Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
www.elsevier.com/locate/compstruct
Abstract
This paper deals with the stability analysis of curved woven tri-axial composite tow structures. A non-linear finite element
analysis is presented. Based on the continuum mechanics principles, the finite element updated Langrangian incremental formu-
lation for non-linear analysis is derived. Example problems are solved and comparison of the present results with the results
available in existing reference has been made. The effectiveness of the formulation and the validity of the corresponding computer
code are demonstrated. The buckling analysis of tri-axial composite straight beam and curved beam that is a part of woven fabric
tri-axial composite tow structures subjected to different boundary conditions is performed. In order to further confirm the accuracy
of the numerical solutions, approximate analytical solutions corresponding to the different structures have been derived. The
numerical results obtained are in very good agreement with the analytical solutions for the straight beam, curved beam and curved
beam structures. The effect of the resin on the curved woven tri-axial composite tow structures is also investigated.
2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
x3
x2
P P
o
x1
resin
x B3 and this connection is positioned at mid-lengths of the
C beams for the sake of symmetry. The initial configura-
B
PC tions of the beams follow half of a sine curve. This sit-
xC1 uation is not representative of the unit cell in Fig. 4, but
L it serves to give some insight into the interaction be-
tween two beams. The lateral load P0 is still used to
Fig. 2. Woven tri-axial tow structure with three intersected curved initiate the instability. The values of the axial loads for
tows. the two beams will be kept to be the same, that are PA
and PB .
The analysis of the tow structure consisting of three
maintained. The resin layer at the crossover of the tows curved beams as shown in Fig. 2 is conducted next. The
can be represented by bars. The ends of the tows are values of the axial loads, PA , PB and PC are kept to be
represented by pins at one end of the tow and by pin- equal and they are increased by the same increment each
on-rollers at the other end of the tow. The tows are time. The values of the three lateral loads P01 , P02 and P03
constrained at the ends such that the reaction forces at are also kept to be equal throughout.
the constraints are perpendicular to the orientation of The results of the more complicated investigations
the tows at these ends. Loads are applied along the will be presented in a series of articles. This paper pre-
directions of the center lines of the tows. sents the analytical formulation for the single curved
In order to arrive at the analysis of this structure, it is beam element and also the numerical analysis for a
necessary to analyze first simpler structures to build up single curved beam, and two intersected and three
the experience and the knowledge base. Also it would be intersected beam structures.
easier to check the results at different steps. The basic
unit in the unit cell is a curved beam with resin con-
nection with other beams at locations situated at 1/4 and
3/4 of its length. To model this beam, the analysis of a 2. Stability analysis of a single curved composite beam
curved beam as shown in Fig. 3 will be first conducted.
Lateral load P0 is applied to simulate the connection From the dimensions of a tow in a unit cell (0.2
with other beams, and also to provide the initial mm · 0.84 mm cross-section with length of about 9.16
imperfections for the instability analysis. The critical mm), the effective length of the basic unit cell of the
values of the axial load P will be determined. structure is much larger than its cross-sectional dimen-
Subsequently the analysis of two curved beams con- sions. Since the ratio of the dimension of the cross-sec-
