Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
SPE 21112
* SPE member
References and I I IUstratlons at end of paper. Hydrates crystallize Into two types of
structure, known es I and II. The
SPE 21112
crletllilizatiol' ba"I!;;;!i)' ct,!>el1d!os 01\ the size 1, 2 . . . n, which Ict 85 the clathrllte's
of the trappec IT'oiecule. Sma!! m'llecules host lattice.
crystllill ze Into Struc,ture I en~ lergs
molecules, In'to Str!1cture 1t. The numbH of cllgas of type" per molecule
Q denoted by
IS In the' case of v" .
A St un I t c e !! i 1> 1> h O\'in I n fig. 1.
r uc tu r a I
It contains ~S molecules th~t form two types hydroqulnones. v=1/3; for Structure I hydrates,
v a =1/23 and v z =3/23; lind for Str~cture I I
of clIges. The smal I cegss ~re IDcated at the
vertices and center of tbe eel I unit and each hydrates, va =2/17 and v z =1/17.
Is compo~ed of cO water moleculer ielG Qut in
the shape of a pentagona' dodecahedron. Tne six These con5lderlltlon~ were takan Into
remaining wllter molecules ir' tht ~Illt cell form account In designing the model:
bridges between tnese 'oaecaneoro~s, tnereby
cre6tl ns IC secon~ ty!'e of cags, ca II e~ e ! arse - The cages are spher I ca I.
cage. The latter con5ists of a tttr3decahe~ron
With twelue psntBgcnB Bides an6 two opposite - The t rap pe d mo lee u I e rna y 1Il0 ve,' f r eel y
hexagona I 6! oes\, within the cage.
These are the ccmpotltian cnaracterlstics
- Each cage mllY contain a maximum of one
for a Struc~u'! i n.dri~e:
gas molecule.
The trapped gas moleculas do not
2 sma I i ;;&gee Co 2C ei 3. SS'! Interact.
c,
- The gas molecules are smal I enough thllt
f! I ergc CS:BS " 24 11 "J.31}~ they tio not distort the lattice.
2'." 2
iJ: = RT{ l
m
"'mk In ( 1 + 2'
J
Gmkj fJ (6) where A ,nd B
constants.
are e~perlmentall y adjusted
The fugac I ty of component j I n the gas In the computer code that has been deVised,
mixture Is calculated by USing Eq. 7. Eq.12 Is uBed whenever the temperature under
stUdy Is within Its range of vallllity. only
. . . . . . . . . . . . (7) when the temperature exceedS thiS range IS Eq.
8 used to calculate the langmuir constant. ThiS
procedure saves a tremendous amount of computer
where Yj Is the molar fraction of component time yet does not Jeopardize the aCcuracy of
In the gas phase; Is "'j
the fugacity the final result.
coeff I c I ent of component j I n the gas ml xture, lastly. { Is a constant OJ proportlona.llty,
calculated by using the Peng-Roblnson equation Introduced by Ng and Robinson to Improve the
of state; and P Ie the total absolute pressure results obtained In pradlctlng equilibrium
of the system. The binary Interaction when there Is a binary Interaction between the
coefficients k. . In the Peng-Roblnson equation molecules of the gas mixture. The constant Is
l.. " J
of state were taken from Gmehllng at al. a function of the concentration Of the moleCUle
of the most volatile hyllrate- forming component
The langmul r constant macroscoplcall y and of a binary Interaction factor ~. It Is
represents the microscopic-level Interaction expressed as
of gae-water molecules In the cage. Using
the lenarll-Jones-Oevonslll re cell mollel, van
der Waale and Platteeuw2 ehowed that the
{ = nj {1 + 3(0..-1)Yz - 2(01.-1 )j"a}
J J J J
(13)
5 28
. . . . (9)
When Ice and hydrate co-eXist, Eq. 14
becomes
r > 2a
where & Is the characteristic energy, a Is the
core radius, and C + 2a is the coil islon
diameter. Eq. S descrlDes the Interaction of
R T
iJ(T
..,
R
0
,P0 )
T0
01
r I
0
/i ho.
R ~
" dT +
R T
"
~a(T .p )
v
R T0
0
11/v )
0
J: 0
(Aha + Ah' )
v v
R T
2
dT + CalCUlating the freezing-point depression for
the wlter.
