CHAPTER I

INTRODUCTION

A. The Background

Field Practice Program is one of the extracurricular activities which is the

culmination from the whole learning and education programs achieved by the students in

learning process in postgraduate program of Universitas Negeri Medan. Field practice can

be defined as the program of training in developing, innovating, and to apply several

aspects of cognitive, affective and psychometric in order to create the professional teacher

and lecturer. The implementation of oriented curriculum of National Qualification

Framework of Indonesia (KKNI) has been applied in postgraduate program of Universitas

Negeri Medan in odd semester of 2017/2018 academic years. The implementation of the

curriculum of KKNI needs several supporting devices in order to achieve the

objectives/competence which are stated in that curriculum.

The main characteristics of KKNI oriented curriculum is the equivalence and to

match the students ability as the alumni to the work place needs. It concerns on the

current situation of field work and to give the chance to the students in developing and

innovating based several field problems solving so possibly needed the extra competence

in the process of learning.

B. The Objectives of the Field Practice Implementation

The objectives of the field practice to students are as follows:

1. To create the professional educator candidate through field practice programs;

2. To give the developing ability and innovation as well as a wide knowledge for

students to find the problem solving of the field work;

3. To develop and innovate the theories and principles of the sciences based real

problems of field work;

1
 2

4. To identify the environment physic, administration, academic and psychosocial of

the field work;

5. To implement the teaching skill in the environment of postgraduate program.

6. To apply the whole professional ability of educators cohesively in college

environment.

7. To experience the educative value from the experience during the field work

through the reflection and pouring it in the report.

C. The Significances of the Field Practice Implementation

The significances of the field practices to the students practically are as follows:

1. The students can apply and develop their knowledge which is got during the

learning process in college through field practice based on the conditions and need

of guided students.

2. The students can see and feel physic and physiologies atmosphere from the real

education process of one institution, hence it can give the real useful experience for

the students.

3. The students can increase the quality and professionalism in education field which

he/she masters.

4. Students can understand more the essence of education because they have known

directly by their self the scope of education which will be mastered.

 3

CHAPTER II

GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE FIELD WORK

A. Profile of Languages and Arts Faculty

FACULTY NAME : Faculty of Languages and Arts (FBS)

ADDRESS : Jl. Willem Iskandar Pasar V, Medan 20221

TELP : (061) 6623942

FAX : (061) 6623942

E-MAIL : fbs@unimed.ac.id

Study Programs administered by the Faculty

1. Prodi Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia (S1 degree)

2. Prodi Sastra Indonesia (S1 degree)

3. Prodi English Education (S1 degree)

4. Prodi English Literature (S1 degree)

5. Prodi German Education (S1 degree)

6. Prodi of French Education (S1 degree)

7. Prodi Pendidikan Seni Rupa (Level S1)

8. Prodi Pendidikan Seni dan dance (S1 degree)

9. Prodi Pendidikan Seni musik (S1 degree)

Vision, Mission and Purpose of the Faculty of Languages and Arts (FBS)

are formulated with reference to the Vision, Mission, and Purpose of the University.The

establishment of Vision, Mission and Purpose of FBS was developed after conducting an

in-depth analysis of various noble values and the future situation of the nation, so FBS is

3
 4

anticipative, innovative and productive in producing the works that stakeholders

need. Vision reflects the conditions FBS wants to achieve and has been translated into

programs with clear strategies and steps. The vision is also a glue that brings together the

ideas and aspirations of various parties.

Preparation of the FBS vision involves all elements both internally and externally

through the mechanisms of workshops, workshops, and discussions at the faculty level. At

the internal level, various aspects of the vision, mission, and objectives have been assessed

and also involve external stakeholders consisting of practitioners, local government, North

Sumatra Education Office, Tourism Office, and business and industry representatives (DU

/ IN). It also conducted tracer study and hearings with the alumni on several workshops

and seminars conducted 9 Study Program to determine the external needs of stakeholders.

B. FBS Unimed Vision

Become a leading faculty in 2020 in the fields of language, literature, art and

culture and learning at the national level and gained international recognition.

C. FBS Unimed Missions

1. Conducting quality education in the fields of language, literature, arts and culture

for students and society.

2. Conducting research and interdisciplinary study of language, literature, art and

culture through innovation methods for the preservation and development of

science, technology, and art.

3. Conducting devotion to the community through innovative methods and

technology of learning language, literature, and cultural arts.