nected with each other by a bar that represents the tion of a tow to its length is small, we can consider the
adhesive layer is conducted. This structure is shown in individual tow to behave like a beam when performing
Fig. 4. There is only one connection between two beams buckling analysis. These tows will be modeled as curved
D. Xu et al. / Composite Structures 67 (2005) 37–55 39
x 2 ,u 2 θ2 where
x1 ,u1 Vqik ¼ tþDt Vqik t Vqik ð5Þ
θ1
Vsik ¼ tþDt
Vsik t
Vsik ð6Þ
Fig. 6. Three-dimensional curved beam element. are the increments of unit directional vectors at node k
and can be obtained by using the following second-order
section dimensions can be specified by ak and bk and a approximations
set of vectors t Vkq , t Vks and t Vkr at a node k at time t
1
(where the left superscript t could also be 0 or t þ Dt, Vkq ¼ hk t Vkq þ hk ðhk t Vkq Þ ð7Þ
referring to time 0 or time t þ Dt, respectively. The same 2
notation will be employed in the following sections). The 1
Vks ¼ hk t Vks þ hk ðhk t Vks Þ ð8Þ
directions of t Vkq ; t Vks can be conveniently selected to be 2
the q; s directions at time t. In this case the Cartesian co- By substituting Eqs. (5)–(8) into Eq. (4), incremental
ordinates (x1 ; x2 ; x3 ) of a point P ðr; s; qÞ within the ele- displacements can be expressed as
ui ¼ tþDt ui t ui
X m
qX m
sX m
¼ hk uki þ ak hk ðhkiþ1 t Vqðiþ2Þ
k
hkiþ2 t Vqðiþ1Þ
k
Þþ bk hk ðhkiþ1 t Vsðiþ2Þ
k
hkiþ2 t Vsðiþ1Þ
k
Þ
k¼1
2 k¼1
2 k¼1
qX m
ak hk ðððhkiþ1 Þ2 þ ðhkiþ2 Þ2 Þ t Vqik hki hkiþ1 t Vqðiþ1Þ
k
hki hkiþ2 t Vqðiþ2Þ
k
Þ
4 k¼1
sX m
bk hk ðððhkiþ1 Þ2 þ ðhkiþ2 Þ2 Þ t Vsik hki hkiþ1 t Vsðiþ1Þ
k
hki hkiþ2 t Vsðiþ2Þ
k
Þ
4 k¼1
ment for a m-noded element at time t can be written as where i ¼ 1; 2; 3, and i þ 1 takes the value of 1 when i ¼
X 3 and i 1 takes the value of 3 when i ¼ 1; uLi , uNi are
m
qX m
sX m
t
xi ¼ hk t xki þ ak hk t Vqik þ bk hk t Vsik linear terms and non-linear terms specified by single
k¼1
2 k¼1 2 k¼1 underlining and double underlining in Eq. (9), respec-
i ¼ 1; 2; 3 ð2Þ tively.
horizontal plane, corresponding to egR2 gR2 and egR3 gR3 in Consider a general three-dimensional two-node bar of
local resin co-ordinate system shown in Fig. 10, should rectangular cross-section as shown in Fig. 10. Co-ordi-
be of small order of magnitude and will be neglected in nates gR1 ; gR2 ; gR3 represent the mapped local co-ordi-
the present case. nate system attached to the bar. The cross-sectional
Second, the shear strains, egR1 gR2 and egR1 gR3 , are neg- dimensions can be specified by aRk and bRk , which are the
ligible. This is because the shear deformations of the dimensions of the parallelogram, and a set of vectors
t k
tows in their local co-ordinate planes O1 y1 z1 and O2 y2 z2 VRq , t VkRs and t VkRr at a node k at time t. The Cartesian
corresponding to tow 1 and tow 2, respectively, are ne- co-ordinates (x1 ; x2 ; x3 ) of a point P ðr; s; qÞ within the
glected. These planes approximately are corresponding element for a m-noded element at time t can be written as
to the two local vertical co-ordinate planes, Og gR1 gR2 Xm
qX m
sX m
t
and Og gR1 gR3 , of the resin. Therefore, the shear strains, xi ¼ hk t xki þ aRk hk t VRqi
k
þ bRk hk t VRsi
k
i ¼ 1;2;3
2 k¼1 2 k¼1
egR1 gR2 and egR1 gR3 , may be of small order of magnitude k¼1
ηR 3
xR 3 x R 3 = bR / 2 (– aR / 2, bR / 2) (aR / 2, bR / 2)
x R 3 = 3 ( x R 2 + a R / 2) x R 3 = 3 ( x R 2 + a R / 2)
oR o
600 xR 2 ηR2
x R3 = – bR / 2 (– aR / 2,– bR / 2) (aR / 2,– bR / 2)
ui ¼ tþDt ui t ui Since only the strain along the thickness in xR1 direction
and shear strain in xR2 xR3 plane are considered, the
X m
qX m
sX m
strain vector in local co-ordinate system can be written
¼ hk uki þ k
aRk hk VRqi þ k
bRk hk VRsi ð23Þ
k¼1
2 k¼1
2 k¼1
as
where ^ t
eR11
e
t R ¼ ð33Þ
k 2 t eR23
VRqi ¼ tþDt VRqi
k
t VRqi
k
ð24Þ
k where the over-bar of the quantities corresponds to their
VRsi ¼ tþDt VRsi
k
t VRsi
k
ð25Þ
local values.
