FERENC GYULAI
ENVIRONMENT AND AGRICULTURE
IN BRONZE AGE HUNGARY
@
BUDAPEST 1993ARCHAEOLINGUA
Edited by
SANDOR BOKONYI and WOLFGANG MEID
Series Minor
4bee ARCHAEOLINGUA.
ication Series jointly edited by the
tute of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
and the Linguistic Institute of the University of Innsbruck
Editors:
SANDOR BOKONYI and WOLFGANG MEID
Assistant Editor:
ERZSEBET JEREM
‘The Cover Photograph shows the Tell-Settlement
from Tészeg — Laposhalom, excavated by I. Béna and I, Stanczik
ISBN 963 7391 665
HU-ISSN 1216-6847
1993
ARCHAEOLINGUA ALAPITVANY
Archaeological Institute of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences
H-1250 Budapest, Uri utca 49
English Translation by Laszl6 Bantosiewicz
Revised by Lyn Sellwood
Word Processing by Andrés Kardos
Desktop Editing by Ildik6 Perjés
Tilustrations and Lay-out: Eresébet Jerem
Printed by AKAPRINT, Budapest
Contents
Foreword
1. Introduction
2. Material and Method
Studies in climatic ecology
3.1 The Bronze Age and the preceding Atlantic Phase
3.2 Transition between the Atlantic and Subboreal Phases
3.3 The Subboreal Phase
4. Plant cultivation culture
4.1 Plant cultivation during the Early Bronze Age
4.2 Plant cultivation during the Middle Bronze Age
4.3 Plant cultivation during the Late Bronze Age
4.4 The evolution of weed associations
4.5 Bronze Age viniculture and fruit consumption
4.6 The agriculture of Bronze Age people
4.7 Grain processing and storage
Examinations in nutritional history
5.1 The basis of food analysis
‘5.2 Food remains in Hungary
Summary
References2. Material and Method
According to Willerding (1970), archaeobot
sified into the groups of either rect finds include
‘Some organs or parts of organs from ancient plants, which may have under-
gone chemical (e.g. buming) or biochemical (e.g. peat formation) processes,
but which under retain their external
jlogical-microcher
‘and cytological-physical (e.g, studies of fibres in polarized
Most of the archaeobotanical finds may be considered direct. Many of
them were deposited as the result of both cons
(hoarding, setilement refuse, detritus
Additional parts of plants may be depo:
a result ofnatural processes (wind, water, rotovinae). Among such deposited
Plant remains, seeds and ft tively esistant. They may be preserved
due to a number of edaphic, rs. Their conservation
‘ay be caused by the peat formation process or, more rarely, by the presence
‘ofheavy metal ions, They may also be incorporated in plaster work andhouses
or preserved in extremely dry environments (e.g burial chambers). Most of
them, however, occur in a carbonized form (Sagi and Fuzes 1960).
Differences in preservation may thus be caused by structural differences
tween the plants’ material, edaphic and climatic factors as well as human
activity. The age ofthe find influences preservation as well. Consequently,
the preparation and analysis of such materials may be carried out in anumber
of ways using a variety of methods. Archacobotanical materials from
Hungary were preserved by fire in most cases. Less commonly, these finds
were preserved by an accumulation of humic acids during the humification
(that is peat formation) process.
Plant remains from archaeological times most typically survive in a
carbonized state. They may result from a natural carbonization process of
Panial burning by fire. Although Hungarian vemacular language uses the
ms (Magyar Enelmez6 Sz6tér 1962), Ségi and
Ww, natural carbonization resulting from the joint
-mperature and time (szenesedés; Inkohlung in German)
and rapid carbonization caused by fire (szenlés, e.g. charring: Verkohlung
in German). Botanical finds from various archaeological periods usvally fall
within the latter category (Novaki 1983).
arts mixed
(The pans
yemselves may well be present in the direct palaeobotanical
‘material as well). As far asthe original parts are concemed, they may have
fallen out of, or bumt inside the structures. Sometimes they were dissolved
or consumed by micro- and macro-organisms, They may occur in the form of
ional, oF negatives
). Caleified
when the place of encapsulated plant materials is taken by
precipitated calcium salts carried and deposited by the soil’s water content.
icro remains (pollen, spores) often survive stuck to the macrobotanical
remains (Greguss 1937). Palynology is a special branch of botany developed
for the identification of these materials (Bertsch 1942; Zolyomi 1953; Straka
1975).
Depending on their type and preservation, the plant remains recovered
from excavations may be analyzed by means of cytological, histological and
morphological procedures. Fibrous plant materials may be evaluated by
means of cytomorphological, microchemical (staining and dilluting) and
physical methods (observations made in polarized light). The description of
these techniques is extensively published (Hollendonner 1923; Greguss 1937;
Zilahi, Herezeg and Kéczy 1951 1953; Ramaseder 1960; Fzes 1977).
‘The series of histol ns was started by Unger in 1851,
who identified the botanical remains brought to light from the Hallstatt salt
mine near Salzburg. In Hungary, such studies were first pursued in 1892 by
Deininger, director of the Keszthely Agricultural Study Institute, His work
was continued by Hollendonner (1933), Greguss (op. cit), Sérkény (1939),
Szalay (1941), Stieber (1952), Fzes (1956), Valk6 (1970) and Gyulai (1991),
During the analysis of seed and fruit remains morphological ident
is of prime importance and enjoys a priority over any of the previously
mentioned methods, regardless of the preservation of finds. Experience
showed that although handbooks (Beijerinck 1947; Schermann 1966) and
anticles may be used during the identification procedure, the results must
always be cross-checked using modem referenct'specimer
times even necessary to use computer models, Morphol
‘change as a function of bot
uation process
fied species were compared to reference specimens
ical and modem collections and herbaria of the
Balaton Museum at Keszthely, the Hungarian Agricultural Museum in2
Budapest and the Botanical Institute of the University of Basel in Switzerland
. $06 herb.). The scientific nomenclature of plants follows the
lists (Mansfeld 1986) uniformly accepted by archaco-
botanists, while Hungarian ts were adopted from So6 and Kérpéti
(1968) and Priszter (1986). The English translation of these names is based
‘on works by Priszter (1983) as well as Williams and Hunyady (1987).
‘The development of new chemical methods during the last few decades
tated the application of certain analytic, laboratory, techniques to
anical research. Gas chromatography and absorption
spectrochromatography are of instrumental help in mapping the macro- and
micto-element structures of seed and fruit finds. These methods, as well as
amino-acid analyses, provide valuable i
obtained any other way on the nutritional value of ancient grains. As will be
demonstrated here, this information is not even biased by differences in the
level of carbonization.
3. Studies in climatic ecology
3.1 The Bronze Age and the preceding Atlantic Phase
‘The Holocene, also known as Flander interglacial, started in 8200 BC.
Around 3000 BC a new phase of this period started which lasted until 800,
BC. This entire time interval is called the Subboreal Phase which,
archacologically speaking, includes the Late Neolithic and the entire Bronze
Age.
‘The stratigraphic analysis of bore samples used in palynological research
poses a number of difficulties. Layers may in some cases merge, while in
Other cases they may be missing. Pollen analyses of the sediment gathered in
Lake Balaton showed that the maximum extent of forest
‘occured during this phase in the Carpathian Basin (
of deforestation followed from around 3000 BC which corresponds to the
Copper Age (2400-1900 BC) in Hungarian archacology (Jérai-Koml6di,
Kordos and Tardy 1982). New human populations moving into the Carpathi
Basin satisfied their need for arable land by large scale forest clearing. The
Neolithic way of life could thus be maintained. The samples available for
analysis contained increasing proportions of grains and seeds from weeds of
cultivation (Zélyomi 1980). The new immigrant populations maintained plant
cultivation and animal husbrandy as their chief occupations, although this
latter gained in importance, probably as a consequence of climatic
changes (see T:
‘The beginning of the Hungarian Neolithic coincides with the beginning
of the Atlantic Phase (5500-2800 BC; Ferenczy 1958). This time period, also
called the Atlantic Oak Phase in Hungary, was characterized by a warm,
humid but temperate, near Sub-mediterranean climate. Consequently, the
Carpathian Basin could serve as a link between the knowledge of plant
cultivation in the “Fertile Crescent” ofthe Middle East and the rest of Central
Europe.
On the basis of palynological research carried out on the Great Hungarian
possible to reconstruct the flora and ic conditions of the
Alantic Phase (Jérai-Koml6di 1966; Szujk6-Lacza 1991). This informat
ate. A brief outline of the Atlantic vegetation is summarized in the
work of Julia Szujk6-Lacza (1991).
‘The topography of the area between the Danube and Tisza rivers became
varied due to changes Danube’s course. The altitude of this area4
sometimes reaches 200 m above the Adriatic sea level. On the other hand, the
elevation on the eastem, left bank of the Tisza river does not even reach
100m. The Tisza had a definite impact on the formation of th
It created more even surfaces which are covered by loess, while some parts
are characterized by acidic riverine deposits. Both areas were open in a
floristic sense to the north (Hungarian Hill region), west (Transdanubia) and
south (westem and eastem Illyrian and south
situation of this area encouraged the immigr tude of related
plant species. On the other hand, due to the specific character of the region,
it developed many individual features as well.
