Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 6

Acta Radiologica: Oncology

ISSN: 0349-652X (Print) (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ionc19

Long Term Effects of Ionizing Radiation on Mouse


Spermatogenesis

U. Hacker-Klom

To cite this article: U. Hacker-Klom (1985) Long Term Effects of Ionizing Radiation on Mouse
Spermatogenesis, Acta Radiologica: Oncology, 24:4, 363-367, DOI: 10.3109/02841868509136066

To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/02841868509136066

Published online: 08 Jul 2009.

Submit your article to this journal

Article views: 118

View related articles

Citing articles: 9 View citing articles

Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at


http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=ionc19

Download by: [169.149.0.118] Date: 14 July 2017, At: 12:49


Acta Radiologica Oncology 24 (1985) F a x . 4

FROM THE CLINIC O F RADIATION BIOLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF MUNSTER, D-4400 MUNSTER, WEST GERMANY.

LONG TERM EFFECTS OF IONIZING RADIATION ON MOUSE


SPERMATOGENESIS

U. HACKER-KLOM

Abstract Material and Methods


The effects of acute or split dose exposure to radiation Male NMRI mice aged 6 to 8 weeks were irradiat-
on murine stem cell spermatogonia were analysed. Flow ed in the testis region with roentgen rays (200 kV,
cytometry was applied to estimate the percentages of
haploid germ cells (round and elongated spermatids) up to 0.5 mm Cu, 0.5 Gy/min) acutely or with a split dose
12 months after irradiation. The recovery in the number of (2 equal doses at 4, 8, 24 or 48 hour intervals). The
haploid germ cells continued gradually during the period anterior part of the body was shielded with lead (0.2
under observation. The intervals between the two equal mm thick). The mice were killed at time intervals
doses in split dose exposures were 0, 4, 8, 24 and 48 after irradiation when the cellular descendants of
hours. Split doses that were 24 h or 48 h apart had more
harmful effects on spermatogenesisthan split doses with 4 the relevant irradiated cells were haploid germ cells.
or 8 hours intervals or acute exposures. The repair capaci- The two testes of 4 mice per dose and time point
ty of the stem cell spermatogonia was remarkably high. were measured separately.
Flow cytometry was performed using a flow cyto-
meter corresponding to that which is commercially
available from Partec AG (Bottmingen, Switzer-
The stem cell spermatogonia are responsible for
land). The cells were isolated and the DNA was
all long term effects of ionizing radiation on fertility.
stained according to the method of ZANTEet coll.
MEISTRICHet coll. (16) applied different assays to
(26, 27) using pepsin and ethidium bromide/mithra-
measure the ability of murine stem cells to regener-
mycin. As the composition of a testis DNA histo-
ate and to repopulate the seminiferous epithelium
gram has been described in detail by ZANTEet coll.
following exposure to radiation, by counting the
(26) and HACKERet coll. (8, 10) it will only be
number of sperm heads, by measuring the level of
explained briefly by the example of Fig. 1b. The first
the germ cell specific isoenzyme LDH-X, and by the
peak (I) in Fig. 1 b represents elongated spermatids
colony assay (1, 14, 25). In the present report, the
and spermatozoa, the second peak (11) round sper-
automated flow cytometric DNA content analysis is
matids, the third peak (111) different germ cells and
proposed as another method for the indirect quanti-
non-germ cells with a 2 c DNA content, and the
tative estimation of the survival of different male
fourth peak (IV) cells with a 4 c DNA content
germ cells, and especially the stem cells, by meas-
(mainly primary spermatocytes and, only to a small
uring the number of cellular descendants (haploid
percentage, (GZ+M)-spermatogonia). Between
germ cells). It has already been proposed that the
peaks Nos I11 and IV, cells synthesizing DNA are
flow cytometric analysis of spermatogenesis could
registered.
be used as a sensitive in vivo dosimeter for ionizing
radiation (8, 9, 10). Accepted for publication 23 October 1984.

363
364 U. HACKER-KLOM

L b
Fraction ol conlrol

l------
d

I
0 7 14 21 28 35
.
n
70
Rcialrve DNA- ~orltcnl Days after rrradiatton

Fig. 1. Photomicrographs of histologic cross sections of testes Fig. 2. Reduction of the number of haploid germ cells during the
and DNA histograms of testicular cell suspensions. Non-irradiat- first 10 weeks after irradiation with 4 different doses. The arith-
ed control mouse (a, b). Mouse 35 days (c, d) and 70 days (e, 0 metic means are plotted. 0.5 Gy (A),2.5 Gy (O), 10 Gy (A), 15
after irradiation with 15 Gy. GY(0).

