JUDICIAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JUDGE J.

ANTHONY MILLER

Judge J. Anthony Miller has committed many violations of the Code of

Judicial Conduct. He has committed gross neglect of duty, and I believe he is and
has been corrupt in and collaborated outside the courtroom. He has demonstrated
gross partiality and oppression.

STATEMENT OF FACTS

1. On June 4, 2014, Winston Frost filed a Petition for Dissolution of

Marriage in in Tulsa County Oklahoma District Court, and it became Case #FD-
2014-1476. It was unsigned, had a fraudulent notary, and was perjured as he did
not meet the residence or domicile requirements for a divorce in Oklahoma. The
court did not have subject matter jurisdiction.
2. On January 5, 2015, a so-called “mediation” was held in Case #FD-
2014-1476 by Winston Frost’s attorney, Michon Hughes, with me and a Tulsa,
Oklahoma judge/mediator. He was not the judge in the case. There was no
documentation to show that the “mediator” was “Judge J. Anthony Miller” or that
a mediation even took place. The meeting was allegedly an attempt for a quick
resolution. The “mediator” gained personal knowledge of disputed evidentiary
facts concerning the proceeding. When I attempted to speak during the informal
conference, the mediator (Judge J. Anthony Miller) yelled at me to “SHUT UP.”
Judge J. Anthony Miller had ex parte discussions with Michon Hughes and
obtained information about disputed facts in the case. This meeting with Judge J.
Anthony Miller was put together behind the scenes by Michon Miller Hughes and
her friend attorney.

1
 3. On or about January 20, 2016, a “Judge Miller” was assigned to be the
judge in Case #FD-2014-1476, taking over for Judge James W. Keeley. This was
announced in a January 5, 2016 docket entry: “COURT RECOGNIZES THAT IN
A FEW WEEKS JUDGE MILLER WILL BE ASSIGNED TO THE DOCKET
AND ACCORDINGLY, SETS A CONTINUED PRETRIAL CONFERENCE
BEFORE JUDGE MILLER SO HE CAN FAMILIARIZE HIMSELF WITH THE
ISSUES. COURT WILL SET TRIAL AT THIS TIME TO ACCOMMODATE
THE RESPONDENT AS SHE TRAVELS THOUSANDS OF MILES TO
APPEAR IN COURT.” [emphasis added.]
4. On February 11, 2016, I filed a NOTICE OF TERMINATION OF
COUNSEL. This was ignored by Judge J. Anthony Miller. This demonstrated
bias against me as a party and as a pro se party. He denied one of my most
fundamental rights.
5. On February 17, 2016, I filed a MOTION TO STRIKE PETITION
FOR DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE. The Petition for Dissolution of Marriage
was unsigned. The Petition for Dissolution of Marriage was fraudulently
notarized. The Court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to grant a divorce in the
case of two New Hampshire residents. The Court denied my Motion to Strike the
Petition for Dissolution of Marriage in total violation of Oklahoma statutes. There
was no factual or legal basis whatsoever for the actions of Judge J. Anthony Miller;
the only explanation for his actions is extreme bias and corruption.
6. On February 17, 2016, I filed a MOTION FOR CONTEMPT. Judge
J. Anthony Miller felt grounds were raised for a contempt trial, but he overruled
the Motion as to the attorneys. This demonstrated his prejudice for his friends and
fellow attorneys as there was no basis to wipe out the wrongdoing of the dishonest

2
attorneys in this matter. The attorneys committed more wrongdoing than Winston
Frost including the criminal act of a fraudulent notary.
7. On February 17, 2016, I filed a NOTICE OF FILING OF
PROPOSED ORDERS ON MOTION TO STRIKE PETITION FOR
DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE. This proposed order and ALL proposed orders
submitted by me were ignored while improper orders submitted by Michon Hughes
were embraced by the Court.
8. On February 17, 2016, I filed an APPLICATION FOR
AMENDMENT TO PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE ORDER. Judge J. Anthony
Miler ignored the inadequate assistance of counsel or corruption by my former
attorneys and the fact that I did not approve the Pre-Trial Conference Order.
9. On February 17, 2016, I filed a NOTICE OF FILING OF PETITION
FOR DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE IN NEW HAMPSHIRE. The Court
ignored this.
10. On February 18, 2016, the Court entered the following minutes on the
Docket: “MILLER, J. ANTHONY: ORDER SIGNED AND ENTERED. THE
COURT, IN PREPARATION FOR THIS CASE AND AS PART OF ITS
OVERSIGHT OF THIS CASE, HAS REVIEWED THE STATUS OF THIS
CASE BASED UPON THE PLEADINGS IN THE COURT FILE. THE COURT,
ON ITS OWN MOTION, FINDS AND ORDERS THAT THE PRETRIAL
CONFERENCE ORDER AND ALL PENDING HEARING DATES ARE
STRICKEN. THE COURT SETS THIS CASE FOR HEARING TO REVIEW
THE STATUS OF DISCOVERY, ATTORNEY VAUGHN'S REQUEST TO
WITHDRAW, AND ALL PENDING MOTIONS. THE STATUS/REVIEW
HEARING SHALL OCCUR ON THE 29TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2016 AT
11:00 AM IN ROOM 349, TULSA COUNTY COURTHOUSE. THE
3
RESPONDENT MAY APPEAR AT THIS HEARING (ONLY) BY
TELECONFERENCE, PROVIDED THAT SHE NOTIFY THE COURT IN
WRITING AT LEAST FIVE DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING OF HER
TELEPHONE NUMBER.”
11. On February 24, 2016, I filed a MOTION TO COMPEL
PETITIONER TO RELEASE INSURANCE PAYMENT TO TANYA
HATHAWAY. This denied me money that I badly need. There was no legal basis
whatsoever to deny me my money, and it was against the ATI. My money that is
rightfully due me was hijacked by Winston Frost and Michon Hughes, and Judge J.
Anthony Miller aided and abetted them in this “theft.”
12. On February 24, 2016, I filed a MOTION TO ALLOW SERVICE
AND COMMUNICATIONS BY EMAIL TO MICHON HUGHES. The Court
denied normal communications with the attorney for the Petitioner with no factual
or legal basis whatsoever. This increased my costs substantially as well as the time
I have to spend on legal matters. I have literally spent days driving to and from
post offices. There was no proof of needing to limit to mail; only accusations made
by another attorney; one he seems to notoriously side with and yet I have not had
the right to compel the burden of proof of the attorney false accusations that
compelled the judge to make such a ruling.
13. On February 24, 2016, I filed an AFFIDAVIT OF TANYA
HATHAWAY DATED FEBRUARY 22, 2016. Judge J. Anthony Miller ignored
the facts in this affidavit, my other affidavits, and in my verified filings. The only
explanation for this is extreme bias.
14. On February 24, 2016, I filed an EMERGENCY REQUEST FOR
ATTENDANCE OF WITNESSES TO BE COMPELLED FOR HEARING

4
SCHEDULED FEBRUARY 29, 2016. Judge J. Anthony Miller ignored this
request, and I was denied the witnesses that would have proven the necessary facts.
15. On February 18, 2016, the Court entered the following minutes on the
Docket: “MILLER, J. ANTHONY: HEARING TO REVIEW THE STATUS OF
DISCOVERY, W. ALLEN VAUGHN'S REQUEST TO WITHDRAW, AND ALL
PENDING MOTIONS HELD ON THE RECORD WITH JUDY BROWN,
COURT REPORTER. PETITIONER DOES NOT REQUEST ANY FURTHER
DISCOVERY. PETITIONER HAS 30 DAYS TO RESPOND (BY 03-30-16) TO
DISCOVERY ISSUES BY W. ALLEN VAUGHN. W. ALLEN VAUGHN
ALLOWED TO WITHDRAW. RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO STRIKE
PETITION FOR DISSOLUTION OVERRULED. RESPONDENT'S MOTION
TO ALLOW SERVICE AND COMMUNICATION BY EMAIL OVERRULED.
RESPONDENT'S CONTEMPT AGAINST THE PETITIONER
CONSOLIDATED WITH TRIAL. RESPONDENT'S MOTION FOR
SANCTIONS/CONTEMPT AGAINST COUNSEL OVERRULED.
PETITIONER'S CONTEMPT AGAINST THE RESPONDENT
CONSOLIDATED WITH TRIAL. RESPONDENT'S EMERGENCY REQUEST
FOR WITNESSES FOR 02-29-16 HEARING DENIED. RESPONDENT'S
MOTION TO AMEND PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ORDER GRANTED AS TO
THE ISSUES OF NECESSITY AND AMOUNT OF SUPPORT ALIMONY AND
RESPONDENT'S MEDICAL EXPENSES. COURT TO REVIEW THE ISSUE
OF JURISDICTION AND ISSUE A RULING ACCORDINGLY.
RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO COMPEL INSURANCE PAYMENTS
CONSOLIDATED WITH TRIAL. PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SET 04-04-16 AT
10;30 AM. BOTH PARTIES WILL NEED TO PROVIDE EXHIBITS
NOTEBOOKS WITH MARKED EXHIBITS. RESPONDENT TO PROVIDE
5
UPDATED LIST OF EXHIBITS TO MICHON HUGHES BY 03-30-16.
MICHON HUGHES TO PROVIDE UPDATED PRETRIAL CONFERENCE
ORDER. TRIAL TO BE HELD ON 04-05-16 AND 04-06-16 AS ORIGINALLY
SCHEDULED. PETITIONER NOT PRESENT, REPRESENTED BY MICHON
HUGHES AND DARRAH HAWORTH, BOTH PRESENT. RESPONDENT,
PRESENT VIA TELEPHONE, REPRESENTED BY W ALLEN VAUGHN,
PRESENT.” This was an outrageous ruling that clearly demonstrates bias. The
law REQUIRED that the Petition for Dissolution of Marriage be stricken. There
was no basis to deny contempt and sanctions against the dishonest attorneys in this
case. There was no basis to deny my discovery requests. There was no basis to
ignore the issues and facts that I had presented. I was also denied my right to be
sworn in to testify.