are the increments of unit directional vectors at node k Transformation matrix of strains from the global co-
and can be obtained by using the following first-order ordinate system into the mapped local co-ordinate sys-
approximations tem is given by
2 3
l211 l212 l213 l11 l12 l12 l13 l11 l13
6 l2 l222 l223 l21 l22 l22 l23 l21 l23 7
6 21 7
6 l2 l232 l233 l31 l32 l32 l33 l31 l33 7
Te ¼ 6 31
6 2l11 l12
7 ð34Þ
6 2l12 l22 2l13 l23 l12 l21 þ l11 l22 l13 l22 þ l12 l23 l13 l21 þ l11 l23 7
7
4 2l21 l31 2l22 l32 2l23 l33 l22 l31 þ l21 l32 l23 l32 þ l22 l33 l23 l31 þ l21 l33 5
2l11 l31 2l12 l32 2l13 l33 l12 l31 þ l11 l32 l13 l32 þ l12 l33 l13 l31 þ l11 l33
tþDt t t t
t SRij ¼ t CRijrs t eRrs ð31Þ ¼d W sij d t eij d VT sRij d t eRij d t VR
tV tV
T R
The incremental strain–displacement relation in the
ð37Þ
tensor form in global co-ordinate system is given by
where the subscript T of V denotes the volume of the
1 tow and R of V the volume of the resin. Substituting the
t eij ¼ ðt ui;j þ t uj;i Þ ð32Þ
2 stress–strain and strain–displacement relations and the
44 D. Xu et al. / Composite Structures 67 (2005) 37–55
displacement interpolation into Eq. (37), one can obtain where ds0 and ds are the undeformed and deformed
the formulation of iso-parametric finite elements. This lengths of elements on the reference line.
procedure has been presented in Bathe [8]. In order to Since
confirm the numerical results of Eq. (37), approximate
ðdsÞ2 ¼ ðdx1 þ du1 Þ2 þ ðdu3 Þ2
analytical solutions will be given first. ð40Þ
ðds0 Þ2 ¼ ðdx1 Þ2 þ ðdu30 Þ2
and are approximated to the second order by using
Taylor series expansion, one obtains
4. Approximate solutions for curved beam structures
8 2 2
>
> du1 1 du1 1 du3
< ds ¼ dx1 1 þ dx1 þ 2 dx1 þ 2 dx1
4.1. Simply-supported full sinusoidal beam 2 ð41Þ
>
> 1 1 1 du30
: ds0 ¼ dx1 1 2 dx1
Suppose that the curved beam takes the form of a full
sinusoidal beam that is simply-supported at both ends
Substituting Eq. (41) into Eq. (39) and considering that
under loads shown in Fig. 11. 1 2 3 2
ðdu Þ ðdu Þ , the reference plane extensional strain, e0 ,
Assume that the plane sections remain plane after dx1 dx1
bending; the effect of transverse shear is negligible; the can be further written in the following form:
loads and the bending moments act in a plane passing 2 2
du1 1 du3 1 du30
through a principal axis of inertia of the cross-section; e0 ¼ þ
dx1 2 dx1 2 dx1
the initial rise of the beam is not large as compared to 2 2 !
the cross-sectional dimensions; deflections are small as 1 du30 du1 1 du3
þ ð42Þ
compared to the cross-sectional dimensions; the mate- 2 dx1 dx1 2 dx1
rial points on the undeformed midline (mid-plane) are
characterized by u30 ðx1 Þ shown in Fig. 11. Let u1 ðx1 Þ and The general expression for the change in the curvature
u3 ðx1 Þ denote the location of material points on the de- of a curved beam, j, is given by
0 1
formed midline. On the basis of these assumptions, the 2 2
d u3 d u30
strain at any material point is given by B C
B dx21 dx21 C
j ¼ B 3 3 C ð43Þ
e ¼ e0 þ x03 j ð38Þ @ 2 2 2 2 A
1 þ du
dx1
3
1 þ dudx1
30
x3
q
x1
D Qi
Deformed configuration
u3 u3-u30
x3′
u30 D0 A Mj ML
Mo u1
P x1 x2′
( x1 , u30)
A
x1i A-A Section
Undeformed configuration
x1 j
L
and 2
d2 u3 d2 u30 d2 u3 du3
2 3
d2 u3 d2 u30 d2 u3 d2 u30 dx21 dx21 dx21 dx1
j2 ¼ 3
dx21 dx21 dx21 dx21 !!1
2 ! 2 2 !
