Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Guideline
Patients with aplastic anaemia most commonly present Similarly, a careful occupational history of the patient may
with symptoms of anaemia and skin or mucosal haemor- reveal exposure to chemicals or pesticides that have been
rhage or visual disturbance due to retinal haemorrhage. associated with aplastic anaemia, as summarized in Table II.
Infection is a less common presentation. There is no
lymphadenopathy or hepatosplenomegaly (in the absence
of infection) and these findings strongly suggest another INVESTIGATIONS REQUIRED FOR DIAGNOSIS
The following investigations are required to (i) confirm the
Correspondence: BCSH Secretary, British Society for Haematology, diagnosis, (ii) exclude other possible causes of pancytopenia
2 Carlton House Terrace, London SW1Y 5AF, UK. with a hypocellular bone marrow, (iii) exclude congenital
E-mail: janice@bshhya.demon.co.uk
such as MDS, leukaemia and PNH. When children approach Their use will lead to delay in giving specific treatment,
adult age, arrangements should be made for their sub- during which time the patient may become infected or
sequent transfer to an adult unit for continued follow-up. alloimmunized (Marsh et al, 1994a).
Corticosteroids are ineffective, they encourage bacterial The recommendations for specific treatment of aplastic
and fungal colonization, and can precipitate serious gastro- anaemia are summarized in Figs 1 and 2.
intestinal haemorrhage in the presence of severe thromb-
ocytopenia. HLA-identical sibling donor transplantation
Recommendation 1. Results
Prednisolone should not be used to treat patients with Transplantation for SAA from an HLA-identical sibling
aplastic anaemia (Grade C recommendation; level IV donor is now very successful with a 75–90% chance of
evidence). long-term cure (Passweg et al, 1997; Storb et al, 1997;
Bacigalupo et al, 2000a). The incidence of graft rejection
has fallen from >30% before 1980 to around 5–10%.
Recommendation Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) remains a problem: the
Similarly, haemopoietic growth factors such as G-CSF probability of acute GVHD grade II–IV is 18 ± 3% and
and rHuEpo should not be used on their own in newly chronic GVHD of any grade is 26 ± 5%, for patients
diagnosed patients in the mistaken belief that they may transplanted after 1990, as reported to the International
cure the disease (Grade C recommendation; level IV Bone Marrow Transplant Registry (IBMTR) (Passweg et al,
evidence). 1997).
2. Indications for HLA-identical sibling BMT alternative donor transplants (Storb et al, 1997) and see
‘Matched unrelated donor bone marrow transplantation’.
For patients between the age of 40 and 45 years who (i)
Recommendation have failed immunosuppressive therapy with ATG and
Allogeneic BMT from an HLA-identical sibling donor is ciclosporin, (ii) have an HLA-compatible donor and (iii) are
the initial treatment of choice for newly diagnosed in good medical condition; BMT may be considered. (Grade
patients with aplastic anaemia if they B recommendation, level IIb evidence).
• have severe or very SAA (see ‘Definition of disease
severity based on the FBC and bone marrow findings’), 3. Conditioning and GVHD prophylaxis regimen
• are younger than 40 years (There is controversy The conditioning regimens and GVHD prophylaxis described
concerning the upper age limit for BMT. Results of below refer specifically to patients with acquired aplastic
BMT using an HLA-identical sibling donor are worse anaemia.
in patients >30 years of age compared with patients
<30 years of age (Bacigalupo et al, 2000a).
Recommendation
The decision whether to treat patients aged 30–40 years Patients with Fanconi’s anaemia and other types of
with ATG and ciclosporin or to transplant upfront should inherited aplastic anaemia need special consideration
take into account the patient’s general medical condition. and should not follow these pathways, as the condition-
Such patients should be considered for entry into the ing regimen and GVHD prophylaxis are completely
recently proposed randomized EBMT SAA study of standard different (Gluckman et al, 2000) (Grade B recommenda-
high dose cyclophosphamide and ATG versus fludarabine/ tion; level IIa evidence).
low dose cyclophosphamide/ATG recently recommended for
1. Results
Oral ciclosporin should be commenced on the last day of
The role of matched unrelated donor (MUD) BMT in the
prednisolone (day +14) at 5 mg/kg/d, aiming to keep the
treatment of SAA remains controversial due to the contin-
trough ciclosporin blood level between 150 and 250 lg/l
ued high morbidity and mortality from this procedure. A
for adults and between 100 and 150 lg/l for children. The
large number of patients analysed retrospectively from
blood pressure, renal and liver function tests should also be
combined sources (IBMTR, EBMTR, Seattle and a large UK
monitored regularly while on ciclosporin.
study) show long-term survival of around 30% with a high
Because response to ATG is delayed until 3 months,
incidence of graft rejection, GVHD and severe infections
patients will need to continue with regular blood product
(Hows et al, 2000). Similar results have been reported from
support during this time (see ‘Supportive care’ for details of
the National Marrow Donor Panel of the USA (Kernan et al,
prevention and treatment of infection).
1993), although more encouraging results have been
A second course of ATG is recommended if there is no
reported from Milwaukee (Margolis et al, 1996) and from
response or relapse after the first course. This should not be
Japan (Kodera et al, 1999) in children and young adults. In
given earlier than 3 months after the first course because it
many cases a myeloablative regimen incorporating, most
usually takes around 3 months before a response occurs.
frequently, irradiation has been employed. More recent data
There is a 60% chance of response to a second course
from relatively small numbers of patients show reduced
(Tichelli et al, 1998). One can either use rabbit ATG or
transplant related mortality when (i) only fully matched
horse ATG again, although there is a higher incidence of
donors or donors matched for HLA-DRB1 are used and
allergic reactions and earlier serum sickness if the same
(ii) non-myeloablative and therefore less toxic conditioning
preparation is used again. It is possible to consider giving a
is employed, such as low dose total body irradiation (Deeg
third course of ATG if there has been no response to two
et al, 1999, 2001; Vassiliou et al, 2001; Elebute et al, 2002)
courses and BMT is not an option, or if the patient has
or more immunosuppressive regimens incorporating flud-
relapsed after previous courses. As when giving a second
arabine (Bacigalupo et al, 2002).
course of ATG, a test dose must always be given beforehand,
There have been no prospective randomized studies of
and if there is no severe reaction one can then proceed with
MUD BMT in aplastic anaemia due to the rarity of the
the full dose.
disease, but the EBMT SAA Working Party has recently
proposed a standard conditioning protocol of fludarabine,
4. Definition of response
low dose cyclophosphamide and ATG, with short course of
There has previously been no agreement on measurement
both ciclosporin and methotrexate as GVHD prophylaxis,
of response to immunosuppressive therapy, with the result
based on the pilot study of Bacigalupo et al (2002). A
that it has been difficult to compare response rates. New
similar protocol has been recommended by the BSBMT, the
criteria for response have recently been accepted by an
only difference being the option to use Campath-1H instead
expert committee on aplastic anaemia, and these are
of ATG (see later).
summarized in Table V. Responses should be confirmed by
two or more blood counts at least 4 weeks apart, and should
ideally be measured in patients who are not receiving Recommendation
haemopoietic growth factors (Camitta, 2000). The current EBMT SAA Working Party view is to avoid
irradiation in children and young adults, even at low
5. Follow-up of patients post-ATG doses, and to use fludarabine instead (Grade B recom-
Following treatment with ATG and ciclosporin, patients mendation; level IIa evidence).
should be monitored carefully with regular FBC for
APPENDIX 1
Classification of evidence levels
*Refers to a situation in which implementation is outside the control of the investigators, but an opportunity exists to evaluate its effect.
A Requires at least one randomized controlled trial as part of a body of literature of overall good quality and Evidence
consistency addressing specific recommendation levels Ia, Ib
B Requires the availability of well-conducted clinical studies but no randomized clinical trials on the topic Evidence
of recommendation levels IIa, IIb, III
C Requires evidence obtained from expert committee reports or opinions and/or clinical experiences of respected Evidence level IV
authorities. Indicates an absence of directly applicable clinical studies of good quality