FORMATION EVALUATION

Lesson 1
_______
INTRODUCTION

Sept-Dec 2017

Notes modified from Dr. Jerry L. Jensen

 COURSE RESOURCES - 1
Computer resources
Service company websites
www.slb.com/Hub/
www.halliburton.com/hes/
www.bakerhughes.com/bakeratlas/
Log interpretation software
Log Preview (Schlumberger)
 COURSE RESOURCES - 2
Literature
Books
1. Dresser Atlas, Log Interpretation Fundamentals.
2. Dewan, John T., Log Interpretation & Applications.
3. Serra O, Fundamental of Well Log Interpretation.
4. Darling T, Well Logging & Formation Evaluation.
5. Schlumberger, 1989. Log Interpretation Principle/ Applications
Logs
Course handouts
Additional books
1. Dewan, John T. 1983, Geophysical Well Log. Penn Well Books.
Tusla
2. Donald.P. Helander, 1983. Formation Evaluation, OGCI
International, Tulsa
3. Harsono A, 1997. Evaluasi Formasi & Aplikasi Log, Schlumberger
Oil Field Services, Jakarta
4. Pirson, Sylvan J, 1963. Handbook of Well Log Analysis: For oil
and Gas Formation Evaluation, New Jersey
 COURSE OBJECTIVES

1. List and describe basic physics of standard

open-hole logging tools

2. Interpret standard measurements in clean

formations for lithology, , and Sw

3. Estimate and Sw in shale sands

4. Apply basic integration of log and core data

 LABS

Short test
Homework
Due Friday
Returned and discussed in lab
Software demonstrations
Questions/problems discussed
GRADING
Homework 20%
Midterm & Report 35%
Quizzes 15%
Final 30%

A = 90 100%
B = 80 89.9
C = 70 79.9
D = 60 69.9
F < 60
 GUIDELINES
Classes
Pay attention
Computer off
Ask questions
Read the book
Labs
Opportunity to discuss problems
Review work
Report
Early start
Back up files
Printers are fickle
INTRODUCTION - WHAT IS LOGGING?

In situ meas. (vs. depth) of

Rock properties
Fluid properties
When
Openhole (before casing)
While drilling (LWD / MWD) Casing
After drilling (wireline)
Cased hole
Interpretation for
Geological properties Open hole
Petrophysical properties
Production properties

Baker-Atlas
 VALUE AND LIMITATIONS
OF WELL LOG DATA

Strengths
Provides remotely sensed values of reservoir
properties and fluids
Among the most abundant reservoir data
Presentation results fairly well standardized
Allows evaluation of lateral (map) and vertical
(cross section) changes in reservoir properties
and fluids

Limitations
Indirect measurements
Vertical resolution
Depth of investigation
 A FEW SIGNIFICANT MILESTONES
IN PETROLEUM EXPLORATION
First oil well E. L. Drake, Titusville, PA, 1859

Anticlinal trap theory I.C. White (popularized) 1885

Geophysical tools (magnetic, gravity, seismic evaluation) 1911

Geophysical well logging Schlumberger, 9/5/27

Depositional systems analysis Fisher, Brown and others (UT) , 1960s

Sequence stratigraphy (Mitchell, Vail et al., Exxon; Fisher, et al., UT), 1970s

3-D Seismic, computers, 1980s

4-D (time-lapse) seismic; seismic attributes, computers 1990s

Frontiers multicomponent and spectral seismic imaging of reservoir

and fluids, computers
SURFACE ELECTRICAL MEASUREMENTS
CONRAD SCHLUMBERGERS ASSISTANT, 1914
From Schlumberger

