Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Check adequacy and stability of the falsework provision in constructing the concrete bridge
deck as shown in the figure below.
4000
.90 cm
450
Concrete Bridge Deck
1500
2.60 cm
1500
2.50 cm
HOROZONTAL LACING
6750
NG
CI
A
1500
BR
AL
2.40 cm
N
O
AG
DI
675010.50 cm
1500
2.60 cm
150
.40 cm
GROUND LEVEL
( 11 rows of scaffold tubes at 1.35 m c/c in the longitudinal direction under the
13.75 metres bridge span)
1
Suggested Solution
(a) Loading
Self-weights (i) scaffolding = 0.5kN/m2
(ii) formwork = 0.5kN/m2
Primary beams are 225 x 75 class SC3 timber at 1.25m centres. (Trial dimensions which
appear reasonable are selected at this stage.)
(c) Lacing
To allow for the effect of continuity of the primary beam on support reactions increase
the applied vertical load by 10%. To allow for the vertical loads induced by horizontal loads
increase the applied vertical loads by, say, 2%.
Estimate of total vertical load on standards = 13.75 x 1.12 = 15.4kN/m2
The tentative falsework arrangement (Transversely bay length of 1.25 m, lift height of 1.50
m and longitudinally at 1.35 m c/c) is satisfactory in terms of buckling for the vertical
standard under the expected vertical load. (If it is not Ok otherwise, improvement in the
layout should be done at this stage before any further detailed analysis)
Then the design could be proceeded with this preliminary falsework layout for the detailed
horizontal loading calculation, diagonal bracing, overall stability and foundation
calculations.
2
(d) Wind loading
For a sheltered site in, say Edinburgh of UK, (following the UK wind code)
falsework height = 6.75 m
basic wind speed, V = 50 m/s
topography factor, S1 =1
surface condition and height, S2 = 0.65
statistical factor (probability), S3 = 0.77
Design wind speed Vs = VS1 S2 S3 = 25m/s
Dynamic wind pressure, q (given by HK Wind Code: v 40.4 q ) =0.383 kN/m2
3
0.31 kN/m edge shutter
6.547 m
6.975 m
9.08 cm
1.52 kN/m scaffolding
7.77 cm
3.90 cm
3.173 m
Standard No. 1 2 3 4 5 6
V kN/m 0.63 10.813 17.188 17.188 10.813 0.63
4
(f) Horizontal forces
(g) Combine applied and induced vertical loads and compare actual and
estimated maximum loads on standards
5
Total Max. Leg Load = 25.847 kN, which is very close to
the initial estimated max. 25.99kN
1. 5
= angle to horizontal = tan-1 50.194
1. 25
2. 93
Check (ii) load on brace = 4. 57 kN
cos
1.5m
Check Buckling, the Effective Length = 2.34m , Max. Axial Load= 19 kN,
cos
which is > 4.57 kN, therefore O.K.
6
Longitudinal Row Diagonal Brace
1. 5
= tan-1 48. 01
1. 35
Total horizontal load = 1.93 kN per transverse row x 10 rows
1. 93x10
Number of diagonals = 4. 62 ( 5 used in arrangement )
6. 25 cos
(k) Foundations
A careful assessment of ground conditions and bearing capacity is essential in the first place
in falsework design when the preliminary layout of falsework is considered. This is
particularly so when it is proposed to concentrate vertical loads into towers.
For this example, assume the safe bearing pressure of 150kN/m2, the standards will have
base plates and the load will be spread to crossing sleepers, 300 mm(w)x150 mm(h), in
long lengths through sole plates (150x150 each), as detailed in the following Sketch.
Maximum load/standard = 25.847kN
25.847
Maximum bearing pressure = 115 kN / m 2 (Assume concentrated load
0.75 x0.3
spreading 1 : 2 from soleplate to sleeper), which is greater than 150kN/m2
This is satisfactory.
Leg Load
25.847 kN
150
Sleeper150
7
[300(B)x150(H)]
Sketch
Led Load spreading in the sleeper