Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Roosevelt Island, NY
I. Description: On behalf of the Roosevelt Island Operating Corporation of the State of New
York (“RIOC”), Jones Lang LaSalle (“JLL”) is seeking to leverage the expertise
of the real estate industry to improve the community retail and services offered on
Roosevelt Island (“RI”) through this request for proposals (“RFP”) from qualified
investors and operators (“Investors” or “Proposers”) for the acquisition and
management (the “Disposition”) of some or all of the retail and office space in the
following six (6) buildings (the “Buildings”) located on Main Street, the primary
north/south thoroughfare and the central retail corridor on RI (the “Retail
Space”):
1
Includes 4,812 SF that is month to month and 6,241 SF that is occupied by Non-Profits. Additionally
RIOC occupies 3,776 SF in several retail units.
2
RIOC would like the RI branch of NY Public Library to be expanded. The Library has expressed an
interest in relocating and expanding into a floor in this building.
RFP Goal: Through this RFP RIOC is seeking to maximize the best value for
RIOC (“Best Value”), which is defined generally, and more specifically defined
in the Selection Criteria, as the selection of a single Investor entity as master
operator of the Retail Space or multiple Investors operating their respective Retail
Units based on a proposal or proposals that:
There are approximately 30 existing stores in the Retail Space. Each Building’s
Retail Space is identified by number as listed and identified by unit number in the
above table (“Retail Unit”). Retail Units 1 through 4 are located in residential
buildings originally developed under the Mitchell-Lama program that are on
ground leases with RIOC. RIOC administers properties on RI under a master
lease with the City of New York (“the City”) that expires December 23, 2068 (the
“Master Lease”). Eastwood’s ground lease was recently extended to December
22, 2068. Rivercross’, Island House’s and Westview’s ground leases are in
negotiations to be extended to be coterminous with Eastwood. It is expected that
these extensions will be subject to each Building maintaining an ‘affordable
housing” plan approved by various government agencies.
Proposers are invited to submit proposals for the acquisition of the Retail Space in
accordance with the terms and conditions of this RFP. Proposers may submit
proposals for all of the Retail Space or one or more entire Retail Units. The
successful Proposer(s) will become the/a formal designated Investor(s) (the/a
“Designated Investor”) for all or a portion of the Retail Space with whom RIOC
may then enter into a sublease(s) or other form of transaction agreement(s) (for
the Retail Space (“Disposition Agreement(s)”) with one or more proposer (the
“Investor(s)”) selected by RIOC at RIOC’s sole discretion.
II. Disposition Term: The maximum Term shall be through December 22, 2068
III. Submission Date RFPs are to be received in a sealed envelope by JLL no later than 5:00 PM
& Place: Eastern Standard Time on Wednesday October 13, 2010 (“Proposal
Submission Date”) addressed to:
Jones Lang LaSalle
601 Lexington Avenue
33rd Floor
New York, NY 10022
IV. Communications: The RFP, the Application and Registration Agreement (“Registration Agreement”
Exhibit B), addenda to the RFP, if any, and other general and/or public
information will be available on the following website (the “RI RFP Website”):
http://www.us.joneslanglasalle.com/RIretail
Alternatively proposers may contact JLL in writing by, email, fax or certified
mail as per Section V of this RFP.
Requests for clarification concerning this RFP should be made by email only to
JLL at the above email address. No board member, officer or employee of RIOC,
the State or City of New York, or any of their respective public agencies or
advisors are authorized to give interpretations of this RFP or additional
information regarding the requirements of this RFP directly or indirectly to
individual Proposers or their representatives. Interpretations or additional
information with respect to this RFP, if provided, will be publicly communicated
from JLL to all Registered Proposers by email or written addenda, and posted on
the RI RFP Website, and shall be considered part of the RFP. Direct or indirect
contact by a Proposer or any third-party person or entity representing a
Proposer or a Proposer’s interest, retained directly or indirectly by a
Proposer, with or without compensation, with RIOC (its employees, officials,
board members, contractors) or any other party involved in the selection and
approval of the Designated Investor other than JLL (sometimes referred to
hereinafter as the “Designated Point of Contact”) regarding this RFP or any
component of the RFP Process may result in immediate disqualification.
