Cassino 2nd offer to Chase to settle for 50k and Chase initial reply per Cynthia 10-20-2017

Cassino 2nd offer to Chase to settle for 50k which is 40k more than 5-3-2016 1st offer of 10k to Jamie Dimon to settle

---------- Forwarded message ----------

From: Lowery-Graber, Cynthia <cynthia.lowery-graber@bryancave.com> Date: Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 9:09
AM
Subject: RE: Cassino proposed settlement
To: Tim Bullock <bullocklaw@gmail.com>
Cc: "Tomassi, Ron" <Ron.Tomassi@bryancave.com>, "Warren, Courtney"
<Courtney.Warren@bryancave.com>, Alan Karsh <AKarsh@karshfulton.com>, Fred Gabler
<FGabler@karshfulton.com>

Hi Tim,

Thank you for your message below. I will forward it to our client but, based on my understanding of several
factors, believe this will be a non-starter. The most concerning issues are highlighted below.

First, it is my understanding that the unpaid balance on the loan is over $275,000 which makes the cash
payment offer under 20% of the total amount owed. (Cassino says unpaid balance is totally incorrect and
Chase stated Nov 2013 in FDIC v Chase settled for $1 billion it iss not successor in interest to WaMu loans as
Cassinos loan is a WaMu loan)

Second, Chase has a lien interest in the property, not a vested ownership interest and, therefore, a warranty
deed would be wholly unnecessary and without merit. (Cassino says chain of title is broken from original lender
Community Mortgage Group, Inc. to WaMu to ?? Chase to ?? JP Morgan Chase PERIOD.)

Third, Chase cannot legally mislead the IRS or credit reporting agencies with respect to the way any settlement
would be reported or with respect to the reporting of the status of the loan on Mr. Cassinos credit. (Cassino
says Chase has mislead IRS on transfer of loan/note/dot-mortgage into REMICS avoiding billions in taxes
illegally. Cassino says no 1099(a) or 1099(c) legally by Chase absorbing its loss on an outrageous retaliation
on Cassino for joining a nationwide developing Mass Joinder v. JP Morgan Chase NA for mortgage fraud by
lender not borrower).

I am working to confirm the mediation for November 7 which will hopefully give both of our clients the
opportunity to express their positions more fully. (Cassino says he is really looking forward to explaining to the
mediator - with a fully supporting brief - this outrageous wrongful foreclosure attempt case that Chase should
be absolutely ashamed of if it had true business ethics and morals -and penalized for trying to get a free 5.1
acre parcel instead of a home for the public good) As soon as I receive a response from Chase, I will advise.

Cynthia Lowery-Graber
Attorney
cynthia.lowery-graber@bryancave.com T: +1 303 866 0331

From: Tim Bullock [mailto:bullocklaw@gmail.com]

Sent: Friday, October 20, 2017 8:30 AM
To: Lowery-Graber, Cynthia
Subject: Cassino proposed settlement

Cindy:
Per our earlier discussions about possible settlement, my client desires to continue negotiation with Chase and
has authorized me to propose the following terms:

1. Casino will pay Chase $50K in full settlement of all claims Chase may have against either parcel or against
Cassino. This amount will be paid out of proceeds received by Mr. Cassino from:

a) the encroaching party's settlement (Jordans);

b) the sale of a portion of land from the two parcels (a contract is already in place with the
McSweeneys).

2. Chase agrees to sign the mylar copy of their surveyors minor adjustment submitted to Jeffco planning and
zoning and release its lis pendens.

3. Chase agrees to cooperate in any other matter necessary to reconfigure Parcel II for the McSweeneys and the
Jordans and remove itself from any claim to title.

4. Any conveyance by Chase shall be by general warranty deed with title insurance policies provided by Chase
in favor of Mr. Casino should it later be discovered that Chase had no equitable or legal interest in the parcels.

5. Simultaneous closings involving Chase, Cassino, McSweeney's and the Jordans - by November 20th, 2017.
(Cassino says otherwise McSweeneys want a refund of $5,000 down as this was to close 6/9/2017 so they
could start building their dream home but has been extended 3 times since till 12/31/2017 or provable $145-
140,000 loss due to fraudulent photoshopped Chase/MERS self assigned Corporate Assignment of Deed of
Trust instrument a false instrument filed in the land records which is a felony. Which requires a second
separate complaint for damages by Cassino)

6. Release of any other interest recorded by Chase or its agents in Jeffco land records related to either parcel.

7. Chase agrees to pay our attorneys fees.

8. Chase agrees to not issue a 1099(a) or 1099(c).

9. Chase agrees to correct credit reporting with respect to this matter and Cassino within 30 days of closing.

Thank you for submitting this proposal of settlement to your client. We believe the protections of CRE 408
apply to this offer.

