Planned Immigration Sales And Marketing

Written By Marvin Thomas Cox Flynn

Copyright 2014 Marvin Thomas Cox
DBA: Marvin Thomas Cox Flynn
All Rights Reserved

I have yet to meet anyone who is against immigration. Without immigration, very few of
us would be here today. Immigration is healthy, natural, and good for the growth of most any
nation. The argument over immigration is not really about the topic of immigration at all, but
about explaining away why our borders remain undefended to this very day, while other nations
secure their borders without opposition from enraged protesters .
In my personal view, our weakest border is not, necessarily, our southern border, though
it attracts the most attention. Our weakest, undefended, border is, quite possibly, our northern
border with Canada. Now Canada is our friend and ally, but so, also, is Mexico, so why the
differentiation in the way we treat one friendly nation over the other?
Is it because we presume that Canada shall always be our friend and never our enemy?
Is it because we presume our nation could never be invaded from the north, but can be invaded
from the south?
The facts of history reveal that we have fought wars against both of these nations: The
war of 1812 (1812-1815) against Canada as a part of the British Empire, and the Mexican-
American War (1846-1848) against Mexico, both caused largely by American expansionist
designs upon both nations (i.e.: The Doctrine of Manifest Destiny 1). Yet, we treat Mexico
differently.
Have we forgotten the war of 1812 1, when the United States launched an attack against
Canada (then a territory of The United Kingdom) in expansionist justification and reprisal for
British attempts to restrict U.S. Trade? Is it because we presume our nation could never be
invaded from the north, but can be invaded from the south? A careful look at history will dispel
any such delusions that would have us believe that our nation cannot be invaded from the
north ...

Planned Immigration Sales & Marketing by M.T. Cox-Flynn Page 1

 The truth is, our nation can be invaded along any given border at any given time by those
who wish to do so, and possess the means to do so. Right now many people, south of the U.S.,
who wish to enter our country are flying to Canada and entering our nation illegally from the
north unhindered and undetected. This is common knowledge among Hispanic people (my wife,
and kids, and her family, are, in fact, American Hispanic citizens).
What is the harm being done then? None in most cases, unless true terrorists are also
crossing our northern border, as most folks that come here just want to work and make an
honest living (Hispanic people, from any nation, are, perhaps, among the hardest working folks
on the planet), and who can blame them for that? Except!
Except for the factand it truly amazes methat so many advocate planned parenthood 2
in dealing with unwanted pregnancies and in planning a family, and yet no thought is given to
the concept of planned immigration. Too much of anything at one time is a bad thing, as we all
know. At harvest time on the farm or come shipping time at the local manufacturing plant, time
and processing must be invested and undertaken in order to cull poor and defective product
from good and acceptable product. The process of inspecting and culling defective, unsafe,
undesirable, product before presentation to the public is a common practice of sales and
marketing.
Why is it so hard to see that the same concept of sales and marketing should also apply to
immigration, along with sound planning as is applied to the concept of planned parenthood?
To plan after the fact, after defective products hit the metaphorical market and shelves of
our nationto plan for children after conception and the arrival of children without the proper
means of supportis a tad too little planning much too late, don't you think?

____________

While you ponder upon my question, let's take a momentary break from our ongoing
conversation of why is it so hard to see that the same concept of sales and marketing should
also apply to immigration, along with sound planning as is applied to the concept of planned
parenthood, and take a sincerely scrutinous look at an incredulously incomprehensible
anomaly. Shall we? We will simply refer to this intermission as an article within an article ...

An incredulously incomprehensible anomaly? Those who adamantly claim to be Pro-

Choice, citing the need for population control in view of the alleged presence and threat of
world overpopulation, also tend to walk hand in hand with those who advocate leniency in
border control as though they were unspoken Globalist members of that UNESCO 3 (United
Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization) spawned covert creation that is