Site Visits and Pre-Submission Conference: Site visits will be available upon
request and be scheduled subject to reasonable notice. A pre-submission
conference will be scheduled for all Proposers that have forwarded an executed
Proposals will only be accepted from Proposers who have registered prior to
the Proposal Submission Date.
JLL is the designated point of contact for the RFP (“Designated Point of
Contact”). All “Contact” (defined as any oral, written or electronic
communication with a governmental entity under circumstances where a
reasonable person would infer that the communication was intended to influence
the governmental disposition or procurement) during the period commencing
upon the date of the release of this RFP and ending upon the last action taken by
RIOC to dispose of the Retail Space or any portion thereof (the “Restricted
Period”) shall be made solely to the Designated Point of Contact. During the
Restricted Period, no Contact, other than the Permitted Contacts described below
and contacts with the Designated Point of Contact, Proposers or their
representatives should not contact any employees, officers, directors, board
members, consultants or any representatives of RIOC or any other governmental
entity regarding this RFP or send inquiries, proposals or responses to them.
Failure to observe this requirement may result in the proposer's disqualification.
V. Current With the exception of Unit 6, the Units comprising the Retail Space have been
Conditions: controlled by RIOC or its predecessor agency, the Urban Development
Corporation (“UDC”) since the early 1970’s when UDC exercised its option to
sublease the Commercial Space back from the WIRE Buildings. Under the
Master Lease, the Ground Rent for all Commercial Space is $0.60 per SF
(“Commercial Space Ground Rent”). Under the sublease agreements with
Westview, Rivercross and Eastwood the UDC was obligated to pay the
Commercial Space Ground Rent and a basic rent of $2.40 per SF. Island House
was a total payment of $3.00 per SF. These obligations continue for the
Commercial Space in Westview and Island House. The current payments for the
Commercial Space in Eastwood is limited to the space’s proportionate share of
the building’s TEPC, as defined in Section VII. Proposers should take this into
account in the Financial Terms of their proposal No such payments are due to
Rivercross. .
The Retail Space’s current vacancy rate is approximately 20.7%. The Retail
Space totals 98,527 SF above-grade of which 78,096 SF are occupied and 20,431
SF are vacant. There are 14,829 SF occupied without long term leases of which
4,812 SF are under month-to month leases, 6,241 SF are occupied by existing
non- profit entities (excluding Day Spring Church) and 3,776 SF are occupied by
RIOC. Recent proposals have been received with rents ranging from the mid to
high teens to the mid $30’s, subject to use and space characteristics. The Retail
Space’s annual net operating income (“RIOC’s Retail NOI”) for the period
ending March 31, 2010 is approximately $900,000.
Through this RFP, RIOC is seeking a qualified Investor(s) with the capital,
commitment, expertise and track record to turnaround underperforming assets in a
market with high demand for community-based retail and services. It is
anticipated that the Investor(s) will have the resources and creativity necessary to
improve the vibrancy and appearance of the Main Street retail corridor and have
the management skills to maintain and enforce high quality design and operating
standards of its subtenants.
VI. Planning & Zoning: The Retail Space lies within Block 1373 Lots 1 and 40. Separate tax lots for the
Retail Space will not be created.
Development on Roosevelt Island is governed by, inter alia, the 99 year Master
Lease dated December 23, 1969 between the City of New York, as lessor, and
RIOC as successor in interest to the Urban Development Corporation, as lessee ,
the General Development Plan for Roosevelt Island, attached thereto (see Section
XVIII of this RFP), the RIOC Enabling Legislation (Chapter 899 of the Laws of
Under the Zoning Resolution of the City of New York (“Zoning Resolution”), all
of Roosevelt Island is zoned R7-2. RIOC intends to make the Retail Space subject
to Zoning Resolution standards, including permitted uses, applicable to an R7-2
district. Retail Unit #6 may be eligible for expansion and redevelopment subject
to plans to be approved by RIOC and Proposers should note the above reference
concerning a possible relocation of the Library to the ground floor.