Since about 80 per cent of the 2 c cells are non-


germ cells (Leydig and Sertoli cells, etc.) (7), which T
I .@+--.-& Control level
are not sensitive to ionizing radiation (3, 6, 12, 13, L

18,20), the 2 c cell percentage is taken as a constant


measure to estimate the radiation-induced reduction 0.5-

of the absolute number of germ cells, instead of the


relative changes in the cellular populations repre-
sented in the histogram. Thus, the percentage of
haploid germ cells was divided by the 2 c cell per-
centage in cases where no absolute cell counts were
0.1-
performed (10). Calculation of the percentages of c-
0 5 10 15
the different testicular cell types was performed Dose (Gyl
using the cumulative frequency distribution (4, 7, Fig. 3. Dose effect curve of the reduction of haploid germ cells
15). The data were analysed using the Wilcoxon (arthimetic means of the 1 c cell percentages divided by the 2 c
percentages) 70 days after acute irradiation with different doses
rank test. Histologic cross sections were stained (0.1-15 Gy).
according to the method of MEISTRICH et coll. (16),
with PAS/hematoxylin.
ly with 15 Gy 35 days (c, d) and one mouse 70 days
after irradiation (e, f).
Results
The photomicrograph of the histologic cross sec-
Fig. 1 shows 3 DNA histograms (b, d, f) and 3 tion (Fig. 1 a) corresponding to the testis DNA histo-
corresponding photomicrographs of histologic cross gram of a control mouse as described in the section
sections (a, c, e) of the samples from one non- on Material and Methods shows tubuli contorti in
irradiated control (a, b), one mouse irradiated acute- different stages of spermatogenesis. In Fig. l c , a
IONIZING RADIATION ON MOUSE SPERMATOGENESIS 365

Fraction of conlrol
I
and undifferentiated spermatogonia 35 days after
irradiation, and most marked after irradiation of
differentiating spermatogonia 28 days after irradia-
tion. Following exposure of stem cell spermatogonia
(70 days after irradiation), the number of haploid
germ cells was not much reduced.
Fig. 3 shows the dose-effect relationship for the
reduction of the number of haploid germ cells 70
days after irradiation. This dose-effect curve had a
0.1- shoulder. Only exposure to more than 2.5 Gy led to
I I
0 3 6 12 a remarkable decrease in the haploid germ cells.
Months after irradiation In Fig. 4, the arithmetic means of the 1 c cell
Fig. 4. The arithmetic means of the 1 c cell percentages divided numbers (% 1 c/% 2 c) at different intervals after
by the 2 c cell percentages were plotted in time-dependence 3, 6 acute exposures with 5 different doses are plotted.
and 12 months after acute exposures with 5 different doses. 3 Gy
(A), 4.5 GY( W , 6 GY(O),9 GY (V), 12 Gy (0. This figure shows an extension of the time scale in
Fig. 2. Three months after irradiation, there was a
Fraction of conlrol
clear dose-dependence in the germ cell reduction.
Six and 12 months after irradiation, however, a
I Control /eve/
strong dose-dependence was no longer seen. The
repopulation continued gradually during the 12
months of the observation period. The regeneration
and repopulation capacity of the stem cells was
surprisingly high, although following exposure to
more than 4.5 Gy the control level was not com-
pletely reached.
0.7{
In Fig. 5 , the arithmetic means of the 1 c cell
numbers (% 1 c/% 2 c) were plotted after two split
0 4 8 24 48
~

Interval fhj
dose exposures of a total of 12 Gy at 0 , 4 , 8 , 2 4 or 48
Fig. 5. The arithmetic means of the 1 c cell percentages divided hour intervals between the two equal exposures of 6
by the 2 c cell percentages were plotted in a time-dependent Gy. Following a split dose exposure at 24 or 48 hour
manner following split-dose exposures of 12 Gy at 0 , 4 , 8 , 2 4 or 48
hour intervals. 3 (A), 6 (O), 12 (0)months after irradiation. intervals, the damage from the 12 Gy absorbed radi-
ation dose to the stem cell spermatogonia obviously
was heavier than after split dose exposures at 4 or 8
depletion of the seminiferous epithelium from germ hour intervals or an acute exposure of 12 Gy. This
cells 35 days after irradiation is seen; in the corre- was significant for all values 3 months after irradia-
sponding DNA histogram (Fig. 1 d) peaks Nos I and tion and for most values 6 and 12 months after-
I1 representing haploid germ cells are missing. Fig. wards.
1 e demonstrates that 70 days after irradiation with No great difference was noted in the long term
15 Gy the interstitial and Sertoli cells were relatively damage from the 12 Gy split dose exposures at 0,4,
increased because of a reduction of germ cells. In or 8 hour intervals. However, following 12 Gy split
the DNA histogram of Fig. 1 f the haploid germ cells dose exposures at 24 or 48 hour intervals, the long
were reduced 70 days after the irradiation. The 2 c term damage 12 months after irradiation was heav-
cells were relatively increased when compared with ier. Following all 12 Gy exposures, the regeneration
Fig. l b . and repopulation during 12 months remained incom-
Fig. 2 shows the pattern of reduction of the num- plete in relation to the control level.
ber of haploid germ cells (round and elongated sper-
matids and spermatozoa, respectively) during the
Discussion
first 10 weeks after acute irradiation with 4 different
doses: 0.5, 2.5, 10 and 15 Gy. The reduction was The regeneration capacity of the murine stem
moderate after irradiation of spermatids, spermato- cells and their ability to repopulate the seminiferous
zoa and spermatocytes (2-21 days after irradiation) epithelium after exposure to radiation is surprising.
366 U . HACKER-KLOM