Owing to the presence of Inhibitors,. Eq. 23
J:
(Ava +
'" dP - In r", Xv . . . . . . . . . . (18) la used In calculating the freezl~g-polnt
the molar enthalpy and molar volume of the where Cl, &2. C3, 7and C'I Ire ellperlmentally
water caused by the phase change from 5011 d adjusted constants for eacll Inhibitor. and ~L
water (Ice) to liquid water; that Is,
Is the Inhibitor concentration (mola fraction)
I1h~ h~ - h~ and AV~ = v~ - v~ (17) I n the aqueous phase.
These values et Po Ind To Ire ahown In Ten typas of Inhibitors ware used:
methanol, ethanol, propanol, sodium Chloride,
Table 2. potassium chloride, calcium chloride, ammonia,
ethylene glycol, diethylene glvcol, and
Solving Eq. '5 blsed on the previously trleth~lene gl~col.
formullted hypotheaes,
Solving the Equilibrium
o
[~ - -']
f14.la. ~o Ahv
v v
+ + The equl I Ibrlum problem Is solved when Eq.
R T R T0 R To 3 Is satisfied.
AvO Since al I aquatlons Involved req~lre that
v
P - In r ",lIv .. ( , 8) pressure and temperature be known. the
RT temperature Is set Ind the dissociation
pressure of the hydrate Is estimated
Eq. 18 18 dlveloped almllarly. Iterltlvely. Dissociation pressures are
calculated for structures I and II; tlll!- lesser
The concentration of water In the aqueous of the two pressures Is the correct preisure.
phallll Xv Is calculatlld by ulling Eq. '9.
Ca I cu lations Ire performed. numerl ca II y.
This stUdV relied on the Pegasus method, which
II . (19) Is a secant method modified to spesd up
v
convergence. The procedure. Is only slightly
whllrll ljT la thll sum of the molar fractions of slower than the Newton method but offers the
advantege of not requiring the derivative of
the gases dissolved In the water, and where the function. Convergence 15 obtained With a
Ill. Is the molar fraction of Inhibitor dissolved mlxlmum of eight Iterations.
In the water.
Ths program was Implemented In FORTRAN ANSI
The molar fraction of each species j 77. It calculates dissociation pressures and
dissolved In the water Is clliculated by temperatures, the quantity of Inhibitor to be
using the Krlchevsky-KallarnovkllY equation. used, and the type of crystal line structure
formed by the hydrate.
I j
II. ............... (20)
(~ ~j)
J
H. ellp ANALYSIS OF RESULTS
J
and
Simulations were conducted bV using
H ellp <1. + BIT> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (21 ) Systems with end without Inhibitors, and
J J J
dissociation pressures were calculated for g8S
hydrates. In both cases. systems were
where II j Is the molar fraction of component classified 8S simple, binary, or
mUltlcomponent.
dissolved In the aqueous phase; I j Is the
fugac I ty of the component j I n the gas phase, The prasent study sought to check the new
calculated by using the Peng-Roblnson equation method against a representative number of
of st~te; Hj Is the Henry constant for the data. The choice of elmple and binary syetems
(totalling '19) wa5 Irbltrary and limited to the
gas; vj Is the partial molar volume of the moet common in the II terlture. Since data on
c omp 0 ne nt j; and A? and Bar e ell per I me nt a I I Y mu I tic omp 0 n e n t 5 l' 5 t ems, and e 5 pe c I a I I y o n
adjusted constlnts . Systsms slmila,' to natural gas, ars relatlvaly
scarce In the I terature and, furthermore,
The act!~lty coefficient of the water r v Is since thsse sy!tsmB J-e of marked Importance
~~ ... ~o be un ::y wnr'"=r the system under In the petroleum Indu~try, In effort was made
stud' 15 composed of , te and gas. Calculating to analyze as many as possible In this
I r... Inhibltus IH .. ?,fsent entailS the use case, 18.
I"': 'es e~pr"5s,.d', shown In Eq. 22. j
- al ng I e - 9 (C 1; C2; C3; Nz ; Hz S; Ar ;
K r; Xe; CO ) = Klhara potential, ergs
z
z Oepth ot Intermolecular
- binary - 32 (Cl-IC'! (10); Cl-Kr; potential weI I, ergs
CO z -C3 (11); Cl-Ar (2); 8
m1tl
Fraction of cagas type mt
Cl-C2; Cl-C3; C1-nC'!;
occupied by component I
Cl-CO z ; Cl-H z S;
Chemical potentials, cal/mol
C3-~ (3
z Number of cages type mt per
CONCLUSIONS
Sub.crlpt.
