three years.
Following the interview process, members of the interview panel recommends that
Council appoint Mr Graham Bastian as an independent member of the Audit Committee
for a three year term concluding on 1 October 2020.
RECOMMENDATION
That the Greater Bendigo City Council:
1. Appoint Mr Graham Bastian to the City of Greater Bendigo Audit Committee for a
term of three years to 1 October 2020.
2. Thank the applicants for their willingness to nominate for the position.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Policy Context
Lead and Govern for all - be accountable and efficient in its use of the community's
money.

Goal 1 Lead and Govern for All
PAGE 113
Objective 1.4 Be accountable and efficient in its use of the community's money.
The Audit Committee Charter states that the Audit Committee will consist of five
members comprised of three suitably qualified independent representatives and two
Councillors. The appointment of independent representatives shall be made by Council
and be for a term of three years.
Clause 7 of the Internal Audit Charter states that "all reappointments following each
independent member's second term must be publicly advertised".
Mr Graham Bastian's second term on the Audit Committee concludes on 1 October

2017. This appointment is to fill the vacant position.
Report
Mr Bastian was appointed as an independent member of the Audit Committee on 1

October 2011 and was reappointed for a second term which expires on 1 October, 2017.
Mr Bastian has made an outstanding contribution to the Audit Committee serving as a
Committee member for six years.
In accordance with the Audit Committee Charter, the vacant position was advertised on
Saturday 30 September 2017.
Three applications were received for the position. Interviews were conducted by Mr Ken
Belfrage, Chair of the Audit Committee; Cr Margaret O'Rourke, Mayor and Mr Craig
Niemann, Chief Executive Officer.
While applicants had relevant experience, members of the interview panel recommend
the reappointment of Mr Graham Bastian as the independent member of the Audit
Committee.
Expenditure for the Audit Committee will be within budget.
PAGE 114
7.4 RECORD OF ASSEMBLIES

Director
Purpose
The purpose of this report is to provide the record of any assembly of Councillors, which
has been held since the last Council Meeting, so that it can be recorded in the Minutes of
the formal Council Meeting.
RECOMMENDATION
That Council endorse the record of assemblies of Councillors as outlined in this report.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Policy Context

Goal 1 Effective community engagement will guide well informed,
responsive decision-making and financially responsible resource
allocations, which are transparent and accountable.
A meeting will be an assembly of Councillors if it considers matters that are likely to be

the subject of a Council decision, or, the exercise of a Council delegation and the
meeting is:
1. A planned or scheduled meeting that includes at least half the Councillors (5) and a
member of Council staff; or
2. an advisory committee of the Council where one or more Councillors are present.
The requirement for reporting provides increased transparency and the opportunity for
Councillors to check the record, particularly the declarations of conflict of interest.
PAGE 115
Report
Meeting Information
Meeting Councillors' Briefing
Name/Type
Meeting Date 25 September 2017
Matters discussed 1. Conflict of Interest Workshop
2. Aged Care Reform
Attendees/Apologies
Councillors Cr Margaret O'Rourke
Cr Rod Fyffe
Cr Andrea Metcalf
Cr Jennifer Alden
Cr Julie Hoskin
Cr Matt Emond
Cr Yvonne Wrigglesworth
Apologies:
Cr George Flack
Cr James Williams
Staff/ Ms Kerryn Ellis
Community Ms Vicky Mason
Representatives Ms Jessica Clarke-Hong
Mr Peter Hargreaves
Apology:
Mr Craig Niemann
Conflict of Interest disclosures

Matter Councillor/officer making disclosure Councillor/officer left
No. meeting
Nil
PAGE 116
Meeting Information
Name/Type
Meeting Date 2 October 2017
Matters discussed 1. Community Grants Round 1 and Community Grants
Analysis
2. Audit Committee Chair presentation
3. Plan Bendigo
4. Health and Wellbeing Plan
5. Naming of Greater Bendigo Indoor Aquatic and Wellbeing
Centre
6. Councillor Request 'App' refresher
7. Mayor Election Process
8. Draft Public Toilet Strategy
9. Potential motions for MAV State Council - October 2017
10. Presentation of Annual Report
11. Bushfire Management Overlay
Attendees/Apologies
Cr Jennifer Alden
Cr Julie Hoskin
Cr Andrea Metcalf
Cr James Williams
Apologies:
Cr Matt Emond
Cr George Flack
Cr Rod Fyffe
Staff/ Ms Kerryn Ellis
Community Mr Craig Lloyd
Representatives Mr Bernie O'Sullivan
Ms Vicky Mason
Mr Michael Smyth
Ms Jessica Clarke-Hong
Mr Peter Hargreaves
Apology:
Mr Craig Niemann