Planned Immigration Sales & Marketing by M.T. Cox-Flynn Page 2

making handy use of Media harnessed, emotion based, social influence in order to promote and
promulgate an insidiously preemptive predecessor movement that exists as a virtual reality
accomplice and supportive partner to the UN's heinous introductory plan to assume control and
ownership of all the Earth's land and natural resourcesa plan that nullifies all individual
personal rights to land and resource ownership in favor of Socialist Communitarian ideals of
One World ownership facilitated and orchestrated by an eventual United Nation's administrated
One World form of governmenteuphemistically disguised by the terminology Sustainable
Development Goals (Keep a wary eye open in your community for this euphemistic terminology
and learn its true meaning & intent!) in order to deceptively cloak its UN origins as United
Nation's Agenda 214 (see Democrats Against Agenda 215) which was signed off on by former
President George H.W. Bush, and has now been transformationally surpassed in its outright
blatant heinousness by the breach birth of a new sibling agenda (United Nation's Agenda 2030 6)
that provides for very near future terminal malignancy deprivation of the very breath and life of
individuals rights in further enhancing United Nation's empowerment over all citizens of this
world: Nations Without Borders7
Hence, according to this anomalous illogical logic, described just above, it is perfectly
okay to abort a fetus (terminate the life of an unborn child) to prevent overpopulation of our
nation and the world, while it is, in the same illogically breathtaking breathe of
incomprehensibility, perfectly okay to allow America to become packed like a can of sardines
with illegal immigrants who choose to breach America's bordersour home as American
Citizens and, thus, not immigrants at all, but let us call a spade a spade (no racial connotation
intended) and clarify, exactly what they are, and what they are is: Intruders; Border Breaching
Home Invasion Intruders, regardless of whatever pure intents and motive they believe they may
have for doing sowhile disrespecting our nation's laws against such actsunlawful acts that
violate laws which are predicated upon our nation's Constitution and Declaration of
Independence (the very essence of what makes America, America, a nation like no other on
Earth), as they (intentionally or not) spit in the face of all that America is and all that we are as
Americans. And in the very same breath of spitting in the face of our nation, spitting in our
faces as American citizens, these Border-Breaching-Home-Invading-Intruders arrogantly seek
to justify their actions by attempting to use our nation's Statue of Liberty, and its poetically
displayed words, against us as a belligerently preposterous means to continue their illegal
assault upon our land:

Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
the wretched refuse of your teeming shore, she wrote. Send these, the
homeless, tempest-tossed to me, I lift my lamp beside the golden door!
An obvious fact of reality that is not proclaimed in the preposterously railing claiming
and ignorantly attested supposition that would have us stupidly believe that folks have some sort
of right to invade our land, our nation, our home, simply because they claim to wish to possess

Planned Immigration Sales & Marketing by M.T. Cox-Flynn Page 3

and live a better life? The famous poem displayed at the Statue of Liberty, speaks to those who
would enter this nation legally in respecting and embracing all that is America, its laws, its
Constitution, and its Declaration of Independence. The perverted and twisted use of this poem
fails to point out that this very poem surely denies entrance access to those, any and all
regardless of alleged circumstances, who fail to respect and recognize the laws of this land
called The United States of Americaa nation that was founded upon America's Declaration of
Independence and Constitution.
Let's put this way by way of an example (bear in mind I love Hispanic people, am
married to a Hispanic woman & love the people of Mexico) that bears forth the fruit of useful
logic and reason: Picture yourself seeking to better yourself, no matter the circumstances or
reasons for wishing to do so, as you stand just across the street from the property and home of a
Mexican family in Mexico, or an American Hispanic family right here in the good ole U.S.A.,
for in this instanced example it makes no never mind. Outside there are signs of law that clearly
state in several languages, including your own: No Trespassing Private Property
Survivors Will Be Prosecuted.