• RFP proposals are to be submitted using the FOS form that will be made
available online upon completion of the Registration Agreement.
RFP proposals shall clearly state the following and be submitted on the FOS
form:
A) Proposer Profile- Information about the proposer including, but not limited to,
marketing capabilities and experience with retail property.
1) Term- The proposed term of the transaction, including any renewal terms.
2) Acquisition Payment- The proposer should express the economic terms (the
“Acquisition Payment”) to be paid to RIOC for the Retail Space over the
proposed Term including a detailed description of guaranteed payments and/
or rents (“Guaranteed Payments”) and conditional payments, if any,
(“Conditional Payments”) and the method and/or formula used to determine
the amount and timing of such payment(s). The Acquisition Payment should
also address other economic terms, including, but not limited to, escalations
C:\Documents and Settings\darin.early\Desktop\Retail-Retail Package 2010 v25 Final.doc
8/30/2010
Page 6 of 28
and rent resets but should exclude payments for capital events, which are
addressed separately below. The proposer may also propose other pricing
alternatives.
The Acquisition Payment should take into account that, in accordance with
the Master Lease, the current Ground Rent for Commercial Space of $0.60
per SF adjusts on the 40th Anniversary of the date each property received its
initial C of O to a rent which is based on the then fair market value of the
land for comparable commercial space in New York City (the “Ground Rent
Reset”). Under the Master Lease, the Ground Rent due under the Ground
Rent Reset is 6% times the product of (i) the fair market land value per SF
times (ii) the number of SF of Commercial Space.
3) Tax Equivalent for Commercial Space (“TEPC”)- Under its Master Lease
with the City, all Commercial Space is subject to real estate tax equivalency
payments (“TEP”) to be assessed, determined and paid by the Investor(s) in
the same manner as “like property” in the City. The Retail Space is defined
as Commercial Space and is therefore subject to TEP and is defined in this
RFP as TEPC. The Investor(s) will be required to make such TEPC
payments.
Proposers must identify and include in the required 30-year cash flow
projections (a) the timing and amount of TEPC payments that they would
anticipate being due in their RFP proposal and (b) subject to the property
qualifying, any real property tax abatements, real property tax exemptions, or
other real property tax related matters consistent with those available in
comparable locations in the City of New York for comparable property
which would change the timing or reduce the amount of such TEPC
payments to RIOC. Proposers should include an explanation of the
assumptions of assessed value used in estimating TEPC.
VIII. Financial Under no circumstances shall RIOC be liable for any of the costs of any Proposer
Responsibility: or the Designated Investor(s) in connection with preparing a proposal in response
to this RFP, negotiating with RIOC or otherwise participating in this RFP
process.
Following the execution and delivery of an MOA, RIOC and the Designated
Investor(s) shall have one-hundred twenty (120) calendar days to negotiate,
execute and deliver a Disposition Agreement. The Disposition Agreement is
In addition, the Investor(s) will be solely responsible for the following costs and
expenses: (i) to the extent applicable, New York City and New York State real
property transfer and conveyance taxes; (ii) New York City Commercial Rent
Tax; (iii) recordation fees with respect to any recordable instruments
contemplated by the documents which shall govern the transaction for the Retail
Space and (iv) the cost of any surveys desired by the Investor(s).
IX. Utilities & RIOC will require the Investor(s) to provide and/or expand, at its sole cost, any
Infrastructure: needed infrastructure to support the proposed transaction.
X. Permits & The Investor(s) will be required, at its sole cost and expense, to comply with all
Approvals: applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations, and to obtain from all
appropriate government authorities all construction and ancillary approvals
needed for the redevelopment or operation of the Retail Space, including but not
limited to, all required building permits and approvals.
XI. Environmental: If a Retail Space proposal(s) were to trigger the need for an environmental review
under the State Environmental Quality Review Act (“SEQRA”), the Investor(s)
will fully compensate RIOC, as lead agency, for all costs and expenses associated
with compliance with SEQRA, including but not limited to the cost and expenses
of any and all reports, analysis, and documentation; public notifications, outreach,
meetings, and hearings; and the procurement of environmental consultants and
counsel as may be required.
