Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
RWS 1302-17424
October 6, 2017
Question:
Can the benefits of genetically modified foods change or support someones ethical standpoint
on the matter?
Dizon, F., Costa, S., Rock, C., Harris, A., Husk, C., & Mei, J. (2015). Genetically Modified
(GM) Foods and Ethical Eating. Journal of Food Science, 81(2). doi:10.1111/1750-
3841.13191
The article, Genetically Modified (GM) Foods and Ethical Eating was written by a team
of scientists, doctors, and nutritionists. To appeal to the emotions of the reader the authors state
that there is a rising issue of weighing the disadvantages of genetically modified foods against
the benefits, especially since genetically modified foods have the potential to help developing
nations in need of economic stimulation and food security. If such benefits do exist, the
responsible use of genetically modified foods should be employed. By stating this there are
effectively saying that there is a way to positively impact malnutrition in developing nations
which could save hundreds of thousands of lives (Dizon and others, 2015). They go on to
explain the science of splicing the genes of plants and combining them with trace amounts of
viruses in order to make them more resistant to diseases. This article does not address my
question directly but it is informing the reader which in turn could end up persuading them.
Ronald, P. (Director). (2015, May 4). Pamela Ronald: The case for engineering our food [Video
file]. Retrieved September 22, 2017, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wZ2TF8-
PGQ4&t=356s
This video is pushing for the use of genetically engineered foods from and ethical
standpoint. In the video, Pamela Ronald touches on the sensitive subject of children in under
developed countries suffering from malnutrition. Particularly, the 5000 children who go blind
due to vitamin A deficiency, from which more that half will die. She then goes on to explain
how scientist where able to genetically engineer a type of rice to produce -carotene (Ronald,
2015). The fact that genetically engineering rice has the ability to prevent thousands of children
from going blind and possibly saving their lives would appeal to the emotions of many people.
Pamela Ronald also talks about the science behind genetically engineering foods. She explains
how while rice can grow while submerged in water, if it is submerged for to long that it will die.
One of her colleagues and his graduate student were studying an ancient variety of rice while had
the ability to be submerged for to weeks and still grow. They were able to isolate this gene and
when submerged in water this variety of rice grew three time more than the conventional kind.
This video does not address my question directly but is providing information on the topic of
genetically modified foods in order to try and persuade the viewer into agreeing with the use of
though before they are deemed to be safe for the public. The article then goes on to list a sizable
list of advantages and concerns with genetically modified foods. They go on to list their
recommendation on moving forward with the use of genetically modified organisms. They state
that there should be labels clearly stating that the product is genetically modified and that all
genetically modified foods should be reviewed by a independent national regulatory board. This
article doesnt address my question directly but explains the process that GMOs must go through
before being approved for public use. By doing this is may bring some comfort in the fact that
not everything can be released to the public without proper testing to make sure the product is
safe.
This video goes into depth on the subject of Golden Rice. Golden rice is a that produces
carotene. The speaker of the video, Dr. Gerard Berry talks about the millions of people with
Vitamin A deficiency due to poor diet. Symptoms of Vitamin A deficiency first show up as
tissue damage which can result in blindness and can also affect the immune system which leaves
the person susceptible to other diseases. He states that one cup of golden rice could account for
up to 50% of the daily need of Vitamin A. This video may influence somebodies view by
appealing to their emotions because it explains how genetically modified foods has the potential
Zhou, D., Wang, C., Li, Z., Chen, Y., Gao, S., Guo, J., . . . Que, Y. (2016). Detection
of BarTransgenic Sugarcane with a Rapid and Visual Loop-Mediated Isothermal
Amplification Assay. Retrieved October 08, 2017, from
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4782128/
This article goes into the science behind genetically modifying foods, specifically sugar
cane. It describes how genetically modifying the sugar cane would increase production as well
as insect and disease resistance. They also explain that genetically modifying the sugarcane can
make it more resistant to herbicides which would combat a huge problem in growing the plants,
weeds. This article just furthers the argument of how genetically modifying foods can bring
countless benefits to the human population. By explaining this to people, the article has the
ability to sway the opinion of the public to agreeing with the use of genetically modified foods.
This article does not directly address the question but pushes to persuaded the public by
Wong, H. W., Liu, Q., & Sun, S. S. (2015). Biofortification of rice with lysine using endogenous
histones. Retrieved October 08, 2017, from
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4302240/
This article explains how rice is the most consumed grain in the world, but is deficient in
essential nutrients. It then goes on to explain that this causes a major problem for the people in
developing nations who rely on rice as their main source of nutrition. To combat this problem
two proteins were over-expressed in rice seeds to achieve lysine biofortification (Wong and
others, 2014). By explaining that foods can be genetically modified to increase the nutrient levels
of rice, the opinion of the public may to altered to accept genetically modified foods. This article
doesnt directly address my question but would help me by providing information that is positive
This article goes into how rice can be a causative of allergens. It goes on to explain The
-amylase/trypsin inhibitors (1416 kDa), -globulin (26 kDa) and -glyoxalase I (33 kDa) are
regarded as major potential allergens of rice (Oryza sativa L.) seed based on specific recognition
by serum IgE from allergy patients. In order to suppress the production of these major allergens
in rice grains, a mutant in the Koshihikari background lacking the 26 kDa allergen (GbN-1)
was used as a host for RNA silencing. A binary vector harboring two RNA interference (RNAi)
gene cassettes for suppression of 1416 kDa and 33 kDa allergens driven by the 13 kDa and 10
kDa prolamin endosperm-specific promoters, respectively, was introduced into the GbN-1
how something as simple as genetically modifying rice to not be a causative of allergens could
genetically modifying foods. It would be so beneficial to people who are living in developing
countries who may gave an allergy which doesnt allow them to consume rice since it is a cheap