Now, simply take it upon yourself to cross that street in defiance of those highly
informative warning signs, step onto the property of that family of folks, and enter their home by
whatever means you can imaginatively manage in accomplishing your personal desire to better
yourselfa desire that fails to take into account the wishes of that family upon whom you are
encroaching and intruding in your brazen unlawful act of Home Invasion. Is there anyone of
us who doubts that the man of that house, or perhaps even a woman in that home, will greet
such an uninvited intruder with a violent reprisal, possibly even a deadly reprisal, in defense of
their home and land upon which they live? The fact is Hispanic people (remember I have been
a member of a Hispanic family for over 40 years) tend to do more than just frown upon those
who would reveal themselves as Intruders and Home Invaders. One would do well to leave that
home in an ambulanceand that alive
But, here's the true ass pinching clincher to all the endless border drama unfolding each
and every day, right here in America: Having absorbed the information I have provided above,
regarding UNESCO, the Nation's Without Borders movement that is fueled by UNESCO, and
United Nation's Agendas 21 & 2030both of which are currently operating simultaneously in
tandem together, but upon different levels of influence worldwideAgenda 21 doing its dirtiest
damnedest at the local community level, while Agenda 2030 8 carries out its dastardly bastardy
mission at state and national levelsin a round about, but rationally logical, fashion, one could
Planned Immigration Sales & Marketing by M.T. Cox-Flynn Page 4
simply state that the border dilemma currently experienced by America is a direct result of
United Nations, UNESCO, United Nation's Agenda 21 and United Nation's Agenda 2030 covert
influenced mechanization operations at work well behind the scenes in an attempt to bring The
United States of America in line with its directivesfully in tow of compliance cooperation and
subjugation to the will of those Powers Behind The Thrones who do, in reality rule the United
Nations and steer the course of its directive directions and agendas.
So does it, really, take a rocket scientist to cipher out, exactly, why those assailing our
borders behave as though they have a right to maliciously execute an outright migratory
immigration infiltration of our nation, our home, in outright defiance of our borders and our
nation's laws? Hell no! The answer is one of simplistically simpleton ignorancethe
simplistically simpleton ignorance of, we, the American people who, to this very moment in
time, remain almost totally unaware of United Nation's Agenda 21 and United Nation's Agenda
2030, much less aware and comprehendingly cognizant of these wicked twin sister agenda's
implications for America and American sovereignty. What does this statement of fact have to do
with those who assail our borders? Every friggin' thing, because those who, daily assail our
borders are well informed and fully awarevia United Nations Agendas 21 and 2030the
United Nations has, in all fullness of stark ass reality, empowered them to assail our borders at
willcross our borders, occupy, and take up residence within our nation. And this
empowerment shall continue and prevail, unless we come to grips with understanding that the
outcome of the border dilemma facing our nation today shall determine the future of our nation
in the very near tomorrows of the not so distant future.
If you love this nation and wish to preserve its integrity of rights for all of its citizens (for
yourself and your children and grandchildren after you) it is time to wake the f#*k up and smell
the roses of what is transpiring in this world around usexert a determined effort to become
well and accurately informed about the UN's manipulative agendas and policies and events
taking place somewhere besides your own living room or backyardthen, it is damn sure high
time to take and make a stand for America and every culture, religion, and complexion of
representative American citizens who reside here in America, proudly calling America home.
Take and make a stand to support definitively securing our nation's borders from those who
would seek to cross our borders illegally.

____________

Shall we continue with our minds, now, correctly aligned with the facts of logic, reason,
and the preservation of the sovereignty of our nation?
Having had a bit of time to ponder my question presented, above: To plan after the fact,
after defective products hit the metaphorical market and shelves of our nationto plan for
children after conception and the arrival of children without the proper means of supportis a
tad too little planning much too late, don't you think? The answer is a simple one.

Planned Immigration Sales & Marketing by M.T. Cox-Flynn Page 5

 Quite obviously, it truly would be too late. And so it is also true with attempting to
implement an immigration plan that deals with the problem after it has already arrived, rather
than intelligently planning and processing each and every eager and needed immigrant arrival
to our country and their new homeland. It is more than high time to stop pointing political
fingers and do something beneficially positive to protect the borders and sovereignty of our
nation before it is too late.
Yes, common sense does, indeed, dictate, that in the interest of protecting the bordered
sovereignty of our nation, we must deal with the situation at hand, but, rather than talking,
theorizing, speculating, and arguing, at some point in timeas in a time before it is too damn
latea real plan for controlled immigration must be arrived at and implemented, or else we
will soon become a nation of uninvited and unwelcome illegal immigrants (Border Breaching
Home Invading Intruders) run a muck.
Why is it that our elected officials, working in government, cannot apply this same simple
logic that is applied to business, marketing, and planned parenthood each and every day? And
what's more, why do they continue onthe blind leading the blind as they stumble around in the
darkness of impure motives and political agendas of seeking control and power, regardless of
political or ideological affiliation, rather than what is truly best for Americain their
incessantly blatant refusal to admit and acknowledge that America's illegal immigration
problem represents a very real and ominous threat to the very future of America if left
unchecked and unimpeded?
We must secure our borders, including our northern border, from possible military and
terrorist attacks, as well as unlawful incursions by migratory illegal immigrants, and forcefully
redirect the flow of immigration to lawfully designated points of properly authorized entry and
processing in order to navigate immigrants into this country in a planned, methodical, caring
and humane processthereby, making immigration an honorable and legal process, once more,
rather than an illegally uninhibited process that is assuredly detrimental to the safety, security,
sovereignty, and future of our nation. When this importantly urgent goal is accomplished, then,
and only then, will the word immigrant be spoken of with pride in America, once again.
The simple fact is that, when countless millions of people dare to cross the borders of any
sovereign nation upon this earth, and that crossing occurring uninvited and without that
nation's governmental granted permission, such a situation is not a matter of immigration at all,
but is in fact an invasion of that nation. An invasion launched against any nation or people is
most generally associated and received as an act of war. An invading force need not be armed
with guns, tanks, or planes, to effectively achieve their objective, especially if the nation being
invaded offers little or no resistance to the human flood of invading forces.
Ask yourself a simple theoretical question: If Mexico bordered with Iran, how would
illegal immigrants crossing Iran's border be greeted? Now, apply this theoretical situation to
Mexico bordering with Russia or China ...
We must secure every American border from the possibility of military and terrorist
attack, as well as Border Breaching Illegal Immigrant Intruder Invasion, and force the flow of

