When a development needs amendments to the Official Plan Section 3.1.

4 , Zoning By-
law 2008-250 and
to the Montreal District Secondary Plan it is not appropriate for the site PERIOD.

The First issue I wish to present relates to Noise Level.

I found it interesting that the planning department decided that the noise levels were
satisfactory when
the sites Traffic Noise Assessment clearly states Purchasers are advised that despite
the inclusion of
noise control features in the development and within the building units, sound levels due
to increasing
roadway traffic may, on occasion, interfere with some activities of the facility occupants
as the sound
levels exceed the sound level limits of the City and the Ministry of the Environment and
Climate Change. "

As Montreal Rd is an emergency vehicle corridor, (Paramedic Station and Hospital

located on it) I found it
ODD there is no mention of EMERGENCY vehicle NOISE (Siren's) This is a concern
for me as their sirens are
between 90-120 DB and the report only indicates that noise levels will range between
34 and 67 dBA during the
daytime period(07:00-23:00) and between 27 and 59 dBA during the nighttime period
(23:00-07:00).

In comparison the 102 Bill Leathem Drive site report indicates that noise levels due to
roadway traffic
over the site will range between 60 and 68 dBA during the daytime period (07:00-23:00)
and between 53 and 60 dBA
during the nighttime period (23:00-07:00)
 As both of these reports were furnished by the same firm, Gradient Wind Engineering
Inc.and their daytime and
nighttime max values are virtually identical, for the health and safety of clients and those
involved I recommend
the City of Ottawa prohibit the following uses at this location:
daycare
rooming unit and rooming house
residential care facility
shelter

My Second issue is the city has decided to refuse my request for an Archeological
Assesment 1

https://ottawa.ca/en/city-hall/planning-and-development/official-plan-and-master-
plans/official-plan/volume-1-official/section-1-introduction

1.1 - The Role of the Official Plan

D. the conservation of features of significant architectural, cultural, historical,
archaeological or
scientific interest

I , as well others feel an Archeological assesment 1 is required for this site as the cities
mapping was created over a decade ago and still does not conform to the
archaeological potential criteria currently applied by the Ontario Ministry of Tourism,
Culture and Sport. This is confirmed in reports accepted by the City

http://webcast.ottawa.ca/plan/All_Image%20Referencing_Zoning%20Bylaw%20Amend
ment%20Application_Image%20Reference_D02-02-13-
0143%20Archaeological%20Resource%20Assessment.PDF
Page 22 of the
ADAMS HERITAGE
3783 Maple Crest Court,
RR#1 Inverary, Ontario K0H 1X0
Phone (613) 353 1463 Fax (613) 353 1463

Ministry of Tourism, Culture and

Sport
Archaeology Program Unit
Programs and Services Branch
Culture Division
401 Bay Street, Suite 1700
Toronto ON M7A 0A7

ArchaeologyReports@ontario.ca

Wise Management of Resources

The Provincial Policy Statement, 2005 includes strong policy direction to protect the
provinces natural
heritage, water, agricultural, mineral, and cultural heritage and archaeological
resources. The protection
of these important resources will help ensure Ontarios long-term prosperity,
environmental health and social
well-being.
Areas of archaeological potential:
means areas with the likelihood to contain archaeological resources. Criteria for
determining archaeological
potential are established by the Province, but municipal approaches which achieve the
same objectives may
also be used. Archaeological potential is confirmed through archaeological fieldwork
undertaken in accordance
with the Ontario Heritage Act

Pestka, J.M., F. Barvencik, F.T. Bell, R.P. Marshall, E. Jopp, A.F. Schilling, A.
Bauerochse, M.
Fansa, K. Pscher and M. Amling
2010 Skeletal analysis and comparison of bog bodies from northern European peat
bogs.
Naturwissenschaften 97:393-402.

