Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
1 December 2017
How do we as philosophers and authors negotiate the duality of religion and our
modern conceptions of the Universe? The ever changing positions, the diametrically
opposed theories, the moral friction between the competing paradigms build to volcanic
pressure, spewing the fiery ash of ideology and skepticism across the philosophical
landscape. But once released from this chamber of incongruity, where does the column of
molten matter reach? Do its chemical compounds break from Earths atmosphere into the
encompasses the Earth, an artifact as old as creation? The question manifests as one of
the principle attacks on the veracity of Creation itself. The battle arises over the word
firmament, and in John Miltons Paradise Lost, it denotes the authors stance on the
The noun firmament is used in the Old Testament to describe the great dome
that encompasses the earth. This dome contains the stars of Heaven, as well as the barrier
between the two great bodies of water: the deep blue water of Earth-bound ocean below,
and the unreachable light blue ocean above, from which rain falls. The Firmament was
also described as a separating force in the King James Bible, again, dividing, the waters
from the waters. Finally it is used by Milton in his recreation of Genesis. Milton uses it
to again, divide the waters, although this time denoting it with the injection of expanse.
Milton writes, God made The firmament, expanse of liquid, pure, Transparent,
elemental air, diffused In circuit to the uttermost convex Of this great round. This is a
sharp departure from the original Hebrew translation. Instead of a solid, metallic dome
surrounding the Earth, Milton describes a liquid divide, comprised of seemingly holy
water vapor. Milton undoubtedly read the King James Bible that was in turn translated
from the original Hebrew, so where in the theological game of telephone was the word
warped? How could the author of this unprecedented Protestant, English epic mutilate the
Creation? While it is impossible to know his intent, the clues for Miltons resolve reveal
firmament, which is itself contradictory. The idea of a firmament comes from the Hebrew
Bible. As we already know, it separated the waters from the waters. The contradiction
comes from the language used to describe the physical nature of the Firmament.
Firmament is translated from the Hebrew word raqia, which describes a solid and firm
structure. The root of raqia, the verb raqa, which in the bible is used to describe the
stamping and spreading out of metals, especially gold, further supports this model. Sure,
the idea of firmness does not come to mind when describing leaf gold, but it does create a
proficient compound of the too, a structure that is metal and impenetrable, but
simultaneously able to extend across the great expanse of sky. It is worth noting that
firmament also alludes to the physical place of Heaven itself. After the division of the
waters, God called the firmament Heaven. Later, when God creates the stars, the Sun,
and the Moon, he places them in the firmament, giving the intrinsic human image of
This is the context for John Milton when he begins writing his interpretation of
Creation in Book Seven. He knows that the Firmament was the first element in the
organization of Earth, that it is a metallic dome circumscribing the Earth, and that it is
metonymic for Heaven. Why then, does he use elemental air to describe it? One could
say that he was living in Renaissance, an era in which any educated person could study
Galileo and Copernicus and know that there was no physical boundary between the Earth
and Space; this would be a sure sign of a political statement against the antiquated
institution of the Church of England. However, it would dismiss the detailed and vibrant
effort Milton makes in the previous seven books. We can only analyze what the texts
gives us, which is more confounding evidence. Just after describing the Firmament as
water vapor, he describes it as, a partition firm and sure. The dichotomy of these
this is not the case. In this moment of creation, when the only distinction of matter is
division of water, and light, and dark, matter is shown in its most raw and chaotic form.
Before the Firmament, before night and day, before the waters above and below, matter
swirled in a chaotic moate, but by creating the Firmament, God gives action to the
matter. The barrier is firm and sure, yet, still in its beginning. It is elemental and
liquid pure. The denotation of matter as highly viscous, inspired water vapor describes
Miltons materialist philosophy. Formerly erratic matter now has structure with, chaos
far removed, and by divine manipulation, motion. This is further demonstrated by how
Milton describes the naming of Heaven: Heaven he named the firmament. Instead of
calling the firmament Heaven, he calls Heaven the name Firmament, transferring the
power from Heaven to the Firmament. And this barrier, endowed with elemental air, is
These motives may contradict each other and they are certainly disputed. But the most
essential aspect Paradise Lost is the fact of the text. The written words and ideas are what
demonstrate the critical aspects of Miltons work, and to understand them we must cast a
firmament, divide the competing ideas, and discover the matter of Creation.