4. Achieve a healthy academic culture and dynamic for the academic community.
 5

5. Organize cooperation with relevant institutions at local, regional, national, and

international levels that support the tridharma and quality improvement of

resources.

D. Purposes of FBS Unimed

1. Produce qualified and professional graduates in accordance with the development

of user needs and noble virtuous character.

2. Produce innovative research and studies required by internal and

external stakeholders.

3. Produce works of community service to improve the dignity, dignity, and benefit of

the academic community and the general public.

4. The realization of a healthy academic culture and dynamic for the academic

community through academic activities.

5. Generate collaboration with relevant institutions at the local, national, regional and

international levels that support the tridharma and quality improvement of

resources.
 6

E. The Organization Structure of Languages and Arts Faculty

The Rector of
Unimed

Vice Vice Vice Vice

Rector I Rector II Rector III Rector IV
Dean of Languages
and Arts Faculty

Vice Vice Vice

Dean I Dean II Dean III

Head of Indonesian Head of English Head of Foreign Head of Fine Arts Head of Drama,
Language & Language & Language Department Dance, & Music
Literature Literature Department Department
Department Department

Head of Head of Head of Head of Head of Head of Head of Head of Head of

Indonesian Indonesian English English Germany French Dance Music Arts Show
Language Literature Language Literature Language Language Education Education Study
Education Study Education Study Education Education Study Study Program
Study Program Study Program Study Study Program Program
Program Program Program Program

Head of
Administration
Division

Head of Academic Head of General Head of Financial Head of Students

Sub Division and Facilities of and Staff Sub and Alumni Sub
Academic Sub Division Division
Division

Students
 7

The Structure of Languages and Arts Faculty of Universitas Negeri Medan

Dean : DR. ISDA PRAMUNIATI., M.Hum

Vice Dean I : Dr. WAHYU TRI ATMOJO, M.Hum

Vice Dean II : DRS. BASYARUDDIN., M.Pd

Vice Dean III : Dr. MARICE, M.Hum

Language and Literature of Indonesia Department

: DRS. SYAMSUL ARIF., M.Pd

Head of Department

: TRISNAWATI HUTAGALUNG,S.Pd.,M.Pd.
Secretary of Department

Head of Indonesian : FITRIANI LUBIS, S.Pd., M.Hum

Language Study Program

Head of Indonesian : Dr. WISMAN HADI., M.Hum.

Literature Study Program

Language and Literature of English Department

: PROF. DR. SUMARSIH., M.Pd

Head of Department

: DRA. MEISURI., M.Ed.

Secretary of Department

Head of English Language : NORA RONITA DEWI., M.Hum

Education Study Program

Head of English Literature : JULI RACHMADANI Hsb.,M.Hum

Study Program
 8

Foreign Language Department:

: DR. EVI EVIYANTI., M.Pd.,

Head of Department

: RISNOVITA SARI., M.Hum.,

Secretary of Department

Head of Germany Language : HAFNIATI., MA

Education Study Program

Head of French Language : Dr. ZULHERMAN, S.Pd., MM., M.Pd.

Education Study Program

Drama, Music and Dance Department:

: UYUNI WIDIASTUTY., M.Pd.

Head of Department

: PITA DAME SILITONGA., M.Pd.

Secretary of Department

Head of Music Arts : PULUMUN P., GINTING., M.Sn

Education Study Program
Head of Dance Arts : SITTI RAHMAH., S.Pd.,M.Si
Education Study

Fine Arts Department

: DRS. MESRA., M.Sn.,

Head of Department

: DRS. GAMAL KARTONO., M.Si.

Secretary of Department

Administration

Head of Administration Division : JUNAIDAH. S.Pd

Head of Academic Sub Division : KURNIA HENDRA PUTRA. SE.M.Si

Head of General and Facilities of Academic

: Dra. RUMATA
Sub Division

Head of Financial and Staff Sub Division : NAZLAINI, SE

Head of Students and Alumni Sub Division : MHD. OKFIN MAHYUNIR. SE

 9

CHAPTER III

THE IMPLEMENTATION OF FIELD PRACTICE

A. The Report of the Result of Learning Process of the Students

The teaching practice has done three times, once for pedagogy (Curriculum

Development) and twice for professional (Speaking for Informal). The report of

learning process of students were taken only from the professional subject, because this

class were possible to make the scoring while in pedagogy subject it was only focus on

assessment only.

