Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
UWRT 1104
31 October 2017
Animal Testing
environment will affect a specific type of animal. To predict different safety variables
and effectiveness for products, animals have traditionally been involved in the
testing. More than one hundred million different kinds of animals are killed in different
laboratories each year and most people do not even know about it. Is there not a better
way to conduct research on products and chemicals that does not harm animals or
humans? In fact, scientists have developed many new testing methods that have shown
The idea of testing on animals has been used throughout decades, originally during
the age of Aristotle. It has not been a major problem until a few years ago. Lots of
biomedical research has been put under severe criticism from animal protection and
animal rights groups. Laws have been passed in several countries to make the practice
more humane. Debates on the ethics of animal testing have greatly increased since the
seventeenth century. Those against, agree that the benefit to humans does not justify the
harm to animals. Many people also believe that animals are inferior to humans and very
that this product might have been tested on animals. Little did they know, if this said
product was tested on animals, the testing conducted could be harmful to animals,
whether it takes their lives or not. Animal testing can cause the animal physical pain and
it can cause them psychological distress. It is said that 50 percent of adults in the United
states oppose animal testing. The other 50 percent believes that it is necessary for
medical progression. There are alternative methods to animal testing that people need to
consider.
Some benefits of alternative methods are that scientific methods are often more
reliable than testing on animals, non-animal testing is cost efficient, more predictive,
One type of alternative method to animal testing is in vitro testing, which means
test tube testing. This type of testing uses methods and models based on human cell
tissue and culture. In-vitro testing is used to test new chemicals and products on human
skin, it is toxicology testing. Scientist take tissue samples from either animals or humans
and prepare them for laboratory study. The main limitation to in in-vitro testing is that it
limits the result to a cellular level and cannot replace whole-body testing.
This type of testing is used for automobile crash testing, heart studies, and modeling the
effects of new medicines. This is a method that uses virtual metabolism programs,
human organs, and other math based and computer based approaches to study the human
body structure, fractions, and reactions. The only limitation is that these simulations
where humans are given very low quantities of a drug to test the effects of the drug on a
cellular level. This method allows humans to be safely substitute in some drug testing.
Microdosing gives humans a high enough dose of a drug to cause cellular effects but too
low of a dosage to effect the entire body. The only limitation of this method is that it is
considered the earliest phase of the clinical drug trial, this is know known as phase
0. Animal testing with the full dose of the drug is necessary to determine its safety and
Another alternative form of animal testing is microfluidic chip testing. This type
metabolism. Microfluidic chips contain samples of tissues from different parts of the
body that are linked by microchannels through which a blood substitute flows, mimicking
processes and pathways in the body. Compared to in vitro testing, this method provides
a wide range of technologies used for seeing inside the body. This includes magnetic
observe the effects of drugs in the body, studying brain function and structure, and
studying brain and other neurological disorders. The limitations of this type of testing
All of the alternative methods stated above can and will help to stop the use of
animal testing in labs. The only problem is there are two sides to this. There is a side
that will continue using animals as test subjects. There is also a side that is against the
usage of animals as test subjects, the animal protection groups like PETA. What needs to
happen for these methods to become the new standard for animal testing is for scientists
to abide by the new methods. Also, these methods will require scientists to become more
affiliated with the change. Scientists are currently used to testing on animals without a
problem. If scientists start using these new methods, it would take more time to test
products because they would be required to learn how to properly and professionally use
these methods.
In conclusion, animal testing is used all around the world. It is not likely that
animal testing will come to a complete stop in the next few years. It will take a long time
before animal testing is completely obliterated but with all of the new methods being
Sources: http://www.neavs.org/alternatives/in-testing
http://animalresearch.thehastingscenter.org/facts-sheets/alternatives-to-animals/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3123518/