peat is one of the best environments for preserving wood

Neolithic, Bronze Age and Iron Age archaeological wooden artefacts from peat
environments in
Great Britain include handles, hilts, scabbards, hafts, sheathes, spears, shields, bows,
arrows, clubs,
watercraft, burial structures and numerous household implements (Coles et al. 1978:6-
23)

Hundreds of wooden artefacts from c.500AD in the early Vanvizdino culture were
preserved in an
oxbow peat bog in the Vychegda Basin near Lake Sindorskoye, Russia (Burov 2008:54)
several human remains have been preserved in peat environments in
Europe (Lobell and Patel 2010:22-29; Pestka et al. 2010)

Hello Erin

As per Province of Ontario Mandate , I am requesting a mandatory Archaeological

Assessment 1 for the
333 Montreal Road site as it is a known Indigenous Camping Site and later owned by
William Bradley , Clements
Bradley , Gidean Olmstead , Thomas Mackay , Thomas Keefer , Robert Cummings and
others which were major builders
of Bytown ( Ottawa )

Archaeological Potential
The City of Ottawas Archaeological Potential mapping does not indicate a small area
of archaeological potential within the 333 Montreal Road site but as stated by numerous
other
Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment's in the area that the city has accepted . this
mapping was created over a decade
ago and does not conform to the archaeological potential criteria currently applied by
the Ontario
Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport.
In determining archaeological potential for this property, therefore, a number of
characteristics are to be considered. In general, these conform to the basic key
archaeological site potential criteria identified by the Ontario Ministry of Tourism,
Culture and Sport and described in their primer document (MTC 1997) and
reemphasized
in the recent Standards and Guidelines for Consultant Archaeologists
(MTC 2011).
AccordingtoMTCSs2011StandardsandGuidelines
the following are characteristics that indicate archaeological potential:
C Previously identified archaeological sites.
C Water sources. It is important to distinguish types of water and
shoreline, and to distinguish natural from artificial water sources, as
these features affect site locations and types to varying degrees:
- primary water sources (lakes, rivers, streams, creeks)
- secondary water sources (intermittent streams and creeks,
springs, marshes, swamps)
- features indicating past water sources (e.g., glacial lake
shorelines indicated by the presence of raised sand or gravel
beach ridges, relic river or stream channels indicated by clear dip
or swale in the topography, shorelines of drained lakes or
marshes, cobble beaches)
- accessible or inaccessible shoreline (e.g., high bluffs, swamp or
marsh fields by the edge of a lake, sandbars stretching into
marsh).
C Elevated topography (e.g., eskers, drumlins, large knolls, plateaux)
C Pockets of well drained sandy soil, especially near areas of heavy soil or
rocky ground
C Distinctive land formations that might have been special or spiritual
places, such as waterfalls, rock outcrops, caverns, mounds, and
promontories and their bases. There may be physical indicators of their
use, such as burials, structures, offerings, rock paintings or carvings.
C Resource areas, including:
food or medicinal plants (e.g., migratory routes, spawning areas,
prairie), scarce raw materials (e.g., quartz, copper, ochre )
C Areas of early Euro Canadian settlement. These include places of early
military or pioneer settlement (e.g., pioneer homesteads, isolated cabins,
farmstead complexes), early wharf or dock complexes, pioneer churches
and early cemeteries. There may be commemorative markers of their
history, such as local, provincial, or federal monuments or heritage
parks.
C Early historical transportation routes (e.g., trails, passes, roads, railways,
portage routes)
C Property listed on a municipal register or designated under the Ontario
Heritage Act or is a federal, provincial or municipal historic landmark or
site Property that local histories or informants have identified with
possible archaeological sites, historical events, activities, or occupations.
MTCS Standards and Guidelines for
Consultant Archaeologists (2011)
Pre-Contact and Post-Contact Archaeological Sites
Based on these criteria, some archaeological potential for pre-Contact and postContact
archaeological sites is deemed to exist, since portions of the study area lie
within less than 300 metres of a former Rideau River tributary.
Although the likelihood of archaeological sites being present in the area is minute,
these areas cannot be exempted from archaeological testing and will require a Stage 1
field investigations (S & Gs 1.4.1c).