‘The Atlantic Phase seems to have been the riche
within the
‘every sample taken in sand dunes. It is for this reason that juniper
associations (Junipero-Populetum) can be regarded as characte
sandy areas of the Great Hungarian Plain. Common pine (Pinus sylvestris)
retreated to enclares characterized exclusively as Myrtillo-Pinetum. The
Ericaceae family is only represented by heather a sp.), although the
expansion of woodland did not favour these photophilous species.
Associations characterized by ash and elm (Fraxino pannonicae-Ul-
metum) were dominated by Hungarian narrow-leaved ash (Fraxinus angus-
subsp. pannonica) of Balkanic origin. Common maple (Acer
campestre) was frequent in this association while in some areas great maple
(Acer pseudoplatanus) also occurred. Since then these species have become
trees,
\ew species appeared. Hungarian hawthom (Crataegus
nigra) and wayfaring tree (Viburnum lantana) were of Balkanic origin. Plants
fon the grass level included ramsons (Allium ursinum), wood anemone
(Anemona nemorosa), European ginger (Asarum europacum), lily of the
valley (Convallaria majalis), the common ivy (Hedera helix) of Atlantic
immer snowflake (Leucojum aestivum), broad-leaved Solomon's
i),
(Scilla vindobonensis), figwort (Scrophularia umbrosa). The
‘occurrences of false brome (Brachypodium sylvaticum), yellow dead-nettle
(Lamium syn, Lamiastrum galeobdolon) and herb-Paris (Paris quadrifolia),
which probably first appeared at the beginning of the Flanders intergl:
are still limited. It has not yet been decided, to what extent the Hungarian
ash-alder associ Pannonicae-Alnetum) was separated from the
peat furn-alder association (Thelypteridi-Alnetum),
1s
It may be assumed that in addition to common maple (Acer campestris)
‘ombeam (Carpinus betulus) also played
Other characteristic species ofthe shrub
luded ‘Tatarlan maple (Acer tataricum) and dog-berry (Comus
cerned during the Atlantic Phase, the Great
lar to the Balkans, the Crimean Peninsula
of today. Parallels in modern Hungary include Transdanubia and the Northern
Mountains, At the same time, there was a difference between the species
composition of oak forests in the northem and the southern regions of the
Great Hungarian Plain.
‘Common oak-hombeam associations (Querco robori-Carpinetum) char-
the
+. Studying the modern occurrence of this common
it may be seen that it contains species which are
also present in durmas oak-horbeam (Quercus petreae-Carpinetum), sub-
montane beach (Melitti-Fagetum sylvaticae) as well as durmas oak-Austrian
‘oak (Querceto petreae-cerris) associations which have existed continuously
in the Northern Mountains and Transdanubia since those times. These species
in common include spindle tree (Euonymus europaeus). common privet
(Ligustrum vulgare), velvet lungwort (Pulmonaria molissima), lesser celan-
dine (Ranunculus ficaria) and Wood Sanicle (Sanicula europea).
Climatic-zonal relict forest types of the present day area between the
Danube and Tisza rivers include oak and lily of the valley associations
(Convallario-Quercetum) in sandy areas as well as common oak-hormbeam
associations (Querco robori-Carpinetum). ‘These are indicative of a high
correlation between geographical altitude and the niveau of the water table
(Papp and Szodfridt 1967). It may be assumed that the same relationship
influenced the distributions of the previously mentioned plant associations
«during the Atlantic Phase, although the expansion of such forests in the Great
Hungarian Plain wes more limited than during the Subboreal Phase.
During the Atlantic Phase the common oak-hombeam association
(Querco robori-Carpinetum) served as a refuge for Preboreal relict species
oak-hombeam associ
(present day
Yugoslavia) have already indicated that during the Atlantic Phase the sandy16
plain provided an ideal environment for the migration of species to both the
southwest and the north, When the results of his study are adopted within the
context of sandy plains located in the southern section of the Great Hungarian
Plain, it becomes possible to reconstruct forests with varying abundances of
species. Among the groups of silver lime (Tilia argentea syn. tomentosa) and
common oak (Quercus robur) wig tree (Cotinus coggygria) also occured.
‘Common juniper Guniperus communis) also formed thickets. The rich flora
of forest clearings included broad-leaved wormwood (Artemisia latifolia),
iris species (is. variegata), field scabious (Knautia arvensis) and
tassel-hyacinth (Muscari comosum). Open sandy grassland associations
(Festucatum vaginatae danubium) dominated in extensive areas.
3.2 Transition between the Atlantic and Subboreal Phases
‘Atthe end of the AUantic Phase and around the beginning of the Subboreal
Phase, that is at the end of the Neolithic Period preceding the Bronze Age
(approximately 2800 BC) the warm, humid and balanced climate, previously
free of extremes, gradually deteriorated.
Extensive Neolithic mixed oak forests (oak, elm, lime and ash trees with
hazelnut growing on the shrub level, often referred to as EMW standing for
Eichenmischwald in the German language literature) occupied loess soils
which provided an ideal basis for agricultural cultivation. The species
jon of these forests started changing.
llen analyses, the mass invasion of beech
humid (Jacomet, Brombacher and Dick 1989). Parallel to this phenomenon,
the contribution of oak gradually declined, although its percentual proportion
remained significant. Birch, elm and hombeam were also important as well
‘a spruce and fir on higher altitudes. The pollen of walnut (Juglans regia)
‘occured first at this time as a result of floristic influences spreading from the
Balkans. The crown level of oak trees lets sunlight permeate. Consequently
‘oak forests have thick undergrowth as opposed to beech woods which grow
a closed foliage resulting in a poor development of shrubs. Alder and
hombeam, which formed parkland as well as fragmentary forests were present
but played a minor role.
Maximum forest cover lasted
simultaneously with the cooling of climate. First the propor
hombeam increased as temperatures fell and reached the 30 % of non arbor
"7
pollen (NAP). The temperature fell to its minimum around 2600 BC. By the
beginning of the Bronze Age these changes stabilized. As a result of
prolonged forest cover, chemozem soils tumed into brown forest soils. Podzol
formation also started on slopes at higher altitudes.
During the transition between the Copper and Bronze Ages, large
deciduous forests with thick undergrowth occupied the Great Hungarian Plain
in combination with parkland steppe areas. As a consequence of lastingly cool
‘weather the parkland steppe vegetation slowly disappeared and was replaced
by a mixture of beech and oak forests. Bushy hornbeam parkland forests,
‘occupied the extensive floodplains of rivers. Large mixed beech forests
spread over the area of Transdanubia with occassional intrusions by oak, elm
and lime. The closed crown level of these trees limited access to sunlight on
the ground level thus preventing the development of substantial undergrowth.
‘The shrub and grass levels were enriched only by occasional extra sunlight
in the areas where trees fell. During the Subboreal Phase, referred
nomenclature developed for the
jeterioriation of the climate started
Carpathian Basin, a slow but deci
Which lasted until 2000 BC.
‘The changes in vegetation resulting from this gradual cooling process
influenced the fauna as well as its exploitation. In spite of their complex
al data also reflect the trend of the warm and dry
ic to become cool and humid by the Bronze Age
'Boikényi (1974a) this climatic change may have been one of the
factors that led to a decrease in the exploitation of domestic animals for
example at the settlement of Tészeg — Laposhalom in the great Hungarian
Plain. On the other hand, a clear diachronic increase in the contribution of
animals occurs at the tell site of J4szd6zsa - Képolnahalom (BOkOnyi
1992), This may be largely due to the contribution of red deer, for example,
which remains high in the bone inventories of sites located in the ecozone
between the plain and the hilly northem region (e.g. Als6vadész.- Vérdomb
and Mende ~ Lednyvér; Choyke 1984a). This trend, however, may often be
overestimated when antler fragments are taken into consideration as wel
‘Shed antler may be gathered at any time. Consequently, pieces of antler in a
faunal assemblage may be indicative of red deer habitats, but do not
‘necessarily mean intensive hunting (Choyke 1987).
‘The keeping of domestic animals itself is influenced by an interaction
between local geographical conditions, the physiological capacity of
animals and the culturally determined expectations of the human population18
(Choyke 1983). Animal species also compete with each other within the
subsistence economy. Due to their complementary habitat preferences and
relatively rapid reproduction Caprids and
keeping of sheep and/or
‘goat often in favour of pig, a species preferring more humid, forested habitats.
This tendency is clearly apparent at later Bronze Age occupation sites such
as the animal remains from the Fuzesabony and Koszider culture layers of
‘Tészeg ~ Laposhalom (BokOnyi 1952), the Gyulavarsénd culture fauna of
Békés ~ Véroserd6 (BokOnyi 1974b), and the Tumulus culture bone material
from Igar — Vémpuszta (Choyke 1984b). This tendency is, however, less
Pronounced in the Great Hungarian Plain (Choyke 1984b: Table 8).
