Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 9

Project Job Ref.

STS_ORPIC_FARIC PERGOLA FOUNDATION DESIGN


Section Sheet no./rev.
DESIGN GROUP ENGINEERING
F1 1 01
CONSULTANTS
P.O.BOX 1102, POSTAL CODE 131 Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date
MUTTRAH, SULTANATE OF OMAN GPE 10/8/2017 GPE 9/20/2017 DRK 9/20/2017

FOUNDATION ANALYSIS (EN1997-1:2004)


In accordance with EN1997-1:2004 incorporating Corrigendum dated February 2009 and the UK National Annex
incorporating Corrigendum No.1
TEDDS calculation version 3.2.05

Pad foundation details


Length of foundation; Lx = 1300 mm
Width of foundation; Ly = 1300 mm
Foundation area; A = Lx Ly = 1.690 m2
Depth of foundation; h = 500 mm
Depth of soil over foundation; hsoil = 500 mm
Level of water; hwater = 0 mm
Density of water; water = 9.8 kN/m3
Density of concrete; conc = 25.0 kN/m3

34.2 kN/m 2 56.4 kN/m 2

6.6 kN/m 2 28.9 kN/m 2

Column no.1 details


Length of column; lx1 = 400 mm
Width of column; ly1 = 400 mm
position in x-axis; x1 = 650 mm
position in y-axis; y1 = 650 mm
Soil properties
Density of soil; soil = 18.0 kN/m3
Characteristic cohesion; c'k = 0 kN/m2
Characteristic effective shear resistance angle; 'k = 30 deg
Characteristic friction angle; k = 20 deg
Project Job Ref.
STS_ORPIC_FARIC PERGOLA FOUNDATION DESIGN
Section Sheet no./rev.
DESIGN GROUP ENGINEERING
F1 2 01
CONSULTANTS
P.O.BOX 1102, POSTAL CODE 131 Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date
MUTTRAH, SULTANATE OF OMAN GPE 10/8/2017 GPE 9/20/2017 DRK 9/20/2017

Foundation loads
Self weight; Fswt = h conc = 12.5 kN/m2
Soil weight; Fsoil = hsoil soil = 9.0 kN/m2

Column no.1 loads


Permanent load in x; FGx1 = 0.1 kN
Permanent load in y; FGy1 = 1.2 kN
Permanent load in z; FGz1 = 25.4 kN
Variable load in x; FQx1 = 0.8 kN
Variable load in y; FQy1 = 0.1 kN
Variable load in z; FQz1 = -8.4 kN
Permanent moment in x; MGx1 = 3.0 kNm
Permanent moment in y; MGy1 = 0.2 kNm
Variable moment in x; MQx1 = 0.7 kNm
Variable moment in y; MQy1 = 4.3 kNm
Bearing resistance (Section 6.5.2)
Forces on foundation
Force in x-axis; Fdx = FGx1 + FQx1 = 0.9 kN
Force in y-axis; Fdy = FGy1 + FQy1 = 1.3 kN
Force in z-axis; Fdz = A (Fswt + Fsoil) + FGz1 + FQz1 = 53.3 kN

Moments on foundation
Moment in x-axis; Mdx = A (Fswt + Fsoil) Lx / 2 + FGz1 x1 + MGx1 + FGx1 h + FQz1 x1 + MQx1
+ FQx1 h = 38.7 kNm
Moment in y-axis; Mdy = A (Fswt + Fsoil) Ly / 2 + FGz1 y1 + MGy1 + FGy1 h + FQz1 y1 + MQy1
+ FQy1 h = 39.7 kNm