Yours Truly

Bryan Murray

Significant archaeological resources

3.3 For prohibiting any use of land and the erecting, locating or using of any class or
classes of buildings or
structures on land that is the site of a significant archaeological resource

D02-02-16-0088
Ward 12 - RIDEAU-VANIER - Mathieu Fleury
Received 2016-10-19
Updated 2016-11-30

http://webcast.ottawa.ca/plan/All_Image%20Referencing_Zoning%20Bylaw%20Amend
ment%20Application_Image%20Reference_D02-02-16-
0018%20STAGE%201%20AND%202%20ARCHAEOLOGICAL%20STUDY.PDF

STAGE 1 AND 2 ARCHAEOLOGICAL

ASSESSMENTS
OF 900 ALBERT STREET
PART LOT 38, CONCESSION 1
OTTAWA FRONT
GEOGRAPHIC TOWNSHIP OF NEPEAN
FORMER COUNTY OF CARLETON
NOW IN THE CITY OF OTTAWA, ONTARIO

Prepared by: Jeff Earl, M.Soc.Sc.

Principal
Past Recovery Archaeological Services Inc.
4534 Bolingbroke Road, R.R. #3
Maberly, Ontario K0H 2B0
Phone: 613-267-7028
E-mail: j.earl@pastrecovery.com

http://webcast.ottawa.ca/plan/All_Image%20Referencing_Zoning%20Bylaw%20Amend
ment%20Application_Image%20Reference_D02-02-14-
0040%20Archaeological%20Resource%20Assessment.PDF
STAGE 1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT
OF CHAUDIERE AND ALBERT ISLANDS
PART LOT 40, CONCESSION A
OTTAWA FRONT
GEOGRAPHIC TOWNSHIP OF NEPEAN
FORMER COUNTY OF CARLETON
NOW IN THE CITY OF OTTAWA, ONTARIO

Prepared by: Jeff Earl, M.Soc.Sc.

Principal
Past Recovery Archaeological Services
4534 Bolingbroke Road, R.R. #3
Maberly, Ontario K0H 2B0
Phone: 613-267-7028
Email: pras@pastrecovery.com

APPENDIX 2: Glossary of Archaeological Terms

Archaeology:
The study of human past by excavation of cultural material.
Archaeological Sites:
The physical remains of any building, structure, cultural feature, object, human event or
activity
which, because of the passage of time, are on or below the surface of the land or water.
Archaic:
A term used by archaeologists to designate a distinctive cultural period dating between
8000 and
1000 B.C. in eastern North America. The period is divided into Early (8000 to 6000
B.C.),
Middle (6000 to 2500 B.C.) and Late (2500 to 1000 B.C.). It is characterized by hunting,
gathering and fishing.
Artifact:
An object manufactured, modified or used by humans.
B.P.:
Before Present. Often used for archaeological dates instead of B.C. or A.D. Present is
taken to
be 1951, the date from which radiocarbon assays are calculated.
Backdirt:
The soil excavated from an archaeological site. It is usually removed by shovel or trowel
and
then screened to ensure maximum recovery of artifacts.
Chert:
A type of silica rich stone often used for making chipped stone tools. A number of chert
sources
are known from southern Ontario. These sources include outcrops and nodules.
Contact Period:
The period of initial contact between Native and European populations. In Ontario, this
generally corresponds to the seventeenth and eighteen centuries depending on the
specific area.
Cultural Resource / Heritage Resource:
Any resource (archaeological, historical, architectural, artifactual, archival) that pertains
to the
development of our cultural past.
Cultural Heritage Landscapes:
Cultural heritage landscapes are groups of features made by people. The arrangement
of features
illustrate noteworthy relationships between people and their surrounding environment.
They can
provide information necessary to preserve, interpret or reinforce the understanding of
important
historical settings and changes to past patterns of land use. Cultural landscapes include
neighbourhoods, townscapes and farmscapes.
Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment
Chaudire and Albert Islands Past Recovery Archaeological Services Inc.
175
Diagnostic:
An artifact, decorative technique or feature that is distinctive of a particular culture or
time
period.
Disturbed:
In an archaeological context, this term is used when the cultural deposit of a certain
time period
has been intruded upon by a later occupation.
Excavation:
The uncovering or extraction of cultural remains by digging.
Feature:
This term is used to designate modifications to the physical environment by human
activity.
Archaeological features include the remains of buildings or walls, storage pits, hearths,
post
moulds and artifact concentrations.
Flake:
A thin piece of stone (usually chert, chalcedony, etc.) detached during the manufacture
of a
chipped stone tool. A flake can also be modified into another artifact form such as a
scraper.
Fluted:
A lanceolate shaped projectile point with a central channel extending from the base
approximately one third of the way up the blade. One of the most diagnostic Palaeo-
Indian
artifacts.
Lithic:
Stone. Lithic artifacts would include projectile points, scrapers, ground stone adzes, gun
flints,
etc.
Lot:
The smallest provenience designation used to locate an artifact or feature.
Midden:
An archaeological term for a garbage dump.
Mitigation:
To reduce the severity of development impact on an archaeological or other heritage
resource
through preservation or excavation. The process for minimizing the adverse impacts of
an
undertaking on identified cultural heritage resources within an affected area of a
development
project.
Multicomponent:
An archaeological site which has seen repeated occupation over a period of time.
Ideally, each
occupation layer is separated by a sterile soil deposit that accumulated during a period
when the
site was not occupied. In other cases, later occupations will be directly on top of earlier
ones or
will even intrude upon them.
Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment
Chaudire and Albert Islands Past Recovery Archaeological Services Inc.
176
Operation:
The primary division of an archaeological site serving as part of the provenience
system. The
operation usually represents a culturally or geographically significant unit within the site
area.
Palaeo-Indian:
The earliest human occupation of Ontario designated by archaeologists. The period
dates
between 9000 and 8000 B.C. and is characterized by small mobile groups of hunter-
gatherers.
Profile:
The profile is the soil stratigraphy that shows up in the cross-section of an
archaeological
excavation. Profiles are important in understanding the relationship between different
occupations of a site.
Projectile Point:
A point used to tip a projectile such as an arrow, spear or harpoon. Projectile points may
be
made of stone (either chipped or ground), bone, ivory, antler or metal.
Provenience:
Place of origin. In archaeology this refers to the location where an artifact or feature was
found.
This may be a general location or a very specific horizontal and vertical point.
Salvage:
To rescue an archaeological site or heritage resource from development impact through
excavation or recording.
Stratigraphy:
The sequence of layers in an archaeological site. The stratigraphy usually includes
natural soil
deposits and cultural deposits.
Sub-operation:
A division of an operation unit in the provenience system.
Survey:
To examine the extent and nature of a potential site area. Survey may include surface
examination of ploughed or eroded areas and sub-surface testing.
Test Pit:
A small pit, usually excavated by hand, used to determine the stratigraphy and
presence of
cultural material. Test pits are often used to survey a property and are usually spaced
on a grid
system.
Woodland:
The most recent major division in the pre-Contact cultural sequence of Ontario. The
Woodland
period dates from 1000 B.C. to A.D. 1550. The period is characterized by the
introduction of
ceramics and the beginning of agriculture in southern Ontario. The period is further
divided into
Early (1000 B.C. to A.D. 0), Middle (A.D. 0 to A.D. 900) and Late (A.D. 900 to
A.D.1550).

