Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
2017-2018
LW 588
Welcome!
Welcome to the study of Public Law 1. We hope you find it an enjoyable and
rewarding course. There is a great deal of useful information in the Module Guide to
the course. You were given a hard copy of this during Welcome Week and there is a
virtual copy on Moodle. Please read it if anything is not clear speak to your seminar
leader.
Seminars take place weekly with the first seminar taking place in week 2. There is
little preparation for this introductory seminar but please do read the seminar details
listed below at Seminar 1. Future seminars will require extensive preparation and you
will need to plan your study time carefully. You should start preparing for seminar 2
as soon as possible as it requires sustained reading.
Seminars
You are provided with an instruction sheet for each seminar. These sheets will
set out the objectives of the seminar
indicate the preparation required before the seminar all readings listed
there are essential
set out questions which you must answer in writing prior to the seminar,
and which will be discussed during the seminar
o NB: Seminar leaders will check preparation for seminars has been
completed by each student
where appropriate, suggest further reading so that you can extend your
knowledge and understanding.
After each seminar you should make additions to your notes, re-reading the
readings/cases if necessary. Any of the additional readings that you did not get to
read before the seminar you should look at now. Check that you understand the
terms we have highlighted in the questions or that have arisen in lectures or
seminars. The more useful the notes you make at this stage, the more useful they will
be for the future. Dont forget, everything you learn will be assessed at some stage
of the course.
1
Getting the most out of seminars
Seminars are key to success in this module. To ensure that you get the most out of them:-
Prepare fully, taking notes and ensuring that if you have found any material
difficult, you are ready to ask questions about it.
Arrive promptly. Check that you know where you are going before the first
seminar!
Participate in the seminar. You only learn by taking risks. We are not looking for
the right answers necessarily what we want is an intelligent engagement with
the subject matter. Ask questions, particularly about any difficulties you have
encountered.
Use the seminars to help you voice your thoughts. Finding your voice is a crucial
dimension of Higher Education - and one which ensures your work is original.
Listen to the views of others. You might not agree with them, but all contributions
are useful in developing our understanding of materials. Respond courteously, but
make your point of view clear.
After the seminar, think again about the questions and the discussion and amend
your notes appropriately. Your seminar notes are a very valuable resource for your
written work and your exams.
Attendance
You must make every effort to attend the seminar for which you are timetabled.
Seminar attendance is taken very seriously by the Law School and non-attendance
will be noted. More importantly the assessment of Public Law 1 is based upon the
knowledge and skills which are developed within the seminars. Success depends
upon participation in seminars.
If you are unable to attend a particular seminar for a good reason please tell your
seminar leader and arrange to attend another seminar in that cycle. If the alternative
seminar is led by a different seminar leader then ask them if it is all right to attend
some seminars are very full, so it may not always be convenient.
2
The Law School Student Guide includes the following paragraph in connection with
Law School seminars.
Seminars are a crucial element of our learning and teaching strategy and are
designed to ensure that all students who come prepared benefit from attendance.
Seminar attendance is compulsory, is monitored and performance in seminars is used
by staff in preparing references. Students are expected to prepare fully for seminars
and to contribute to discussions. As a last resort, seminar leaders have the discretion
to ask a student to leave a seminar if, in their view, the student's presence is
impeding the learning experience of other students in the seminar. In some
circumstances this may include students who fail to meet the requirement to
prepare.
What is on Moodle?
3
Seminar 1 Introducing Public Law
Week 2
Objectives
Introduce you to your seminar leader and the other students in your seminar
group
Explain how seminars operate and how you can get the most out of them
Discuss the reading materials you will be using during the year
Consider study expectations and the need for independent research
particularly in relation to your assessments
Provide an opportunity to discuss a topic relevant to Public Law
Ensure that you know what to do in order to be prepared for your next
seminar
Preparation
Think about what the term public (in public law) means to you and why it
might be important for you as both a citizen and a law student
Bring in some visual images that might represent a citizen or the state
Read a broadsheet newspaper like the Guardian, Independent or the Times
(they are available online as well) and see if you can identify any news stories
and cases that relate to public law
Familiarise yourself with these two online public law resources/blogs:
o http://ukconstitutionallaw.org/blog/ (This is the blog of the UK
Constitutional Law Association and it contains short authoritative
pieces by leading constitutional lawyers in the UK and internationally)
o http://ukhumanrightsblog.com (It includes case lists, news update,
articles, history by human rights articles and by topic)
In the seminar:
You will be asked about any news items and images you have found and how
they are relevant to public law.
You will be given a news item relevant to public law and will be asked to read
it in the seminar. The seminar leader will then facilitate a discussion on the
topic and invite comments from students.
4
Seminar 2 Democracy
Week 3
Objectives
Preparation
Read the following extracts from David Helds book Models of Democracy 3rd edn
(2006 Cambridge: Polity):
pages 1-8 (from the Introduction) and
Chapter 3, (pages 56-70) The Development of Liberal Democracy: For and
Against the State
These extracts can be found in the Public Law 1 materials pack.
Rule of law
Questions
Students should prepare ALL these questions when doing the reading. The seminar
leader may parcel out specific questions for individuals to present.
