0 évaluation0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
48 vues2 pages
This rubric outlines the criteria for critically analyzing an article. It evaluates summaries, analysis of the article's arguments and use of evidence, synthesis with other views, and evaluation of the article and other views. Excellent performance is given to those that clearly summarize the main points and all reasons, provide an in-depth analysis identifying rhetorical devices and evidence used, integrate at least three other views and connecting them to the article, and provide a strong assessment of the quality of the article and other views strengths and weaknesses.
This rubric outlines the criteria for critically analyzing an article. It evaluates summaries, analysis of the article's arguments and use of evidence, synthesis with other views, and evaluation of the article and other views. Excellent performance is given to those that clearly summarize the main points and all reasons, provide an in-depth analysis identifying rhetorical devices and evidence used, integrate at least three other views and connecting them to the article, and provide a strong assessment of the quality of the article and other views strengths and weaknesses.
This rubric outlines the criteria for critically analyzing an article. It evaluates summaries, analysis of the article's arguments and use of evidence, synthesis with other views, and evaluation of the article and other views. Excellent performance is given to those that clearly summarize the main points and all reasons, provide an in-depth analysis identifying rhetorical devices and evidence used, integrate at least three other views and connecting them to the article, and provide a strong assessment of the quality of the article and other views strengths and weaknesses.
Criteria Excellent >85% Good 70-84% Fair 50-69% Poor <50%
Summary The writers The writers Part of the The writers position (8) position and all position and most writers and reasons are not reasons are clearly reasons (all except position is clearly and concisely and concisely one) are clearly stated. All captured in the captured in the and concisely reasons are summarizers own summarizers own captured in the clearly and words or they not words summarizers own concisely stated at all words captured in the summarizers own words 7-8 5-6 3-4 0 -1 Analysis An excellent A good analysis Covers at least Covers less than half (16) analysis of the that covers most half of the of the salient points argument i.e. of the salient salient points related to rhetorical identifies and points regarding related to appeals and the comments on the rhetorical appeals rhetorical writers use of relevant rhetorical and the writers appeals and the evidence or none at appeals and the use of evidence writers use of all writers use of evidence evidence 13-16 9-12 5-8 0-4 Synthesis Integrates at least Integrates three Integrates two Mentions only one (16) three other views other views on other views on other view on the on issue and issue and issue but their issue. The discussion establishes their establishes some connection may or may not connection with the connections with with the ideas establish the article being the original in the original connection between analyzed article. Some article is not the view and the connections may clear original article not be clear No other views integrated. 13-16 9-12 5-8 0-4 Evaluation Assesses both the Assesses both the Some attempt There is little to offer (12) quality of the quality of the to identify the in terms of evaluating original article and original article strengths and the arguments all of others in the and most of the weakness but synthesis and others in the mostly by identifies strengths synthesis and listing and weaknesses. identifies strengths and weaknesses 10-16 6-9 3-5 0-2 Grammar/ Summarizers Summarizers Summarizers Poor structure and Organizati structures are clear, structures are structures are presence of many on/Style information is well clear and well clear and well errors that distract (8) presented and there presented but presented but from meaning is an absence of there are there are errors occasional errors occasional that do not errors that significantly obscure obscure meaning meaning 7-8 5-6 3-4 0 -1