Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
maturation
includes all transformations between the end of primary fermentation
and the removal of yeast from the beer in preparation for packaging.
Although most beer fermentations are technically complete within 3 to 10
days, the vast majority of beers are not yet ready to drink when the yeast
finishes its primary work of metabolizing sugars. This is because
fermentations tend to produce flavors that are considered undesirable in
finished beer. For this reason, beer must undergo some form of
maturation to become palatable. Maturation is also referred to variously
as conditioning, lagering, and aging.
Graham G. Stewart
fermentation
is the process whereby sugars are converted by yeast to alcohol,
carbon dioxide, and heat. In the brewing of most traditional beer, the
sugars are derived mainly from malted barley, although other cereal
sources and other plant sugars can also be used. These materials also
contribute proteinaceous substances, which in concert with the sugars
and added flavoring agents, notably hops, generate the alcohol, flavors,
and aromas that we know and love as beer. The fermentation process
has been practiced over many thousands of years, with the predilection
for consuming alcohol as a common feature of practically all civilizations
throughout history. In ancient societies, drinking beer had obvious
physiological and psychological benefits (at least with moderate
consumption) and also public health advantages; it was safe to drink,
unlike many sources of water. Aside from this, the apparently mysterious
nature of fermentation lent itself to exaltation in various religious, cult,
and ritual ceremonies. Beverages that we can broadly classify as beers
have been produced throughout the world for thousands of years.
Despite the important place of beer in so many cultures for thousands of
years, the nature of the fermentation process remained a mystery until
the second half of the 19th century. The role of yeast in the
biologicaltransformation of sugars to beer was not fully recognized until
microscopists were able to associate their observations with both the
production of alcohol by yeast and the spoilage of beer by other
microorganisms. However, for centuries before, it had been recognized
that what was called Godisgood in early Englisheffectively yeast
was important in the brewing of beer. Nevertheless, despite these
empirical observations, the prevailing scientific view was that
fermentation was an inanimate, strictly chemical process. Indeed, the
word fermentation is derived from the Latin fevere, meaning to boil,
with the implication that the vigorous carbonation arising from
fermentation, visually akin to boiling, caused the production of the
intoxicating nature and flavors of beer. Louis Pasteur was decisive in
persuading the sceptical scientific community of the mid to late1800s
that fermentation was the result of the action of yeast on sugars,
although by that time many practicing brewers and scientists involved in
brewing were already well aware of the role of yeasts, even if they did
not entirely understand the process. Furthermore, Pasteur was able to
show that other microorganisms were the cause of diseased
fermentations and that hygienic conditions were essential in the
production of beer (and wine) of sound quality. Pasteurs work stimulated
a surge in the scientific investigation of fermentation in Europe. At the
Carlsberg Laboratories in Copenhagen, the pioneering studies of Emil
Hansen on pure culture brewing techniques were quickly adopted by
brewers throughout the world. In England, and most notably in Burton-
on-Trent, leading scientists of the time including Cornelius OSullivan,
Johann Peter Griess, and the half-brothers Adrian John and Horace
Tabberer Brown were developing the understanding of the scientific
basis of brewing and fermentation, much of which underpinned the new
science of biochemistry. Throughout the 20th century, research on
yeasts at a biochemical and genetic level continued at pace, with the
characterization of the type species, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, being of
economic importance in brewing, baking, and winemaking. Although it is
a single-celled organism, S. cerevisiae is a simple form of a eukaryotic
cell in that it has a nucleus enclosing genetic material as chromosomes,
which is defined by a membrane. Animal cells, including our own, are
also eukaryotic, albeit of greater sophistication. However, the eukaryotic
relationship was exploited in that the S. cerevisiae genome was the first
eukaryote to be gene sequenced in 1996, paving the way for the
sequencing of the human genome 10 years later. It is remarkable that
from observations relating to the fermentation of beer, our understanding
of our own genetic makeup and biochemical functioning at cellular and
molecular level has developed to its current levels, directly impacting our
medical well-being. In that context, we should also note that the
developments of industrial scale fermentation used in brewing beer were
utilized and adapted to the production of antibiotics from the 1940s
onward. It is fair to argue that fermentation, and that of beer in particular,
has profoundly influenced our physical well-being more than any other
development in our social history, perhaps with the exception of the
provision of safe water supplies and public health sanitation.
For more than a century, brewers have experimented with the principle
of continuous fermentation in which a fermenting vessel is fed
continuously with wort, with beer produced in a continuous stream at the
same rate as wort addition. Although this type of system has operated in
New Zealand for over 40 years, it is not widely used because of
difficulties in preventing infections and holding the yeast culture in a
steady state. Recently, however, holding yeast on a bed of wood chips
has proved to be effective in retaining the yeast. This process is known
as an immobilized yeast system and is now being used
commercially. See continuous fermentation and immobilized yeast
reactor.
Chris, Boulton, and David Quain. Brewing yeast and fermentation. New
York: Blackwell Science, 2001.
George Philliskirk,
fermentation vessels,
also known as fermenters or FVs (and occasionally spelled fermentors),
are the tanks, barrels, or other vessels where wort is held as it ferments
into beer.