Eccentricity of base reaction


Eccentricity of base reaction in x-axis; ex = Mdx / Fdz - Lx / 2 = 76 mm
Eccentricity of base reaction in y-axis; ey = Mdy / Fdz - Ly / 2 = 95 mm
Pad base pressures
q1 = Fdz (1 - 6 ex / Lx - 6 ey / Ly) / (Lx Ly) = 6.6 kN/m2
q2 = Fdz (1 - 6 ex / Lx + 6 ey / Ly) / (Lx Ly) = 34.2 kN/m2
q3 = Fdz (1 + 6 ex / Lx - 6 ey / Ly) / (Lx Ly) = 28.9 kN/m2
q4 = Fdz (1 + 6 ex / Lx + 6 ey / Ly) / (Lx Ly) = 56.4 kN/m2
Minimum base pressure; qmin = min(q1, q2, q3, q4) = 6.6 kN/m2
Maximum base pressure; qmax = max(q1, q2, q3, q4) = 56.4 kN/m2
Presumed bearing capacity
Presumed bearing capacity; Pbearing = 150.0 kN/m2
PASS - Presumed bearing capacity exceeds design base pressure
Partial factors on actions - Combination1
Permanent unfavourable action - Table A.3; G = 1.35
Permanent favourable action - Table A.3; Gf = 1.00
Variable unfavourable action - Table A.3; Q = 1.50
Variable favourable action - Table A.3; Qf = 0.00
Project Job Ref.
STS_ORPIC_FARIC PERGOLA FOUNDATION DESIGN
Section Sheet no./rev.
DESIGN GROUP ENGINEERING
F1 3 01
CONSULTANTS
P.O.BOX 1102, POSTAL CODE 131 Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date
MUTTRAH, SULTANATE OF OMAN GPE 10/8/2017 GPE 9/20/2017 DRK 9/20/2017

Partial factors for spread foundations - Combination1


Bearing - Table A.5; R.v = 1.00
Sliding - Table A.5; R.h = 1.00

Forces on foundation
Force in x-axis; Fdx = G FGx1 + Q FQx1 = 1.3 kN
Force in y-axis; Fdy = G FGy1 + Q FQy1 = 1.8 kN
Force in z-axis; Fdz = G (A (Fswt + Fsoil) + FGz1) + Qf FQz1 = 83.3 kN

Moments on foundation
Moment in x-axis; Mdx = G (A (Fswt + Fsoil) Lx / 2 + FGz1 x1) + G MGx1 + Q MQx1 + Qf
FQz1 x1 + (G FGx1 + Q FQx1) h = 59.8 kNm
Moment in y-axis; Mdy = G (A (Fswt + Fsoil) Ly / 2 + FGz1 y1) + G MGy1 + Q MQy1 + Qf
FQz1 y1 + (G FGy1 + Q FQy1) h = 61.6 kNm

Eccentricity of base reaction


Eccentricity of base reaction in x-axis; ex = Mdx / Fdz - Lx / 2 = 68 mm
Eccentricity of base reaction in y-axis; ey = Mdy / Fdz - Ly / 2 = 90 mm
Effective area of base
Effective length; L'x = Lx - 2 ex = 1164 mm
Effective width; L'y = Ly - 2 ey = 1121 mm
Effective area; A' = L'x L'y = 1.305 m2

Pad base pressure


Design base pressure; fdz = Fdz / A' = 63.8 kN/m2
Sliding resistance (Section 6.5.3)
Forces on foundation
Force in x-axis; Fdx = G FGx1 + Q FQx1 = 1.3 kN
Force in y-axis; Fdy = G FGy1 + Q FQy1 = 1.8 kN
Force in z-axis; Fdz = Gf (A (Fswt + Fsoil) + FGz1) + Q FQz1 = 49.1 kN

Sliding resistance verification (Section 6.5.3)


Horizontal force on foundation; H = [Fdx2 + Fdy2]0.5 = 2.2 kN
Sliding resistance (exp.6.3a); RH.d = Fdz tan(k / ') = 17.9 kN
PASS - Foundation is not subject to failure by sliding
Partial factors on actions - Combination2
Permanent unfavourable action - Table A.3; G = 1.00
Permanent favourable action - Table A.3; Gf = 1.00
Variable unfavourable action - Table A.3; Q = 1.30
Variable favourable action - Table A.3; Qf = 0.00

