(Real- Student Rubric story Participation Assignments counted Group- not Comments counted towards final Score (group) grade) towards final grade)
1 1s group said that there were some
4 management problems and goofing off in their 18/20 4 3 8 4/5 group, however they were able to problem solve. (3) Overall, I believe that Jordan was able to put in a good effort towards the tall tale performance.
2 5 2s group noted that he was always involved with
18/20 2 4 8 5/5 the task at hand and was a great asset to the (4) group! He loved his part!
3 (Reads 3s group said that he made great suggestions
and knew his part well. I believe that 3 did a great with Mrs. 5 job remaining involved even though he wasnt 13/16 2 3 4/5 O.) (4) able to practice with them all the time. 4/4
4 4s group said that she worked well with the
4 others and she gave a good input/effort to make 17/20 2 3 8 4/5 the story a great tall tale! She did a great job, but (4) could have compromised with her group more often.
5 5s group agreed that she helped to add a lot of
4 exaggeration to the story. She put a good effort 19/20 3 4 8 4/5 into making the performance the best it could be! (4) She was always trying to find a way to help!
6 6s group agreed that when helped he had good
3 suggestions, but he mostly followed the 17/20 3 4 8 3/5 directions he was given. Therefore, he was not (2) adding to the group's ideas. He did practice well and follow directions.
7 7 helped his group members understand
confusion, and tried to resolve conflict. His group 19/20 4 4 8 4 4/5 also agreed that he gave some helpful suggestions to improve the quality of the tall tale (3) performance.
8 8 did a great job taking her group members
4 suggestions. She was easy for her group 17/20 3 3 8 4/5 members to get along with. She followed (3) instruction, however did not contribute her own ideas to the performance.
9 9 was very excited to work on his tall tale with the
group. He had a lot of input for the group, 4 however, sometimes some of his ideas did not 17/20 3 3 8 4/5 seem to be appropriate for the task at hand. A (3) little more focus on the overall idea of the project would have been great for 9.
10 4 According to her group, 10 was a good problem
17/20 2 3 8 4/5 solver and was a big help to the group. She (4) goofed/spaced out a little, but for the most part helped the overall performance.
11 11s group agreed that he goofed off quite a bit.
3 However, he gave good ideas to the group and 17/20 2 4 8 3/5 got along well with everyone. He was a great (3) asset to the group, but could have focused a bit more like the rest of his group.
12 12 was a good group participant. He helped out
4 when he was needed, however, he tended to 19/20 3 4 8 4/5 goof off at times and get distracted (according to (4) his group)
13 13s group agreed that he was a great group
4 participant and contributed a lot of different ideas. 19/20 4 4 8 4/5 However, the group said that he had a hard time (3) when things did not go his way.
14 5 14s group agreed that she played a great
18/20 2 4 8 5/5 leadership role in her group. She gave great (4) contributions to the presentation and helped a lot.
15 15s group agreed that he was a good sport and
was easy to get along with. He participated when 19/20 4 4 8 4 4/5 he was supposed to and contributed good ideas. However, there were times when he tended to (3) get distracted/goofed off.
16 16s group agreed that he was
3 distant/daydreamed for a lot of the group work 16/20 4 2 8 3/5 time. I noticed this, as well, when observing the (2) group work. He did practice and do his part, but did not contribute many ideas.
17 17s group agreed that she was a good group
5 member. She stayed on task and helped out 19/20 3 4 8 4/5 when/where she was needed. She even typed (4) out the script with she was at home for homework.