d2 u3 du3
2
d2 u30 du30 d2 u30 du30 A 1þ1 du3
ð45Þ dx1
dx21 dx1 dx21 dx1 dx21 dx1 2 dx1
form
is the length of the reference line of the beam and the
finite element length ds
of the beam can be approxi- 0
Z L 2 2
mated as being accurate to the second order 1 @ EA du1 þ 1 du3 1 du30
UT ¼
qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi 2 ! 2 0 dx1 2 dx1 2 dx1
2 2 1 du3
ds ¼ ðdx1 Þ þ ðdu3 Þ dx1 1 þ ð49Þ
2 dx1 2 2 !!2
1 du30 du1 1 du3
þ
Substituting from Eq. (49), Eq. (48) can be written as 2 dx1 dx1 2 dx1
Z 2 !
1 L 1 du 3 2
U¼ ðEAe20 þ EIj2 Þ 1 þ dx1 ð50Þ d2 u3 d2 u30
d2 u3 d2 u30
2 0 2 dx1 þ EI 3
dx21 dx21
dx21 dx21
Work done by external forces is given by 1
2 2 !!
Z L X d2 u3 du3 d2 u30 du30
A
W ¼ qðu3 u30 Þ þ Qi dðx1 x1i Þðu3 u30 Þ dx21 dx1 dx21 dx1
0 i
X ! 2 !
du3 du30 1 du3
þ Mj gðx1 x1j Þ dx1 1þ dx1 Pu1 jL0 ð53Þ
j
dx1 dx1 2 dx1
"L
du3 du30 ""
M þ Pu1 jL0 ð51Þ Boundary conditions for a simply-supported beam are
dx1 dx1 "0
where dðx1 x1i Þ is the Dirac d-function and gðx1 x1j Þ u3 ð0Þ ¼ u3 ðLÞ ¼ 0; u003 ð0Þ ¼ u003 ðLÞ ¼ 0;
is the Doublet function. u1 ð0Þ ¼ 0 ðroller supportÞ ð54Þ
The total potential of the beam is given by
UT ¼ U W Assume that the initial configuration of the beam is
Substitution of Eqs. (42), (45) and (51) yields
2p
0 u30 ¼ Z sin x1 0 6 x1 6 L ð55Þ
Z 2 2 L
1 L@ du1 1 du3 1 du30
UT ¼ EA þ
2 0 dx1 2 dx1 2 dx1 where the Z is the initial rise parameter.
2 2 !!2 The deflection of the beam may be represented by an
1 du30 du1 1 du3 infinite sine series, each term of which satisfies the
þ
2 dx1 dx1 2 dx1 boundary conditions (54),
2 2 np
d u3 d2 u30 X
1
þ EI u3 ¼ u30 þ an sin x1 0 6 x1 6 L ð56Þ
dx21 dx21 L
n¼1
46 D. Xu et al. / Composite Structures 67 (2005) 37–55
Substituting all the assumed initial shapes, deflections As shown in Fig. 2, the total potential of unit cell is
and axial displacements into total potential expression, given by
using the same material properties and geometries for
UT ¼ UA þ UB þ UC þ UR W ð86Þ
the two beams but different initial rise parameters, i.e.
ZA and ZB , setting ZB ¼ ZA ¼ Z and performing the where UA ; UB ; UC are strain energies of beams AA, BB
same procedure of operation as in Section 4.1, one and CC, respectively. UA is given by
obtains the buckling loads as follows: Z
1 LA
UA ¼ ðEA AA e2A0 þ EA IA j2A Þ dx1 ð87Þ
Pcr 2 0
$ p %2
EI L UB and UC can be obtained simply by changing the
2 subscript A in Eq. (87) into B and C.