No. meeting
Nil
PAGE 117
Meeting Information
Name/Type
Matters discussed 1. Potential partnership CoGB and Catholic College
2. Planning matters and draft Ordinary Agenda review
3. Naming of Kangaroo Flat Indoor Aquatic and Wellbeing
Facility
4. Memorial proposal for Daryl McClure
5. Service Review Program
6. Election of Mayor
7. Bendigo Stadium Annual Report
8. Tour of Bendigo Law Courts
Attendees/Apologies
Cr Andrea Metcalf
Cr Jennifer Alden
Cr Julie Hoskin
Cr Matt Emond
Cr James Williams
Cr George Flack
Apology:
Cr Rod Fyffe
Staff/ Mr Craig Niemann
Community Mr Bernie O'Sullivan
Representatives Mr Craig Lloyd
Mr Michael Smyth
Mr Lincoln Fitzgerald
Mr Peter Hargreaves
Apologies:
Ms Vicky Mason
Ms Kerryn Ellis

No. meeting
Nil
PAGE 118
Meeting Information
Name/Type
Matters discussed 1. Christmas decorations
2. Bloom 18 Festival
3. White Knight
4. Budget prioritisation
5. MAV State Council Meeting
6. Update on Rosalind Park Precinct Master Plan and
Hospital Precinct Structure Plan
7. Coliban Urban Water Strategy
8. Presentation by Cooperation Research Centre for
Water Sensitive Cities
9. Greater Bendigo Indoor Aquatic and Wellbeing Centre
10. Marong Gas 'daughter' station
11. Preliminary Election of Mayor and Deputy Mayor
Attendees/Apologies
Cr Jennifer Alden
Cr Matt Emond
Cr George Flack
Cr Rod Fyffe
Cr Julie Hoskin
Cr Andrea Metcalf
Cr James Williams
Community Mr Bernie O'Sullivan
Representatives Mr Craig Lloyd
Ms Kerryn Ellis
Ms Vicky Mason
Mr Peter Hargreaves

No. meeting
Nil
PAGE 119
Meeting Information
Meeting Consultation meeting
Name/Type
Matters discussed Planning application DR/481/2017
5 Hakea Road, HUNTLY 3551
Use and development of land for two dwellings
Attendees/Apologies
Councillors Cr James Williams
Cr Julie Hoskin
Staff/ Beth Lavery
Community Applicant
Representatives Objectors

No. meeting
Nil
PAGE 120
Meeting Information
Name/Type
Matters discussed 1. Council and Community Committees
2. Draft Election Priorities document
3. Marong Gas 'daughter' station
Attendees/Apologies
Cr Jennifer Alden
Cr Matt Emond
Cr Rod Fyffe
Cr Julie Hoskin
Cr Andrea Metcalf
Cr James Williams
Apology:
Cr George Flack
Community Ms Kerryn Ellis
Representatives Ms Jessica Clarke-Hong
Mr Peter Hargreaves

No. meeting
Nil
PAGE 121
7.5 CONTRACTS AWARDED UNDER DELEGATION
Author Lee Taig, Contract Support Administrator, Governance Unit

Director
Purpose/Summary
The purpose of this report is to provide information on contracts recently awarded under
delegation.
RECOMMENDATION
That the contracts awarded under delegation, as outlined in this report, be acknowledged
by Council.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Policy Context
Delivery of programs, projects and services that respond to community needs.
City of Greater Bendigo Community Plan 2017-2021
Goal 1: Lead and govern for all
Objective: 1:2 Be innovative and financially responsible
PAGE 122
Report
Capital Contracts
Contract Value Delegated