Partial factors for spread foundations - Combination2


Bearing - Table A.5; R.v = 1.00
Sliding - Table A.5; R.h = 1.00

Forces on foundation
Force in x-axis; Fdx = G FGx1 + Q FQx1 = 1.1 kN
Project Job Ref.
STS_ORPIC_FARIC PERGOLA FOUNDATION DESIGN
Section Sheet no./rev.
DESIGN GROUP ENGINEERING
F1 4 01
CONSULTANTS
P.O.BOX 1102, POSTAL CODE 131 Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date
MUTTRAH, SULTANATE OF OMAN GPE 10/8/2017 GPE 9/20/2017 DRK 9/20/2017

Force in y-axis; Fdy = G FGy1 + Q FQy1 = 1.3 kN


Force in z-axis; Fdz = G (A (Fswt + Fsoil) + FGz1) + Qf FQz1 = 61.7 kN

Moments on foundation
Moment in x-axis; Mdx = G (A (Fswt + Fsoil) Lx / 2 + FGz1 x1) + G MGx1 + Q MQx1 + Qf
FQz1 x1 + (G FGx1 + Q FQx1) h = 44.5 kNm
Moment in y-axis; Mdy = G (A (Fswt + Fsoil) Ly / 2 + FGz1 y1) + G MGy1 + Q MQy1 + Qf
FQz1 y1 + (G FGy1 + Q FQy1) h = 46.4 kNm

Eccentricity of base reaction


Eccentricity of base reaction in x-axis; ex = Mdx / Fdz - Lx / 2 = 71 mm
Eccentricity of base reaction in y-axis; ey = Mdy / Fdz - Ly / 2 = 103 mm
Effective area of base
Effective length; L'x = Lx - 2 ex = 1158 mm
Effective width; L'y = Ly - 2 ey = 1094 mm
Effective area; A' = L'x L'y = 1.267 m2

Pad base pressure


Design base pressure; fdz = Fdz / A' = 48.7 kN/m2
Sliding resistance (Section 6.5.3)
Forces on foundation
Force in x-axis; Fdx = G FGx1 + Q FQx1 = 1.1 kN
Force in y-axis; Fdy = G FGy1 + Q FQy1 = 1.3 kN
Force in z-axis; Fdz = Gf (A (Fswt + Fsoil) + FGz1) + Q FQz1 = 50.7 kN

Sliding resistance verification (Section 6.5.3)


Horizontal force on foundation; H = [Fdx2 + Fdy2]0.5 = 1.7 kN
Sliding resistance (exp.6.3a); RH.d = Fdz tan(k / ') = 14.5 kN
PASS - Foundation is not subject to failure by sliding
Partial factors for uplift limit state - Table A.NA.15
Permanent unfavourable action; G.dst = 1.10
Permanent favourable action; G.stb = 0.90
Variable unfavourable action; Q.dst = 1.50
Variable favourable action; Q.stb = 0.00

Uplift limit state verification


Vertical force; Fdz.u = G.stb (A (Fswt + Fsoil) + FGz1) + Q.dst FQz1 = 42.9 kN
PASS - Foundation is not subject to failure by uplift

FOUNDATION DESIGN (EN1992-1-1:2004)


In accordance with EN1992-1-1:2004 incorporating Corrigendum dated January 2008 and the UK National Annex
incorporating National Amendment No.1
TEDDS calculation version 3.2.05

Concrete details (Table 3.1 - Strength and deformation characteristics for concrete)
Concrete strength class; C30/37
Characteristic compressive cylinder strength; fck = 30 N/mm2
Characteristic compressive cube strength; fck,cube = 37 N/mm2
Project Job Ref.
STS_ORPIC_FARIC PERGOLA FOUNDATION DESIGN
Section Sheet no./rev.
DESIGN GROUP ENGINEERING
F1 5 01
CONSULTANTS
P.O.BOX 1102, POSTAL CODE 131 Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date
MUTTRAH, SULTANATE OF OMAN GPE 10/8/2017 GPE 9/20/2017 DRK 9/20/2017