The result of students learning process can be seen as follows:

Score

No Name Informal Speaking Affective

Subject
Number Letter Number Letter
1 Abu Rizal Marif 90 A 3.60 Very Good

2 Iegi Margana Ginting 90 A 3.67 Very Good

3 Endamya Bevi Barus 90 A 3.55 Very Good

4 Erista Hiwanta 87 B 3.56 Very Good

5 Fitri Lulu 88 B 3.60 Very Good

6 Friska Simare Mare 89 B 3.51 Very Good

7 Indah Sari 90 A 3.68 Very Good

8 Ade Lina Sundari 89 B 3.53 Very Good

9 Ayu Juwita 89 B 3.51 Very Good

10 Chindy Chintya 88 B 3.54 Very Good

11 Chronika Rossiana 87 B 3.55 Very Good

12 Faradiba 90 A 3.67 Very Good

9
 10

13 Finka Firanda 88 B 3.57 Very Good

14 Hanimas Eka Pratiwi 89 B 3.56 Very Good

15 Irvanda Syahputra 90 A 3.60 Very Good

16 Kharisma 90 A 3.60 Very Good

17 Lidya Utami 87 B 3.56 Very Good

18 Lusi Maharani 90 A 3.61 Very Good

19 Mariati Nainggolan 89 B 3.50 Good

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36
 11

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

49

50

The score above was calculated from the two meetings with the same materials

or topic discussion. The subject score was combined from the worksheet task, and

performance task, while the affective score was calculated from the attendance and the

respond of the students during the learning process in the classroom or outside the

classroom.

B. The Involvement of Student in Non-Teaching Academic Activities

During the process of field practice, the student practitioner was involved in non

teaching academic activities one of them were observation. The observation was done

separated from the teaching activities, it can be the schedule observation, class

observation and teaching-learning process observation. The observation was done to

 12

describe the condition of the class and the teaching method as well as the next material

would be taught. It helped the students practitioner to construct the lesson planning,

and finding the relevant references for the next material as well as the teaching method

used in the next class.

C. The Involvement of Student in Extracurricular Activities

The students were actively participated in several extracurricular programs held

by Languages and Arts Faculty such as Expo from the English Department. The expo

was held in front of the faculty. Every class participated in the succession of expo.

Some students also joined the organization in the campus such as the Department

Organization of Students, Students Religious Organization, Nature Organization, etc.

D. The Successfulness of Student in Field Practice Implementation

The successfulness of the field practice implementation is one of the expectations

of this program. There are several indicators of the successfulness of this field practice.

The first one is timing. The timing is all the aspects relate to the time, schedule,

duration, etc. This field practice has conducted efficiently, because the process of

conducting was on time. It meant that the field practice was not running until the end

of class or semester. The schedule of field practice was also relevant to the college

schedule, it meant that the field practice schedule did not disturb the schedule of

college. The duration of the class practice was also managed well, it meant that the

class was begun on time and the students participated actively.

The second one was the students participation. The participation from the

students were actively got. They followed the class from the beginning until the end of

the meeting. They also responded all the instructions given the field practitioner. They

also attended the class actively without any more absences.

 13

The third one was the field practice advisors, they also participated actively

during the process of field practice. They guided and gave more information and

references in order to increase the quality of teaching and learning process in the class

room as well as outside the classroom.

The last one was the final report of the field practice. It can be said that this

report was also successfully reported. This report is submitted on time and there was

no obstacle during the writing and finishing this report.

E. The Constraints of the Student in the Field Practice Implementation

In conducting this field practice, there were also several constrains such as the

procedures of field practice. For example, the process of choosing the field advisors,

the field practitioner did not recognize all the lecturers in the field practice place. So it

spent more time to meet and communicate to the lecturers. Moreover the subject also

had been decided by the postgraduate study program to choose. It was professional and

pedagogical subject. It became more complex because there were many students from

the postgraduate program who took languages and arts faculty as the field of practice.

Thus, it was difficult to fix the field advisors and the subject relevant particularly for

the pedagogical subject.

The next constraint was the assessment process not relevant to the field practice

itself. For example, in assessing the social and personal aspect of the student

practitioner there were some points that not match to the postgraduate level.

F. The Critics and Suggestions to the Next Field Practice Implementation

a. Critics

The critics to the current field practice implementation:

 14

1. The readiness of the postgraduate program seems not maximum because of this

is the first time to have a field practice for postgraduate students, and the

information got by the students sometimes different from the advisors or

postgraduate program.

2. Some points of the assessment module are not relevant with the postgraduate

students especially for the students who take place in industry, office, or

language center.

b. Suggestions

The field practice student suggests to the next field practice implementation as

follows:

1. To determine the schedule of practice and advisors in the beginning of the

semester so the time for practicing the field practice would be longer.

2. To create the interactive communication among the postgraduate program, field

works and students in order to keep the process of field practice running well.
 15

CHAPTER IV

CLOSURE

This field practice really gives more advantages to the students. Through this

program they can develop their skill in teaching as well as applying the theory of

languages particularly for English Applied Linguistics Study Program students.

Furthermore, the students also can interlace the communication with the advisors in the

field work. It also trained the students to improve their skill, attitude and knowledge

according to the focus of the field study which is mastered by the students. So far, the

purpose of this field practice is good, so that is way this program should be continued and

increased to be better in the next implementation. Finally, as the demand of KKNI

curriculum the students are now more confident to face the world because they have

directly involvement in field practice and it is very useful for students themselves.

14
 16

THE REPORT

FIELD PRACTICE PROGRAM

IN LANGUAGES AND ARTS FACULTY (FBS)
OF UNIVERSITAS NEGERI MEDAN

Arranged to complete the assignments

And to fulfill the requirements in order to sit on examination
of field practice program in English Department Study Program
of Language and Arts Faculty of Universitas Negeri Medan

by :

Muhammad Ilham Adha

NIM : 8166112019

ENGLISH APPLIED LINGUISTICS STUDY PROGRAM

POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL
UNIVERSITAS NEGERI MEDAN
2017
 17

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ACKNOWLEDGMENT .................................................................................................. i
TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................. iii

CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION

A. The Background ..................................................................................................... 1

B. The Objectives of the Field Practice Implementation ............................................ 1

C. The Significances of the Field Practice Implementation ........................................ 2

CHAPTER II THE GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF LANGUAGES AND

ARTS FACULTY

A. The Profile of Languages and Arts Faculty ............................................................. 3

B. The Vision of Languages and Arts Faculty ............................................................. 4

C. The Mission of Languages and Arts Faculty .......................................................... 4

D. The Purpose of Languages and Arts Faculty .......................................................... 5

E. The Organization Structure of Languages and Arts Faculty .................................. 6

CHAPTER III THE IMPLEMENTATION OF FIELD PRACTICE

A. The Report of Teaching and Learning Process ...................................................... 9

B. The Involvement of Student in Non-Teaching Academic Activities ...................... 11

C. The Involvement of Student in Extracurricular Activities ..................................... 11

D. The Successfulness of Student in Field Practice Implementation ........................... 11

E. The Constraints of Student in the Field Practice Implementation .......................... 12

F. The Critics and Suggestions to the Next Field Practice Implementation ............... 13

CHAPTER IV CLOSURE

Appendix 1 The Daily Logs

Appendix 2 The Documentation
Appendix 3 The Lesson Planning

iii
 18

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

First of all, the writer would like to thank to Allah SWT for His mercy and

blessing so the writer still has the occasion to arrange and submit this field practice report.

Secondly, the writer also would like to greet the Prophet Muhammad SAW for His

meritorious struggle to bring the people from the darkness era into the brightness one.

This report aims to describe and to report the process and the result of the Field

Practice Program in Language Department Study Program of Language and Arts Faculty

of Universitas Negeri Medan, Medan, North Sumatera. In order to finish all the phases in

this program, the writer was humbly directly and indirectly helped by several parties such

as lecturers, students and colleagues. So, in this occasion, the writer also would like to

thank to:

1. The Rector of Universitas Negeri Medan;

2. The Director of Postgraduate Program of Universitas Negeri Medan;

3. The Head of English Applied Linguistics Study Program of Postgraduate Program of

Universitas Negeri Medan;

4. The Dean of Language and Arts Faculty of Universitas Negeri Medan;

5. The Head of English Department Study Program of Language and Arts Faculty of

Universitas Negeri Medan;

6. The Field Advisor of Field Practice Program;

7. The Field Instructor of Field Practice Program;

8. The Students of English Department of Language and Arts Faculty of Universitas

Negeri Medan;

9. The colleagues.

i
 19

Finally, the writer hopes that this report will be useful for all the parties especially

to the English Applied Linguistics Study Program and for all the next field practice

students.

Medan, December, 2017

Writer,

Mara Sutan Siregar

Reg. Number: 8166112015

ii