Planned Immigration Sales & Marketing by M.T. Cox-Flynn Page 6

those sincerely desiring to immigrate to America back to New York Harbor where it once was
and perhaps always should be, or select other points of proper entry and processing in helping
to navigate immigrant applicants into this country in a planned, methodical, caring and humane
process, making immigration a legal process of desirable future citizens, rather than an ever
increasing onslaught of illegal trespassers invading our nation. We must return the term
immigrant to its once honorable status as a word that can be spoken with pride, and represents
future loyal American citizens who have proven themselves obedient to American laws through
the process of entering this nation in a, legally, lawful manner.
At the same time, The very proposed notion of building a mere physical wall along our
Southern Border (a proposed wall giving forth the illusion of security, as well as the impression
of walling undesirables out and Americans in) , is not only fundamentally preposterous but, is
likely to be found offensive to our southern neighbor and friendly ally nation of Mexico. We
must find a way to secure our borders without antagonizing our bordering neighboring nations,
if at all possible. However, our borders must be secured, and a secure southern border benefits,
not only the U.S. but, Mexico as well in that our southern border, secured, becomes their
northern border, secured.
Every nation must defend, protect, and monitor its borders in order to remain a
sovereign nation. However, to date, there is no such thing as a physical wall that cannot be
flown over, tunneled under, or bulldozed down.
An intelligent use of modern technology to detect intruders and defend our borders is a
much more sensible and plausible means of dealing with the current situation, perhaps, even
coupled with a physical wall in order to assist in settling the dispute over the obvious reality
that our southern border is, daily, being overrun and violated by intruders entering our
homeland unlawfully.
In addition, common sense should dictate that if immigration for hard working
individuals, seeking to come to America and make a home and life for themselves here, became
more readily obtainable in assuring the filtering out of undesirables (those who certifiably
prove themselves to truly hold American ideals & values in high esteem), then the only traffic
our nation would have to deal with along our Southern Border (any border) would be illegal,
harmful, and detrimental, traffic (drug & or terrorist related) which could and should be dealt
with by the use of deadly military force to repel and discourage any such invaders from their
attempts to penetrate our borders for profit or whatever subversive agenda.
As Americans who love our country, we must come to understand that the means by
which we currently protect our nation's borders must be redesigned, reconfigured, and
implemented along lines of logical sensibilities that will bring about the effective filtering out of
dangerous undesirables, while insuring a fair and regulated flow of valuable and needed
desirable persons into our nation, for the future of America is not to be found in wealth or
technology, but in peoplehuman resources that treasure our nation's Declaration of
Independence, Constitution, ideals, and way of life.

Planned Immigration Sales & Marketing by M.T. Cox-Flynn Page 7

 History offers to us a lesson, and a strong warning: Europeans did not, in reality,
immigrate to America, for to do so would have required the invitation, permission, and approval
of the Native Americans who lived here upon this land we now occupy. The truth is, Europeans
literally invaded Americaintruded into the home of Native Americansvia the same type of
flood that is daily flowing across our (southern) borders, unchecked and unimpeded to date.
America is being invaded once again, and (to reiterate) it is damn sure high time to wake up
and smell the roses of that unpleasant truth.
After all, unless we share Native American blood, we were once all (each of us, at least,
ancestrally) immigrants in this great land called AmericaThe United States of America ...