3.3 The Subboreal Phase
‘The weather characterized by heavy precipitation became somewhat drier
at this time. Among the arboreal species forming forests the percentual
contribution of common beech (Fagus sylvatica) decreased. At the same time,
the importance of oak (Quercus sp.) and hazelnut (Corylus aveliana)
somewhat increased. Palynological research showed that atthe time of the
‘Late Bronze Age (around 1300 BC) anew climatic deterioration started which
lasted until the beginning of the Iron Age. This period is referred to as the
time of late Subboreal cooling (1450/1300 BC - 800/600 BC).
Asa result of the Late Bronze Age climatic deterioration the previous
continental character of vegetation also changed and species of Subatlantic
temperatures
cessation of climatic extremes, All these led to a change in the soil’s water
budget. The levels of both still waters and rivers as we
raised. Floods common characteristic, many low areas were constantly
covered by water.
In contrast to the mixed oak forests of the Neolithic, Bronze Age beech
forests were characterized by a very small number of species and thus did not
provide sufficient amounts of nutrients for subsistence gatherers, This led to
large scale deforestation, aimed at opening areas forthe cultivation of grains
id legumes which secured a more reliable source of nutrients. Pollen
diagrams show that in the case of weeds and other wild plants both the number
of species and number of individuals increased during the Late Bronze Age.
19
‘This may be regarded as a direct consequence of forest clearing (Z6lyomi
1980). The second great deforestation period of the Hortobgy area may be
dated tothis time (Léczy 1988). Itis for this reason that, in addition to climatic
‘changes, tuman influences (the effects of plant cultivation, grazing and forest
clearing) must also be taken into consideration as part of the study of
‘vegetation cover from the Atlantic Phase.
Subsequent climatic changes followed only at the beginning of the
Subatlantic Phase. In archaeological terms, this started during the Iron Age
(800/600 BC - 0) and continues even today. Botanical evidence suggests that
the continental character ef the climate became more pronounced, the water
table sunk. The cool, rainy but balanced climate of the Subboreal Phase tumed
drier but milder. This resulted in a mountain character in the vegetation of
extensive floodplains. Natural vegetation in the Great Hungarian Plain was
replaced by land cultivation, cop production and animal keeping cultures. AS
a consequence of decreasing precipitation beech forests retreated. Oak forests
mixed with Tatarian maple populating the eess elevations in peripheral areas
and in addition oak forests characterized by the presence of lily of the valley
in sandy plains suffered a particular decline. The vegetation of areas under
constant water cover did not change.
‘The reduction of natural vegetation which was alsc due to anthropogenic
luences led to the increasing desolation of the plains. As a result of drier
te and the retreat of forested areas, the formation of chemozem-type
started in the Great Hungarian Plain,4, Plant cultivation culture
vation during the Early Bronze Age
ature there isa tendency to view the subsistence
of prehistoric societies in a normative manner, i.e. as single homogeneous
units and under single labels like “settled agriculturalists". On the other hand,
local conditions, both cultural and environmental exercise an influence over
the nature of species found at each individual settlement (Choyke 1983).
At the beginning of the Bronze Age, around 2000 BC, the people of the
Pit Grave Kurgans of steppe origin arrived to the Carpathian Basin from the
‘east. Animal keeping is supposed to have been their chief form of subsistence.
Atthe same time, people pract cultivation came from the south. The
merger of these two different lifestyles gave rise to the Z6k culture. The
culture covered by this collectiv
i several groups characterized by different ways of life. The
population which inhabited the Nyirség area in Easter Hungary was more
involved with transhumant animal keeping and ci
settlements. The Mak6 and Vutedol groups, on
of the Pit Grave Kurgans of steppe origin (Kali
archaeobotanical material from the Z6k culture is known only
sf Pécs — Nagydrpdd (Hartyanyi and Nov4ki 1975; the majority
summarized here. Newly excavated sites are referred to
ith the exception of dwarf wheat (Triticum aestivum subsp.
dicoccum), barley (Hordeum vuigar
(Pisum sativum).
Archacobotanical finds from the Nagyrév culture site of Dunaféldvér —
Klvéria are indicative of widespread gardening and crop cultivation (Gyula,
sntils (Lens culinaris) and peas
preliminary data). Of the grain remains, cincom occurred in significant
number of seeds from narrow-leaved vetch (Vicia angu:
present. Vicia species of Mediterranean origin, which ar
of the Bronze Age. The weed flora was very variable as
(Agrostemma githago), field brome (Bromus arvensis),
(Chenopodium album), black bindweed (Fallopia convolvulus), common
knotgrass (Polygonum aviculare). Tis site provided the earliest flax (Linum
discovered in the pros
cone of the houses. A significant quantity of acoms from oak (Quercus sp.)
‘came to light from the same part of the settlement. This hoard may have been
gathered in the mixed oak forests in the area for the purposes of human
consumption.
‘Additional data on Early Bronze Age plant cultivation are provided by
archaeobotanical finds brought
‘eincom. The deposit also included barley
cleaning and
the removal of chaff following the harvest. This hypothesis is supported by
the evidence of spike axes and spikelets. The relative absence of weed seeds
points to the same possibility.
4.2 Plant cultivation during the Middle Bronze Age
‘Transhumant animal husbandry characteristic of the Early Bronze Age
‘was replaced by a sedentary agricultural way of life combined with animal
keeping by the Middle Bronze Age. This change started in the Great
‘Hungarian Plain and the Danube river seems to have played the role of a major
barrier to the westem extent of this pattem, Thus it reached Transdanubia at
a later time, and even then, it remained mostly
‘Transdanubia. The origin of cultures who lived in the previously mentioned
areas provides partial explanation of this phenomenon.
Of the two significant Early Bronze Age cultures of the Great Hungarian
Plain, the Nagyrév culture had southem connections, while the Hatvan culture
seems to have be linked with the east. As a consequence of its origin, the
Hatvan culture was relatively late in abandoning simple animal husbandry- Although the origins of the Middle Bronze Age
cultures in Transdanubia were varied, they developed an undoubtedly more
homogeneous way of life. The Bell Beaker culture, which arrived from the
west, practised steppe-type animal keeping similar to people of the
Kisapostag and Transdanubian Lime Incrusted Ware cultures. This latter
2410 the natural environment of Transdanubia of those
ir as cultures involved with more advanced land
concemed, a strong correlation was found between the so
geographical distributions of cultures, The Nagyrév and Vs
which the latter may be considered a descendant of the former, occupied
fertile chernozem type soils in the central section of the Great Hungarian Plain,
as well as on the eastem edge of Transdanubia, The Hatvan culture an:
descendant the Fizesabony culture were distributed over simi
chemozem regions in the north of the Great Hungarian Pl
1975).
‘The richest finds of seeds and fruits came
of the Vatya and Nagyrév cultures. These are located in the pro.
ture hill forts does not extend beyond
the fertile Mez6f01d region.
Archacobotanical investiga
systematically in recent years, cast light on the
tell settlements of the Vatya and Ottomény cultur later a survival from
the Early Bronze Age). Archaeobotanical materials recovered from sites of
the Middle Bronze Age Vatya culture are indicative of the
that have been carried out more
tant grain species
while barley (Hordeum valgare) occupied the second place. Of the other
chaffed wheat spe icum turgidum subsp. dicoccum) played
only a minor role, heat (Triticum aestivam subsp. spelta)
‘occurred only in the ic finds. Although no quantities of rye
cereale) were brought to light, the consistent presence of its remains
sistent cultivation of this plant. The grains were cleaned
2B
bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis) and white goosefoot (Chenopodium
album), are indicative of spring sowing. Since no other weed remains were
found, and spontaneous floristic Were rare, it is 100 early to discuss
ns of the vegetation and climatic reconstruction.
noteworthy, however, that species of the steppe vegetation, for
example fescue (Festuca sp.), are absent. The same holds true for weeds which
are indicators of a continental climate such as wild oat (Avena fatua), and
even weeds which prefer warmer climates, for example comcockle
spontaneously
nigra) and blackthom (Prunus spinosa), are found as
which we know to have been gathere
from the forest margins, from strips of un:
plant species
first group may have ori
Szizhalombatta — Foldvér (Gyulai, unpublished
Significant quantities of seed finds were
of excavations at the late Vatya culture hill fort of Mende — Leényvér
(Hantyanyi, Novaki yy 1968; Hantyényi and Novéki 1974), Similar
amounts of emmer (Triticum turgidum subsp. dicoccum) and eincom
(Triticum monococeum) were found, The remains of
included fragments ‘axes. The quantity
(Hordeum vulgare subsp.
white goosefoot (Chenopo
incon and emmer) and spring
shown by both the numbers of
settlement of Tiszaalpér — Vérdomb located by the Tisza river (Hartyényi
1982). When these samples are compared, eincom turns ut to have been the
‘most Important wheat species. Amelcom is fepresented by a smaller number
of grains, which were most! with those of eincom. Ahhough dwarf
wheat was also identi ust have played only a negligibie role. In
addition to eincom, barley was the most important cereal cultivated at this
site. In addition to the seeds of common barley (Hordeum vulgare subsp.24
hhexastichum), grain from common gromwell (Hordeum vulgare subsp.
hexastichum var. nudum) was also found. The identifiable species of weeds
in these samples include field bromegrass (Bromus arvensis), rye brome
(Bromus secalinus), comcockle (Agrostemma githago), common gromwell
lack bindweed (Fallopia convolvulus), common
knotgrass (Polygonum aviculare), white goosefoot (Chenopodium album)
and lesser bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis), The presence of these weeds is
indicative of the cultivation of predominantly autumn cereals.
Of the protein rich legumes lentils (Lens culinari), peas (Pisum sativum)
and a new species, chickling vetch (Lathyrus sativus) were cultivated. The
raw seeds of the papilionaceous chickling vetch are poisonous. It may
therefore be assumed that these seeds were roasted or cooked prior 10
consumption, thereby rendering inactive their toxic ingredients.
Before archaeobotanical find material from the previously mentioned
‘Nagyrév culture settlement of Dunafoldvar — Kalvaria became available for
study, the earliest known occurrence of flax (Linum usitatissimum) was
recorded from the tel settlement of Tiszaalpér — Vardomb. Carbonized seeds
from this plant are of remarkably small size at both settlements, The scarce
occurrence of flax is particularly surprising since seed samples from Western
and Central Europe show that from the Ne mnwards, linen seeds served
asa major source of Papaver somniferum) and the
i sativa), Flax was also known
due to bias in these samp
jietary patterns. Namely, animal fats may
‘The inventory of legumes cultivated since the Early Bronze Age,
Lednyvér, Szdzhalombatta — Foldvér, B&leske — VOrdsgyir,
Laposhalom (Gyulai 1992),
Subsequent investigations (Gyulai, unpublished data) corroborated the
evidence for legumes atthe site of Szézhalombatta ~ Foldvér.
Of the species of chaffed wheat mentioned earlier, eincorn and emmer
‘were the most widely distributed. However, although the cultivation of bare
seeded common wheat (Triticum aestivum) was not very significant at this
time, it was identified at several sites (Hantyényi and Novaki 1975; Kroll
Arokt6 ~ Dongdhalom, Fels6dobsza - Vardomb, Jészd6zsa. —
Képolnahalom, Tészeg — Laposhalom, Feudvar/Vojvodina — Yugoslavia,
25
Barca — Véthegy near Kosice in the entire Carpathian Basin.
hypothesized that the find of these seeds placed insi
container together with remains of eincom and emmer, has cult significance
(Hajnalové 1991). In contrast to the earlier views, it can now demonstrated
that this species of chaffed wheat also originates from the Middle East
(Zohary and Hopf 1988).
‘The geographical distribution of species
in the Triticum genus is to
some extent pattemed (Fig. 1). The various wheat finds indicate two major
regions. The first of these covers the easter and northeastem sections of
‘Transdanubia as well as the northem
ion between the Danube and Tisza
ant wheat species while emmer and
Jay only secondary roles. The second area includes the left
bank of the Tisza river and the eastem section of the area between the Danube
and Tisza rivers. Amelcom is the dominant wheat species within this region.
In regions where these two areas overlap with each other (Tészeg —
Laposhalom, Mende ~ Leényvér, Tiszaalpér— Vardomb) eincom and emmer
were cultivated in comparable proportions. This distribution suggests that,
although there were differences between the wheat species cultivated in
various regions, they do not demarcate a distinct boundary. Clear cut
boundaries between the Bronze Age cultures in Hungary do not emerge from
‘ consideration of other forms of archaeological data,
Barley occurs in all the archaeobotanical samples from this period. It
Ihave been the second most important cereal (both for human
consumption and animal feed) in the Carpathian Basin during the Middle
Bronze Age. The quantity of barley seeds is usually greater than those of
wheat species indicating that barley must have been more widely distrit
in Early and Middle Bronze Age Europe than wheat. The contribu
barley may be as much as 90 % of the cereal crop in Northem Europe
(Bakkevig 1991).
This situation was
consequence of the fact that the e:
of wheat,
demanding in terms of s and needs less precipitation. Barley may
achieve favourable yields even in arid environments, The preference for
barley cultivation supports the theory that, in spite of occasional rainstorms|: The distribution of wheat
(Updated map after Nov
“The dingram shows the geogepticd
lbotion ofthe semsmanze!
pereonge of wheat peice
Beep 23 for detailed explosion.
2
and floodings, the climate was warmer and drier during the Middle Bronze
‘Age than in subsequent Late Bronze Age times (Evenari 1982),
By studying the species proportions of grain samples from Hungary it
may be concluded that barley was the second most important cereal crop
cultivated by the peoples who inhabited the Carpathian Basin during the Early
and Middle Bronze Ages.
ties in identification, detailed descriptions.
wed barley (Hordeum vulgare subsp.
distichum) is known from Tis .~ Bashalom and'T¢steg.- Laposhalom.
The nude variety (Hordeum vulgare subsp. distichum var. nudum) occurred
at Szérhalombatta ~ Foldvar. Both the chatfed and nude varieties of common
(Hordeum vulgare subsp. hexastichim — Baracs - Bottydnsénc;
deum vulgare subsp. hexastichum var. nudum ~ Dunadjvéros ~ Koszider)
is peculiar that oat was identified only as a weed (Avena fatu
zaeszldr — Bashalom,
ted only by sporadic finds during the Neo
gained importance as a major cereal species during the Middle Bro
(Boleske — Vorisgyir, Tiszalue ~ Dankadomb, T6szeg — Laposhalom),
The carliest occurrence of rye (Secale cereale) in the Carpathian Basin
ited to this period as well (Arokt6 — Dongéhalom). Palynological
ions provided evidence of continuous rye cultivation from the end
nze Age,
Weeds in the Chenopodium genus, related to white goosefoot prefer
nitrogen rich soils and may be considered ruderalia, Their remains occur as
‘archaeobotanical samples of almost all excavations.
‘A hoard of cleaned many-seeded goosefoot (Chenopodium poly-
spermum) seeds recovered from a house at the Vatina cul
everyday consumption. This find may aso be inten
tof fishing baits (Kroll 1990a). Seeds of rocket (Sisymbrium sp.),
flixweed (Descurainia sp.) and marsh spurge (Euphorbia palustris) recovered28
in the form of accumulations at the same site may have served medicinal
purposes 1990b).
“The cultivation of flax is illustrated by several remains as well. Evidence
of this plant is known in the form of remains from a string found at the Sz6reg
Bronze Age C cemetery, while sporadic seed finds were identified in the
sample from Tiszaalpér. This evidence, however, is not sufficiently
substantial to answer the question of wheter the seeds were used in oil
production or as a dye. Flax was not the only source of oil in this period.
Bronze Age people cultivated gold of pleasure (Camelina sativa) and poppy
(Papaver somniferum) as oil plants (Hopf and Blankenhorn 1987). Both the
seeds and podlets of gold pleasure were found at the Pécsvérad ~ Nagyérpéd
site of the Z6k culture. Seed hoards of this plant recovered at
Feudvar/Vojvodina are good illustrations the significance of this plant (Kroll
1991). To date, no unambiguous evidence, for the use of poppy (Papaver
somniferum) is available.
‘The archaeobotanical study of Ottomény culture finds from Trkeve ~
Terehalom has not yet been completed (Gyulai, unpublished data).
Preliminary results, however, show that plant cultivation at that settlement
‘was not radically different from the agriculture of the Vatya culture, and they
are representative of the exploitation of plants in Middle Bronze Age cultures.
to eincom and emmer, developed forms of barley ((Hordeum
um), jetils and ervil occured. On the
fe milletis surprising. Seeds of various
weeds found among the remains of grain are suggestive of cereal associations
sown during the autumn. These weeds were identified as green goosegrass
(Galium spurium), brome (Bromus sp.), black bind
convolvulus) which all
remains recovered are al indicative of lime rich, fertile butnot fertilized loess
soils. The great number of seeds from white goosefoot found on the floor
levels of burnt down houses point to the deliberate accumulation of these
seeds for the purposes of consumption. Safflower (Cartamus tinctorius), @
ic plant may have been grown to provide face paints. The species
mn of this seed assemblage is similar to that of the archaeobotanical
material gathered at the Feudvar/V tell settlement excavated by the
Tisza river (Kroll 1990a).
2»
ion during the Late Bronze Age
According to palynological research carried out in the Balaton region, the
incidence of cereal pollens increased during the second half of the Bronze
‘Age. This must be a direct consequence of expanding ploughland cultivation
(Zoryomi 1980). The same trend is illustrated by the great number of pollens
from ploughland weeds such as comflower (Centaurea sp.), plantain
(Plantago sp.), polygonums (Polygonum sp.) and dock (Rumex sp.