A new method tor predicting hydrate
formation has been develiped. Baeed on tha work
of Parrish and Prausnltz, this method combines o z Property at Ice point
several thermodynlmlc models In dsscrlblng J, I z Gas components
phlses. The hydrate phase Is modeled by ualng
the tharmostatlsticil ~dal conceived by van m z Cage type (1=smal I ;2=large)
der Waals Ind Platteeuw ;the gls phase, using z Structure type (1=1;2=11)
the Peng-ROblnson equltlon of stlte; Ind the
aqueous phlse With Inhibitor, using Mlrgules w Water
expressions, ?Wlth coefficients adjusted z Inhibitor
experimentally.
The method describes the behevlor of
multlcomponant hydrocarbon systems qUite REFERENCES
satlstactorlly, whether or not Inhibitors Ire
present. The excellent agreement With Hammerechlmldt, E.G.: -format'on of Gas
experimental data mikes the method In Hydratee In Natural Gas Tranpmlsslon
Important new tool In process design and In L1nes,- Ind. Ent/. C"-. 26 (1934'B51.
optimizing petroleum Industry operational
routines concerned with hydrlte formation. 2. van der Waals, J.H. and Platteeuw, J.C.:
-Clathrate So I uti ons, - Advan.. C,..... Phys. 2
(1959) 1. '
NOMENCLATURE
3. Gmeh I I ng, J. and Onken, U. :Vapor L(qu(d
Equ(l(brium Data Collection. DECHEMA
z Klhara core radius, i Chemistry Date Sarles (1977), v.l.
i
- Langmu I r constant, atm-
41. McKoy, V. end Sinenoglu, 0.: -Theory ot
FugaCity of component l or Dlssocatlon Pressures at Some Gas
In the gas mixture, Itm Hydrates,- J. C"-. Ph.ys. 38 (1963) 2946.
~, -
.......~."" ..
SPE 21 I 12 7
TABLE 7 - BICUDD FIELD DATI TABLE S - AVERAGE ERROR Of' THE HETHOO FOR
-_..-._-_.. --_._----, GASeOUS SYSTEI'IS WITHOUT INHIBITION
pnEBSURE (BARl '
r-------+----------.------ 5 YS TEMS ERROR
TEHPERATURE(oC) EXPER!MENHL i 'HIS WORK
I------+---~._- SiNGLE (9 ) '1,61'10
~======:=:=:======~=====1=~_:._:3_7__L 1:::~
r
9.2 17 .26
i
i
------,
18.57
I
BINARY (32)
HULTIC. (14\)
6,98'10
7,B7'Io
a b
FIG.Ol -UNIT CELL OF A HYDRATE OF STRUCTURE I (a) AND II ( b).
R'---------------------------,
GA~~~ON
(molar rrac~ion~
I
Cl - O.oot'lO
./
C2 - 0.0660
C3 - 0.0190
iC4
nCo/, -
*
111"
oo
AVERAGE ERROR
4.48 Yo
GAS COMPOS! TI ON
(molar fraclion)
3500
C1 - 0.8836
C2 - 0.0682
C3 - 0.0254
3000 nC4 - O.OO9Q
iC4 - 0.0033
05+ - 0.0101
r::::=::::J
1000
500
AVERAGE ERROR
15.35 ~
4000 .----------'------------~_',__---..,
GAS COMPOSI TI ON
(mol .... f ....clion)
C1 - 0.8401
C2 - 0.0647
C3 - 0.0357
ne4 - 0.0114
iC4 - O.OOQQ
05+ - 0.0078
Nz - 0.0064
..
_
EXPERIMENTAL
CALCULATED
...
1000
500
AVERAGE ERROR
5.01 "
GAS COHPOSI TI ON
(molar frac~ion)
*
175 C1 - 0.8413
ca - 0.0467
C3 - 0.0234
150 nC4 - 0.cog3
nCS - 0.cog3
N. - 0.0700
~:::::i 100
~
~ 75
50
25
AVERAGE ERI<OR
a.a3 "
0'-------.1.-----'------'-- '-- --'
265 270 275 280 285 290
1'P~(P"P1 TrrRP (V]
FIG. 05 -RYDHATB POtlMATIOII COIIDIl'IOIIB Fa- IIUL'l'ICOMPOllml'l' cas
MIXTURES WITH KE'l'HANOL (10\ wt.). DATA OF NG AND ROBINSON 11.
225 r-----------------------,
GAS CONPOSI TI ON
200 (molar frae~ion)
C1 - 0.71eo
ca - 0.0473
175 C3 - 0.01Q.4
nC4 - 0.0079
nCS - 0.0079
COz - 0.1419
Nz - 0.06Q6
75
*
50
25
AVERAGEERROR
.... 1 Q Y.