I

(a) It depends. The marriage is VOIDABLE in case there was concealment of STD, regardless of its nature,
existing at the time of the marriage (Art. 46(3)). It is VALID when the other party afterwards, with full
knowledge of the facts constituting fraud, freely cohabited with the other as husband and wife (Art.
45(3)).

(b) The marriage is VOID from the beginning for reasons of public policy. Under Art. 39(9) of the Family
Code, the marriage is void between parties where one, with the intent to marry the other, killed that
other person's spouse or his/her own spouse.

(c) Their marriage is VOID due to failure to secure first a declaration of presumptive death of the spouse
prior to their marriage.

(d) Their marriage is VOID due to failure to comply with Art. 53 in relation to Art. 52 of the Family Code.
Under Art. 53, either of the former spouses may marry again after complying with the requirements
under Art. 52, otherwise, the subsequent marriage shall be null and void. Art. 52 states that: "the
judgment of annulment or absolute nullity of the marriage, the partition and distribution of the
properties of the spouses, and the delivery of the children's presumptive legitimes shall be recorded in
the appropriate civil registry and registries of property.

(e) Their marriage is VALID. Their marriage falls under the exception provided under Art. 34 of the
Family Code. Under Art. 34, "no license shall be necessary for the marriage of a man and a woman who
have lived together as husband and wife for at least 5 years and without legal impediment to marry
each other."

II

The legal consequences is that both lands are alienable and disposable and might convert into private
ownership.
B. Yes, 30 years of occupation is equevalent to title
C. No, timberland is not within the purview of prescription