(Written June 2nd, 2014 updated & revised November 18th, 2017 & January 10th, 2019)

Planned Immigration Sales & Marketing by M.T. Cox-Flynn Page 8

1 The Doctrine of Manifest Destinyhttps://www.britannica.com/event/Manifest-Destiny
2 For The Record: I am a Women's Rights Pro Life Activist, believing fully that a woman has the right of control of her own body, while also attesting
that all women should be fully informed of the irreversible consequence of aborting their unborn child, consequences much like suicide in that there is
no turning back, and no changing what has been done, once undertaken. Tragically, very few women are, all too often, totally and cluelessly unaware
that abortion is BIG BUSINESS; a world wide business that well exceeds trillions of dollars in profits for Bio-Tech Companies who are provided with
living fetal tissue by Fetal Tissue Brokerage Companies that cleverly circumvent established laws forbidding the sale of fetal tissue, designating that
fetal tissue may be obtained by nonprofit donation only after expenses of preserving, maintaining, and transporting such tissue have been deducted
expenses that are grossly exaggerated in order to generate hidden and protected profits to pad the pocket books of those who peddle human flesh (fetal
cells of some aborted children kept alive for in excess of 20 years after their mother's have ousted them from the womb & that mother ABSOLUTELY
NOT fully informed of these facts) nurtured and preserved, alive for use by researchers who devote their lives to developing new Bio-Technology,
such as taste enhancers, created through the use aborted fetal cells, to spike and spark up the flavor of our favorite soft drinks as a means of generating
sales for companies such as Pepsi Cola, though Pepsi now claims that it will no longer make us of fetal cell developed taste enhancers. For more
information, please see my article posted at scribd.com: https://www.scribd.com/document/319872199/The-Insidiously-Nefarious-Hydra-Entity-That-
is-the-Abortion-Industry-by-Marvin-Thomas-Cox-Flynn
3 UNESCOUnited Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization: UNESCO is the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural
Organization. It seeks to build peace through international cooperation in Education, the Sciences and Culture. UNESCO's programmes contribute to the
achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals defined in Agenda 2030, adopted by the UN General Assembly in 2015. https://en.unesco.org/about-
us/introducing-unesco
4 United Nation's Agenda 21Agenda 21 For Dummieshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TzEEgtOFFlM
5Democrats against Agenda 21... UN Agenda 21/Sustainable Development is the action plan implemented worldwide to inventory and control
all land, all water, all minerals, all plants, all animals, all construction, all means of production, all energy, all education, all information, and all
human beings in the world. INVENTORY AND CONTROL.----Rosa Koire

Considering its policies are woven into all the General Plans of the cities and counties, it's important for people to know where these policies are
coming from. While many people support the United Nations for its 'peacemaking' efforts, hardly anyone knows that they have very specific land
use policies that they would like to see implemented in every city, county, state and nation. The specific plan is called United Nations Agenda 21
Sustainable Development, which has its basis in Communitarianism. By now, most Americans have heard of sustainable development but are
largely unaware of Agenda 21.

In a nutshell, the plan calls for governments to take control of all land use and not leave any of the decision making in the hands of private
property owners. It is assumed that people are not good stewards of their land and the government will do a better job if they are in control.
Individual rights in general are to give way to the needs of communities as determined by the governing body. Moreover, people should be
rounded up off the land and packed into human settlements, or islands of human habitation, close to employment centers and transportation.
Another program, called the Wildlands Project spells out how most of the land is to be set aside for non-humans.

U.N. Agenda 21 cites the affluence of Americans as being a major problem which needs to be corrected. It calls for lowering the standard of living
for Americans so that the people in poorer countries will have more, a redistribution of wealth. Although people around the world aspire to
achieve the levels of prosperity we have in our country, and will risk their lives to get here, Americans are cast in a very negative light and need to
be taken down to a condition closer to average in the world. Only then, they say, will there be social justice which is a cornerstone of the U.N.
Agenda 21 plan ... https://www.democratsagainstunagenda21.com
6 United Nation's Agenda 2030https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I90ka-Br5CQ & https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zfMxsrcr1D0
7 Nations Without BordersNations Without Borders is a global current affairs series featuring stories from members of the World Indigenous Television
Broadcasters Network (WITBN). Fronted by Oriini Kaipara, the series is produced by Australia's National Indigenous Television (NITV) and includes
contributions from NITV, Mori Television, Oiwi TV in Hawaii, Canada's Aboriginal Peoples Television Network (APTN) and Taiwan Indigenous
Television (TITV). https://www.maoritelevision.com/shows/nations-without-borders
8 Agenda 2030 UN Agenda 2030: A Recipe for Global SocialismThe United Nations and its mostly autocratic member regimes have big plans for
your life, your children, your country, and your world. And those plans are not limited to the coercive climate agreement recently concluded in Paris.