‘Around 1300 BC, that is during the Middle Bronze Age, tel settlements
created by centuries of continuous habitation were abandoned. A new culture
arrived in the Carpathian Basin from an eastem direction. It is known as the
‘Tumulus culture. Itis predominantly the cemeteries ofthese people which are
the chief form of subsistence practised by this group.
‘At the same time, archaeobotanical finds brought to light from a Tumulus
culture refuse pit at the settlement of Balatonmagyaréd ~ Hidvégpuscta
provide evidence of a highly developed horticulture (Gyulai, unpublished
seeds of pea:
Common millet
wwere excavated not surprising that grain accumulations were
not discovered.
On the other hand, grain finds dominate the archaeobotanical material
from the Late Bronze Age settlement of Gér (Gyulai, unpublished data.
‘Samples gathered from the thick carbonized grain deposit found at the bottom
‘of one of the refuse pits offers a glimpse of plant cultivation at ths site. Small
spelt was the most important cereal species followed by emmer. Rye was the
third most important bread cereal in terms of the number of seed specimens.
Finds of barley lagged behind considerably. Spelt wheat also occurred. Great
numbers of chaffed wheat as well as fragments of spike axes from barley
indicate that threshing and cleaning preceded storage. The presence of
legumes is limited to lentils in this assemblage.
‘The number of individuals calculated for weeds, however, is great. Weed
species include wild oat (Avena fatua), comcockle (Agrostemma githago),
rye brome (Bromus secalinus), field bromegrass (Bromus arvensis), upright
‘brome (Bromus erectus), white goosef00t (Chenopodium album), wall barley
(Hordeum murinum) and green goosegrass (Galium spurium). These weeds
are indicative of autumn sowing.in settlement pattern and way Increasing precipitation as well
as fear from attacks by other peoples probably played a role in these develop-
‘ments, At the same time, these long lived fortified settlements also represent.
increased specialization in labour; that is they may have served as centres for
trading and craft activities. They probably also formed nodes within a network
Of settlements which has not yet been fully investigated.
‘The increasing importance of agriculture - and crop cultivation in
Particular — is supported by both archaeological and archaeobotanical
‘evidence (see Table 2). In addition to the great numer of sickle finds, rich
seed deposits are also known from this period (see
According to the
the Gava culture
settlement of Poroszl6 — Aporh Is were cultivated. Seeds
in the sample show that emmer
however, was cultivated in alm
same quantity. The third most
frequently encountered species was common wheat, represented by half as
many seeds as spelt wheat, Re incom occurred only in negligible
d forms of genetically improved wh
were cultivated. In contrast to eincom, the cultivation ofthese wheats
required improved agricultural techniques, A
(Trifolium repens) may be regarded as the
vidence of pasturing
‘wheat and common wheat are known from the site
the Titel area (Kroll 1991). The role of barley,
however, remained dominant and the consumption of true millet was also
Popular.
Seeds recovered from the Middle Umifield culture settlement at
Feudvar/Vojvodina (12th to 9th century BC) are representative of plant
ation during the Late Bronze Age and Early Iron Age. In addition to
ym and emmer, more improved forms of barley, re, common wheat true
lentils, chickling vetch, flax and poppy were grown. Part of the
ed remains mixed withthe seeds and grains ~ a plant association
autumn sowing ~ could be idemtfied as well, The cereal weeds
luded orlaya (Orlaya grandifio
common homed poppy
stia paniculata), hare's ear
f= bomebean (Via faba)
f= goldot pleasure Camlin tvs)
Figure 2: Seed and fruit remains from Hungary
(Updated after Hartydnyi 1982)
3132
forking larkspur (Consolida regalis), field madder (Sherardia arvensis) blue
‘woodruff (Asperula arvensis), green goosegrass (Gallium spurium), groun
pine (Ajuga cham:
dentata) which all point
seeds recovered from the sample a
soil which, was not however, ad
Borojevi¢ 1988). A special h
the safflower (Cartham
material for face paints (Kroll 19908).
‘The high number of als obtained for legumes in the kitchen
garden (Vicia ervilia, Lens culinaris, Pisum sativum) is a new phenomenon,
although the values obtained for Lathyrus sativus and Vicia faba are
significantly smaller. It is possible, that their cultivation is associated with
the continuous development of agricultural echnologies. Could an increasing
demand for plant proteins have stimulated the intensifying cultivation of
ing of the first millennium BC?
ig of eincom. In addition the weed
ive ofa lime rich and fertile locss
‘enriched using manure (Kroll and
f Bronze Age people may be illustrated by
5) find which could possibly serve as a raw
{ed to the same period, Short-handled Bronze Age scythes may have
for harvesting grass. The storage of hay thus
Inthe Late Bronze Age of Hungary, remains of flax are known only from
the Late Bronze Age layer of Lengyel. The chronological position of this
stratum was revised on the basis of its archaeobotanical material (Hartyényi,
nigra/racemosa). Water-chestnut (Trapa natans) may have been gathered
of rivers for the purposes of either alimentation or
).
reaches 200 square meters. A variety of buildings stood within these areas.
3
‘The demographic explosion that took place during the period of the
‘Umield culture may be understood when the original natural environment,
requirements as well as yields of cultivated
ized predominantly medium
loughland and horticultural
compact, fertile soils with high water tables
cultivation,
‘The Late Bronze Age settlement structure consisted of “fortified towns”
‘occupying large areas as well as smaller farming units. Itis possible even that
slave labour was exploited at the latter type of settlements.
4.4 The evolution of weed associations
One of the most important questions which naturally follows from
‘by the typical coexistences of certain characteristic species, provide 2 good
basis for studying the natural vegetation. Plant associations occupy well
separated habitats. It is for this reason that as basic units in plant sociology
they provide the best key to the ecological characterization of an arca. The
development of present plant associations is the result of a long process.
‘Consequently, direct extrapolations to prehistoric times are prone to a number
of biases. In archaeobotany, the complete set of plant materials retrieved is
called thanatocoenosis, while plant remains reflecting human influence on the
vegetation are distinguished by the term palaeobiocoenosis(Willerding 1986).
Duc to the great number of criteria involved, ecological eval
ut using cumputers. The richer the inventory of taxa obtained during the
course of excavations, the more reliable the resuts of such analyses will be.
Plant remain from te Umeld culture segarding culvated species)
are indicati
to those found at some larger Ni
apparent, that the contribution of species gathered at the forest edge is
significantly smaller. At the same time, Late Bronze Age ploughland weed
associations became similar to those a difference emerged
‘between groups of weeds characteristic of autumn sowing (Seacalinetea) and
those indicative of spring sowing (Polygeno-Chenopodietalia). As a
atic changes, the vegetation of
periods, fewer bushes
provided edible fruits and seeds. The species composition of Late Bronze Age
‘grazing areas was not essentially different from those of modem pastures.34
Depending on the immediate environment, marshy meadows in the parkland
habitats of floodplains were formed by associations characterized by creeping
bent (Agrostetum albac), meadow foxtail (Alopecuretum pratensis) and
‘meadow fescue (Festucetum pratensis). In Transdanubia similar habitats are
dominated by tufted hair-grass associations (Deschampsietum caepositum).
Marshy meadows with purple moor-grass associations (Molinietum
coeruleae) seem to have been common in the Nyfrség region of northeastem.
Hungary, between the Danube and Tisza rivers and in Transdanubia, In hilly
areas and mountain habitats pastures characterized by red fescue and dogstail
(Festuco rubrae-Cynosuretum) provided fodder for cattle rearing,
Seed and fruit remains and ploughland weed associations represent an
abundant source of information. The life cycles of certain weeds adapted to
those of the
conditions, the use of manure, changes in crop rotation ete,
Seed remains from weeds also show that in prehistoric times cereals were
harvested at medium height, somewhere between the spike and ground
These plants were rarely cut more closel;
round level. At the same time, emmer could be harvested
‘common wheat
43. Bronze Age viniculture and fruit consumption
optimum of the Adantic Phase, the distribution area
sylvestris) reached far beyond the Carpathian Basin.
the form of numerous finds thatthe fruit ofthis plant
‘was gathered in many parts of Europe as early as the Neolithic and the Copper
Age. lis occurrences were recorded, in Northern Italy, Belgium and
Switzerland (Stummer 1911), Greece’ and Spain (Hopf 1978), Germany
(Schiemann foravia (Opr
Sweden (Hjelmay’
‘Auvemier (Lake Neue
of domestication, that
mn toward the domestic form (Vitis
vinifera; Villaret-Rochow 1971). This plant was also known from the Atlantic
Phase in Hungary. It was found near Szombathely in westem Hungary
Late Neolithic Lengyel culture settlement of Sé (Facsar and Jerem 19
Additional Bronze Age woodland grape finds from Europe include
specimens from various floodplain areas of the Danube river, the Po plain,
surrounds of Lake Garda and Parma, Bosnia and Germany (Stummer
1911; Ammerman et al. 1978; Bertsch and Bertsch 1949).