Mean value of compressive cylinder strength; fcm = fck + 8 N/mm2 = 38 N/mm2


Mean value of axial tensile strength; fctm = 0.3 N/mm2 (fck/ 1 N/mm2)2/3 = 2.9 N/mm2
5% fractile of axial tensile strength; fctk,0.05 = 0.7 fctm = 2.0 N/mm2
Secant modulus of elasticity of concrete; Ecm = 22 kN/mm2 [fcm/10 N/mm2]0.3 = 32837 N/mm2
Partial factor for concrete (Table 2.1N); C = 1.50
Compressive strength coefficient (cl.3.1.6(1)); cc = 0.85
Design compressive concrete strength (exp.3.15); fcd = cc fck / C = 17.0 N/mm2
Tens.strength coeff.for plain concrete (cl.12.3.1(1)); ct,pl = 0.80
Des.tens.strength for plain concrete (exp.12.1); fctd,pl = ct,pl fctk,0.05 / C = 1.1 N/mm2
Maximum aggregate size; hagg = 20 mm
Reinforcement details
Characteristic yield strength of reinforcement; fyk = 500 N/mm2
Modulus of elasticity of reinforcement; Es = 210000 N/mm2
Partial factor for reinforcing steel (Table 2.1N); S = 1.15
Design yield strength of reinforcement; fyd = fyk / S = 435 N/mm2
Nominal cover to reinforcement; cnom = 30 mm
Shear diagram, x axis
Shear (kN)

12.3

0.0
0.0
1 2
-5.1

-22

Moment diagram, x axis


Moment (kNm)

3.4

-0.7
1 2
1.7

7.1

Rectangular section in flexure (Section 6.1)


Design bending moment; MEd.x.max = 3.4 kNm
Depth to tension reinforcement; d = h - cnom - y.bot - x.bot / 2 = 452 mm
K = MEd.x.max / (Ly d2 fck) = 0.000
K' = 0.207
K' > K - No compression reinforcement is required
Lever arm; z = min((d / 2) [1 + (1 - 3.53 K)0.5], 0.95 d) = 429 mm
Project Job Ref.
STS_ORPIC_FARIC PERGOLA FOUNDATION DESIGN
Section Sheet no./rev.
DESIGN GROUP ENGINEERING
F1 6 01
CONSULTANTS
P.O.BOX 1102, POSTAL CODE 131 Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date
MUTTRAH, SULTANATE OF OMAN GPE 10/8/2017 GPE 9/20/2017 DRK 9/20/2017

Depth of neutral axis; x = 2.5 (d - z) = 57 mm


Area of tension reinforcement required; Asx.bot.req = MEd.x.max / (fyd z) = 18 mm2
Tension reinforcement provided; 9 No.12 dia.bars bottom (155 c/c)
Area of tension reinforcement provided; Asx.bot.prov = 1018 mm2
Minimum area of reinforcement (exp.9.1N); As.min = max(0.26 fctm / fyk, 0.0013) Ly d = 885 mm2
Maximum area of reinforcement (cl.9.2.1.1(3)); As.max = 0.04 Ly d = 23504 mm2
PASS - Area of reinforcement provided is greater than area of reinforcement required
Crack control (Section 7.3)
Limiting crack width; wmax = 0.3 mm
Variable load factor (EN1990 Table A1.1); 2 = 0.3
Serviceability bending moment; Msls.x.max = 2.4 kNm
Tensile stress in reinforcement; s = Msls.x.max / (Asx.bot.prov z) = 5.5 N/mm2
Load duration factor; kt = 0.4
Effective depth of concrete in tension; hc.ef = min(2.5 (h - d), (h - x) / 3, h / 2) = 120 mm
Effective area of concrete in tension; Ac.eff = hc.ef Ly = 156000 mm2
Mean value of concrete tensile strength; fct.eff = fctm = 2.9 N/mm2
Reinforcement ratio; p.eff = Asx.bot.prov / Ac.eff = 0.007
Modular ratio; e = Es / Ecm = 6.395
Bond property coefficient; k1 = 0.8
Strain distribution coefficient; k2 = 0.5
k3 = 3.4
k4 = 0.425
Maximum crack spacing (exp.7.11); sr.max = k3 (cnom + y.bot) + k1 k2 k4 x.bot / p.eff = 455 mm
Maximum crack width (exp.7.8); wk = sr.max max([s kt (fct.eff / p.eff) (1 + e p.eff)] / Es,
0.6 s / Es) = 0.007 mm
PASS - Maximum crack width is less than limiting crack
Shear diagram, y axis
Shear (kN)