While the establishment media in the United States was hyping ISIS, football, and of course global warming, virtually every national
government/dictatorship on the planet met at the 70th annual General Assembly at UN headquarters in New York to adopt a draconian 15-year master plan
for the planet. Top globalists such as former NATO chief Javier Solana, a socialist, are celebrating the plan, which the summit unanimously approved, as
the next Great Leap Forward yes, the old campaign slogan of the Chinese Communist Party.
The master plan is comprised of 17 Post-2015 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) with 169 specific targets to be foisted on all of humanity
literally all of it, as the plan itself states explicitly. As we embark on this collective journey, we pledge that no one will be left behind, reads the UN
manifesto, entitled Transforming Our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. But if you love liberty, self-government, free markets, or the
U.S. Constitution, you will almost certainly be wishing that the UN would leave you behind.
Officially dubbed Agenda 2030, the UN plot, as its full title suggests, is aimed at transforming the world. The program is a follow-up to the last 15-
year UN plan, the defunct Millennium Development Goals, or MDGs. It also dovetails nicely with the deeply controversial UN Agenda 21, even
including much of the same rhetoric and agenda. But the combined Agenda 2030 goals for achieving what is euphemistically called sustainable
development represent previous UN plans on steroids deeper, more radical, more draconian, and more expensive.
This Agenda is a plan of action for people, planet and prosperity, reads the preamble. All countries and all stakeholders, acting in collaborative
partnership, will implement this plan. Ironically, the preamble even claims the UN goals will free the human race from the tyranny of poverty and
heal the planet or, as the planet is also referred to in the document, Mother Earth. Not-so-subtly purporting to usurp the role of God, the UN even
claimed that the future of humanity and of our planet lies in our hands.
Speaking on September 25 at the opening ceremony of the confab that adopted Agenda 2030, Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon hinted at just how far-
reaching the plot really is. The new agenda is a promise by leaders to all people everywhere, he explained, presumably conflating leaders with mass-
murdering gangsters such as Kim Jong-un, Raul Castro, Robert Mugabe, and other despots who hold great sway with most of the regimes comprising the
United Nations. It is a universal, integrated and transformative vision for a better world. We need action from everyone, everywhere, Ban said,
pointing to the guide offered by the 17 SDGs. They are a to-do list for people and planet, and a blueprint for success. We must use the goals to
transform the world, Ban continued. Institutions will have to become fit for a grand new purpose.
The Agenda 2030 agreement makes the audacity of the scheme clear, too. This is an Agenda of unprecedented scope and significance, boasts the
document. Never before have world leaders pledged common action and endeavor across such a broad and universal policy agenda, the agreement
continues. What we are announcing today an Agenda for global action for the next fifteen years is a charter for people and planet in the twenty-first
century.

