Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
CATEGORIES
Daily Sabah
Heidegger himself had his own share of the 'crooked timber of humanity,'
to use Kant's phrase, when he flirted with Nazism in the 1930s. He
supported the Nazis with the belief that they would overcome both Soviet
communism and American capitalism, and initiate a third path for the
German nation. He saw Europe squeezed between Russia and America,
both of which were based on "the same dreary technological frenzy, the
same unrestricted organization of the average man."
Germany was supposed to offer something new. But things did not turn
out as Heidegger had hoped. The Holocaust shocked the world. Instead
of empowering the German nation, the Nazis came close to destroying it.
Heidegger rejected the idea of treating Being as a "thing," and turning it
into an "entity." Such a view leads to the commodification of Being, and
reduces the reality of things to their use-value. We have to accept things
as they are before we put them to use.
1 of 3 12/1/2017, 11:04 AM
Heidegger, Mulla Sadra and the Path to Home - brahim Kaln - Daily Sabah https://www.dailysabah.com/columns/ibrahim-kalin/2014/08/15/heidegg...
For instance, the carpenter has to work on the wood, his basic material,
with the kind of knowledge, competence and care that is needed to carve
something with shape, beauty and function. The painter has to give color,
light, paper, brush, et cetera their "due" in order to paint something
meaningful and beautiful. We have to treat Being with a similar attitude.
Enslaving Being for our own wishes is a ticket to destroying both Being
and ourselves. This requires putting Being before utility, use-value,
mechanization, profitability and instrumentalization. Otherwise, we
degrade existence, and turn ourselves into homeless subjects set against a
rootless world.
Heidegger spoke of the 'path' without saying much about the destination.
He spoke of Being as man's home, but fell short of overcoming the
tautological homo-centrism it involves. Mulla Sadra, too, spoke of the
journey, but underlined that all paths lead to an end. He saw the path as
having a 'beginning' (mabda') and an 'end' (ma'ad). Walking on the path
alone cannot be an end itself, he said. One always walks towards a
destination. That destination cannot be our own making. Otherwise
everything becomes a self-centered construction. One needs to connect
with a higher reality that cannot be monopolized by a self-deceiving ego.
2 of 3 12/1/2017, 11:04 AM
Heidegger, Mulla Sadra and the Path to Home - brahim Kaln - Daily Sabah https://www.dailysabah.com/columns/ibrahim-kalin/2014/08/15/heidegg...
repose.
3 of 3 12/1/2017, 11:04 AM