Proposers will defend, hold harmless and indemnify RIOC with respect to any
damages or liabilities in connection with any environmental, engineering or other
testing undertaken by proposers.
7. The proposer's and its principals’ good moral character and freedom
from any criminal conduct involving moral turpitude or other violations
of law. The Investor(s) selected by RIOC is expected to adhere to
standards of business conduct justifying the confidence of RIOC’s
obligations under the Disposition Aagreement.
In order to determine Best Value when evaluating RFP responses, RIOC will
utilize the following Selection Criteria and weightings that, in its sole and
absolute discretion are in the best interests of RIOC:
XIII. RFP Selection RIOC will establish a real estate evaluation committee that will review all RFPs.
Process: The evaluation committee will present such evaluations to RIOC’s Board of
Directors (the “Board”) for action and selection of the best proposer(s).
RIOC will review all proposals for completeness and compliance with the terms
and conditions of the RFP, and may at its sole discretion, request from any or all
proposers additional material, clarification, confirmation or modification of any
proposal that is incomplete or non-conforming as submitted. Except at the request
or by the consent of RIOC, proposers will not be entitled to change their RFP
responses once submitted. RIOC will select the proposals for the Retail Space
that, in the sole discretion of RIOC, most successfully fulfills the Selection
Criteria.
RIOC reserves the right to negotiate any and all terms of any transaction with the
Designated Investor(s). If such negotiations cannot be concluded successfully
with the Designated Investor(s), RIOC may choose to negotiate with other
Proposers, terminate the selection process or begin a new selection process.
XIV. Ownership & RIOC shall be entitled to retain and use, without compensation to any party
Use of Idea responding to this RFP, any information submitted, including but not limited to
Submissions: any concept, element or idea (including financial ownership structures or
schemes) disclosed in or evident from the foregoing or which may be revealed
during any meetings or interviews with proposers.
XV. Conclusion of It is estimated that review of the initial proposals will be concluded within 120
RFP Review: days after the Proposal Submission Date of the RFP proposals and any additional
information requested by RIOC.
XVI. Brokers: Other than to JLL, no brokerage fees, finders' fees, commissions or other
compensation will be payable by RIOC in connection with the selection of the
Investor(s) or the Dispostion of the Retail Space. Submission of a RFP proposal
by a proposer in response to this RFP will constitute an undertaking by such
proposer to hold harmless and indemnify RIOC, the New York State Division of
Housing and Community Renewal, the Urban Development Corporation currently
d/b/a the Empire State Development Corporation, the State of New York and the
City of New York and their directors, officers, employees and
XVII. About RIOC: Roosevelt Island is administered by RIOC, a public benefit corporation created by
the New York State Legislature in 1984 to manage, develop and operate the 147
acre Roosevelt Island, located in New York City’s East River, in the borough of
Manhattan. RIOC has promoted the development of a mixed-use, residential and
commercial community that is home to more than 18,000 residents. RI has six
historic landmarks, several parks, sports facilities, an aerial tramway, playgrounds
and a waterfront promenade. RIOC continues to develop and maintain utilities,
public promenades and commercial opportunities on the island to support private
development. Roosevelt Island is under the political jurisdiction of Manhattan,
but it receives its police, sanitation and fire services from Queens. The State of
New York holds a 99-year master lease (“Master Lease”) of the Island which will
expire in 2068; ownership will then revert to the City of New York.
Roosevelt Island has been developed by RIOC and its predecessor, the New York
State Urban Development Corporation (“UDC”), in accordance with the Master
Lease and the broad programming reflected in its General Development Plan
(“GDP”). The GDP, created in 1969 by Philip Johnson and John Burgee, is a
five-page document attached to the Master Lease.