2 2 2
13 2 Z p2 Z 4 169 EA UR is the strain energy of the resin, which is given by
¼1 p þ Z4
60 L 8 L 1800 EI 2
1 aR bR L L
2 !2 U R ¼ ER DuA3 DuB3
13 2 Z 2 tR 4 4
þ 11 1 p 2
60 L 1 aR bR 3L 3L
3 þ ER DuC3 DuA3
2 ! ," 2 tR 4 4
143 EA 2 13 2 Z 5 13 EA 2 2
þ Z 1 p Z 1 aR bR 3L L
60 EI 60 L 60 EI þ ER DuB3 DuC3 ð88Þ
2 !# 2 tR 4 4
13 2 Z
þ5 1 p ð83Þ W is the work done by the external forces, which is given
60 L in the present case by
For accuracy to the second order of the initial rise, W ¼ PA uA1 ðLA Þ PB uB1 ðLB Þ PC uC1 ðLC Þ ð89Þ
buckling load in Eq. (83) can be approximated by
2 Boundary conditions:
Pcr 7 2 Z
$ %2 1 þ p ð84Þ Beam AA : DuA3 ð0Þ ¼ DuA3 ðLA Þ ¼ 0;
EI p 120 L
L
Du00A3 ð0Þ ¼ Du00A3 ðLA Þ ¼ 0; uA1 ð0Þ ¼ 0
If the beam is very flat and the initial rise has the ð90Þ
same order as the height of the cross-section of the
beam, the factor, EAZ 2 =EI, will not be a small quantity. Beam BB : DuB3 ð0Þ ¼ DuB3 ðLB Þ ¼ 0;
In this case the buckling load can be approximated by Du00B3 ð0Þ ¼ Du00B3 ðLB Þ ¼ 0; uB1 ð0Þ ¼ 0
2 ( " 2 ð91Þ
Pcr pZ 13 1 169 EAZ 2
$ %2 ¼ 1 þ þ Beam CC : DuC3 ð0Þ ¼ DuC3 ðLC Þ ¼ 0;
EI pL 2L 15 2 1800 EI
#, ) Du00C3 ð0Þ ¼ Du00C3 ðLC Þ ¼ 0; uC1 ð0Þ ¼ 0
143 EAZ 2 13 EAZ 2
þ 11 þ þ5 ð85Þ ð92Þ
60 EI 60 EI
Initial shape:
Substituting Z ¼ 0:133 mm and L ¼ 2:29 mm into Eqs.
2p
(83)–(85) in the present case, one obtains the unitless Beam AA : uA30 ¼ ZA sin xA1 0 6 xA1 6 LA
LA
buckling loads in these three cases, respectively, as fol-
lows ð93Þ
D. Xu et al. / Composite Structures 67 (2005) 37–55 49
2p 5. Buckling analysis of tri-axial woven fabric composite
Beam BB : uB30 ¼ ZB sin xB1 0 6 xB1 6 LB structures
LB
ð94Þ
Using the above formulation, the buckling behavior
of a few configurations of the curved composite beam
2p
Beam CC : uC30 ¼ ZC sin xC1 0 6 xC1 6 LC will be presented in the following. The material prop-
LC erties of the beam and resin used in the following cases
ð95Þ are given in Table 1:
Deflections: The geometric parameters of the tow are as
X
1 follows:
nA p
Beam AA: uA3 ¼ uA30 þ aAn sin xA1 06xA1 6LA Height of cross-section of tow, a ¼ 0:2 mm
n¼1
LA
Width of cross-section of tow, b ¼ 0:84 mm
ð96Þ The geometric parameters of the resin are
Width · Length · Thickness ¼ 0.87 · 0.87 · 0.067
X
1
nB p
Beam BB: uB3 ¼ uB30 þ aBn sin xB1 06 xB1 6 LB mm
n¼1
LB Transverse loads used in the following case,
ð97Þ P 0 ¼ 0:005 N.