16. On February 29, 2016, Judge J. Anthony Miller conducted a
telephonic hearing in Case #FD-2014-1476. There were no other hearings held
until the Pre-Trial Conference on April 4, 2016. I asked to be sworn in, and he
denied me that.
17. On March 2, 2016, I filed a REQUEST FOR JURY TRIAL. The
Court denied my request for a jury trial though there is no Oklahoma statute that
conflicts with the Oklahoma Constitution’s guarantee of the right to a jury trial.
18. On March 2, 2016, I filed a MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF
JURISDICTION. The Court overruled my Motion to Dismiss for Lack of
Jurisdiction on completely bogus grounds. The Court ruled that I had waived
personal jurisdiction when the motion related solely to subject matter jurisdiction.
This ruling was issued solely out of bias against me.
19. On March 2, 2016, I filed a REQUEST FOR FINDINGS OF FACT
AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW ON DENIAL OF MOTION TO STRIKE
6
PETITION FOR DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE. This Court denied my
motions without findings of fact or conclusions of law. The Court then refused to
provide legal or factual justification for its orders when subsequently requested.
20. On March 4, 2016, the Court entered the following minutes on the
Docket: “MILLER, J. ANTHONY: RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO DISMISS
FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION IS OVERRULED. RESPONDENT WAIVED
ANY OBJECTION TO LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION BY REASON
OF HER ANSWER AND COUNTERMOTION FILED AUGUST 19, 2014.”
21. On March 7, 2016, I filed a MOTION TO VACATE OR MODIFY
ORDER OF PROTECTION. This has been ignored, and I have been wrongfully
restrained.
22. On March 7, 2016, I filed a REQUEST FOR FINDINGS OF FACT
AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW ON DENIAL OF MOTION FOR CONTEMPT
AGAINST ATTORNEY'S. Denied as Judge J, Anthony Miller had no legal basis
for such a ruling.
23. On March 7, 2016, I filed a REQUEST FOR FINDINGS OF FACT
AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW ON APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT TO
PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE ORDER. This was denied as Judge J, Anthony
Miller had no legal basis for such a ruling, so he couldn’t admit that in writing.
24. On March 7, 2016, I filed a MOTION TO COMPEL PAYMENT OF
PROPERTY TAXES. This was denied as Judge J, Anthony Miller demonstrated
his overwhelming bias knowing that eviction could be imminent. He flat out
ignored that fact and just swept it aside.
25. On March 7, 2016, the Court entered the following minutes on the
Docket: “MILLER, J. ANTHONY: THE COURT HAS READ AND
CONSIDERED THE RESPONDENT'S REQUEST FOR JURY TRIAL.
7
ALTHOUGH OKLAHOMA LAW DOES NOT PROVIDE FOR A JURY TRIAL
IN DIVORCE CASES, THE RIGHT TO A JURY TRIAL DOES EXIST AS TO
INDIRECT CONTEMPT OF COURT. THE COURT HAS REVIEWED AND
CONSIDERED THE PETITIONER'S APPLICATION FOR INDIRECT
CONTEMPT CITATION DATED MARCH 17, 2015. THAT APPLICATION
SEEKS A PENAL SANCTION AS OPPOSED TO A REMEDIAL SANCTION.
THEREFORE, THE RESPONDENT'S REQUEST FOR JURY TRIAL IS
GRANTED AS TO THE CONTEMPT ACTION AGAINST THE RESPONDENT
ONLY, WITHOUT PAYMENT OF A JURY FEE. THOMAS V. BARROW, 2007
OK CIV APP 35. THE DATE FOR THE CONTEMPT TRIAL WILL BE SET
FOLLOWING THE APRIL 5 AND APRIL 6 BENCH TRIAL IN THIS
MATTER. RESPONDENT'S REQUESTS FOR FINDINGS OF FACT AND
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AS TO (1) DENIAL OF MOTION TO STRIKE
FILED 3/2/16; (2) DENIAL OF MOTION FOR CONTEMPT FILED 3/7/16,
AND (3) APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT TO PRETRIAL CONFERENCE
ORDER, ARE OVERRULED. 12 OS § 611 APPLIES ONLY TO BENCH
TRIALS AND HEARINGS OF DISPUTED FACTS. BEEN V. MK
ENTERPRISE, INC., 2011 OK CIV APP 70. THE COURT HAS RECEIVED
RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO VACATE OR MODIFY ORDER OF
PROTECTION FILED 3/7/16. THE COURT'S ORDER OF 8/21/15 RESERVED
THIS ISSUE FOR TRIAL. THE RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO COMPEL
PAYMENT OF PROPERTY TAXES FILED 3/7/16 IS RESERVED FOR
TRIAL.” Four orders were issued on March 9, 2016. These decisions demonstrate
the overwhelming bias of Judge J. Anthony Miller.
26. On March 10, 2016, I filed a MOTION TO FILE FINANCIAL
RECORDS UNDER SEAL FOR EN CAMERA INSPECTION MOTION TO
8
FILE FINANCIAL RECORDS UNDER SEAL FOR EN CAMERA
INSPECTION. It was denied for no reason whatsoever.