Sincerely,

Tim Bullock
BULLOCK LAW L.L.C.
827 Good Hope Drive
Castle Rock, CO 80108
p.303.552.7099
f.303.495.2198

Tuesday, May 3rd, 2016 Mr. Jamie Dimon offer letter next page
Tuesday, May 3rd, 2016

Mr. Jamie Dimon

Chairman & CEO
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
270 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10017
212-270-1111
jamie.dimon@jpmchase.com

RE: Lance Cassino "Cassino" and JPMorgan Chase "Chase" > Is it time to finally settle Chase v.
Cassino and Cassino v. Chase?

Dear Mr. Dimon,

Sometimes favorable "win win settlement offers" need to be made to the top decision maker - this is one - so
that you at least had the opportunity to decide who to delegate it to for accepting or rejecting our offer.

This settlement offer simply boils down to Chase paying its own attorney fees and the same for Cassino after
more than 5 years of legal action in both State and Federal courts.

This foreclosure case started when Chase wrongfully refused accepting my regular monthly payment on
1/15/2011 - after I retained Mitchell J. Stein & Associates 12/20/2010 to negotiate a loan mod if Chase was
holder in due course of my deed and note and if not quiet title. I retained Mr. Stein after 3 HAMP/HARP loan
modification turn downs in 2009-2010 - even though I was qualified - Chase was not. At the time of Chase
refusing payment 1/15/2011, I was following the local Colorado Chase representative's advice the previous
month to request a 4th loan modification request.

I am offering Chase a $10,000 settlement of Chase's 5 year wrongful foreclosure attempt litigated in both
Jefferson County District Court and Federal Court 2011-2013 which has been in a stalemate since Chase
withdrew their foreclosure case and agreed to a "partial settlement" in March 2013 paying me $10,000 for my 3
attorneys fees and to withdraw my counter claim for quiet title.

For the $10,000 Chase records both a satisfaction of deed and an instrument to nullify the false and fraudulent
corporate assignment of deed of trust recorded by Chase/MERS on 9/28/2011, plus agreeing to not issuing any
1099 for deficiency as there is none with Chase.

By paying Chase $10,000 to settle this, Cassino is in effect paying his own attorneys fees (now totaling over
$20,000) and Chase is paying for their own attorney fees.

Chase wrongfully entered into that "partial settlement" with no capacity, no standing and no jurisdiction. The
two law firms representing Chase www.KutakRock.com (lead attorney Jeremy Peck)
and www.KarshFulton.com (lead attorney Fred Gabler) withdrew from representing Chase and the law firm
involved in filing the false Notice of Election and Demand 3/17/2011 and the false Chase/MERS corporate
assignment of deed of trust - Aronowitz & Mecklenberg - was shut down by the Colorado Attorney General
2013?. Chase v Cassino and Cassino v Chase has been in a stalemate since.
Regarding Aronowitz & Mecklenberg attorney Lisa Cancanon: It is Cassino's understanding and belief that she
filed a false instrument - the Notice of Election and Demand for Sale violating Colorado Statute 18-5-114
Offering a false instrument for recording is a felony. And it is also Cassino's understanding and belief that
Kutak Rock LLC attorney Jeremy Peck may have been involved in filed false instruments, the Corporate
Assignment of Deed of Trust and 2 different Affidavits of Lost Note/Instrument upon the court and the
trustee.

Mr. Dimon the following are Chase's key problems - as we see it - in not settling this matter very soon:

