Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Emma Yokules
Introduction
Reading is a basic skill that most people develop by the time they are about seven years
old. It is one of the most basic skills for a person to attain, especially since we might not be able
to survive without it. What happens if someone cannot read, or struggles to read? In the world of
education there are a variety of methods teachers can use to assist students to improve their
reading skills. Since being able to read is a basic skill for life, it is imperative that everyone is
able to do it, and do it well. Over the years many people have developed different ways to
properly instruct and develop students in reading. One of the methods teachers use is the Think
Aloud Method. Teachers use this method to vocally describe the story, so the students can better
understand it. The main focus of this method is to improve reading comprehension in students,
and to model what a good reader does. It begins by looking at different research conducted by
professionals in the field. It goes on to conduct a study to determine the overall effectiveness of
Purpose
Teachers are constantly searching for new methods to improve their students reading
skills, specifically in comprehension. A method more and more teachers are utilizing is the think
aloud method. As the teacher reads a story to the class, they will take pauses and vocalize their
thoughts about the story, hoping to provoke student’s interest and questions. Through research I
plan to answer the question: what are the benefits of using the think aloud method as opposed to
The Think Aloud Method and Reading Comprehension 3
traditional reading instruction methods? Specifically, what improvements did teachers who use
In order to conduct research I plan to survey several teachers who are currently or have
used the Think Aloud Method in the past. The teachers surveyed will all teach different grade
levels and subject areas. Additionally, I hope to survey a few teachers who do not use this
method and see if they have an effective method, or if they have not heard or tried the think
aloud method and think it could be effective for their students. Another question to ask teachers
who use this method is whether or not they saw this method being a positive tool for students
After researching, hopefully the research will display how that the think aloud method is
beneficial and effective to use in the classroom. Another prediction is that this method will be a
tool teachers can use with students with a learning disability. The main goal however, is to see
that using the think aloud method, as opposed to other reading instruction methods, that students
comprehension improves.
Review of Literature
When teachers use the think aloud method it can be very helpful to the success of their
students. In a research study conducted by Brenna McClintock, Diane Pesco, and Sandra Martin-
Chang (2013) they looked into the effects of reading comprehension for both typically
developing students and students with a speech language impairment. The study tested two
groups of students, one of typically developing students and the other was of students with a
speech language impairment. This research was administered in two parts, for both parts students
were given a text to read. For the first reading students read to themselves without any
The Think Aloud Method and Reading Comprehension 4
interruptions. However, for the second test, students were asked to think aloud while they were
reading. After both parts students were given a set of comprehension questions. The results
showed that comprehension improved in the think aloud section. Although, the students with the
speech language impairment’s scores were lower than the typically developing students in both
parts, they still showed an improvement in the think aloud section. Essentially, the think aloud
The article provided valuable information on the use of the think aloud method for
students with a learning disability, in particular a speech language impairment. The researchers
conducted a well thought experiment that was very effective. They had prior knowledge and
experience to conduct valuable research. However, one flaw of the article was the writing style.
They mentioned a lot of numbers in their findings, but do not always explain them, except in the
figures. It would have been beneficial to describe the numbers as they are listed. However, the
article did provide how the Think Aloud Method is Valuable. Plus, it provided a few practical
implications for the classroom. For further research, a study testing students with different
disabilities like autism, in order to see if this method would be the most valuable.
After further research of the think aloud procedure a new question has to be asked. How
does the think aloud method affect higher order thinking skills and reading comprehension?
Ghaith and Obeia (2004) further examined this question. They conducted a study to determine if
training students in the think aloud method would increase their ability to comprehend a text.
Additionally, they were looking to see if the think aloud method was more effective than regular
instruction. Thirty-two 8th grade students who were designated as English as a Foreign Language
were chosen for this experiment. The students were randomly split into two groups, control
group and experiment group and included four phases. First, the teachers were trained in the
The Think Aloud Method and Reading Comprehension 5
application of the think aloud procedure. Over the course of four weeks the think aloud
procedure was implemented. The experimental group had a lot more practice in applying the
think aloud method than the control group. After these four weeks a post test was administered to
the students. Finally, interviews were conducted to determine student’s mastery of the think
aloud method. The conclusion of this experiment showed that mastering the think aloud method
This article presented new information and insights about the different ways the think
aloud method was used. It was interesting to read that the Think Aloud Method is a useful tool
for reading comprehension. The format of the article was clear and the research was easy to
understand. The article did not use overly-technical terms, which means anyone should be able to
read it. One negative part of the article was that it was difficult to determine the difference in
testing the experiment and control group. If the authors would have gone into more detail on this
and the different controls they used, it would have been more helpful in analyzing the research.
However, the authors did discuss using the think aloud method to improve higher level thinking
skills, which is valuable for current research on the topic. As for further research, it would be
interesting to study the effect of training teachers and students to use this method in other areas
of learning.
When teachers instruct their students on reading comprehension, they hope their students
will be able to make meaningful statements related to the text. Gillam, Fargo, and Robertson
(2009) further examined this thought. They wanted to examine students with and without
language impairments and see if they were able to sufficiently comprehend expository texts in
order to provide quality statements about the text. They tested 40 fourth grade students, some
with and some without a language impairment. The students were tested by being asked to
The Think Aloud Method and Reading Comprehension 6
individually “think aloud.” Students were asked to read a passage sentence by sentence and
comment as intelligently as they could about what they had just read. The results of this study
showed two interesting facts. First, the think aloud method can be useful to both students with
and without a hearing impairment. Also, when students used the think aloud method, their
responses were more like paraphrases rather than repetition of the text. This showed that the
In continuing the topic of comprehension and the think aloud method, the authors showed
how these strategies relate. It also involved testing students with language impairments. This was
a great part of the article, as it is always good to find new ways to instruct students with language
impairments. However, one drawback of the article was that the research was not presented in
everyday easy to read language. It took several readings to fully comprehend the results of the
research. Sometimes teachers do not have time to sift through research, they just want to get the
meat of it. Hence, making the structure more teacher friendly would be beneficial. For further
research, it would be interesting to study ELL students and see if the think aloud method helps
As students get older the type of texts they have to read become more and more
challenging. Especially, as they move from narrative texts which are fairly simply to
comprehend to an expository text. Since students have a more difficult time comprehending texts
like these, Schellings, Aarnouste, and van Leeuwe (2006) decided to examine if using the think
aloud method would be a valuable method in improving reading comprehension. They tested 24
third grade students from six different schools; there were two good students with good
comprehension and two students with bad comprehension per school. In order to test their
hypothesis the researchers had two different measurements. First, they gave students a variety of
The Think Aloud Method and Reading Comprehension 7
tests, measuring fluency, comprehension, vocabulary, and a few other skills. Then, for the
second part the researchers administered two different expository texts. There were blank lines in
the texts meant to remind students to think aloud, and very little verbal prompting for students to
verbally think aloud was done. After these two measurements the researchers found that the
think aloud is valuable for reading in young students. The think aloud method is important in
The final article examined a younger age group of students in terms of reading more difficult
texts, like expository texts. It was good that it examined a younger age group of students. One
negative part of this article was that it was extremely detailed. Now, detail is good, but again for
a teacher that needs a quick read it may not be beneficial. The purpose and method of the article
are excellent and provide great insights into the think aloud method, however it would be better
to see this if it was less detailed and more broken up. For instance, having more headings,
subheadings, and even graphics. The results of the article were pertinent to the research question
because they showed that the think aloud method is beneficial to reading comprehension. As an
extension to this research they could try increasing the difficulty and having students think aloud
after a paragraph, or even a chapter of a book, to determine if using the think aloud method still
helps students.
Methodology
After completing research on the Think Aloud Method, a research question needed to be
asked. This question was, what are the benefits to using the think aloud method as opposed to
other reading instruction methods? In order to answer this question, a survey was created. The
survey included six questions, 1 question about the grade level and subject each teacher taught, 2
The Think Aloud Method and Reading Comprehension 8
yes or no response questions, and the rest short answer questions. Due to the circumstances, the
researcher chose a convenience sampling for the participants. Choosing the teachers most
accessible to the researcher to distribute the survey to was the way to perform research on the
Think Aloud Method for this particular study. The participants of the survey were a group of
eleven teachers. Ten of the teachers taught in a middle school, therefore they taught grades 6-8.
The subjects they taught ranged from Social Studies, Science, and English Language Arts, and
Art. The eleventh participant was a kindergarten teacher, who taught all subjects.
Then, the surveys were administered to the teachers. Ten of the teachers received a copy
of the survey electronically. The format the survey was administered was on Google Forms. By
using the online format it was convenient for the teachers to complete the survey. Additionally,
Google Forms compiled all the responses into one document. Besides the Google Forms survey,
it was also administered as a traditional paper copy to the eleventh teacher. The paper copy was
the most convenient form for this teacher to complete the survey. Therefore, this was the method
chosen for this particular teacher to complete the survey. Once the surveys were distributed,
teachers had one week to complete the survey. Time was given so teachers could thoughtfully
Only a few of the teachers who were selected for this survey had used the think aloud
method prior to taking the survey. Therefore, a brief summary of the research behind this survey
and a description of the Think Aloud Method was included with every survey. This introduction
was meant to give the teachers, even the ones utilizing the method, a background to the research,
so they would be able to identify the purpose of the surveys they were given.
The Think Aloud Method and Reading Comprehension 9
Findings
The findings presented are the answers the participants gave to the survey questions about
the Think Aloud Method. Each participant completed a survey with six questions on it. The first
question asked teachers what grade and subject level they teach. Although, there was prior
knowledge about the grade level each teacher taught, the subject level was unknown prior to the
survey. This was important to know since not all teachers taught English. Subject areas included
English, History, Art, Science, and the kindergarten teacher taught all subjects. The next two
questions were yes/no questions. First, have you heard of the Think Aloud Method before? Then,
have you used the think aloud method in your classroom. The results for each of these questions
were in correspondence. Five of the eleven participants answered no to the first two questions,
and the remaining 6 answered yes to the first two questions. For the remainder of the survey was
For the first short answer question teachers were asked if, when they use the think aloud
method they have seen an improvement in their students reading comprehension. The
overwhelming response was teachers have seen the ways the Think Aloud method improves their
student’s reading comprehension. Vocabulary was one area teachers have seen improvement in.
Specifically, one teacher mentioned, “the students talk about what is being read and then they
clarify challenging vocabulary.” Discovering this result, enhanced the initial research done for
the topic. In a study conducted by Ebner and Ehri (2013), they tested a group of college students
to determine if the Think Aloud method improves the student’s understanding of vocabulary in a
text. They found that when using the Think Aloud method, the participants showed a greater
comprehension and recognition of vocabulary. Also, another teacher mentioned the Think Aloud
The Think Aloud Method and Reading Comprehension 10
method improves builds reading comprehension and uses higher order thinking skills. These
skills and abilities are important for students to have in terms of reading abilities.
However, the main response to the first short answer response was that the Think Aloud
method was a benefit for struggling readers. For instance, one teacher mentioned that, “the Think
Aloud Method can help struggling readers comprehend a text as opposed to having them read it
on their own.” The teacher mentioned pausing at different times while reading the text, and
discussing main concepts and vocabulary words helps to clarify difficulties for these struggling
readers. Additionally this teacher mentioned that at times they allow students to read the text out
loud, to model the behavior of reading for others. Good reading strategies in the Think Aloud
Method are primarily modeled by the teacher. However, the response this teacher gave is another
way to practice the Think Aloud Method. This correlated to another response which was, “it
models behaviors for good readers, and students begin to actively participate in reading.” The
modeling behavior relates to a piece of research done by Gillam, Fargo, and Robertson (2009).
These researchers found that student’s responses to a text are more thoughtful when they think
aloud, than if they read it by themselves. Seeing that another teacher found that the skills a good
reader should have are enhanced through the Think Aloud method was interesting to discover.
Other teachers mentioned that they use this method to check students reading progress and to
An additional question asked in the survey was, would you use the Think Aloud method in
your classroom if you do not already? The overwhelming answer to this question, among the five
teachers who indicated they have neither heard of nor used this method before, was yes. One
teacher even mentioned that if they were taught how to use it they would. This point was one for
reflection. In researching, one of the articles, by Ghaith and Obeia (2004), actually trained the
The Think Aloud Method and Reading Comprehension 11
teachers in using the method before they used it with their students. The study did show that
reading comprehension was improved. Instructing more teachers in this method can be beneficial
to reading instruction. Therefore, teachers were very open to utilizing this method, and
Finally, the last short answer question asked teachers to describe any other reading
instruction methods they have used. It was meant to attempt to discover if the Think Aloud
method was the best way to improve reading comprehension, or if teachers knew of other
methods they have found that work better. Additionally, it would be beneficial to become aware
of more than method of reading instruction, especially since every student learns differently.
Several of the methods the teachers explained they use are, four corners, partner reading, think-
pair-share, reciprocal reading, annotating text, and 3-level guides. The teachers explained how
these methods are beneficial, and some even described the ways they integrate some of them into
the Think Aloud method. One other interesting resource a teacher mentioned, was Newsela,
which is a website that offers different reading levels of the same content. All of these
suggestions are able to be integrated into the Think Aloud method in order to enhance students
reading comprehension.
Recommendations
While the research conducted in this study presented valuable findings and conclusions,
there still is the need for improvements. However, first, examine the conclusions to be drawn
from the current study. After completing research, an answer was discovered to the question,
what are the benefits of using the think aloud method as opposed to traditional reading
The Think Aloud Method and Reading Comprehension 12
instruction methods? The answer being that the Think Aloud method is an important reading
instruction method. It improves a student’s reading comprehension, helps with vocabulary, and is
an excellent tool for struggling readers. Nevertheless, there are still other reading instruction
methods out there. Some of them work well, while others do not. Each group of students a
teacher has will be different, so teachers should remain open to any method to improve their
reading instruction. Still, after examining research from this study, the Think Aloud does show
As for an improvement to this study, the first step would be to actually test a group of
students. The data received from the teachers, although beneficial, was not as specific as it would
have been from the students themselves. By testing the students individually, the specific areas
students benefit by using the Think Aloud method can be clearly observed. Also, the test could
be done to students with a learning disability, in order to see the improvement they may have
while using the Think Aloud method. It is true that the teachers did provide responses to aid the
study, it would have been an excellent addition to see the results of the students. The only reason
teachers were tested for this survey was due to convenience. The original idea for test subjects
Nonetheless, if, due to accessibility, teachers are the only participants available, there are
improvements to be done in that regard also. First, more teachers need to be surveyed. Only
eleven teachers were able to be surveyed in this study. Although they were able to provide useful
data to the research, a larger sampling would have provided a vaster amount of data. Since there
would be variance in a larger sampling the results could be more conclusive, since they represent
a larger number of teachers. Also, the selection of the teacher should be more intentional. Each
teacher who completed the survey was random. Seeing the diverse amount of subjects was an
The Think Aloud Method and Reading Comprehension 13
unforeseen, yet useful aspect of the survey. Surveying teachers who are directly teaching
students how to read, would have been a more specific group to test. One final improvement for
the teacher survey would be to improve the survey questions. The questions should have been
more specific, especially since some teachers did not go into too much detail.
As for an area future researchers can discover is, comparing the Think Aloud Method
with other reading instruction methods. The goal would be to determine which method would be
the best for students to use. Researchers can test each method on the same group of students.
This test would be more detailed than the research conducted here. However, it would be
advantageous to this field of study. Teachers are always trying to find what works best for their
students, thus conducting this test teachers would be able to determine a method teachers can use
to best instruct students in reading. Many teachers already do this in their classrooms every year,
so an actually research study would benefit many teachers. If nothing else, it would outline each
method and the pros and cons of each method. This study would be especially helpful for
beginning teachers, who have not yet had too much experience with students.
Since there are a variety of reading instruction methods out there, it is difficult for
teachers to keep up with them all. One of the teachers in the survey mentioned that if they were
given more information about the Think Aloud method, then they would be interested in using it.
Teachers need to be given instruction and resources in these methods in order to use them.
Additionally if they were able to see more research surrounding this topic, so they know this
method works for students it would be a great help for teachers. Teachers always want to find
new methods to help their students, and this method would be very beneficial to teachers in any
subject area.
The Think Aloud Method and Reading Comprehension 14
Finally, a subject for future researches to test related to this topic is to see if English
Language Learners show improvement by using this method. The studies researched prior to
completing research looked at mainly struggling readers using this method. Plus, the teachers
surveyed did not have experience with English Language Learners, just struggling readers.
Therefore, testing this group of students may provide a method for assisting English Language
Learners. Any new method to help teachers work with English Language Learners always seems
to be needed.
Overall, the study conducted in the paper was able to provide valuable ways the Think
Aloud Method benefits students. The Think Aloud Method does improve students reading
comprehension, along with other necessary reading skills. The study was conclusive and was
able to answer the research question adequately. However, more research can always be done.
As the overall goal of research is to improve the knowledge on a topic. The Think Aloud Method
is a valuable tool for education, and, therefore should be examined in more detail. However, the
information gained from this study provide an excellent foundation for further studies.
The Think Aloud Method and Reading Comprehension 15
References
Ebner, R., & Ehri, L. (2013). Vocabulary learning on the internet: Using a structured think aloud
Fisher, D., Frey, N., Lapp, D., (2011). Coaching middle-level teachers to think aloud improves
comprehension instruction and student reading achievement. The Teacher Educator, 46,
231-243.
Ghaith, G., Obeia, H. (2004). Effect of think alouds on literal and higher-order reading
Gillam, S., Fargo, J., Robertson, K. Comprehension of expository text: Insights gained from
McClintock, B., Pesco, D., Martin-Chang, S. (2013). Thinking aloud: Effects on text
Schellings, G., Aarnouste, C., van Leeuwe, J. 2006. Third-graders think aloud protocols: Types
Appendix A
What are the benefits of using the Think Aloud Method as opposed to other instructional
methods? The Think Aloud Method is when the teacher reads a story to the class they pause to
vocalize their thoughts, ask students questions, and clarify vocabulary words. It is meant to
increase a student's comprehension of a text. The survey is being conducted to see if this method
is effective in the classroom, according to the teachers.
Thank you for taking the time to complete my survey!
Yes No
Have you used the Think Aloud Method in your classroom before?
Yes No
If you use the Think Aloud Method, have you noticed it improves student's reading
comprehension? Please explain how you use this method in your classroom.
Are there any other methods you have used that help student's reading comprehension? Please
explain.
Would you use the Think Aloud Method in your classroom if you do not already?