27. On March 10, 2016, I filed a MOTION TO FILE MEDICAL
RECORDS UNDER SEAL FOR EN CAMERA INSPECTION. It was denied for
no reason whatsoever. This information is protected by a variety of laws, so there
was no basis to force me to make it public. The medical information was
essential to support my request for accommodations under the Americans
with Disabilities Act, which was ignored.
28. On March 10, 2016, I filed an EMERGENCY MOTION TO PERMIT
ADDITIONAL DISCOVERY. This was ignored. This violates my due process
rights and demonstrates the terminal bias of Judge J. Anthony Miller.
29. On March 10, 2016, I filed a REQUEST FOR SCHEDULING
CHANGE. It was denied for no reason whatsoever. This demonstrates the
terminal bias of Judge J. Anthony Miller.
30. On March 10, 2016, I filed a REQUEST FOR FINDINGS OF FACT
AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW ON MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF
JURISDICTION. It was denied for no reason whatsoever. This demonstrates the
terminal bias of Judge J. Anthony Miller.
31. On March 16, 2016, I filed an AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF
MOTION TO VACATE SUMMARY JUDGMENT. It was ignored for no reason
whatsoever. This demonstrates the terminal bias of Judge J. Anthony Miller.
32. On March 16, 2016, I filed a MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF
SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION. The Court overruled my Motion to
Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction on completely bogus grounds. The
Court ruled that Judicial Estoppel applied, when it is not applicable. This
demonstrates the terminal bias of Judge J. Anthony Miller.
9
 33. On March 21, 2016, I filed a MOTION FOR SANCTIONS
PURSUANT TO 12 OK STAT 12-2011 (2014). It was ignored for no reason
whatsoever. This demonstrates the terminal bias of Judge J. Anthony Miller.
34. On March 21, 2016, I filed an AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF
MOTION FOR SANCTIONS. It was ignored for no reason whatsoever. This
demonstrates the terminal bias of Judge J. Anthony Miller.
35. On March 21, 2016, I filed a MOTION FOR STAY OF DIVORCE
TRIAL. It was denied for no reason whatsoever. This violates my due process
rights. This demonstrates the terminal bias of Judge J. Anthony Miller.
36. On March 22, 2016, I filed an EMERGENCY MOTION FOR
HEARING AND BRIEF IN SUPPORT. It was ignored for no reason whatsoever.
This demonstrates the terminal bias of Judge J. Anthony Miller.
37. On March 24, 2016, I filed an APPLICATION FOR INDIRECT
CONTEMPT CITATION. It was ignored for no reason whatsoever. This
demonstrates the terminal bias of Judge J. Anthony Miller.
38. On March 24, 2016, I filed a MOTION FOR TEMPORARY ORDER
REGARDING ATTORNEY'S FEES. It was denied for no reason whatsoever.
This demonstrates the terminal bias of Judge J. Anthony Miller.
39. On March 24, 2016, I filed a MOTION FOR SERVICE. This was
ignored in total violation of due process rights. Judge J. Anthony Miller blocked
my legal right to have Winston Frost served with a summons in a lawsuit.
40. On March 24, 2016, I filed a MOTION FOR STAY. It was ignored
for no reason whatsoever. This demonstrates the terminal bias of Judge J. Anthony
Miller.

10
 41. On March 24, 2016, I filed an AMENDED MOTION FOR STAY OF
DIVORCE TRIAL – EMERGENCY. It was ignored for no reason whatsoever.
This demonstrates the terminal bias of Judge J. Anthony Miller.
42. On March 24, 2016, I filed a REQUEST FOR PERMISSION TO
FILE AMENDED ANSWER. It was ignored for no reason whatsoever. This
demonstrates the terminal bias of Judge J. Anthony Miller.
43. On March 24, 2016, I filed a MOTION TO COMPEL INITIAL
DISCLOSURES AND MOTION FOR SANCTIONS. It was ignored for no
reason whatsoever. This demonstrates the terminal bias of Judge J. Anthony
Miller.
44. On March 31, 2016, I filed an APPLICATION FOR INDIRECT
CONTEMPT CITATION FOR DARRAH V HAYWORTH. It was ignored for no
reason whatsoever. This demonstrates the terminal bias of Judge J. Anthony
Miller.
45. On April 4, 2016, I appeared in court for the first time before Judge J.
Anthony Miller in Case #FD-2014-1476. I immediately realized that he had
been the would-be “mediator” in the case. I was not represented by counsel,
was extremely ill, and was taking medications that inhibited my ability to
think clearly. I was mentally unable to ask for his recusal and a mistrial. I
passed out in the hall of the courthouse, had my blood oxygen content
registered at 10 and was taken by paramedics to the hospital while Judge J.
Anthony Miller was ordering me back to the courtroom. I learned of the bias
of Judge J. Anthony Miller and grounds for disqualification only as the pre-
trial conference and trial occurred in Case #FD-2014-1476. I was unaware of
this significant grounds for the disqualification of the trial judge prior to the
trial.
11
 46. On April 4, 2016, the Court entered a PRETRIAL CONFERENCE
ORDER. My motion in this regard was ignored for no reason whatsoever. This
demonstrates the terminal bias of Judge J. Anthony Miller.