XVIII. Proposers Public access to material submitted by proposers in response to this RFP and
Information & Contact subsequent RFP shall be governed by the relevant provisions of the Freedom of
Disclosure: Information Law, which constitutes Article 6 of the New York State Public
Officers Law ("FOIL"), and regulations adopted pursuant thereto. If any proposer
submits information that it believes to be a trade secret or otherwise exempt from
disclosure under FOIL, it must specifically identify such information and state in
writing the reasons why the information should be exempt from disclosure.
New York State Finance Law §§139-j and 139-k (see attached “Roosevelt Island
Form 1”) imposes disclosure and record keeping requirements on RIOC and
prospective contractors with regard to their contacts and all proposers must
comply with these requirements. In particular, proposers must provide certain
information with respect to any persons and organizations retained, employed or
designated by or on behalf of the proposer to influence RIOC’s selection of the
RFP proposers and the Investor(s), and, the RFP proposers and the Investor(s)
will be required to update such information throughout the selection process. In
the event RIOC becomes aware of any material misrepresentation in the
information supplied by a proposer, RIOC shall have the right to reject at any
time the proposal of the proposer, to refuse to negotiate or continue negotiations
with the proposer and to take any other action, including retaining any deposits,
Expense Fund or Security payments made by the proposer, as shall be deemed
appropriate by RIOC in its sole discretion.
XIX. Representations RIOC and JLL make no representations or warranties, including without
or Warranties: limitation representations or warranties as to the accuracy of any information or
assumptions contained in this RFP or otherwise furnished to proposers by RIOC
or JLL; the use or progress of development of any site or any other portion of
Roosevelt Island; site conditions or the suitability of the Retail Space for any
specific use or development; and tax assessments that may be made by the City
of New York, tax rates that may be established by the City of New York, or the
amount of TEPC payable with respect to the Retail Space.
XX. Not an Offer: This RFP does not constitute an offer to sell or lease the Retail Space or any
portion thereof, nor a solicitation of offers to sell or lease the Retail Space or any
portion thereof. Neither RIOC or JLL nor any affiliate or subsidiary of any of the
foregoing, shall incur any obligation or liability on account of any submission
made in connection with this RFP (nor shall any proposal be deemed accepted)
unless and until an agreement setting forth all the terms and conditions of a
transaction has been fully negotiated and a written agreement incorporating such
terms and conditions has been fully executed and unconditionally delivered by all
the parties thereto and all necessary consents and approvals have been obtained
including, without limitation, approval of such written agreement by the RIOC
Board and any other government or quasi-government agencies.
Westview
591 RIOC Offices 1,780 888 1,996 4,664
599C We are One (Clothing) 1,320 1,320
599D Accounting/Finance 1,320 1,320
605 Vacant (Formerly Grog Shop) 1,546 787 2,333
609 China 1 - Restaurant 1,530 694 2,224
615 Boy Scouts - Store/Office 776 776
619 Amalgamated Bank 2,974 2,974
Subtotal 11,246 2,369 1,996 15,611
Island House
549 Trellis/Coffee Shop 2,364 1,814 4,178
559 Vacant 568 286 854
563 Island Newsstand 2,229 1,844 4,073
567 RI Cleaners 2,203 962 3,165
579 M&D Delicatessen 2,090 1,058 3,148
Subtotal 9,454 5,964 0 15,418
Eastwood
504 Vacant School/Misc 5,000 1,378 5,740 12,118
520 Thrift Shop 3,835 3,835
526 NY Public Library 2,322 2,322
530 Vacant-Retail/Office 1,158 1,158
532 Vacant-Retail/Office 1,050 1,144 2,194
544 RI Hardware/Video 2,172 710 910 3,792
546A Vacant-Retail/Office 686 1,280 1,966
548 Public Safety-Retail/Office 420 420
550 Public Safety-Retail/Office 480 480
552 Public Safety-Retail/Office 1,803 1,081 2,884
564 Cabrini Chapel 914 914
568 Vacant-Store/Office 505 505
570 RI Nail Salon 816 205 1,021
Subtotal 21,161 4,518 7,930 33,609
Rivercross
503 Vacant 1,978 300 2,278
507 Dr. Flanigan 808 808
513 Vacant-Retail/Office 920 920
523 Beauty Salon of RI 1,294 1,294
527 Riva Gallery 1,630 816 2,446
Subtotal 6,630 1,116 0 7,746
14
Exhibit B:
15
16
Roosevelt Island Form 1
June 2010
I. INTRODUCTION
These Guidelines Regarding Procurement Lobbying (the “Guidelines”) have been issued
pursuant to the New York State Finance Law §§139-j and 139-k (“Procurement Lobbying Law”),
which, with limited exceptions, prohibit lobbying on procurement contracts. As further set forth
below, the Guidelines apply to Roosevelt Island Operating Corporation (“RIOC”) procurement
contracts, and limit communications between Offerers1 and RIOC during the Restricted Period of a
Governmental Procurement. During the Restricted Period, Offerers may only communicate with
the person or persons designated by RIOC to receive communications regarding such procurement.
