PeowplE vZ. cUz+od!0wh et aL.

f@cTS:

apP3lLu@ntZ jEJeJeje, v@L3NtIn cUst0di0h and hiZ Tw0W BROth3rS JejejejE

♥♥♥♥♥, towmAs anD s!lVeSTr3 jEj3jej3, zeeK reV3rs@L 0F ah jUdG3ment of THe
court of f!RsT 1Nz+ance of quezown. sen+3nCiNg them 2 R3Clus!on p3rpetuAH F0r
TH3 murD3r 0f meLAn!OWh V@lanc!0h. wH3R31n the AcCusED zhot thE V!C+im
fROM v3hIND @t the LuAtT3R’Z HouS3 dur!ng nYT+ime jejEj3j3. wh!le th3 v1c+iM
wAz sTua6GERIng zeVER@l sh0TZ w3re fiRED by S!lvezTR3 h1T+!Ng The
vIcTiMzzszzZ, hu l8r Died powZ ♥♥♥♥♥. @PP3llANt’S mua!N aLiBeh that tH3Y w3r3
IN tAysAn JejejeJe ♥♥♥♥♥, ba+aNGAz A+ TH3 tIM3 0f th3 ♥ xD ♥ crimE.

isSu3 loLz:

won c0wnsp1racy waS pR3z3Nt DUr!nG the cr!mE W@z ♥ xD ♥ c0mMI++3d

hELd lolz: cOnzp!r@cY in tHE Caze at bar Iz not pR3ZenT coZ it w@S mErElEh
1NF3rRed fRoWm ThE @ctz 0f th3 accused In THE p3rP3trati0n owF TH3 Crime p0wZ
♥♥♥♥♥. alSowH theRe WU@s NOh pR0OWf 0n how @nd wHen th3 pluaN 2 k!lL
MEl@nIoh Wuas ♥ xD ♥ H@tcHEd p0wz, 0r wHat Tim3 eLapZE bef0R3 !t Was
caRRI3d ♥ xD ♥ 0ut P0Wz. cOurt ALZ0H dId N0T find the @libeh AdEQu8t3
R3UaS0n 2 rev3rs3 tHE decisiown C0z Of 1+Z !nc0nz1sT3Nci3z aNd tH3
pr0secUtiOn’z CR3d!bl3 wi+nesZez ♥♥♥♥♥. th3 C0ur+ H0wEver M0d1f!3D th3
decISi0WN 2 The correCT penaltY 0F murd3R qUaL1f13d B3y TreAcHeR3Y @nd
aWArD!ng ThE defenD@n+z the MIT!gatinG C!RcUMztAnCe 0wF VowluN+uAREh
zuRrenD3R powz. H3ncE JEj3jejE ♥♥♥♥♥, THe cOrReCt p3naL+eh !z r3cLusion
tEmp0R@l !n 1tS maximUm De6RE3

Joke.. page 2 yung tunay

People vs. Custodio et al.

Facts:

Appellants, Valentin Custodio and his two brothers, Tomas and Silvestre, seek reversal of
a judgement of the court of first instance of quezon. Sentencing them to reclusion
perpetua for the murder of melanio balancio. Wherein the accused shot the victim from
behind at the latter’s house during nighttime. While the victim was staggering several
shots were fired by Silvestre hitting the victim, who later died. Appellant’s main alibi that
they were in Taysan, Batangas at the time of the crime.

Issue:

WON conspiracy was present during the crime was committed

Held: Conspiracy in the case at bar is not present because it was merely inferred from the
acts of the accused in the perpetration of the crime. Also there was no proof on how and
when the plan to kill melanio was hatched, or what time elapse before it was carried out.
Court also did not find the alibi adequate reason to reverse the decision because of its
inconsistencies and the prosecution’s credible witnesses. The court however modified the
decision to the correct penalty of murder qualified by treachery and awarding the
defendants the mitigating circumstance of voluntary surrender. Hence, the correct penalty
is Reclusion temporal in its maximum degree