Address (Zoning) 244 FOUNTAIN NO STUDY

Ministry of Tourism, Culture and

Sport
Archaeology Program Unit
Programs and Services Branch
Culture Division
401 Bay Street, Suite 1700
Toronto ON M7A 0A7

ArchaeologyReports@ontario.ca

Wise Management of Resources

The Provincial Policy Statement, 2005 includes strong policy direction to protect the
provinces natural
heritage, water, agricultural, mineral, and cultural heritage and archaeological
resources. The protection
of these important resources will help ensure Ontarios long-term prosperity,
environmental health and social
well-being.
Areas of archaeological potential:
means areas with the likelihood to contain archaeological resources. Criteria for
determining archaeological
potential are established by the Province, but municipal approaches which achieve the
same objectives may
also be used. Archaeological potential is confirmed through archaeological fieldwork
undertaken in accordance
with the Ontario Heritage Act
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MARCH 28 , 2017 Planning Committee

-Planning Department recomended refusal

-If appealed to the OMB it was anticipated that a 3 to 4 day hearing would result.( it is a
10 day hearing starting
Aug.13 , 2018 11:00am )
-Funds are not available within existing resources and the expense would impact
Planning, Infrastructure and
Economic Developments operating status.

-Planning Committee changed it to approve( But prohibited at this location:daycare ,

rooming unit and rooming
house , retirement home , residential care facility , shelter )
-Motion Passed 9 yeahs 1 yeah

APRIL 12 , 2017 Council

Council adopted Planning Committee recomendations

all yeahs/no neahs

http://ottwatch.ca/meetings/meeting/6976
OFFICIAL PLAN AND ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENTS 102 BILL LEATHEM DRIVE
ACS2017-PIE-PS-0041 GLOUCESTER-SOUTH NEPEAN (22)

http://app05.ottawa.ca/sirepub/cache/2/oyjnsz1jb2rjhbpkjans32za/43465611062017120
752721.PDF

1
Report to
Rapport au:
Planning Committee / Comit de l'urbanisme
March 28, 2017 / 28 mars 2017
and Council / et au Conseil
April 12, 2017 / 12 avril 2017
Submitted on March 8, 2017
Soumis le 8 mars 2017
Submitted by
Soumis par:
Lee Ann Snedden,
Acting Director / Directrice par intrim,
Planning Services / Service de la planification
Planning, Infrastructure and Economic Development Department / Direction
gnrale de la planification, de linfrastructure et du dveloppement conomique
Contact Person / Personne ressource:
Mike Schmidt, Planner II / Urbaniste II, Development Review West / Examen des
demandes d'amnagement ouest
(613) 580-2424, 13431, Mike.Schmidt@ottawa.ca
Ward: GLOUCESTER-SOUTH
NEPEAN (22) / GLOUCESTERNEPEAN
SUD (22)
File Number: ACS2017-PIE-PS-0041
SUBJECT: Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments 102 Bill Leathem
Drive
OBJET: Modifications au plan officiel et au Rglement de zonage 102,
promenade Bill Leathem
REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS
1. That Planning Committee recommend Council refuse an amendment to
Zoning By-law 2008-250 and an amendment to the City of Ottawa Official
2
Plan to permit the development of a multi-purpose facility which is
proposed to include place of worship, place of assembly and community
centre uses in the Ottawa Airport Operating Influence Zone.

http://app05.ottawa.ca/sirepub/agdocs.aspx?doctype=agenda&itemid=360186

Vote Records (Unofficial Results)