47. On April 4, 2016, I filed an EMERGENCY MOTION FOR
CONTINUANCE AND MOTION FOR PARTICIPATION PENDING PRE-
TRIAL HEARING AND CONFERENCES BY TELEPHONE. It was ignored for
no reason whatsoever. This demonstrates the terminal bias of Judge J. Anthony
Miller.
48. On April 4, 2016, the Court entered the following Minutes:
“MILLER, J. ANTHONY: PRETRIAL CONFERENCE HELD ON THE
RECORD WITH LANA GOTCHER, COURT REPORTER. PARTIES
EXCHANGED EXHIBIT NOTEBOOKS. PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ORDER
ENTERED WITH COURT'S CHANGES. ALL CONTEMPTS STRICKEN
FROM THIS TRIAL AND WILL BE RESET FOR JURY TRIAL. ISSUE OF
ATTORNEY FEES RESERVED, COURT MAY TAKE UP AT TRIAL.
RESPONDENT NEEDS TO SUBMIT CONTEMPT CITATION IIF SHE
HAS IT. RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO VACATE FINAL PROTECTIVE
ORDER RESERVED TO LATER DATE. COURT ENTERED ORDER
NUNC PRO TUNC SIGNED AND ENTERED. PETITIONER PRESENT
SHE HAS NOT ALREADY DONE SO. RESPONDENT'S RESPONSES TO
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS ADDED TO
RESPONDENT'S EXHIBIT LIST. MICHON HUGHES WILL BRING
APPRAISAL ENTED BY MICHON HUGHES, BOTH PRESENT.
RESPONDENT PRO SE, PRESENT.”
49. On April 5, 2016, the Court entered the following Minutes:
“MILLER, J. ANTHONY: TRIAL (DAY 1 OF 2) HELD ON THE RECORD
12
WITH TAMI MORSE, COURT REPORTER. HEARING HELD ON
RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR SUBJECT MATTER
JURISDICTION. TWO WITNESSES SWORN, TESTIMONY TAKEN.
COURT FINDS THAT PETITIONER WAS A RESIDENT OF OKLAHOMA
FOR 6 MONTHS AND 30 DAYS IN TULSA COUNTY PRECEDING
FILING OF THE DIVORCE PETITION. (2) CONTEMPT CITATIONS
SIGNED AND ENTERED. ARRAIGNMENT HELD. PETITIONER
ENTERED PLEA OF NOT GUILTY AND RESERVED JURY TRIAL.
PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ON ALL CONTEMPTS TO BE SET AT A
LATER DATE. PETITIONER REPRESENTED BY MICHON HASTINGS
HUGHES AND CLINTON HASTINGS, ALL PRESENT. RESPONDENT
PRO SE, PRESENT.”
50. On April 6, 2016, I filed an EMERGENCY MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION REGARDING THIS COURT'S DENIAL OF TANYA
HATAHAWAY'S MOTION TO DISMISS DUE TO LACK OF SUBJECT
MATTER JURISDICTION, AND BRIEF IN SUPPORT.
51. On April 6, 2016, the Court entered the following Minutes:
“MILLER, J. ANTHONY: TRIAL (DAY 2 OF 2) HELD ON THE RECORD
WITH TAMI MORSE, COURT REPORTER. RESPONDENT'S
EMERGENCY MOTION TO RECONSIDER DENIED. RESPONDENT'S
ORAL MOTION TO STAY OR DELAY THE TRIAL DENIED. DIVORCE
GRANTED ON THE GROUNDS OF INCOMPATIBILITY. COURT ENTERED
ORDER AWARDING PERSONAL PROPERTY TO BOTH PARTIES.
RESPONDENT'S REQUEST FOR ALIMONY DENIED. $7,394 INSURANCE
CHECK AWARDED TO THE RESPONDENT. PHILBRICK HOME
PREVIOUSLY AWARDED TO THE PETITIONER AS SEPARATE
13
PROPERTY, HOWEVER, COURT AWARDS INCREASED VALUE OF THE
HOME TO THE RESPONDENT BASED UPON HER CONTRIBUTIONS.
COURT ENTERED ORDER ON OUTSTANDING DEBTS. RESPONDENT IS
ORDERED TO VACATE THE PHILBRICK HOME BY 05-06-16 AT 5 PM.
PETITIONER HAS AGREED TO PROVIDE THE MOVING COSTS TO BE
PAID DIRECTLY TO THE MOVING COMPANY WITHIN 30 MILES OF THE
PHILBRICK HOME. ATTORNEY FEES RESERVED. ALL FUNDS TO BE
AWARDED ARE TO BE HELD IN ESCROW PENDING THE ATTORNEY
FEE HEARING. PETITIONER AWARDED THE ITEMS STIPULATED TO
PREVIOUSLY. RESPONDENT'S REQUEST FOR MEDICAL EXPENSES
DENIED. COURT'S FULL DECISION IS ON THE RECORD. MICHON
HASTINGS HUGHES TO DRAFT THE DECREE; PRESENTMENT OF THE
DECREE SET 04-07-16 AT 1:15 PM. RESPONDENT ENTERED PLEA OF
NOT GUILTY AND RESERVED JURY TRIAL. PETITIONER REPRESENTED
BY MICHON HASTINGS HUGHES AND CLINTON HASTINGS, ALL
PRESENT. RESPONDENT PRO SE, PRESENT.”
