Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract A right setup for diagnostics analysis at groups within an organization quality team which deals
the subassembly level can facilitate an analyst to look for with the early portion of its life cycle, reliability group for
obvious test areas, see stress diagnostically, and keep the middle portion, and durability test group to figure issues
real maintenance scenarios. This is achieved by for equipment wear out.
combined evolutionary analysis of physics of failure with
maintenance analyses and simulation technologies. II. CASE STUDY
Maintenance-based analysis and simulation can be In this section, we provide a simple example of how an
enhanced stress simulations where many parts are integration of electronic physical stress simulation subjected
replaced in the ambiguity group. to mechanical influences and resulting diagnostics based
analysis would work in the proposed Automated System to
I. BACKGROUND helps support the design stress failure modes and failed
Early Quality Reliability Engineering disciplines which date component isolation prognostics for a simplified cooling
back to World War II have developed a traditional view of subsystem.
Quality, Reliability & Durability (QRD) product life cycle
for electronics. It is usually represented with a classic Bath
Tub Failure Rate Curve made up of the sum of three
different phenomena infant mortality, randomness, and
wear out.
Figure 1 shows that early failures during products life
occur due to infant mortality issues. After that, a second
phase starts with a period of fairly stable failure rates which
are attributed to random events or chance problems. Finally,
we eventually come to a point where electronic equipment
starts to wear out and be at the end of its life.
Figure 2: Interaction of Diagnostic Flow Diagram and Design View
Display
Figure 4: Transient stresses experienced by the PCB and its component due
to random vibration and thermal cycling.
A. Results
Figure 6(a) shows a typical Damage-Boundary diagram,
where the x-axis represents PCB thickness, y-axis
resonance frequency of the PCB, and the lines (referred to
as Critical Frequency and Critical PCB thickness)
separation of damage and no damage regions.
Figure 6: Fatigue cycle ratio values with respect to resonance frequencies
of the PCB and thickness.
B. Conclusions
In this simple example, we demonstrate how our proposed
Automated System combines electronic physical stress
simulation subjected to mechanical influences and resulting
diagnostics-based analysis and simulation on stress related
failure modes.