X
1
nC p 5.1. Buckling loads of single isotropic arch beam with
Beam CC: uC3 ¼ uC30 þ aCn sin xC1 06xC1 6LC
LC clamped ends
n¼1
ð98Þ
The single isotropic circular arch beam is shown in
Axial displacement: Fig. 12. It is clamped at both ends with a single load at
the apex. The material of the arch is assumed to be
p isotropic and linearly elastic. The arch is idealized using
Beam AA: uA1 ¼ bA 1 cos xA1 0 6 xA1 6 LA
2LA eight equal curved beam elements. The maximum
ð99Þ deflection w is measured from the apex of the configu-
ration before loading.
p
Beam BB: uB1 ¼ bB 1 cos xB1 06 xB1 6 LB Geometry and material properties
2LB
of the beam are as follows:
ð100Þ
The radius of the arch, R ¼ 3381:1
mm (133.114 in.)
p
Beam CC: uC1 ¼ bC 1 cos xC1 0 6 xC1 6 LC Height of the cross-section, a ¼ 4:8
2LC
mm (3/16 in.)
ð101Þ Width of the cross-section,
Substituting all the assumed initial shapes, deflections b ¼ 25:4 mm (1.0 in.)
and axial displacements into total potential expression, Length of the arch, L ¼ 863:6 mm
using the same material properties and geometries for (34.0 in.)
the three beams but different initial parameters, i.e. ZA , Young’s modulus of elasticity,
ZB and ZC , setting ZC ¼ ZB ¼ ZA ¼ Z and performing E ¼ 68:95 GPa (107 lb/in2 .)
the same procedure of operation as in Section 1, one Poison’s ratio, m ¼ 0:2.
obtains the buckling load
Comparison of the results with the one given in Ref.
2 4
Pcr 376 2 Z 305 4 Z [7] is shown in Fig. 13. It can be seen that very good
¼1 p þ p ð102Þ agreement is obtained, proving the accuracy of the for-
p2 EI=L2 63 L 63 L
mulation and also of the computer program developed
Substituting Z ¼ 0:133 mm and L ¼ 4:58 mm into Eq. for the analysis.
(102) in the present case, one obtains
Pcr 5.2. Simply-supported straight beam made of tri-axial
¼ 0:9507 composite
p2 EI=L2
It is seen that nearly 5% of decrease for the critical load Simply-supported straight composite beam with a
with respect to the Euler critical load for single straight pair of static compressive loads at both ends and a small
beam case is predicted. lateral downward static load at the center is shown in
50 D. Xu et al. / Composite Structures 67 (2005) 37–55
Table 1
Material properties of tri-axial composite tow and resina
Material EL (GPa) ET (GPa) GLT (GPa) GTT (GPa) mLT
Composite tow 500.0 40.0 24.0 14.3 0.26
Resin 3.5 3.5 1.3 1.3 0.35
a
Subscript L denotes longitudinal; subscript T denotes transverse.
P
Node 7 10 13 16
4 19
1 4 5 22
3 6 24
2 7
1 8
Element w
R
Fig. 17. Load versus deflection curve for clamped straight tow.
Fig. 20. Deformed and undeformed shapes of simply-supported Fig. 22. Deformed and undeformed shapes of cantilever curved beam.
curved composite tow.
beam in finite element solution obeys the same law given larger deformation rate of the curved beam compared
by Eq. (64) if the buckling load is measured based on the with the cantilever straight beam case in Section 5.3 at a
straight beam buckling load. Next, from Figs. 15 and 19 certain amount of axial compressive load. We did not
we can see that the slope of the load versus maximum draw the curve together with the curves of other cases
deflection curve of a curved beam before buckling is less due to this reason. This further confirms the observa-
than the slope of the load versus maximum deflection tions made in Section 5.4.
curve of a straight beam before buckling. It means that Solving the eigenvalue problem, one obtains that the
curving the beam will increase the deforming rate of the non-linear finite element solution for the unitless buck-
beam before buckling and as a result, as we have ex- ling load of a cantilever single curved tow is
pected, the deformation of a curved beam will be larger Pcr =ðp2 EI=L2 Þ ¼ 0:2201. The ratio of the buckling load
than the deformation of a straight beam at the same for simply-supported curved beam to the one in the
amount of axial compressive load. Therefore, good present case is 4.17. It is very close to 4. It shows that the
agreement is thus confirmed. Euler buckling load relation between a simply-sup-
Deformed and undeformed shapes of simply-sup- ported beam and a cantilever beam also holds for the
ported single curved composite tow are shown in Fig. 20 present case. Deformed and undeformed shapes of
when load is equal to 120 N. cantilever single curved composite tow are shown in Fig.
