Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Tyler Griffin
Mr. Montero
Comp 1
Seat belts have been around for a while now and are in everyday use. There are pros and
cons to wearing a seat belt. Seat belts can save peoples lives. However, they can also have
adverse effects that could cause bodily harm and possibly end a persons life. Seat belts do more
good than harm because they save lives and prevent more devastating injuries.
Seat belts save lives and prevents injuries. Most deaths in vehicle wrecks are caused from
the injury sustained from the accident, and it is found that wearing a seat belt reduces injury .
Robertson says people are more likely to survive the crash because seat belts reduce vehicle
occupant deaths up to seventy to eighty percent Deaths occur only fifty percent less often
belted compared to non-belted vehicle occupants in crashes (Robertson 1). Now seat belt
regulations do have their part, but Elsevier writes that belt use rates for 19952000 for fatally
injured teenage drivers ranged from twenty percent (qtd Mcartt and Northrup). Four times as
many people die in car crashes due to not wearing their seat belts than wearing their seat belts.
This shows that people wearing their seat belts are safer than people not wearing their seat belts.
Additionally Robertson states that for total occupants wearing a seat belt that there forty percent
effectiveness in severe injury reduction (Robertson 2). Therefore, people are forty percent more
likely to not suffer from a severe injury if they would have been wearing their seat belts.
Griffin 2
On the other hand there are adverse effects of seatbelts. Isaac Aaron states that [ten]
percent of car occupants admitted to hospitals after frontal impact collisions show injuries
directly attributable to the wearing seat belts These include fracture of the clavicle, bruising
and fracture of the sternum and abdominal contusions (qtd Trinca and Dooley). On top of these
injuries, the seat belts are also known to cause intestional problems(chandler ethal). Additionally,
the adverse effects of wearing seat belts can cause trauma if not properly fitted even though they
are designed to prevent bodily harm from collision; they still can cause trauma to the spine that
is produced by severe flexion of the torso over the seat belt causing a tearing of the posterior
833-843). Another type of injury that is common in seat belt injuries is the chance fracture which
is [a] horizontal splitting and separation of the posterior vertebral arch, involving the pedicles,
lamina, transverse processes, and spinous process, with variations (American Journal of
Roentgenology pg. 833-843). Admittedly the seat belt does have its cons, but the cons that are
discussed above are only ten percent probable in a frontal collision and if the seat is not properly
worn or fitted. Wearing a seat belt is still the safer way to go. There are more pros than cons, and
the statics show that overall people are seventy to eighty percent safer wearing Their seat belt
Seat belts are safer; they do have a few disadvantages, but the good outweighs the bad.
Not wearing a seat belt is more fatal than wearing one. It is important to remember that statics
show that seventy to eighty percent of occupants in car crashes die because of not wearing their
seat belts. However, there is a concern that seat belts can possibly cause harm to the body such
Griffin 3
as tearing posterior elements and having severe flexion to the spine, but over all that does not
WORD CITED
Dehner, John R. Seatbelt Injuries Of The Spine And Abdomen. Abstract. American
doi:10.2214/ajr.111.4.833.
Robertson, L S. Estimates of motor vehicle seat belt effectiveness and use: implications
for occupant crash protection. American Journal of Public Health, vol. 66, no. 9, 1976,
Skld, Gran, and Gerhard E. Voigt. Spinal injuries in belt-Wearing car occupants killed
doi:10.1016/0020-1383(77)90011-0
Skld, Gran, and Gerhard E. Voigt. Spinal injuries in belt-Wearing car occupants killed
1383(77)90011-0
Griffin 5