Contact Any oral, written or electronic communication with RIOC staff or its
consultants about a Governmental Procurement under
circumstances where a reasonable person would infer that the
communication was intended to influence the Governmental
Entity’s conduct or decision regarding the Governmental
Procurement.
Governmental Entity All New York State agencies and authorities; both houses of the
Legislature; the Unified Court System; municipal agencies and their
respective employees.
Governmental Procurement (i) the public announcement, public notice, or public communication
to any potential vendor of a determination of need for a procurement,
which shall include, but not be limited to, the public notification of
the specifications, bid documents, requests for proposals, or
evaluation criteria for a procurement contract, (ii) solicitation for a
Procurement Contract, (iii) evaluation of a Procurement Contract,
(iv) award, approval, denial or disapproval of a Procurement
Contract, or (v) approval or denial of an assignment, amendment
(other than amendments that are authorized and payable under the
terms of the Procurement Contract as it was finally awarded or
1
Hereinafter, defined terms are in bold.
17
approved by the Office of the State Comptroller, as applicable),
renewal or extension of a Procurement Contract, or any other
material change in the Procurement Contract resulting in a financial
benefit to the Offerer.
Restricted Period The period of time commencing with the earliest date of written
notice, advertisement or solicitation of a request for proposal,
invitation for bids, or solicitation of proposals, or any other method
for soliciting a response from Offerers intending to result in a
Procurement Contract with RIOC and ending with the final contract
award and approval by RIOC, and where applicable, the Office of the
State Comptroller.
III. EXEMPTIONS
Certain communications are exempt from the Guidelines and do not need to be directed to a
designated contact. These include:
(1) the submission of written proposals in response to a request for proposals, invitation for bids or
any other method for soliciting a response from Offerers intending to result in a Procurement
Contract;
(2) the submission of written questions to a designated contact by a method set forth in a request
for proposals, or invitation for bids, or any other method for soliciting a response from
Offerers intending to result in a Procurement Contract, when all written questions and
responses are to be disseminated to all Offerers who have expressed an interest in the request
18
for proposals, or invitation for bids, or any other method for soliciting a response from
Offerers intending to result in a Procurement Contract;
(4) complaints by an Offerer regarding the failure of the person or persons designated by RIOC
pursuant to this section to respond in a timely manner to authorized Offerer contacts made in
writing to the Chief Financial Officer of RIOC, provided that any such written complaints shall
become a part of the procurement record;
(5) Offerers who have been tentatively awarded a contract and are engaged in communications
with RIOC solely for the purpose of negotiating the terms of the Procurement Contract after
being notified of tentative award;
(6) Contacts between designated RIOC staff and an Offerer to request the review of a
Procurement Contract award;
(7) (a) Contacts by Offerers in protests, appeals or other review proceedings (including the
apparent successful bidder or proposer and his or her representatives) before RIOC seeking a
final administrative determination, or in a subsequent judicial proceeding; or (b) complaints of
alleged improper conduct in a governmental procurement to the attorney general, inspector
general, district attorney, or court of competent jurisdiction; or (c) protests, appeals or
complaints to the State Comptroller's office during the process of contract approval, where the
State Comptroller's approval is required, provided that the State Comptroller shall make a
record of such communication and any response thereto which shall be entered into the
procurement record;
(8) communications between Offerers and RIOC that solely address the determination of
responsibility by RIOC of an Offerer;
(9) any communications relating to a Governmental Procurement made under §162 of the State