11
0.0
1 2
-6.8

-23.8

width
Project Job Ref.
STS_ORPIC_FARIC PERGOLA FOUNDATION DESIGN
Section Sheet no./rev.
DESIGN GROUP ENGINEERING
F1 7 01
CONSULTANTS
P.O.BOX 1102, POSTAL CODE 131 Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date
MUTTRAH, SULTANATE OF OMAN GPE 10/8/2017 GPE 9/20/2017 DRK 9/20/2017

Moment diagram, y axis


Moment (kNm)

3.7

-1.2
1 2
2.6

7.7

Rectangular section in flexure (Section 6.1)


Design bending moment; MEd.y.max = 3.7 kNm
Depth to tension reinforcement; d = h - cnom - y.bot / 2 = 464 mm
K = MEd.y.max / (Lx d2 fck) = 0.000
K' = 0.207
K' > K - No compression reinforcement is required
Lever arm; z = min((d / 2) [1 + (1 - 3.53 K)0.5], 0.95 d) = 441 mm
Depth of neutral axis; x = 2.5 (d - z) = 58 mm
Area of tension reinforcement required; Asy.bot.req = MEd.y.max / (fyd z) = 19 mm2
Tension reinforcement provided; 9 No.12 dia.bars bottom (155 c/c)
Area of tension reinforcement provided; Asy.bot.prov = 1018 mm2
Minimum area of reinforcement (exp.9.1N); As.min = max(0.26 fctm / fyk, 0.0013) Lx d = 909 mm2
Maximum area of reinforcement (cl.9.2.1.1(3)); As.max = 0.04 Lx d = 24128 mm2
PASS - Area of reinforcement provided is greater than area of reinforcement required
Crack control (Section 7.3)
Limiting crack width; wmax = 0.3 mm
Variable load factor (EN1990 Table A1.1); 2 = 0.3
Serviceability bending moment; Msls.y.max = 2.2 kNm
Tensile stress in reinforcement; s = Msls.y.max / (Asy.bot.prov z) = 5 N/mm2
Load duration factor; kt = 0.4
Effective depth of concrete in tension; hc.ef = min(2.5 (h - d), (h - x) / 3, h / 2) = 90 mm
Effective area of concrete in tension; Ac.eff = hc.ef Lx = 117000 mm2
Mean value of concrete tensile strength; fct.eff = fctm = 2.9 N/mm2
Reinforcement ratio; p.eff = Asy.bot.prov / Ac.eff = 0.009
Modular ratio; e = Es / Ecm = 6.395
Bond property coefficient; k1 = 0.8
Strain distribution coefficient; k2 = 0.5
k3 = 3.4
k4 = 0.425
Maximum crack spacing (exp.7.11); sr.max = k3 cnom + k1 k2 k4 y.bot / p.eff = 336 mm
Maximum crack width (exp.7.8); wk = sr.max max([s kt (fct.eff / p.eff) (1 + e p.eff)] / Es,
0.6 s / Es) = 0.005 mm
PASS - Maximum crack width is less than limiting crack width
Project Job Ref.
STS_ORPIC_FARIC PERGOLA FOUNDATION DESIGN
Section Sheet no./rev.
DESIGN GROUP ENGINEERING
F1 8 01
CONSULTANTS
P.O.BOX 1102, POSTAL CODE 131 Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date
MUTTRAH, SULTANATE OF OMAN GPE 10/8/2017 GPE 9/20/2017 DRK 9/20/2017

Rectangular section in flexure (Section 6.1)


