Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Facts:
Beatriz Nera filed an action before a lower court to admit
probate of the will. A question of fact of whether one of the
subscribing witnesses was present in the small room where
the will was executed at the time when the testator and the
other subscribing witnesses attached their signatures; or of
whether at that time he was outside, some eight or ten feet
away, in a large room connecting with the smaller room by a
doorway, across which was hung a curtain which made it
impossible for one in the outside room to see the testator and
the other subscribing witnesses in the act of attaching their
signatures to the instrument was not determined by the trial
court.
But the trial court admitted probate relying on the doctrine laid
down in Jaboneta v. Gustilo (5 Phil. Rep., 541) that the fact
that one of the subscribing witnesses was in the outer room
when the testator and the other describing witnesses signed
the instrument in the inner room, had it been proven, would
not be sufficient in itself to invalidate the execution of the will.
Hence, the present petition.
Issue:
Whether or not there is due execution of the will when one of
the subscribing witness is proven to be in the outer room at
the time when the testator and the other subscribing
witnesses attached their signatures to the will in the inner
room. [NO. The attaching of signatures is not done in the presence of
the witness in the outer room]
Ruling:
Lower Court Decision Appealed from is Affirmed.
In the case just cited, on which the trial court relied, we held
that:
***