Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
[-]
Nomencl atur e viscosity [g/cmsec]
[cm]
V
equivalent diameter of duct kinematic viscosity [cm2[g/cm3]/sec]
d
diameter of separation area [cm] Pf density of fluid
diameter of aggregate particle M, [cm] Pp particle density [g/cm s]
diameter of primary particle M, [cm] a surface tension [ dyne/cm]
critical particle diameter [/4 [cm] Ob bending stress [ dyne/cm2]
FH Op
dimensionless adhesive force by water strength of aggregate particle [ d yne/cm2 ]
bridge (=H/dpla) [-] T
[d yne/cm 2]
H
shearing stress
adhesive force by water bridge [dyne]
k
coordination number [-] Literature Cited
M [dynecm]
M
moment 1) Fuchs, N. A. : "Mechanics of Aerosols", Pergamon Press,
*f
f moisture content on dry basis [wt %] New York (1964).
drag force [dyne] 2) Kanou, T. "Funtairyushi no Kyodou", p. 303, Sangyo-
u air velocity [cm/ s ec] Gijyutsu Center (1977).
u average air velocity [cm/ s ec] 3) von Karman, Th.: Proc. 3rd Intern. Congress Appl.
Y Mech., Stockholm, Part I, 85 (1931).
dimensionless distance ( =yldp)
y
distance above flat surface [cm] 4) Kousaka, Y., K. Okuyama, A. Shimizu and T. Yoshida:
y* /. Chem. Eng. Japan, 12, 152 (1979).
distance from flat surface to separated
part ofFig.2aggregate particle as shownin 5) Ridgway, K and K.J. Tarbuck: Brit. Chem. Eng., 12,
[cm] 384 (1967).
Z = section modulus [cm3] 6) Rumpf, H.: Chem. Ing. Tech., 42, 538 (1970).
7) Zimon, A. D.: "Adhesion of Dust and Powder", p. 197,
T = velocity gradient [1 /sec] Plenum Press, New York (1969).
d = thickness of laminar sub-layer [fA, [cm]
A new power correlation for both anchor and helical ribbon impellers in highly viscous Newtonian
liquids is proposed on the basis of a physical model developed from an analytical approximate
expression for the drag of a plate in viscous liquids bounded by a plane wall. The correlation,
obtained by inserting the empirical factor of geometrical variables in the above expression, shows
good agreement with experimental data of power consumption of anchor and helical ribbon agitators
obtained in this work and other literature.
For anchor agitators having np=2: Fig. 4 Schematic diagram of blade motion
Snfi
1m~gc
UdL
'21n(4+8c/w)-l
1 - K)