1 - Chase in general has no capacity, jurisdiction and standing as note holder in due course - person entitled to
enforce "PETE".
2 - Fraud at loan closing sometime in 2005 - with "Community Mortgage Group, Inc." which was not the actual
lender, M.E.R.S. not being fully disclosed, securitization not being fully disclosed, the deed and note did not
make it to trust, and more.
3 - Fraud by Chase attorney for recording a false instrument in the land records - the Notice of Election and
Demand for Sale to foreclose filed on or about 3/17/2011 by law firm Aronowitz and Mecklenburg (which was
forced to sell or shut down by the Colorado Attorney General in 2014).
4 - Fraud by Chase attorney/s for recording a false instrument in the land records - 6 months after claiming
"PETE" - on 9/28/2011 by filing the Chase/MERS corporate assignment of deed of trust by robo-signing and
robo-notarizing.
5 - In 2011-12 Chase states to court and trustee that Chase lost the "note or instrument" per 2 different V.P.
affidavits by robo-signing and robo-notarizing.
6 - The "Community Mortgage Group, Inc." deed and note are null and void by operation of law effective
1/30/2015 or 2/5/2015 by TILA rescission.
7 - The "Community Mortgage Group, Inc." deed has only a vacant 5 acre parcel on it - not the adjoining 5
acres with home and improvements on it. Oddly, Community Mortgage Group, Inc. went out of business 2
months after closing in 2005.
8 - Chase had no capacity, jurisdiction and standing to enter into "partial settlement" made in March 2013 when
Chase paid $10,000 of Cassino attorney fees trying to con Cassino into reforming Community Mortgage Group,
Inc. deed of trust to add 5 acres with home and improvements.
9 - In future discovery from Cassino securitization analysis report/s regarding account transactions it is likely
that insurance payments and other financial transactions will show Chase guilty of unjust enrichment and
unclean hands.
10 - Chase - because of the above and even more - is guilty of false and fraudulent foreclosure for maximum
damages allowed.

The cases involved are documented for you and your decision makers in a nutshell at:

www.CassinovChase.weebly.com < this settlement offer letter to Mr. Jamie Dimon and more.

www.CassinoAndCFPBvChase.weebly.com < the previous legal actions the last 5 plus years.

The settlement offer is for Chase to use some of the $4 billion allocated to homeowners in the $13 Billion
Justice Department settlement with Chase in November 2013 plus $10,000 from Cassino for Chase to complete
a quiet title on my vacant 5.1 acre parcel, which again, is all that is on the deed of trust.
If this settlement offer is not acceptable, we will then both take further legal action in the court of law as
documented at the above Cassino v. Chase case sites and now in the court of public opinion.

If this settlement is acceptable, please have your people contact my attorney of record on this matter - Jordan
Porter, 720-295-9028, JDPorterLLC@gmail.com - to reduce to a final settlement agreement for execution and
signing.

Thank you,

Lance Cassino
POB 1050
Conifer, CO 80433
303-838-0221
lancecassino@msn.com
www.SolutionsInternet.US

c.c.:
Mr. Jamie Dimon c/o The Corporation Company, 1675 Broadway, #1200, Denver, CO 80202
Colorado Attorney General Cynthia Coffman, 1300 Broadway, 10th Floor Denver, CO 80203
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, P.O. Box 4503, Iowa City, Iowa 52244

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Chase settles with U.S. for $13 Billion

$4 billion goes to homeowners
Los Angeles Times - Nov. 20, 2013

http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-jpmorgan-doj-deal-20131120,0,1814328.story#axzz2lEDP1hy3

JPMorgan Chase agreed to a $13-billion settlement with the government over selling shoddy mortgage
investments, ending a legal battle that signals a tougher stance against Wall Street wrongdoing. The nation's
largest bank admitted to knowingly peddling the toxic securities that helped lead to the housing bubble and
the worst financial meltdown since the Great Depression.

California, slammed by 1 million foreclosures during the mortgage meltdown, will be a major beneficiary of
the deal. The agreement includes $4 billion to help homeowners across the nation who were foreclosed on or
who are struggling with their loans.

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) said he was pleased officials were taking action. "What the American people
understand is that we continue to be in the midst of a terrible, terrible economic downturn because of the
greed and recklessness and illegal behavior of Wall Street, Sanders said. And I think people want justice to
be done."
It was unclear Tuesday how the $4-billion relief program would be apportioned to struggling homeowners.
Chase said it would distribute the assistance over the next four years. Half of the program will go toward
writing down the balance of mortgages and waiving certain payments on home loans. Most of that would be
achieved through outright forgiveness of first-mortgage debt.
Investors in Chase appeared to be relieved the bank was able to arrive at the the largest settlement made by
any single American company in history. The bank's shares rose 41 cents, or 0.7%, to $56.15 on Tuesday, while
major U.S. stock indexes edged lower. So apparently Wall St. thinks the Biggest Bank got off light.

http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2013/11/20/where-does-jpmorgans-13-billion-go/