52. Prior to the divorce hearing, was assured by Judge J. Anthony Miller
during the telephone conference, that matters that were defaulted on April 6,
2016 would be dealt with in advance to any final decree. Judge J. Anthony
Miller did not address these matters which significantly affects the case law
and rulings in the divorce decree. I traveled once again, 1500 miles one way
for matters before the court to include an order of protection against me.
Matter before the Court that defaulted in favor of my opposition that
day:
A. ORDER OF PROTECTION The order of protection is fraud and
stated my address as living in Oklahoma when I live in New Hampshire
14
 and never in Tulsa or Oklahoma, yet the judge continued to ignore that
my address was wrong and the OOP was filled with lies not to mention
my residence.
B. TEMPORARY ORDERS for the divorce
C. SUMMARY JUDGMENT regarding the marital residence
although my Answer had reached the Court that day, were ignored.
D. CONTEMPT defaulted and it is all lies just like the OOP
There were many matters on the docket for April 6, 2016 and I was in
Tulsa for the hearing. I had a major panic/anxiety attack and came to
the court later that day and was acknowledged by the Judge.
Before I left to come back to New Hampshire, I filed Motions to
Vacate the Defaults in all the matters before the court that day knowing
that it is a fundamental right to be heard fairly and my medical
emergency was suffice to have a re-hearing.
Judge Miller continued to ignore these matters and many others before
him and yet initially when he extended the initial conference, he stated it
was to thoroughly review the case. Judge Miller did not let these
matters be heard as he had promised they would PRIOR to any divorce
trial and final decree.
53. The actions of Judge J. Anthony Miller on April 4, 5, 6, and 7,
2016 in Case #FD-2014-1476 were beyond outrageous. He forced me to
participate in hearings and a trial when I was physically, mentally, and
emotionally incapable. He ruled in favor of Winston Frost when there was no
factual or legal basis to do so. Judge J. Anthony Miller acted as he did out of
overwhelming bias against me and clear prejudice for the extremely dishonest
Winston Frost, Michon Hughes, and Darrah Haworth. (Michon Hughes and
15
Darrah Haworth are attorneys for attorney Winston frost.) During the trial, I
stated that I took a medication that would not permit me to handle my defense
or testify. Not only did Judge J. Anthony Miller ignore this, but he had the
testimony and the identification of the medication, Trazadone, stricken from
the record. This can be proven as I have a tape recording. During trial, I
experienced a major panic attack. Judge J. Anthony Miller interfered with
my medical treatment in a demonstration of bias and abuse that almost defies
description. I could have hit my head and died when I passed out at the Tulsa
County Courthouse. On April 7, 2016, I was taken by ambulance from the
courthouse to the hospital at what felt like death’s door. And Judge J.
Anthony Miller had a bailiff hovering over me ordering me back into the
courtroom as I was lying on the courthouse floor being worked on by
emergency medical technicians.
54. On April 7, 2016, the Court entered the following Minutes:
“MILLER, J. ANTHONY: COURT INFORMED BY PETITIONER'S COUNSEL
THAT RESPONDENT IS ILL. COURT CONTINUES PRESENTMENT TO 04-
08-16 AT 1:15 PM. COURT DECLINES TO ISSUE BENCH WARRANT FOR
THE RESPONDENT. PETITIONER REPRESENTED BY MICHON HASTINGS
HUGHES, BOTH PRESENT. RESPONDENT PRO SE, NOT PRESENT. I was
in the hospital at what felt like death’s door.
55. On April 8, 2016, the Court issued a document titled “DECREE OF
DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE.” He ruled in favor of Winston Frost when
there was no factual or legal basis to do so. Judge J. Anthony Miller acted as
he did out of overwhelming bias against me and sick prejudice for the
extremely dishonest Winston Frost, Michon Hughes, and Darrah Haworth.

16
Judge J. Anthony Miller had no subject matter jurisdiction, so this decree is
void.
56. On April 8, 2016, the Court entered the following Minutes:
“MILLER, J. ANTHONY: CASE COMES ON FOR PRESENTMENT OF THE
DECREE BASED UPON COURT'S DECISION OF 04-06-16. AT 1:15 PM
RESPONDENT CONTACTED THE COURT'S CLERK AND ADVISED SHE
WOULD NOT BE APPEARING. DECREE OF DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE
SIGNED AND ENTERED. PETITIONER REPRESENTED BY MICHON
HASTINGS HUGHES, BOTH PRESENT. RESPONDENT PRO SE, NOT
PRESENT.”
57. On April 11, 2016, I sent a letter to Judge J. Anthony Miller asking
him to disqualify himself. It said “Please accept this letter as a formal request for
you to disqualify yourself in this case.” It was docketed in Case #FD-2014-1476
on April 18, 2016. This was an in camera request as it was made in private, and
she lives 1,500 miles away and could not go to Tulsa, Oklahoma. This was sent
after I returned from Oklahoma to New Hampshire following medical treatment.