Project Successful Contractor Date Signed
No (GST Exc) Officer
Strathdale Park
CT000350 Netball/Tennis Court Avard Civil Pty Ltd 05 October
$362,413.00 Vicky Mason
Resurfacing and 2017
Lighting
Service Contracts
Value Delegated
Contract No Project Successful Contractor Date Signed
(GST Exc) Officer
Provision and
Maintenance Cleaning
Electrical Resource Schedule of 28 August
Services for Gutters Craig Lloyd
CT000342 Providers Pty Ltd Rates 2017
(Spouting) of Selected
Council Buildings
Current annual Council Budget for the goods/services contracted via this schedule of rates is
$90,000.00
Provision of Fire Hazard Schedule of 8 September
CT Rural Services Vicky Mason
Removal Rates 2017
CT000345
Current Annual Council Budget for the good/services contracted via this Schedule of Rates is
$40,000.00
PAGE 123
8. URGENT BUSINESS
Nil.
9. NOTICES OF MOTION
Nil.
10. COUNCILLORS' REPORTS
11. MAYOR'S REPORT
12. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S REPORT
13. CONFIDENTIAL (SECTION 89) REPORTS
13.1 Confidential Report in accordance with Section 89(2)(d) of the Local

Government Act relating to a contractual matter
RECOMMENDATION
That Council close the meeting to members of the public pursuant to Section 89(2)(d) of
the Local Government Act 1989 to consider a report relating to a contractual matter.
PAGE 124

Ordinary Agenda 15 November 2017

Transféré par

Informations du document

Titre original

Copyright

Formats disponibles

Partager ce document

Partager ou intégrer le document

Options de partage

Avez-vous trouvé ce document utile ?

Ce contenu est-il inapproprié ?

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

Ordinary Agenda 15 November 2017

Transféré par

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

AGENDA

Ordinary Meeting of Council

6.00pm Wednesday 15 November 2017

*** Broadcast live on Phoenix FM 106.7 ***

Copies of the City of Greater Bendigo Councils Agendas & Minutes

Greater Bendigo - creating the wold's most liveable community.

Presentation and Managing Growth

WEDNESDAY 15 NOVEMBER 2017

ITEM PRECIS PAGE

SUSPENSION OF STANDING ORDERS 5

PUBLIC QUESTION TIME 5

RESUMPTION OF STANDING ORDERS 6

DECLARATIONS OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST 7

1. PETITIONS AND JOINT LETTERS 9

1.1 Response to Petition Parking Girton College and Sacred 9

2. PRESENTATION AND MANAGING GROWTH 13

2.1 Planning Scheme Amendment C220 & Development Plan 13

2.2 Planning Scheme Amendment C223 - White Hills and East 29

2.3 Planning Scheme Amendment C221 - Bendigo Urban 41

2.5 Bendigo Freight Study 80

3. WELLBEING AND FAIRNESS 95

4. STRENGTHENING THE ECONOMY 100

5. ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY 100

6. EMBRACING OUR CULTURE AND HERITAGE 101

6.1 2018 Dudley House Community Hire Subsidy and 101

6.2 Funding and Management Agreement for Bendigo 105

7. LEAD AND GOVERN FOR ALL 108

7.1 Council Meeting Dates 2017/2018 Mayoral Term 108

7.2 Council and Community Committees for 2017/2018 110

7.3 Appointment of Independent Member of the Audit 113

7.4 Record of Assemblies 115

7.5 Contracts Awarded Under Delegation 122

8. URGENT BUSINESS 124

9. NOTICES OF MOTION 124

10. COUNCILLORS' REPORTS 124

11. MAYOR'S REPORT 124

12. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S REPORT 124

13. CONFIDENTIAL (SECTION 89) REPORTS 124

13.1 Confidential Report in accordance with Section 89(2)(d) of 124

SUSPENSION OF STANDING ORDERS

PUBLIC QUESTION TIME

Public Question Time Purpose

Public Question Time Where, When And Who

Residents are encouraged to lodge questions in advance so that a more complete

RESUMPTION OF STANDING ORDERS

That Standing Orders be resumed.

DECLARATIONS OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST

(a) direct financial interest

Councillors are also encouraged to declare circumstances where there may be a

Minutes of the Ordinary Meeting of Wednesday 18 October 2017.

City of Greater Bendigo Annual Report 2016/2017

1. PETITIONS AND JOINT LETTERS

1.1 RESPONSE TO PETITION PARKING GIRTON COLLEGE AND

Author Caroline Grylls, Manager Safe & Healthy Environments

Responsible Vicky Mason, Director Health and Wellbeing

The Safe and Healthy Environments department is currently undertaking a service

1. Acknowledge that a review of the Residential Parking Policy will be undertaken

Community Plan Reference:

City of Greater Bendigo Community Plan 2017-2021

Goal 1: Lead and Govern for all

Objective 1.1 Engage with all communities

Goal 3: Strengthening the economy

Residential Parking Policy

* Broadcast live on Phoenix FM 106.7 *