Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Cosio
After the execution of the aforesaid document, defendant insured the building against fire for the
sum of P15,000, the insurance policy having been issued in the name of defendant. The building
was partly destroyed by fire and, after proper demand, defendant collected from the insurance
company an indemnity of P13,107.00. Plaintiff demanded from defendant that she be credited with
the necessary amount to pay her obligation out of the insurance proceeds but defendant refused to
do so.
ISSUE: WON a mortgagor is entitled to the insurance proceeds of the mortgaged property
independently insured by the mortgagee? What is the effect of the insurance?
HELD: NO. The rule is that where a mortgagee, independently of the mortgagor, insures the
mortgaged property in his own name and for his own interest, he is entitled to the insurance
proceeds in case of loss, but in such case, he is not allowed to retain his claim against the
mortgagor, but is passed by subrogation to the insurer to the extent of the money paid. (Vance on
Insurance, 2d ed., p. 654) Or, stated in another way, the mortgagee may insure his interest in
the property independently of the mortgagor. In that event, upon the destruction of the
property the insurance money paid to the mortgagee will not inure to the benefit of the
mortgagor, and the amount due under the mortgage debt remains unchanged. The
mortgagee, however, is not allowed to retain his claim against the mortgagor, but it passes
by subrogation to the insurer, to the extent of the insurance money paid.