Design bending moment; abs(MEd.y.min) = 1.2 kNm
Depth to tension reinforcement; d = h - cnom - x.top - y.top / 2 = 452 mm
K = abs(MEd.y.min) / (Lx d2 fck) = 0.000
K' = 0.207
K' > K - No compression reinforcement is required
Lever arm; z = min((d / 2) [1 + (1 - 3.53 K)0.5], 0.95 d) = 429 mm
Depth of neutral axis; x = 2.5 (d - z) = 57 mm
Area of tension reinforcement required; Asy.top.req = abs(MEd.y.min) / (fyd z) = 7 mm2
Tension reinforcement provided; 9 No.12 dia.bars top (155 c/c)
Area of tension reinforcement provided; Asy.top.prov = 1018 mm2
Minimum area of reinforcement (exp.9.1N); As.min = max(0.26 fctm / fyk, 0.0013) Lx d = 885 mm2
Maximum area of reinforcement (cl.9.2.1.1(3)); As.max = 0.04 Lx d = 23504 mm2
PASS - Area of reinforcement provided is greater than area of reinforcement required
Crack control (Section 7.3)
Limiting crack width; wmax = 0.3 mm
Variable load factor (EN1990 Table A1.1); 2 = 0.3
Serviceability bending moment; abs(Msls.y.min) = 0.1 kNm
Tensile stress in reinforcement; s = abs(Msls.y.min) / (Asy.top.prov z) = 0.3 N/mm2
Load duration factor; kt = 0.4
Effective depth of concrete in tension; hc.ef = min(2.5 (h - d), (h - x) / 3, h / 2) = 120 mm
Effective area of concrete in tension; Ac.eff = hc.ef Lx = 156000 mm2
Mean value of concrete tensile strength; fct.eff = fctm = 2.9 N/mm2
Reinforcement ratio; p.eff = Asy.top.prov / Ac.eff = 0.007
Modular ratio; e = Es / Ecm = 6.395
Bond property coefficient; k1 = 0.8
Strain distribution coefficient; k2 = 0.5
k3 = 3.4
k4 = 0.425
Maximum crack spacing (exp.7.11); sr.max = k3 (cnom + x.top) + k1 k2 k4 y.top / p.eff = 455 mm
Maximum crack width (exp.7.8); wk = sr.max max([s kt (fct.eff / p.eff) (1 + e p.eff)] / Es,
0.6 s / Es) = 0 mm

PASS - Maximum crack width is less than limiting crack widthPunching shear (Section 6.4)
Strength reduction factor (exp 6.6N); v = 0.6 [1 - fck / 250 N/mm2] = 0.528
Average depth to reinforcement; d = 458 mm
Maximum punching shear resistance (cl.6.4.5(3)); vRd.max = 0.5 v fcd = 4.488 N/mm2
k = min(1 + (200 mm / d), 2) = 1.661
Longitudinal reinforcement ratio (cl.6.4.4(1)); lx = Asx.bot.prov / (Ly d) = 0.002
ly = Asy.bot.prov / (Lx d) = 0.002
l = min((lx ly), 0.02) = 0.002
vmin = 0.035 N1/2/mm k3/2 fck0.5 = 0.410 N/mm2
Design punching shear resistance (exp.6.47); vRd.c = max(CRd.c k (100 N2/mm4 l fck)1/3, vmin) = 0.410 N/mm2
Design punching shear resistance at 1d (exp. 6.50); vRd.c1 = (2 d / d) vRd.c = 0.821 N/mm2
Project Job Ref.
STS_ORPIC_FARIC PERGOLA FOUNDATION DESIGN
Section Sheet no./rev.
DESIGN GROUP ENGINEERING
F1 9 01
CONSULTANTS
P.O.BOX 1102, POSTAL CODE 131 Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date
MUTTRAH, SULTANATE OF OMAN GPE 10/8/2017 GPE 9/20/2017 DRK 9/20/2017

Column No.1 - Punching shear perimeter at column face


Punching shear perimeter; u0 = 1600 mm
Area within punching shear perimeter; A0 = 0.160 m2
Maximum punching shear force; VEd.max = 28.7 kN
Punching shear stress factor (fig 6.21N); = 1.500
Maximum punching shear stress (exp 6.38); vEd.max = VEd.max / (u0 d) = 0.059 N/mm2
PASS - Maximum punching shear resistance exceeds maximum punching shear stress

9 No.12 dia.bars bottom (155 c/c)


9 No.12 dia.bars top (155 c/c)

9 No.12 dia.bars bottom (155 c/c)


9 No.12 dia.bars top (155 c/c)

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi