Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
CA
252 SCRA 620
FACTS:
The province of Tarlac maintains an account with PNB-Tarlac. Part of its
funds is appropriated for the benefit of Concepcion Emergency Hospital. During a post-audit done by the
province, it was found out that 30 of its checks weren’t received by the hospital. Upon further investigation, it was
found out that the checks were encashed by Pangilinan who was a former
cashier and administrative officer of the hospital through forged
indorsements. This prompted the provincial treasurer to ask for
reimbursement from PNB and thereafter, PNB from Associated Bank. As the two banks didn't want to
reimburse, an action was filed against them.
HELD:
There is a distinction on forged indorsements with regard bearer instruments and instruments payable to
order.
With instruments payable to bearer, the signature of the payee or holder is unnecessary to pass title to the
instrument. Hence, when the indorsement
is a forgery, only the person whose signature is forged can raise the defense of forgery against holder in due
course.
With regard the issue of delay, a delay in informing the bank of the forgery, which deprives it of the
opportunity to go after the forger, signifies
negligence on the part of the drawee bank and will preclude it from claiming reimbursement. In this case,
PNB wasn't guilty of any negligent delay. Its delay hasn't prejudiced Associated Bank in any way because
even if there wasn't delay, the fact that there was nothing left of the account of Pangilinan, there couldn't be
anymore reimbursement.