Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Tavistock HiFi
You have recently been appointed the management accountant for Tavistock HiFi
Limited (Tavistock). Your brief is to implement any strategies chosen by the board of
directors, and your specialist knowledge and relevant industry experience were key
to you being given the job. The board have made it clear that they wish you to
suggest anything that will make the company perform better.
The company was started in 1996 by Paul Dennis, and it has remained a family run
business ever since. In recent years the founder, Paul, has been looking at
succession planning, and this resulted in the appointment of his son, Mark, as Chief
Operating Officer (COO) two years ago. Paul remains as Chairman, but he is no
longer involved in the day to day operations. The role of Chairman enables Paul to
exert influence on strategic decisions. In October 2016 Paul sold shares to the
Victory Hedge Fund (Victory) and the shareholding now is as follows:
%
Chairman (Paul) 40
COO (Mark) 10
Victory Hedge Fund 50
From the earliest days, the company has manufactured high quality hi-fi amplifiers.
These have been sold via a select band of enthusiastic dealers to discerning
audiophiles, many of whom are attracted by the “designed and made in the UK”
nature of the products, as well as the high-end audio quality of the amplifiers.
Reliability and service are key strengths of the offering to the customer: in the very
rare event of any problem occurring with a Tavistock amplifier, a dealer will ensure
that a replacement is provided with two working days. As a result of the exacting
construction standards at the company’s factory, located in Devon, the warranty
costs incurred by Tavistock have been negligible. It has been very rare for any
customer to make a warranty claim during the class-leading ten year warranty
period.
Paul Dennis did not run Tavistock in a way to maximise profits. His passion was
creating amplifiers that were highly respected by customers and hi-fi journalists, and
during the nineteen years that he ran the company he was happy for growth to be
slow. Profits were sufficient for Paul to enjoy his life, and he never saw the need to
develop the sales of the company outside the UK.
He sold 50% of the shares to the Victory Hedge Fund in the hope that he would have
sufficient funds for his retirement. In Paul’s ideal world, he would not have sold
these shares to a bunch of “city kids”, but Mark did not have sufficient funds to
enable all the shares to remain in the family. Paul had hoped that Mark, under
Paul’s guidance, will continue running the company with little change. However, Paul
is increasingly aware that he needs to maximise the amount he can receive for his
remaining shares in order that he might have sufficient money to live on in his old
age. He plans to sell his remaining shares within the next two years.
Mark Dennis finds himself caught between two large shareholders with significantly
different aspirations for the future of the company. He has appointed you to help him
to decide how to proceed. He is aware that it might be hard to please both of the
main shareholders, and he needs your expertise to consider the future options.
The new amplifier is now fully developed. It is a design of which the industry experts
have very high expectations, being a combination of modern digital streaming
technology and the warm sound of a classic valve amplifier. This new product, to be
called the Oscar, is ready for production. However, Mark has not yet decided where
manufacturing should take place, although he has identified two main options:
OPTION 1
Production can be continued at the company’s existing factory in Devon. It is to be
assumed that there will be no start-up costs by using the existing factory, and it is
also to be assumed that all of the existing staff can be transferred to making the
Oscar without any need for any training costs. If staff are transferred, the production
of the existing amplifier, the Classic, will cease immediately. Currently, 600 Classics
are made and sold each year. This is not expected to change in future years. For
every one Oscar that will be produced, production of one Classic will be lost. The
production costs of one Classic are £260, advertising and delivery costs are £80 per
unit and the mark-up by the dealer is £100 before they sell each Classic for £500.
OPTION 2
Production of the new Oscar could be undertaken by a manufacturer in Shenzhen,
Guangdong Province, China. This would require a shipping delay of six weeks, but
would give lower costs. A suitable manufacturer has been identified who, at today’s
exchange rate, can make the Oscar for:
£
Components 370
Labour (10 hours at £3.20) 32
Supplier’s profit 40
Total cost from manufacturer 442
This compares favourably with the estimated cost if Tavistock were to make the
Oscar. Tavistock’s costs would be:
£
Components 410
Labour (10 hours at £10.00) 100
Tavistock’s total manufacturing cost 510
The only difference in construction of the Oscar between the locations is that the
Chinese manufacturer would utilise a different type of valve when making each
Oscar. Whilst Tavistock would use a valve that had been cryogenically treated, the
valves available in China would not be treated and so would be more fragile. A
proportion of these valves would be expected to break during the transit from China
to the UK. Consequently, the estimated warranty costs if manufacturing were
located in China would be twice the estimated £30 per unit for UK construction.
Tavistock estimates a sales level for Oscars for 2018 of 1,000 units, which will
increase by 20% per annum thereafter. The sales price will be £860 per Oscar in
2018, and is expected to increase at 5% per annum. The company is looking at a 10
year life for the Oscar amplifier. The profit margin of the Chinese subcontractor is
expected to increase by 5% per annum, this being in effect a form of profit-sharing
between the two companies.
During your initial discussion with the Victory Hedge Fund, the fund manager pointed
out that wages in Shenzhen are increasing rapidly (from 2011 to 2016 averaging 9%
per annum), so much so that some of the other companies in which they own shares
are bringing production back to the UK. Wage increases for Tavistock’s employees
in the UK are currently only 2.2%. Victory ask you to consider the expected future
wage rates in your financial analysis of the next 10 years. Victory also ask you to
consider wage levels in Bangladesh, which has the lowest wage levels of South East
Asia – perhaps production should be moved there instead of Shenzhen?
You are to ignore all forms of Taxation in your report. Your recommendations are to
be the result of careful research. If your research leads you to conclude that the
assumptions above are not realistic, you should use your assumptions and make
clear your sources.
All of your sources are to be shown in an appendix and you are to use the Harvard
referencing system, so that the readers of the report can check your evidence for
accuracy.
So that your group can be confident about your approach, you can meet me for a 15
minute meeting. At this meeting you will give a 10 minute (maximum) presentation
detailing the main points that you plan to include in your report. This must include
your expected profits each year for each option:
Option 1: production remains in the UK;
Option 2: the production of Oscars will occur in China
and a summary of any key assumptions and recommendations that you plan to
include in your report.
A maximum of 4 feedback points will be given to you shortly after the meeting.
Your meeting will take place at some stage from 13th November onwards.
GROUP Number.................
Note 1 – If you wish to split the mark equally, you will put 33% in each box here.