The Agenda

Perhaps the single most striking feature of Agenda 2030 is the practically undisguised roadmap to global socialism and corporatism/fascism, as countless
analysts have pointed out. To begin with, consider the agendas Goal 10, which calls on the UN, national governments, and every person on Earth to
reduce inequality within and among countries. To do that, the agreement continues, will only be possible if wealth is shared and income inequality is
addressed.
As the UN document also makes clear, national socialism to combat inequality domestically is not enough international socialism is needed to battle
inequality even among countries. By 2030, ensure that all men and women, in particular the poor and the vulnerable, have equal rights to economic
resources, the document demands. In simpler terms, Western taxpayers should prepare to be fleeced so that their wealth can be redistributed
internationally as their own economies are cut down to size by Big Government. Of course, as has been the case for generations, most of the wealth
extracted from the productive sector will be redistributed to the UN and Third World regimes not the victims of those regimes, impoverished largely
through domestic socialist/totalitarian policies imposed by the same corrupt regimes to be propped up with more Western aid under Agenda 2030.
Wealth redistribution alone, however, will not be enough. Governments must also seize control of the means of production either directly or through
fascist-style mandates. We commit to making fundamental changes in the way that our societies produce and consume goods and services, the document
states. It also says that governments, international organizations, the business sector and other non-state actors and individuals must contribute to
changing unsustainable consumption and production patterns to move towards more sustainable patterns of consumption and production.
In plain English, the Agenda 2030 document is claiming that todays consumption and production patterns are unsustainable, so well need to get by with
less. How much less? It would be hard to find a more clear and concise assessment than that offered by the late Maurice Strong, the recently deceased
Canadian billionaire and longtime UN environmental guru who led the 1992 Earth Summit, in a pre-Earth Summit document: It is clear that current
lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle-class involving high meat intake, consumption of large amounts of frozen and convenience
foods, ownership of motor vehicles, numerous electrical appliances, home and workplace air-conditioning ... expensive suburban housing are not
sustainable.
In truth, such lifestyles and consumption patterns are sustainable, so long as the freedom that makes prosperity possible is not destroyed in the name of
achieving sustainability. The UN and the environmental lobby claim that we must get by with less because there are now too many people on the planet
consuming too many resources. But this rationale for accepting UN-imposed scarcity is patently false.

Of course, the promoters of Agenda 2030 would claim that rather than impoverish us, the global regime they envision would take good care of us
through universal health coverage, for instance. One of the targets for Goal 3, ensuring healthy lives and well-being, is: Achieve universal health
coverage, including vaccines for all. Universal access to mental health, along with sexual and reproductive health-care services code words for
abortion and contraception are also included. All governments are expected to integrate such services into their national strategies and programmes,
the agreement demands.
It is worth noting that mass-murdering Soviet dictator Vladimir Lenin made clear that controlled healthcare is the keystone of socialism. The United
Nations obviously agrees. And though he may not call it socialism, Obama undoubtedly also views government control of healthcare as key. Indeed,
enactment of ObamaCare could be viewed as a great leap forward by the United States toward implementation of a key component of Agenda 2030,
before Agenda 2030 was even approved.
But as important as targeting healthcare is to the globalist schemers, any plan for building international socialism would be lacking without also targeting
the next generation with global-socialist propaganda. And so an entire goal of Agenda 2030 is devoted to ensuring that all children, everywhere, are
transformed into what the UN calls agents of change, ready to push forward the plan for the new global order. Children and young women and men are
critical agents of change and will find in the new Goals a platform to channel their infinite capacities for activism into the creation of a better world, the
agreement explains.
The sort of activists that the UN hopes to make your children into is also explicitly defined in the agreement. By 2030, ensure that all learners acquire the
knowledge and skills needed to promote sustainable development, including, among others, through education for sustainable development and sustainable
lifestyles, human rights, gender equality, promotion of a culture of peace and non-violence, global citizenship and appreciation of cultural diversity and of
cultures contribution to sustainable development, the global plan for 2030 states. Considering what the UN means by sustainable development
population control, central planning, global governance, and more the agenda for your children takes on an even more sinister tone.
Sustainable children for global citizenship in the new order will be accomplished via what the UN misleadingly refers to as education. In the UN
document the word education alone is mentioned more than 20 times. And throughout the agreement, the UN openly advocates the use of schools to
indoctrinate all of humanity into a new set of values, attitudes, and beliefs in preparation for the new green and sustainable world order. The UNs
education agenda also puts sex education front and center. By 2030, ensure universal access to sexual and reproductive health-care services [abortion
and contraception], including for family planning, information and education, the document explains.
How much will Agenda 2030 cost? Various figures have been thrown around by UN bureaucrats regarding the monetary costs of the plan, generally
ranging between $3 trillion and $5 trillion per year.
Yes, trillions. In the From Billions to Trillions report released by the World Bank in July 2015, the globalist outfit, a key player in Agenda 2030,
conceded: To meet the investment needs of the Sustainable Development Goals, the global community needs to move the discussion from Billions in
ODA [Official Development Assistance] to Trillions in investments of all kinds: public and private, national and global, in both capital and capacity.
But the money needed to implement Agenda 2030 and other UN schemes is only part of the cost. Other parts include the loss of our national independence
and freedom that the rise of global governance and global socialism would surely entail. Revealingly, empowering dictators to help in global governance is
openly touted by Agenda 2030. The document states, We recommit to broadening and strengthening the voice and participation of developing countries
[the regimes ruling those countries] including African countries, least developed countries, land-locked developing countries, small-island developing
States and middle-income countries in international economic decision-making, norm-setting and global economic governance.