No Action Motion To: DIRECTION TO STAFF: Todays places of worship have
changed immeasurably. In my community
alone from the Ottawa Torah Centre, to Sequoia, to Cedarview Alliance, to South
Nepean Mosque to Salvation Army....all leaders of these places came to me with a
vision for community space. All aforementioned examples are vibrant communities
within Barrhaven as are others across this City. Yes there is a celebration of their faith
but the vast majority of time, 7 days a week, these large community centres are just
that. So my direction to staff is that they study where these larger places of worship and
places of assembly should be placed in the future and that staff prepare a motion for
Council at its next meeting outlining how this will be done.
Passed Motion To: WHEREAS Recommendation 1 of Staff Report ACS2017-PIE-PS-
0041 recommends the refusal of
amendments to Zoning By-law 2008-250 and the City of Ottawa Official Plan to permit
the development of a
multi-purpose facility which is proposed to include place of worship, place of assembly
and community centre uses
in the Ottawa Airport Operating Influence Zone; and WHEREAS having heard the
submissions in support of the
matter; THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Recommendation 1 of Staff Report
ACS2017-PIE-PS-0041 be amended by replacing
the word refuse with the word approve; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT the
proposed site-specific amendments
shall be subject to the following conditions: 1. That the only noise-sensitive land uses
permitted at this
location shall be those defined exclusively as place of assembly, place of worship and
community centre; 2.
That the above noise-sensitive land uses shall only be permitted where the Owner has
provided a noise study to
the satisfaction of the General Manager, Planning, Infrastructure and Economic
Development. It is understood
that the noise mitigation measures recommended in the noise study shall be
implemented to the satisfaction of
the General Manager, Planning, Infrastructure and Economic Development; 3. That
the following uses are
prohibited at this location: daycare rooming unit and rooming house retirement
home
residential care facility shelter 4. That an appropriate covenant be placed
on title
reflecting the fact that the property in question is within the Ottawa Airport Operating
Influence Zone.
(Councillor / Conseiller) R. Chiarelli Yes
(Councillor / Conseiller) S. Blais Yes
(Councillor / Conseillre) J. Harder Yes
(Councillor / Conseiller) J. Cloutier No
(Councillor / Conseiller) R. Brockington Yes
(Councillor / Conseiller) S. Qadri Yes
(Councillor / Conseiller) T. Tierney Yes
(Councillor / Conseiller) J. Leiper Yes
(Councillor / Conseiller) A. Hubley Yes
(Councillor / Conseiller) T. Nussbaum Yes

OTTAWA CITY COUNCIL

Wednesday, 12 April 2017

10:00 a.m.

Andrew S. Haydon Hall, 110 Laurier Avenue West

AGENDA 48

13.
OFFICIAL PLAN AND ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENTS 102 BILL LEATHEM DRIVE
COMMITTEE MEETING INFORMATION
Delegations: Two delegations.
Debate: The Committee spent two hours and 10 minutes on this item.
Vote: Planning Committee CARRIED this item, on a division of 9 yeas and 1
nay, with an amendment
to replace the staff recommendation.
Position of Ward Councillor: Councillor Qaqish is not a voting member of the Planning
Committee but spoke at
Committee in support of the application
Position of Advisory Committee(s): None

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS, AS AMENDED

That Council approve:
1. an amendment to Zoning By-law 2008-250 and an amendment to the City of
Ottawa Official Plan to permit
the development of a multi-purpose facility which is proposed to include place of
worship, place of assembly and
community centre uses in the Ottawa Airport Operating Influence Zone;
2. that the proposed site-specific amendments shall be subject to the following
conditions:
a. that the only noise-sensitive land uses permitted at this location shall be those
defined exclusively
as place of assembly, place of worship and community centre;
b. that the above noise-sensitive land uses shall only be permitted where the
Owner has provided a noise
study to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Planning, Infrastructure and
Economic Development. It is
understood that the noise mitigation measures recommended in the noise study shall be
implemented to the
satisfaction of the General Manager, Planning, Infrastructure and Economic
Development;
c. that the following uses are prohibited at this location:
daycare
rooming unit and rooming house
retirement home
residential care facility
shelter
d. that an appropriate covenant be placed on title reflecting the fact that the
property in question is
within the Ottawa Airport Operating Influence Zone.

http://ottwatch.ca/meetings/file/440871

http://app05.ottawa.ca/sirepub/agdocs.aspx?doctype=agenda&itemid=360187
attachments
20170911_094847
20170912_205537
20170921_125601