Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
)
MOHAN A. HARIHAR, )
)
Appellant )
) Case No. 17-2074
v. )
)
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )
)
Appellee )
)
RECONSIDERATION
The Appellant respectfully prefaces this MOTION with the following Disclosure statement:
The gravity of serious legal issues addressed in the Civil Complaint against THE UNITED
STATES, this associated Appeal, and in the RELATED Appeal,1 include (but are not limited
to) evidenced allegations of TREASON under ARTICLE III, Section 3 of the Constitution,
Economic Espionage pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1832 and are believed to impact matters of
National Security. Therefore, copies of this filed MOTION are sent via email, social media
and/or certified mail to: The Executive Office of the President (EOP), the US Inspector
1
The related Appeal references HARIHAR v. US BANK et al, Appeal No. 17-cv-1381 (Also,
lower court Docket No. 15-cv-11880).
Senate and House of Representatives, the House Judiciary Committee, House Oversight
Committee and to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). A copy will also be made
evidenced acts of misconduct (alleged). Parties are additionally informed for documentation
purposes, and out of the Appellants continued concerns for personal safety/security.
AFTER REVIEWING THE ORDER issued December 7, 2017 the Appellant, Mohan A.
the Court. While the Appellants Motion was granted IN PART allowing an extension to file
his Appellate brief by January 29, 2017, the requested STAY of Appeal pending the decision(s)
of (at minimum) NINETEEN (19) UNRESOLVED ISSUES, was not. It is unclear exactly how
this Court could have arrived at this decision, considering the severity (and totality) of
unresolved issues. These unresolved issues are restated as follows for the record:
issues pertaining to both this First Circuit Court of Appeals as well as the lower District
2. An ANSWER from The United States, expected by 5pm on December 15, 2017,
claims pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1832, and matters believed to impact National Security;
6. The Court has YET TO ACKNOWLEDGE legal issues within AND extending
BEYOND this Federal Judiciary, including (but not limited to) Title 18, U.S.C., Section
242 Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law; Title 18, U.S.C., Section 241
Conspiracy Against Rights; Title 18, U.S.C., Section 1001 Fraud and False
including (but not limited to) evidenced claims of Judicial FRAUD on the COURT;
8. The Court has YET TO ACKNOWLEDGE the Plaintiffs REPEATED concerns for
9. Request for the Court to Assist with the Appointment of Counsel pursuant to 28
10. Reimbursement of accruing Legal Fees due to the Appellant, as stated within the record
CONGRESSIONAL INTERVENTION;
14. The Court has YET TO ACKNOWLEDGE the relationship of this Complaint to
18. The Court has YET TO ACKNOWLEDGE and RECOGNIZE a well evidenced and
COMPLAINT(S) necessarily filed against Judge Denise J. Casper, and NINE (9)
The Appellant has set forth meritorious arguments in each of the issues listed above. Judicial
economy would suggest that staying the time for the Appellant to submit his Briefs (if it even
The Appellant respectfully requests clarification for the record with regard to the following:
1. Please clarify WHICH Circuit Judge issued the referenced order on December 7,
here remains an issue. Circuit Judges - Torruella, Kayatta, Barron, Thompson, and
Chief Justice Howard are considered to have lost jurisdiction and are no longer
claims of TREASON (one (1) count each) have been brought to the attention of the
grant the requested STAY, considering (at minimum) the severity (and totality) of
3. Please provide specific detail as to WHY the above list of issues remain unresolved
be resolved.
Upon providing the requested clarification, the Appellant respectfully requests that this Court
RECONSIDER its decision, and GRANT the requested STAY, until ALL unresolved issues
have been properly addressed. Once the record shows that there are no remaining issues, and
IF it is still necessary to move forward with filing an Appellate brief, the same 40-day extension
For documentation purposes, after sending a copy of this document to the President, the email
from The White House confirming receipt is attached (See Attachment A) with the filed Court
copy. If there is a question regarding ANY portion of this Motion, the Appellant is happy to
provide additional supporting information upon request, in a separate hearing and with the
Mohan A. Harihar
Appellant
7124 Avalon Drive
Acton, MA 01720
Mo.harihar@gmail.com
Attachment A
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on December 15, 2017 I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of
Court using the CM/ECF System, which will send notice of such filing to the following
registered CM/ECF users:
Mohan A. Harihar
Appellant
7124 Avalon Drive
Acton, MA 01720
Mo.harihar@gmail.com