Materials recovered at Bronze Age sites in the Balkans and coastal areas
of the Mediterranean play an important role in tracing the evolution of
common grape. Although seeds of woodland grape were recovered from
archaeobotanical samples gathered at the sites of the late Dimini culture
(Arapi, Sesklo, Pefkakia) and Tolkos (Greece), even these may be regarded
as evolutionary stages in the evolution of common grape (Renfrew 1966).
According to the opinion of Renfrew (Kroll 1983) the oldest find of common
‘rape came to light at the site of Dikili-Tash (2400 BC).
In addition to the possible Anatolian origins of common grape, Facsar
assumes that the actual site of grape domestication should be sought
somewhere in Palestine, Egypt or Syria (Facsar and Jerem 1985). He neither
denies nor confirms the possibili grape seeds found at the site of
Kastanas, northern Makedonia (Ki ) belong to the domestic form, In
fi i ical and metrical indices, and the
Fequires immense expertise.
In contrast to the Bronze Age of the areas mentioned above, no evidence
of early viticulture is available in the form of seed finds from this period in
Hungary. Although a bumt piece of a vine shoot came to light from the
Gyulavarsénd culture layer of the tell settlement at Békés ~ Vérdomb, this
ed from woodland grape (Valké and
Before the unambiguous archacobotanical
evidence of seeds is available, indirect finds such as the large size
‘essel known from the Nagyrév culture cannot be accepted as
viniculture (Hartyényi and Novaki 1975).
Having reviewed the archaeobotanical finds from Bronze Age sit
became apparent that Bronze Age people often gathered vitamin rc
fruits and berries available in their most immediate environmer
Archaeobotanical finds indicative of consumption, hoarding or perhaps even
preservation (jam, syrup etc.) of these fruits include the following species
blackberry (Rubus caesius) from Tiszaalpér, elder and red elder from the sites
of Arokt6 ~ Dongéhalom and J4szd6zsa ~ Kpolnahalom, Comelian cherry
(Corus mas) from the J4szd6zsa— K4polnahalom and Lengyel settlements,
crab apple (Malus sylvestris) from the hill fort of Pékozd — Var, and
blackthom (Prunus spinosa) from Bolcske ~ Vordsgyir (Hartyényi, Novaki
and Patay 1968; Hartyényi and Novaki 1974),4.6 The agriculture of Bronze Age people
Late Bronze Age people divided cultivated lands into ploughlands,
gardens, pastures, orchards and possibly hop growing areas as well as
vineyards (?). Plots exploited by forestry and fisheries may also have been
delineated (Goldmann 1987). These areas may have replaced each other
during the course of cultivation. Shallow lakes, when drained, may have
served as fertile ploughland for cereals. Ploughlands, in general, were
ion of the cultivated areas was, in many w
cal analysis of Umfield culture archaeobotanical finds from
‘Hagnau - Burg in the Lake of Constance region (R8sch 1991).
‘Areas designated for subsequent land cultivation were cleared using the
slash and bur method then cleaned of leftover plant remains. While land
tillage was frequently practiced using ploughs in this period, evidence for the
direct restoration of soil fertility is unknown. Fields were continuously used
until their prod potential was completely exhausted. Once this
happened, new areas, perhaps pastures, were brought into cultivation, and the
previously exploited pieces of land were abandoned to ensure’ natural
recovery.
At the beginning of the Bronze Age, differences existed between the
agricultural practises pursued in the southeastern and central parts of Europe.
In the Balkans and particularly in northem Bulgaria, the recuperation of soils
was facilitated by the inundation of alluvial flats as is shown by tell
settlements in the region (Todorova 1982). Furrows were made in the soil
thus loosened before the sowing of cereals. In Central Europe, fields were
cultivated using wooden ploughs pulled by oxen. The oldest specimens of,
ploughs with a shoe are known from the Mediterranean region. They are dated
1o the end of the third and beginning of the second millenni
‘conceming the use of ploughs with a so
middle of the second millennium. In addition to the actual remains of ploughs
and prehistoric ploughmarks are also known in northem and northwestern
Europe (Balassa 1973),
The requirements of ploughland cult in the Carpathian Basin
existed by the beginning of the third millennium BC, ploughland crops and
draft animals were available, wagons and hamesses were known. Its for this
reason that one may reasonably assume that by the end of that millennium,
37
ploughing was practiced in this region as well (Balassa 1973), The dominant
wheat species was eincom in the Balkans as well as in the eastern part of
Central Europe, while in the rest of Central and Western Europe emmer was
predominantly cultivated.
‘The per capita annual grain consumption during this period may be
estimated as 200 kg. Minimum wheat yields may have been 150 kg/ha wheat
orthe equivalent in the form of other grains (Goldmann 1982). Consequently,
a cultivated land surface of 1000 square ters could theoretically
support 800 000 people. Taking into consideration Early Bronze Age
agricultural standards, one square kilometre of ploughland may have provided
grain for 75 pe estimation, however, also includes areas unaffected
by agricultural cultivation. On the other hand, population density was well
below these estimations during the period under discussion here. In Denmark,
for example, estimations resulted in a
(Poulsen 1983). Due to the previous!
liscrepancy means there is no
explosion.
4.7. Grain processing and storage
In the case of chaffed forms of wheat cultivated during prehistoric times
atthe spike was separated into spikelets. In order to obtain
aff also had to be removed. This could not be achieved by
since ground chaff makes flour unpalatable. The removal of chaff
‘may be achieved in two different ways: roasting and softening. Experimental
archaeological investigations showed that roasting in a special dish is a very
efficient method, however, in spite of all the effort, chaff
‘completely removed using this technique. On the other hand, sof
subsequent, heating for several hours loosened the chaff to such an extent that
it became separated from the grain and could be removed by winnowing, Even
the toughest pieces of chaff could be easily removed by hand shelling. When
‘emmer was heated for two hours to 50 centigrades, the removal of chaff took
less than two hours (Meurers-Balke 1985).
A great number of pits are usually encountered during the course of
excavations on Bronze Age settlements. The majority of these features are
‘automatically classified as refuse pits on the basis of their fills, while others
are identified as grain storage pits. This latter, widely discussed, group of
features is characterized by “bee-hive” shaped pits which have a narrow toptowards the base. Their walls are usually unplastered and are
sometimes fired. It is suggested here, that these pits were indeed suitable for
ge of threshed and cleaned grain for varying lengths of time.
‘Willerding (1970), on the other hand, doubts that storage pits excavated at the
Late Copper Age Baden culture settlement near Ossarn in Austria could have
served such a purpose. Late Bronze Age pits excavated at the site of Palkau.
and Burgschl Iso in Austria, seem to have been used for storing grain,
although they were mixed with seeds from legumes (Wemeck 1949). A
“storage pit” with plastered walls was found at the Urnfield culture settlement
of Ichterhausen in Germany. Grain seeds at the bottom of this feature were
indicative of its function (Schultze-Motel and Gall 1967).
pits was not the only way grain was stored. At
forward by Knorzer (1972), who recovered the
jich may have been a bam at the Bronze Age
settlement of Langweiler in Germany. Bumt seeds of wheat and barley were
found in the post holes of this building.
lar to those in neighboring countries,
also occur in Hungary. They may be. ‘on the basis of evidence in the
form of grains recovered by water sieving from their fill, Questions
concerning grain storage pits from Hungary were discussed comprehensively
by Novki (1983). On the basis of archaeobotanical finds brought to light at
the Early Bronze Age Z6k/Vutedol culture settlement of Pécs — Nagyérpad
only one of the numerous pits
Bronze Age Fiizesabony culture settlement of Arokt6 - Dongéhalom. Dishes
from the Middle Bronze Age settlement of Sz4zhalombatta ~ Foldvar
elonging to the Vatya cultre contained grain carbonized by burning. Pits
without plastering or firing were excavated at the Vatya culture tell site of
Boleske ~ Vordsgyir. Pits were also investigated in the Late Bronze Age
layers of Lengyel - Snc, the Late Bronze Age Gava culture site of Poroszi6
= Aporhét as well as the Umfield culture sites of Bakonszentkirdly —
‘Zorbghegy and Gér. A common feature of all these pits is that they contained
carbonized seed remains from cultivated plants mixed with a variety of other
antfacts, It seems therefore that these features were not true grain storage pits.
Cereal remains may be regarded as secondary deposits in them. According to
the layer that contained grains. One of the skeletons showed signs of violent
death, A similar case was reported by Tempir (1961) from the Aunjenitz
t excavated at the site of Prasklice in Bohemia, Ninety percent
‘ofthe 3to 4 cm thick deposit of carbonized grain in that feature was composed
of emmer, while the remaining ten percent was made up cincom. Three human
skeletons and several vessels were found above this layer.
Grinding must have been a relatively time consuming process. According
to Gunda (1961) two hours of single-handed grinding were required to
jones. When elongated
the length ofthis work
could be somewhat reduced (Hennig 1966). The basic shape of the tw
jones used in processing grain did not change until the Iron Age. The
srinding process took place in three steps, which undoubtedly involved the
use of some sort of sieves (probably made of hair). Naturally, the aim was not
necessarily the production of flour reaching modem industrial qu:
ground to. less refined state probably provided a better raw mater
and cereal meals, According to experimental results, first the grain may have
been roasted at a temperature of 200° centigrade which made rough grinding
easier (Meurers-Balke 1985).40
5, Examinations in nutritional history
5.1. The basis of food analysis:
Prehistoric housewives must have spent many hours of work before grain
‘made its way to the family table in the form of meals. Naturally, everything,
depended on the aims of food preparation. Several questions, however,
remain open. Did cereals play a role in everyday nutrition and were they
served as main meals? What was the proportion of meat, vegetables, fruits
and gathered plants in everyday diet and to what extent was the preparation
of these foods independent from the meals made from grain?
If the procurement of drinking water, fire making and maintenance, the
processing of hides and plant fibres, weaving and sewing as well as the
gathering of medicinal and other plants are considered to have been part of
the daily chores, it becomes apparent that prehistoric women had more than
enough things to do to fill their day. When cooking and baking are added to
this ist, itis clear that only a very short time was eft forthe cleaning of grains
(Chaff removal), no matter how long this activity may have taken.
‘What kinds of food and drink were prepared and consumed in prehistoric
times? Where and under what circumstances might such products be
preserved? Where can food and drink remains be found? How and to what
le to analyze these remains? Is it possible at all to identify
dients and reconstruct the manner in which they were prepared?
the grave famiture
observed during the
of cult behavior. That is, the deceased was supplied with food and drink for
the long joumey tothe “other world”. If so, what sorts of food and drink were
placed by the body during the mortuary ritual?
Food remains are rarely encountered during the excavation of cemeteries
and settlements. Most ofthe organic food components are chemically unstable
and they quickly decompose under the influence of microorganisms. Under
special circumstances of preservation (carbonization caused by charring,
‘water logged deposits, very dry microctimate), however, they may survive.
‘An additional problem is posed by the fact that both great expertise and
ification
methods of microscopy and technically advanced analytical procedures in
chemistry have permitted the appropriately precise study of such occasionally
41
recovered food remains. It is exactly the spora:
‘character and the differential nature of these finds that, although ancient fooc
‘materials carry a lot of information, no standardized methodology has ye
been developed for the comprehensive body of examinations referred to a:
the analysis of food remains. The identification of these finds contributes tc
reconstruction of ancient ways of life and gastronomic history.
Food remains may occu selves (for example flour and meal finds
pieces of bread) or in association with other archaeological artifacts (for
example on the surface of metal objects or stuck to the surface of sherds). The
analysis of stomach contents from mummies as well as moor and glacie:
victims, and scatological studies must also be mentioned here (Richter 1988)
‘The analysis of drink remains is a significantly more complex problert
and is loaded with speculative elements. No prehistoric drink remains are
known to date. It may be assumed, however, that wild fruits and berries wert
used in making preserves and syrups of some sort. Should drinks have beer
made from honey, palyotgia research may be instrumental in providing
evidence for thi
Grtss (193, 1935) identified phosphate remain (possibly orig
among other things, Ik) as well as honey on the inside of pot sherds
‘According to Helck (1971) the consumption of beer may be recognized it
Ancient Egypt after 2900 BC. We does not rule out the
knowledge of beer product
imported from the Mic
listed a number of Egypt
occurrence, specific
ting
‘The existence of Bronze Age viniculture and wine production c
be convincingly demonstrated. On the other hand, the idea of beer prod
‘Age seed and frui
seek the evidence of germinating grains which might have been used i
brewing beer (Kster 1989). In addition to utilizing barley as a raw material
malt may also be produced using all sorts of wheat. According to Medieva
written sources, common hop (Hunulus tupulus) was used in Wester anc
Central Europe in the flavoring and preservation of beer. In Northern Europe
sweet gale (Myrica gale) was used for the same purpose. It is for this reaso1
that the occurrence of these plants in archaeobotanical samples may bx
associated with beer produ hre 1984). However, no such fruit remain,
have yet been found at sites of the Hungarian Bronze Age.a
In spite ofthe fact that rapid burning
‘posure to fire) leads to structural
als, it may also conserve certain
procedures. Thus
remaining parts may become available for microscopic studies. Naturally, the
posse af such analyses always determine by he ae of preservation
‘must occur (Lochte 1951, 1954; Piperno 1987).
Asa result of sophisticated microscopic investi
chemical preparations, morphological de
fragments of the vascular syst
recognizable even after the
itzky (1927) in the microscopic evaluation of
food remains deserves particular attention. A combination of microscopic
techniques and macroscopic analysis was developed by Wahren (1988,
1989) for the evaluation of flour, meal, bread, cake and other food ret
recovered from the lacustrian settlements of Souther Germany
Switzerland. Similar research is pursued by Hjelmqvist (1984, 1990) in
‘Norther Europe, Schlichtherle (1983) in Germany, Richter (1987, 1988) and
‘Wahren (1984, 1987, 1988, 1989b) in Switzerland, as well as Hajnalové
(1989), Pieta and Plaché (1989) in Czechoslovakia. Their research
contributed to the elucidation of the long road that led to the production of
pies and leavened bread, thereby enriching our knowledge of prehistoric
gastronomic culture and food consumption habits.
Instrument aided analytical chemical investigations offer additional
‘possibilities in the evaluation of food remains. Results of such studies permit
conclusions conceming the types of prehistoric foods, their raw materials as
well as the additives used in them, Even the methods of preparation may be
reconstructed,
43
Under the climatic conditions prevalent in the Carpathian Basin, food
remains are usually preserved in a carbonized form, probably as a result of
exposure to relatively mild heat in an anaerobic or at least oxygen poor
environment.
As early as 1916 Maurizio investigated the origins of flat breads
recovered from prehistoric pile dwellings using the analysis of ash. However,
it was only the procedure of modem analytical chemistry (atom emission and
atom absorption spectrophotometry) which made the analysis of the main
‘components and trace elements in food remains possible. Research in this
direction showed that although part of the elements is preserved in
ical food remains, several factors must also be taken into
ion. The partial presence or absence of mobil elements which may
Due to the previously mentioned moderate carbonization caused by
ited group of compounds may be expected to survive. It
t prehistoric food reraains usually do not contain starch,
sugar and protein any more. On the other hand, free amino acids, cholesterol
as well as fatty acids may sometimes be detected,
‘The differential decomposition times of various amino acids resul
proportions between these compounds that change through time (Csap6,
‘Téth-Pésfai and Csap6-Kiss 1986). In grain some 85 to 90 percent of amino
acids decompose during four hundred years, while 93 to 95 percent may
disappear in a 1700-2000 years time interval (J. Csap6, unpublished data). It
is for this reason that the mere presence of amino acids does not provide
sufficient information for reconstructing the types of proteins, their original
concentration and proportions relative to each other. They make, however,
the age determination of organic materials possible. Cnrrent results. have
shown, that as with the amino-acid racemization method used in the dating.
‘of bone remains, the same procedure may be used in the evaluation of
archaeobotanical finds (Csap6, Téth-Pésfai and Csap6-Kiss 1986).
‘Another analytical method is the gas-chromatographic analysis of fatty
these compounds are less sensitive to the influence of heat.
for this reason that their study isa suitable method for identifying the
sources of organic materials of both plant and animal origin (Rottlinder 1983;
Rottlander and Schlichtherle 1980).44
5.2 Food remains in Hungary
‘An increasing number of archaeological excavations have been
accompanied by scientific analyses during the past few decades. As a result,
prehistoric food remains have also been recovered. Remains of carbonized
bread were found following the water-sieving of samples gathered on the floor
level of bumt Ottomény culture houses at the tell settlement of Tiitkeve ~
‘Terchalom (Gyulai, unpublished data). The porosity of charred pieces, that is,
the size and shape of holes, shows the typical structure of leavened bread.
Carbonized food remains recovered from a Tumulus culture refuse
at
‘Although these pieces puffed up as a result of buming, their elongated shape
‘may still be recognized. Germs fell out of these seeds which may be indicative
of cleaning: germs are often lost during the course of threshing and cleaning,
Carbonized lumps of meal, composed of two to ten seeds cemented together,
were also found. The great degree of similarity between these seeds of true
a short period of time, ifnot simultaneously. Itis possible that they were burt
already during the cooking process or subsequently, together with other
antifacts.
When the residue was sorted under a stereo light microscope, numerous
animal remains were found as well. Within this assemblage, the
archaeozoologist I. Takécs identified a number of bones from fish and small
binds, which showed signs of roasting.
‘The material obtained for study also contained a significant number of
carbonized remains originating from a homogeneous but spongy material,
‘They seem to be fragments ofa piece of larger volume. None of the fractured
surfaces displayed holes. bubbles or cracks: the small, round pores were
4
se fine holes cannot be the result of fermentation
caused by Lactobé jicative of the baking of at
evenly kneaded, fine dough. The even porosity is also suggestive of bakin,
at a high temperature in a hot and evenly heated oven.
evenly distributed.