(SEE NOTES)
 From Schlumberger

EARLY SURFACE
GEOPHYSICS

Resistivity map
made by C. Schlumberger, 1912
 DIEFFENBACH
NO. 2907, RIG 7

Pechelbronn, France

First well logged with

Geophysical tools

_______

September 5, 1927

From Schlumberger
 145 m
SEGMENT OF THE
150 m FIRST WELL LOG
Schlumberger
155 m

160 m

165 m

170 m

175 m

155 m

180 m See notes

From Schlumberger
SEGMENT OF THE FIRST WELL LOG Schlumberger

215 m

220 m

225 m

From Schlumberger
SEGMENT OF THE FIRST WELL LOG Schlumberger

From Schlumberger
HEADER FIRST WELL LOG
Schlumberger, 1927

From Schlumberger
From Schlumberger
HENRI DOLL LOGGING OKLAHOMA
WELL, 1930

From Schlumberger
ANOTHER FUN DAY IN THE OIL PATCH

From Schlumberger
OPEN HOLE LOGGING MEASUREMENTS

Passive
Caliper
Gamma Ray
Spontaneous
Potential (SP)
Active
Acoustic

LOGGING TOOL
- tc, ts, Ac, As
Nuclear
- b, N, Pe, 1, 2
Electromagnetic
- R, tPL, EATT
CASED HOLE LOGGING MEASUREMENTS

Passive
Gamma Ray
Temperature
Flow Velocity
Caliper
Active
Acoustic
Nuclear
Electromagnetic
Mechanical
 SOME QUESTIONS ADDRESSED BY
LOG INTERPRETATION
Geophysicist / Geologist
Are the tops as predicted?
Are potential zones porous?
Formation intervals?
Lithology?
Hydrocarbons?
What type of hydrocarbons?
Commercial quantities?
Drilling Engineer
Hole volume for cementing?
Any keyseats or doglegs?
Packer placement for testing?
Best place to set a whipstock?
Reservoir Engineer
How thick is the pay zone?
How homogeneous is the
zone?
Porosity?
Permeability?
Production Engineer
Which zone(s) to complete?
What production rates?
Any water production?
Is zone hydraulically isolated?
Will well need stimulation?
What stimulation would be
best?
WHAT DOES AN OPEN HOLE LOG COST?
IT DEPENDS ON...

Well type
Vertical/Deviated
Deep/Shallow
Hot/Normal
Measurements
Depth charge
Survey charge
Time / location / special procedures
Land/offshore
Service charge
Equipment availability
Rig time
Wireline/LWD
TYPICAL OPEN HOLE WIRELINE COSTS

Land Offshore
Service Charge $1-3K $6-10K

Depth Charge 30-50 50-100

(per msmt-foot)

Survey Charge 30-50 50-100

$12-25K/day jack-up
Rig Time $4K/day $100K+/day floater
 EXAMPLE LOGGING JOB COSTS

DIL+BHC+GR DIL+BHC+GR
Land well Offshore well
Logged interval 8-10K ft. Logged interval 8-10K ft.

Service Chg $1,500 Service Chg $6,000

Depth Chg 11,500 Depth Chg 22,000
10,000x(40+40+30) 10,000x(80+80+60)
Survey Chg 2,300 Survey Chg 4,400
2,000x(40+40+30) 2,000x(80+80+60)
Rig time 3 hrs 500 Rig time 3 hrs 2,300
TOTAL $15,800 TOTAL $34,700
FACTORS ADDING TO LOGGING COSTS

Hostile well conditions Double+

Deviated more than 60deg
Hotter than 300 deg F
LWD/MWD Triple++
Local conditions
Crew on standby
Remote location
LOGGING IS COMPARITIVELY INEXPENSIVE!
Vertical Land Well Costs

Misc.
Mud
7%
Trouble 20%
15%

Wireline
Logging
8% Rig Time
25%
Steel
25%

Total cost to drill a well: $75 to $200 per foot!

 WIRELINE
LOGGING
EQUIPMENT
DETAILS OF WIRELINE LOGGING RIGUP

Modified from Halliburton (EL-1007)

LOGGING CABLE
OPEN HOLE WIRELINE LOGGING PROCEDURE

1. Rig-up
Place sonde(s) on cat-walk
Erect sheaves
Thread cable through
sheaves
Connect head to sonde
Using cable, lift sonde to rig
floor
Set 0 depth reference
2. Tool to TD
3. Repeat section 300ft/100m
4. Tool to TD
5. Full survey
6. Pull out of hole
7. Rig down
 LOG PRESENTATION - THE HEADING

Well location
Depth references
Date of log
Well depth
Casing shoe depth
Bit size
Mud data
Type
Properties
Resistivities
Max. Temperature
 IMPORTANCE
OF HEADERS

Note use of
Rm to
correct for
borehole
effects in
Dual
Laterolog
Tool

All tools are affected by the presence and properties of mud in the
borehole
It is necessary to record all mud properties, such as mud weight, mud
resistivity (at a given temperature) in the header
Modified from Halliburton EL-1007
LOG PRESENTATION - LINEAR GRID
Depth
Track 1 track Track 2 Track 3
LOG PRESENTATION - LOG GRID
Track 1 Depth Track 2 Track 3
track

n n+4
2x10 2x10
LOG PRESENTATION - HYBRID GRID
Depth
Track 1 track Track 2 Track 3

n
2x10

n+2
2x10
LOG PRESENTATION - COMMON DEPTH SCALES

Correlation
1:500 or 1:1000
2 in. (1:600) or 1 in. (1:1200)
Heavy lines every 100 ft. or
50m
Light lines each 10ft or 5m
Routine
1:200 or 1:240 (5 in)
Heavy lines every 50 ft. or 5 m
Medium lines each 10 ft. or 5
m
Light lines each 2 ft or 1 m
 MEMORIZATION - 1 D

Multi-sensors at different
positions create two
effects
Sensor D does not see C
bottom 70 ft. of well, etc.
Measurements B, C, and B
D are delayed until A
reaches where D was
May give depth mismatch
between curves

A
 STACKED LOGGING
TOOLS AND
MEMORY DISTANCES

Modified from Halliburton (EL-1007)

 UNMEMORIZED LOGS
VS
MEMORIZED LOGS

SAND
B

All memorization is
done using a surface
computer that records
SAND data coming from a
tool and the depth of
A

the reading.

Modified from Halliburton (EL-1007)

(TIME) (DEPTH)
MEMORIZATION - 2

On depth

Off depth
 DEPTH
SHIFTING
CORES
SHIFT

SP LLS LLD GRN

GR
(CORE)

W. Ayers, 1997
 CHOOSING A LOGGING TOOL

It is necessary to choose the right tool to get the desired

measurement.

Considerations:
Type of well ( wildcat or development )
Hole conditions ( depth, deviation, hole size, mud
type )
Examples:
Oil based mud : Induction tool
Water based salty mud : Laterolog Tool
Formation fluid content (fresh/salt connate water)
Economics (cost of the job, rig time involved)
TYPES OF LOGS TO BE RUN
Logging suites generally include one resistivity and
one porosity device
The logging string will also have other tools like the
gamma ray, SP and caliper tools
However, logging suites usually have two porosity
devices to give more information about rock type,
hydrocarbon type and porosity
Other considerations to estimate permeability or to
take fluid samples require other special tools like
the formation testers
NOMENCLATURE FOR ZONES IN
AND AROUND THE BOREHOLE

Modified from Halliburton (EL-1007)

LOGGING TOOL SPEEDS

Modified from Halliburton (EL-1007)

 TOOL CALIBRATIONS
A logging tool collects data that are converted to
porosity, resistivity, and other values

Each tool is calibrated to an industry standard

This ensures that each tool, irrespective of the type of

tool or tool history or service company, reads the
same value when logging the same formation
(normalization may still be required between log)

Check tool calibrations before and after a logging job

to ensure good quality log data
 LOGGING TOOL CALIBRATION SUMMARY

All changes should be within tolerance for an acceptable

calibration Modified from Halliburton (EL-1007)
TOOL RESPONSES IN COMMON MATERIALS

Modified from Halliburton (EL-1007)

 LOG QUALITY CONTROL

Check all calibrations before and after job

Record a repeat section of about 200 ft to ensure
validity of data and to explain abnormal curve
response
Compare log response with offset well logs
Keep hole conditions (hole size, mud type, tool
centralization) in mind when interpreting log data
Ensure that logging speeds are as recommended by
the service company.
 SUMMARY - WELL LOGGING

Several methods
Measurement many parameters
Provides geoscience & engineering info
Modest cost
Standard formats
Interpretation requires care
Most abundant source of reservoir data