Rule 15 does not define ‘in camera request.” Uslegal.com defines “In Camera” as
what happens when a judge reviews evidence to determine whether it should be
provided to other parties. West’s Encyclopedia of American Law defines it as “In
chambers; in private.” There is no Oklahoma appellate court decision that defines
an “in camera request.”
58. On April 11, 2016, I sent a Motion for a New Trial to be filed. It was
docketed on April 22, 2016.
59. On April 14, 2016, the Court entered the following Minutes:
“MILLER, J. ANTHONY: THE COURT IS IN RECEIPT OF RESPONDENT'S
LETTER REQUESTING RECUSAL OF JUDGE MILLER. THE COURT
17
DENIES RESPONDENT'S REQUEST FOR RECUSAL AND ORDERS
RESPONDENT'S LETTER FILED.”
60. On April 18, 2016, the Court entered the following on the Docket:
“LETTER TO JUDGE J ANTHONY MILLER FROM RESPONDENT.”
61. On April 22, 2016, the Court docketed my Motion for a New Trial
after the requested filing fee was received.
62. On April 30, 2016, I filed a Motion for a New Trial. It was docketed
on May 3, 2016 at 10:55 am.
63. On April 30, 2016, I sent a Motion to Disqualify Judge J. Anthony
Miller for filing. It was docketed on May 3, 2016 at 11:12 am. The April 11,
2016 in camera request to disqualify was confirmed on April 30, 2016 in the
Motion to Disqualify Judge J. Anthony Miller. Paragraph 4 of the Motion
stated: “An in camera request was first be made to the judge to disqualify or
to transfer the cause to another judge. This has been docketed.”
64. On April 30, 2016, I filed an Affidavit in which I swore to the
following under penalty of perjury: “Judge J. Anthony Miller possesses a personal
bias against me. Judge J. Anthony Miller must be disqualified. Judge J. Anthony
Miller harbors bias against me that materially affected my rights. Judge J.
Anthony Miller is biased against me as a pro se defendant. The extensive evidence
before Judge J. Anthony Miller of the almost unbelievable acts by Winston Frost
and his attorney prove that Judge J. Anthony Miller’s disregard of the sworn
evidence showed his prejudice for Winston Frost and his bias against me. Judge J.
Anthony Miller demonstrated his bias against me throughout the case. Judge J.
Anthony Miller screamed at me to ‘shut up’ at an informal conference when he
was not even a judge in the case. I did nothing to warrant such a brow-beating.
Judge J. Anthony Miller demonstrated his bias against me by denying my
18
Constitutionally-protected rights to due process. Judge J. Anthony Miller has
violated the Code of Judicial Conduct by treating me in a biased manner and
demeaning me in the courtroom. Judge J. Anthony Miller should be removed as a
judge and disbarred. There was little or nothing fair about this matter. My request
for ADA accommodations was ignored by Judge J. Anthony Miller, and no
accommodations were provided. My request for ADA accommodations was
ignored by the senior judge, and no accommodations were provided. I objected
that Judge J. Anthony Miller improperly made comments about the facts and
routinely misapplied the law. Judge J. Anthony Miller sustained objections of the
Petitioner that had no basis. Judge J. Anthony Miller allowed discovery abuse by
the Petitioner. Judge J. Anthony Miller allowed late discovery giving me no time
for review prior to trial. Judge J. Anthony Miller denied legitimate requests for
continuance. Judge J. Anthony Miller allowed Michon Hughes to prepare ‘my’
Trial Notebook for me, but the Pre-Trial Conference Order does not provide for an
adversary (Petitioner) to prepare the trial for the Respondent. Judge J. Anthony
Miller sustained objections of Winston Frost that had no basis. During trial, I
experienced a major panic attack. Judge J. Anthony Miller interfered with my
medical treatment in a demonstration of bias and abuse that almost defies
description. Judge J. Anthony Miller could have put my life at risk. During the
trial, I stated that I took a medication that would not permit me to handle my
defense or testify. Not only did Judge J. Anthony Miller ignore this, but he had the
testimony and the identification of the medication, Trazadone, stricken from the
record. This can be proven. Judge J. Anthony Miller denied my motions without
findings of fact or conclusions of law. Judge J. Anthony Miller then refused to
provide legal or factual justification for its orders when subsequently requested.
Judge J. Anthony Miller denied normal communications for me with the attorney
19
for the Petitioner with no factual or legal basis whatsoever. Judge J. Anthony
Miller denied my Motion to Strike the Petition for Dissolution of Marriage in total
violation of Oklahoma statutes. Judge J. Anthony Miller aided and abetted the
Petitioner’s attorney in committing notary fraud and fraud upon the court. Judge J.
Anthony Miller conspired with the Petitioner’s attorney to violate my rights. Judge
J. Anthony Miller allowed hundreds of counts of documented perjury by the
Petitioner and his attorneys. Judge J. Anthony Miller dismissed contempt charges
against the Petitioner’s attorneys with no justification whatsoever. Judge J.
Anthony Miller made it clear that he would take care of his fellow members of the
Bar. Judge J. Anthony Miller denied my witnesses and subpoenas for witnesses.
Judge J. Anthony Miller ignored essential pre-trial issues motioned by me until the
trial thus denying the relief I requested by virtue of the passage of time. Judge J.