Even after exposure to more than 10 Gy, that is ysis of the effect of chronic whole-body irradiation
about twice as much as the dose inducing permanent with gamma-rays on the spermatogenic elements and
sterility in man (20), mouse spermatogenesis recov- the interstitial tissue of the testes of mice. J. nat.
Cancer Inst. 9 (1948), 133.
ers and enables fertility (16). Fertility is regained if 4. GOHDEW., SCHUMANN J., BUCHNERTH., OTTOF.
the testicular sperm concentration is 15 per cent of and BARLOGIE B.: Cytophotometry application in tu-
the control level (16). In man, the regeneration ca- mor cell biology and clinical oncology. In: Flow cyto-
pacity of the stem cell spermatogonia is much lower metry and sorting, p. 559. Edited by M. R. Melamed
(5, 11, 21, 22, 24). In mice, the stem cell spermato- and M. L. Mendelsohn. John Wiley and Sons, New
York, Chichester, Brisbane, Toronto 1979.
gonia undergo mitosis until they have reached about 5. GREINERR. und MEYERA.: Reversible und irrever-
their original number (18); in man, the stem cells sible Azoospermie nach Bestrahlung des malignen
begin to differentiate before increasing, thus reduc- Hodentumors. Strahlentherapie 153 (1977), 257.
ing their number a second time. This phenomenon 6. GUFTAG . S. and BAWA S. R.: Radiation effects on rat
induces a second depletion of the seminiferous epi- tests. VII. Alteration in nucleic acids and P32incor-
poration after partial body gamma-irradiation. Strah-
thelium, thus increasing the radiation sensitivity of lentherapie 149 (1975), 324.
the human exocrine testicular function. After one 7. HACKERU.: Biologische Dosimetrie ionisierender
acute exposure to 4 Gy in man, it takes 5 years or Strahlung am Model1 der Spermatogenese der Maus.
even more before the original sperm concentration Inaugural-Dissertation im Fachbereich Biologie. Uni-
in the ejaculate is reached (22). This corresponds to versitat Munster 1981.
8. - SCHUMANN J. and GOHDEW.: Effects of acute
about 30 spermatogenetic cycles (19). In the mouse, gamma-irradiation on spermatogenesis as revealed by
a complete regeneration of the seminiferous epithe- flow cytometry. Acta radiol. Oncology 19 (1980), 361.
lium is seen already 3 months after the same radi- 9. - - - Mammalian spermatogenesis as a new sys-
ation dose (2). This corresponds to about three cy- tem for biologic dosimetry of ionizing irradiation.
cles of spermatogenesis (17). However, following all Acta radiol. Oncology 21 (1982), 349.
10. - - - and MULLERK.: Mammalian spermatogen-
acute exposures to radiation of more than 4.5 Gy, esis as a biologic dosimeter for radiation. Acta radiol.
the regeneration remains incomplete during the 12 Oncology 20 (1981), 279.
months following the irradiation. This result agrees 1 1 . HELLERC.G., HELLERG.V., WARNERG. A. and
with the data of MEISTRICHet coll. (16). According ROWLEY M. J.: Effect of graded doses of ionizing
to RUGH (23), an exposure to 16 Gy destroys the radiation on testicular cytology and sperm count in
man. Abstract. Radiat. Res. 35 (1968), 493.
stem cell spermatogonia completely, thus inducing 12. Hu C. K. and FRAZIER C. N.: Atrophy of germinal
permanent sterility. The method proposed in this epithelium of the rabbits testis induced by roentgen
report, using flow cytometry, is a fast way to quanti- rays. Proc. SOC.exp. Biol. 48 (1941), 44.
fy the spermatogenetic function. 13. ITAGAKI G.: The effect of x-rays of lo00 R on male
germ cells in the mouse, with particular attention to
the difference in x-ray sensitivity of spermatogonia.
. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Jap. J. Genetics 45 (1970). 239.
The investigation was supported by the Commission of 14. KRAMER M. F., DAVIDSJ. A. G. and VON DERVEN
the European Communities for Biology, Radiation Protec- TH.P. A.: Effect of 1 MeV fast-neutron irradiation on
tion and Medical Research, contract number BIO-E-538- spermatogonial proliferation in mice, influence of
D (B). Thanks are also due to Mrs H. Zold and Mrs P. dose fractionation with different intervals. Int. J. Ra-
Berkes for skilful technical assistance. diat. Biol. 25 (1974), 253.
15. MEIERE.-M. : ZellbiologischerInformationsgehaltder
DNS-Verteilungen von Saugetierzellen und menschli-
REFERENCES chen Spontantumoren. Inaugural-Dissertation zur Er-
langung des doctor rerum medicinalium der Universi-
1. DE RUITER-BOOTSMA A. L., KRAMER M. F., DE tat Munster 1983.
ROOIJD. G.and DAVIDS J. A.: Response of stem-cells 16. MEISTRICHM. L., HUNTER N. R., SUZUKI N., TROS-
in the mouse testis to fission neutrons of 1 MeV mean TLE P.K. and WITHERS H. R.: Gradual regeneration of
energy and 300 kV X-rays. Methodology, dose-re- mouse testicular stem cell after exposure to ionizing
sponse studies, relative biological effectiveness. Ra- radiation. Radiat. Res. 74 (1978), 349.
diat. Res. 67 (1976), 56. 17. OAKBERG E. F.: Duration of spermatogenesis in the
2. ESCHENBRENNER A. B. and MILLER E.: Effects of mouse. Nature 180 (1957), 1137.
roentgen rays on the testis. Quantitative histological 18. - Initial depletion and subsequent recovery of sper-
analysis following whole body exposure of mice. matogonia of the mouse after 20 R of gamma rays and
Arch. Path. 50 (1950), 736. 100, 300 and 600 R of X-rays. Radiat. Res. 11 (1959),
3. - - and LORENZ E.: Quantitative histological anal- 700.
IONIZING RADIATION ON MOUSE SPERMATOGENESIS 367

