Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 3

Diaazonkiyiudvsurwieokfjdkmcvfjbd diaziopijashuiidiwhdiwue Hectorne KJ & Fransway AF Contact Dermatitis

30(1), 16-19, (1994)

2. Erythrocyte Toxicities of Imidazolidinyl Urea and Diazolidinyl Urea Noureddine H, et al. Journal of Materials
Science and Engineering. B 3(7B), 445-445, (2013)

READ ABSTRACT

3. Non-fragrance allergens in specific cosmetic products.

Ana Rita Travassos et. al


Contact dermatitis, 65(65), undefined (2011-9-29)
Reports about the nature of the ingredients responsible for allergic contact dermatitis caused by specific cosmetic products
are scarce. Between January 2000 and December 2010, the specific cosmetic products having caused allergic contact
dermatitis,...Read More

READ ABSTRACT

4. Formaldehyde-releasers in cosmetics: relationship to formaldehyde contact allergy. Part 1. Characterization, frequency


and relevance of sensitization, and frequency of use in cosmetics.

Anton C de Groot et. al


Contact dermatitis, 62(62), undefined (2010-2-9)
In this part of a series of review articles on formaldehyde-releasers and their relationship to formaldehyde contact allergy,
formaldehyde-releasers in cosmetics are discussed. In this first part of the article, key data are presented including
frequ...Read More

READ ABSTRACT

5. Temporal trends of preservative allergy in Denmark (1985-2008).

Jacob P Thyssen et. al


Contact dermatitis, 62(62), undefined (2010-2-9)
Most cosmetics and industrial products contain preservatives. Preservative allergy is common and, historically, changing
contact allergy epidemics caused by preservatives have been observed. In 1997, Alan Dillarstone predicted a stable
development of...Read More

READ ABSTRACT
6. Formaldehyde-releasers in cosmetics: relationship to formaldehyde contact allergy. Part 2. Patch test relationship to
formaldehyde contact allergy, experimental provocation tests, amount of formaldehyde released, and assessment of risk to
consumers allergic to formaldehyde.

Anton de Groot et. al


Contact dermatitis, 62(62), undefined (2010-2-9)
This is the second part of an article on formaldehyde-releasers in cosmetics. The patch test relationship between the
releasers in cosmetics to formaldehyde contact allergy is reviewed and it is assessed whether products preserved with
formaldehyde-r...Read More

READ ABSTRACT

7. Characterization and chemistry of imidazolidinyl urea and diazolidinyl urea.

Søren Vig Lehmann et. al


Contact dermatitis, 54(54), undefined (2006-1-24)
For several decades, the cosmetic preservatives imidazolidinyl urea (IU) and diazolidinyl urea (DU) have not only been
poorly characterized but have also had misleading chemical structures assigned to them. The most common trade names of
IU and DU ar...Read More

READ ABSTRACT

8. Experimental elicitation of contact allergy from a diazolidinyl urea-preserved cream in relation to anatomical region,
exposure time and concentration.

Claus Zachariae et. al


Contact dermatitis, 53(53), undefined (2005-11-15)
The elicitation potential of the cosmetic preservative diazolidinyl urea was studied in formaldehyde- and diazolidinyl urea-
sensitized volunteer patients using a stepwise controlled exposure design. The test product was a facial moisturizer,
preserve...Read More

READ ABSTRACT

9. Standardization of the TRUE Test imidazolidinyl urea and diazolidinyl urea patches.

T Agner et. al
Contact dermatitis, 45(45), undefined (2001-6-26)
The preservatives imidazolidinyl urea (IMID, Germall 115) and diazolidinyl urea (DU, Germall II) are commonly used in
cosmetic products and are well-known sensitizers. The aim of the present study was to establish the optimal patch test
concentration...Read More
READ ABSTRACT

10. Sensitivity of petrolatum and aqueous vehicles for detecting allergy to imidazolidinylurea, diazolidinylurea, and DMDM
hydantoin: a retrospective analysis from the North American Contact Dermatitis Group.

Robert L Rietschel et. al


Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug, 18(18), undefined (2007-8-30)
To determine whether petrolatum or aqueous vehicles are more sensitive for detecting allergy to imidazolidinylurea (IU),
diazolidinylurea (DU), and dimethylol dimethyl hydantoin (DM). The relationship of these allergens to formaldehyde
sensitivity wa...Read More

READ ABSTRACT

11. ROAT: morphology of ROAT on arm, neck and face in formaldehyde and diazolidinyl urea sensitive individuals.

Claus Zachariae et. al


Contact dermatitis, 54(54), undefined (2006-1-24)
The morphology of early allergic contact dermatitis reactions was studied in formaldehyde allergic individuals exposed to a
cream product preserved with 4 different concentrations of diazolidinyl urea. The study was made using a dose-escalating
desig...Read More

READ ABSTRACT

12. Cosmetic preservatives as therapeutic corneal and scleral tissue cross-linking agents.

Babar N, Kim M, Cao K, et al.


Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 56(2)(56(2)), undefined (2015)

READ ABSTRACT

13. Formaldehyde-releasers in cosmetics in the USA and in Europe.

Anton C de Groot and Margo Veenstra


Contact dermatitis, 62(62), undefined (2010-3-20)
Frequencies of sensitization to formaldehyde among US patients patch tested for suspected contact dermatitis are higher
than in Europe. Cosmetics are an important

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi