Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
The merits of micromanagement are that the employee is constantly corrected, guided,
advised, counseled and mentored by the boss. Micromanagement is good if the employee is new
to the organization and they needed guidance and direction. In doing so the managers are able to
ensure that the target is achieved. It is like an infant being cared and nurtured by his mother. But
over a period of time, the employee feels confident and comfortable in handling and executing the
However, if the process of micromanagement persists the employee gets discomfort and
feels irritated just as in the case of an adult who is mature but still treated by his mother as still
infant. Micromanagement prevents innovation. Employees cannot come up with new ideas and
procedures on their own; they have to constantly check with the micromanager who is often
unavailable. Workers become drones that wait to be told what to do rather than take risks that come
with innovation. Employees with skills and knowledge will leave such situations and the
organization is left with workers who are content to wait to follow instructions.
Micromanagement slows workflow, as all approvals have to go through the manager who
will not give up control. It is not efficient for normal work to have to wait for approval from an
skill for any manager. Micromanagement prevents an organization from using the talents and skills
of the staff. Employees are hired because they have the knowledge and ability to do a job. If they
are constantly being hovered over by an oppressive manager, then they cannot do the jobs that they
were hired to do. Micromanagement creates a wait to be told culture as employees just wait until
it has to be done and then do what they are told to do. Micromanagement slows progress because
meetings must include the micromanager. Workers learn that if the micromanager has not signed
off on the project there is no use in moving forward unless it is done exactly the way the
community. Employees should be able to respond to coworkers and with the community without
being held hostage. If the answer is not correct, then it can be corrected. The damage that is caused
Micromanagement discourages teamwork. Workers do not work together; they just have
to work with the micromanager. Managers should encourage everyone in the organization to
constantly be innovating, communicating and improving and this cannot be done if the manager
cannot delegate and respect the work of his or her employees. In some situations, the
micromanager will assign work and then micromanage the work to enable the oppressive manager
to take credit for any positive results, and also to blame the employee for negative results. In this
scenario the micromanager actually delegates the accountability for failure to the worker without
giving them the ability to take initiative that might have made the project a success.
In the case of school in Malaysia, micromanagement take place in two situations. One is
from the school administrator towards teachers and the other is from the teachers towards the
pupils or students. It is safe to say that a proper balance and well managed level of
micromanagement is needed depending on the needs of the situation is necessary and might
produce desirable outcomes but excessive level might be harmful. Therefore, it is crucial for the
their clients. Pupils’/students’ needs analysis and teachers’ needs analysis are very crucial in
determining the level of intervention (micromanagement level) needed depending on the situation.
1. The Micromanagement Disease: Symptoms, Diagnosis, and Cure by Richard D. White, Jr.
2010
2. Lucas, S. L. (2011, August 15). Scientific proof that micro-management is bad for your
3. Hymowitz, C. (2003). "The Confident Boss Doesn’t Micromanage or Delegate Too Much".