22 when load is equal to 27 N. It may be noted here that
5.5. Cantilever curved tri-axial composite beam for the curved beam the original configuration is ori-
ented at an angle with respect to x1 -axis at both the fixed
Using the same beam configuration, the same mate- and free ends.
rial properties and the same finite element mesh, using
the clamped boundary condition at the left end of the
5.6. Simply-supported two intersected curved tri-axial
beam and free end condition at the other end and per-
composite tow structure
forming the non-linear analysis, one obtains the load
versus maximum deflection curve as shown in Fig. 21.
Simply supported curved tri-axial composite tow
We see from Fig. 21 a much larger deflection and much
structure with two pairs of static compressive loads
along the connection lines of corresponding supported
ends and a small lateral downward static load at the
apex is shown in Fig. 4. The structure is made of two
intersected curved composite tows at angle of 60, which
are bonded together by resin at the midpoints of each
tow. It is analyzed using four elements. The maximum
deflection w is measured from its central line corre-
sponding to its unloaded configuration. The dotted lines
in the figure constitute the x1 x2 plane of co-ordinate
system. The length of the beam is 2.29 mm. Geometries
of the structure are as follows:
The beam AA is in x1 x3 plane and the equation of its
central line is given by
$ %
x3 ¼ Z sin pL x1
ð104Þ
x2 ¼ 0
Fig. 21. Load versus maximum deflection curve for cantilever curved The beam BB is in xB1 xB3 plane, where xB3 is parallel
tow. to x3 -axis and xB1 is in ox1 x2 plane and is intersected with
D. Xu et al. / Composite Structures 67 (2005) 37–55 53
ox1 -axis at angle of 60, as shown in Fig. 4. The equation shear effect into consideration while the analytical
of central line of beam BB is as follows: approximate solution does not.
p In order to know the effect of the resin on the buck-
xB3 ¼ Z sin xB1 ð105Þ ling behavior of simply-supported two oppositely curved
L
tow structure, 10 times of variation, both increasing and
Load versus maximum deflection curve is plotted in Fig. decreasing, of Young’s modulus of resin is made.
23. The unitless buckling load obtained from the non- Buckling loads at different Young’s modulus values are
linear finite element solution in this case is Pcr =ðp2 EI= plotted in Fig. 24. From the figure one observes that
L2 Þ ¼ 0:9862. It is 6.86% larger than the single curved buckling load increases as the Young’s modulus be-
beam case and 2.22% larger than the single straight comes smaller and this is because smaller Young’s
beam case. It shows that the resin used for bonding two modulus leads to smaller stiffness of the resin as a bar,
oppositely curved tows may have the effect to resist correspondingly, the resin is deformed more easily. This
further deformation of the structure. The result obtained leads to further increase in curvature of each beam when
from the approximation solution given in Section 4.2 is loads are smaller. Note that each beam is curved along
1.01. It is 1% larger than the Euler buckling load in different directions. In order to make the two beams to
straight beam case. This further confirms the effect of buckle together, great effort needs to be exerted in order
the resin on resisting the deformation of the structure. to reverse the curvature of one beam. Therefore, larger
Comparing the two results, the non-linear finite element load P is needed to buckle the structure if the two beams
solution is seen to be 2.36% less than the approximate are to buckle on the same side, either up or down. For
solution. It is a very good agreement. The reason for the the case of stiff resin, the two tows are held together
difference between the two solutions is the shear effect of more rigidly. As such they tend to deform together at
the beams. Non-linear finite element solution takes the the initial low loads. That makes buckling easier. This
Fig. 23. Load versus maximum deflection curve of simply-supported Fig. 24. Buckling load for two-tow structure versus Young’s modulus
two intersected tow structure. of the resin.
PB PB PB
Deformed shapes
Deformed shapes Deformed shapes
P P P
PA PA PA
Undeformed configurations
Undeformed configurations Undeformed configurations
7. List of symbols
Notation
The following convention for tensor and vector sub-
scripts and superscripts is employed:
A left superscript denotes the time of the configura-
tion in which the quantity occurs.
A left subscript denotes the time of the configuration,
Fig. 26. Load versus maximum deflection curve of simply-supported in which the co-ordinate is measured with respect to
three intersected tow structure. which is differentiated, if the quantity considered is a
D. Xu et al. / Composite Structures 67 (2005) 37–55 55
t k tþDt k
derivative; otherwise the left subscript denotes the time xi ; xi Cartesian co-ordinate of nodal point k in con-
of the configuration in which the quantity is measured. figuration at time t and t þ Dt
0 t
Right lower case subscripts denote the components of t xi;j ; 0 xi;j derivative of co-ordinate in configuration at
a tensor or vector. Differentiation is denoted by a sub- time 0 and t with respect to co-ordinates 0 xj and
t
script following a comma, with the subscript indicating xj
t
the co-ordinate with respect to which is differentiated. 0 X deformation gradient of the configuration at
Right upper case subscript R corresponds to the re- time t referred to configuration at time 0
sin. d denoting variation
t
0 e ij component of Green–Lagrange strain tensor in
ak ; bk height and width of cross-sectional dimensions configuration at time t, referred to configura-
of the beam at nodal point k tion at time 0
t tþDt
0 C ijrs component of constitutive tensor at time t re- t eij component of Green–Lagrange strain tensor in
ferred to configuration at time 0 and t configuration at time t þ Dt, referred to config-
t Cijrs component of tangent constitutive tensor at uration at time t
time t referred to configuration at time t t eij component of strain increment Green–Lag-
t eij component of linear part of strain increment of range tensor referred to configuration at time t
configuration at time t t gij component of non-linear part of strain incre-
EL ; ET longitudinal and transverse Young’s moduli ment of configuration at time t.
0
GLT ; GTT longitudinal–transverse and transverse–trans- q; t q specific mass of body in configuration at time 0
verse shear moduli and t
t
hi finite element interpolation function associated sij component of Cauchy stress tensor in configu-
with nodal point k ration at time t matrices
P; P0 axial load and transverse load t
s Cauchy stress matrix and vector of in configu-
r; s; q natural element co-ordinates ration at time t
t
0 Sij component of second Piola–Kirchoff stress
tensor in configuration at time t referred to
configuration at time 0
tþDt References
t Sij component of second Piola–Kirchoff stress
tensor in configuration at time t þ Dt referred to
configuration at time t [1] Zhao Q, Hoa SV. Tri-axial woven fabric (TWF) composite with
open holes (Part I): Finite element models for composites.
t Sij component of second Piola–Kirchoff stress
J Compos Mater 2003;37(9):763–91.
increment at time t [2] Zhao Q, Hoa SV, Ouellette P. Tri-axial woven fabric (TWF)
t; t þ Dt time composite with open holes (Part II): Verification of the finite
t
ui ; tþDt ui component of displacement vector from initial element model. J Compos Mater 2003;37(10):849–75.
position at time 0 to configuration at time t and [3] Zhao Q, Hoa SV. Thermal deformation behavior of triaxial woven
fabric (TWF) composites with open holes. J Compos Mater
t þ Dt
2003;37(18):1629–49.
ui increment in displacement component, ui ¼ [4] Zhao Q, Hoa SV, Moudrik R. Finite element modeling of a
tDt
ui t ui membrane sector of an art em reflector. J Compos Mater, accepted
t k
ui displacement component of nodal point k in for publication.
configuration at time t [5] Zhao Q, Hoa SV, Ouellette P. Progressive failure of triaxial woven
fabric (TWF) composites with open holes. J Compos Struct, in
uki increment in t uki
press.
t i;j tþDt i;j derivative of displacement increment with
u ; u [6] Bathe KJ, Bolourchi S. Large displacement analysis of three-
respect to co-ordinate t xj and tþDt xj dimensional beam structure. Int J Numer Meth Eng 1979;14:961–
t
V ; tþDt V volume of body in configuration at time t and 86.
t þ Dt [7] Hu N, Hu B, Yan B, Funkunga H, Sekine H. Two kinds of
tþDt C 0 -type elements for buckling analysis of thin-walled curved
W external virtual work expression corresponding
beams. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng 1999;171(1–2):87–
to configuration at time t þ Dt 108.
t tþDt
x; x Cartesian co-ordinate in configuration at time t [8] Bathe KJ. Finite element procedures. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:
and t þ Dt Prentice Hall; 1996.