1a. Is democracy simply about voting or should it involve more than that? Consider
the nature of what one is voting for:
political parties in a general election
a head of state or particular policies
a new constitution or
separation - independence for a region and so on.
1b. Who determines the nature of the subject matter that voters get to vote on?
5
- not be a prisoner or someone who has been convicted of a crime?
4. Explain the core idea of liberalism as David Held characterises it. What dilemmas
does this theory face?
5. What was the central problem that Thomas Hobbes was addressing? Identify the
liberal and illiberal elements and consequences of his thinking.
6. What are the starting assumptions in John Lockes political thinking and how are
his ideas different to those of Hobbes?
Further Reading
6
Seminar 3 The limits of Democracy Brexit and Parliamentary Sovereignty
Week 4
Objectives
Preparation
Questions
1. What were some of the key reasons given by each side for voting leave or
remain?
2. Outline the arguments given by the vote leave campaign that relate to the
sovereignty of the UK parliament. How do they think Brexit will be an
improvement from the current situation?
3. The Government wanted to trigger Article 50 using an executive power (the
royal prerogative) but the Supreme Court said in the Miller case [2017] that
an Act of Parliament was required to authorise triggering Article 50. Do you
think it should have been left to the government or was it right that
Parliament needed to authorise it by an Act of Parliament? Explain your
reasoning.
4. To what extent was the referendum a good thing for democracy? Answer this
in light of the ideas of Hobbes and Locke discussed in the previous seminar.
7
Objective: To prepare for Assessment 1 by using the time in reading week to
undertake the significant amount of reading and preparation for seminars 4 and 5.
8
Seminar 4 Parliamentary Sovereignty
Week 6
Objectives
Preparation
The judgment is on Moodle and can also be found here with the 2 page
summary: https://www.judiciary.gov.uk/judgments/r-miller-v-secretary-of-
state-for-exiting-the-european-union/
Watch:
Questions
2. What were the historical tensions from which sovereignty emerged? Who or
what is the source of sovereignty: judges, the people, parliament itself?
4. What are the key facts, legal issues and ratio in the Miller judgment in the
High Court?
5. What are the key features of Parliamentary Sovereignty outlined in the
judgment paragraphs 18-31?
6. What role does the royal prerogative play in this judgment? Explain both
the government position on the prerogative and the argument of the other
side.
7. What is the constitutional significance of this case?
Additional Question
Further Reading
Lord Bingham, The Rule of Law and the Sovereignty of Parliament, Lecture
given at Kings College, London, 31st October. (In the materials pack).
10
Seminar 5 Rule of Law
Week 7
Objectives
Preparation
Read:
Joseph Raz, The Rule of Law and its Virtue (1977) 93 Law Quarterly Review
195-202.
Lord Bingham, The Rule of Law (2007) 66 (1) The Cambridge Law Journal 67-
85 (especially pages 69-82)
Questions
1. A friend or family member asks you to explain the key ideas of the rule of the
law. How would you explain the idea in a way that a non-specialist could
understand?
2. Explain what is meant by the formal conception of the rule of law, what are
the different aspects that Raz and Dicey discuss? Give specific examples.
4. Do you favour one of the conceptions of the rule of law over the other?
Explain your thinking. Can you have one conception of the rule of the law
without the other or are they interdependent?
5. What role do human rights play in upholding the rule of law? To what extent
does human rights legislation need a special constitutional status?
11
Seminar 6 Limits to the Rule of Law
Week 8
Objectives
Preparation
Read:
Questions
1. Outline the key facts, legal issues and ratio in the Belmarsh case. You will
need a detailed knowledge of the case to answer this. Please draw on both
judgments and any others you have read.
2. Consider in what way the tension between parliamentary sovereignty and the
rule of law manifests itself in Lord Binghams decision of A v Secretary of
State for the Home Department (Belmarsh case).
3. How does Baroness Hale view this tension and in particular how does she
envisage the separation of powers and the different roles of the legislature,
executive and judiciary.
4. What are the limits to the rule of law in this and other cases?
Further Reading
Jeffrey Jowell, The Rule of Law in Jeffery Jowell, Dawn Oliver and Colm
OCinneide The Changing Constitution (8th edition). (OUP, 2015).
12
Seminar 7 The Royal Prerogative & Government Accountability
Week 9
Objectives
Preparation
Read:
Sebastian Payne, The Royal Prerogative in M.Sunkin and S.Payne (eds) The
Nature of the Crown (1999 Oxford: OUP). This is available on moodle.
Chapter 9, Le Sueur, Sunkin and Murkens, Public Law Text, Cases and
Materials, 3rd edition (2016, Oxford: OUP)
or
Chapter 4, Loveland, Constitutional Law A Critical Introduction, 7th edition
(2015, Oxford: OUP).
Questions
4. Analyse the Northumbria Police Authority case and answer the following
questions:
a. What were the facts of the case?
b. What were the issues in relation to the royal prerogative?
c. What did the judges decide and do you agree with their reasoning?
13
Week 10: Writing Week - No seminars or lectures.
14