Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Dang Khanh
Nguyen Hong Thanh
Mi i t off Agricultural
Ministry A i lt l and d rurall development
d l t
Outline
1
1. Currentt status
C t t off
agricultural waste
g
management in
Vietnam
2. Agricultural waste
managementt
policies
3 Potential on co-
3.
benefit from
agricultural waste
managementt
4. Recommendation
Role of Agricultural sector in Vietnam
Agriculture has contributed to
GDP (gross domestic
production) 22,09 % (2008),
20 % (2009)
CCrop residue
id
agricultural wastes - after harvesting rice straw,
cane trash
trash, peanut shell
shell, corn leaves and cobs
cobs,
cassava stem, coconut shell and leaves, etc,
agro-industrial
g residues,, i.e. residues that are
resulted from following processing on rice husks,
biogases, cassava peels, peanut shells, coffee
husks,
husks
Hazardous wastes: excess fertilizers and
pesticides
Animals wastes
Current status and problems
of utilization of Crop residues
Crop residue
C id iis over 70
million tons per year
Crop residue used for:
Organic source by
burning g and burying
y g
Cattle feed
Animal-pen padding
Mushroom
production
Cooking
C ki
Utensil making
Compost production
Straw R
Resource
Utilization
Straw power Feed directly
Resource
Returning to field
Bio-char directly
Fertilizer utilization
es
Ret rning to
Returning
field indirectly
Direct burning
Raw materials of Industrial raw
paper making materials Cultivation of
edible fungi
Building
materials
by 2007,
2007 total chemical was about 2
2,4
4 billion tons and by 5 times
compared to 1985
3 Pi
Pig 26560651 2 19 389 275 230
19.389.275.230
Total: 61.509.431.686
it is only 40% of total solid waste were treated and rest of them were discharged
directly into environment
environment. This is source of air pollution has caused by CO2, NO2 and
it is a notable contributing factor to global warming and climate change.
there are only 12% of total centrals built a waste water treatment system and 74 % of
animal farms are using measures of waste management and in among that 64%
applied Bioagas and composting as main treating method
Up to now, more than 100,000 biogas systems have been built, most of them are of
small scale (with financial support from different sources).
sources) A number of large systems
are constructed in recent years.
Wastes, 2,500 , 2%
Change of land use
and forestry ,
Industry, 3,800 , 4%
19,380 , 19%
Agriculture, 52,450 ,
Energy, 25,600 , 50%
25%
Co benefits Approach
Co-benefits
C b
Co-benefits
fit refers
f to
t multiple
lti l b benefits
fit iin diff
differentt fifields
ld resulting
lti ffrom one policy,
li
strategy or action plan
Source: http://www.kyomecha.org/cobene/e/cobene.html
Co benefits: 2 definitions
Co-benefits:
Co-benefits
Co benefits from the global Co-benefits
Co benefits from the Asian
climate change perspective: regional/local perspective:
additional benefits beyond GHG additional GHG reductions
reductions
d ti resulting
lti ffrom climate
li t resulting
lti from
f measures aimed
i d
change mitigation measures to address
Sources: Sophie Punte, Clean Air Initiative for Asian Cities Center (CAI-Asia), January 2009
Biogas production
Animal dung
Biogas plant
Co-benefits
Co benefits in biogas project
Secondary Co
Co-benefits:
benefits:
Reduced smoke inside kitchen and enhanced health by
improving sanitation, hygiene, living conditions
Mitigating climate change
increased yield by using bio-fertilizer
Improved soil quality by using bio-slurry
R d
Reduced d pressure on fforests
t
Reduced work load for women and children – enhance
education opportunities and cultural knowledge
P i i d off skill
Provisied kill enhancement
h t andd employment
l t ffor rurall
areas
Co-benefits
Development
needs GHG reduction
Technical barriers
Research & Development: lack of research and development
to continuously improve and innovate the technology to
improve efficiency and additional end uses for income-
generating activities;
O i t ti off the
Orientation th construction
t ti companies: i th companies
the i
engaged in plant construction have some negligence about
the quality control and after-sale-service.
Policies barriers and social awareness
Lack of detail regulation on renewable energy and incentive
mechanisms
h i to
t users and d business
b i operate
t iin bi
biogas fi
field
ld
Low awareness on potential co-benefits on biogas projects
Recommendations
Complete
C l t llegall fframework
k ffor managing
i agricultural
i lt l wastes,
t
approach 3R should be considered as a priority orientation.
Research and Development of biogas/compost fertilizer
production
d ti is i encouraged d ffor reducing
d i environmental
i t l pollution
ll ti
and effective exploitation of clean energy
Improve knowledge and awareness of community
Enhance financial for managemental activities and science
research
Create policy forums to discuss co co-benefits
benefits approach with
participation from decision-makers at different levels of
governance (regional, national and local)..
Enhance international Co-operation
Co operation and exchange experiences