19. - and CLARKE. Species comparison of radiation Edited by M. Errera and A. Forsberg, Vol. 11. Aca-
response of the gonads. In: Effects of ionizing radi- demic Press, New York, London 1960.
ation on the reproduction system, p. 1 1 . Edited by W. 24. SPEISERB., RUBINP. and CASARETT G.: Aspermia
D. Clarkson and F. X. GASSNER.Pergamon Press, following lower truncal irradiation in Hodgkins dis-
Oxford, London, New York, Paris 1964. ease. Cancer 32 (1973), 692.
20. - and LORENZE. C.: Irradiation of generative or- 25. WITHERSH. R., HUNTERN., BARKLEYH. T. and
gans. In: Handbuch der Medizinischen Radiologie, REIDB. 0.: Radiation survival and regeneration char-
Bd. 11, Strahlenbiologie, Teil 3, p. 217. Edited by 0. acteristics of spermatogenic stem cells of mouse tes-
Hug and A. Zuppinger. Springer Verlag, Berlin, Hei- tis. Radiat. Res. 57 (1974), 88.
delberg, New York 1972. 26. ZANTEJ., SCHUMANN J., GOHDEW. and HACKERU.:
21. OAKESW. R. and LUSHBAUGH C. C.: Course of testi- DNA-fluorometry of mammalian sperm. Histochem-
cular injury following accidental exposure to nuclear istry 54 (1977), 1 .
radiations. Radiology 59 (1952), 737. 27. - - BARLOGIEB., GOHDEW. and BUCHNERTH.:
22. ROWLEYM. J., LEACHD. R., WARNERG. A. and New preparation and staining procedures for specific
HELLERC. G.: Effect of graded doses of ionizing and rapid analysis of DNA-distributions. In: Second
radiation on the human testis. Radiat. Res. 59 (1974), International Symp. on pulse cytophotometry, Mun-
665. ster 1975, p. 97. Edited by W. Gohde, J. Schumann
23. RUGHR.: Effects of ionizing radiation on the testes and Th.Buchner. European Press, Ghent 1976.
and spermatozoa. In: Mechanisms in radiobiology.