Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Greetings,
As a historian and an expert on the Cold war arms race, you are invited to participate in our
televised interview along with several other experts. Please prepare for the interview with the
following questions: how did the US government use fear to get the public to allow nuclear arms
buildup? How real was the threat of nuclear war? Was the nuclear bomb more of a political tool
than a real threat?
Instructions:
Day 1: Research
Students will work collaboratively in groups of four or five. Students will be given primary
sources (us politicians and USSR), websites and videos to gain factual knowledge (please see
below for sources). The students will then pick a representative from each group to serve as an
expert historian in a panel interview. Students will use the analysis handout to organize their
information. Students will conduct research as a team. Please download the analysis guide from
the teachers website (https://www.weebly.com/weebly/main.php)
Day 2: Interview
The teacher will facilitate a panel interview on the Arms race and how it affected the US public
and policy. Each group will chose a member for the panel. The students will chose the position
they want to argue based on the questions and their research. If all students are in agreeance, the
teacher will assign specific students to play the opposing view. The driving questions for the
panel interview are how did the US government use fear to get the public to allow nuclear arms
buildup? How real was the threat of nuclear war? Was the nuclear bomb more of a political tool
than a real threat? Student must reference the documents, videos, and other sources they found in
their argument. The student in the panel interview must also call on group members as experts
to solidify their position.
Each group member will grade each other using the rubric provided (see teacher website @
https://www.weebly.com/weebly/main.php). The assignment is worth 100 points.
Rubric for Classroom Discussion
weight
Criteria Exemplary Effective Minimal Unsatisfactory