It is in the period between 500 and 1000 ad that we see the first
historical evidence of brewing methods in northern Europe. By this time
the preferred fermentation vessel was made of wood, usually oak, and
oak remained a preferred material well into the 1800s. See oak. Raw
unlined wood was used at first, but by the 1800s most wooden
fermentation vessels were lined with some sort of tar, pitch, or resin. The
lining acted as an inert surface that prevented the beer from coming into
direct contact with the rather soft, rough, and penetrable surface of the
wood. Lined wooden vessels could be cleanedmore effectively, thus
significantly increasing the stability of the beer against both
microbiological infection and off-flavors from the wood itself. Wooden
fermentation vessels were constructed in various dimensionssmall or
large, open or closed, upright or horizontal. Until quite recently, the
fermentation vessels at Pilsner Urquell were still a forest of open wooden
vats, each on its own pedestal. See pilsner urquell. By the time of the
Industrial Revolution, many wooden fermenting vessels were enormous
in size. The most famous (or infamous) of them was a fermenting vat at
the Meux Horse Shoe Brewery in London. See meux reid & co. This
wooden fermentation vessel was 22 ft tall and held over a half million
liters of fermenting beer. At 6:00 pm on October 17, 1814, one of the 29
giant iron hoops that secured the vessel snapped. The vat burst, causing
a chain reaction with surrounding vats, blowing out the wall of the
building, and flooding the street. Two houses were washed away and
nine people died in the London Beer Flood.
Cylindroconical tanks at the Paulaner Brewery in Munich. Cylindroconical tanks have a slanted,
cone-shape bottoms which, among other advantages, allows brewers to easily remove yeast for
disposal or repitching.roger putman
This incident, among others, spurred breweries to begin looking for other
materials than wood for large fermenting vessels. Later in the 19th
century most new and expanding large breweries would include square
concrete fermentation tanks lined with resin, asphalt, slate, or enamel.
Here is a description of a 19th centurystyle London brewery, as
described in 1911:
Around the turn of the 20th century, rapid industrialization brought the
widespread use of mild steel for all types of construction. Mild steel
became the preferred material for building fermentation vessels.
Because mild steel is very susceptible to corrosion by acidic liquids such
as beer, direct contact with beer would cause the vessels to rust, giving
the beer a notable metallic flavor and aroma. Thus, mild steel tanks had
to be lined, and the preferred materials for this were enamel, glass, and
later epoxy-type polymer materials. As long as the enamel or glass lining
stayed intact, this was a perfectly sanitary and easy-to-clean inner tank
surface. However, both enamel and glass are very brittle materials that
eventual start to chip and crack, as does epoxy. Many brewery
operations remained manual, including tank cleaning, and men had to
enter these vessels and hand scrub them after every use. The linings
were easily damaged but very difficult to repair.
One thing was improving; although open fermentation was still practiced
by some large American breweries into the 1970s, the norm in the
United States slowly transitioned to completely closed fermentation. This
made fermentation more sanitary and eased the collection and reuse of
carbon dioxide created by the yeast.
Modern cylindroconical tanks have more than one cooling jacket. This
serves two purposes: first, to give the aforementioned optimal thermal
movement of the beer during fermentation, and second, to allow the
brewer to operate the tank at less than full capacity. A cylindroconical
tank will also have a cleaning device permanently installed in the top,
allowing for easy and automated internal washing of the
tank. Seecleaning in place (cip). Further, there may be more than one
outlet from the tank bottom, allowing the brewer to draw off beer from the
tank without inclusion of yeast that has settled in the bottom of the cone.
Cylindroconical tanks were, from their introduction, well suited for being
placed outdoors, thus saving space and building costs for larger
breweries. Outside tanks are situated in so-called tank farms, where they
are placed very closed to each other. This is made possible by the fact
that no manual operations or servicing of the tanks take place in the tank
farm itself. Rather, all piping to and from the tanks comes from the tank
farm and through an adjacent wall to the beer-processing area inside the
brewery. All automatic pumps, valves, or swing arms that need to be
operated when using the tanks are placed here, largely eliminating the
need for long hoses.
State of the Art in Fermentation Vessels
The most modern breweries still use cylindroconical tanks. The next step
in process development could be the introduction of continuous
fermentation with immobilized yeast. The most recent developments in
the technology of these tanks involve what one could call the
accessories of the tanks in the sense of mechanical mixing
(recirculation by pumping from the bottom to the top) of the fermenting
beer, as well as advanced control systems that automatically measure
and control the progress of the fermentation. See continuous
fermentation and immobilized yeast reactor.
Traditions Maintained
Not all of the traditional tank types have vanished with the introduction of
the cylindroconical tank. The requirements of the process involved in
brewing traditional English ales have made many large breweries stick to
the traditional geometry of square tanks with a penetrable ceiling,
through which the traditional top-fermenting yeasts will accumulate at the
end of primary fermentation and from where the yeast can be
automatically harvested by a combination of valves and jets. This type of
tank is called Yorkshire Square, referring to its shape and the place
where they were invented and became widespread during the 20th
century. Modern Yorkshire squares can be as large in volume as
cylindroconicals and are also closed and fitted with CIP facilities, thus
making them just as easy to automate as cylindroconicals. But because
they are more complex, they are also expensive in terms of investment,
they take up more space, and they cannot normally be placed outdoors.
Garrett Oliver