Finance Law undertaken by (I) the non-profit-making agencies appointed pursuant to paragraph
E of subdivision 6 of §162 of the State Finance Law by the Commissioner of the Office of
Children and Family Services, the Commissioner for the Blind and Visually Handicapped, or
the Commissioner of Education, and (II) the qualified charitable non-profit-making agencies
for the blind and/or other severely disabled persons as identified in subdivision 2 of §162 of the
State Finance Law; provided, however, that any communications which attempt to influence
the issuance or terms of the specifications that serve as the basis for bid documents, requests
for proposals, invitations for bids, or solicitations of proposals, or any other method for
soliciting a response from Offerers intending to result in a Procurement Contract with a
Governmental Entity shall not be exempt from the provisions of these Guidelines;
19
IV. VIOLATION
A violation of these Guidelines occurs when there is a Contact during the Restricted Period
between the Offerer and someone other than the person(s) designated by RIOC to receive
communications for the particular Governmental Procurement. This includes instances where the
Offerer Contacts RIOC regarding a procurement of another Governmental Entity.
V. PROCEDURES
1. For each Procurement Contract, at the same time that a Restricted Period is
imposed, RIOC will designate a person or persons, who are knowledgeable about
the procurement, to receive communications from Offerers concerning the
Governmental Procurement.
2. RIOC will incorporate a summary of the policy governing lobbying during a
Governmental Procurement in its documents relating to the Procurement
Contract and provide a copy of the policy and prohibitions regarding permissible
communications to Offerers.
3. RIOC shall seek written affirmation from all Offerers indicating that they
understand and agree to comply with these Guidelines (Attachment 1). Such a
written affirmation by an Offerer shall be deemed to apply to any amendments to
a procurement submitted by RIOC after an initial affirmation is received with an
initial bid.
20
Procurement Contract for a period of four years from the date of the second
final determination.
3. The Procurement Contract must include a provision allowing RIOC to
terminate the contract if the certification is subsequently found to be incomplete,
false or inaccurate. Admissions by the Offerer of past findings of non-
responsibility may constitute a basis for rejection of the Offerer by RIOC. RIOC
can award a contract to the Offerer despite the past findings of non-responsibility
if it determines that the award of the Procurement Contract to the Offerer is
necessary to protect public property or public health or safety, and that the
Offerer is the only source capable of supplying the required Article of
Procurement within the necessary time frame. The basis of such a finding must
be included in the procurement record of the Governmental Procurement.
C. Recording Contacts
1. All members, officers and employees of RIOC must record any Contact from
any person or entity. Contacts may be initiated by parties with an interest in the
procurement that are not necessarily connected directly to the Offerer. Contacts
may come in the form of telephone conversations, correspondence, electronic
mail and person-to-person discussions. The Record of Contact Form (Attachment
3) should be used to record all Contacts. The form shall be made available from
the RIOC Finance Department.
21
k. Debriefing of an Offerer after a contract award has been made.
5. The RIOC Chief Financial Officer, or his or her designee, will be required to
ensure that all Records of Contacts are included in the procurement record for the
related Procurement Contract.
2. If the RIOC Chief Financial Officer should find at the conclusion of the
investigation that the Offerer knowingly and willfully made a prohibited
Contact in violation of these Guidelines, then the Offerer shall be
disqualified as non-responsible, unless RIOC makes a finding that the
award of the Procurement Contract to the Offerer is necessary to
protect public property or public health or safety, and that the Offerer is
the only source capable of supplying the required Article of
Procurement within the necessary time frame. The basis of such a
finding must be included in the procurement record of the Procurement
Contract.