Anthony Miller overruled my Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction on
completely bogus grounds. Judge J. Anthony Miller ruled that I had waived
personal jurisdiction when the motion related solely to subject matter jurisdiction.
Judge J. Anthony Miller then overruled my Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject
Matter Jurisdiction on completely bogus grounds. The Court ruled that Judicial
Estoppel applied, when it is not applicable. I should be given a new trial because I
was extremely ill and denied a continuance or medical or legal help. During trial, I
experienced a major panic attack. Judge J. Anthony Miller interfered with my
medical treatment in a demonstration of bias and abuse that almost defies
description. I could have hit my head and died when I passed out at the Tulsa
County Courthouse. If I had died, Judge J. Anthony Miller should have been
charged with murder or negligent homicide. Judge J. Anthony Miller denied my
request for a jury trial though there is no Oklahoma statute that conflicts with the
Oklahoma Constitution’s guarantee of the right to a jury trial. Judge J. Anthony
20
Miller did not do what he has done out of stupidity. It is obvious to me that Judge
J. Anthony Miller was biased against me from before he was ever assigned to the
case. I believe the result was predetermined. I object that Judge J. Anthony Miller
showed blatant prejudice. My Constitutional rights to due process were violated
repeatedly. My Constitutional rights to a fair trial and an impartial judge were
violated. I was denied the opportunity to present my major defenses. The Petition
for Dissolution of Marriage was unsigned. The Petition for Dissolution of
Marriage was fraudulently notarized. Judge J. Anthony Miller aided and abetted
Winston Frost’s attorney in committing notary fraud and fraud upon the court.
Judge J. Anthony Miller conspired with Winston Frost’s attorney to violate my
rights. Judge J. Anthony Miller allowed hundreds of counts of documented perjury
by Winston Frost and his attorneys. Judge J. Anthony Miller dismissed contempt
charges against Winston Frost’s attorneys with no justification whatsoever. Judge
J. Anthony Miller indicated that he would take care of his fellow members of the
Bar. Judge J. Anthony Miller denied my witnesses and subpoenas for witnesses.
Judge J. Anthony Miller ignored essential pre-trial issues motions filed by me until
the trial thus denying me the relief requested by virtue of the passage of time.
Judge J. Anthony Miller lacked subject matter jurisdiction to grant a divorce in this
matter. The right to be tried by an impartial judge is deeply embedded in
American jurisprudence; in fact, this right has often been considered to be the
“cornerstone” of the American legal system. But this is largely a myth. I did not
receive fair, unbiased treatment and did not receive a fair trial in this case with
Judge J. Anthony Miller.”
65. On May 5, 2016 at 4:35 pm, an order was entered overruling the April
30, 2016 Motion to Disqualify Judge J. Anthony Miller. The order stated that I
failed to comply with Rule 15 by first requesting an in camera hearing.
21
 66. On May 5, 2016 at 4:35 pm, an order was entered in Case #FD-2014-
1476 overruling the Motion for a New Trial.
67. On May 10, 2016, I responded to Judge J. Anthony Miller’s order
stating that I failed to request an in camera hearing. I showed that Judge J.
Anthony Miller’s clerk, Shana Grandstaff, and I exchanged several emails. Shana
Grandstaff claimed Rule 15 requires an in person hearing, but it does not. Shana
Grandstaff said that she consulted with Judge J. Anthony Miller, and he said the in
camera request needs to be in person.
68. On May 11, 2016, I filed a Motion for Reconsideration of the Order
Denying the Motion for a New Trial in Case #FD-2014-1476. It was docketed on
May 13, 2016.
69. On May 31, 2016, I filed a motion for an in camera hearing on the
disqualification of Judge J. Anthony Miller. It was docketed in Case #FD-2014-
1476 on June 3, 2016.
70. On June 21, 2016, I received an email from Judge J. Anthony Miller’s
clerk, Shana Grandstaff, setting a telephonic hearing on the motion for an in
camera hearing on the disqualification of Judge J. Anthony Miller for June 23,
2016 in Case #FD-2014-1476. [Exhibit 2.] This has not been docketed.
71. On June 23, 2016, the hearing was held. A court reporter transcribed
the hearing. I testified under oath.
72. On June 27, 2016, an order was entered overruling the in camera
request for disqualification. This order was received on Friday, July 1, 2016 at
approximately 3:30 pm while I was at work.
73. On July 5, 2015, as soon as the Fourth of July holiday was over, I sent
a Motion for Reconsideration of the Order overruling the in camera request for
disqualification.
22
 74. On July 5, 2015, I filed a “Motion to Disqualify Judge J. Anthony
Miller.” This is filed in Case #FD-2014-1476 to comply with Rule 15. There
has been no action by Judge J. Anthony Miller.
75. Everything that was done by Judge J. Anthony Miller was for the
benefit of his fellow attorney peers and his former law school classmate who
happens to be Winston L. Frost.

Judge J. Anthony Miller did all this when he should have disqualified himself
from the very beginning when he had knowledge of the disputed facts before
he was assigned this case.

I have a tape recording of the April 5-7th matters before Judge J. Anthony
Miller which will provide undeniable evidence of his wrongdoing.

23