Archaeobotanical investigations by the author on this substance wen
complemented by macroscopic studies carried out by M. Wahren in Bem
Results of microscopic evaluations were contributed by B. Richterin Zirich
Laboratory of the Faculty of Animal Breeding at the Pannon Agricultura
University of Kaposvar all indicated that remains of Bronze Age strawberr,
shortcake were found, The dough was made of wheat flour reaching moden
industrial quality as well as millet flour using lard.46
Summary
‘Around 3000 BC a new phase of Holucene (also known as Flanders
interglacial, beginning 8200 BC) commenced which lasted until 800/600 BC.
In archaeological terms, this period, called the Subboreal Phase, included the
late Neolithic and the entire Bronze Age. The beginring of she Subboreal
Phase (often referred to as BUk I. Phase within the context of the Carpathian
Rasin) was marked by a deterioration of the climate which lasted until
2000 BC.
Subsequently, the rainy climate became somewhat drier. Of the forest
forming tree species, the proportion of beech (Fagus sylvatica) also declined.
tthe same time oak (Quercus sp.) and hazel (Corylus avellana) became more
common. Palynological research showed that a new deterioriation o
Nomadic/transhumant animal husbandry characteristic of the Eatly
Bronze Age, was replaced by a combination of animal keeping and a
sedentary agri
Archaeobot recovered from several sites of the Middle
at ocurred only in or
(Avena farua). True millet (Panicum miliaceum) became a bread cereal during
this time. In the Carpathian Basin, the earliest finds of rye (Secale cereale) are
dated to the same period.
The diet of prehistoric people was made more variable by the continued
{gathering of vitamin rich fruits and berries in the proximity of settlements.
Around 1300 BC people abandoned the tell seitlemenis whose layers had
been created by centuries of occupation. Archaeobotanical finds from the
settlements of the Tumulus culture which arrived in Hungary from the most
show that, in contrast to previous hypotheses, these people practised large scale
land cultivation. The same holds true for the Umfield and Gava culcures, The
high numbers of individuals for plant species characteristic of horticulture is
another new phenomenon. Their production may perhaps be related to new
agricultural technologies which developed at the time,
Food remains from the Late Bronze Age Tumulus culture settlement of
Balatonmagyaréd — Hidvégpuszta shed some light on the gastronomic tradition
of Late Bronze Age people.
References
Ammerman, A. J., Butler, J. J. Diamond, G., Manozzi, P., Pals, J.P., Sevink
4J., Smit, A. and Voorrips, A. 1978, Report on the excavation at Mont
Leoni, A bronze age settlement in the Parma Valley. Helinium 1
126-164,
Arendés, V., 1982, A magyarorszégi archaeobotanikai adatok Osszehasonilt:
vizsgélata (The comparative study of archaeobotanical data fron
Hungary). Agrdrt6rt. Szeml, 24/1-2, 1- 53.
Bakkevig, S., 1991, Charred seeds from Forsandmoen, a prehistoric villag
in SW-Norway. Methods of retrieval and results from the Bronze agc
Palaeoethnobotany and Archaeology. Intemational Work-Group fe
Palaeoethnobotany. 8th Symposium, Nitra- Nové Vozokany 1989. Nitr:
29-36,
Balassa, I, 1973, Az eke és a szntds torténete Magyarorszdgon (The histor
of plough and ploughing in Hungary). Budapest, 630 p.
Bantosiewicz, L., 1990, Species interferences and the interpretation ¢
Neolithic animal exploitation. ActaArchHung 42, 287-292.
Behre, K-E., 1984, Zur Geschichte der Bierwiirzen nach Fruchtfunden un
schriftlichen Quellen. 6th Symposium Falacoethnobotany, Groninge
1983. In: Zeist, W. van and Casparie, W. A. (eds.): Plants and Ancier
‘Man. Boston, 115-122.
Beijerinck, W., 1947, Zadenatlas der nederlendische flora. Wageninget
317 p.
Berenové, M., 1991, Archtologie und Botanik aus der Schicht de
Archiiologen (Anbau von Kulturpflanzen). Palaeoethnobotany an
Archaeology. Intemational Work-Group for Palaeoethnobotany. 8
‘Symposium, Nitra - Nové Vozokany 1989, Nitra, 37-50
Bertsch, K., 1942, Lehrouch der Pollenanalyse. Stuttgart.
Bertsch, K. and Bertsch, F., 1949, Geschichte unserer Kulturpflanzer
Stuttgart, 275 p. @. Aufl).48
Bokonyi Die Wirbelticrfauna der Ausgrabungen in Tészeg vom
Jahre 1948, ActaArchHung 2, 71-113.
Boktinyi, S., 1974a, History of domestic mammals in Central and Eastern
Europe. Akadémiai Kiad6, Budapest, 597 p.
Bokinyi, S., 1974b, Verzeichnis der auf dem Burghilgel gefundenen
Pflanzenreste. In: J. Banner and 1. B6na (eds.): Mittelbronzezeitliche
jedlung bei Békés. Fontes Archaeologici Hungariae, 81-82.
1992, Jagd und Tierzucht. In: Meier-Arendt, W. and I. Fodor
in Ungarn. Forschungen ia Te
und Theiss. Frankfurt am Main, 69-72.
Buunnan, J., 1988, Economy and Environment in Bronze Age West-
Friesland, Noord Holland (from Wetland to Wetland). British
Archaeological Reports, British Series 186, 267-292.
Choyke, A.M., 1983, An analysis ofbone, antler and tooth tools from Bronze
‘Age Hungary. Dissertation, State University of New York, Binghar:ton.
478 p.
Choyke, A. M., 1984a, Faunal information offered by worked bone assem-
blages. ActaArchHung 36, 53-58.
Choyke, A. M., 1984b, An analysis of bone, antler and tooth tools from
Bronze Age Hungary. MitcArchinst 12/13, 1982/1983, 13-57.
Choyke, A. M., 1987, The exploitation of red deer in the Hungarian Bronze
‘Age. Archaeoroologia I (1), 109-116.
Csap6, J., T6tn-Posfai, 1. and Csap6-Kiss, Zs., 1986, Optimization of
Hydrolysis at Determination of Amino acid Content in Food and Feed
Products, Acta Alimentaria, 15 (1). 3-2
Deininger, 1., 1882, Adatok kultimdvényeink torténetéhez. A Lengyel-i
(skoritelep ndvénymaradv ényai (Data tothe history of cultivated plants.
Plant remains from the Lengyel prehistoric settlement). In: Keszthelyi
Magy. Kir, Gazdasdgi Tanint. EvkOnyve, Nagykanizsa,
Evenari, M., 1982, Okologisch-landwirtschafiliche Forschungen in Negev.
/-Siedlungen an Donau
49,
Facsar, G. and Jerem, E., 1985, Zum urgeschichilichen Weinbau in
Mitteleuropa. Rebkemfunde von Vitis vinifera L. aus der umenfelder-,
hallstatt- und laténezeitlichen Siedlung Sopron - Krautacker.
Wissenschafiliche Arbelten aus dem Burgenland 71, 121-144,
Fedorov, P. V. and Skiba, L. A., 1960, Kolebanija urovnej Chemogo i
Kaspinskogo morej v golocene. Moscow, 24-34.
Ferenczy, E., 1958, A magyar fold népeinek tarténete a honfoglalds kordig
(The history of populations on Hungarian Soil up to the time of the
Magyar Conquest). Budapest.
Firbas, P., 1949 and 1952, Spar- und nacheiseeitliche Waldgeschichte
‘Mitteleuropas ndrdlich der Alpen. III; Jena, 480 p. and 256 p.
Fuzes, M., 1956, A kiskunfélegyhézi Templom-domb k6zépkori temet6jének
névényi maradvanyai (Plant remains from the medieval cemetery of
‘Templomdomb, Kiskunfélegyhaza). Méra F. Miiz. Evkényve 1, 85-89.
Fzes, M., 1977, A nvénytermesziés kezdete hazdnkban, killonds tekintettel
4@ fenékpusziai ndvényleletekre (The beginnings of plant cultivation in
Hungary with special regard to the plant finds from Fenékpuszta),
Doctoral dissertation, Keszthely, Manuscript.
Fizes, M., 1990, A foldmivelés kezdeti szakaseénak (neolitikum és rézkor)
lagyarorszdgon (Plant remains from the early phase of
yn — Neolithic and Copper Age ~ in Hungary. An
archaeobotanical outline). Tapolcai Vérosi Miz. K6zl. 1, 139-238,
Gadl, E., 1988, Sor az dkori Egyiptomban és Mezopotémidban (Beer in
At 'Bypt and Mesopotamia). Budapest, 128 p.
Gasser, G., 1989, Mikroskopische Untersuchung pflanclicher Lebensmittl.
Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart, 412 p.
Goldmann, K., 1982, Markischer Weizen fir Byzanz, Zum Reisebericht
Ibrahim Ibn Jakubs von 965/66. Ausgrabungen in Berlin 6, 197-210.