22
Attachment 1
Name of Offerer_____________________________________
Address: __________________________________________
__________________________________________________
Name and Title of Person Signing the Affirmation
1
Attachment 2
All Procurement Contracts2 by the RIOC in excess of $15,000 annually, are subject to New
York State’s State Finance Law §§139-j and 139-k (“Procurement Lobbying Law”). Pursuant to the
Procurement Lobbying Law, all Contacts during a Governmental Procurement must be made only
with a designated person or persons. Exceptions to this rule include written questions during the
bid/proposal process, communications with regard to protests, contract negotiations and RFP
conference participation. Nothing in the Lobbying Law inhibits any rights to make an appeal, protest
or complaint under existing administrative or judicial procedures.
Violations of the policy regarding permissible contacts must be reported to RIOC’s Chief
Financial Officer (“CFO”) and investigated accordingly. The first violation may result in a
determination of non-responsibility and ineligibility for award to the violator and its subsidiaries,
affiliates and related entities. The penalty for a second violation within four (4) years is ineligibility
for bidding/proposing on a procurement and/or ineligibility from being awarded any contract for a
period of four (4) years. RIOC will notify the New York State Office of General Services (“OGS”) of
any determinations of non-responsibility or debarments due to violations of the Procurement
Lobbying Law. Violations found to be “knowing and willful” must be reported to the CFO and OGS.
Moreover, the statutes require the RIOC to obtain certain affirmations and certifications from bidders
and proposers. The below disclosure statement contains the forms with which to comply, together
with additional information and instructions.
Instructions
New York State Finance Law §139-k(2) obligates the RIOC to obtain specific information
regarding prior non-responsibility determinations. This information must be collected in addition to
the information that is separately obtained pursuant to New York State Finance Law §163(9). In
accordance with New York State Finance Law §139-k, an Offerer must be asked to disclose whether
there has been a finding of non-responsibility made within the previous four (4) years by any
Governmental Entity due to: (a) a violation of New York State Finance Law §139-j or (b) the
intentional provision of false or incomplete information to a Governmental Entity.
As part of its responsibility determination, New York State Finance Law §139-k(3) mandates
consideration of whether an Offerer fails to timely disclose accurate or complete information
regarding the above non-responsibility determination. In accordance with law, no procurement
contract shall be awarded to any Offerer that fails to timely disclose accurate or complete
information under this section, unless the factual elements of the limited waiver provision can be
satisfied on the written record.
1
Please refer to RIOC’s Guidelines Regarding Procurement Lobbying (available on www.rioc.ny.gov) for
additional information.
2
All terms in bold are as defined in State Finance Law §139-k(1).
1
Offerer Disclosure of Prior Non-Responsibility Determinations
Address:
Date:
1. Has any Governmental Entity made a finding of non-responsibility regarding the individual or
entity seeking to enter into the procurement contract in the previous four years? (Please circle):
No Yes
2. If yes, was the basis for the finding of non-responsibility due to a violation of State Finance Law
§139-j? (Please circle):
No Yes
3. Was the basis for the finding of non-responsibility due to the intentional provision of false or
incomplete information to a Governmental Entity? (Please circle):
No Yes
5. Has any Governmental Entity or other governmental agency terminated or withheld a procurement
contract with the above-named individual or entity due to the intentional provision of false or
incomplete information? (Please circle):
2
No Yes
Offerer certifies that all information provided to the Roosevelt Island Operating Corporation with
respect to State Finance Law §139-k is complete, true and accurate.
Name: _____________________________
Title: _____________________________
3
Attachment 3
Was the person making the Contact informed that the Contact would be documented?
[ ] Yes [ ] No
From:
_________________________________________________________________________________
(Name and title)
Date:
________________________________
I had Contact with the below named individual regarding the above identified procurement.
The term “Contact” is defined in State Finance Law §139-k (1)(c). In accordance with State Finance
Law §139-k (4), the following information was obtained.
Name:
_________________________________________________________________________________
Address:
_________________________________________________________________________________
Telephone Number:
_________________________________________________________________________________
Occupation:
_________________________________________________________________________________
Is the above named person or organization the “Offerer” in this governmental procurement? (Please
circle)
4
No Yes
Optional:
Summarize the form (e.g., email, letter, conversation) and topic of the communication on each date
of Contact:
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________