Powerful Promoters

When Agenda 2030 was adopted at the 70th annual UN General Assembly confab in New York City on September 25, the UN plot to re-engineer
civilization was ushered in with a thunderous standing ovation, the UN Department of Public Information reported. Every one of the 193 UN member
governments on the planet from murderous communist and Islamist dictatorships to those ruling what remains of the Free World vowed to help
impose the UNs controversial goals on their subjects.
It all sounded so wonderful to some of the worlds most brutal dictators that they could hardly contain their glee. This agenda promises a brave new
world, a new world which we have to consciously construct, a new world that calls for the creation of a new global citizen, gushed Marxist dictator
Robert Mugabe, the genocidal mass-murderer enslaving Zimbabwe who also serves as chairman of the African Union. I want to believe that we are up to
this task that we have voluntarily and collectively committed ourselves to. Our success, and in particular the promise of a new world that awaits us,
depends upon this commitment. He also promised to vigorously impose the UN Agenda 2030 on the starving and impoverished victims his regime lords
over with Agenda 2030-style policies. The communist Castro regime vowed to work with socialist Venezuelan strongman Nicolas Maduro and other
tyrants to impose the UN goals on their victims, too all with financing from Western taxpayers.
The brutal tyrants ruling Communist China, meanwhile, have also been enthusiastic cheerleaders for the UN goals goals that the regime boasted it
played a crucial role in developing. The Chinese autocracy, infamous for forced abortions, censorship, religious and political persecution, the one-child
policy, terrible pollution, kangaroo courts, and of course, murdering more human beings than any other entity in all of human history, used its vast, global
propaganda machine to celebrate Agenda 2030.
China has made important contributions to the global efforts in reaching a fair, inclusive and sustainable post-2015 development agenda, the regimes
deputy permanent representative to the UN, Wang Min, was quoted as saying in a report by the Communist Chinese news and espionage service Xinhua.
China is also very active in putting forward Chinese proposals. The agreement includes important proposals by China and many other developing
countries in numerous aspects.
Among other commitments, China promised to spend $2 billion in foreign countries to meet the UN goals in education and health, with its funding
increasing to $12 billion by 2030. While only contributing a small piece of the pie, the fact that Beijing is so excited about the agenda is quite revealing.
Echoing Chairman Maos rhetoric, EU and NATO globalist Javier Solana said, With a sustained commitment from all countries, developed and
developing alike, the world can ensure that it celebrates another great leap forward in 2030. (Emphasis added.) The last Great Leap Forward, presided
over by Chairman Mao Tse-tung between 1958 and 1963, resulted in the murder of an estimated 45 million Chinese who were worked, starved, or beaten
to death.
The Obama administration, which apparently does not plan to present the UN scheme to the U.S. Senate for ratification as required by the U.S.
Constitution, also offered a forceful defense of the UN agenda. Speaking to the UN General Assembly on September 27, 2015, after purporting to commit
the United States to the global plot, Obama claimed the UN blueprint is one of the smartest investments we can make in our own future.
Even the worlds leading religious figure, Pope Francis, addressed UN member governments with a plea to support the UN goals. The adoption of the
2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development ... is an important sign of hope, he declared, before demanding a UN climate regime as well.
Beyond governments and religious figures, much of the private sector also enthusiastically backed the new goals. Among the mega-corporations backing
the scheme are the worlds top three search engines: Google, Microsofts Bing, and Yahoo. It was not immediately clear whether those corporations
support for the UN agenda would affect the supposed impartiality of search results, but critics of the UN plan expressed alarm nonetheless.

For now, at least, the world and the White House are all pretending that the SDGs are binding on Americans, too. However, the U.S. Senate was not
consulted, as the Constitution requires for all treaties. And even if the Senate were to ratify it, the federal government cannot grant itself new anti-
constitutional powers merely by approving a treaty. Therefore, the agreement has no force in the United States. But as UN Agenda 21 showed clearly, that
does not mean that the Obama administration, and possibly future presidents, would not attempt to push it forward anyway. The American people,
therefore, must demand through their elected representatives that the UN power grab be stopped.